House Of Judah is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701343, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, change of location in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 8 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated November 21, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

House Of Judah

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Location”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

The state also licenses a home at this address today: Redlands Heritage Care Home Llc · licence #342701799

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #342701343, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8717 Redlands Way · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 897-8123
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. 1 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENT IN BEDROOM #1 AND #3, 2 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS IN BEDROOMS #2 AND #4. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (2).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 8 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on November 21, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
November 21, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
3 of 0 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 3, 2025 to November 21, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 8 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff physically assaulted resident. Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident wandering away from the facility.

On 11/21/2025 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shakaricka Hughes arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Apakuki Nawasa and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 3. A brief interview with conducted with Apakuki. Allegation: Staff physically assaulted resident. It was alleged that a facility staff physically assaulted a resident. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, and the reporting party. On 10/01/2025 LPA Hughes conducted a visit to the facility and interviewed 2 out of 2 facility staff who both denied allegations of harming or physically assaulting a resident in care. On 11/19/2025 LPA interviewed 1 resident who stated that they have no concern about staff harming them or other residents in care. On 9/25/2025 LPA spoke with the reporting party who stated that resident (R1) was observed for athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250922183708
Nov 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is refusing to accept resident back after hospital stay

On 03/24/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Pang Lee and Shakaricka Hughes arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with care staff Bulou Matamadua. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 4. It was alleged that staff is refusing to accept a resident back after their hospital stay. The investigation included interviews with facility staff and a review of records. According to an interview with Staff 1 (S1), Resident 1 (R1) was sent to Kaiser on 02/05/25 due to behavior issues and not being at their baseline. S1 stated that when R1 was ready for discharge, the hospital contacted S1, but S1 informed them that R1 would only be accepted back into the facility if R1's medication was adjusted to address R1’s behavior. A review of the records confirmed that R1 was admitted to Kaiser for delirium, and it was learned that R1's medication had been adjusted. Continued LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250207170146
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident is adequately fed resulting in resident losing weight Licensee does not ensure staff are properly trained Staff does not ensure reporting requirements are being followed Staff did not prevent resident from developing a pressure injury while in care

On 03/03/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff nand explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 6. A brief interview with FDR was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident is adequately fed resulting in resident losing weight. It was alleged that staff did not ensure that resident is adequately fed resulting in resident losing weight. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted with 3 residents. 3 out 3 residents state that they have enough food eat however the type of food eaten could be changed throughout the week. An interview with 3 staff members were conducted. 3 out 3 staff members deny that they do not feed the residents with enough food. 3 out 3 residents state that there is plenty of food fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241007105632
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file9typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254502024330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is House Of Judah licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists House Of Judah in Sacramento (Sacramento County), California license #342701343, as “Closed, Change Of Location, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 8 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated November 21, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can House Of Judah care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists House Of Judah with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. 1 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENT IN BEDROOM #1 AND #3, 2 NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS IN BEDROOMS #2 AND #4. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (2).

How much does House Of Judah cost?

California's public licensing record does not include House Of Judah's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does House Of Judah accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

House Of Judah is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 0 beds occupied (0%) when the state visited on November 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for House Of Judah?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 8 dated documents since 2024 for House Of Judah; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff physically assaulted resident. Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident wandering away from the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/21/2025 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shakaricka Hughes arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Apakuki Nawasa and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 3. A brief interview with conducted with Apakuki. Allegation: Staff physically assaulted resident. It was alleged that a facility staff physically assaulted a resident. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, and the reporting party. On 10/01/2025 LPA Hughes conducted a visit to the facility and interviewed 2 out of 2 facility staff who both denied allegations of harming or physically assaulting a resident in care. On 11/19/2025 LPA interviewed 1 resident who stated that they have no concern about staff harming them or other residents in care. On 9/25/2025 LPA spoke with the reporting party who stated that resident (R1) was observed for aCDSS inspection report, November 21, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250922183708
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is refusing to accept resident back after hospital stay
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 03/24/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Pang Lee and Shakaricka Hughes arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with care staff Bulou Matamadua. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the allegation above. The current census is 4. It was alleged that staff is refusing to accept a resident back after their hospital stay. The investigation included interviews with facility staff and a review of records. According to an interview with Staff 1 (S1), Resident 1 (R1) was sent to Kaiser on 02/05/25 due to behavior issues and not being at their baseline. S1 stated that when R1 was ready for discharge, the hospital contacted S1, but S1 informed them that R1 would only be accepted back into the facility if R1's medication was adjusted to address R1’s behavior. A review of the records confirmed that R1 was admitted to Kaiser for delirium, and it was learned that R1's medication had been adjusted. Continued LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250207170146
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident is adequately fed resulting in resident losing weight Licensee does not ensure staff are properly trained Staff does not ensure reporting requirements are being followed Staff did not prevent resident from developing a pressure injury while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 03/03/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff nand explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 6. A brief interview with FDR was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident is adequately fed resulting in resident losing weight. It was alleged that staff did not ensure that resident is adequately fed resulting in resident losing weight. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted with 3 residents. 3 out 3 residents state that they have enough food eat however the type of food eaten could be changed throughout the week. An interview with 3 staff members were conducted. 3 out 3 staff members deny that they do not feed the residents with enough food. 3 out 3 residents state that there is plenty of food fCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241007105632

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 897-8123
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run House Of Judah? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.