Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lincoln, Placer County, California — state license #312700042, licensed for 132 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 33 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 132 residents · Lincoln, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #312700042, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
567 3rd Street · Lincoln, Placer County
Phone
(916) 409-4150
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 132 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 132 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED IN UNITS 111, 113-131. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 41 times and filed 33 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the March 6, 2025 visit
61 of 132 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 20 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 9, 2022 to March 6, 2025. 20 of the 20 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 20 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 20 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 33 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are falsifying resident’s medication administration record Staff do not ensure that resident's medication is administered as prescribed.

On March 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Director, Megan Gallagher to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA was accompanied by an observer from CCLD’s policy division. The department reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. It was reported that on October 19, 2024 R1 did not receive as needed pain medications as prescribed and requested. Physician’s orders for R1’s pain medication states as needed every 4 hours for pain. Statements alleged that at approximately 4:30 PM, On October 19, 2024, R1 requested pain medication. Med tech, S1, sought clarity of timing between R1’s medications before dispensing. Later in the evening, R1 again requested pain medication from S1. R1 alleged that medication was not dispensed at S1 left for water and did not return. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241030160128
Mar 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's pendant calls are answered in a timely manner. Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met.

On March 6, 2025,, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met withDirector, MeganGallagher. LPA was accompanied by an observer from CCLD’s policy division. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Regarding-Staff do not ensure that resident's pendant calls are answered in a timely manner. Records reviews, call records and staff interaction records did not support the allegation. Regarding- Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met. R1 records show R1 independently toilets and requires intermittent assistance. Supporting evidence was not found to support that R1's toileting needs are not met As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened orthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241031111456
Feb 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner. Facility has insufficient staff to provide care to residents. Staff not meeting resident’s dietary needs.

On February 12, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Administrator. The department conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy for the following allegations: Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner- The two incident for R1 that were mentioned on the complaint found that there was not sufficent evidence that the allegation could be substantiated. The incidents in July and August of 2024 where R1 experienced changes in their condition were documented and staff interviewed to show that staff responded as directed by R1's physician and according to R1's plan of care. Following each incident of a previously unidentified care need, R1's physician was contacted and the plan of care was updated as needed. Facility has insufficient staff to provide care to residenthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240904164258
20246 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to seek medical attention for a UTI and dehydration.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Graham Gunby and Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived unannounced on 12/18/2024 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 1/17/2024. LPAs met with Executive Director, Megan Gallagher and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240117154538
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident wandered away from the facility due to lack of care and supervision Staff billed resident for services not rendered

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday September 26, 2024, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 7/25/2024. LPA met with Administrator Megan and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed R1’s physicians report, incident report, police report, resident assessment, monthly billing, email communication, and nursing notes. The result of the investigation is as follows: Allegation: Resident wandered away from the facility due to lack of care and supervision. At approximately 9pm on July 8, 2024, LPA learned that the delayed egress alarm on a second-floor door went off. Staff checked the alarm but did not check the hallway nor did they check to ensure all residents were accounted for. When the morning shift began on July 9, 2024, they noticed that R1 was not in the facility. Per the police report, the facility called in a missing person’the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240725172932
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff is providing care and supervision to diabetic residents Unqualified staff is administering medication Staff mishandled the residents medical records Staff did not meet the residents medical needs while in care Staff mishandled the residents medications Staff did not properly discard expired medication Staff are not being properly trained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday September 26, 2024 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 1/11/2024. LPA met with Administrator Megan and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed staffing schedules, staff files, and CSMDR. The result of the investigation is as follows: Allegations: Unqualified staff is providing care and supervision to diabetic residents, Unqualified staff is administering medication, Staff mishandled the residents medical records LPA reviewed text messages between S1 and various facility employees. These text messages reveal that there were shifts when a nurse was not scheduled. However, LPA previously cited the facility on 10/11/2023 regarding unqualified staff performing insulin administration. LPA did not obtain or review any new information that the facility continued this practice after the citation wathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240111104820
Mar 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a comfortable and safe environment for residents Staff did not make sure backup generator was in working condition

LPA Parks arrived on Monday March 11, 2024, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff. LPA reviewed the generator’s test run log and the facility’s Emergency and Disaster Plan. LPA learned that there was a city-wide power outage from Sunday February 11th until the evening of Monday February 12th. While the facility does have a portable generator (which they share with their next-door sister facility Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living), the generator was not functioning properly. Upon the power outage, the generator was not putting out voltage. The generator service company determined there was a fuse that had burned out on the generator. The issue was immediately fixed and the company conducted the yearly service. The facility immediately began to follow their Emergency and Disaster Plan by dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240206164023
Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 10, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Unqualified staff administered insulin shots to residents. Staff falsified residents' medication records. Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fracture.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Tuesday October 10, 2023, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 4/6/2023. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, current and previous staff. LPA interviewed R1’s POA regarding the allegations. LPA reviewed R1’s file at the facility including physicians report, nursing notes, MARs, hospital discharge paperwork, physician’s orders, and employee notes regarding R1’s POA behavior to staff. The result of the investigation is as follows: Per staff interviews, S1 worked as the resident services director. At this time, the facility scheduled nurses for 12-hour shifts. Per interviews, there were no nurses scheduled for 7 days per week. According to the allegation, S1 would conduct blood sugar checks and give R2 their insulin. S2, who is a registered nurse, would then sign the MAR. According to Sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230406113411
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff grabbing resident arm and screaming in resident face. Staff failed to change resident.

LPA Parks arrived on Thursday September 28, 2023, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, previous and current facility staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file including physicians report, care plan, and progress notes. Based on interviews, no staff acknowledged having witnessed or heard about staff grabbing resident’s arm or screaming in their face. Additionally, there was no documentation of this occurring in resident’s file. Based on documentation review and staff interviews, R1 had a history of behaviors and, at times, was resistant to care. Based on staff interviews, R1 would, at times, refuse incontinence care. LPA was unable to verify R1’s shower schedule, only that they required one person assist. R1's progress notes detail R1's refusal of care, including incontinence care. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230117164126
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not adhering to Covid-19 masking protocols. Facility is not adhering to Covid-19 quarantining/isolation protocols. Facility is not adhering to Covid-19 testing protocols. Facility does not provide staff with adequate PPE.

LPA Parks arrived on Thursday September 28, 2023, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff. LPA reviewed the facility’s Infection Control Plan. Additionally, at the time the complaint was filed, LPA conducted a facility walk-through. The result of the investigation is as follows. Throughout the facility walk-though, LPA observed (and took photos) of PPE supply. Facility has cases of N95 masks, surgical masks, gloves, gowns, and face shields. LPA also observed cases of covid-tests. LPA observed PPE carts in the hallway of covid positive residents. LPA observed cases of individual bottles of hand sanitizer and large hand sanitizer stations (in the hallway and mounted on the wall). LPA observed covid positive residents to be quarantined in their apartments, as much as possible, in a memory carthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230310160924
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations11typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints17typical 2
Total complaints23typical 7
State visits on file41typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026230202556020246722023710420225512021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 409-4150

Is Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care licensed?

Yes — Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lincoln (Placer County): California license #312700042, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 132 residents. State records list 33 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 132 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED IN UNITS 111, 113-131. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.

How much does Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

61 of 132 beds occupied (46%) when the state visited on March 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 41 state visits and 33 dated documents since 2021 for Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care; 20 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

20 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are falsifying resident’s medication administration record Staff do not ensure that resident's medication is administered as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On March 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Director, Megan Gallagher to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA was accompanied by an observer from CCLD’s policy division. The department reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. It was reported that on October 19, 2024 R1 did not receive as needed pain medications as prescribed and requested. Physician’s orders for R1’s pain medication states as needed every 4 hours for pain. Statements alleged that at approximately 4:30 PM, On October 19, 2024, R1 requested pain medication. Med tech, S1, sought clarity of timing between R1’s medications before dispensing. Later in the evening, R1 again requested pain medication from S1. R1 alleged that medication was not dispensed at S1 left for water and did not return. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241030160128
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that resident's pendant calls are answered in a timely manner. Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On March 6, 2025,, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met withDirector, MeganGallagher. LPA was accompanied by an observer from CCLD’s policy division. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Regarding-Staff do not ensure that resident's pendant calls are answered in a timely manner. Records reviews, call records and staff interaction records did not support the allegation. Regarding- Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met. R1 records show R1 independently toilets and requires intermittent assistance. Supporting evidence was not found to support that R1's toileting needs are not met As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened orCDSS inspection report, March 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241031111456
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner. Facility has insufficient staff to provide care to residents. Staff not meeting resident’s dietary needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On February 12, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Administrator. The department conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy for the following allegations: Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner- The two incident for R1 that were mentioned on the complaint found that there was not sufficent evidence that the allegation could be substantiated. The incidents in July and August of 2024 where R1 experienced changes in their condition were documented and staff interviewed to show that staff responded as directed by R1's physician and according to R1's plan of care. Following each incident of a previously unidentified care need, R1's physician was contacted and the plan of care was updated as needed. Facility has insufficient staff to provide care to residenCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240904164258

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to seek medical attention for a UTI and dehydration.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Graham Gunby and Cheyenne Ratajczak arrived unannounced on 12/18/2024 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 1/17/2024. LPAs met with Executive Director, Megan Gallagher and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 18, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240117154538
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident wandered away from the facility due to lack of care and supervision Staff billed resident for services not rendered
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday September 26, 2024, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 7/25/2024. LPA met with Administrator Megan and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed R1’s physicians report, incident report, police report, resident assessment, monthly billing, email communication, and nursing notes. The result of the investigation is as follows: Allegation: Resident wandered away from the facility due to lack of care and supervision. At approximately 9pm on July 8, 2024, LPA learned that the delayed egress alarm on a second-floor door went off. Staff checked the alarm but did not check the hallway nor did they check to ensure all residents were accounted for. When the morning shift began on July 9, 2024, they noticed that R1 was not in the facility. Per the police report, the facility called in a missing person’CDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240725172932
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified staff is providing care and supervision to diabetic residents Unqualified staff is administering medication Staff mishandled the residents medical records Staff did not meet the residents medical needs while in care Staff mishandled the residents medications Staff did not properly discard expired medication Staff are not being properly trained
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday September 26, 2024 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 1/11/2024. LPA met with Administrator Megan and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed staffing schedules, staff files, and CSMDR. The result of the investigation is as follows: Allegations: Unqualified staff is providing care and supervision to diabetic residents, Unqualified staff is administering medication, Staff mishandled the residents medical records LPA reviewed text messages between S1 and various facility employees. These text messages reveal that there were shifts when a nurse was not scheduled. However, LPA previously cited the facility on 10/11/2023 regarding unqualified staff performing insulin administration. LPA did not obtain or review any new information that the facility continued this practice after the citation waCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240111104820
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide a comfortable and safe environment for residents Staff did not make sure backup generator was in working condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Parks arrived on Monday March 11, 2024, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff. LPA reviewed the generator’s test run log and the facility’s Emergency and Disaster Plan. LPA learned that there was a city-wide power outage from Sunday February 11th until the evening of Monday February 12th. While the facility does have a portable generator (which they share with their next-door sister facility Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living), the generator was not functioning properly. Upon the power outage, the generator was not putting out voltage. The generator service company determined there was a fuse that had burned out on the generator. The issue was immediately fixed and the company conducted the yearly service. The facility immediately began to follow their Emergency and Disaster Plan by dCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240206164023

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Unqualified staff administered insulin shots to residents. Staff falsified residents' medication records. Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fracture.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Tuesday October 10, 2023, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 4/6/2023. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, current and previous staff. LPA interviewed R1’s POA regarding the allegations. LPA reviewed R1’s file at the facility including physicians report, nursing notes, MARs, hospital discharge paperwork, physician’s orders, and employee notes regarding R1’s POA behavior to staff. The result of the investigation is as follows: Per staff interviews, S1 worked as the resident services director. At this time, the facility scheduled nurses for 12-hour shifts. Per interviews, there were no nurses scheduled for 7 days per week. According to the allegation, S1 would conduct blood sugar checks and give R2 their insulin. S2, who is a registered nurse, would then sign the MAR. According to SCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230406113411
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff grabbing resident arm and screaming in resident face. Staff failed to change resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Parks arrived on Thursday September 28, 2023, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, previous and current facility staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file including physicians report, care plan, and progress notes. Based on interviews, no staff acknowledged having witnessed or heard about staff grabbing resident’s arm or screaming in their face. Additionally, there was no documentation of this occurring in resident’s file. Based on documentation review and staff interviews, R1 had a history of behaviors and, at times, was resistant to care. Based on staff interviews, R1 would, at times, refuse incontinence care. LPA was unable to verify R1’s shower schedule, only that they required one person assist. R1's progress notes detail R1's refusal of care, including incontinence care. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230117164126
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not adhering to Covid-19 masking protocols. Facility is not adhering to Covid-19 quarantining/isolation protocols. Facility is not adhering to Covid-19 testing protocols. Facility does not provide staff with adequate PPE.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Parks arrived on Thursday September 28, 2023, to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff. LPA reviewed the facility’s Infection Control Plan. Additionally, at the time the complaint was filed, LPA conducted a facility walk-through. The result of the investigation is as follows. Throughout the facility walk-though, LPA observed (and took photos) of PPE supply. Facility has cases of N95 masks, surgical masks, gloves, gowns, and face shields. LPA also observed cases of covid-tests. LPA observed PPE carts in the hallway of covid positive residents. LPA observed cases of individual bottles of hand sanitizer and large hand sanitizer stations (in the hallway and mounted on the wall). LPA observed covid positive residents to be quarantined in their apartments, as much as possible, in a memory carCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230310160924
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not properly monitor resident's catheter Facility staff are not properly supervising residents who may be a fall risk Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday June 15, 2023, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 11/22/2022. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained purpose of visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff including the Administrator, nurses, med techs, and caregivers. LPA reviewed R1’s file at the facility including physicians report, progress notes, MARS (September, October, November), and a record of falls. Additionally, LPA interviewed R1’s home health company which provided skilled care for R1’s catheter. The result of the investigation is as follows: Based on notes on R1’s MAR, they were out of the facility for the following times: Sept 20 – 21, Oct 13 – Oct 22, Oct 31 – Nov 1, Nov 4 – Nov 5, Nov 9 – Nov 10, and Nov 12 – Nov 22. Additionally, based on progress notes and documented faxes to R1’s primary physicians, R1 fell on the following SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 15, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221122121630
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not safeguard resident belongings Facility staff physically abused resident in care Facility failed to report Resident was not given medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday June 15, 2023, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 1/11/2023. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained purpose of visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Business Office Director, previous memory care director, current and previous staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file at the facility including physicians report, progress notes, MARs from March – December 2022, LIC621, LIC500, personal service plan, preplacement appraisal and medication orders and communication with physicians. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA interviewed Business Office Director who stated that on 12/7/2022, it was reported to the Memory Care Director, at the time, that S1 witnessed S2 hitting R1. While S2 was being interviewed, they acknowledged that they grabbed R1’s hands and held them down. S2 suspended and later terminated. The facility acknowledged thaCDSS inspection report, June 15, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230111151017
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to monitor resident's water and food intake resulting in hospitalization
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Tuesday June 6, 2023, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 2/14/2023. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained purpose of visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff including nurses, med techs, caregivers, and activity staff. Med tech (S1) acknowledged they contacted the physician and POA regarding R1’s decline. S2, S3, and S4 stated that they offered snacks and hydration to R1. LPA reviewed R1’s file including the physicians report and assessment. The physicians report which was signed by a physician on 1/6/2023, stated that R1 had the capacity to feed themselves. Additionally, the facility assessment dated 1/7/2023, stated that R1 was independent for meals and did not require meal reminders. Due to the information above, LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evCDSS inspection report, June 6, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230214091816
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not distribute resident's medications as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday June 1, 2023 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 3/15/2023. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained purpose of visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff including nurses, med techs, and residents. Med techs acknowledged that they have an hour before and an hour the prescribed time to give medications to residents. Staff stated there have not been times (during AM and PM shift) where one med tech works both floors independently. Due to the complaint allegation not stating specific incidents, residents, dates, or staff, LPA was unable to further investigate. Due to the information above, LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, copy of report was provided viCDSS inspection report, June 1, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230315134023
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being inappropriately restrained while in care Resident was not properly assessed before residing in the facility Staff are not providing access to a resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday May 11, 2023 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 1/19/2023. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained purpose of visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff including Business Office Manager, Receptionist, Nurses, and caregivers. LPA reviewed resident’s file including physicians report, assessment, care plan, and power of attorney paperwork. The results of the investigation is as follows: R1 moved into the facility on January 7, 2023. In R1’s file, the personal service plan assessment was completed by an LVN and dated 1/7/2023. The assessment detailed that staff would be responsible for monitoring R1’s behaviors including aggression, agitation, and exit seeking. Per the assessment, the facility would also be responsible for the following care: status checks, redirecting, bathing, grooming reminders, toileting, laundry, and medication management. R1’s physicians repoCDSS inspection report, May 11, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230119123543
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident lost severe weight while in care Staff mismanaged resident’s medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday May 11, 2023 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 4/6/2023. LPA met with Administrator Mark and explained purpose of visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and facility staff including Marketing Director, Facility Nurses, Caregivers, med techs, R1’s Nurse Practitioner, wife and daughter. LPA reviewed resident’s file including physicians report, assessment, care plan, medication list, MARs, and PRN authorization form. The results of the investigation is as follows: LPA reviewed R1’s assessment which stated that R1 required total assistance for meals. R1’s weight upon move-in on February 20, 2023 was 162 pounds. R1 visited his primary physician and weighed 148 pounds on 3/24/2023. Additionally, R1’s MAR noted that R1’s weight was recorded as 142 on 4/3/2023 by staff. R1’s primary physician was contacted on 2/24/2023 regarding R1’s agitation and confusion, there is no record of the physiCDSS inspection report, May 11, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230406152123

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 41 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
17
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
23
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
41
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 409-4150
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Summerset Lincoln Assisted Living And Memory Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.