Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701251, licensed for 94 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 53 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated July 1, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 94 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701251, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3950 Annadale Lane · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 489-6900
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.ANNADALE BUILDING FIRE CLEARANCE 82 NON-AMB, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.ALL BEDROOMS APPROVED FOR NON-AMB, BEDRIDDEN3712 AUBURN BUILDING FIRE CLEARANCE 12 BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 20. NEW MGT CO, STEAMER LANE LLC, EFFECTIVE 2/1/26.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 64 times and filed 53 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated July 1, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 1, 2026
Occupancy at the October 31, 2025 visit
83 of 94 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 18 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 29, 2024 to October 31, 2025. 18 of the 18 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 18 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 18 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 53 of 53 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
202611 state visits · 14 documents
Jul 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202516 state visits · 27 documents
Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not get timely medical care for resident Staff are not following physician’s orders

On 10/31/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. The current census is 83. It was alleged that staff did not obtain timely medical care for a resident and that staff are not following physician’s orders. The investigation included a review of records, residents’ medications, observations, and interviews with staff, residents, resident's responsible party (RP) and an outside agency. Based on record review and interviews, Resident 1 (R1) was sent to the hospital on 01/30/2025 for dermatitis and was prescribed medications for skin itching and redness. On 07/19/2025, R1 was again sent to the hospital for two separate rashes, and new medications were prescribed. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250724091520
Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for residents Staff are not meeting residents’ personal hygiene needs

On 10/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. PA Lee met with the Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the above allegation. The current census is82. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. It was alleged that staff did not seek timely medical attention for residents. The investigation was conducted, including a review of relevant documentation, interviews with facility staff, residents in care and the residents’ Responsible Party (RP). Throughout the investigation it was learned that on 02/17/2025, resident 1 (R1) experienced a fall and was transported to the hospital for evaluation. The discharge diagnosis noted eyebrow abrasion, and discharge instructions advised a follow-up with the primary care provider (PCP) within one week. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250326150306
Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff forced resident in care to shower Staff did not ensure that a comfortable facility temperature was maintained for resident in care

On 10/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver a complaint finding for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. It was alleged that staff forced residents in care to shower. An investigation was conducted, which included a review of records and interviews with both staff and residents. According to the records, Resident 1 (R1) was originally scheduled to shower on Mondays and Fridays. It was learned that R1 wanted to change the shower days to Sundays and Tuesdays and had expressed this concern to Executive Director Corpus. In response, Executive Director Corpus updated R1’s shower schedule to Mondays and Wednesdays on the same day the concern was raised. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250902151357
Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents.

On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents, as well as reviewed relevant records. Based on interviews with staff and all 5 out of 5 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation referenced above. None of the staff and residents interviewed confirmed that staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250508133712
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handle resident in a rough manner. Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care

On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff handled resident in a rough manner and it was alleged that staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents, as well as reviewed relevant records. Based on interviews with staff and all 7 out of 7 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations referenced above. CONTINUED LIC 809-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250711104308
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure residents personal property was safely secured

On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff did not ensure resident personal property was safely secured. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents. Based on interviews with staff and all 5 out of 5 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation referenced above. None of the staff and residents interviewed confirmed that staff are not ensuring that residents personal property was safely secured. Residents interviewed reported no concerns with the laundry services and confirmed that their clothing is being returnedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250822082812
Sep 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting residents’ needs resulting in injuries

On 09/04/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with facility designated administrator (FDA) Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 79. A brief interview conducted with FDA Corpus. It was alleged staff are not meeting residents needs resulting in pressure injuries. During the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) interviewed staff and residents and reviewed relevant records. Based on these interviews it was learned that 7 out of 7 staff members have not seen any pressure injuries to residents in care. Moreover, R1 stated that the staff members have been changing R1 on time. R2 stated that they are dry and changed on time. LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250128120542
Jul 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to provide accommodations to resident in care

On 6/20/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA met with the facility designated administrator (FDA) Business Office Manager Lisa Johansen who was briefly interviewed at this time. LPA called the interim administrator Brandon Collins and Collins gave permission for FDA to sign. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. It is alleged that staff refused to provide accommodations to resident in care. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed records, interviewed staff members, and residents. In an interview, R1 stated that they wanted a certain part positioned where R1 was not in pain or medically compromised. R1 felt that S1 was not listening to R1. When speaking to R1 they stated that they did not want to file the complaint any longer and that R1 was getting frustrated at the time. S1 stated that S1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250609092802
Jun 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unexplained death Staff did not ensure that a resident's incontinence needs were met Staff did not observe resident for a change in condition Staff did not answer resident's call button

On 6/5/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPAs met with the Brandon Collins who was briefly interviewed at this time. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. It is alleged that there was an unexplained death at the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed records, interviewed Reporting Party (RP), and interviewed staff members. RP stated that R1 had a gash on R1’s forehead and bruising to the side of R1’s eye according to postmortem pictures sent to the LPA. Staff 9 (S9) and S1 in an interview stated that when they found Resident1 (R1) they had fallen out of the chair onto R1’s face Based on the death certificate R1 died of cardiac arrest and other Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250205094444
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing residents with snacks

On 6/05/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) Brandon Collins and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 83. A brief interview with the FDA was conducted. Facility is not providing residents with snacks: During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed five residents, nine staff, and reviewed the menu with the including snack times. LPA went to the facility three times and the first time on 1/16/25 there were snacks, the second time on 4/8/25 no snacks, and the third time on 4/21/25 there were oranges. Two out of five residents state there are snacks sometimes and then sometimes there are no snacks Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250108121017
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are falsifying resident's medication administration record Staff used chemicals in an unsafe manner, resulting in injury to resident

On 6/05/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) Brandon Collins Current Census was 83. A brief interview with the FDA was conducted. Staff are mismanaging residents’ medication: During the course of the investigation, LPA Williams reviewed facility documents and conducted interviews of nine staff members and five residents. In addition, LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR), PRN notes, exception records and the Controlled Substance Medication Record (CSMR). LPA observed that on 11/27/2024, the Controlled Substance Medication Record (CSMR) for R6 states Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250108121017
Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are charging resident in excess of the rate allowed under the Medi-cal Assistance Program (ALW) Staff did not accord resident privacy and interfered with resident's visit Resident left the facility unattended due to lack of care or neglect from staff Facility staff did not safeguard resident funds

On 4/8/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Williams met with Regional Director of Operations Brandon Collins and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews with staff and residents. A brief interview was held with Brandon Collins. Allegation: Resident left the facility unattended due to lack of care or neglect from staff. It is alleged that the resident left the facility unattended. In an interview, R1 said R1 has never left the facility unattended. In an interview, Alfredo Cruz the prior administrator of Apple Ridge Assisted Living, LLC said that R1 never left the facility while Cruz was there R1 always had a staff member with R1 when leaving the facility. 3 out of 3 staff said that R1 has never left the facility without a staff member. Based on interviews and record review it is unclear if R1 left the facility unattended. [Continue on 9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241217132635
Jan 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility accepts residents for care however the staff cannot meet their needs. Facility staff yell at residents

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Holly Williams made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Williams met with facility administrator Charles White and together discussed the investigation details. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations. LPA Williams interviewed White, six staff members (S1-S6) and eight residents (R1-R9). In an interview, R2 said they have heard staff members yelling at residents. In an interview, S3 stated that she has heard staff members yell "just sit down!" because they were frustrated. In an interview, R9 states that staff members yell at R all the time. S1 said they had a client complain of overnight staff members have treated them residents badly. S3 stated that the facility is neglectful, and they do not treat the residents good. S3 said they are severely [Continued on 809-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241014150651
Jan 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Comfortable temperature is not maintained at the facility as required Facility staff are unable to assist resident in moving out of bed due to lack of staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Williams met with facility administrator Charles White and together discussed the investigation details. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and record review. LPA Williams interviewed White, staff six members (S1-S6) and nine residents (R1-R9). In an interview, S2 states that they try to get the residents who have Hoyer lifts, up for at least one meal a day. In an intIn an interview, R6 states that the staff members get R6 in and out of bed with the Hoyer Lift just fine. R6 said she has no issues. In an interview, R5 said R5 needs a Hoyer Lift to get out of bed. R5 states he gets his showers on time, and he gets out of bed when R5 needs to. In an interview, R2 said the temperature is good and the place is clean. In an interview, R3 stated that the temperature is good. In an interview, R4 said the temperathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241014150651
20248 state visits · 12 documents
Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs Facility staff did not answer resident's call button Facility staff yelled at resident(s) Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident(s)

On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs It was alleged that facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs. During this investigation, the LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted interviews with both staff and residents. Interviews with nine staff members revealed that 5 out of 9 believe they can adequately address residents' incontinence care needs, yet they have observed that some colleagues on certain shifts fail to provide this care. These staff members reported instances where they found residents soiled in urine, with messes extendingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240731123011
Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time Staff did not shower residents in care

On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time It was alleged that facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs. During this investigation, the LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted interviews with both staff and residents. Interviews with 9 staff members revealed that 5 believe they can adequately address residents' incontinence care needs, yet they have observed that some colleagues on certain shifts fail to provide this care. These staff members reported instances where they found residents soiled in urine, with messes extending from incontinence padthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240916172545
Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs

On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs It was alleged that facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs. During the course of this investigation, this LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted staff and resident interviews. In interviews with 9 staff members, 5 out 9 expressed confidence in their ability to assist residents with hygiene but reported witnessing some colleagues neglecting these needs during certain shifts. They noted that upon starting their shifts, they often found residents soiled in urine, with messes extending from incontinence pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240709170841
Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not pass fire inspection clearance.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with Administrator Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs Moleski and Williams obtained a fire inspection report for Apple Ridge from Cruz dated 8/22/24. LPAs Williams and Moleski reviewed the inspection report and observed many violations including, but not limited to, many fire doors which need repairs, latches, and smoke seals, and permits for change of use of a resident room. According the fire inspection report, resident room 41 was converted into a administrative office without proper permitting. LPAs Moleski and Williams reviewed a facility sketch which shows the current administrative office labeled as room number 41. LPAs Moleski and Williams were not notified regarding this change of use. In an interview, the fire inspector who authored the report said that this facility's previous fire clearance was grthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240823155140
Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints26typical 2
Total complaints32typical 7
State visits on file64typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611140202516272202481242023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 489-6900

Is Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc licensed?

Yes — Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701251, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 94 residents. State records list 53 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated July 1, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.ANNADALE BUILDING FIRE CLEARANCE 82 NON-AMB, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.ALL BEDROOMS APPROVED FOR NON-AMB, BEDRIDDEN3712 AUBURN BUILDING FIRE CLEARANCE 12 BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 20. NEW MGT CO, STEAMER LANE LLC, EFFECTIVE 2/1/26.

How much does Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sacramento County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

83 of 94 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on October 31, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 64 state visits and 53 dated documents since 2023 for Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc; 18 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 31, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

18 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not get timely medical care for resident Staff are not following physician’s orders
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/31/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. The current census is 83. It was alleged that staff did not obtain timely medical care for a resident and that staff are not following physician’s orders. The investigation included a review of records, residents’ medications, observations, and interviews with staff, residents, resident's responsible party (RP) and an outside agency. Based on record review and interviews, Resident 1 (R1) was sent to the hospital on 01/30/2025 for dermatitis and was prescribed medications for skin itching and redness. On 07/19/2025, R1 was again sent to the hospital for two separate rashes, and new medications were prescribed. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C UnsubstaCDSS inspection report, October 31, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250724091520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical attention for residents Staff are not meeting residents’ personal hygiene needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. PA Lee met with the Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the above allegation. The current census is82. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. It was alleged that staff did not seek timely medical attention for residents. The investigation was conducted, including a review of relevant documentation, interviews with facility staff, residents in care and the residents’ Responsible Party (RP). Throughout the investigation it was learned that on 02/17/2025, resident 1 (R1) experienced a fall and was transported to the hospital for evaluation. The discharge diagnosis noted eyebrow abrasion, and discharge instructions advised a follow-up with the primary care provider (PCP) within one week. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250326150306
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff forced resident in care to shower Staff did not ensure that a comfortable facility temperature was maintained for resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver a complaint finding for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. It was alleged that staff forced residents in care to shower. An investigation was conducted, which included a review of records and interviews with both staff and residents. According to the records, Resident 1 (R1) was originally scheduled to shower on Mondays and Fridays. It was learned that R1 wanted to change the shower days to Sundays and Tuesdays and had expressed this concern to Executive Director Corpus. In response, Executive Director Corpus updated R1’s shower schedule to Mondays and Wednesdays on the same day the concern was raised. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250902151357
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents, as well as reviewed relevant records. Based on interviews with staff and all 5 out of 5 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation referenced above. None of the staff and residents interviewed confirmed that staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250508133712
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handle resident in a rough manner. Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff handled resident in a rough manner and it was alleged that staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents, as well as reviewed relevant records. Based on interviews with staff and all 7 out of 7 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations referenced above. CONTINUED LIC 809-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250711104308
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure residents personal property was safely secured
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff did not ensure resident personal property was safely secured. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents. Based on interviews with staff and all 5 out of 5 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation referenced above. None of the staff and residents interviewed confirmed that staff are not ensuring that residents personal property was safely secured. Residents interviewed reported no concerns with the laundry services and confirmed that their clothing is being returnedCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250822082812
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not meeting residents’ needs resulting in injuries
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/04/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with facility designated administrator (FDA) Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 79. A brief interview conducted with FDA Corpus. It was alleged staff are not meeting residents needs resulting in pressure injuries. During the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) interviewed staff and residents and reviewed relevant records. Based on these interviews it was learned that 7 out of 7 staff members have not seen any pressure injuries to residents in care. Moreover, R1 stated that the staff members have been changing R1 on time. R2 stated that they are dry and changed on time. LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250128120542
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refused to provide accommodations to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6/20/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA met with the facility designated administrator (FDA) Business Office Manager Lisa Johansen who was briefly interviewed at this time. LPA called the interim administrator Brandon Collins and Collins gave permission for FDA to sign. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. It is alleged that staff refused to provide accommodations to resident in care. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed records, interviewed staff members, and residents. In an interview, R1 stated that they wanted a certain part positioned where R1 was not in pain or medically compromised. R1 felt that S1 was not listening to R1. When speaking to R1 they stated that they did not want to file the complaint any longer and that R1 was getting frustrated at the time. S1 stated that S1CDSS inspection report, June 20, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250609092802
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnexplained death Staff did not ensure that a resident's incontinence needs were met Staff did not observe resident for a change in condition Staff did not answer resident's call button
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6/5/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPAs met with the Brandon Collins who was briefly interviewed at this time. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. It is alleged that there was an unexplained death at the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed records, interviewed Reporting Party (RP), and interviewed staff members. RP stated that R1 had a gash on R1’s forehead and bruising to the side of R1’s eye according to postmortem pictures sent to the LPA. Staff 9 (S9) and S1 in an interview stated that when they found Resident1 (R1) they had fallen out of the chair onto R1’s face Based on the death certificate R1 died of cardiac arrest and other UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250205094444
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing residents with snacks
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6/05/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) Brandon Collins and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 83. A brief interview with the FDA was conducted. Facility is not providing residents with snacks: During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed five residents, nine staff, and reviewed the menu with the including snack times. LPA went to the facility three times and the first time on 1/16/25 there were snacks, the second time on 4/8/25 no snacks, and the third time on 4/21/25 there were oranges. Two out of five residents state there are snacks sometimes and then sometimes there are no snacks UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250108121017
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are falsifying resident's medication administration record Staff used chemicals in an unsafe manner, resulting in injury to resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6/05/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) Brandon Collins Current Census was 83. A brief interview with the FDA was conducted. Staff are mismanaging residents’ medication: During the course of the investigation, LPA Williams reviewed facility documents and conducted interviews of nine staff members and five residents. In addition, LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR), PRN notes, exception records and the Controlled Substance Medication Record (CSMR). LPA observed that on 11/27/2024, the Controlled Substance Medication Record (CSMR) for R6 states SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250108121017
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are charging resident in excess of the rate allowed under the Medi-cal Assistance Program (ALW) Staff did not accord resident privacy and interfered with resident's visit Resident left the facility unattended due to lack of care or neglect from staff Facility staff did not safeguard resident funds
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/8/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Williams met with Regional Director of Operations Brandon Collins and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews with staff and residents. A brief interview was held with Brandon Collins. Allegation: Resident left the facility unattended due to lack of care or neglect from staff. It is alleged that the resident left the facility unattended. In an interview, R1 said R1 has never left the facility unattended. In an interview, Alfredo Cruz the prior administrator of Apple Ridge Assisted Living, LLC said that R1 never left the facility while Cruz was there R1 always had a staff member with R1 when leaving the facility. 3 out of 3 staff said that R1 has never left the facility without a staff member. Based on interviews and record review it is unclear if R1 left the facility unattended. [Continue on 9099CDSS inspection report, April 8, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241217132635
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility accepts residents for care however the staff cannot meet their needs. Facility staff yell at residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Holly Williams made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Williams met with facility administrator Charles White and together discussed the investigation details. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations. LPA Williams interviewed White, six staff members (S1-S6) and eight residents (R1-R9). In an interview, R2 said they have heard staff members yelling at residents. In an interview, S3 stated that she has heard staff members yell "just sit down!" because they were frustrated. In an interview, R9 states that staff members yell at R all the time. S1 said they had a client complain of overnight staff members have treated them residents badly. S3 stated that the facility is neglectful, and they do not treat the residents good. S3 said they are severely [Continued on 809-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241014150651
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedComfortable temperature is not maintained at the facility as required Facility staff are unable to assist resident in moving out of bed due to lack of staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Williams met with facility administrator Charles White and together discussed the investigation details. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and record review. LPA Williams interviewed White, staff six members (S1-S6) and nine residents (R1-R9). In an interview, S2 states that they try to get the residents who have Hoyer lifts, up for at least one meal a day. In an intIn an interview, R6 states that the staff members get R6 in and out of bed with the Hoyer Lift just fine. R6 said she has no issues. In an interview, R5 said R5 needs a Hoyer Lift to get out of bed. R5 states he gets his showers on time, and he gets out of bed when R5 needs to. In an interview, R2 said the temperature is good and the place is clean. In an interview, R3 stated that the temperature is good. In an interview, R4 said the temperaCDSS inspection report, January 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241014150651

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs Facility staff did not answer resident's call button Facility staff yelled at resident(s) Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident(s)
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs It was alleged that facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs. During this investigation, the LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted interviews with both staff and residents. Interviews with nine staff members revealed that 5 out of 9 believe they can adequately address residents' incontinence care needs, yet they have observed that some colleagues on certain shifts fail to provide this care. These staff members reported instances where they found residents soiled in urine, with messes extendingCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240731123011
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time Staff did not shower residents in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time It was alleged that facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs. During this investigation, the LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted interviews with both staff and residents. Interviews with 9 staff members revealed that 5 believe they can adequately address residents' incontinence care needs, yet they have observed that some colleagues on certain shifts fail to provide this care. These staff members reported instances where they found residents soiled in urine, with messes extending from incontinence padCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240916172545
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs It was alleged that facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs. During the course of this investigation, this LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted staff and resident interviews. In interviews with 9 staff members, 5 out 9 expressed confidence in their ability to assist residents with hygiene but reported witnessing some colleagues neglecting these needs during certain shifts. They noted that upon starting their shifts, they often found residents soiled in urine, with messes extending from incontinence pCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240709170841
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not pass fire inspection clearance.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with Administrator Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs Moleski and Williams obtained a fire inspection report for Apple Ridge from Cruz dated 8/22/24. LPAs Williams and Moleski reviewed the inspection report and observed many violations including, but not limited to, many fire doors which need repairs, latches, and smoke seals, and permits for change of use of a resident room. According the fire inspection report, resident room 41 was converted into a administrative office without proper permitting. LPAs Moleski and Williams reviewed a facility sketch which shows the current administrative office labeled as room number 41. LPAs Moleski and Williams were not notified regarding this change of use. In an interview, the fire inspector who authored the report said that this facility's previous fire clearance was grCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240823155140

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 64 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
26
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
32
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
64
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 489-6900
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.