Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701129, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701129, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3217 Sagewood Court · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 598-8989
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (2).State service designations983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 23, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 23, 2026
Occupancy at the August 15, 2025 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 9, 2023 to August 15, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Aug 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident with requested records.

On 8-15-2025 at 2:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Jack Ibifubara and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four staff members and five residents in care. Additionally, LPA reviewed facility file documentation including various email communications, and other evidence of communication. Allegation: Staff did not provide resident with requested records. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. {Cont. on 9099C} Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250602134656
Aug 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to lack of supervision, residents engaged in a verbal/physical altercation Staff do not assist residents during the night hours

On 8-15-25 at 1:43pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived at facility unannounced to deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Jack Ibifubara and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four staff members and five residents in care. Additionally, LPA reviewed facility file documentation including facility staffing schedule, residents’ needs and services plans, admissions agreement, staff training documentation, facility care notes, various incident reports reported by facility, resident’s physician’s reports, various email communications, and other evidence of communication. LPA also conducted a facility observation on 6-5-25 as part of this investigation. Allegation: Due to lack of supervision, residents engaged in a verbal/physical altercation. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that on or about 5-1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250527111627
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction Resident not treated respectfully by staff.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. Six residents (R1-R6) and six staff members (S1-S6) were interviewed. LPA Moleski reviewed two residents' (R1 and R6) files. Jack provided LPA Moleski with copies of two eviction notices served to a resident (R1) on December 12, 2024 and January 11, 2025. LPA Moleski was provided copies of the same eviction notices, which appeared to be signed by Jack, from R1. The first notice, dated Dec. 12, 2024, indicates that R1 was to be evicted because R1 received an end-of-service notice from the agency paying for their residency as of Dec. 15. Additionally, the notice indicated that R1 was "cleared by [their] physician" and no longer needed their current level of care. Per 22 CCR Section 87224(a), a resthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241212102649
Apr 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service for resident. Staff did not provide medical attention for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski and ombudsman Ron Carrera arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski interviewed Jack, two residents (R1-R2) and two staff members (S1-S2.) In an interview, a resident (R1) alleged that they had been denied food service by a staff member (S1) on two occasions, on April 13 and 14, and that S1 had refused to provide arrangements for emergency medical services on one occasion, on April 8. R1 said that they hit their own hand while working on a project, and needed to go to the hospital. During that same interview, however, R1 said that another staff member (S2) did provide meals to them, and said that S1 did dial 911 on their behalf. R1 said that R2 witnessed at least one of these incidents and could corroborate their allegations. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250414162751
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 6 documents
Aug 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with ambulating

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived to conduct an unannounced complaint visit to conclude teh investigation on 8/2/24 at 9:45a. LPA met with Ibifubara Jack, Administrator and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews of 2 caregivers, Administrator and resident #2 regarding Resident #1 (R1) on 5/20/24. Regarding allegation, “Staff did not assist resident with ambulating”, LPA conducted interviews of residents who were present during todays visit. All residents and staff that were interviewed confirmed that the Air Conditioner is used as well as fans to keep the facility cool on hot days. R5 stated awareness that R1 would consume alcohol. LPA obtained information through interviews that S1 on 5/15/24 was checking on R1 who was initially on the bed then once returned S1 observed R1 to be on the floor. S1 asked if R1 had been drinking and R1 replied yes at which time S1 took photos of R1 to submit to the responsible party. R1 was not interviewed due to hothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240517081550
Apr 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Jack, five residents (R1-R5), and four staff members (S1-S4). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and S1’s file. S1 was disassociated from this facility’s roster as of January 15, 2024. In interviews, R1 said that S1 pulled R1’s hair and hit R1 in the face. R1 was able to identify S1 as the alleged abuser based on a photograph of S1. LPA Moleski did not observe any bruises or other apparent injuries on R1. In an interview, S1 denied the allegations. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240116082714
Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff slapped resident in the face

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski spoke with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. Jack said staff member Doria Ofori could sign this report in his absence. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Jack, six residents (R1-R6), and two staff members (S1-S2). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and S1’s file. In an interview, R1 said that, on or around December 5, 2023, S1 slapped him in the face in the facility’s backyard area. There were no witnesses to the event, according to R1. In an interview, S1 said that she yelled at R1, but did not hit him. In an interview, S2 said she had not witnessed S1 hitting any residents. In interviews, R2-R5 said they had not witnessed staff become physically violent with residents. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231206152114
Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member did not treat resident with dignity and respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed administrators Ibifubara Jack and Linda Jack, six residents (R1-R6), and two staff members (S1-S2). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and S1’s file. In an interview, R1 said that, around the end of November 2023, R1 had told S1 that R1 wanted to kill himself. In response, S1 told R1 that she would help him, according to R1. R1 also said that S1 verbally abused him regularly, that she yelled at him and cursed at him. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231215145234
Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations4typical 0
Substantiated complaints6typical 0
Total complaints9typical 0
State visits on file27typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025563202456120232302022560
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 598-8989

Is Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood licensed?

Yes — Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701129, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (2).

How much does Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on August 15, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2022 for Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 15, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident with requested records.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8-15-2025 at 2:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Jack Ibifubara and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four staff members and five residents in care. Additionally, LPA reviewed facility file documentation including various email communications, and other evidence of communication. Allegation: Staff did not provide resident with requested records. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. {Cont. on 9099C} SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250602134656
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to lack of supervision, residents engaged in a verbal/physical altercation Staff do not assist residents during the night hours
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8-15-25 at 1:43pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived at facility unannounced to deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Jack Ibifubara and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four staff members and five residents in care. Additionally, LPA reviewed facility file documentation including facility staffing schedule, residents’ needs and services plans, admissions agreement, staff training documentation, facility care notes, various incident reports reported by facility, resident’s physician’s reports, various email communications, and other evidence of communication. LPA also conducted a facility observation on 6-5-25 as part of this investigation. Allegation: Due to lack of supervision, residents engaged in a verbal/physical altercation. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that on or about 5-1CDSS inspection report, August 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250527111627
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal eviction Resident not treated respectfully by staff.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. Six residents (R1-R6) and six staff members (S1-S6) were interviewed. LPA Moleski reviewed two residents' (R1 and R6) files. Jack provided LPA Moleski with copies of two eviction notices served to a resident (R1) on December 12, 2024 and January 11, 2025. LPA Moleski was provided copies of the same eviction notices, which appeared to be signed by Jack, from R1. The first notice, dated Dec. 12, 2024, indicates that R1 was to be evicted because R1 received an end-of-service notice from the agency paying for their residency as of Dec. 15. Additionally, the notice indicated that R1 was "cleared by [their] physician" and no longer needed their current level of care. Per 22 CCR Section 87224(a), a resCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241212102649
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate food service for resident. Staff did not provide medical attention for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski and ombudsman Ron Carrera arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski interviewed Jack, two residents (R1-R2) and two staff members (S1-S2.) In an interview, a resident (R1) alleged that they had been denied food service by a staff member (S1) on two occasions, on April 13 and 14, and that S1 had refused to provide arrangements for emergency medical services on one occasion, on April 8. R1 said that they hit their own hand while working on a project, and needed to go to the hospital. During that same interview, however, R1 said that another staff member (S2) did provide meals to them, and said that S1 did dial 911 on their behalf. R1 said that R2 witnessed at least one of these incidents and could corroborate their allegations. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250414162751

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with ambulating
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived to conduct an unannounced complaint visit to conclude teh investigation on 8/2/24 at 9:45a. LPA met with Ibifubara Jack, Administrator and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews of 2 caregivers, Administrator and resident #2 regarding Resident #1 (R1) on 5/20/24. Regarding allegation, “Staff did not assist resident with ambulating”, LPA conducted interviews of residents who were present during todays visit. All residents and staff that were interviewed confirmed that the Air Conditioner is used as well as fans to keep the facility cool on hot days. R5 stated awareness that R1 would consume alcohol. LPA obtained information through interviews that S1 on 5/15/24 was checking on R1 who was initially on the bed then once returned S1 observed R1 to be on the floor. S1 asked if R1 had been drinking and R1 replied yes at which time S1 took photos of R1 to submit to the responsible party. R1 was not interviewed due to hoCDSS inspection report, August 2, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240517081550
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Jack, five residents (R1-R5), and four staff members (S1-S4). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and S1’s file. S1 was disassociated from this facility’s roster as of January 15, 2024. In interviews, R1 said that S1 pulled R1’s hair and hit R1 in the face. R1 was able to identify S1 as the alleged abuser based on a photograph of S1. LPA Moleski did not observe any bruises or other apparent injuries on R1. In an interview, S1 denied the allegations. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240116082714
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff slapped resident in the face
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski spoke with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. Jack said staff member Doria Ofori could sign this report in his absence. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Jack, six residents (R1-R6), and two staff members (S1-S2). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and S1’s file. In an interview, R1 said that, on or around December 5, 2023, S1 slapped him in the face in the facility’s backyard area. There were no witnesses to the event, according to R1. In an interview, S1 said that she yelled at R1, but did not hit him. In an interview, S2 said she had not witnessed S1 hitting any residents. In interviews, R2-R5 said they had not witnessed staff become physically violent with residents. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231206152114
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member did not treat resident with dignity and respect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Ibifubara Jack and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed administrators Ibifubara Jack and Linda Jack, six residents (R1-R6), and two staff members (S1-S2). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file and S1’s file. In an interview, R1 said that, around the end of November 2023, R1 had told S1 that R1 wanted to kill himself. In response, S1 told R1 that she would help him, according to R1. R1 also said that S1 verbally abused him regularly, that she yelled at him and cursed at him. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 11, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231215145234

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal rights: 1) Staff handled resident in a rough manner 2) Facility staff slept in resident's bed without consent.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood on 2/9/23 at 1:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Administrator and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated because former resident had no recollection of living at this facility and no recollection of any issues with staff. Former resident was able to identify issues at a previous room and board but not this facility. No other residents interviewed expressed no concerns or conflict with staff members or other residents. Staff interviewed also denied the allegations. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Personal Rights are unsuCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2023 · control 27-AS-20221103160356

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Serenity Care Villa Llc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 598-8989
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Serenity Care Villa - Sagewood? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.