Golden Age Living 1 is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #345920176, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2025, the most recent dated April 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Golden Age Living 1

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #345920176, held since 2025 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3375 La Cadena Way · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 389-9683
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 3 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 3.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2025, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 29, 2026
Occupancy at the January 22, 2026 visit
2 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 23, 2025 to January 22, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not fingerprint cleared to provide care and supervision to residents. Staff emotionally abuse residents. Staff does not treating residents with respect. Staff not keeping residents personal information confidential.

Licensing Program Analyst Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. Each side interviewed stated different version of events. LPA was able to interview three of four residents at the time and LPA was unable to determine the events. Complainant did not give any identifying information or examples of the incidents. LPA did confirm current staff do have criminal record clearance. LPA interviewed staff. LPA cannot determine the alleged incidents based on lack of information. Based on interviews conducted by the Department and records review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251218112025
Jan 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Staff intimidated a resident in care. 2. Staff yelled at a resident in care. 3. Staff did not provide a variety of meals to a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. 1. Resident stated a staff person waived a knife in their face. A third party heard the resident say a staff person was waiving a knife in their face. The staff person (S1) stated S1 was cutting meat at the counter and the resident was sitting on in the dining area, on the other side of the table away from the S1. S1 stated they put the knife down on the counter when they turned around to talk to the resident. There were no other residents or staff in the area to confirm or deny the incident. Because each side has their version of events and there are no direct witnesses LPA cannot prove or disprove the allegation. Caregiver stated she was uncomfortable to sign report and declined to sign. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260112110037
20257 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff verbally abused resident while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. Each side interviewed stated different version of events. Staff stated they didn’t verbally abuse the residents. There were no direct witnesses to confirm or deny the incident occurred. Because there is not enough evidence the incidents occur or did not occur, the allegation cannot be proved or disproved. Based on interviews conducted by the Department and records review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251113121941
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's incontinence care is being met. Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner.

On December 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver the allegation of the complaint above. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. For the allegations, Staff did not ensure resident's incontinence care is being met, and Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner, LPA conducted extensive interviews. Interviews conducted revealed that staff serve dinner at approximately 4:00 PM and "wraps up" residents at approximately 8:00 PM. Interview conducted with Licensee, confirmed dinner is typically served at 4-4:30 PM. Interview conducted with staff (S1) revealed that five out of six residents required incontinence care. Last depend change is completed at 8:00 PM. Interview conducted with resident (R1) revealed that staff are "good at changing" in the day but if an incontinence accident occurs in the middle of the night, staff does not respond for changing. R1 stated this typically occurs arouthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251125162613
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to residents call button. Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time.

On December 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver the allegation of the complaint above. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. For the allegations, Staff did not respond to residents call button, and staff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time, LPA conducted extensive interviews. Interviews conducted revealed that staff serve dinner at approximately 4:00 PM and "wraps up" residents at approximately 8:00 PM. Interview conducted with Licensee, confirmed dinner is typically served at 4-4:30 PM. Interview conducted with staff (S1) revealed that five out of six residents required incontinence care. Last depend change is completed at 8:00 PM. S1 stated there are two residents in care that tends to be awake throughout the night while the others sleep. Please continue on LIC 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251028090844
Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to residents' calls for assistance in a timely

On September 23, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to investigate the allegation cited above. LPA met with caregivers and explained the purpose of the visit. Today's investigation, LPA conducted interview with Administartor, four residents in care and two caregivers. For the allegation of staff does not respond to residents calls for assistance timely, LPA conducted an interview with R1, R2 and R3 which revealed that staff assist residents as needed. R3 stated they need full assistance with everything and does not have any concerns getting staff's attention as they are attentive. Interview conducted with R4 revealed they have to wait when calling for assistance but staff does come to assist. Interview conducted with S1 and S2 revealed they have not witnessed other caregivers not assisting to residents call. S2 stated if it takes a little longer it is due to staff assisting to other residents in care. Based on information above, the dethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250915111530
May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file12typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2025.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262302025782
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 389-9683

Is Golden Age Living 1 licensed?

Yes — Golden Age Living 1 is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #345920176, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2025; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Golden Age Living 1 care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Golden Age Living 1 with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 3.

How much does Golden Age Living 1 cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Golden Age Living 1's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Golden Age Living 1 accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Golden Age Living 1 is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

2 of 6 beds occupied (33%) when the state visited on January 22, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Golden Age Living 1?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2025 for Golden Age Living 1; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 22, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not fingerprint cleared to provide care and supervision to residents. Staff emotionally abuse residents. Staff does not treating residents with respect. Staff not keeping residents personal information confidential.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. Each side interviewed stated different version of events. LPA was able to interview three of four residents at the time and LPA was unable to determine the events. Complainant did not give any identifying information or examples of the incidents. LPA did confirm current staff do have criminal record clearance. LPA interviewed staff. LPA cannot determine the alleged incidents based on lack of information. Based on interviews conducted by the Department and records review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.CDSS inspection report, January 22, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251218112025
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Staff intimidated a resident in care. 2. Staff yelled at a resident in care. 3. Staff did not provide a variety of meals to a resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. 1. Resident stated a staff person waived a knife in their face. A third party heard the resident say a staff person was waiving a knife in their face. The staff person (S1) stated S1 was cutting meat at the counter and the resident was sitting on in the dining area, on the other side of the table away from the S1. S1 stated they put the knife down on the counter when they turned around to talk to the resident. There were no other residents or staff in the area to confirm or deny the incident. Because each side has their version of events and there are no direct witnesses LPA cannot prove or disprove the allegation. Caregiver stated she was uncomfortable to sign report and declined to sign. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 22, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260112110037

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff verbally abused resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Kerry Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results of the allegation above. LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. Each side interviewed stated different version of events. Staff stated they didn’t verbally abuse the residents. There were no direct witnesses to confirm or deny the incident occurred. Because there is not enough evidence the incidents occur or did not occur, the allegation cannot be proved or disproved. Based on interviews conducted by the Department and records review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251113121941
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident's incontinence care is being met. Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On December 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver the allegation of the complaint above. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. For the allegations, Staff did not ensure resident's incontinence care is being met, and Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner, LPA conducted extensive interviews. Interviews conducted revealed that staff serve dinner at approximately 4:00 PM and "wraps up" residents at approximately 8:00 PM. Interview conducted with Licensee, confirmed dinner is typically served at 4-4:30 PM. Interview conducted with staff (S1) revealed that five out of six residents required incontinence care. Last depend change is completed at 8:00 PM. Interview conducted with resident (R1) revealed that staff are "good at changing" in the day but if an incontinence accident occurs in the middle of the night, staff does not respond for changing. R1 stated this typically occurs arouCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251125162613
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to residents call button. Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On December 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver the allegation of the complaint above. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. For the allegations, Staff did not respond to residents call button, and staff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time, LPA conducted extensive interviews. Interviews conducted revealed that staff serve dinner at approximately 4:00 PM and "wraps up" residents at approximately 8:00 PM. Interview conducted with Licensee, confirmed dinner is typically served at 4-4:30 PM. Interview conducted with staff (S1) revealed that five out of six residents required incontinence care. Last depend change is completed at 8:00 PM. S1 stated there are two residents in care that tends to be awake throughout the night while the others sleep. Please continue on LIC 9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251028090844
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to residents' calls for assistance in a timely
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On September 23, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced at the facility to investigate the allegation cited above. LPA met with caregivers and explained the purpose of the visit. Today's investigation, LPA conducted interview with Administartor, four residents in care and two caregivers. For the allegation of staff does not respond to residents calls for assistance timely, LPA conducted an interview with R1, R2 and R3 which revealed that staff assist residents as needed. R3 stated they need full assistance with everything and does not have any concerns getting staff's attention as they are attentive. Interview conducted with R4 revealed they have to wait when calling for assistance but staff does come to assist. Interview conducted with S1 and S2 revealed they have not witnessed other caregivers not assisting to residents call. S2 stated if it takes a little longer it is due to staff assisting to other residents in care. Based on information above, the deCDSS inspection report, September 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250915111530

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 389-9683
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Golden Age Living 1? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.