Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yucaipa, San Bernardino County, California — state license #360900521, licensed for 130 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 36 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 130 residents · Yucaipa, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #360900521, held since 1993 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
12295 4th Street · Yucaipa, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 797-1131
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 130 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
130 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 46 times and filed 36 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 21, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 11, 2026
Occupancy at the September 19, 2024 visit
84 of 130 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 19, 2021 to September 19, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (17). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 36 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained burns while in care Resident’s burns have worsened due to staff neglect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA met with Kara Richardson Customer Liaison who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with outside parties, staff, residents, record review, and observations. LPA Allen conducted an interview with Resident 1 (R1) who stated a staff member dropped coffee on their leg and foot while serving them breakfast in bed. R1 stated they could not recall who the staff member was, but there was a witness who could possibly confirm the allegation. LPA attempted to interview Resident 2 (R2) but they could not confirm or deny the allegations. The interviews with staff members have stated they observed unexplained scaring thought to be burns on R1’s body but no longer believe R1 was ever burned, and the scaring has inproved since additional care has been provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240917173429
Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure facility has running water. Staff do not assist resident with wound care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the complaint investigation and deliver findings. LPA met with administrator Keely Miller who was informed of the visit. The investigation consisted of observations, records review, and interviews with residents and staff members. Allegation 1. The residents and staff members stated alternative measures were taken to ensure staff and residents had access to water while the water was turned off by the water company. LPA observed an overflow of water in the administrator’s office, and running water througout the facility. It was observed that additional water was purchased. Allegation 2. Interviews conducted with facility staff, facility residents, and records reviewed revealed there are no residents that require, or are receiving wound care. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240801095457
Mar 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff withheld residents debit card.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit, was granted entry, and met with Administrator Keely Miller. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Staff withheld residents debit card. It was alleged that the facility had Resident R1’s debit card in their possession. Interviews with the staff revealed that Resident R1 is self-responsible and does not have a conservator or power of attorney. It was revealed that R1 requested the facility to secure R1’s debit card in a lock box in the front office. R1 signed a document on upon admission on 2/22/2024 allowing the facility to safeguard R1’s debit card. The facility provided R1 full access to obtain the debit card when requested. The staff denied withholding the debit card from R1. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240311093246
Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff put poison in residents food Staff put animal feces in residents food Due to lack of supervision, resident was hit by another resident

**This is an Admended report**** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Keely Miller, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations, staff put poison in residents’ food and staff put animal feces in residents’ food. LPA toured the kitchen and did not observe toxins stored in food areas. Staff interviewed deny putting poison and animal feces in residents' food. Six (6) residents interviewed stated they have not had food poisoning and have not witnessed staff put feces in residents’ food. Regarding the allegation, Lack of supervision resulted in resident being hit by another resident. It is alleged that a resident was hit by another resident and staff did not intervene. Staff interviews reveal, staff do intervene when they witness any altercations between residents. Five (5) out of (6) residents interviewed deny witnessing a resident being hit and staff not intervening. Based othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240202150207
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is being threatened with physical harm while in the facility Resident is being financially abused in the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA met with Christel Hill -Receptionist who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. LPA Allen conducted an interview with Resident 1 (R1) who stated no one at the facility has caused them any physical harm nor has anyone threatened them. R1 was asked about being financially abused while at the facility and R1 stated they have not been financially abused because they handle their own finances. R1 stated there were problems at a prior facility but the problems have since been resolved. LPA Allen observed documents that state R1 is responsible for their own finances. Based on the interview and records reviewed the above findings are Unsubstantiated. A finding of unsubstantiated means although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230922170725
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints24typical 7
State visits on file46typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1993.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202533020247802023915420223622021450
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2023 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 797-1131

Is Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens licensed?

Yes — Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yucaipa (San Bernardino County): California license #360900521, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 130 residents. State records list 36 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 21, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record130 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15

How much does Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Bernardino County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

84 of 130 beds occupied (65%) when the state visited on September 19, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 46 state visits and 36 dated documents since 2021 for Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 19, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained burns while in care Resident’s burns have worsened due to staff neglect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA met with Kara Richardson Customer Liaison who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with outside parties, staff, residents, record review, and observations. LPA Allen conducted an interview with Resident 1 (R1) who stated a staff member dropped coffee on their leg and foot while serving them breakfast in bed. R1 stated they could not recall who the staff member was, but there was a witness who could possibly confirm the allegation. LPA attempted to interview Resident 2 (R2) but they could not confirm or deny the allegations. The interviews with staff members have stated they observed unexplained scaring thought to be burns on R1’s body but no longer believe R1 was ever burned, and the scaring has inproved since additional care has been provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240917173429
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure facility has running water. Staff do not assist resident with wound care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the complaint investigation and deliver findings. LPA met with administrator Keely Miller who was informed of the visit. The investigation consisted of observations, records review, and interviews with residents and staff members. Allegation 1. The residents and staff members stated alternative measures were taken to ensure staff and residents had access to water while the water was turned off by the water company. LPA observed an overflow of water in the administrator’s office, and running water througout the facility. It was observed that additional water was purchased. Allegation 2. Interviews conducted with facility staff, facility residents, and records reviewed revealed there are no residents that require, or are receiving wound care. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240801095457
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff withheld residents debit card.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit, was granted entry, and met with Administrator Keely Miller. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Staff withheld residents debit card. It was alleged that the facility had Resident R1’s debit card in their possession. Interviews with the staff revealed that Resident R1 is self-responsible and does not have a conservator or power of attorney. It was revealed that R1 requested the facility to secure R1’s debit card in a lock box in the front office. R1 signed a document on upon admission on 2/22/2024 allowing the facility to safeguard R1’s debit card. The facility provided R1 full access to obtain the debit card when requested. The staff denied withholding the debit card from R1. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 15, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240311093246
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff put poison in residents food Staff put animal feces in residents food Due to lack of supervision, resident was hit by another resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
**This is an Admended report**** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Keely Miller, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations, staff put poison in residents’ food and staff put animal feces in residents’ food. LPA toured the kitchen and did not observe toxins stored in food areas. Staff interviewed deny putting poison and animal feces in residents' food. Six (6) residents interviewed stated they have not had food poisoning and have not witnessed staff put feces in residents’ food. Regarding the allegation, Lack of supervision resulted in resident being hit by another resident. It is alleged that a resident was hit by another resident and staff did not intervene. Staff interviews reveal, staff do intervene when they witness any altercations between residents. Five (5) out of (6) residents interviewed deny witnessing a resident being hit and staff not intervening. Based oCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240202150207

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being threatened with physical harm while in the facility Resident is being financially abused in the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA met with Christel Hill -Receptionist who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. LPA Allen conducted an interview with Resident 1 (R1) who stated no one at the facility has caused them any physical harm nor has anyone threatened them. R1 was asked about being financially abused while at the facility and R1 stated they have not been financially abused because they handle their own finances. R1 stated there were problems at a prior facility but the problems have since been resolved. LPA Allen observed documents that state R1 is responsible for their own finances. Based on the interview and records reviewed the above findings are Unsubstantiated. A finding of unsubstantiated means although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occuCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230922170725
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff took advantage of resident's visual impairment
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tricia Danielson and Cheryl Goodrich arrived to the facility unannounce to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPAs identified themselves and met with Administrator (AD) Keely Miller. LPAs discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation AD Miller. Regarding the allegation "staff took advantage of resident's visual impairment", it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) removed their eyeglasses to hide their true identification from Resident #1 (R1) and due to R1's poor eyesight, identified themselves as someone else to R1 in an effort to get R1 to take their medication. Interview conducted with AD Miller revealed the incident did occur as alleged. Per AD Miller, R1 will not take their medications from S1. R1 has cataracts and S1 attempted to conceal their true identity from R1 by removing their own glasses to make R1 believe S1 was another staff member. R1 and S1 were unable to be interviewed. Based on LPAs observatCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210310152940
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights Violation of a Resident Facility is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the complaint investigation findings for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Keely Miller Administrator. Allegation #1 Personal Rights Violation of a Resident LPA interviewed four (4) staff members who said that the residents’ personal rights have not been violated. Staff members said that all residents are spoken to with dignity and respect. Interviews were conducted with four (4) four residents who said that staff members have not spoken or handled them in an inappropriate manner. During the interviews with residents, they were asked do they feel that their personal rights have been violated by staff members and they said no and that they are treated right/nice by the staff members. Allegation #2-Facility is in disrepair LPA Allen toured the facility, and it didn’t appear to be in disrepair inside or outside. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 25, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230217095043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are rough with residents Staff pinches residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Receptionist Christelle Bunney and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Keely Miller was unavailable due to weather. During today's visit, LPA interviewed one (1) staff and three (3) resident. Regarding the allegation "Staff are rough with residents". it was alleged that Staff #1(S1) and Staff #2 (S2) are rough when turning residents and will push them or drop them. Thirteen (13) residents were interviewed and an additional interview was attempted with one (1) other resident however, they were found to be non-verbal. Seven (7) staff were also interviewed during the investigation. Seven (7) of thirteen (13) residents interviewed reported although they had not been directly handled roughly by S1 but they had heard that S1 is rough with residents but could not specifically state who the heard the information from. Four (4) of the seCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210121081555
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Christelle Bunney and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Keely Miller was unavailable due to weather. Regarding the allegation "Facility has bed bugs", it was alleged that although the facility sprays to mitigate the spread of bed bugs, the facility is not treated professionally by an exterminator for bed bugs. Interview with AD Miller revealed the facility maintains an ongoing battle with bed bugs. The faciltity follows an established protocol following the discovery of any new outbreaks of bed bugs which includes obtaining a doctor's order for cream, showering the resident and applying the cream, moving the resident out of the room, stripping and washing the resident's bedding, washing all the resident's clothing, spraying the room, fog bombing the room and cleaning the carpets before the resident can return toCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20201022150841
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not adhere to admission agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Christelle Bunney and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Keely Miller was unavailable due to weather. Regarding the allegation "Facility did not adhere to admission agreement", it was alleged that Resident #1(R1) was not receiving assistance with showers as indicated in their admission agreement. Interview with AD Miller indicated R1 was an independent resident and was not entitled to assistance with showers, but did receive assistance if staff had availability. Miller also indicated R1 was not charged for this service and came to expect it. Review of R1's Physician's Report revealed R1 had mild cognitive impairment, lacked the capacity to bathe theirself, and was unable to manage medications. R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan also revealed R1 was to received shower assistance twice weekly. Review of R1's AdmCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20201008162354
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an injury while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Receptionist Christelle Bunney and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Keely Miller was unavailable due to weather. Regarding the allegation "Resident sustained an injury while in care", it was alleged that Resident #1(R1) was unsupervised causing them to trip over a sprinkler and knock out their first row of teeth. Records reviewed did not indicate R1 required constant direct supervision. Review of R1's Physician's Report revealed they are able to leave the facility unassisted and did not have wandering behavior. Review of R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan revealed R1 liked to walk around the parking lot area of the facility for exercise. Interviews conducted with facility staff revealed R1 routinely walked the property for exercise and this incident occurred in the front of the facility in a grassy area wherCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20201110092924
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable death Facility staff did not follow resident's prescribed diet
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Christelle Bunney and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator Keely Miller was unavailble due to weather. Regarding the allegation "Questionable death", it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was killed by the facility due to dehydration. Review of R1's death certificate revealed the immediate cause of R1's death was attributed to cardiac arrest with underlying causes attributed to respiratory arrest and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R1's death certifcate also lists hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, osteoporosis, depression, and glaucoma as significant conditions contributing to R1's death but not resulting in the underlying cause of death. There were no other causes of death listed. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff did not follow resident's prescribed diet", it was alleged that R1 was not providCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200925094514
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Receptionist Christelle Bunney and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Keely Miller was unavailable due to weather. Regarding the allegation "Facility has bed bugs", it was alleged bed bugs are on the resident's beds. Interview with AD Miller revealed the facility maintains an ongoing battle with bed bugs. The facility follows an established protocol following the discovery of any new outbreaks of bed bugs which includes obtaining a doctor's order for cream, showering the resident and applying the cream, moving the resident out of the room, stripping and washing the resident's bedding, washing all the resident's clothing, spraying the room, fog bombing the room and cleaning the carpets before the resident can return to the room. Review of the facility's pest control invoices indicated the facility was treated on 10CDSS inspection report, February 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210121081555
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs Resident's room smells like urine Staff are locking resident in room
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
****This is a copy of Original 9099 dated 9/20/2021, investigation conducted by LPA Jennifer Semin*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jennifer Semin arrived to the facility unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Keeley Miller. The investigation consisted of facility record review and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding the first allegation, Facility has bedbugs. The facility has a monthly contract for extermination services thru Pro-Active (a pest control company) and invoices obtained by LPA indicate that the facility was actively being sprayed for bedbugs on 8/16/2021 and 8/25/2021. Interviews with residents in the affected rooms stated they did not have bedbugs after the pest control service and staff cleaning and disinfecting. In addition to spraying, facility is discarding all linens in problem rooms as well as cleaning and treating furniture and mattresses that may be affectedCDSS inspection report, February 16, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210913091933
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure that resident's room was clean. Facility staff did not meet resident's incontinence needs. Facility staff did not ensure that resident had clean linens. Facility staff did not ensure resident had clean water to drink. Facility staff did not ensure resident was regularly observed for changes in physical functioning.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Bernadette Allen arrived at the facility unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Keely Miller. The investigation consisted of file review, observations, and interviews with six (6) staff members and nine (9) residents. The nine (9) residents said that their rooms are cleaned daily by them or the staff. The residents were asked how often does the staff change their linens and they said once a week or more if needed. The resident in question was interviewed with the assistance of (S1) who translated the interview with (R1) who said that their linens are changed weekly or as needed, their incontinence needs are always met, and they always have clean water to drink. During the visit LPA observed that (R1) had clean drinking water on the side of their bed, there was clean linen on the bed and another staff member came to assist the resident with their grooming needsCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2023 · control 56-AS-20221123134303
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hits residents in care. Staff handles residents in a rough manner. Staff speaks to residents in an inappropriate manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen arrived at the facility unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Keely Miller. The investigation consisted of observations and interviews with six (6) staff members and nine (9) residents. The residents interviewed were asked if any staff member(s) have ever hit them, handled them in a rough manner, or spoken to them in an inappropriate manner. The nine(9) residents stated that the they have never been hit by a staff member(s) or handled in a rough manner and the staff has never spoken to them in an inappropriate manner. The six (6) staff members interviewed said that there hasn't been a time when they have seen or heard of another staff member(s) hitting a resident, or treating the residents in a rough manner, nor have they experienced a staff member speaking to residents in an inappropriate manner. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230201162146

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fell multiple times sustaining injuries
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Bernadette Allen made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of initiating and delivering findings on the complaints above. LPA met with Keely Administrator who was informed of the purpose of my visit and the allegation above. Allegation #1 -Resident fell multiple times sustaining injuries LPA interview three (3) staff members who confirmed that resident 1 (R1) has fallen several times which has caused scars to (R1) legs and forehead. Based on record review and observations during LPA visit the resident has falling several times and sustained injuries while in care. Based on observation and record review as to allegation that the resident has fell multiple times and sustained injury is substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. A deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 28, 2022 · control 56-AS-20221222140837
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident became severely dehydrated while in care Staff failed to provide resident food
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Bernadette Allen made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of initiating and delivering findings on the complaints above. LPA met with Keely Miller Administrator who was informed of the purpose of my visit and the allegations above. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed Resident (R1) file and at one point would feed themself without assistance. (R1) level of care has changed and has been feed by staff members to ensure that the resident is not deprived of food and liquids. LPA observed that the resident had been feed lunch and interviews conducted it was confirmed the resident is currently being feed and given water by staff members throughout the day. Based on the investigation, the above finding is Unsubstantiated. A finding of unsubstantiated means although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 28, 2022 · control 56-AS-20221222140837
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not use proper lifting techniques resulting in resident breaking arm
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado arrived to the facility, unannounced, to conclude an investigation pertaining to the listed allegation. LPA identified herself and met with Krista Overymyer, Med Tech. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. It was reported that facility staff did not use proper lifting techniques, resulting in Resident’s arm being injured. It was stated that Resident #1 was pulled out of the bed utilizing a sheet and Resident’s arm, which caused the injury. LPA Delgado reviewed Resident #1’s care plan and it stated that staff were required to use a lift when assisting Resident #1. Information obtained from interviews, stated that staff members did not use the lift, as required for maximum assistance with all activities of daily living for Resident #1. It was advised that Staff #1 and Staff #2 were not trained in utilizing the Hoyer Lift, which was available. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 18, 2022 · control 18-AS-20210322104401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff removed resident's cast without guidance from a physician Facility staff failed to seek immediate medical attention for resident Facility handling resident's money inappropriately Resident is not being bathed regularly
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado arrived to the facility, unannounced, to conclude an investigation pertaining to the listed allegations. LPA identified herself and met with MedTech Krista Overmyer. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. It was reported to Community Care Licensing that Resident (R1) was injured at the facility, which required R1 to be transported and medically assessed. After the injury, facility staff contacted emergency services. X-rays on R1’s shoulder were taken. It was reported that R1 was required a cast. After interviews with staff and review of records, it was determined that R1 had to wear a splint, not a cast. Facility stated that the splint needed to be removed at times in order to be assessed for cleanliness and proper healing. It was not determined that the splint had to be removed with guidance from a physician. There were concerns that R1 was not being bathed regularly. Information obtained from staff,CDSS inspection report, February 18, 2022 · control 18-AS-20210322104401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not meeting residents incontinence needs Facility staff are not treating residents with dignity Facility have violated resident's personal rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Yolanda Delgado arrived to the facility, unannounced, to conclude an investigation pertaining to the listed allegations. LPA identified herself and met with Krista Overymyer, Med Tech. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. It was reported that staff were not meeting resident’s incontinence needs. It was stated that Resident (R1) had diaper burns. Information obtained from staff interviews stated that R1 would delay diaper changes or refuse to wear the diaper correctly. It was also reported that facility staff are not treating residents with dignity. It was reported that staff members yell and speaking inappropriately towards residents. Information obtained from interviews stated that staff are mean and rude to residents. Additional Interviews conducted with staff and residents revealed that staff do treat residents with dignity. It was also alleged that facility staff have violated resident's personal rights by notCDSS inspection report, February 18, 2022 · control 18-AS-20210322104401

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 46 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
24
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
46
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 797-1131
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Braswell's Mediterranean Gardens? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.