Grace Retirement Village is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Habra, Orange County, California — state license #306090049, licensed for 340 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 70 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated July 13, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Grace Retirement Village

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 340 residents · La Habra, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306090049, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1100 E. Whittier Blvd. · La Habra, Orange County
Phone
(562) 694-6515
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 280 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 340 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 280 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 86 times and filed 70 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 13, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 13, 2026
Occupancy at the April 22, 2025 visit
99 of 340 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 14, 2022 to April 22, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (15), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 55 of 70 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202515 state visits · 23 documents
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Memory Care residents are not being showered. Resident has an infection due to neglect by staff. Staff are not assisting residents who needs assistance with feeding.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to deliver findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrive at facility was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA spoke with Michelle Song, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included resident file review, tour of the physical plant of the facility and interviews conducted. It is alleged that memory care residents are not being showered. Record review reflects that facility uses a schedule as well as a shower body check from that caregivers use when showering the residents. The shower schedule reflects two shower schedules for morning and evening showers. Schedule and log reflect the residents in memory care that received showers and the time. Interview with 6 of 6 residents Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241223122921
Apr 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Excluded person is operating the facility Facility is not properly screening residents for Tuberculosis Facility is not allowing residents to select their own medical providers Facility is not ensuring residents’ medical needs are met Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to adequately manage the facility Facility falsified records Facility staff left residents unsupervised Facility staff are not providing medications as prescribed Facility staff are violating residents' personal rights Facility has insufficient food supplies Residents are not receiving treatment for scabies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on April 23, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Michelle Song. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that excluded person is operating the facility. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews one of fourteenth individuals interviewed confirmed the allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Licensing Information System (LIS) Facility Personnel Report Summary dated May 02, 2024. During the subsequent visit on April 11, 2025, LPA reviewed the Guardian Employee Roster dated April 10, 2025. Per LIS Facility Personnel Report Summary and Guardian Employee Roster, Staff 1 (S1) is not associated to the facility. During the course of the interviews with residethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240423112858
Apr 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not obtain timely medical treatment after resident sustained an unwitnessed fall.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA Tirre was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Administrator Michelle Song and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation including Los Angeles Community Hospital Records. The purpose of today’s visit is to follow up on an investigation conducted by the Department regarding the above allegation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on May 26, 2023. Per physician report dated June 07, 2023, R1 has a primary diagnosis of hypertension with no cognitive impairments. R1 is further listed as having a diagnosis of osteoporosis and able to communicate needs. On July 17, 2023, R1 was admitted to Los Angeles Community Hospital at 9:47 PM, after infothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230718165749
Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed a stage 3 pressure injury while in care due to neglect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre met with Administrator Michelle Song for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. The investigation consisted of the following: On October 5, 2023, the department toured the facility, obtained records, interviewed staff and witnesses. Based on records review, R1 was admitted to the facility on May 26, 2023. R1 is ambulatory and uses a walker, and no history of skin condition or breakdown according to physician’s report dated August 23, 2023. R1’s appraisal/needs and services plan dated August 23, 2023, indicates R1 uses a walker to ambulate, no limitation when transferring to bed, no disorientation, and occasionally incontinent. The department interviewed four staff (S1, S2, S3, S4). Medication technician (S1) stated caregivers reported to S4, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) that R1 has a sore on the back on September 15, 2023. Three staff (S1, S2, S3) stated they observed redness, a rash, or a small “red spot” at R1’the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20231004105837
Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff member did not treat residents with dignity and respect

Regarding the allegation: Staff member did not treat residents with dignity and respect 10 of 11 individuals denied the compliant allegation. During the investigation it was discovered the incident involving the police arriving at the facility was not caused or related to (S3). It is unclear exactly who the police were called on, but the police were not called because of a facility staff member or a facility resident. The police were called on someone visiting one of the residents or attempting to visit one of the residents. According to Staff 2 (S2) someone came to visit Resident 1 (R1) and the person arrived with an attitude. S2 explained that when the person was asked to sign in, the person refused, and the person was saying a lot of “F” words. S2 said the person was yelling and yelling, so S2 called 911 twice. S2 said R1’s family was also contacted. When a family member of R1 arrived at the facility, the family member of R1 had the person who was attempted to visit, arrested. Contithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240711144555
Apr 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member handles residents in a rough manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to complete the investigation into the allegation above. During the visit LPA Haley conducted, interviews, collected additional documents and toured the facility to make observations. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with 11 individuals, including interviews with facility residents and staff. Regarding the allegation: Staff member handles residents in a rough manner 10 of 11 individuals denied the complaint allegation. Staff 1 (S1) denied the allegation and added that Staff (3) is loved by the residents and added that, S3 is a good caregiver. Staff 4 (S4) said the same thing when specifically asked about S3. According to S4, S3 treats the residents good and some of the resident love S3. S4 added, S3’s voice is loud, but that’s just S3’s personality. S3 is not yelling. Further, during interviews with S4 and Staff 5 (S5) both said they would make a report if they ever witness a resident being handlethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240711144555
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not obtain timely medical care for resident. Facility staff did not ensure that resident was administered their medication(s) as prescribed. Facility staff offered oxygen to resident without a doctor's order. Facility staff failed to notify responsible party of injury.

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Michelle Song and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegations that facility staff did not obtain timely medical care for resident, facility staff did not ensure that resident was administered their medication(s) as prescribed, facility staff offered oxygen to resident without a doctor's order, and facility staff failed to notify responsible party of injury revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, Department staff inspected the facility, interviewed witnesses and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Physician’s Report dated February 28, 2024, R1’s Primary Care Medical Records, R1’s Home Health Medical Records, a facility communicationthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240624114306
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff at the facility do not have a criminal record clearance

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Michelle Song, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that staff at the facility do not have a criminal record clearance revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and staff schedule. CONTINUED Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250303114031
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202411 state visits · 14 documents
Nov 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is malodorous

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with (AD) Michelle Song and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility is malodorous revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster and staff roster. It was alleged that nearly every resident room has the “overwhelming smell of urine and feces.” On October 24, 2024, and November 4, 2024, LPA inspected the facility, including 35 resident rooms, and conducted health and safety checks on approximately 65 residents and LPA’s observations corroborated this allegation. LPA noted mild bad odors, including urine and feces odors, in the memory care common area, hallway, and resident rooms. LPA did not note anthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20241023161245
Nov 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff served expired food to residents. Facility does not have sufficient night staffing to meet residents needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Michelle Song and explained the reason for the visit. LPA and the Administrator toured the facility including the kitchen. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff served expired food to residents revealed the following. LPA toured the kitchen. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. LPA observed the refrigerators and freezers are kept at the required temperatures. LPA inspected the stored food supplies. LPA observed 49 boxes of cereal stored in the kitchen are expired. LPA verified with the Administrator who agreed 49 boxes of cereal are expired. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is substantiated. The investigation into the allegation facility does not have sufficient night staff to meet residents needs revealed the followithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20241010093603
Oct 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow proper food handling techniques

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator (AA) Michelle Song and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that staff did not follow proper food handling techniques revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed residents, staff, and witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster and staff roster. Regarding the allegation that staff did not follow proper food handling techniques: it was alleged that a witness observed staff giving one resident’s leftover food that they had started eating but did not finish to another resident because the kitchen had run out of that particular food item. LPA interviewed the witness who identified the staff at issue. LPA interviewed the staff at issue who denied the allegation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240507092306
Apr 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20239 state visits · 14 documents
Dec 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Joo Eun Ra. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Assistant (ADA) Anna Jung arrived shortly after. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on May 03, 2023. R1’s Physician report dated May 06, 2023, lists R1 as having a diagnosis of Hypertension and Type II Diabetes. R1 is noted as not being able to communicate needs but able to leave the facility unassisted. Four days later R1’s physician report was updated on May 10, 2023, as being able to communicate their needs with a note that said R1 wanted to handle their needs by themselves. During the investigation the Department spoke with the physician listed as completing the physician reports. A true signature was presented by the physician and their attorney. The Department determined the signature presthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230531150652
Dec 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident went AWOL from the facility due to lack of care and supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Administrator Assistant Anna Jung and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation including the Physician Report (LIC602) dated April 29, 2022, Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated May 1 2022, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated April 29, 2022, for Resident 1 (R1), Personnel Report (LIC500), Resident Roster, Fire Safety Inspection Request dated February 16, 2023 and Plan of Operation related to care of persons with Dementia. The purpose of today’s visit is to deliver the findings regarding the above allegation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: R1 was admitted to the facility officially on April 29, 2022, as per signed admission agthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220502151946
Nov 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not adequately supervise resident resulting in resident wandering from the facility and sustaining multiple injuries.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the complaint received on 6/20/23. LPA arrived at the facility and explained the purpose of today’s visit, was greeted and granted entry by staff on duty. Facility administrator (AD) Erik Doan was notified but was unable to be present during today’s visit. LPA De Perio met with assistant facility administrator Anna Jung. The complaint was investigated by the Department which involved interviews and record review. It is alleged that facility staff did not adequately supervise residents resulting in resident wandering from the facility and sustaining multiple injuries.The investigation revealed that resident (R1) was admitted to the facility on May 4, 2023, of which facility administrator and staff were informed that R1 was a fall risk but not an elopement risk because there was no history of R1 eloping. On May 4, 2023, a discharge summary report was completed by the Pasadenathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230620133756
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has inadequate security systems

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 05/02/22. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Crysel Santos and explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility has inadequate security systems. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Fire Safety Inspection Request dated 02/16/22. Per Fire Safety Inspection Request under special conditions, it states Memory Care and delayed egress. LPA also reviewed the Plan of Operation related to care of person with Dementia. Per Plan of Operation all facility exits are equipped with operational auditory alarms if exiting may pose a hazard to residents. During the initial visit on 05/06the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220502151946
Sep 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not maintain required liability insurance

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Rachel Chung and explained the reason for the visit. Adminstrator Crystal Santos was present as well. The department received a complaint on 06/02/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 06/07/2023. During the course of the investigation LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and obtained copies of liability insurance certificate. Regarding the allegation the facility does not maintain required liability insurance, the investigation revealed the following: The department received a complaint that the facility does not maintain the required insurance. Based on interviews with Licensee Eric Doan, Licensee was able to provide a copy of the liability insurance certificate. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230602120947
Aug 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations14typical 1
Type B citations13typical 1
Substantiated complaints27typical 2
Total complaints26typical 7
State visits on file86typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264402025152332024111422023182692022551
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (562) 694-6515

Is Grace Retirement Village licensed?

Yes — Grace Retirement Village is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Habra (Orange County): California license #306090049, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 340 residents. State records list 70 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 13, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Grace Retirement Village care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Grace Retirement Village with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 340 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 280 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20

How much does Grace Retirement Village cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Grace Retirement Village's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Grace Retirement Village accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Grace Retirement Village through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

99 of 340 beds occupied (29%) when the state visited on April 22, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Grace Retirement Village?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 86 state visits and 70 dated documents since 2022 for Grace Retirement Village; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 22, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMemory Care residents are not being showered. Resident has an infection due to neglect by staff. Staff are not assisting residents who needs assistance with feeding.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to deliver findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrive at facility was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA spoke with Michelle Song, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included resident file review, tour of the physical plant of the facility and interviews conducted. It is alleged that memory care residents are not being showered. Record review reflects that facility uses a schedule as well as a shower body check from that caregivers use when showering the residents. The shower schedule reflects two shower schedules for morning and evening showers. Schedule and log reflect the residents in memory care that received showers and the time. Interview with 6 of 6 residents Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241223122921
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedExcluded person is operating the facility Facility is not properly screening residents for Tuberculosis Facility is not allowing residents to select their own medical providers Facility is not ensuring residents’ medical needs are met Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to adequately manage the facility Facility falsified records Facility staff left residents unsupervised Facility staff are not providing medications as prescribed Facility staff are violating residents' personal rights Facility has insufficient food supplies Residents are not receiving treatment for scabies
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on April 23, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Michelle Song. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that excluded person is operating the facility. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews one of fourteenth individuals interviewed confirmed the allegations. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Licensing Information System (LIS) Facility Personnel Report Summary dated May 02, 2024. During the subsequent visit on April 11, 2025, LPA reviewed the Guardian Employee Roster dated April 10, 2025. Per LIS Facility Personnel Report Summary and Guardian Employee Roster, Staff 1 (S1) is not associated to the facility. During the course of the interviews with resideCDSS inspection report, April 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240423112858
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not obtain timely medical treatment after resident sustained an unwitnessed fall.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA Tirre was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Administrator Michelle Song and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation including Los Angeles Community Hospital Records. The purpose of today’s visit is to follow up on an investigation conducted by the Department regarding the above allegation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on May 26, 2023. Per physician report dated June 07, 2023, R1 has a primary diagnosis of hypertension with no cognitive impairments. R1 is further listed as having a diagnosis of osteoporosis and able to communicate needs. On July 17, 2023, R1 was admitted to Los Angeles Community Hospital at 9:47 PM, after infoCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230718165749
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident developed a stage 3 pressure injury while in care due to neglect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre met with Administrator Michelle Song for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. The investigation consisted of the following: On October 5, 2023, the department toured the facility, obtained records, interviewed staff and witnesses. Based on records review, R1 was admitted to the facility on May 26, 2023. R1 is ambulatory and uses a walker, and no history of skin condition or breakdown according to physician’s report dated August 23, 2023. R1’s appraisal/needs and services plan dated August 23, 2023, indicates R1 uses a walker to ambulate, no limitation when transferring to bed, no disorientation, and occasionally incontinent. The department interviewed four staff (S1, S2, S3, S4). Medication technician (S1) stated caregivers reported to S4, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) that R1 has a sore on the back on September 15, 2023. Three staff (S1, S2, S3) stated they observed redness, a rash, or a small “red spot” at R1’CDSS inspection report, April 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20231004105837
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member did not treat residents with dignity and respect
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Regarding the allegation: Staff member did not treat residents with dignity and respect 10 of 11 individuals denied the compliant allegation. During the investigation it was discovered the incident involving the police arriving at the facility was not caused or related to (S3). It is unclear exactly who the police were called on, but the police were not called because of a facility staff member or a facility resident. The police were called on someone visiting one of the residents or attempting to visit one of the residents. According to Staff 2 (S2) someone came to visit Resident 1 (R1) and the person arrived with an attitude. S2 explained that when the person was asked to sign in, the person refused, and the person was saying a lot of “F” words. S2 said the person was yelling and yelling, so S2 called 911 twice. S2 said R1’s family was also contacted. When a family member of R1 arrived at the facility, the family member of R1 had the person who was attempted to visit, arrested. ContiCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240711144555
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member handles residents in a rough manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to complete the investigation into the allegation above. During the visit LPA Haley conducted, interviews, collected additional documents and toured the facility to make observations. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with 11 individuals, including interviews with facility residents and staff. Regarding the allegation: Staff member handles residents in a rough manner 10 of 11 individuals denied the complaint allegation. Staff 1 (S1) denied the allegation and added that Staff (3) is loved by the residents and added that, S3 is a good caregiver. Staff 4 (S4) said the same thing when specifically asked about S3. According to S4, S3 treats the residents good and some of the resident love S3. S4 added, S3’s voice is loud, but that’s just S3’s personality. S3 is not yelling. Further, during interviews with S4 and Staff 5 (S5) both said they would make a report if they ever witness a resident being handleCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240711144555
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not obtain timely medical care for resident. Facility staff did not ensure that resident was administered their medication(s) as prescribed. Facility staff offered oxygen to resident without a doctor's order. Facility staff failed to notify responsible party of injury.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Michelle Song and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegations that facility staff did not obtain timely medical care for resident, facility staff did not ensure that resident was administered their medication(s) as prescribed, facility staff offered oxygen to resident without a doctor's order, and facility staff failed to notify responsible party of injury revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, Department staff inspected the facility, interviewed witnesses and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Physician’s Report dated February 28, 2024, R1’s Primary Care Medical Records, R1’s Home Health Medical Records, a facility communicationCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240624114306
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff at the facility do not have a criminal record clearance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Michelle Song, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that staff at the facility do not have a criminal record clearance revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and staff schedule. CONTINUED SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 6, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250303114031

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is malodorous
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with (AD) Michelle Song and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility is malodorous revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster and staff roster. It was alleged that nearly every resident room has the “overwhelming smell of urine and feces.” On October 24, 2024, and November 4, 2024, LPA inspected the facility, including 35 resident rooms, and conducted health and safety checks on approximately 65 residents and LPA’s observations corroborated this allegation. LPA noted mild bad odors, including urine and feces odors, in the memory care common area, hallway, and resident rooms. LPA did not note anCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20241023161245
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff served expired food to residents. Facility does not have sufficient night staffing to meet residents needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Michelle Song and explained the reason for the visit. LPA and the Administrator toured the facility including the kitchen. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff served expired food to residents revealed the following. LPA toured the kitchen. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. LPA observed the refrigerators and freezers are kept at the required temperatures. LPA inspected the stored food supplies. LPA observed 49 boxes of cereal stored in the kitchen are expired. LPA verified with the Administrator who agreed 49 boxes of cereal are expired. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is substantiated. The investigation into the allegation facility does not have sufficient night staff to meet residents needs revealed the followiCDSS inspection report, October 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20241010093603
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow proper food handling techniques
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator (AA) Michelle Song and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that staff did not follow proper food handling techniques revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed residents, staff, and witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster and staff roster. Regarding the allegation that staff did not follow proper food handling techniques: it was alleged that a witness observed staff giving one resident’s leftover food that they had started eating but did not finish to another resident because the kitchen had run out of that particular food item. LPA interviewed the witness who identified the staff at issue. LPA interviewed the staff at issue who denied the allegation.CDSS inspection report, May 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240507092306

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained injuries while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Joo Eun Ra. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Assistant (ADA) Anna Jung arrived shortly after. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on May 03, 2023. R1’s Physician report dated May 06, 2023, lists R1 as having a diagnosis of Hypertension and Type II Diabetes. R1 is noted as not being able to communicate needs but able to leave the facility unassisted. Four days later R1’s physician report was updated on May 10, 2023, as being able to communicate their needs with a note that said R1 wanted to handle their needs by themselves. During the investigation the Department spoke with the physician listed as completing the physician reports. A true signature was presented by the physician and their attorney. The Department determined the signature presCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230531150652
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident went AWOL from the facility due to lack of care and supervision
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Administrator Assistant Anna Jung and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation including the Physician Report (LIC602) dated April 29, 2022, Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated May 1 2022, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated April 29, 2022, for Resident 1 (R1), Personnel Report (LIC500), Resident Roster, Fire Safety Inspection Request dated February 16, 2023 and Plan of Operation related to care of persons with Dementia. The purpose of today’s visit is to deliver the findings regarding the above allegation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: R1 was admitted to the facility officially on April 29, 2022, as per signed admission agCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220502151946
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not adequately supervise resident resulting in resident wandering from the facility and sustaining multiple injuries.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the complaint received on 6/20/23. LPA arrived at the facility and explained the purpose of today’s visit, was greeted and granted entry by staff on duty. Facility administrator (AD) Erik Doan was notified but was unable to be present during today’s visit. LPA De Perio met with assistant facility administrator Anna Jung. The complaint was investigated by the Department which involved interviews and record review. It is alleged that facility staff did not adequately supervise residents resulting in resident wandering from the facility and sustaining multiple injuries.The investigation revealed that resident (R1) was admitted to the facility on May 4, 2023, of which facility administrator and staff were informed that R1 was a fall risk but not an elopement risk because there was no history of R1 eloping. On May 4, 2023, a discharge summary report was completed by the PasadenaCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230620133756
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has inadequate security systems
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 05/02/22. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Crysel Santos and explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility has inadequate security systems. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Fire Safety Inspection Request dated 02/16/22. Per Fire Safety Inspection Request under special conditions, it states Memory Care and delayed egress. LPA also reviewed the Plan of Operation related to care of person with Dementia. Per Plan of Operation all facility exits are equipped with operational auditory alarms if exiting may pose a hazard to residents. During the initial visit on 05/06CDSS inspection report, September 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220502151946
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not maintain required liability insurance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Rachel Chung and explained the reason for the visit. Adminstrator Crystal Santos was present as well. The department received a complaint on 06/02/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 06/07/2023. During the course of the investigation LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and obtained copies of liability insurance certificate. Regarding the allegation the facility does not maintain required liability insurance, the investigation revealed the following: The department received a complaint that the facility does not maintain the required insurance. Based on interviews with Licensee Eric Doan, Licensee was able to provide a copy of the liability insurance certificate. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 31, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230602120947
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to administer medication as prescribed Facility refused resident access to telephone
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry to facility by LVN Grace Park and explained the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint on 06/02/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted an initial visit on 06/07/2023. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of medication administration records, physician’s report and admission agreements. Regarding the allegations Facility failed to administer medication as prescribed and Facility refused resident access to telephone, the investigation revealed the following: It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was not receiving their medications and that cell phone access was restricted by the facility. Based on interviews with witnesses it was reported that R1's family retrieved R1's cell phone on 05/31/2023. CONT on LIC 9099-C dated 08/02/2023 UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 2, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230602142710
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is operating understaffed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 05/02/22. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Staff Rachel Chung and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Erik Doan was notified via telephone. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility is operating understaffed. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Three of eleven individuals interviewed denied the allegation. Five individuals reported that hiring more staff would be helpful and the remaining three individuals were not able to be contacted by LPA. As of 06/19/23 facility reported a total census of eighty-three residents. Records reviewed by LPA Ramirez included the staff schedule. On average there are four caregivers and one medication technician for the morniCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220502151946
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not release records to resident's responsible party
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Rachel Shung and explained the reason for the visit. Grace Park, LVN was present as well. The department received a complaint on 07/06/2023 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted on 07/07/2023. During the course of the invesitgation LPA Mendivil interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation Staff did not release records to resident's responsible party, the invesitgation revealed the following: Based on interviews with witnesses the request was delivered via certified mail on 06/23/2023. Based on interviews with staff there is conflicting information as to who is responsible for sending the documents. Based on iInterview with a witness the documents requested have not been received as of 07/24/2023. CONT on 9099-C dated 07/25/2023 SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 25, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230706132440
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not meet resident’s needs. Facility staff did not follow doctor’s orders.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator Erik Doan was notified via telephone and arrived later to assist with the visit. On July 6, 2022, LPA Sean Haddad conducted an initial complaint investigation visit at the facility.LPA met with Administrator (AD) Hyo Sook Kim, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegations. During the inspection, LPA interviewed AD and requested and reviewed copies of resident roster, staff roster, resident files, and other pertinent records. During a follow-up visit conducted on June 23, 2023, LPA requested resident R1's records kept at the facility after his passing on June 28, 2022. Facility staff was unable to provide the records on that day. CONCDSS inspection report, July 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220629095332
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not allow resident to have visitors
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 05/31/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Erik Doan and explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not allow resident to have visitors. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Eight of ten individuals interviewed denied the allegation. As for the remaining two individuals, one individual confirmed the allegation and the other could not be interviewed as they were on vacation. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Visitor Sign In/Out Log dated 04/29/23 through 06/18/23. Per Visitor Sign In/Out Log on 05/14/23 a visitor for Resident 1 (R1) sign in at 7:45 AM and sign out at 8:10 AM. On average per dayCDSS inspection report, June 30, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230531150652
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident went AWOL from the facility. Facility floor is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Facility administrator was notified by telephone and informed of the report. An initial investigation visit was conducted on April 27, 2022. LPA Sean Haddad inspected the facility, interviewed one resident and three staff members. LPA also requested and reviewed copies of resident roster, staff roster, and facility records. Regarding the allegation that Resident went AWOL from the facility, the following has been concluded: On April 17 2022, facility became unable to locate resident R1 at approximately 2:30PM. After being notified of the resident's absence, the facility administrator called the La Habra Police Department. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220418111625
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not respond to resident's call for help in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings in the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by nursing staff before explaining the purpose of the visit and listing the allegation. Administrator Erik Doan was notified by telephone and arrived later to assist with the visit. An initial complaint investigation visit was conducted on January 26, 2023. LPA accompanied by then administrator Hyo Sook Kim toured the unit assigned to resident R1. Resident records reviewed and an interview of the caregiver on staff in the early hours of January 18, 2023 was conducted by telephone. Additional interview conducted with facility administrator. A subpoena of medical records from resident R1's trip to the emergency department at UCI Hospital was submitted and records reviewed. Additional witnesses interviews were conducted via telephone. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC909CDSS inspection report, April 12, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230119153437
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not release resident records to the legal representative.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Rachel Shung and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Monica Kim was available via telephone and later arrived at facility. The department received a complaint on 03/23/2023 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted on 03/27/2023. During the course of the invesitgation LPA Mendivil interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation facility did not release resident records to the legal representative, the invesitgation revealed the following: Based on interviews with the Administrator Monica Kim the facility received a formal request for a resident's documents on 3/21/2023. Based on interviews with staff there is conflicting information as to who is responsible for sending the documents. Interview with a witness reports that the documents are still not received as of 3/27/2023. CONT on 9099-C dated 03/2CDSS inspection report, March 27, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230323114408

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 86 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
14
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
13
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
27
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
26
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
86
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(562) 694-6515
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Grace Retirement Village? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.