Renaissance Village Murrieta is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Murrieta, Riverside County, California — state license #331800083, licensed for 166 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated January 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Renaissance Village Murrieta

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 166 residents · Murrieta, CA · Riverside County
LicensedMemory careBedriddenWheelchair not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331800083, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
24271 Jackson Avenue · Murrieta, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 319-8243
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 14 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
BLDG A:112 NON-AMB OF WHICH 14 CAN BE BEDRIDDEN, NON-AMB ON 3RD FLOOR;BLDG C: 18 NON-AMB OF WHICH 10 CAN BE BEDRIDDEN; BLDG D 18 BEDRIDDEN, E; 18 BEDRIDDEN;BLDG C,D&E; DELAYED EGRESS AND LOCKED PERIMETER. 25 HOSPICE. NEW MGMT: WELLQUEST CA 2, LLC EFF: 10/8/25.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 2, 2026
Occupancy at the September 24, 2025 visit
116 of 166 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 15, 2023 to September 24, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not administering resident's medication as prescrible. Staff spoke to resident in an inappropriate manner.

On September 24, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with the Executive Director, Brian Taube, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant with the Executive Director Brian Taube (ED). LPA reviewed R1’s service records (Admission Agreement (dated 03/30/2018), Physician’s Report (dated 03/18/2018, to 11/15/2022), Resident assessment (dated 03/30/2018 to 11/15/2022). LPA obtained the facility's Medication Administration Records (dated 08/1/2025 to 09/23/2025).S LPA obtained copies of the residents' and staff rosters. Staff training records. LPA interviewed the Executive Director (ED), four (4) staff (S1-S4), and seven residents #2-8 (R2- R8). Unfortunately, LPA was unable to interview R1 due to R1 Passing in October 2024. Report continues, see LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220929110343
Feb 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to neglect, staff caused injuries to a resident while in care

Licensing Program Analyst, Yolanda Delgado arrived unannounced to the facility and met with Brian Taube in order to deliver the findings for the complaint allegation listed above. During the course of the investigation, staff interviews were conducted along with record reviews. On February 22, 2023, the Department received a complaint alleging neglect by staff caused injuries to a resident while in care. It was reported that Executive Director (ED), Brian Taube allowed Resident #1 (R1) to sit on their walker chair while the ED pushed R1. It was reported that while ED was pushing R1, to transport R1 from the doctor’s office to the vehicle, the walker hit a crack on the tiled floor. R1 then fell backwards off the walker. R1 complained of pain and the ED contacted 911. R1 was transported to the emergency room. (Continued on Page 2) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230222163013
Jan 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a proper rate increase notice to the resident or the residents' representative. Staff did not follow proper Pre-Admission Appraisal procedures.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jacqueline Shaw Ross conducted a visit to the facility and met with Juan Vergara, Business Office Manager. The purpose of the visit was to deliver findings for the above allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, clients, additional witnesses, and record review. On 10/31/2023, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging the facility did not provide a proper rate increase notice to resident and did not follow proper pre-admission appraisal procedures. It was reported that Resident #1 or responsible party did not receive documentation regarding the rate increase. Information obtained from an interview with Executive Directors and Resident/Representative indicate the Admissions Agreement was read and reviewed prior to their signing and Resident/Representative was aware that there would be rate increases; however, it did not indicate the dates the increases would occur. Information obtained from interviews with Executive Dithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2024 · control 18-AS-20231031153951
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff falsified resident records

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director's Brian Taube and Jeanne Orona and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and records review. On 09/24/20 community care licensing received a complaint alleging that the facility falsified resident records. Resident#1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 02/06/17. Upon admission R1 was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. On 09/07/20 R1 was sent at the emergency room due to swelling in their lower extremities. Per the emergency room report the patient history was provided by both the patient and facility staff. The patient history notes that patient history is limited due to dementia. LPA conducted a review of multiple Physician’s reports, Needs and Services plans and resident level of care assessmethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200924141733
Sep 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting the needs of residents Residents rooms are not being cleaned Residents are not being offered activities

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to continue an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Brian Taube and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation "Staff are not meeting the needs of the residents", it was alleged that in August 2020, residents were not being assisted with hygiene and grooming. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents interviewed and whom resided at the facility during the period in question, reported they received all the assistance they needed with personal hygiene, grooming, bathing, and toileting. Two (2) of two (2) staff interviewed and whom were reported to have direct knowledge concerning the allegation, reported they did not receive nor did they hear of complaints from residents about not receiving assistance with hygiene and grooming during the period in question. Regarding the allegation "Resident rooms are not being cleaned", it was alleged that in Auguthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200811150418
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file12typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253312024220202344020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 319-8243

Is Renaissance Village Murrieta licensed?

Yes — Renaissance Village Murrieta is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Murrieta (Riverside County): California license #331800083, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 166 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Renaissance Village Murrieta care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Renaissance Village Murrieta with clearances for dementia / memory care and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordBLDG A:112 NON-AMB OF WHICH 14 CAN BE BEDRIDDEN, NON-AMB ON 3RD FLOOR;BLDG C: 18 NON-AMB OF WHICH 10 CAN BE BEDRIDDEN; BLDG D 18 BEDRIDDEN, E; 18 BEDRIDDEN;BLDG C,D&E; DELAYED EGRESS AND LOCKED PERIMETER. 25 HOSPICE. NEW MGMT: WELLQUEST CA 2, LLC EFF: 10/8/25.

How much does Renaissance Village Murrieta cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Renaissance Village Murrieta's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Renaissance Village Murrieta accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Renaissance Village Murrieta is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

116 of 166 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on September 24, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Renaissance Village Murrieta?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2021 for Renaissance Village Murrieta; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 24, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not administering resident's medication as prescrible. Staff spoke to resident in an inappropriate manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On September 24, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with the Executive Director, Brian Taube, and the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the physical plant with the Executive Director Brian Taube (ED). LPA reviewed R1’s service records (Admission Agreement (dated 03/30/2018), Physician’s Report (dated 03/18/2018, to 11/15/2022), Resident assessment (dated 03/30/2018 to 11/15/2022). LPA obtained the facility's Medication Administration Records (dated 08/1/2025 to 09/23/2025).S LPA obtained copies of the residents' and staff rosters. Staff training records. LPA interviewed the Executive Director (ED), four (4) staff (S1-S4), and seven residents #2-8 (R2- R8). Unfortunately, LPA was unable to interview R1 due to R1 Passing in October 2024. Report continues, see LIC9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220929110343
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect, staff caused injuries to a resident while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst, Yolanda Delgado arrived unannounced to the facility and met with Brian Taube in order to deliver the findings for the complaint allegation listed above. During the course of the investigation, staff interviews were conducted along with record reviews. On February 22, 2023, the Department received a complaint alleging neglect by staff caused injuries to a resident while in care. It was reported that Executive Director (ED), Brian Taube allowed Resident #1 (R1) to sit on their walker chair while the ED pushed R1. It was reported that while ED was pushing R1, to transport R1 from the doctor’s office to the vehicle, the walker hit a crack on the tiled floor. R1 then fell backwards off the walker. R1 complained of pain and the ED contacted 911. R1 was transported to the emergency room. (Continued on Page 2) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 5, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230222163013

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide a proper rate increase notice to the resident or the residents' representative. Staff did not follow proper Pre-Admission Appraisal procedures.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jacqueline Shaw Ross conducted a visit to the facility and met with Juan Vergara, Business Office Manager. The purpose of the visit was to deliver findings for the above allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, clients, additional witnesses, and record review. On 10/31/2023, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging the facility did not provide a proper rate increase notice to resident and did not follow proper pre-admission appraisal procedures. It was reported that Resident #1 or responsible party did not receive documentation regarding the rate increase. Information obtained from an interview with Executive Directors and Resident/Representative indicate the Admissions Agreement was read and reviewed prior to their signing and Resident/Representative was aware that there would be rate increases; however, it did not indicate the dates the increases would occur. Information obtained from interviews with Executive DiCDSS inspection report, June 24, 2024 · control 18-AS-20231031153951

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff falsified resident records
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director's Brian Taube and Jeanne Orona and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and records review. On 09/24/20 community care licensing received a complaint alleging that the facility falsified resident records. Resident#1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 02/06/17. Upon admission R1 was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. On 09/07/20 R1 was sent at the emergency room due to swelling in their lower extremities. Per the emergency room report the patient history was provided by both the patient and facility staff. The patient history notes that patient history is limited due to dementia. LPA conducted a review of multiple Physician’s reports, Needs and Services plans and resident level of care assessmeCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200924141733
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not meeting the needs of residents Residents rooms are not being cleaned Residents are not being offered activities
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to continue an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Brian Taube and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation "Staff are not meeting the needs of the residents", it was alleged that in August 2020, residents were not being assisted with hygiene and grooming. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents interviewed and whom resided at the facility during the period in question, reported they received all the assistance they needed with personal hygiene, grooming, bathing, and toileting. Two (2) of two (2) staff interviewed and whom were reported to have direct knowledge concerning the allegation, reported they did not receive nor did they hear of complaints from residents about not receiving assistance with hygiene and grooming during the period in question. Regarding the allegation "Resident rooms are not being cleaned", it was alleged that in AuguCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200811150418

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 319-8243
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Renaissance Village Murrieta? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.