Eskaton Village is a continuing-care retirement community in Carmichael, Sacramento County, California — state license #340313383, licensed for 500 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

18 homes in view

Eskaton Village

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Continuing-care retirement community · Large community, 500 residents · Carmichael, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #340313383, held since 1992 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3939 Walnut Ave · Carmichael, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 974-2000
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGES 60 AND OLDER. 482 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 13 RESIDENTS.State service designation938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)the CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 20, 2026
Occupancy at the February 20, 2026 visit
438 of 500 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 23, 2022 to February 20, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff do not respond to resident's calls for assistance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Resident Care Director, Chantel Krahn, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. Interviews with residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6) indicated that staff respond to their calls for assistance. Interviews with residents indicated that staff respond to their calls for assistance quickly. According to R1's device activity report dated January 19, 2026-February 8, 2026, staff responded to all calls for assistance. Staff schedules for the months of January-February 2026 indicated that the facility is fully staffed for all shifts. Based on interviews conducted and documentation obtained, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260206110346
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect -Staff withhold food from resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Healthcare Administrator, Sean Beloud, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Facility provided LPA their internal investigation, which did not indicate any findings of staff treating residents with a lack of dignity or respect, as well as staff withholding food from residents in care. Interviews with staff (S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) indicated that they have never witnessed staff treating residents with a lack of dignity or respect. Residents (R1, R2, and R3) indicated that staff treat them well and are meeting all their needs. R2 and R3 indicated that staff are respectful. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*********************************************** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250502112328
Jun 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Facility staff are not changing bandage as ordered by home health

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 12/16/24, and met with the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Chantel Krahn, to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above stated allegation. During today's visit, LPA reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation and conducted interviews. Interviews with RCC and Home Health Nurse indicated that Resident (R1) is to receive wound care two times per week for a skin biopsy on the right foot. Home Health Nurse indicated that they typically only provide wound care for residents 2-3 times per week and anything more would need a signed physician's order. Home Health Nurse indicated that when the initial assessment was conducted with R1 it was agreed that they would be providing wound care two times per week. Home Health Nurse did not indicate ********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*************************************************** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241212093901
Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not seek medical care in a timely manner for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 9/19/24, and met with the Resident Care Coordinator, Chantel Krahn, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*************************************************** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240524160147
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing resident with incontinence care. Staff did not respond to resident’s call button.

On 4/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Chantel Krahn, Resident Care Coordinator, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. LPA Mknelly reviewed the Observation Detail List (ODL) assessment of needed services for residents who reside in Hall 1 of assisted living (rooms 16-40), as well as the call system Device Activity Report (DAR) for assisted living for the dates of 2/11/24- 2/18/24. For the ODL’s provided for review on 2/29/24, 3 residents are identified as needing Level 4 assistance, 8 residents require Level 3 assistance, 3 require Level 2 assistance and 2 residents do not require more than basic services. Report continued. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240215152024
Mar 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility fire alarm is in disrepair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Monday March 4, 2024, to complete and deliver findings for a complaint received on 1/10/2024. LPA met with Administrator Greg and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and Campus Patrol. LPA reviewed fire watch logs and emails between the facility and the Fire Department. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA learned that between 1/9/2024 and 1/10/2024, there were two false fire alarms that occurred at the facility. The facility learned that one fire detector was defective and immediately replaced the device. A few hours later, the facility learned that the replacement device was defective and replace it. Therefore, there were two false alarms. The facility immediately initiated fire watch (for approximately 20 hours) and supplied the logs to the Fire Department. Separately, the facility has a long-term project, which has been Unsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240110121302
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Inspections, records and interviews found that in addition to the failure on the parts of S3 and S4 to properly prepare the food for R1 on 3/11/23, the investigation also found: S3’s and S4’s incid ents of, as their terminations letters state- “ multiple residents have received food that was not appropriately prepared”- had not been addressed in supervisor action prior to the incident on 3/11/23; that the procedures in place did not address individual meal verification when delivered to resident rooms; and that S1 was not provided appropriate training regarding R1’s dietary needs and assistance with cutting food. This constituted a failure on the part of the administrator to provide or ensure the provision of services to the residents with appropriate regard for the residents' physical and mental well-being and need. Furthermore, the incident report and death report provided by the licensee to investigators failed to be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified and did not include the nature of event and disposition of the case. SUPERVISORS NAME : Maribeth Senty LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME : Kevin Mknelly LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE : DATE: 09/13/2023 I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: DATE: 09/13/2023 This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC809 (FAS) - (06/04) Page: 1 of 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT (Cont) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION SACRAMENTO NORTH ASC , 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100 SACRAMENTO , CA 95827 FACILITY NAME: ESKATON VILLAGE FACILITY NUMBER: 340313383 VISIT DATE: 09/13/2023 NARRATIVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following

Inspections, records and interviews found that in addition to the failure on the parts of S3 and S4 to properly prepare the food for R1 on 3/11/23, the investigation also found: S3’s and S4’s incid ents of, as their terminations letters state- “ multiple residents have received food that was not appropriately prepared”- had not been addressed in supervisor action prior to the incident on 3/11/23; that the procedures in place did not address individual meal verification when delivered to resident rooms; and that S1 was not provided appropriate training regarding R1’s dietary needs and assistance with cutting food. This constituted a failure on the part of the administrator to provide or ensure the provision of services to the residents with appropriate regard for the residents' physical and mental well-being and need. Furthermore, the incident report and death report provided by the licensee to investigators failed to be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible fothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not adhere to Resident’s special diet. Facility staff did not provide care and supervision during meals which resulted in resident death.

On 9/13/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived unannounced and spoke to Greg Klick, Executive Director, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. The Department reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. The Department finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. It was determined that on 3/11/23, R1 was provided a meal in their room that contained large pieces of meat. R1 had physician’s orders in place for a mechanical soft diet. Staff, S1, delivered the food to R1’s room and left it unattended while R1 was in the restroom. S1 left the food unattended in order to empty the trash. While S1 was not present, R1 attempted to eat the food which had been delivered, R1 choked on the food left and was found by a medication technician, S2, a short time later. S1 returned to find R1 choking and attended to by S2. CPR was provided and emergency responders were called. Emergency responders found and dislodged a pithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230320100736
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file22typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1992.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020254402024551202335320224502021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 974-2000

Is Eskaton Village licensed?

Yes — Eskaton Village is a licensed continuing-care retirement community in Carmichael (Sacramento County): California license #340313383, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 500 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Eskaton Village care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Eskaton Village with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGES 60 AND OLDER. 482 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 13 RESIDENTS.

How much does Eskaton Village cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Eskaton Village's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Eskaton Village accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Eskaton Village is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

438 of 500 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on February 20, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Eskaton Village?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Eskaton Village; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 20, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff do not respond to resident's calls for assistance
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Resident Care Director, Chantel Krahn, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. Interviews with residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6) indicated that staff respond to their calls for assistance. Interviews with residents indicated that staff respond to their calls for assistance quickly. According to R1's device activity report dated January 19, 2026-February 8, 2026, staff responded to all calls for assistance. Staff schedules for the months of January-February 2026 indicated that the facility is fully staffed for all shifts. Based on interviews conducted and documentation obtained, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the reportCDSS inspection report, February 20, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260206110346

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect -Staff withhold food from resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Healthcare Administrator, Sean Beloud, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Facility provided LPA their internal investigation, which did not indicate any findings of staff treating residents with a lack of dignity or respect, as well as staff withholding food from residents in care. Interviews with staff (S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) indicated that they have never witnessed staff treating residents with a lack of dignity or respect. Residents (R1, R2, and R3) indicated that staff treat them well and are meeting all their needs. R2 and R3 indicated that staff are respectful. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*********************************************** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 14, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250502112328

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff are not changing bandage as ordered by home health
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 12/16/24, and met with the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Chantel Krahn, to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above stated allegation. During today's visit, LPA reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation and conducted interviews. Interviews with RCC and Home Health Nurse indicated that Resident (R1) is to receive wound care two times per week for a skin biopsy on the right foot. Home Health Nurse indicated that they typically only provide wound care for residents 2-3 times per week and anything more would need a signed physician's order. Home Health Nurse indicated that when the initial assessment was conducted with R1 it was agreed that they would be providing wound care two times per week. Home Health Nurse did not indicate ********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*************************************************** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241212093901
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not seek medical care in a timely manner for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today, 9/19/24, and met with the Resident Care Coordinator, Chantel Krahn, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C*************************************************** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240524160147
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing resident with incontinence care. Staff did not respond to resident’s call button.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 4/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Chantel Krahn, Resident Care Coordinator, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. LPA Mknelly reviewed the Observation Detail List (ODL) assessment of needed services for residents who reside in Hall 1 of assisted living (rooms 16-40), as well as the call system Device Activity Report (DAR) for assisted living for the dates of 2/11/24- 2/18/24. For the ODL’s provided for review on 2/29/24, 3 residents are identified as needing Level 4 assistance, 8 residents require Level 3 assistance, 3 require Level 2 assistance and 2 residents do not require more than basic services. Report continued. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240215152024
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility fire alarm is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Monday March 4, 2024, to complete and deliver findings for a complaint received on 1/10/2024. LPA met with Administrator Greg and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and Campus Patrol. LPA reviewed fire watch logs and emails between the facility and the Fire Department. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA learned that between 1/9/2024 and 1/10/2024, there were two false fire alarms that occurred at the facility. The facility learned that one fire detector was defective and immediately replaced the device. A few hours later, the facility learned that the replacement device was defective and replace it. Therefore, there were two false alarms. The facility immediately initiated fire watch (for approximately 20 hours) and supplied the logs to the Fire Department. Separately, the facility has a long-term project, which has been UnsCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240110121302

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 974-2000
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Eskaton Village? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.