Brookdale Murrieta is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Murrieta, Riverside County, California — state license #336413087, licensed for 82 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 26, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Brookdale Murrieta

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 82 residents · Murrieta, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #336413087, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
24350 Jackson Ave · Murrieta, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 696-5753
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 82 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 9 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
82 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR NINE (9).State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 26, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 26, 2026
Occupancy at the March 3, 2026 visit
65 of 82 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 10, 2023 to March 3, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from inappropriately touching another resident in care.

On 3/3/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose launching the complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Cindy Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. Information received alleged staff did not prevent Resident #2 (R2) from inappropriately touching Resident #1 (R1). Interviews conducted with facility staff report that R1 had a history of making false allegations against other residents in care. Staff reported that on 10/25/2025, R1 alleged an unknown staff member enter into R1’s room and sexually assaulted R1. It was reported that Executive Director (ED) contacted the local police department, and an investigation was conducted pertaining to the incident. Interviews with staff and R1’s responsible person reported that R1 had a surveillance camera in R1’s room which was monitored by R1’s responsible person. (Continue to LIC9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260223172841
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff not meeting resident toileting needs. Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Celia Saldivar and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 7/5/23 LPA Mixson conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed 4 residents and 5 staff, and requested pertaining documents. On 10/27/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested copies of physician’s report, service plan, admission agreement, medication list, notes, incident reports for resident #1(R1). On 10/29/25 LPA Flores conducted interviews over the phone with 5 staff. On 10/30/25 LPA conducted interviews with 3 residents over the phone. On 11/3/25 LPA Flores interviewed 3 additional residents and conducted a tour of the facility during another complaint investigation. On 11/4/25 LPA delivered findings for the above allegations. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230629115702
Nov 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was bathed Staff did not provide adequate housekeeping services to resident Staff did not provide resident transportation to medical appointments

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Cindy Garcia and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/1/23 LPA Shaw Ross conducted an initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed 4 staff, 1 resident, and requested the pertaining documents. On 10/27/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested copies of physician’s report, service plan, admission agreement, notes, incident reports for resident #1(R1). On 10/29/25 LPA Flores conducted interviews over the phone with 5 staff. On 10/30/25 LPA Flores interviewed 3 residents over the phone. On 11/3/25 LPA Flores conducted a facility tour and observed 6 randomly chosen resident bedrooms, interviewed 3 additional residents and delivered findings for the above allegations. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident was bathed. It is allthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231128085956
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are overcharging resident in care. Staff do not provide resident with an itemized list of charges.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jacqueline Shaw Ross made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Celia Saldivar, Business Office Coordinator and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, interviews, and records review. On 08/02/2023, Community Care Licensing received an allegation that staff are overcharging resident in care and staff do not provide resident with an itemized list of charges. R1 and his wife (R2) share a unit at the facility together. It was alleged that R1 noticed what appeared to be a double charge on their bank statement of Personal Service charges for May 2023. Per interview with R1, stated they did not understand the charges and expressed that staff in the facility seemed unwilling to explain charges to him. LPA interviewed both R1 and R2, as well as reviewed their bank statement. Cont'd on LIC9099C.... Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230802133907
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file14typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025220202411020235512022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2023 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 696-5753

Is Brookdale Murrieta licensed?

Yes — Brookdale Murrieta is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Murrieta (Riverside County): California license #336413087, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 82 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 26, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brookdale Murrieta care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Murrieta with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record82 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR NINE (9).

How much does Brookdale Murrieta cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Murrieta's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Murrieta accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Murrieta is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

65 of 82 beds occupied (79%) when the state visited on March 3, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Murrieta?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2022 for Brookdale Murrieta; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 3, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent a resident from inappropriately touching another resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 3/3/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valerie Flores conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose launching the complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Cindy Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. Information received alleged staff did not prevent Resident #2 (R2) from inappropriately touching Resident #1 (R1). Interviews conducted with facility staff report that R1 had a history of making false allegations against other residents in care. Staff reported that on 10/25/2025, R1 alleged an unknown staff member enter into R1’s room and sexually assaulted R1. It was reported that Executive Director (ED) contacted the local police department, and an investigation was conducted pertaining to the incident. Interviews with staff and R1’s responsible person reported that R1 had a surveillance camera in R1’s room which was monitored by R1’s responsible person. (Continue to LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260223172841

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff not meeting resident toileting needs. Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Celia Saldivar and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 7/5/23 LPA Mixson conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed 4 residents and 5 staff, and requested pertaining documents. On 10/27/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested copies of physician’s report, service plan, admission agreement, medication list, notes, incident reports for resident #1(R1). On 10/29/25 LPA Flores conducted interviews over the phone with 5 staff. On 10/30/25 LPA conducted interviews with 3 residents over the phone. On 11/3/25 LPA Flores interviewed 3 additional residents and conducted a tour of the facility during another complaint investigation. On 11/4/25 LPA delivered findings for the above allegations. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230629115702
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident was bathed Staff did not provide adequate housekeeping services to resident Staff did not provide resident transportation to medical appointments
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Cindy Garcia and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/1/23 LPA Shaw Ross conducted an initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed 4 staff, 1 resident, and requested the pertaining documents. On 10/27/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested copies of physician’s report, service plan, admission agreement, notes, incident reports for resident #1(R1). On 10/29/25 LPA Flores conducted interviews over the phone with 5 staff. On 10/30/25 LPA Flores interviewed 3 residents over the phone. On 11/3/25 LPA Flores conducted a facility tour and observed 6 randomly chosen resident bedrooms, interviewed 3 additional residents and delivered findings for the above allegations. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident was bathed. It is allCDSS inspection report, November 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231128085956

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are overcharging resident in care. Staff do not provide resident with an itemized list of charges.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jacqueline Shaw Ross made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Celia Saldivar, Business Office Coordinator and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, interviews, and records review. On 08/02/2023, Community Care Licensing received an allegation that staff are overcharging resident in care and staff do not provide resident with an itemized list of charges. R1 and his wife (R2) share a unit at the facility together. It was alleged that R1 noticed what appeared to be a double charge on their bank statement of Personal Service charges for May 2023. Per interview with R1, stated they did not understand the charges and expressed that staff in the facility seemed unwilling to explain charges to him. LPA interviewed both R1 and R2, as well as reviewed their bank statement. Cont'd on LIC9099C.... UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230802133907
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to respond to call button in a timely manner.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On July 05, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct additional staff and resident interviews, and deliver findings to concluded the investigation. LPA Mixson met with the Administrator introduced herself and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA Mixson toured the facility and made observations pertaining to the listed allegation. Present currently at the facility were 45 staff and 62 residents. There were no deficiencies and/or civil penalties cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code or Regulations during this visit. The listed allegation was investigated, and based on staff and resident interviews, record reviews and observations, there was not a preponderance of the evidence strand to demonstrate the listed allegation did or did not occur. On 12/05/2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL), received information stating that the facility staff failed to respond to a residents' call button in a timely manner. InformatioCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 18-AS-20221205121619
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in resident becoming malnourished and dehydrated Staff failed to follow resident's plan of care Resident was deprived of oxygen Facility failed to provide sanitary conditions in resident's bedroom Facility does not have enough staff to meet resident's need
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tricia Danielson and Cheryl Goodrich arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Health and Wellness Director Hanofi Adogiawerie and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Staff neglect resulted in resident becoming malnourished and dehydrated" and "Facility failed to follow residents plan of care", it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) was not provided assistance with eating their meals, as agreed upon when admitted to the facility. A review of the admission agreement, R1 was admitted on 03/16/2021. It was further alleged that R1 was not woken up when meals were delivered to their room. Although it was alleged that R1 was dehydrated, it was also simultaneously reported by the Complainant that on several occasions, empty water bottles were found in R1’s room. A review of R1’s physician report dated 01/27/2021, revealed R1 was able to feed self. A review of R1’s PersonCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210607133843
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not notify resident's family of resident's fall(s). Staff did not report resident's fall(s) to the facility. Staff threatened resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation pertaining to the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was greeted and entry by Hanofi Edogiawerie Health and Wellness Director. LPA met with Executive Director Cindy Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit. The allegation(s) noted above were investigated. The investigation consisted of observations, interviews and record review. Regarding the allegation of facility did not notify resident's family of resident's fall(s). Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on September 21, 2015. R1 was noted to have a motor impairment as they have weakness and neuropathy. As a result, R1 used a wheelchair, walker and required a two-person assist. On October 11, 2021 R1 did sustain a fall where they reportedly rolled out of their bed, that was stated to not have been reported, by the previous administrator Queen Ayers. Queen was not aware of the incident until having tCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220223120053

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 696-5753
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Murrieta? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.