Senior Guest Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701508, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 19 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated June 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

13 homes in view

Senior Guest Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Elk Grove, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701508, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8890 Harlow Ct · Elk Grove, Sacramento County
Phone
(702) 629-0201
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 3 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FIRE CLEARANCE FOR SIX(6) OF WHICH, FOUR(4) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. NON-AMBULATORY CLEARED IN BEDROOMS #1-3. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (3).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 19 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 4, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 4, 2026
Occupancy at the May 22, 2026 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 17, 2025 to May 22, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 19 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 9 documents
Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in a physical altercation.

On May 22, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villnueva arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a follow-up complaint visit and deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA Villanueva intially met with staff on duty, Elgeata Crooks (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. Present during this visit were 4 residents with 2 staff on duty. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by S1 and stated she is helping today and that two residents were out for a walk with Apakuki Nawasa (S2). S2 arrived shortly after with two residents from their walks. S2 confirmed he is still the facility manager. It was alleged that staff did not prevent residents from engaging in a physical altercation. The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. {1 of 2} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260309153949
May 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident's medical needs are met

On May 22, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villnueva arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a follow-up complaint visit and deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA Villanueva intially met with staff on duty, Elgeata Crooks (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. Present during this visit were 4 residents with 2 staff on duty. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by S1 and stated she is helping today and that two residents were out for a walk with Apakuki Nawasa (S2). S2 arrived shortly after with two residents from their walks. S2 confirmed he is still the facility manager. It was alleged that staff do not ensure resident’s medical needs are met. The investigaiton into this allegation consisted of interviews with relevant persons and record reviews obtained from the facility. {1 of 2} Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260312153303
May 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care

On 05/04/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua and Cosumnes High Utlizier Specialist (CHUS), Eddie Rachsein arrived to this facility unannounced to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua met with Staff Member, Estia Nawani and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Shortly after, LPA Pascua met with House Manager, Apakuki Nawasa and Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Bulou Dranica Matadua. Current census was 4. It was learned that 1 resident was out at the hospital at this time. During the course of this visit, LPA Pascua conducted a tour of the facility and reviewed facility records. Based on the information gathered, R1 eloped from the facility on six separate occasions in January 2026, as well as on 02/15/2025 and 04/08/2025. Interviews further revealed that on one of these occasions, R1 was found at a major intersection on the same day. During today’s visit, LPA Pascua observed R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260302155019
May 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to neglect/lack of care and supervision, residents had access to illegal drugs. Staff did not prevent residents from eloping from the facility.

On 03-11-2026, Licensing Program Analyst, Arvin Villanueva (LPA), arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a follow-up complaint investigation visit and deliver findings regarding the allegations noted above. LPA met with facility manager, Apakuki Nawasa (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. Present during this visit were 4 in care with 1 staff on duty. Throughout this investigation, the Department conducted interviews with relevant persons, including, but not limited to, staff and residents, record reveiws of relevant documents, and facility observations. Upon review and investigation of the above allegations, the Department determined the following. {1 of 4} Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251112124819
Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yell at residents in care. Staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care.

On 12/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst, Arvin Villanueva (LPA), arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct the initial complaint visit regarding the allegations noted above. LPA initially met with staff on duty, Laisa Peters (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. S1 notified the Administrator, Bulou Matamadua, of the visit. Apakuki Nawasa, identified as Bulou's husband, arrived shortly after. Upon entrance, LPA was greeted by S1 and interview was immediately conducted. Present during today's visit were 4 residents in care with 1 staff on duty. LPA interviewed S2 after arrving at the facility. LPA conducted facility obsevation, including but not limited to, the interior of the facility, backyard, and front yard. LPA conducted staff interviews and record reviews of resident and staff files. LPA also conducted interviews with witnesses. Also during this visit, LPA returned the files that was removed earlier today for the purpose of copying relevant documents at the Regional Offithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251208152635
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints7typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file20typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202669320255612024440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (702) 629-0201

Is Senior Guest Home licensed?

Yes — Senior Guest Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove (Sacramento County): California license #342701508, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 19 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 4, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Senior Guest Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Senior Guest Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FIRE CLEARANCE FOR SIX(6) OF WHICH, FOUR(4) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. NON-AMBULATORY CLEARED IN BEDROOMS #1-3. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (3).

How much does Senior Guest Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Senior Guest Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Senior Guest Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Senior Guest Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on May 22, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Senior Guest Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 19 dated documents since 2024 for Senior Guest Home; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 22, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent residents from engaging in a physical altercation.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On May 22, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villnueva arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a follow-up complaint visit and deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA Villanueva intially met with staff on duty, Elgeata Crooks (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. Present during this visit were 4 residents with 2 staff on duty. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by S1 and stated she is helping today and that two residents were out for a walk with Apakuki Nawasa (S2). S2 arrived shortly after with two residents from their walks. S2 confirmed he is still the facility manager. It was alleged that staff did not prevent residents from engaging in a physical altercation. The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. {1 of 2} UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260309153949
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident's medical needs are met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On May 22, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villnueva arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a follow-up complaint visit and deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA Villanueva intially met with staff on duty, Elgeata Crooks (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. Present during this visit were 4 residents with 2 staff on duty. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by S1 and stated she is helping today and that two residents were out for a walk with Apakuki Nawasa (S2). S2 arrived shortly after with two residents from their walks. S2 confirmed he is still the facility manager. It was alleged that staff do not ensure resident’s medical needs are met. The investigaiton into this allegation consisted of interviews with relevant persons and record reviews obtained from the facility. {1 of 2} SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260312153303
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/04/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua and Cosumnes High Utlizier Specialist (CHUS), Eddie Rachsein arrived to this facility unannounced to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua met with Staff Member, Estia Nawani and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Shortly after, LPA Pascua met with House Manager, Apakuki Nawasa and Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Bulou Dranica Matadua. Current census was 4. It was learned that 1 resident was out at the hospital at this time. During the course of this visit, LPA Pascua conducted a tour of the facility and reviewed facility records. Based on the information gathered, R1 eloped from the facility on six separate occasions in January 2026, as well as on 02/15/2025 and 04/08/2025. Interviews further revealed that on one of these occasions, R1 was found at a major intersection on the same day. During today’s visit, LPA Pascua observed R1CDSS inspection report, May 4, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260302155019
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect/lack of care and supervision, residents had access to illegal drugs. Staff did not prevent residents from eloping from the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 03-11-2026, Licensing Program Analyst, Arvin Villanueva (LPA), arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a follow-up complaint investigation visit and deliver findings regarding the allegations noted above. LPA met with facility manager, Apakuki Nawasa (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. Present during this visit were 4 in care with 1 staff on duty. Throughout this investigation, the Department conducted interviews with relevant persons, including, but not limited to, staff and residents, record reveiws of relevant documents, and facility observations. Upon review and investigation of the above allegations, the Department determined the following. {1 of 4} SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251112124819

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yell at residents in care. Staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst, Arvin Villanueva (LPA), arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct the initial complaint visit regarding the allegations noted above. LPA initially met with staff on duty, Laisa Peters (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. S1 notified the Administrator, Bulou Matamadua, of the visit. Apakuki Nawasa, identified as Bulou's husband, arrived shortly after. Upon entrance, LPA was greeted by S1 and interview was immediately conducted. Present during today's visit were 4 residents in care with 1 staff on duty. LPA interviewed S2 after arrving at the facility. LPA conducted facility obsevation, including but not limited to, the interior of the facility, backyard, and front yard. LPA conducted staff interviews and record reviews of resident and staff files. LPA also conducted interviews with witnesses. Also during this visit, LPA returned the files that was removed earlier today for the purpose of copying relevant documents at the Regional OffiCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251208152635

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(702) 629-0201
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Senior Guest Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.