Atienza Residential Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Beaumont, Riverside County, California — state license #331880723, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 36 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Atienza Residential Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Beaumont, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331880723, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1328 Galaxy Dr · Beaumont, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 845-3565
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. BEDROOMS 1,2,3 ARE FOR AMBULATORY ONLY. BEDROOM4 MAY BE USED FOR NON-AMBULATORYState service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 43 times and filed 36 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 21, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 28, 2026
Occupancy at the April 23, 2025 visit
2 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 13 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 19, 2022 to September 19, 2025. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 13 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 26 of 36 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 10 documents
Oct 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hits resident in care Staff are blocking exiting doors for residents to have access to common areas

On 9/19/2025, at approximately 9:10 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lavette Farlow, and Edith Conchas conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation and deliver the findings. LPAs were greeted and granted entrance at the door by Staff, Danica Reyes, Caregiver. LPAs identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPAs also presented themselves to Licensee, Caroline Armstrong, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPAs conducted interviews with staff and residents, reviewed documents and did a walk-through of the facility. Allegation 1: Staff hits resident in care. LPA Farlow interviewed five (5) staff and four (4) residents. Interview with Residents R1, and R5 revealed that S2 hits residents in care. LPA Farlow interview with staff S1 and S3 revealed that S2 does hit and hug people. S1 stated they have not seen it but was aware of R1 stating it happened. S3 stated S2 does hit people but is not sure if it playful, but the behavithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250603100246
Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff leave residents in soiled clothing for an extended period of time

On 4/23/2025 at 12:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation. LPA Serrano was greeted and granted entrance by caregiver Irene Huliselan. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with administrator Caroline Armstrong. LPA Serrano conducted a quick tour of the facility and interviewed the administrator. Regarding allegation "Facility staff leave residents in soiled clothing for an extended period of time." LPA Serrano interviewed the administrator over the phone to investigate the allegation and LPA learned that the alleged victim does not live in this facility but used to live at the other Atienza facility in Redlands. Previous complaints received 4/2/2025 verified that this facility was vacant and no residents here on the date of the allegation. ****continue on LIC9099C**** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250422082147
Apr 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not allow ombudsman representative access to the facility Staff did not ensure facility phone was answered

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA Mann met with Caroline Armstrong, Administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, pertinent document reviews, and interviews with staff. The allegations that staff did not allow ombudsman representative access to the facility and that staff did not ensure facility phone was answered. Caroline, Administrator stated that there was no one at the facility to open the door. There are currently no residents at the facility. The phone number listed on the facility profile is not the correct number. LPA Mann toured the facility with the Administrator Caroline, based on LPA observations there are currently no residents at the facility. LPA informed Administrator that CCL will conduct an in-office meeting at the Regional Office for previous deficiencies. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250402104413
20248 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff accepted Power of Attorney over resident Staff are making medical decisions on behalf of a resident in care. Staff altered a resident's document.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Administrator Caroline Armstrong and explained the elements of the complaint.Allegation #1: LPA Prieto obtained documentation that reveals staff member #1 (S1), associated with this facility, became resident #1's (R1) Power of Attorney (POA). An interview with Administrator Armstrong confirmed that S1 did indeed become POA for R1.Allegation #2: LPA Prieto obtained documentation showing that S1 altered R1's POA to include additional services and/or treatments. Administrator Armstrong confirmed in an interview that S1 is making medical decisions for R1.Allegation #3: Documentation (POA) for R1 was obtained, revealing that it was altered to include additional services and/or treatments. An interview with Administrator Armstrong confirmed these alterations.During the time of LPA's visit, there was one other resident in care (R2), whthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241218154749
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Excluded staff present in the facility

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Bernadette Allen and Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver the findings on the allegation above. LPAs met with Danica Reyes caregiver who was explained the purpose of the visit and allegation. LPAs arrived at the facility approximately at 1:50 PM, LPAs toured the facility and observed Staff 1(S1) who has been excluded from the facility leaving out of the garage side door. The Interviews with residents, staff members, and the reporting party corroborated that S1 has been present at the facility since the exclusion order was issued on 06/03/2024. LPA informed Danica Reyes- caregiver that the licensee will be called in for a non-compliance meeting at the San Bernardino Regional Office. The caregiver and licensee has been informed that S1 needs to be disassociated from all facilities licensed by Department of Social Services. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240924151149
Oct 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect. Staff forcefully pulled on resident's body.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrives to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Caroline Armstrong, Administrator, and allowed entry. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews and observations. Regarding the allegation that staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect; LPA Prieto obtained video footage of the staff #1 (S1) retrieving resident #1 (R1) for a location outside the facility making statements to him that did not accord dignity in their personal relationships with staff and resident. ***continued on LIC 9099C*** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240319125953
20233 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate care & supervision to prevent resident from wandering away from the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA Allen met with Adam Brone staff member who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. During the interview Adam Brone stated resident 1(R1) did wonder out of the facility on 8/22/2023. He stated that he checked on R1 at 12PM, and when he returned at 12:15 PM he discovered R1 was no longer in the facility. He stated he toured the neighborhood to locate R1 and was unsuccessful. Adam stated he returned and called 911 to file a missing person’s report and after identifying himself and providing proof that he was a caregiver at the facility he was informed by the police where R1 could be located. R1 and Adam was picked up by the administrator Caroline Armstrong at San Gorgonio Hospital the same day 8/22/2023. LPA observed R1's facility file and it states R1 is a wanderer and after conducting the interviews with the 2 staff membersthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230824170032
Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are met Staff do not ensure that resident's grooming needs are met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA Allen met with Adam Brone staff member who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. LPA Allen investigation consisted of two (2) staff interviews, one (1) attempted interview with R1 and review of R1's facility file. LPA observed resident 1 (R1) in their room alone. The resident’s hygiene and grooming needs appeared to be met at the time of visit, R1 cloths, bedding and bedroom was observed to be clean free of any obstruction of walkways, free of odors and stains of any kind on the person and bedding. There were no health and safety concerns at this time. LPA attempted to interview R1 who could not confirm or deny allegations. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230824170032
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations11typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints16typical 0
Total complaints13typical 0
State visits on file43typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020258101202481132023810220224512021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,000$5,000 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 845-3565

Is Atienza Residential Care licensed?

Yes — Atienza Residential Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Beaumont (Riverside County): California license #331880723, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 36 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 21, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Atienza Residential Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Atienza Residential Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care; it does not list hospice care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. BEDROOMS 1,2,3 ARE FOR AMBULATORY ONLY. BEDROOM4 MAY BE USED FOR NON-AMBULATORY

How much does Atienza Residential Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Atienza Residential Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Atienza Residential Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Atienza Residential Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

2 of 6 beds occupied (33%) when the state visited on April 23, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Atienza Residential Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 43 state visits and 36 dated documents since 2021 for Atienza Residential Care; 13 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 19, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

13 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hits resident in care Staff are blocking exiting doors for residents to have access to common areas
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 9/19/2025, at approximately 9:10 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lavette Farlow, and Edith Conchas conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation and deliver the findings. LPAs were greeted and granted entrance at the door by Staff, Danica Reyes, Caregiver. LPAs identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPAs also presented themselves to Licensee, Caroline Armstrong, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPAs conducted interviews with staff and residents, reviewed documents and did a walk-through of the facility. Allegation 1: Staff hits resident in care. LPA Farlow interviewed five (5) staff and four (4) residents. Interview with Residents R1, and R5 revealed that S2 hits residents in care. LPA Farlow interview with staff S1 and S3 revealed that S2 does hit and hug people. S1 stated they have not seen it but was aware of R1 stating it happened. S3 stated S2 does hit people but is not sure if it playful, but the behaviCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250603100246
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff leave residents in soiled clothing for an extended period of time
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 4/23/2025 at 12:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation. LPA Serrano was greeted and granted entrance by caregiver Irene Huliselan. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with administrator Caroline Armstrong. LPA Serrano conducted a quick tour of the facility and interviewed the administrator. Regarding allegation "Facility staff leave residents in soiled clothing for an extended period of time." LPA Serrano interviewed the administrator over the phone to investigate the allegation and LPA learned that the alleged victim does not live in this facility but used to live at the other Atienza facility in Redlands. Previous complaints received 4/2/2025 verified that this facility was vacant and no residents here on the date of the allegation. ****continue on LIC9099C**** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 23, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250422082147
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not allow ombudsman representative access to the facility Staff did not ensure facility phone was answered
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA Mann met with Caroline Armstrong, Administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, pertinent document reviews, and interviews with staff. The allegations that staff did not allow ombudsman representative access to the facility and that staff did not ensure facility phone was answered. Caroline, Administrator stated that there was no one at the facility to open the door. There are currently no residents at the facility. The phone number listed on the facility profile is not the correct number. LPA Mann toured the facility with the Administrator Caroline, based on LPA observations there are currently no residents at the facility. LPA informed Administrator that CCL will conduct an in-office meeting at the Regional Office for previous deficiencies. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 8, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250402104413

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff accepted Power of Attorney over resident Staff are making medical decisions on behalf of a resident in care. Staff altered a resident's document.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Administrator Caroline Armstrong and explained the elements of the complaint.Allegation #1: LPA Prieto obtained documentation that reveals staff member #1 (S1), associated with this facility, became resident #1's (R1) Power of Attorney (POA). An interview with Administrator Armstrong confirmed that S1 did indeed become POA for R1.Allegation #2: LPA Prieto obtained documentation showing that S1 altered R1's POA to include additional services and/or treatments. Administrator Armstrong confirmed in an interview that S1 is making medical decisions for R1.Allegation #3: Documentation (POA) for R1 was obtained, revealing that it was altered to include additional services and/or treatments. An interview with Administrator Armstrong confirmed these alterations.During the time of LPA's visit, there was one other resident in care (R2), whCDSS inspection report, December 23, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241218154749
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedExcluded staff present in the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Bernadette Allen and Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver the findings on the allegation above. LPAs met with Danica Reyes caregiver who was explained the purpose of the visit and allegation. LPAs arrived at the facility approximately at 1:50 PM, LPAs toured the facility and observed Staff 1(S1) who has been excluded from the facility leaving out of the garage side door. The Interviews with residents, staff members, and the reporting party corroborated that S1 has been present at the facility since the exclusion order was issued on 06/03/2024. LPA informed Danica Reyes- caregiver that the licensee will be called in for a non-compliance meeting at the San Bernardino Regional Office. The caregiver and licensee has been informed that S1 needs to be disassociated from all facilities licensed by Department of Social Services. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240924151149
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity and respect. Staff forcefully pulled on resident's body.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrives to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Caroline Armstrong, Administrator, and allowed entry. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews and observations. Regarding the allegation that staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect; LPA Prieto obtained video footage of the staff #1 (S1) retrieving resident #1 (R1) for a location outside the facility making statements to him that did not accord dignity in their personal relationships with staff and resident. ***continued on LIC 9099C*** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240319125953

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate care & supervision to prevent resident from wandering away from the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA Allen met with Adam Brone staff member who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. During the interview Adam Brone stated resident 1(R1) did wonder out of the facility on 8/22/2023. He stated that he checked on R1 at 12PM, and when he returned at 12:15 PM he discovered R1 was no longer in the facility. He stated he toured the neighborhood to locate R1 and was unsuccessful. Adam stated he returned and called 911 to file a missing person’s report and after identifying himself and providing proof that he was a caregiver at the facility he was informed by the police where R1 could be located. R1 and Adam was picked up by the administrator Caroline Armstrong at San Gorgonio Hospital the same day 8/22/2023. LPA observed R1's facility file and it states R1 is a wanderer and after conducting the interviews with the 2 staff membersCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230824170032
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are met Staff do not ensure that resident's grooming needs are met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for the mentioned allegations. LPA Allen met with Adam Brone staff member who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allegations. LPA Allen investigation consisted of two (2) staff interviews, one (1) attempted interview with R1 and review of R1's facility file. LPA observed resident 1 (R1) in their room alone. The resident’s hygiene and grooming needs appeared to be met at the time of visit, R1 cloths, bedding and bedroom was observed to be clean free of any obstruction of walkways, free of odors and stains of any kind on the person and bedding. There were no health and safety concerns at this time. LPA attempted to interview R1 who could not confirm or deny allegations. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230824170032
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not operating per fire clearance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Bernadette Allen and Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the above allegation. LPAs met with Adam Barone- Support Staff and explained the purpose of the visit. The allegation: Facility is not operating per fire clearance. On 3/28/2023 LPA Allen arrived and met with Adam Barone and together we toured the facility. The tour included residents’ bedrooms to verify if the rooms are following the egress requirements for non-ambulatory residents. LPA observed that the rooms did not meet the egress requirements for non-ambulatory residents, and the door separating rooms 1 and 2 from the remainder of the living space should be permitted by the City of Beaumont Department of Building and Safety. Resident room 3 shall have a direct exit to the exterior in order to house non-ambulatory residents and the fire extinguishers shall be serviced annually. Based on LPAs observation, interviews conducted and records review, the preponderCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20221012161059
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yell at resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Corazon Capalad and she was informed of the purpose of the visit and the above allegation. LPA Allen attempted to interview R1 at the time of the visit but was unsuccessful. Based on the interviews and file review the above finding is Unsubstantiated. A finding of unsubstantiated means although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Corazon Capalad at the conclusion of the visit with appeal rights. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200625081458
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining pressure injury
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
****The is an amended document originally delivered on 2/9/2023**** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Caroline Armstrong and she was informed of the purpose of the visit regarding the above allegation. The investigation consisted of medical record review and Resident 1 (R1) file review. The records show that (R1) was receiving continuous care for a pressure wound and the resident was also moved every two hours. Records also indicated that staff informed the licensee of any change in condition of the wound and documentation was made to make sure that the wound would not worsen. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is found to be Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200625081458

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 43 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
11
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
16
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
43
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Atienza Residential Care?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Armstrong, Caroline, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 845-3565
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Atienza Residential Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.