Jade Guest Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange, Orange County, California — state license #306006062, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Jade Guest Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Orange, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006062, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2710 N. Berkeley St · Orange, Orange County
Phone
(714) 333-5363
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 2 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #2 ONLY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 2, 2026
Occupancy at the December 30, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 26, 2022 to December 30, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 6 documents
Jul 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee modified the admission agreement without department approval.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre made a subsequential visit to deliver findings on complaint investigation. LPA Tirre was greeted and granted entry into the facility by caregiver and explained reason for visit. Administrator Lady Jean Veracruz was present during visit. During the course of investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documents. The investigation conducted revealed the following: Department conducted a record review of residents Admission’s agreements. LPA reviewed Four Resident agreements and LPA observed on two Residents Agreements (residents 3 and 4) have handwritten on pages 10 and 11, “No refund when on hospice care". On R4’s agreement a Responsible party signature is provided on bottom. On R3’s Agreement no responsible parties signature is provided due to R3 being own responsible party. LPA did not observe handwritten “no refund” on Residents 1 and 2’s agreement. Record review revealed that all four residents were under Hospice Carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250121083618
Oct 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly transfer resident's personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced inspection visit to deliver findings for complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPA explained the reason for the visit with Administrator Lady Jean Vera Cruz. During the course of the investigation LPA toured facility, reviewed records, conducted staff interviews, made visual observations, documented photos of belongings and requested pertinent documentation such as Admission agreement, resident personal property and valuables and emergency identification form. During investigation LPA reviewed facility records such as resident admission agreement dated March 17, 2024, which noted under “Belongings Removal” section, “In the event of resident vacating premises, facility will make reasonable efforts to assist resident or responsible person with belongings removal. Facility requires all resident personal belongings to be removed as quickly as responsible party can”. LPA also reviewed Resident’s Personal prthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250914154018
Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at resident in care. Staff did not ensure the facility was free of pests.

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the two allegations listed above as well as to deliver findings to the licensee. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility caregivers after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator Jean Veracruz was notified of the visit and assisted. An initial investigation visit was conducted by licensing staff on January 6, 2025. LPAs accompanied by facility staff toured the facility's physical plant. There were four residents in care, all of which are receiving hospice care. LPAs requested and reviewed resident records for all four residents as well as for a recently deceased resident. Two staff interviews and one resident interview conducted during the visit. During the present visit, LPA conducted an additional tour of the premises and two staff interviews. Additional witness interviews conducted viathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241230110812
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is not ensuring that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for resident in care. Staff do not respond to requests for communication regarding resident in care in a timely manner.

(This is an amended report.) This unannounced investigation inspection by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dwayne Mason Jr. is being conducted to conclude this agency’s investigation in the complaint allegation(s) mentioned above. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted by Leonor Gamolo, Caregiver. LPA met with Administrator Brevet Dao via phone call and explained the nature of the inspection to her and staff. The department received a complaint on 8/14/2024 alleging Licensee is not ensuring that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for resident in care and Staff do not respond to requests for communication regarding resident in care in a timely manner. During the investigation, the department interviewed facility Administrator (AD) and staff. On 8/23/2024 LPA conducted a visit to the facility to initiate investigation into the above allegations. LPA obtained copies of the personnel report and resident census. LPA also obtained electronic copies of all records thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240814101419
Apr 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in injury

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Administrator/Licensee Brevet Dao and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received the complaint on 08/07/2023 and LPA Quiroz conducted the initial 10-day visit on 08/15/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted a follow up visit on 03/27/2024. LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and was unable to interview residents as all were asleep at the time of the visit. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of documents such as admission agreement and physician’s report. Regarding the allegation Facility staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in injury, the investigation revealed the following: Per review of Resident’s 1 (R1) documentation R1 arrived at the facility on 07/26/2023. Based on R1’s physician report dated 07/2023 it was noted that R1 is diagnosed with hypertensive heart disease with heart failurethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230807135753
Mar 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident's change in condition Staff did not reposition bedridden resident Staff did not treat resident with dignity Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed Staff are unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier Staff left resident in bed all day

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Melanie Geller, Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao arrived at the facility shortly after. The Department received the complaint on 01/16/2024 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 01/22/2024. LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and obtained copies of pertinent documents including: physician's reports, admission agreement and medication administration record. LPA Mendivil was unable to interivew residents as they were asleep during visits. Regarding the allegations staff did not seek medical attention for resident's change in condition, staff did not reposition bedridden resident, staff did not treat resident with dignity, staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed, staff are unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier and staff leftthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240116131630
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 0
Type B citations6typical 0
Substantiated complaints14typical 0
Total complaints12typical 0
State visits on file28typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202656020254522024551202344020225512021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 333-5363

Is Jade Guest Home licensed?

Yes — Jade Guest Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange (Orange County): California license #306006062, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Jade Guest Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Jade Guest Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #2 ONLY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5 RESIDENTS.

How much does Jade Guest Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Jade Guest Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Jade Guest Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Jade Guest Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 30, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Jade Guest Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2021 for Jade Guest Home; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 30, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee modified the admission agreement without department approval.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre made a subsequential visit to deliver findings on complaint investigation. LPA Tirre was greeted and granted entry into the facility by caregiver and explained reason for visit. Administrator Lady Jean Veracruz was present during visit. During the course of investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documents. The investigation conducted revealed the following: Department conducted a record review of residents Admission’s agreements. LPA reviewed Four Resident agreements and LPA observed on two Residents Agreements (residents 3 and 4) have handwritten on pages 10 and 11, “No refund when on hospice care". On R4’s agreement a Responsible party signature is provided on bottom. On R3’s Agreement no responsible parties signature is provided due to R3 being own responsible party. LPA did not observe handwritten “no refund” on Residents 1 and 2’s agreement. Record review revealed that all four residents were under Hospice CareCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250121083618
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly transfer resident's personal belongings.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced inspection visit to deliver findings for complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPA explained the reason for the visit with Administrator Lady Jean Vera Cruz. During the course of the investigation LPA toured facility, reviewed records, conducted staff interviews, made visual observations, documented photos of belongings and requested pertinent documentation such as Admission agreement, resident personal property and valuables and emergency identification form. During investigation LPA reviewed facility records such as resident admission agreement dated March 17, 2024, which noted under “Belongings Removal” section, “In the event of resident vacating premises, facility will make reasonable efforts to assist resident or responsible person with belongings removal. Facility requires all resident personal belongings to be removed as quickly as responsible party can”. LPA also reviewed Resident’s Personal prCDSS inspection report, September 16, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250914154018
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yelled at resident in care. Staff did not ensure the facility was free of pests.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the two allegations listed above as well as to deliver findings to the licensee. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility caregivers after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator Jean Veracruz was notified of the visit and assisted. An initial investigation visit was conducted by licensing staff on January 6, 2025. LPAs accompanied by facility staff toured the facility's physical plant. There were four residents in care, all of which are receiving hospice care. LPAs requested and reviewed resident records for all four residents as well as for a recently deceased resident. Two staff interviews and one resident interview conducted during the visit. During the present visit, LPA conducted an additional tour of the premises and two staff interviews. Additional witness interviews conducted viaCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241230110812

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is not ensuring that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for resident in care. Staff do not respond to requests for communication regarding resident in care in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
(This is an amended report.) This unannounced investigation inspection by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dwayne Mason Jr. is being conducted to conclude this agency’s investigation in the complaint allegation(s) mentioned above. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted by Leonor Gamolo, Caregiver. LPA met with Administrator Brevet Dao via phone call and explained the nature of the inspection to her and staff. The department received a complaint on 8/14/2024 alleging Licensee is not ensuring that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for resident in care and Staff do not respond to requests for communication regarding resident in care in a timely manner. During the investigation, the department interviewed facility Administrator (AD) and staff. On 8/23/2024 LPA conducted a visit to the facility to initiate investigation into the above allegations. LPA obtained copies of the personnel report and resident census. LPA also obtained electronic copies of all records theCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240814101419
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Administrator/Licensee Brevet Dao and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received the complaint on 08/07/2023 and LPA Quiroz conducted the initial 10-day visit on 08/15/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted a follow up visit on 03/27/2024. LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and was unable to interview residents as all were asleep at the time of the visit. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of documents such as admission agreement and physician’s report. Regarding the allegation Facility staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in injury, the investigation revealed the following: Per review of Resident’s 1 (R1) documentation R1 arrived at the facility on 07/26/2023. Based on R1’s physician report dated 07/2023 it was noted that R1 is diagnosed with hypertensive heart disease with heart failureCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230807135753
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for resident's change in condition Staff did not reposition bedridden resident Staff did not treat resident with dignity Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed Staff are unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier Staff left resident in bed all day
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Melanie Geller, Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao arrived at the facility shortly after. The Department received the complaint on 01/16/2024 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 01/22/2024. LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and obtained copies of pertinent documents including: physician's reports, admission agreement and medication administration record. LPA Mendivil was unable to interivew residents as they were asleep during visits. Regarding the allegations staff did not seek medical attention for resident's change in condition, staff did not reposition bedridden resident, staff did not treat resident with dignity, staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed, staff are unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier and staff leftCDSS inspection report, March 5, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240116131630

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff did not ensure that wheelchair bound resident has safe access to the restroom.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz made an unannounced complaint visit to address the allegation listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Teresa Del Pilar and explained the reason for the visit. Caregiver DePilar called Administrator (AD) Brevet Dao. LPA Quiroz discussed purpose of today's visit with AD Dao via telephone. Regarding the allegation: "Facility staff did not ensure that wheelchair bound resident has safe access to the restroom," the investigation revealed the following: During today's visit, LPA Quiroz observed and inspected two of two bathrooms in the facility. During today's visit, Caregiver Teresa Del Pilar demonstrated how a large size wheel chair is able to fit in and out of bathroom near facility entrance. Interviews conducted with five of five interviewees revealed that they are aware that front bathroom near facility entrance accomodates easily wheelchair access availability. CONTINUED ON NEXT PACDSS inspection report, May 16, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230509084157
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff lack emergency disaster training Facility does not have emergency oxygen An uncleared individual is living in facility Facility failed to maintain temperature within regulatory requirements
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit in order to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Teresa De Pilar and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 10/26/2022 and conducted the initial visit on 10/31/2022. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of pertinent documents including but not limited to: staffing documents, medication records and facility roster. In regards to the allegations facility staff lack emergency disaster training, facility does not have emergency oxygen, and An uncleared individual is living in facility, the investigation revealed the following: UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 25, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221026135817
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not accompany resident to a medical appointment Facility has insects. Facility did not seek medical treatment for resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to discuss the complaint allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Ben Briones Mr. Briones informed LPA that R1 did not reside at this facility. He resided at 2702 Berkeley St. which is the sister facility in front named Iris Guest Home. The homes share the same property and structure but have two different addresses. Based upon interview with Mr. Briones these allegations are unfounded at this facility, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. R1 never lived at this facility. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to Ben Briones. Allegations will be investigated at Iris Guest Home #306005722. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 27, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230117133658
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has no heat
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced complaint visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Teresa Del Pilar and explained the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint on 01/17/2023. LPA Mendivil visited facility on 01/18/2023 . Regarding the allegation the facility has no heat,the investigation revealed the following: LPA Mendivil observed the thermostat at 77 degrees fahrenheit on 01/18/2023 during the initial 10 day visit. During the complaint delivering visit the thermostat read at 78 degrees fahrenheit. Interviews with staff and residents indicate the heater is on daily. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230117164826

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
14
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
12
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 333-5363
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Jade Guest Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.