Summerset Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County, California — state license #347005361, licensed for 135 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 30 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 15, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Summerset Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 135 residents · Rancho Cordova, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairBedriddenMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #347005361, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2341 Vehicle Dr · Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 330-1300
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 135 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE A CAPACITY OF 135 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN AND 25 MAY RECEIVE HOSPICE CARE SERVICES. FIRE CLEARED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 35 times and filed 30 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated December 15, 2025.

Most recent state visit
July 1, 2026
Occupancy at the February 6, 2025 visit
94 of 135 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 23, 2021 to February 6, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 30 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20259 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate hygiene care to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed a resident (R1), a resident’s conservator, six staff members (S1-S6), and Barry. LPA Moleski reviewed an incident reported dated 11/17/24 which described R1 as having a change of condition. R1 was off baseline, and the left side of their face was swelling, according to the report. R1 was sent to a hospital for further evaluation. Shortly after R1 was sent to the hospital, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a report alleging R1’s general hygiene was poor, and in particular that R1 had dead skin and other skin breakdown on their palms. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241120164437
Jan 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed Facility staff are falsifying resident records

On 01/10/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to open a complaint into the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to speak to the Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED) Danielle Barry. LPA met with the ED and a brief interview followed. This LPA requested a copy of the schedule for carestaff and med techs along with contact information as well as a copy of the resident roster. The LPA then toured the facility and observed 3 residents sitting in the conversation area of the lobby chatting, 2 kitchen staff cleaning the dining room while 3 residents finished their meals, an activities staff member packing up holiday decorations, and a housekeeping servstaff member servicing resident rooms. In memory care, this LPA observed 7 residents sitting in the common area watching TV and being supervised by 1 caregiver. LPA observed another caregiver assisting a rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250103102458
202413 state visits · 13 documents
Nov 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care Staff did not report incident to resident's responsible party

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Lund met with Administrator Danielle Barry. and explained the reason for the visit. Census: 93 Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care - LPA Lund reviewed facility records, Resident’s (R1) medical records and interviews with staff. Based on reviewed facility records, Resident’s (R1) medical records and interviews with staff. Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC624) dated 6/7/2024 that R1 was sent to Kaiser Roseville for evaluation and treatment on 6/3/2024. Kaiser Admission paperwork dated 6/3/2024 stated that R1 was admitted to the Emergency Room (ER). Hospital admission physical exam states note acute distress and R1’s appearance is well- developed. Report states no unexplained injuries to R1. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240613163034
Sep 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate supervision of resident to reduce injuries Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner Staff did not address resident's skin issues in a timely matter

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio met with Administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, interviews with responsible parties, observation of the facility, review of medical records, review of hospice records, review of facility documentation, and review of documentation provided by the Reporting Party (RP). Staff are not providing adequate supervision of resident to reduce injuries / Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner According to the Reporting Party (RP), Resident 1 (R1) "is prone to wander, fall, and suddenly injure [themselves] should [R1] be left unsupervised or not be properly cared for." RP also stated that R1 has fallen and injured R1's face on three separate occasions and Summerset has not done enough to ensure R1 is safe. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240515152430
Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident fell sustaining a fractures due to staff neglect Staff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of incident Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. According to facility notes, incident reports, and medical records, a resident (R1) suffered numerous falls at this facility between 9/10/18 and 11/10/23. Falls documented during this time period include the following: On 9/10/18, R1 fell while family members were visiting. On 5/21/20, R1 fell on their right hand, and swelling and bruising were observed. R1’s physician was notified. On 6/22/23, R1 suffered an unwitnessed fall and complained of knee pain. R1 was sent to the hospital and R1’s physician was notified. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231204145833
Jun 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident rooms are kept clean. Staff do not ensure that resident has a working call button. Staff do not follow infection control practices. Resident developed a stage 3 pressure injury while in care. Staff retained resident with a prohibited health condition.

On 6/21/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver the findings of this complaint investigation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator (DFA). LPA met with Danielle Barry who assumed her on position on 2/16/24. At the time census was 83 with 30 residing in memory care. LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility. LPA observed 7 residents in the assisted living dining room having breakfast and the Resident Services Director distributing medications. In memory care, LPA observed a med tech distributing medications room-to-room. LPA also observed 7 residents finishing breakfast in the dining area and another 7 residents watching T.V. in the common area. LPA observed the DFA assisting a resident to the elevator as they were being picked up for a doctor's appointment. There were 2 care staff in the kitchenette area cleaning up, and the Dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 21, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231128084622
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. During the course of this investigation, LPA Moleski interviewed eight staff members (S2-S9), a resident's responsible party (R1's RP), a hospice nurse (R1's RN), and a resident (R1). During an interview, R1's RP claimed to have observed a male staff member kick R1's knees out from under R1 in order to get R1 to sit on a toilet. During an interview, R1's hospice nurse said that they had not observed any such maneuvers being used at this facility, and had no suspicions of physical abuse committed by the staff. R1's hospice nurse said they had not observed any unusual or suspicious injuries on R1. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240220140418
Apr 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not follow infection control protocols. Staff are not addressing a scabies outbreak. Staff did not report a scabies outbreak as required.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski toured the second floor and met with a resident (R2). LPA Moleski reviewed hospital discharge paperwork for R2. R2 was diagnosed with scabies on 4/9/24, according to the discharge paperwork. R2 returned to this facility on 4/10/24. LPA Moleski visited R2's room and observed two caregivers (S2 and S3) applying ointment to R2 in bed. S2 and S3 were wearing gloves, but were not wearing gowns or masks. LPA Moleski observed gloves discarded in an uncovered trash can inside R2's room. LPA Moleski observed S3 discard used gloves in an uncovered trash can in a common area. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240220140418
Mar 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident received unlawful eviction notice

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced along with ombudsman Suhair Siraj to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed a copy of an eviction notice served to a resident (R1) on February 9, 2024. According to the notice, R1 was being evicted "due to inappropriate behavior that occurred in the facility." No further description of the alleged behavior was provided. The notice does not include, as required by 22 CCR Section 87224(d)(1)(B-D), specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses and circumstances concerning the reasons relied upon for the eviction, nor does it contain resources available to assist in identifying alternative housing and care options, nor does it include a statement informing residents of their right to file a complaint with the licensing agency, nor does it contain contact information for the licensing agency or for the ombudsmthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240223134826
Feb 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident receives assistance with wheelchair Staff does not ensure resident is brought down for meal service

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed a resident (R1) and five staff members (S1-S5). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file. R1’s assessment states that R1 is to receive two-person assistance with transfers. R1’s preplacement appraisal states that R1 needs assistance getting into R1’s wheelchair. R1 is unconserved and has no powers of attorney documented. R1 was admitted to the facility as of December 11, 2023. In an interview on January 25, 2024, R1 said that R1 was not comfortable with transferring out of bed upon admission, that R1 suffered pain when trying to get up, and that R1 suffered from nausea when out of bed for too long. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240119151219
Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure facility has sufficient staffing to meet the care needs of residents Staff do not ensure residents receive bathing service in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Elisa Weathers and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Weathers and 15 staff members (S1-S15). S1, S6, S7, S8, S10, S11, S12, and S13 work in memory care. S3, S4, S5, and S11 work in assisted living. LPA Moleski interviewed seven residents (R1-R7). R1, R2, R3, R5, R6, and R7 live in assisted living. R4 lives in memory care. In an interview, Weathers said staff hours had been reduced recently. LPA Moleski reviewed staff schedules and resident rosters for this facility. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231201144701
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations14typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints18typical 2
Total complaints14typical 7
State visits on file35typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025990202413135202311020223302021551
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 330-1300

Is Summerset Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Summerset Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rancho Cordova (Sacramento County): California license #347005361, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 135 residents. State records list 30 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated December 15, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Summerset Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Summerset Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE A CAPACITY OF 135 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN AND 25 MAY RECEIVE HOSPICE CARE SERVICES. FIRE CLEARED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.

How much does Summerset Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Summerset Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Summerset Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Summerset Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sacramento County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

94 of 135 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on February 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Summerset Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 35 state visits and 30 dated documents since 2021 for Summerset Assisted Living; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate hygiene care to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed a resident (R1), a resident’s conservator, six staff members (S1-S6), and Barry. LPA Moleski reviewed an incident reported dated 11/17/24 which described R1 as having a change of condition. R1 was off baseline, and the left side of their face was swelling, according to the report. R1 was sent to a hospital for further evaluation. Shortly after R1 was sent to the hospital, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a report alleging R1’s general hygiene was poor, and in particular that R1 had dead skin and other skin breakdown on their palms. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 6, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241120164437
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed Facility staff are falsifying resident records
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 01/10/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to open a complaint into the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to speak to the Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED) Danielle Barry. LPA met with the ED and a brief interview followed. This LPA requested a copy of the schedule for carestaff and med techs along with contact information as well as a copy of the resident roster. The LPA then toured the facility and observed 3 residents sitting in the conversation area of the lobby chatting, 2 kitchen staff cleaning the dining room while 3 residents finished their meals, an activities staff member packing up holiday decorations, and a housekeeping servstaff member servicing resident rooms. In memory care, this LPA observed 7 residents sitting in the common area watching TV and being supervised by 1 caregiver. LPA observed another caregiver assisting a rCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250103102458

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained injuries while in care Staff did not report incident to resident's responsible party
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Lund met with Administrator Danielle Barry. and explained the reason for the visit. Census: 93 Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care - LPA Lund reviewed facility records, Resident’s (R1) medical records and interviews with staff. Based on reviewed facility records, Resident’s (R1) medical records and interviews with staff. Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC624) dated 6/7/2024 that R1 was sent to Kaiser Roseville for evaluation and treatment on 6/3/2024. Kaiser Admission paperwork dated 6/3/2024 stated that R1 was admitted to the Emergency Room (ER). Hospital admission physical exam states note acute distress and R1’s appearance is well- developed. Report states no unexplained injuries to R1. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240613163034
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing adequate supervision of resident to reduce injuries Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner Staff did not address resident's skin issues in a timely matter
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio met with Administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, interviews with responsible parties, observation of the facility, review of medical records, review of hospice records, review of facility documentation, and review of documentation provided by the Reporting Party (RP). Staff are not providing adequate supervision of resident to reduce injuries / Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner According to the Reporting Party (RP), Resident 1 (R1) "is prone to wander, fall, and suddenly injure [themselves] should [R1] be left unsupervised or not be properly cared for." RP also stated that R1 has fallen and injured R1's face on three separate occasions and Summerset has not done enough to ensure R1 is safe. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240515152430
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fell sustaining a fractures due to staff neglect Staff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of incident Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. According to facility notes, incident reports, and medical records, a resident (R1) suffered numerous falls at this facility between 9/10/18 and 11/10/23. Falls documented during this time period include the following: On 9/10/18, R1 fell while family members were visiting. On 5/21/20, R1 fell on their right hand, and swelling and bruising were observed. R1’s physician was notified. On 6/22/23, R1 suffered an unwitnessed fall and complained of knee pain. R1 was sent to the hospital and R1’s physician was notified. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231204145833
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident rooms are kept clean. Staff do not ensure that resident has a working call button. Staff do not follow infection control practices. Resident developed a stage 3 pressure injury while in care. Staff retained resident with a prohibited health condition.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6/21/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver the findings of this complaint investigation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator (DFA). LPA met with Danielle Barry who assumed her on position on 2/16/24. At the time census was 83 with 30 residing in memory care. LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility. LPA observed 7 residents in the assisted living dining room having breakfast and the Resident Services Director distributing medications. In memory care, LPA observed a med tech distributing medications room-to-room. LPA also observed 7 residents finishing breakfast in the dining area and another 7 residents watching T.V. in the common area. LPA observed the DFA assisting a resident to the elevator as they were being picked up for a doctor's appointment. There were 2 care staff in the kitchenette area cleaning up, and the DCDSS inspection report, June 21, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231128084622
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. During the course of this investigation, LPA Moleski interviewed eight staff members (S2-S9), a resident's responsible party (R1's RP), a hospice nurse (R1's RN), and a resident (R1). During an interview, R1's RP claimed to have observed a male staff member kick R1's knees out from under R1 in order to get R1 to sit on a toilet. During an interview, R1's hospice nurse said that they had not observed any such maneuvers being used at this facility, and had no suspicions of physical abuse committed by the staff. R1's hospice nurse said they had not observed any unusual or suspicious injuries on R1. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240220140418
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not follow infection control protocols. Staff are not addressing a scabies outbreak. Staff did not report a scabies outbreak as required.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski toured the second floor and met with a resident (R2). LPA Moleski reviewed hospital discharge paperwork for R2. R2 was diagnosed with scabies on 4/9/24, according to the discharge paperwork. R2 returned to this facility on 4/10/24. LPA Moleski visited R2's room and observed two caregivers (S2 and S3) applying ointment to R2 in bed. S2 and S3 were wearing gloves, but were not wearing gowns or masks. LPA Moleski observed gloves discarded in an uncovered trash can inside R2's room. LPA Moleski observed S3 discard used gloves in an uncovered trash can in a common area. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240220140418
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident received unlawful eviction notice
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced along with ombudsman Suhair Siraj to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed a copy of an eviction notice served to a resident (R1) on February 9, 2024. According to the notice, R1 was being evicted "due to inappropriate behavior that occurred in the facility." No further description of the alleged behavior was provided. The notice does not include, as required by 22 CCR Section 87224(d)(1)(B-D), specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses and circumstances concerning the reasons relied upon for the eviction, nor does it contain resources available to assist in identifying alternative housing and care options, nor does it include a statement informing residents of their right to file a complaint with the licensing agency, nor does it contain contact information for the licensing agency or for the ombudsmCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240223134826
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident receives assistance with wheelchair Staff does not ensure resident is brought down for meal service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with Danielle Barry and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed a resident (R1) and five staff members (S1-S5). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file. R1’s assessment states that R1 is to receive two-person assistance with transfers. R1’s preplacement appraisal states that R1 needs assistance getting into R1’s wheelchair. R1 is unconserved and has no powers of attorney documented. R1 was admitted to the facility as of December 11, 2023. In an interview on January 25, 2024, R1 said that R1 was not comfortable with transferring out of bed upon admission, that R1 suffered pain when trying to get up, and that R1 suffered from nausea when out of bed for too long. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240119151219
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure facility has sufficient staffing to meet the care needs of residents Staff do not ensure residents receive bathing service in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Elisa Weathers and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Weathers and 15 staff members (S1-S15). S1, S6, S7, S8, S10, S11, S12, and S13 work in memory care. S3, S4, S5, and S11 work in assisted living. LPA Moleski interviewed seven residents (R1-R7). R1, R2, R3, R5, R6, and R7 live in assisted living. R4 lives in memory care. In an interview, Weathers said staff hours had been reduced recently. LPA Moleski reviewed staff schedules and resident rosters for this facility. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231201144701

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Resident sustained an injury from a fall while in care 2) Resident was not properly groomed while in care 3) Staff did not address a resident's hygiene needs while in care 4) Staff did not properly maintain a resident's room 5) Resident was charged for services not received
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to Summerset Assisted Living (RCFE) on 10/3/22 at 1:30pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Administrator and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated because LPA could not corroborate the allegation through document review and interviews with staff and family members. LPA Gould conducted interviews with 10 staff members and two family members and reviewed former resident's file. Regrading Sustaining injuries form a fall: LPA was unable to definitively determine that resident fell on 4/4/22. Per incident report the fall was unwitnessed and resident denied falling to staff members and made statements of scratching his head. LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation and resident was not evaluated by a medical professional toCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220602140722
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Supervision: 1) Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet the residents' needs. 2) Facility staff did not provide a resident appropriate care and supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to Summerset Assisted Living (RCFE) on 3/28/22 at 9:30am to continue the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Assistand Executive Director and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews, observations and documentation obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated. LPA Gould conducted a walk-through and shadowing of staff in the memory care unit. LPA observed two med-techs and four caregiver staff on duty during todays inspection. LPA shadowed morning and afternoon med pass and shadowed three caregivers though their rounds at the facility. LPA Gould conducted five staff interviews during today's inspection while shadowing staff. Based on the interviews and observations by LPA, LPA did not observe any needs of residents not being met by the facility staff. Staff answered all LPA questions with confidence andCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2022 · control 27-AS-20211209123723

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 35 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
14
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
18
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
14
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
35
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 330-1300
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Summerset Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.