Oakwood Village, Inc. is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Auburn, Placer County, California — state license #317000237, licensed for 124 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Oakwood Village, Inc.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 124 residents · Auburn, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #317000237, held since 1995 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3388 Bell Road · Auburn, Placer County
Phone
(530) 889-8122
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 124 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15) CLIENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 17, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 17, 2026
Occupancy at the June 19, 2025 visit
60 of 124 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 15 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 29, 2021 to June 19, 2025. 15 of the 15 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (10), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 15 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 15 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 18 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly addressing pest infestation in the facility Staff are not practicing proper hand washing procedures Staff do not ensure kitchen appliances are in proper working order Staff are not meeting residents dietary needs Facility kitchen is in disrepair

LPA Tryon visited the facility on 6/19/2025 to continue work on the complaint. LPA met with ED Patty Uclaray. LPA toured the assisted living dining room and memory care dining room, viewed the noon meal, watched servers working, observed residents eating and spoke briefly with several residents, LPA also interviewed 3 kitchen staff. Over the course of visits. LPA has toured the dining areas, kitchen, dishwashing area, food storage, cooler/freezer, separate Ice cream freezer, staff dining area, outside hose area where rubber mats are washed down, spoken with ED, Director of Dining Services, 3 kitchen staff, and resdidents, reviewed documents. Regarding the allegation that staff are not properly addressing pest infestation, LPA spoke with ED, Dining Director and 3 kitchen staff. No one has witnessed bugs, rodents or pests in kitchen/food storage or dining areas. LPA toured these areas and did not see any pests, no "droppings" or other evidence of pests. The facility contracts with a pestthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250604145853
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow residents care plan Staff did not ensure the bed/chair alarms were in working order Staff did not ensure residents personal hygine needs were met

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Patty Uclaray to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ***Report continued on 9099-C*** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250207144045
20245 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident in care had access to centrally stored medications

On 12/12/2024 LPA Tryon visited the facility to complete the complaint. On this date LPA met and spoke with resident involved. LPA has spoken with resident, Executive Director and staff. LPA learned that recently Resident R1 was discovered to have a bottle of Tylenol in room. LPA learned that R1 had purchased the medication, not being aware that any medications must be centrally logged, stored and locked in the medication room by staff, and that a doctor prescription is needed. When R1 became aware of this, the medication was given to staff, stored and locked, and a precription was obtained for the medication from the physician. Staff are now handling the medication and R1 receives it as needed. Since the facility was not previously made aware of the medication being present; it was turned over immediately, staff cannot violate resident rights by randomly searching through resident apartment or belongings without resident permission; and staff had no reason to suspect anything was therthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241206144513
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained fracture while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst Todd Tryon visited the facility unannounced on 12/3/24 to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. The Department concluded that on June 1, 2024, at approximately 9:30 PM, Med-Tech S2 completed their shift after ensuring R1’s bed alarm was activated, a standard procedure given R1’s fall risk. At 11:30 PM, S1 discovered R1 on the floor during a routine room check but did not recall hearing the bed alarm. S1, who lacks medical training, assisted R1 to bed without informing any Med-Tech, administrative personnel, or family, as required by facility policy. According to the administrator, any unwitnessed fall must result in an immediate call to AMR, and notifications to Med-Tech staff, administration, and family members. R1’s family had, in coordination with the facility, implemented a care plan involving a bed alarm to prevent falls. However, on June 1, 2024, this bed alarm was apparently not working or was not turned on, potentiallythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240605153211
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure sufficient activities are planned for memory care residents Staff does not ensure adequate quantity and quality of food is provided to memory care residents

On 12/3/2024 LPA Tryon visited the facility to complete the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Patty Uclaray. During the course of the complaint LPA has Toured the facility including Memory Care unit, main dining room and kitchen, Memory Care dining room, snack areas in both Assisted Living and Memory Care, spoke with Admiistrator, Culinary Director, interviewed 5 staff and 2 residents from the memory care unit, observed an activity in Memory Care which included an art activity and snacks with 10 residents; observed activity in the assisted living side. Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure sufficient activities are planned for memory care residents, LPA has observed activities, spoken with Administrator, Activity Director, 5 staff and 2 residents. and reviewed printed activity schedules. LPA found ongoing mulitple activities are scheduled. Staff and residents state that activities are offered. They also state that some residents choose to not participate, or may partithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241002115441
Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not assisting residents with hygiene needs

LPA Hiratsuka conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA Hiratsuka interviewed staff and reviewed resident records. This allegation was focused on residents who are not receiving showers as per their assigned schedule. Interviews with staff showed some staff have no issues giving showers to residents and some do. The staff have noted the residents who may be difficult to bathe are identified. Executive Director (ED) Patty Uclcray and Resident Care Director Jay James (RCD), both stated they are implementing new training techniques for the staff to have more consistency to be able to talk residents into taking showers instead of refusing. Shower logs show the residents who require assistance with showering sometimes refuse and sometimes accept but the residents do get showered. LPA unable to interview residents in question due to mental capacity Based on the above, LPA cannot prove or disprove because each side has their own version of events. Due to the information gathethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240710112435
Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not checking on residents leaving residents in soiled briefs for many hours

LPA Hiratsuka conducted the investigation into the allegation above, LPA Hiratsuka interviewed staff and reviewed resident records. Interviews stated some residents have been left in soiled briefs for an undermined amount of time and some interviews stated residents have not. Some interviews state residents cannot be put on set schedules of when they need to urinate or defecate because residents do not have control of when they need to do those bodily functions. Residents who have heavier incontinence have been noted in their charts and are supposed to be checked more frequently. Some staff stated the residents are and some stated the residents are not. Some staff stated the residents are supposed to be changed prior to shift change and are not being changed. LPA unable to interview residents in question due to mental capacity. Based on the above, LPA cannot prove or disprove because each side has their own version of events. Due to the information gathered, LPA cannot determine the althe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240722102908
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not keep the facility free from infestation Staff altered a report involving a resident Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver compliant findings. LPA met with Patty Uclaray during today’s inspection. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not keep the facility free from infestation”. LPA interviewed residents and staff and obtained facility documentation. Administrator stated there is construction occurring close by and so they have seen an increase in pests at the facility. Administrator stated they have a pest control company that comes to the facility several times a month to take care of any pest issues. LPA interviewed 4 residents in care in which they stated they do not see a pest issue at the facility. Continuation on 9099-C. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240729103359
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file31typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1995.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020257802024571202345020224402021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (530) 889-8122

Is Oakwood Village, Inc. licensed?

Yes — Oakwood Village, Inc. is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Auburn (Placer County): California license #317000237, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 124 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 17, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakwood Village, Inc. care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakwood Village, Inc. with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15) CLIENTS.

How much does Oakwood Village, Inc. cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakwood Village, Inc.'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakwood Village, Inc. accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakwood Village, Inc. is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

60 of 124 beds occupied (48%) when the state visited on June 19, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakwood Village, Inc.?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2021 for Oakwood Village, Inc.; 15 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 19, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

15 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly addressing pest infestation in the facility Staff are not practicing proper hand washing procedures Staff do not ensure kitchen appliances are in proper working order Staff are not meeting residents dietary needs Facility kitchen is in disrepair
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Tryon visited the facility on 6/19/2025 to continue work on the complaint. LPA met with ED Patty Uclaray. LPA toured the assisted living dining room and memory care dining room, viewed the noon meal, watched servers working, observed residents eating and spoke briefly with several residents, LPA also interviewed 3 kitchen staff. Over the course of visits. LPA has toured the dining areas, kitchen, dishwashing area, food storage, cooler/freezer, separate Ice cream freezer, staff dining area, outside hose area where rubber mats are washed down, spoken with ED, Director of Dining Services, 3 kitchen staff, and resdidents, reviewed documents. Regarding the allegation that staff are not properly addressing pest infestation, LPA spoke with ED, Dining Director and 3 kitchen staff. No one has witnessed bugs, rodents or pests in kitchen/food storage or dining areas. LPA toured these areas and did not see any pests, no "droppings" or other evidence of pests. The facility contracts with a pestCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250604145853
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow residents care plan Staff did not ensure the bed/chair alarms were in working order Staff did not ensure residents personal hygine needs were met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Patty Uclaray to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ***Report continued on 9099-C*** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250207144045

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident in care had access to centrally stored medications
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 12/12/2024 LPA Tryon visited the facility to complete the complaint. On this date LPA met and spoke with resident involved. LPA has spoken with resident, Executive Director and staff. LPA learned that recently Resident R1 was discovered to have a bottle of Tylenol in room. LPA learned that R1 had purchased the medication, not being aware that any medications must be centrally logged, stored and locked in the medication room by staff, and that a doctor prescription is needed. When R1 became aware of this, the medication was given to staff, stored and locked, and a precription was obtained for the medication from the physician. Staff are now handling the medication and R1 receives it as needed. Since the facility was not previously made aware of the medication being present; it was turned over immediately, staff cannot violate resident rights by randomly searching through resident apartment or belongings without resident permission; and staff had no reason to suspect anything was therCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241206144513
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained fracture while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Todd Tryon visited the facility unannounced on 12/3/24 to deliver the findings of the investigation completed by the Department. The Department concluded that on June 1, 2024, at approximately 9:30 PM, Med-Tech S2 completed their shift after ensuring R1’s bed alarm was activated, a standard procedure given R1’s fall risk. At 11:30 PM, S1 discovered R1 on the floor during a routine room check but did not recall hearing the bed alarm. S1, who lacks medical training, assisted R1 to bed without informing any Med-Tech, administrative personnel, or family, as required by facility policy. According to the administrator, any unwitnessed fall must result in an immediate call to AMR, and notifications to Med-Tech staff, administration, and family members. R1’s family had, in coordination with the facility, implemented a care plan involving a bed alarm to prevent falls. However, on June 1, 2024, this bed alarm was apparently not working or was not turned on, potentiallyCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240605153211
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure sufficient activities are planned for memory care residents Staff does not ensure adequate quantity and quality of food is provided to memory care residents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 12/3/2024 LPA Tryon visited the facility to complete the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Patty Uclaray. During the course of the complaint LPA has Toured the facility including Memory Care unit, main dining room and kitchen, Memory Care dining room, snack areas in both Assisted Living and Memory Care, spoke with Admiistrator, Culinary Director, interviewed 5 staff and 2 residents from the memory care unit, observed an activity in Memory Care which included an art activity and snacks with 10 residents; observed activity in the assisted living side. Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure sufficient activities are planned for memory care residents, LPA has observed activities, spoken with Administrator, Activity Director, 5 staff and 2 residents. and reviewed printed activity schedules. LPA found ongoing mulitple activities are scheduled. Staff and residents state that activities are offered. They also state that some residents choose to not participate, or may partiCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241002115441
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting residents with hygiene needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Hiratsuka conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA Hiratsuka interviewed staff and reviewed resident records. This allegation was focused on residents who are not receiving showers as per their assigned schedule. Interviews with staff showed some staff have no issues giving showers to residents and some do. The staff have noted the residents who may be difficult to bathe are identified. Executive Director (ED) Patty Uclcray and Resident Care Director Jay James (RCD), both stated they are implementing new training techniques for the staff to have more consistency to be able to talk residents into taking showers instead of refusing. Shower logs show the residents who require assistance with showering sometimes refuse and sometimes accept but the residents do get showered. LPA unable to interview residents in question due to mental capacity Based on the above, LPA cannot prove or disprove because each side has their own version of events. Due to the information gatheCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240710112435
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not checking on residents leaving residents in soiled briefs for many hours
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Hiratsuka conducted the investigation into the allegation above, LPA Hiratsuka interviewed staff and reviewed resident records. Interviews stated some residents have been left in soiled briefs for an undermined amount of time and some interviews stated residents have not. Some interviews state residents cannot be put on set schedules of when they need to urinate or defecate because residents do not have control of when they need to do those bodily functions. Residents who have heavier incontinence have been noted in their charts and are supposed to be checked more frequently. Some staff stated the residents are and some stated the residents are not. Some staff stated the residents are supposed to be changed prior to shift change and are not being changed. LPA unable to interview residents in question due to mental capacity. Based on the above, LPA cannot prove or disprove because each side has their own version of events. Due to the information gathered, LPA cannot determine the alCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240722102908
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not keep the facility free from infestation Staff altered a report involving a resident Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver compliant findings. LPA met with Patty Uclaray during today’s inspection. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not keep the facility free from infestation”. LPA interviewed residents and staff and obtained facility documentation. Administrator stated there is construction occurring close by and so they have seen an increase in pests at the facility. Administrator stated they have a pest control company that comes to the facility several times a month to take care of any pest issues. LPA interviewed 4 residents in care in which they stated they do not see a pest issue at the facility. Continuation on 9099-C. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240729103359

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is mismanaging resident's medications. Staff does not ensure resident is fed.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA has met with and spoken with Directors, staff, reviewed documentation, toured the facility on at least 2 occasions. No specific examples were given regarding when medications may have been given incorrectly, other than “in the morning.” LPA has reviewed medication records and interviewed staff. Complaint details stated it was thought that staff may have given R1 a particular medication (Seroquel) in the morning causing issues. (The medication was prescribed for bedtime.) However, LPA finds no evidence that there were medication errors made or medications given at incorrect times in the care of resident R1. In addition, Oakwood Village uses a computerized medication system that only allows medications to be given at certain times, etc. LPA finds there is no basis for this allegation. Allegation is Unfounded. LPA has reviewed documentation including initial and updated assessments and spoken with staff. LPA learned that R1 liked to stay in bed in the morning and did not always want tCDSS inspection report, May 25, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221122102314
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide adequate food service. Facility is unsanitary. Residents are not receiving adequate care and supervision. Staff being sexually inappropriate towards residents.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Tryon visited the facility on 5/25/2023 to complete the complaint. LPA met with Cathy Dustin and Mary Roberts. LPA has spoken with staff and witnesses, toured the facility on at least 2 occasions including dining room, kitchen, resident rooms, hallways, bathrooms, common areas and reviewed documentation. Regarding the allegation that staff failed to provide adequate food service, LPA has viewed meals on at least 2 occasions (plus muliple other times while at the facility in the past), visited the kitchen, reviewed menus. The food has always appeared to look appetizing and nutritious, sanitation in the kitchen appeared appropriate, clients spoken with briefly said food was good, and portions appeared plentiful. Food supplies in facility were adequate. At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that staff have failed to provide adequate food service. Allegation is UNFOUNDED. Regarding the allegation that the facility is unsanitary, LPA has toured the facility on several occasionsCDSS inspection report, May 25, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221021111633
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not administering residents medication in a timely manner. Facility staff did not assist residents in a timely manner. Facility staff not keeping facility free of pests.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 1/19/2022 LPA Tryon visited the facility to open the complaint. LPA met with ED John O'Brien. LPA reviewed documentation and spoke with staff. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are not administering medication in a timely manner, LPA reviewed MARS and chart notes. LPA found that one of the residents mentioned did miss a medication on 1/26/22 as allegated; but notes state that resident was out with family and that is why medication was missed. Others show medications as taken, so there is no way to prove any differently at this time. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding facility not assisting resident in a timely manner, the administration was not even aware of the mentioned resident having fallen; and there have been no injuries reported. Also, the time of response was given as 20 minutes as per resident, but there was no other proof of this. As well, response time was not necessarily unreasonable, and staff did in fact respond, to find resident had assisted self and was upCDSS inspection report, January 19, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230110120506

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
31
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(530) 889-8122
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakwood Village, Inc.? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.