Desert Cottage is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Indio, Riverside County, California — state license #336413271, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 31 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 3, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Desert Cottage

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Indio, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #336413271, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
83-617 Himilaya Drive · Indio, Riverside County
Phone
(760) 342-7767
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 31 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 3, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 3, 2026
Occupancy at the December 3, 2025 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 7, 2024 to December 3, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 29 of 31 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 6 documents
Mar 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202520 state visits · 21 documents
Dec 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are restraining residents Staff are providing THC drinks/Protein powder to residents without a Physicians order Residents are charged for services not rendered Residents moved to other facilities without consent Residents are left unattended Staff put up bed rails without physicians orders

This is an amended complaint investigation report of the original report that was delivered on 05-21-2025. This amended report is created due to being longer than the original report. Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Seo Jeon and Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit to deliver amended complaint investigation report that was delivered on 05-21-2025 and met with Elizabeth Hengstler, Licensee. LPA informed them of the purpose of the visit. Throughout the investigation, LPA conducted resident and staff interviews, reviewed files and records, and obtained supporting documentation to aid in determining the findings of the noted allegations. On December 3, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCLD) received a complaint report with the following allegations. Continued on LIC9099-C..... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241203155436
Nov 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff denied resident visitors Due to staff neglect, resident had multiple unexplained bruises Staff overmedicated resident Staff did not notify authorized representative of incidents Staff increased medication without authorization

On 09/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver an amended version of the original report regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Licensee, Elizabeth Hengstler who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The alleged victim has been identified as Resident 1 (R1). Licensee Hengstler reported R1 never resided in this facility. LPA contacted R1’s responsible person who confirmed R1 never resided in this facility. LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement signed and dated 08/30/2023, noting the agreement is with a different facility located at a different address. Therefore, the allegations noted above are unfounded. Unfounded means the allegations are false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. The Department has opened a complaint at the facility R1 resided at to investigate the allegations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Confidential Names list (LICthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230922152416
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are chemically restraining residents in care. Staff are physically restraining residents in care. Food services are inadequate.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yolanda Delgado conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegations. During today’s visit, LPA Yolanda Delgado met with Elizabeth Hengstler and explained the reason for the visit. On 4/11/2024, the Riverside Adult and Senior Regional Office (RO) received a complaint regarding allegations of staff are chemically restraining residents in care, it is alleged that staff are giving THC drinks to keep residents sedated, staff are physical restraining residents in care, it is alleged that staff are placing weighted vests on residents to keep them immobile, at bedtime to keep them in bed and side rails are attached to aid in restraining, food services are inadequate, it is alleged that staff give residents protein drinks without doctors’ orders. (Continued on Page 2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240411143908
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are restraining residents Staff are proving THC drinks/Protein powder to residents without a Physicians order Staff are restricting visiting hours Residents are charged for services not rendered Residents moved to other facilities without consent Residents are left unattended Staff put up bed rails without physicians orders

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit for additional investigation and met with Destiny Villalta, Administrator. LPA informed them of the purpose of the visit. Throughout the investigation, LPA conducted resident and staff interviews, reviewed files, and records, and obtained supporting documentation to aid in determining the findings of the noted allegations. On December 3, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCLD) received a complaint report with the following allegations. It was alleged staff are restraining residents. LPA toured interior and exterior of the facility. LPA did not observe anything used to physically restrain residents. LPA interviewed (3) three residents, but no one confirmed they had experienced any form of restraint. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members, but both denied using any form of restraints on residents. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241203155436
Jan 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fracture.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings for the above listed allegation. LPA met with Licensee, Elizabeth Hengstler, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of Department conducted record reviews and interviews. The records reviewed include monthly care plans for Resident 1 (R1), the admission agreement for R1, the needs and service plan for R1, medical records for R1 and the facility Program Plan. Interviews were conducted with 3 residents, one of which was the victim, 2 family members of R1, the Ombudsman, 3 facility staff members and the facility Administrator. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220330113756
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide comfortable accommodations to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the complaint investigation regarding the allegation above. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, staff and resident interviews, and requested pertinent documents related to the investigation. Regarding the allegation "Staff did not provide comfortable accommodations to resident in care", it was reported the facility did not have comfortable accommodations and the room temperature was very hot for Resident One (R1). LPA conducted interviews with three (3) residents who denied the facility being hot and uncomfortable. During the visit, LPA observed the thermostat set at 83 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed all six (6) residents wearing cardigans or having a blanket covering them during the visit. Interview with Resident Two (R2) revealed the temperature in the facility is comfortable. Interview with R1 reported their room was always hot and staff had provided a fan to help accommodatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240930104506
Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints8typical 0
State visits on file32typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026460202520211202422020231102022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 342-7767

Is Desert Cottage licensed?

Yes — Desert Cottage is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Indio (Riverside County): California license #336413271, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 31 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 3, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Desert Cottage care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Desert Cottage with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

How much does Desert Cottage cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Desert Cottage's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Desert Cottage accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Desert Cottage through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on December 3, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Desert Cottage?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 31 dated documents since 2022 for Desert Cottage; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 3, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are restraining residents Staff are providing THC drinks/Protein powder to residents without a Physicians order Residents are charged for services not rendered Residents moved to other facilities without consent Residents are left unattended Staff put up bed rails without physicians orders
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This is an amended complaint investigation report of the original report that was delivered on 05-21-2025. This amended report is created due to being longer than the original report. Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Seo Jeon and Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit to deliver amended complaint investigation report that was delivered on 05-21-2025 and met with Elizabeth Hengstler, Licensee. LPA informed them of the purpose of the visit. Throughout the investigation, LPA conducted resident and staff interviews, reviewed files and records, and obtained supporting documentation to aid in determining the findings of the noted allegations. On December 3, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCLD) received a complaint report with the following allegations. Continued on LIC9099-C..... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241203155436
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff denied resident visitors Due to staff neglect, resident had multiple unexplained bruises Staff overmedicated resident Staff did not notify authorized representative of incidents Staff increased medication without authorization
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 09/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver an amended version of the original report regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Licensee, Elizabeth Hengstler who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The alleged victim has been identified as Resident 1 (R1). Licensee Hengstler reported R1 never resided in this facility. LPA contacted R1’s responsible person who confirmed R1 never resided in this facility. LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement signed and dated 08/30/2023, noting the agreement is with a different facility located at a different address. Therefore, the allegations noted above are unfounded. Unfounded means the allegations are false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. The Department has opened a complaint at the facility R1 resided at to investigate the allegations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Confidential Names list (LICCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230922152416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are chemically restraining residents in care. Staff are physically restraining residents in care. Food services are inadequate.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yolanda Delgado conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegations. During today’s visit, LPA Yolanda Delgado met with Elizabeth Hengstler and explained the reason for the visit. On 4/11/2024, the Riverside Adult and Senior Regional Office (RO) received a complaint regarding allegations of staff are chemically restraining residents in care, it is alleged that staff are giving THC drinks to keep residents sedated, staff are physical restraining residents in care, it is alleged that staff are placing weighted vests on residents to keep them immobile, at bedtime to keep them in bed and side rails are attached to aid in restraining, food services are inadequate, it is alleged that staff give residents protein drinks without doctors’ orders. (Continued on Page 2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240411143908
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are restraining residents Staff are proving THC drinks/Protein powder to residents without a Physicians order Staff are restricting visiting hours Residents are charged for services not rendered Residents moved to other facilities without consent Residents are left unattended Staff put up bed rails without physicians orders
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit for additional investigation and met with Destiny Villalta, Administrator. LPA informed them of the purpose of the visit. Throughout the investigation, LPA conducted resident and staff interviews, reviewed files, and records, and obtained supporting documentation to aid in determining the findings of the noted allegations. On December 3, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCLD) received a complaint report with the following allegations. It was alleged staff are restraining residents. LPA toured interior and exterior of the facility. LPA did not observe anything used to physically restrain residents. LPA interviewed (3) three residents, but no one confirmed they had experienced any form of restraint. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members, but both denied using any form of restraints on residents. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20241203155436
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fracture.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings for the above listed allegation. LPA met with Licensee, Elizabeth Hengstler, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of Department conducted record reviews and interviews. The records reviewed include monthly care plans for Resident 1 (R1), the admission agreement for R1, the needs and service plan for R1, medical records for R1 and the facility Program Plan. Interviews were conducted with 3 residents, one of which was the victim, 2 family members of R1, the Ombudsman, 3 facility staff members and the facility Administrator. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220330113756

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide comfortable accommodations to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the complaint investigation regarding the allegation above. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, staff and resident interviews, and requested pertinent documents related to the investigation. Regarding the allegation "Staff did not provide comfortable accommodations to resident in care", it was reported the facility did not have comfortable accommodations and the room temperature was very hot for Resident One (R1). LPA conducted interviews with three (3) residents who denied the facility being hot and uncomfortable. During the visit, LPA observed the thermostat set at 83 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed all six (6) residents wearing cardigans or having a blanket covering them during the visit. Interview with Resident Two (R2) revealed the temperature in the facility is comfortable. Interview with R1 reported their room was always hot and staff had provided a fan to help accommodateCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240930104506

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
32
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 342-7767
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Desert Cottage? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.