Desert Rose Elder Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Twentynine Palms, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366404072, with a licensed capacity of 20, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated December 6, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

293 homes in view

Desert Rose Elder Care

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 20 residents · Twentynine Palms, CA · San Bernardino County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #366404072, held since 2001 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
73511 Sunnyvale Dr. · Twentynine Palms, San Bernardino County
Phone
(760) 367-9175
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 20 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
20 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 6, 2025.

Most recent state visit
December 6, 2025
Occupancy at the December 21, 2023 visit
18 of 20 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 16, 2023 to December 21, 2023. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Nov 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unfingerprinted adults are providing care and supervision to residents Staff do not have the required training

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Shari McGill-Cunagin, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, unfingerprinted adults are providing care and supervision to residents, staff files reviewed and all staff present at the facility had criminal record clearances. Regarding allegation #2, staff do not have the required training, staff files reviewed had the appropriate job training. Staff interviewed stated that the facility has provided on-the-job training. Based on LPA observations, interviews, and record review, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated; Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided to the administrator at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231020093548
Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility administered wrong medication to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA Malcore met with Administrator, Sharon Mcgill-Cunagin, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, Facility administered wrong medication to resident in care, staff #1(S1) took another resident's medication and gave it to resident #1 (R1) in error. Based on document review and interviews with relevant parties, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. A plan of correction was discussed with Administrator, Mcgill-Cunagin. An exit interview was conducted at the conclusion of the visit and a copies of reports(LIC9099/LIC9099-D) with appeal rights was provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231025084736
Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handle residents in a rough manner Staff do not treat residents with dignity Staff yell at residents Staff used inappropriate language towards a resident Staff leave non-ambulatory resident in bed all day Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Sharon Mcgill-Cunagin, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, obtaining pertinent documents, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding allegation, staff handle residents in a rough manner, Administrator and staff interviewed deny handling residents in a rough manner. Residents interviewed deny staff treating them in a rough manner. Regarding allegation, staff do not treat residents with dignity, Administrator and staff interviewed deny not treating residents with dignity. Residents interviewed deny that staff do not treat them with dignity. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230901085501
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints4typical 7
State visits on file10typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2001.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025110202411020235612022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Desert Rose Elder Care licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Desert Rose Elder Care in Twentynine Palms (San Bernardino County), California license #366404072, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 20 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 6, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Desert Rose Elder Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Desert Rose Elder Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record20 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.

How much does Desert Rose Elder Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Desert Rose Elder Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Desert Rose Elder Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Desert Rose Elder Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

18 of 20 beds occupied (90%) when the state visited on December 21, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Desert Rose Elder Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2022 for Desert Rose Elder Care; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 21, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnfingerprinted adults are providing care and supervision to residents Staff do not have the required training
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Shari McGill-Cunagin, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, unfingerprinted adults are providing care and supervision to residents, staff files reviewed and all staff present at the facility had criminal record clearances. Regarding allegation #2, staff do not have the required training, staff files reviewed had the appropriate job training. Staff interviewed stated that the facility has provided on-the-job training. Based on LPA observations, interviews, and record review, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated; Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided to the administrator at the conclusion of the visit. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231020093548
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility administered wrong medication to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA Malcore met with Administrator, Sharon Mcgill-Cunagin, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, Facility administered wrong medication to resident in care, staff #1(S1) took another resident's medication and gave it to resident #1 (R1) in error. Based on document review and interviews with relevant parties, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. A plan of correction was discussed with Administrator, Mcgill-Cunagin. An exit interview was conducted at the conclusion of the visit and a copies of reports(LIC9099/LIC9099-D) with appeal rights was provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231025084736
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handle residents in a rough manner Staff do not treat residents with dignity Staff yell at residents Staff used inappropriate language towards a resident Staff leave non-ambulatory resident in bed all day Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Sharon Mcgill-Cunagin, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, obtaining pertinent documents, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding allegation, staff handle residents in a rough manner, Administrator and staff interviewed deny handling residents in a rough manner. Residents interviewed deny staff treating them in a rough manner. Regarding allegation, staff do not treat residents with dignity, Administrator and staff interviewed deny not treating residents with dignity. Residents interviewed deny that staff do not treat them with dignity. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230901085501
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not have criminal record clearances Staff do not have the required training to meet residents needs Staff gave resident another resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA met with Shari McGill-Cunagin and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, obtaining relevant documents, and a tour of the facility. Regarding allegation #1, staff do not have criminal record clearances, All staff files reviewed and all staff present at the facility during the visit had the required fingerprint clearance and are associated to the facility. Regarding allegation #2, staff do not have the required training to meet resident’s needs, LPA reviewed four (4) staff files. All staff files reviewed have the appropriate training in the job assigned to them. All four (4) staff interviewed stated that the facility has provided on-the-job training. All three (3) residents interviewed stated that staff are knowledgeable at their job. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230614141726

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 367-9175
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Desert Rose Elder Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.