Small home · Licensed for 6 · Citrus Heights
Spring Azure Senior Care
6924 Oak Spring Way, Citrus Heights, CA 95621Licensed since 2024
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY. ONE(1) RESIDENT IN ROOMS 1 AND 3 EACH. TWO(2) RESIDENTS IN ROOMS 2 AND 4 EACH. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FOUR(4).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Spring Azure Senior Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,950a month to start
Likely $4,050–$6,100
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,950likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,950likely $4,050–$6,100
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,250
- $4,950
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,450
- $7,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,800
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,650–$6,300.
- Best Life Home CareCitrus Heights · 0.8 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glorious Homes #1Citrus Heights · 0.9 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Citrus Pines Senior LivingCitrus Heights · 1.7 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Mount Hood Serenity CareSacramento · 1.7 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Broadway Senior LivingRoseville · 2.3 mi · Small home$6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Angels Assisted LivingRoseville · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Elderly Inn IIICitrus Heights · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
6924 Oak Spring Way, Citrus Heights, CA 95621Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Mercy San Juan Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.7 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #345920099 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unfounded”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility is not sufficiently staffed to meet the needs of resident Staff do not properly monitor residents alcohol consumption
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Wednesday June 3, 2026, unannounced to conduct a complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Dyan and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed Dyan and staff regarding the allegations. LPA learned the following: R1 has lived at the facility since February 2026. R1 needs assistance from staff to reposition. Per R1's request, staff are to wake them up (if needed) before repositioning. On May 26, 2026, staff attempted to wake R1 up in order to reposition them. R1 then began to yell at staff and hit S2 on their arm, leaving a bruise. R1 later apologized for their behavior, stating that they drank too much alcohol. LPA reviewed staffing schedules for the facility: this facility currently has 6 residents, 4 of which are ambulatory and 2 are non-ambulatory. There are two staff scheduled 7am - 7pm daily with one awake staff from 7pm - 7am. Additionally, the administrator is here 9am - 5pm Monday - Friday and works as direct care staff on Saturday and Sunday. Staff stated that this was the only incident where R1 attempted to Unfounded hit staff and has not occurred since. R1 has a history of being rude or yelling at staff. LPA interviewed R2 who stated that they felt the facility is staffed appropriately. R2 stated that their needs are being met. LPA reviewed R1's facility file including LIC625, physicians report, admission agreement, and resident appraisal. R1 is their own power of attorney. Per R1's 602, there is no cognitive impairment, and they can manage their own medication. R1 needs assistance with dressing, toileting, and repositioning. R1 can leave the facility unassisted. LPA did not find any documentation from R1's physician stating that they could not drink or to limit alcohol. Additionally, there are no house rules regarding alcohol consumption. R1 refused to meet with LPA during the facility visit. Based on the evidence provided, the preponderance of evidence standards was not met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260527133619
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/09/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Dyan Christine Chua-Harris and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the facility. Areas toured include but not limited to resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven(7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed the fire extinguisher located in the hallway last inspected on 11/07/2025. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted throughout the facility. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files. Resident files contain signed admission agreements, physician's reports, appraisals, identification sheets, and resident's rights. LPA reviewed two (2) staff files. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current training completed. LPA requested for Administrator to email LPA a copy of the Liability Insurance by 12/12/2025. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2025
Feb 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/10/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Dyan Christine Chua-Harris and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the facility. Areas toured include but not limited to (4) resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven(7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed the fire extinguisher located in the hallway last inspected on 11/11/2024. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted throughout the facility. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files. Resident files contain signed admission agreements, physician's reports, appraisals, identification sheets, and resident's rights. LPA reviewed two (2) staff files. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current training completed. LPA requested for Administrator to email LPA a copy of the LIC308 and Liability Insurance by 02/14/2025. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility is not ADA accessible. Staff not providing a safe environment for resident(s).
On 09/26/24, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cheyenne Ratajczak and Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 05/30/24. LPA met with Administrator, Dyan Christine Chua-Harris and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the complaint investigation. Please continue to LIC9099-C.. Unfounded Allegation- Facility is not ADA accessible. -UNFOUNDED The department conducted record review and interviews with staff and residents to investigate this allegation. During staff interviews, Administrator stated that facility has approved emergency disaster plan and was not ADA compliant (Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design) as it is not a requirement. Record review indicated that facility has Approved Fire Evacuation plan and Approved Facility’s sketch by local fire department per requirement. Department observed that facility was in compliance of Approved Fire plan for facility’s operations and there were no issues. From gathered information, it has been concluded that facility was operating under RCFE Title 22 Regulations which does NOT require facility to follow ADA guidelines, therefore this allegation was found to be UNFOUNDED. Allegation- Staff not providing a safe environment for resident(s). -UNFOUNDED Department conducted record review and interviews with staff and residents to investigate this allegation. It was alleged that facility’s main hallway and backyard area was not safe to meet resident’s medical transportation needs. Residents and staff interviews conducted on 06/04/24 indicated that resident, R1 was scheduled to go for doctor’s appointment on 05/30/24 in private ambulance on gurney which was arranged by facility. When the driver came to pick up R1, driver assessed that facility’s main hallway and backyard area was not safe for gurney transport and left the facility without taking R1. After that, facility called another private ambulance company who came and assisted R1 on gurney and transport R1 to their doctor’s appointment without any issues. During R1s interview on 06/04/24, R1 did not express any concerns with staff’s care or safety at the facility. Department observed that facility was providing safe environment to all residents without any issues. Based on gathered information, this allegation was found to be UNFOUNDED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240530151725
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff are using a medical device on resident without authorization.
On 09/26/24, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cheyenne Ratajczak and Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 07/05/24. LPA met with Administrator, Dyan Christine Chua-Harris and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the complaint investigation. Please continue to LIC9099-C Unfounded Allegation- Staff are using a medical device on resident without authorization. - UNFOUNDED The Department conducted record review and interviews with staff and residents to investigate this allegation. It was alleged that facility is using an external catheter for resident, R1 without physician’s order for R1’s toileting care needs. Record review indicated that per R1s physician, facility does not require any doctor’s order to use external catheter to address resident’s toileting care needs as it falls under Incontinent Supplies which does not require any doctor’s orders. During staff and resident’s interview, it has been concluded that facility tried to use external catheter for a day, but it did not work out, so staff stopped use. R1 did not verbalize any issues with external catheter and were at their baseline without any issues. Based on gathered information, it has been concluded that facility used external catheter to address R1s toileting needs but that was not a violation of Title 22 Regulations, therefore, this allegation was found to be UNFOUNDED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240705090948
May 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Post Licensing
On 05/16/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a post- licensing visit utilizing the care tool. LPA met with Administrator, Christine Chua- Harris and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility was licensed on/around 02/13/24 for six (6) non-ambulatory residents and has an approved hospice waiver for four (4). Currently, there are six (6) residents and no one receiving hospice services. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility. Areas toured include but not limited to: resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, garage, and backyard. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven (7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins, knives and medications are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Hot water temperature was measured at 117.2 degrees Fahrenheit at the kitchen sink, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. The temperature in the facility was 74 degrees. Fire extinguisher was last inspected on 11/06/23. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operable. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted throughout the facility. LPA conducted a file review of two (2) resident files and one (1) staff file. LPA observed one (1) staff working at the facility who is not fingerprint cleared. Administrator stated they will send staff today to get fingerprinted. LPA additionally provided facility with LIC311f which states required documents for personnel and resident files. LPA completed the full care tool, deficiencies was observed and civil penalties was assessed. Please see LIC 809-D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024
Feb 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived announced to conduct a pre-licensing inspection at 2:15 pm on 2/2/24. LPA met with Christine Chua- Harris, Administrator and Shane Harris, Co-Licensese. There are currenly no residents present as this location has a new license pending. LPA, Administrator and Licensee toured the interior and exterior of the facility including the common areas, (2) private resident bedrooms (2) shared resident bedrooms, (2) resident bathrooms, kitchen, office area and laundry/garage. LPA observed the facility to be clean, have newly remodeled rooms equipped with furniture and lighting throughout. The bathrooms have the necessary grab bars, and non-skid flooring- to post 20-second hand-washing posters. LPA observed some non-perishable food and dishes, flatware and cooking pans in the kitchen. Sharps and toxins are locked in the kitchen using magnetic locks. Medications will be stored in a locked cabinet in the office area. LPA observed a patio table and chairs and (2) unlocked exit gates in the backyard. All exit doors have alarms. The inside temperature measured 68*F. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 11/6/23. LPA observed a complete First Aid kit and sufficient PPE and paper supplies. All smoke/monoxide alarms work. Water temperature measured 114*F in the kitchen. Refrigerator/freezer measured 37*F/0*F, within regulation. LPA observed sufficient linens/towels/blankets. LPA observed various required postings posted, including the Emergency Disaster Plan and Theft & Loss Policy. LPA observed some games/activities and an operating land line. LPA reviewed a sample resident file and found it to contain all the required forms. Staff files are digitized. Administrator to repair two small tears in two window screens by tomorrow. Component III was reviewed during today’s inspection. Pre-Licensing is complete and this facility has no deficiencies. Exit interview. Copy of report left at facility. LPA to notify to the Centralized Applications Bureau.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2024
Jan 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 0 COMP II Participants: Christine Dyan Chua-Harris, Administrator/Applicant and Shane Harris, Applicant Interview Method: Virtual interview (MS Teams) On 01/08/2024, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2024
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 3, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Shdc Properties LLC, licensed since 2024.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2024, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2024, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Spring Azure Senior Care
Is Spring Azure Senior Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Spring Azure Senior Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Spring Azure Senior Care been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Spring Azure Senior Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Spring Azure Senior Care cost?
$4,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Citrus Heights that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,625 a month, and the middle figure is $4,800 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Spring Azure Senior Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Shdc Properties LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Spring Azure Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Spring Azure Senior Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SPRING AZURE SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #345920099. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Shdc Properties LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$6,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Sacramento County