Gramercy Court is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700064, with a licensed capacity of 85, listed as probationary license in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 30 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

The state record lists this home as on probation. The dated documents behind that status are published below; we do not include homes on probation in family match shortlists.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Gramercy Court

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 85 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
On probation — see recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700064, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2200 Gramercy Drive · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 482-2200
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 85 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
85 NON-AMBULATORY,APPROVED FOR 15 HOSPICE.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 33 times and filed 30 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the November 26, 2025 visit
84 of 85 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 9, 2022 to November 26, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 30 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility violated a resident's personal rights by sending their medical information to an unauthorized person.

On 11/26/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to open a complaint investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED). LPA met with Designee / Wellness Nurse, Joanne Blackburn and a brief interview followed. LPA explained that it was reported to Community Care Licensing that when a responsible party for a resident, (R1) requested a copy of R1's medical file, another resident's (R2) confidential medical information was included within in it. LPA received a copy of that medical documentation for R2. LPA requested to review the medical files for R1 and R2 during today's visit. LPA and the Designee found that R2's medical information from 2023 was misfiled in R1's file. Based on interviews and a record review, the licensee did not ensure the confidentiality of record contents and made availablthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251125172322
Nov 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was treated for a scabies infection.

On 12/17/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to continue a complaint investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with Designated Facility Administrator. LPA met with Designee, Toni Jones and a brief interview followed. LPA conducted a document review and learned the following. R1 was sent to the hospital for a fall. While at the hospital, R1 was assessed by a dermatologist who determined that the rash R1 had on the lower half of R1's body was consistent with scabies. A topical medication was administered before R1 was discharged with additional medication to be administered by the facility. LPA reviewed R1's care plan. On page 6 of the care plan for R1, it stated that R1 "had bladder incontinence. Resident refuses to wear underwear or adult briefs. Staff to toilet resident every 2 hours." This part of the plan was updated 09/07/24. Substantiatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241204153321
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining serious bodily injury Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining an unwitnessed fall

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Valerio met with Administrator , and explained the purpose of the visit. On 09/05/2024, The Regional Office conducted an unannounced visit and learned Resident 1 (R1) was not a resident of the facility. On 09/05/2024, LPA Moleski could not acquire documentation regarding a resident (R1) as they are a resident of a skilled nursing facility, which is outside the jurisdiction of the Community Care Licensing Division. On 09/06/2024, complaint information was cross reported to the Department of Public Health. Based on the above noted information, the allegations are deemed Unfounded. The allegation is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This Department has therefore dismissed the complaint. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, no deficiencies were observed or cited. An exit intervthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240904110359
Aug 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff gave wrong medications to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation visit and deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio met with Skilled Nursing Administrator Nima Pourfathi and Memory Care and Assisted Living Administrator Veronica Morles, and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA Valerio interviewed staff, reviewed facility records, and observed the facility. The facility was observed to be clean, free from debris, and free from obstructions of emergency exits. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the following allegation: Staff gave wrong medications to resident in care Continues on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240405131806
Mar 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not clearly specify fees incurred to resident.

On 8/15/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to commence a complaint investigation with the allegation above. LPA met with Interim Administrator Veronica Morales and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on the investigation, it was learned that resident (R1) has never been a resident at this facility. Further investigation revealed that R1 was a resident at Gramercy Court Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) that is on the same campus. The interim administrator confirmed that R1 is a former resident of Gramercy Court SNF. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds the allegation above to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This Department has therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230809151539
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints7typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file33typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202623020254412024892202356120224512021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 482-2200

Is Gramercy Court licensed?

Yes — Gramercy Court is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County), currently on state probation: California license #342700064, shown as “Probationary License” in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 85 residents. State records list 30 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Gramercy Court care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Gramercy Court with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record85 NON-AMBULATORY,APPROVED FOR 15 HOSPICE.

How much does Gramercy Court cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Gramercy Court's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Gramercy Court accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Gramercy Court through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sacramento County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

84 of 85 beds occupied (99%) when the state visited on November 26, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Gramercy Court?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 33 state visits and 30 dated documents since 2021 for Gramercy Court; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 26, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility violated a resident's personal rights by sending their medical information to an unauthorized person.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 11/26/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to open a complaint investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED). LPA met with Designee / Wellness Nurse, Joanne Blackburn and a brief interview followed. LPA explained that it was reported to Community Care Licensing that when a responsible party for a resident, (R1) requested a copy of R1's medical file, another resident's (R2) confidential medical information was included within in it. LPA received a copy of that medical documentation for R2. LPA requested to review the medical files for R1 and R2 during today's visit. LPA and the Designee found that R2's medical information from 2023 was misfiled in R1's file. Based on interviews and a record review, the licensee did not ensure the confidentiality of record contents and made availablCDSS inspection report, November 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251125172322

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident was treated for a scabies infection.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/17/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to continue a complaint investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with Designated Facility Administrator. LPA met with Designee, Toni Jones and a brief interview followed. LPA conducted a document review and learned the following. R1 was sent to the hospital for a fall. While at the hospital, R1 was assessed by a dermatologist who determined that the rash R1 had on the lower half of R1's body was consistent with scabies. A topical medication was administered before R1 was discharged with additional medication to be administered by the facility. LPA reviewed R1's care plan. On page 6 of the care plan for R1, it stated that R1 "had bladder incontinence. Resident refuses to wear underwear or adult briefs. Staff to toilet resident every 2 hours." This part of the plan was updated 09/07/24. SubstantiatCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241204153321
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in resident sustaining serious bodily injury Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining an unwitnessed fall
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Valerio met with Administrator , and explained the purpose of the visit. On 09/05/2024, The Regional Office conducted an unannounced visit and learned Resident 1 (R1) was not a resident of the facility. On 09/05/2024, LPA Moleski could not acquire documentation regarding a resident (R1) as they are a resident of a skilled nursing facility, which is outside the jurisdiction of the Community Care Licensing Division. On 09/06/2024, complaint information was cross reported to the Department of Public Health. Based on the above noted information, the allegations are deemed Unfounded. The allegation is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This Department has therefore dismissed the complaint. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, no deficiencies were observed or cited. An exit intervCDSS inspection report, September 16, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240904110359
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff gave wrong medications to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation visit and deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio met with Skilled Nursing Administrator Nima Pourfathi and Memory Care and Assisted Living Administrator Veronica Morles, and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA Valerio interviewed staff, reviewed facility records, and observed the facility. The facility was observed to be clean, free from debris, and free from obstructions of emergency exits. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the following allegation: Staff gave wrong medications to resident in care Continues on LIC 9099 - C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240405131806

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not clearly specify fees incurred to resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 8/15/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to commence a complaint investigation with the allegation above. LPA met with Interim Administrator Veronica Morales and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on the investigation, it was learned that resident (R1) has never been a resident at this facility. Further investigation revealed that R1 was a resident at Gramercy Court Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) that is on the same campus. The interim administrator confirmed that R1 is a former resident of Gramercy Court SNF. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds the allegation above to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This Department has therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230809151539
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResidents sustained injuries while in care Due to lack of staffing residents sustain falls while in care Staff failed to meet residents' needs
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 6-22-23 at 9:54am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Kendra Noonan and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interview with previous Administrator in charge and reviewed facility file documentation for resident1 (R1) and R2. LPA also reviewed facility’s resident roster list. Based on interview and record review, it was determined that R1 and R2 are not and have not been residents of this facility, and do not have additional records to indicate previous residency of this facility. As a result of this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and these allegations are UNFOUNDED. An exit interview was conducted Staff3 (S3). Administrator Kendra Noonan gave permission for S3 to sign in her absence at the time this report was delivered. A copy of this report was provided to S3. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 22, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230519101522
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal Eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6-22-23, at 10:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to continue investigation and deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Kendra Noonan and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator and additional witness. LPA also reviewed facility file documentation pertaining to resident1 (R1) including physician’s report, admissions agreement, incident reports, resident appraisal, fall risk assessments, mini-mental exam, progress notes, and additional assessments conducted by facility staff. Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that R1 sustained a fall on 3-16-23 which resulted in hospitalization and eventual transfer to a local skilled nursing facility rehabilitation and treatment for bladder infection. It was further determined that R1's responsible party was attempting to be reamit R1 from skilled nursing but has not been re-admitted. {Cont. on 9099C}CDSS inspection report, June 22, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230522140746

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 33 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
33
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 482-2200
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Gramercy Court? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.