Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701251, licensed for 94 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 53 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated July 1, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2023, the state has visited this home 64 times and filed 53 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated July 1, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 18 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 29, 2024 to October 31, 2025. 18 of the 18 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 18 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 18 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jul 1, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 4, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 13, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 27, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 19, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 19, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 11, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 13, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 4, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 4, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 3, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 16, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 16, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 7, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 9, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 2, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 2, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 25, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 25, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 25, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 25, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 31, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not get timely medical care for resident Staff are not following physician’s orders
On 10/31/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. The current census is 83. It was alleged that staff did not obtain timely medical care for a resident and that staff are not following physician’s orders. The investigation included a review of records, residents’ medications, observations, and interviews with staff, residents, resident's responsible party (RP) and an outside agency. Based on record review and interviews, Resident 1 (R1) was sent to the hospital on 01/30/2025 for dermatitis and was prescribed medications for skin itching and redness. On 07/19/2025, R1 was again sent to the hospital for two separate rashes, and new medications were prescribed. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250724091520
Oct 17, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for residents Staff are not meeting residents’ personal hygiene needs
On 10/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. PA Lee met with the Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint finding for the above allegation. The current census is82. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. It was alleged that staff did not seek timely medical attention for residents. The investigation was conducted, including a review of relevant documentation, interviews with facility staff, residents in care and the residents’ Responsible Party (RP). Throughout the investigation it was learned that on 02/17/2025, resident 1 (R1) experienced a fall and was transported to the hospital for evaluation. The discharge diagnosis noted eyebrow abrasion, and discharge instructions advised a follow-up with the primary care provider (PCP) within one week. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250326150306
Oct 17, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff forced resident in care to shower Staff did not ensure that a comfortable facility temperature was maintained for resident in care
On 10/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver a complaint finding for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with Executive Director Corpus. It was alleged that staff forced residents in care to shower. An investigation was conducted, which included a review of records and interviews with both staff and residents. According to the records, Resident 1 (R1) was originally scheduled to shower on Mondays and Fridays. It was learned that R1 wanted to change the shower days to Sundays and Tuesdays and had expressed this concern to Executive Director Corpus. In response, Executive Director Corpus updated R1’s shower schedule to Mondays and Wednesdays on the same day the concern was raised. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250902151357
Oct 17, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 25, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents.
On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents, as well as reviewed relevant records. Based on interviews with staff and all 5 out of 5 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation referenced above. None of the staff and residents interviewed confirmed that staff are not intervening between verbal interactions of residents. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250508133712
Sep 25, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handle resident in a rough manner. Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care
On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff handled resident in a rough manner and it was alleged that staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents, as well as reviewed relevant records. Based on interviews with staff and all 7 out of 7 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations referenced above. CONTINUED LIC 809-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250711104308
Sep 25, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure residents personal property was safely secured
On 09/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with administrator Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. The current census is 82. A brief interview conducted with the administrator Corpus. It was alleged that staff did not ensure resident personal property was safely secured. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with facility staff and residents. Based on interviews with staff and all 5 out of 5 residents, there is not a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation referenced above. None of the staff and residents interviewed confirmed that staff are not ensuring that residents personal property was safely secured. Residents interviewed reported no concerns with the laundry services and confirmed that their clothing is being returnedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250822082812
Sep 4, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting residents’ needs resulting in injuries
On 09/04/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with facility designated administrator (FDA) Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. The current census is 79. A brief interview conducted with FDA Corpus. It was alleged staff are not meeting residents needs resulting in pressure injuries. During the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) interviewed staff and residents and reviewed relevant records. Based on these interviews it was learned that 7 out of 7 staff members have not seen any pressure injuries to residents in care. Moreover, R1 stated that the staff members have been changing R1 on time. R2 stated that they are dry and changed on time. LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250128120542
Jul 29, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 20, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff refused to provide accommodations to resident in care
On 6/20/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA met with the facility designated administrator (FDA) Business Office Manager Lisa Johansen who was briefly interviewed at this time. LPA called the interim administrator Brandon Collins and Collins gave permission for FDA to sign. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. It is alleged that staff refused to provide accommodations to resident in care. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed records, interviewed staff members, and residents. In an interview, R1 stated that they wanted a certain part positioned where R1 was not in pain or medically compromised. R1 felt that S1 was not listening to R1. When speaking to R1 they stated that they did not want to file the complaint any longer and that R1 was getting frustrated at the time. S1 stated that S1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250609092802
Jun 13, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 6, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unexplained death Staff did not ensure that a resident's incontinence needs were met Staff did not observe resident for a change in condition Staff did not answer resident's call button
On 6/5/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPAs met with the Brandon Collins who was briefly interviewed at this time. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's representative, at this time. It is alleged that there was an unexplained death at the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed records, interviewed Reporting Party (RP), and interviewed staff members. RP stated that R1 had a gash on R1’s forehead and bruising to the side of R1’s eye according to postmortem pictures sent to the LPA. Staff 9 (S9) and S1 in an interview stated that when they found Resident1 (R1) they had fallen out of the chair onto R1’s face Based on the death certificate R1 died of cardiac arrest and other Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250205094444
Jun 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing residents with snacks
On 6/05/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) Brandon Collins and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 83. A brief interview with the FDA was conducted. Facility is not providing residents with snacks: During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed five residents, nine staff, and reviewed the menu with the including snack times. LPA went to the facility three times and the first time on 1/16/25 there were snacks, the second time on 4/8/25 no snacks, and the third time on 4/21/25 there were oranges. Two out of five residents state there are snacks sometimes and then sometimes there are no snacks Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250108121017
Jun 5, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are falsifying resident's medication administration record Staff used chemicals in an unsafe manner, resulting in injury to resident
On 6/05/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Holly Williams and Charlie Yang arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPAs met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) Brandon Collins Current Census was 83. A brief interview with the FDA was conducted. Staff are mismanaging residents’ medication: During the course of the investigation, LPA Williams reviewed facility documents and conducted interviews of nine staff members and five residents. In addition, LPA reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR), PRN notes, exception records and the Controlled Substance Medication Record (CSMR). LPA observed that on 11/27/2024, the Controlled Substance Medication Record (CSMR) for R6 states Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250108121017
Apr 22, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 8, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are charging resident in excess of the rate allowed under the Medi-cal Assistance Program (ALW) Staff did not accord resident privacy and interfered with resident's visit Resident left the facility unattended due to lack of care or neglect from staff Facility staff did not safeguard resident funds
On 4/8/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Williams met with Regional Director of Operations Brandon Collins and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews with staff and residents. A brief interview was held with Brandon Collins. Allegation: Resident left the facility unattended due to lack of care or neglect from staff. It is alleged that the resident left the facility unattended. In an interview, R1 said R1 has never left the facility unattended. In an interview, Alfredo Cruz the prior administrator of Apple Ridge Assisted Living, LLC said that R1 never left the facility while Cruz was there R1 always had a staff member with R1 when leaving the facility. 3 out of 3 staff said that R1 has never left the facility without a staff member. Based on interviews and record review it is unclear if R1 left the facility unattended. [Continue on 9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241217132635
Jan 16, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility accepts residents for care however the staff cannot meet their needs. Facility staff yell at residents
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Holly Williams made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Williams met with facility administrator Charles White and together discussed the investigation details. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations. LPA Williams interviewed White, six staff members (S1-S6) and eight residents (R1-R9). In an interview, R2 said they have heard staff members yelling at residents. In an interview, S3 stated that she has heard staff members yell "just sit down!" because they were frustrated. In an interview, R9 states that staff members yell at R all the time. S1 said they had a client complain of overnight staff members have treated them residents badly. S3 stated that the facility is neglectful, and they do not treat the residents good. S3 said they are severely [Continued on 809-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241014150651
Jan 16, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Comfortable temperature is not maintained at the facility as required Facility staff are unable to assist resident in moving out of bed due to lack of staff
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams made an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPAs Williams met with facility administrator Charles White and together discussed the investigation details. This investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and record review. LPA Williams interviewed White, staff six members (S1-S6) and nine residents (R1-R9). In an interview, S2 states that they try to get the residents who have Hoyer lifts, up for at least one meal a day. In an intIn an interview, R6 states that the staff members get R6 in and out of bed with the Hoyer Lift just fine. R6 said she has no issues. In an interview, R5 said R5 needs a Hoyer Lift to get out of bed. R5 states he gets his showers on time, and he gets out of bed when R5 needs to. In an interview, R2 said the temperature is good and the place is clean. In an interview, R3 stated that the temperature is good. In an interview, R4 said the temperathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241014150651
Oct 24, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs Facility staff did not answer resident's call button Facility staff yelled at resident(s) Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident(s)
On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs It was alleged that facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs. During this investigation, the LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted interviews with both staff and residents. Interviews with nine staff members revealed that 5 out of 9 believe they can adequately address residents' incontinence care needs, yet they have observed that some colleagues on certain shifts fail to provide this care. These staff members reported instances where they found residents soiled in urine, with messes extendingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240731123011
Oct 24, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time Staff did not shower residents in care
On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time It was alleged that facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs. During this investigation, the LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted interviews with both staff and residents. Interviews with 9 staff members revealed that 5 believe they can adequately address residents' incontinence care needs, yet they have observed that some colleagues on certain shifts fail to provide this care. These staff members reported instances where they found residents soiled in urine, with messes extending from incontinence padthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240916172545
Oct 24, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs
On 10/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 83. A brief interview with FDA Cruz was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs It was alleged that facility staff did not assist residents with hygiene needs. During the course of this investigation, this LPA reviewed facility documentation and conducted staff and resident interviews. In interviews with 9 staff members, 5 out 9 expressed confidence in their ability to assist residents with hygiene but reported witnessing some colleagues neglecting these needs during certain shifts. They noted that upon starting their shifts, they often found residents soiled in urine, with messes extending from incontinence pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240709170841
Sep 19, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 19, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 19, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 3, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 29, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not pass fire inspection clearance.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Holly Williams arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Williams met with Administrator Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs Moleski and Williams obtained a fire inspection report for Apple Ridge from Cruz dated 8/22/24. LPAs Williams and Moleski reviewed the inspection report and observed many violations including, but not limited to, many fire doors which need repairs, latches, and smoke seals, and permits for change of use of a resident room. According the fire inspection report, resident room 41 was converted into a administrative office without proper permitting. LPAs Moleski and Williams reviewed a facility sketch which shows the current administrative office labeled as room number 41. LPAs Moleski and Williams were not notified regarding this change of use. In an interview, the fire inspector who authored the report said that this facility's previous fire clearance was grthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240823155140
Aug 22, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 11, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 30, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 25, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc licensed?
Yes — Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701251, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 94 residents. State records list 53 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated July 1, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.ANNADALE BUILDING FIRE CLEARANCE 82 NON-AMB, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.ALL BEDROOMS APPROVED FOR NON-AMB, BEDRIDDEN3712 AUBURN BUILDING FIRE CLEARANCE 12 BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 20. NEW MGT CO, STEAMER LANE LLC, EFFECTIVE 2/1/26.
How much does Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sacramento County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
83 of 94 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on October 31, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 64 state visits and 53 dated documents since 2023 for Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc; 18 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 31, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 64 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(916) 489-6900Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Apple Ridge Assisted Living, Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.