Oakmont Of Carmichael is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Carmichael, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700751, licensed for 101 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

24 homes in view

Oakmont Of Carmichael

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 101 residents · Carmichael, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700751, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4717 Engle Road · Carmichael, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 483-3800
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 101 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 101 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ON THE 1ST AND 2ND FLOORS. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS IN THE DEMENTIA CARE WING. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 2, 2026
Occupancy at the December 16, 2025 visit
74 of 101 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 11, 2022 to December 16, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff physically abused resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday December 16, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Lyndee and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed management and staff regarding the incident. LPA learned the following: On 11/28/2025, S1 and S2 were assisting R1 with morning care. As R1 was getting out of bed, R1 slapped and scratched S2. S1 let go of R1’s arm. S2 was holding on to R1’s arm and bracing the back of their head so they wouldn’t fall backwards. Staff were then later able to assist R1 with incontinence care, dressing, and grooming. R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and a history of combative behavior. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251208131000
Dec 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff disturbing resident’s sleep.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Wednesday November 5, 2025, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Natalie and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed management and care staff including AM, PM, and NOC shift. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff disturbing resident’s sleep. Staff interviews stated that they provide incontinent care for residents on a schedule, and as needed. NOC shift will provide care for residents throughout the night. As part of their assigned duties, staff provide routine incontinence care for residents. Additionally, there are four residents who staff are assigned to wake up and provide dressing/grooming assistance before their end of shift. Once the AM shift arrives, they provide dressing/grooming assistance for the remainder of the residents so that everyone is dressed Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251020165401
Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. -Staff did not ensure a comfortable environment was provided for residents. -Staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner. -Licensee did not ensure faucets for personal care delivered hot water. -Staff did not ensure facility cleanliness was maintained. -Staff were not adequately trained to care for residents with dementia. -Staff did not adequately assist resident with repositioning. -Staff did not provide quality food service to residents.

On 1/15/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Executive Director. LPAs conducted 3 inspections of the facility, facility and resident records were reviewed and interviews conducted of resident families, caregivers and managers. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Evidence available did not reveal unmet needs of residents in memeory care in a timely manor. The department conducted a review of memory care residents' service plans and care records and found care provided for identified needs. Regulation requires room temperatures be maintained by heating rooms that residents occupy to a minimum of 68 degree F, (20 degrees C) and cool rooms to a comfortable range, between 78 degrees F (26 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C). Inspections found that temperatures were maintained within required ranges when LPAs were present. Unsuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240926163237
20243 state visits · 3 documents
May 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 1/11/24, and met with the Executive Director, Luis Olivas, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the allegation listed above. During a separate complaint investigation #59-AS-20230918125748 concluded on 12/1/23, it was discovered that care staff did not ensure that resident (R7) was receiving hourly checks as indicated in their care plan. It was also discovered that residents’ call button alerts were not responded to in a timely manner. Due to facility receiving a citation regarding the same violation in a separate complaint investigation conducted on 12/1/23, no additional citations will be issued regarding allegation. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation was found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies were cited during a separate compthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 59-AS-20230927093334
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff do not ensure records are properly maintained -Staff do not ensure care needs of resident are being properly met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived unannounced at the care home today, 12/1/23, and met with the Executive Director, Kathleen Gilbey, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above listed allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Allegations: Staff do not ensure records are properly maintained and staff do not ensure care needs of resident are being properly met. The relevant party indicated that staff were not documenting when hourly checks were being conducted for resident (R1). The log being used to document the hourly checks was being pre-filled by staff. Also, staff were not responding timely or at all when R1 would push their call button on their pendant. *********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*************************************************** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230918125748
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025670202433120234422022771
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 483-3800

Is Oakmont Of Carmichael licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of Carmichael is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Carmichael (Sacramento County): California license #342700751, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 101 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakmont Of Carmichael care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Carmichael with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 101 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ON THE 1ST AND 2ND FLOORS. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS IN THE DEMENTIA CARE WING. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.

How much does Oakmont Of Carmichael cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Carmichael's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of Carmichael accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of Carmichael is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

74 of 101 beds occupied (73%) when the state visited on December 16, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Carmichael?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2022 for Oakmont Of Carmichael; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 16, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff physically abused resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday December 16, 2025, to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Lyndee and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed management and staff regarding the incident. LPA learned the following: On 11/28/2025, S1 and S2 were assisting R1 with morning care. As R1 was getting out of bed, R1 slapped and scratched S2. S1 let go of R1’s arm. S2 was holding on to R1’s arm and bracing the back of their head so they wouldn’t fall backwards. Staff were then later able to assist R1 with incontinence care, dressing, and grooming. R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and a history of combative behavior. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251208131000
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff disturbing resident’s sleep.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Wednesday November 5, 2025, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Natalie and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed management and care staff including AM, PM, and NOC shift. LPA learned the following: Allegation: Staff disturbing resident’s sleep. Staff interviews stated that they provide incontinent care for residents on a schedule, and as needed. NOC shift will provide care for residents throughout the night. As part of their assigned duties, staff provide routine incontinence care for residents. Additionally, there are four residents who staff are assigned to wake up and provide dressing/grooming assistance before their end of shift. Once the AM shift arrives, they provide dressing/grooming assistance for the remainder of the residents so that everyone is dressed UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, November 5, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251020165401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. -Staff did not ensure a comfortable environment was provided for residents. -Staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner. -Licensee did not ensure faucets for personal care delivered hot water. -Staff did not ensure facility cleanliness was maintained. -Staff were not adequately trained to care for residents with dementia. -Staff did not adequately assist resident with repositioning. -Staff did not provide quality food service to residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/15/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Executive Director. LPAs conducted 3 inspections of the facility, facility and resident records were reviewed and interviews conducted of resident families, caregivers and managers. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Evidence available did not reveal unmet needs of residents in memeory care in a timely manor. The department conducted a review of memory care residents' service plans and care records and found care provided for identified needs. Regulation requires room temperatures be maintained by heating rooms that residents occupy to a minimum of 68 degree F, (20 degrees C) and cool rooms to a comfortable range, between 78 degrees F (26 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C). Inspections found that temperatures were maintained within required ranges when LPAs were present. UnsuCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240926163237

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 1/11/24, and met with the Executive Director, Luis Olivas, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the allegation listed above. During a separate complaint investigation #59-AS-20230918125748 concluded on 12/1/23, it was discovered that care staff did not ensure that resident (R7) was receiving hourly checks as indicated in their care plan. It was also discovered that residents’ call button alerts were not responded to in a timely manner. Due to facility receiving a citation regarding the same violation in a separate complaint investigation conducted on 12/1/23, no additional citations will be issued regarding allegation. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation was found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies were cited during a separate compCDSS inspection report, January 11, 2024 · control 59-AS-20230927093334

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff do not ensure records are properly maintained -Staff do not ensure care needs of resident are being properly met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived unannounced at the care home today, 12/1/23, and met with the Executive Director, Kathleen Gilbey, to deliver complaint investigation findings into the above listed allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Allegations: Staff do not ensure records are properly maintained and staff do not ensure care needs of resident are being properly met. The relevant party indicated that staff were not documenting when hourly checks were being conducted for resident (R1). The log being used to document the hourly checks was being pre-filled by staff. Also, staff were not responding timely or at all when R1 would push their call button on their pendant. *********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*************************************************** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230918125748
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained injuries from a fall while in care due to lack of supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/12/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived, met with the Executive Director, and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of this inspection was to investigate the allegations sited above. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly received copies of the following: the internal incident report of a fall by R1 on 12/18/22 (recorded previously as 12/19/22- 12/18/23 is the correct date), Hospice record of care provided for the injuries from that fall, name of the caregiver(s) who attended to R1 or witnessed the incident (if no longer employed, contact information on record) if still employed, April 2023 work schedules. LPA observed R1 receiving assistance while dining. LPA interviewed 4 staff and a hospice RN. Hospice Visit notes for R1, on 12/18/22 note "...new laceration... roughly 1 cm long... wound started to scab... no signs of bleeding or infection... cleaned... ATB ointment applied..." - Report continued UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221227151037
Facility Evaluation ReportAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedto be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The followingCDSS inspection report, April 7, 2023

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 483-3800
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of Carmichael? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.