Regency Place is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701107, licensed for 61 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 30, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 23, 2023 to October 17, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jun 30, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 30, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 2, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 14, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 28, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 17, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled briefs for extended periods. Staff left resident in the same clothing for extended periods. Staff did not meet resident’s dietary needs resulting in weight loss. Staff consumed resident’s personal food items.
On 10/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst, Arvin Villanueva (LPA) arrived unannounced to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegations noted above. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Damion Anderson (AD), and stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation - staff left resident in soiled briefs for extended periods: The investigation into this allegation consisted of record reviews, interviews and observation. Record showed that Resident 1 (R1) was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s dementia and is noted in physician reports dated 11/14/24 and 11/22/23 as being dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), including toileting. R1 was assessed to be incontinent of bowel and bladder. Facility assessments dated 11/30/23 and 8/1/24 show that R1 requires total assistance with toileting and receives incontinence care with extensive checks and/or changes daily. R1 is also checked on at least four times per shift. {1 of 5} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241216143525
Oct 9, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 17, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls and injuries including a fracture. Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to the residents.
On 9/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst, Arvin Villanueva (LPA) arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a follow-up complaint visit regarding the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator, Damion Anderson (S1) and stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation - Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls and injuries including a fracture: The investigation into this allegation included a review of resident R1’s medical and facility records, as well as interviews. {9099-1} Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241216143525
Jul 21, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident in care sustained multiple unexplained injuries Staff left resident on the ground for an extended period of time Staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care resulting in fall Staff did not provide activities to residents in care Staff did not report incident to resident's authorized representative
On 07/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility unannounced to present findings for a complaint. LPA Campbell met with Vandita Chand, Resident Services Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that resident in care sustained multiple unexplained injuries, when contacted, F2 reported that their family member's fall was a result of R2's refusal to use a walker and that the falls decreased when she stopped being "stubborn". F3 reported that R3 did not have an abundance of falls and F3 could only recount 3 falls over the past year. Regarding the allegation that staff left resident on the ground for an extended period of time and staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care resulting in falls, R1 was identified in the complaint as a resident who was left on the ground as witnessed by F1. However, when contacted, F1 reported no such event and stated that staff contact her and leave messages whenever R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250210142741
Jun 27, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 11, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff are aggressive towards residents in care. Facility is not adequately staffed to meet the needs of residents in care.
On 3/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegations noted above. LPA met with Damion Anderson, Executive Director/Administrator, and stated the purpose of this visit. Allegation: Facility staff are aggressive towards residents in care. The investigation into this allegation included interviews with staff and an Ombudsman, as well as direct observations during facility visits. Interviews with staff members (S5-S9) revealed that none of them had observed any instances of staff being aggressive towards residents in care. S5 provided additional insight, noting that some residents, particularly in the Memory Care area, have hearing deficiencies and may not wear their hearing aids. As a result, staff sometimes raise their voices to ensure that these residents can hear them. {1 of 3} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241112131122
Jan 7, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Questionable death Resident sustained pressure injury due to neglect Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident in care Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care
On 01/07/25 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Resident Services Director, Alvin Gaoat and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 81. It was alleged that there is a questionable death of a resident in care. This investigation consisted of records reviewed. Based on resident 1 (R1)’s death certificate it was list that the cause of death was Parkinson’s disease with onset to “years.” Records also revealed that other significant conditions contributing to R1’s death but not resulting in the underlying cause of death were vascular dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R1 was placed on hospice care on 10/25/22 and passed away on 12/21/22. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA was unablethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2025 · control 27-AS-20240402153118
Nov 14, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 8, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements
On 10/8/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings for a complaint investigation regarding the allegation above. LPA met with Resident Services Director Alvin Gaoat and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on interviews and records review, it was learned that the facility did not follow the reporting requirement as required. The following incidents were not reported: On 5/22/2022, resident (R1) was rushed to the hospital and diagnosed with an UTI. On 9/23/2022, R1 was diagnosed with a fracture on the right pelvic hip at Sacramento Methodist Hospital. There were no incident reports found of any unwitnessed falls related to this injury. On 12/1/2022, R1’s family discovered a laceration on the R1’s right knee. Based on records review, there were no incident reports pertaining to the incident above being sent to Licensing. As a result othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240402153118
Aug 23, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 2, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 24, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Regency Place licensed?
Yes — Regency Place is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701107, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 61 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Regency Place care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Regency Place with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 61 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT LLC, EFFECTIVE 6/24/26.
How much does Regency Place cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Regency Place's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Regency Place accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Regency Place is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
52 of 61 beds occupied (85%) when the state visited on October 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Regency Place?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2021 for Regency Place; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(916) 681-7800Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Regency Place? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.