Hills Of Rockaway, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Placentia, Orange County, California — state license #306006133, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated July 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

23 homes in view

Hills Of Rockaway, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Placentia, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006133, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
919 E Rockaway Drive · Placentia, Orange County
Phone
(909) 450-1699
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 5 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR FIVE(5) NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE(1) BEDRIDDEN. ROOM #4 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR FIVE(5) HOSPICE RESIDENTSState service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 17, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 17, 2026
Occupancy at the February 24, 2026 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 30, 2025 to February 24, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 27 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
202616 state visits · 17 documents
Jul 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure facility has an adequate food supply Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier Staff do not ensure resident is being assisted with dressing

On this Day, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Andrea Mendivil and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 02/18/2026. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegations Staff do not ensure facility has an adequate food supply and Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier , staff do not ensure resident is being assisted with dressing and, the investigation revealed the following: It was alleged the facility does not retain a minimum of 2 day perishbles and 7 day non-perishbles food on hand. LPAs observed the facility to have 2 refridgerators and a kitchen pantry with food available. It was alleged the staff is unable to communicate with residents due to lanaguage barrier, per interviews with 3 staff present and 1 staff via phone LPAs were able to communicate with staff without issue. Unsubstthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260218135245
Feb 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in financial distress Insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez for the purpose of delivering findings. LPA met with Staff Chester Gutierrez and explained the purpose of the inspection. Regarding allegation, Facility is in financial distress, the following was revealed: It is alleged the facility is in financial distress due to notice received from the water company indicating the water at the facility would be shut off, staff salaries not being paid, and food delivery being delayed due to bills not paid. Interviews were conducted with five facility residents and three staff. During their interview, three of five residents were unable to confirm or deny the allegation, however, stated the utilities at the facility have been and continue to be operational and food supply is always sufficient in quantity to meet their needs. Two of three residents were unable to confirm or deny allegations or indicate if there has been an interruptionthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260116102240
Jan 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 7 documents
Oct 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: The facility does not have sufficient resources to meet operating costs for care of residents.

An office visit was scheduled on this day with Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert for the purposes of delivering findings into the above allegations. LPA met with Licensees Maricel Nepomuceno, Allen Medina and Keak Vongphakdy. It was alleged the facility does not have sufficient resources to meet operating costs for care of residents. The investigation determined as follows: The Department conducted an audit of the facility finances based on the Licensee’s 2024 Monthly Operating Statement. Per the review of facility finances, withdrawals exceeded deposits by $8,440.57 in January of 2024 which indicate a net loss. The amounts reported on the LIC 401 could not be directly traced to the bank statements and additional support was not provided by the licensee, therefore, reasonable assurance could not be provided that the facility is generating income to cover operating expenses for January 2024. A review of the facility bills and monthly mortgage payment appeared to show paymentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230927113557
Jul 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file30typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026161702025571202411020232202022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 450-1699

Is Hills Of Rockaway, The licensed?

Yes — Hills Of Rockaway, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Placentia (Orange County): California license #306006133, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 17, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Hills Of Rockaway, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Hills Of Rockaway, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR FIVE(5) NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE(1) BEDRIDDEN. ROOM #4 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR FIVE(5) HOSPICE RESIDENTS

How much does Hills Of Rockaway, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Hills Of Rockaway, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Hills Of Rockaway, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Hills Of Rockaway, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on February 24, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Hills Of Rockaway, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2022 for Hills Of Rockaway, The; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 24, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure facility has an adequate food supply Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier Staff do not ensure resident is being assisted with dressing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this Day, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Andrea Mendivil and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 02/18/2026. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegations Staff do not ensure facility has an adequate food supply and Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier , staff do not ensure resident is being assisted with dressing and, the investigation revealed the following: It was alleged the facility does not retain a minimum of 2 day perishbles and 7 day non-perishbles food on hand. LPAs observed the facility to have 2 refridgerators and a kitchen pantry with food available. It was alleged the staff is unable to communicate with residents due to lanaguage barrier, per interviews with 3 staff present and 1 staff via phone LPAs were able to communicate with staff without issue. UnsubstCDSS inspection report, February 24, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260218135245
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in financial distress Insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez for the purpose of delivering findings. LPA met with Staff Chester Gutierrez and explained the purpose of the inspection. Regarding allegation, Facility is in financial distress, the following was revealed: It is alleged the facility is in financial distress due to notice received from the water company indicating the water at the facility would be shut off, staff salaries not being paid, and food delivery being delayed due to bills not paid. Interviews were conducted with five facility residents and three staff. During their interview, three of five residents were unable to confirm or deny the allegation, however, stated the utilities at the facility have been and continue to be operational and food supply is always sufficient in quantity to meet their needs. Two of three residents were unable to confirm or deny allegations or indicate if there has been an interruptionCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260116102240

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThe facility does not have sufficient resources to meet operating costs for care of residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An office visit was scheduled on this day with Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert for the purposes of delivering findings into the above allegations. LPA met with Licensees Maricel Nepomuceno, Allen Medina and Keak Vongphakdy. It was alleged the facility does not have sufficient resources to meet operating costs for care of residents. The investigation determined as follows: The Department conducted an audit of the facility finances based on the Licensee’s 2024 Monthly Operating Statement. Per the review of facility finances, withdrawals exceeded deposits by $8,440.57 in January of 2024 which indicate a net loss. The amounts reported on the LIC 401 could not be directly traced to the bank statements and additional support was not provided by the licensee, therefore, reasonable assurance could not be provided that the facility is generating income to cover operating expenses for January 2024. A review of the facility bills and monthly mortgage payment appeared to show paymentsCDSS inspection report, July 30, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230927113557

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
30
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 450-1699
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Hills Of Rockaway, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.