Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Habra, Orange County, California — state license #306004192, licensed for 196 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 80 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 10, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 196 residents · La Habra, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306004192, held since 2010 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
200 West Whittier Blvd. · La Habra, Orange County
Phone
(562) 691-1200
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 196 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
196 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN, HOSPICE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE FOR 22State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 108 times and filed 80 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 10, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the September 10, 2024 visit
127 of 196 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 15, 2021 to September 10, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unfounded” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 69 of 80 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20267 state visits · 9 documents
May 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202520 state visits · 35 documents
Nov 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202418 state visits · 22 documents
Dec 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident Staff do not have adequate record keeping for a resident

This unannounced investigation inspection by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dwayne Mason Jr. is being conducted to conclude this agency’s investigation in the complaint allegation(s) mentioned above. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted by Receptionist. LPA met with Faye Shen, Chief Operating Officer and explained the nature of the inspection. The department received a complaint on 7/24/2024 stating staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident and that staff do not have adequate record keeping for a resident. During the investigation, the department interviewed the Chief Operating Officer (COO), staff and residents in care. (continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240724140359
Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident's incontinent needs are not being met.

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that a resident's incontinent needs are not being met revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, Chief Operating Officer (COO) Faye Shen, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Resident Appraisal dated June 22, 2018, R1’s Physician’s Report dated September 9, 2019, R1’s Physician’s Report dated October 8, 2019, and R1’s Admission Agreement dated June 22, 2018. CONTINUED Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 22-AS-20201221092131
Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff enters room without knocking on the door Staff turns off lights without consent

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate n investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and resident. Regarding the allegations that staff turns off lights without consent and staff enters room without knocking on the door, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1's (R1) room has signage posted on the door requesting staff to ring doorbell which has been installed. Posted signage states "Do not enter" without the resident's approval and following certain steps. Three out of three staff interviewed state ringing the doorbell before entering the room but indicate the resident does not always hear the doorbell. Resident indicates no staff should ever enter without the resident's approval. Staff 1 (S1) states entering the resident's room with approthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240702095631
Jul 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee failed to eradicate insect infestation

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Chief Operating Officer (COO) Faye Shen, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that the licensee failed to eradicate insect infestation revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed COO and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and the facility’s recent pest control invoices. CONTINUED Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240628153302
Jun 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner.

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with staff Kate Bernal, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa was not present during the inspection. The investigation into the allegation that staff handled resident in a rough manner revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, an Unusual Incident Report received May 17, 2024, Resident #1’s (R1) Physician’s Report dated November 2, 2023, R1’s Monthly Case Manager Visit Summary dated April 18, 2024, and R1’s Assisted Living Waiver Assessment dated November 22, 2023. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 24, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240520140910
Jun 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly addressing pest infestation in facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as extermination records. Regarding the allegation that staff are not properly addressing pest infestation in facility, the investigation revealed the following: Facility staff indicate spraying resident rooms once advised of pests infestation and obtaining outside extermination. Rooms 135R, 105R and 230 were exterminated by Outstanding Pest Solutions on 06/10/2024. Facility indicates rooms 137L, 121, and 210 refused extermination. Two out of three residents of noted rooms deny refusing extermination. During the visit, LPA observed ants in room 137L and cockroaches on bed and table in room 210.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240617103710
Apr 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents smoke in the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations made January 18, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a witness, document review, and observations. A total of 9 individuals were interviewed during the investigation and observations were made by LPA Haley during both visits to the facility. Regarding the complaint allegation: Residents smoke in the facility During the investigation, 4 of 5 staff members confirmed residents smoke in their room or have smelled smoke inside the facility. Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (2) both acknowledged Resident 1 (R1) has a history of smoking inside R1's room. S1 and S2 both acknowledged they try to monitor the resident and make sure R1 goes to the designated smoking area. Continued on LIC9099C Substanthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240118101539
Apr 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff drink alcohol in the facility Facility room is malodorous Facility is not kept free of pests

Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff drink alcohol in the facility During the investigation 8 of 9 individuals interviewed either denied or were unable to support the complaint allegation above. Staff 1 (S1) denied the complaint allegation and stated staff are not allowed to consume alcohol on their shift or work while intoxicated. Resident's are allowed to drink alcohol, as it's their personal right, as long as they drink responsibly and are not intoxicated. Staff 2 (S2) denied drinking while on duty and denied ever being intoxicated while on duty. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility room is malodorous. During the investigation 5 of 5 staff denied the allegation above. Staff 5 (S5) stated some rooms have an odor because they have pets, but they clean up and after the room is clean the odor is not that strong. Continued on LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240118101539
Apr 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure hot water heater works properly

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Chief Operations Officer (COO) Faye Shen and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that staff did not ensure hot water heater works properly revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and a water shut-off notice dated April 5, 2024. Regarding the allegation that the staff did not ensure hot water heater works properly: it was alleged that the facility’s hot water goes out regularly, the longest outage lasted three days, and the most recent outage was during the week of March 25, 2024. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240402152116
Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure that resident's personal rights were respected Facility staff are not properly trained Facility staff did not ensure that resident's relationships with staff were accorded dignity

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by Chief Operating Officer- Faye Shen. It was alleged that facility did not ensure that resident's personal rights were respected. 4 out of the 5 resident interviews conducted did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that staff are respectful. 1 out of the 5 resident interviews stated that resident 1 (R1) does not like when staff enter their room, and added that only certain staff are allowed in their room due to personal preference. 3 out of the 3 staff interviews conducted did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that upon hire, staff are required to complete training regarding personal rights. LPA De Perio conducted a record review and observed that 3 out of the 3 staff had completed training regarding personal rights. It was alleged that facility staff are not properly trainedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240102113340
Mar 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide adequate notice of rate change to residents and/or POA/responsible party

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility did not provide adequate notice of rate change to residents and/or POA/responsible party revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and a rent increase notice dated 02/26/24. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not provide adequate notice of rate change to residents and/or POA/responsible party: it was alleged that the facility did not provide proper notice of a rate change to residents. LPA requested and reviewed a rent increase notice dated 02/26/24 which indicates a rate increase will be effective on 03/31/24. Substantiatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240306120233
Mar 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was injured by a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced subsequent visit for the purpose of continuing the investigation and delivering the findings into the above allegation. LPA met with Chief Operating Officer (COO) Faye Shen and General Manager (GM) Allen Nishikawa and explained the reason for the visit. On July 13, 2023, LPA initiated the complaint investigation. A subsequent visit was conducted on October 19, 2023. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed four residents and eight staff and obtained the following documentation: resident/staff rosters, June 2023 staff schedule, Incident Report dated July 6, 2023, Communication Logs from June 6, 2023, to June 29, 2023, floor plan, and four resident records which includes the face sheet and physician’s report. During today’s visit, LPA reviewed the records received. The investigation revealed the following: It is alleged that a resident was injured by a resident in care. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230707101643
Feb 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not maintaining a comfortable temperature in the dining room and resident are too cold.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by Chief Operating Officer - Faye Shen. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that the facility is not maintaining a comfortable temperature in the dining room and residents are too cold. During the tour of the physical plant of the facility, LPA observed that the temperature at the entrance of the dining room was observed to be at 76 degrees Fahrenheit, and the temperature in the central part of the dining room was measured to be at 75.0 degrees Fahrenheit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240111151910
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident with medication management. Resident did not receive medication as prescribed.

On this Day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Steve Shen, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 12/08/2023 and the initial 10-day visit on 12/15/2023. During the visit LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of physician reports, admission agreement and appraisal. Regarding the allegations staff do not assist resident with medication management and resident did not receive medication as prescribed, the investigation revealed the following: Per review of Resident 1 (R1) physician report dated 04/26/2023 it is reported that R1 is able to administer their own medications and R1 is able to administer their PRN medications.Based on an interview with Chief Operating Officer Faye Shen, R1 is independent and does not want assistance from the Med-Techs for medication management. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231208160644
Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek medical attention Resident has no bedsheets

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility for and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by chief operating officer (S1) Faye Shen. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that facility did not seek medical attention. LPA conducted a total of 6 resident interviews who did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that the facility does contact 911 when needed or upon request. A total of 3 staff interviews were conducted, including the resident's (R1) nurse from an outside agency, of which all 3 interviews also did not corroborate with the allegation. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230922124616
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations19typical 1
Type B citations18typical 1
Substantiated complaints39typical 2
Total complaints64typical 7
State visits on file108typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2010.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026790202520350202418223202357220226722021222
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (562) 691-1200

Is Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care licensed?

Yes — Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Habra (Orange County): California license #306004192, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 196 residents. State records list 80 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 10, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record196 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN, HOSPICE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE FOR 22

How much does Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

127 of 196 beds occupied (65%) when the state visited on September 10, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 108 state visits and 80 dated documents since 2021 for Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 10, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident Staff do not have adequate record keeping for a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced investigation inspection by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dwayne Mason Jr. is being conducted to conclude this agency’s investigation in the complaint allegation(s) mentioned above. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted by Receptionist. LPA met with Faye Shen, Chief Operating Officer and explained the nature of the inspection. The department received a complaint on 7/24/2024 stating staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident and that staff do not have adequate record keeping for a resident. During the investigation, the department interviewed the Chief Operating Officer (COO), staff and residents in care. (continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240724140359
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident's incontinent needs are not being met.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that a resident's incontinent needs are not being met revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, Chief Operating Officer (COO) Faye Shen, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) Resident Appraisal dated June 22, 2018, R1’s Physician’s Report dated September 9, 2019, R1’s Physician’s Report dated October 8, 2019, and R1’s Admission Agreement dated June 22, 2018. CONTINUED UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2024 · control 22-AS-20201221092131
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff enters room without knocking on the door Staff turns off lights without consent
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate n investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and resident. Regarding the allegations that staff turns off lights without consent and staff enters room without knocking on the door, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1's (R1) room has signage posted on the door requesting staff to ring doorbell which has been installed. Posted signage states "Do not enter" without the resident's approval and following certain steps. Three out of three staff interviewed state ringing the doorbell before entering the room but indicate the resident does not always hear the doorbell. Resident indicates no staff should ever enter without the resident's approval. Staff 1 (S1) states entering the resident's room with approCDSS inspection report, July 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240702095631
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee failed to eradicate insect infestation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Chief Operating Officer (COO) Faye Shen, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that the licensee failed to eradicate insect infestation revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed COO and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and the facility’s recent pest control invoices. CONTINUED UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 2, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240628153302
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with staff Kate Bernal, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa was not present during the inspection. The investigation into the allegation that staff handled resident in a rough manner revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, an Unusual Incident Report received May 17, 2024, Resident #1’s (R1) Physician’s Report dated November 2, 2023, R1’s Monthly Case Manager Visit Summary dated April 18, 2024, and R1’s Assisted Living Waiver Assessment dated November 22, 2023. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 24, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240520140910
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly addressing pest infestation in facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as extermination records. Regarding the allegation that staff are not properly addressing pest infestation in facility, the investigation revealed the following: Facility staff indicate spraying resident rooms once advised of pests infestation and obtaining outside extermination. Rooms 135R, 105R and 230 were exterminated by Outstanding Pest Solutions on 06/10/2024. Facility indicates rooms 137L, 121, and 210 refused extermination. Two out of three residents of noted rooms deny refusing extermination. During the visit, LPA observed ants in room 137L and cockroaches on bed and table in room 210.CDSS inspection report, June 18, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240617103710
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents smoke in the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations made January 18, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a witness, document review, and observations. A total of 9 individuals were interviewed during the investigation and observations were made by LPA Haley during both visits to the facility. Regarding the complaint allegation: Residents smoke in the facility During the investigation, 4 of 5 staff members confirmed residents smoke in their room or have smelled smoke inside the facility. Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (2) both acknowledged Resident 1 (R1) has a history of smoking inside R1's room. S1 and S2 both acknowledged they try to monitor the resident and make sure R1 goes to the designated smoking area. Continued on LIC9099C SubstanCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240118101539
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff drink alcohol in the facility Facility room is malodorous Facility is not kept free of pests
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff drink alcohol in the facility During the investigation 8 of 9 individuals interviewed either denied or were unable to support the complaint allegation above. Staff 1 (S1) denied the complaint allegation and stated staff are not allowed to consume alcohol on their shift or work while intoxicated. Resident's are allowed to drink alcohol, as it's their personal right, as long as they drink responsibly and are not intoxicated. Staff 2 (S2) denied drinking while on duty and denied ever being intoxicated while on duty. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility room is malodorous. During the investigation 5 of 5 staff denied the allegation above. Staff 5 (S5) stated some rooms have an odor because they have pets, but they clean up and after the room is clean the odor is not that strong. Continued on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240118101539
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure hot water heater works properly
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Chief Operations Officer (COO) Faye Shen and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that staff did not ensure hot water heater works properly revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and a water shut-off notice dated April 5, 2024. Regarding the allegation that the staff did not ensure hot water heater works properly: it was alleged that the facility’s hot water goes out regularly, the longest outage lasted three days, and the most recent outage was during the week of March 25, 2024. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 9, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240402152116
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not ensure that resident's personal rights were respected Facility staff are not properly trained Facility staff did not ensure that resident's relationships with staff were accorded dignity
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by Chief Operating Officer- Faye Shen. It was alleged that facility did not ensure that resident's personal rights were respected. 4 out of the 5 resident interviews conducted did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that staff are respectful. 1 out of the 5 resident interviews stated that resident 1 (R1) does not like when staff enter their room, and added that only certain staff are allowed in their room due to personal preference. 3 out of the 3 staff interviews conducted did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that upon hire, staff are required to complete training regarding personal rights. LPA De Perio conducted a record review and observed that 3 out of the 3 staff had completed training regarding personal rights. It was alleged that facility staff are not properly trainedCDSS inspection report, March 19, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240102113340
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide adequate notice of rate change to residents and/or POA/responsible party
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Allen Nishikawa and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility did not provide adequate notice of rate change to residents and/or POA/responsible party revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and a rent increase notice dated 02/26/24. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not provide adequate notice of rate change to residents and/or POA/responsible party: it was alleged that the facility did not provide proper notice of a rate change to residents. LPA requested and reviewed a rent increase notice dated 02/26/24 which indicates a rate increase will be effective on 03/31/24. SubstantiateCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240306120233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was injured by a resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an unannounced subsequent visit for the purpose of continuing the investigation and delivering the findings into the above allegation. LPA met with Chief Operating Officer (COO) Faye Shen and General Manager (GM) Allen Nishikawa and explained the reason for the visit. On July 13, 2023, LPA initiated the complaint investigation. A subsequent visit was conducted on October 19, 2023. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed four residents and eight staff and obtained the following documentation: resident/staff rosters, June 2023 staff schedule, Incident Report dated July 6, 2023, Communication Logs from June 6, 2023, to June 29, 2023, floor plan, and four resident records which includes the face sheet and physician’s report. During today’s visit, LPA reviewed the records received. The investigation revealed the following: It is alleged that a resident was injured by a resident in care. [Continued on LIC9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230707101643
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not maintaining a comfortable temperature in the dining room and resident are too cold.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by Chief Operating Officer - Faye Shen. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that the facility is not maintaining a comfortable temperature in the dining room and residents are too cold. During the tour of the physical plant of the facility, LPA observed that the temperature at the entrance of the dining room was observed to be at 76 degrees Fahrenheit, and the temperature in the central part of the dining room was measured to be at 75.0 degrees Fahrenheit. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240111151910

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist resident with medication management. Resident did not receive medication as prescribed.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this Day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Steve Shen, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 12/08/2023 and the initial 10-day visit on 12/15/2023. During the visit LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of physician reports, admission agreement and appraisal. Regarding the allegations staff do not assist resident with medication management and resident did not receive medication as prescribed, the investigation revealed the following: Per review of Resident 1 (R1) physician report dated 04/26/2023 it is reported that R1 is able to administer their own medications and R1 is able to administer their PRN medications.Based on an interview with Chief Operating Officer Faye Shen, R1 is independent and does not want assistance from the Med-Techs for medication management. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, December 29, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231208160644
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not seek medical attention Resident has no bedsheets
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility for and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by chief operating officer (S1) Faye Shen. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that facility did not seek medical attention. LPA conducted a total of 6 resident interviews who did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that the facility does contact 911 when needed or upon request. A total of 3 staff interviews were conducted, including the resident's (R1) nurse from an outside agency, of which all 3 interviews also did not corroborate with the allegation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230922124616
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff locked residents in their rooms Staff tied up residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegations. LPA met with General Manager (GM) Allen Nishikawa, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The allegations that staff locked residents in their rooms and staff tied up residents were investigated by the Department and consisted of inspections, interviews conducted with the facility staff, Administrator, witnesses, and residents, as well as documentation review, and revealed the following: Staff admitted to restraining residents while they were in their wheelchairs with a Posey Gait belt. One of the Posey Gait belts was confiscated and placed into IB evidence. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 28, 2023 · control 22-AS-20200917140130
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide complete records to resident's responsible party.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Medication Technician Angie Rentutar and Administrator Carol Lee arrived during the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as Resident 1's file (R1). Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not provide complete records to resident's responsible party, the investigation revealed the following: Facility received a request for medical records from Tonon Attorney Service via Valentine Law Group on 11/18/2022. Facility provided partial records including physician reports and medication orders on 02/13/2023. Facility did not provide any other medical or facility records as requested. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230317120537
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not file required reports regarding resident injuries
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. During the investigation, LPA Haley made two unannounced visits to the facility to gather additional information on the complaint allegations. The initial visit was made October 28, 2022, and a follow up visit was made February 8, 2023. During the unannounced visits to the facility LPA Haley interview residents and staff. Furthermore, LPA Haley conducted telephone interviews to obtain additional details on the complaint allegations. Regarding the allegation, Staff did not file required reports regarding resident injuries During the investigation, LPA Haley interviewed Facility COO Fae Chin who provided LPA Haley a copy of the incident report, and Facility Incident Log that was written regarding the incident and faxed to the Orange County Adult and Senior Care Program Regional Office October 10, 2022. Continued on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221021170228
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing a safe environment for residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. During the investigation, LPA Haley made two unannounced visits to the facility to gather additional information on the complaint allegations. The initial visit was made October 28, 2022, and a follow up visit was made February 8, 2023. During the unannounced visits to the facility LPA Haley interview residents and staff. Furthermore, LPA Haley conducted telephone interviews to obtain additional details on the complaint allegations. Regarding the allegation, Staff are not providing a safe environment for residents in care During the investigation, LPA Haley interviewed 10 residents, 6 staff members, and facility COO Fae Chin. None of the individuals interviewed could confirm this allegation to be true. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221021170228

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff changed resident's diaper without permission.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Carol Lee, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that Staff changed resident's diaper without permission revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed AD, 2 staff, and 2 residents, and requested and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and resident files. It was reported that staff changed Resident #1’s (R1) diaper without permission. Per AD, R1 moved out of the facility on 08/04/22. Review of R1’s Physician Report dated 01/07/22, Preplacement Appraisal Information dated 12/10/21, and Enhanced Residential Care Services Assessment dated 01/24/22 revealed that R1 is diagnosed with depression and suicidal ideation, but it is unclear whether R1 wears diapers. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 11, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220804171850
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff member withdrew money from resident's account without authorization
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Carol Lee and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation of Facility staff member withdrew money from resident's account without authorization revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility via tele-visit on 11/2/20 and 11/10/20, interviewed Witness #1 (W1), Resident #1 (R1), and Staff #1 (S1), and obtained and reviewed records including admission agreement, emails between witnesses, bank records, and accounting and financial records. On 11/2/20, LPA interviewed W1, confirmed allegations, and requested documents. On 11/10/20, LPA interviewed R1 who stated their rent at the facility is handled by the administrator, W1, and Witness #2 (W2). R1 also stated they did not give tCDSS inspection report, June 21, 2022 · control 22-AS-20201027115455
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident needs are not met due to staffing shortage
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA Velazquez was allowed entry into the facility and met with Administrator Carol Lee. On today's visit LPA Velazquez reviewed facility, staff, and resident records. LPA Velazquez also conducted interviews with staff and residents. During the course of the investigation LPA reviewed facility, staff, and resident records. Records reviewed included resident and staff rosters, staff schedules, levels of care assessment, call lights logs, resident physician's reports, identification and emergency information, resident appraisal needs and services plans, and resident admission agreements. Administrator Lee also provided copies of invoices from Clipboard Health which is the temp agency the facility used to hire temporary staff from January through March of 2022. LPA Velazquez also conducted interviews with staff and residents who were not able to corroborate the aboCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220210124439
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident's call light in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Carol Lee, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegation. The investigation into the allegation that staff did not respond to a resident's call light in a timely manner revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility’s kitchen, common areas, hallways, and 9 resident rooms, interviewed 3 staff and 6 residents, and requested and reviewed the resident roster, staff roster, staff schedule, photographs of insects at the facility, and pest control records. The investigation into the allegation that staff did not respond to Resident #1’s (R1) call light in a timely manner revealed the following: SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220408162727

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 108 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
19
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
18
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
39
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
64
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
108
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(562) 691-1200
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Whitten Heights Assisted Living And Memory Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.