Small home · Licensed for 6 · Orange
Iris Guest Home
2702 N Berkely St, Orange, CA 92865Licensed since 2020
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 27, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 5 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 27, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 27, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 27, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Iris Guest Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,200a month to start
Likely $4,300–$6,450
From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,200likely a month
Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,300–$6,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$6,600
- $5,200
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,750
- $7,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes16 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,400 to $8,000
16 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,950–$6,000.
- South Home CareAnaheim · 0.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- The Orange ManorOrange · 1.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Addie's Cottage Senior LivingAnaheim · 1.3 mi · Small home$5,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- CaringbridgeAnaheim · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Nohl Ranch Elederly CareOrange · 1.5 mi · Small home$3,400Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A.C.E. Advanced Care for ElderlyAnaheim · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Flower ManorAnaheim · 1.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Summit View Assisted LivingOrange · 2.0 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- A Touch of Care at MarywoodOrange · 2.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Lakeview Elderly CareAnaheim · 2.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Amparo Elder Care HomeOrange · 2.4 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Flowers Family Care 2Orange · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Park GardensVilla Park · 2.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cheerful Heart Home VVilla Park · 2.8 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunshine Retirement HomeVilla Park · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Versa-Care Home IPlacentia · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
2702 N Berkely St, Orange, CA 92865Address from the public record · October 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Orange County - AnaheimHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 27, 2026 · License #306005722 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 21 of 54 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 4 “Substantiated”, 4 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.
202610 state visits · 10 documents
Aug 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sam Haddadin conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to Iris Guest Home on 08/07/2026 to follow up on deficiencies cited on 08/04/2026. LPA was greeted by Administrator (AD) Jean Veracruz, granted entry into the facility, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and conducted a health and safety check, including all residents’ bedrooms. LPA also conducted a medication audit for all four current residents in care. LPA verified that the deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation section 87309(a), Storage Space, which states, “Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms, and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents shall be stored where inaccessible to residents,” has been cleared. LPA observed that the cabinet containing chemicals, sharps, and cleaning supplies was secured and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA verified that the deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation section 87555(b)(26), General Food Service Requirements, which states, “Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises,” has been cleared. LPA observed that the facility maintained a sufficient two-day supply of perishable food to meet the needs of the residents in care. Based on observations made during today’s visit, all deficiencies cited on 08/04/2026 have been cleared, and no deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Jean Veracruz, and a copy of this report was provided at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026
Aug 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sam Haddadin conducted a Case Management visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a health and safety check. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Administrator (AD) Jean Veracruz, who granted entry into the facility. During the health and safety check, LPA observed a cabinet containing chemicals, sharps, and cleaning supplies that was unlocked and accessible to residents in care. AD acknowledged the cabinet was not secured. This observation does not comply with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 87309(a), Storage Space, which requires disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents to be stored where they are inaccessible. LPA also inspected the facility’s food supply and observed that the facility did not maintain a minimum two-day supply of perishable food for the residents in care. AD acknowledged that the available perishable food supply was insufficient. This observation does not comply with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 87555(b)(26), General Food Service Requirements, which requires facilities to maintain a minimum one-week supply of nonperishable food and a minimum two-day supply of perishable food on the premises. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and operational. Hot water temperatures were measured between 111.5 and 113.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Deficiencies are being cited during today’s visit pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, along with appeal rights, was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 7, 2026
87309(a)Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms, and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents shall be stored where inaccessible to residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the Licensee failed to ensure that chemicals, sharps, and cleaning supplies were inaccessible to residents. During the visit, LPA observed an unlocked cabinet containing chemicals, sharps, and cleaning supplies. The cabinet was accessible to residents in care. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Plan of correction: The Administrator secured the cabinet containing the chemicals, sharps, and cleaning supplies during the visit. The Licensee agreed to conduct staff training regarding the proper storage of hazardous items and submit proof of training to the Licensing office by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 7, 2026
87555(b)(26) General Food Service Requirements Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the Licensee failed to maintain a minimum two-day supply of perishable food on the premises. During the visit, LPA inspected the facility’s food supply and observed that there was not enough perishable food to meet the needs of the residents in care for a minimum of two days. The Administrator acknowledged that the facility’s perishable food supply was insufficient. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal-rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to purchase sufficient perishable food to maintain a minimum two-day supply and submit photographs and purchase receipts to the LPA by the POC due date.
Jul 31, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sam Haddadin conducted a Case Management visit to the facility for the purpose of completing a health and safety check. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Administrator (AD) Jean Veracruz, who granted entry into the facility and was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA observed four residents in care. All residents were asleep at the time of the visit. LPA, accompanied by facility staff, toured the interior of the facility and reviewed resident medications and records. No discrepancies were identified. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and operational. Hot water temperatures were measured between 111.5 and 113.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies were secured in a locked cabinet under the kitchen sink, and knives and other sharp objects were secured in the caregiver’s room. The facility maintained an adequate food supply consisting of at least a two-day supply of perishable food and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food. The facility had operating electricity, gas, and water services. Kitchen appliances were checked and observed to be operational and in good working condition. The required “See Something, Say Something” poster (PUB 475) was posted in the hallway. The fireplace in the living room was equipped with a protective screen. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies are being cited.An exit interview was conducted with AD Jean Veracruz, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2026
Jul 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sam Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the required annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Administrator (AD) Jean Veracruz, who granted entry into the facility. The facility is licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) may be bedridden. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for five (5) residents. At the time of today’s visit, there were three (3) residents receiving hospice services. The facility is a single-story residence with a detached garage. The facility consists of four bedrooms, including three shared resident bedrooms and one staff bedroom, and two full bathrooms. During the inspection, LPA toured the interior and exterior areas of the facility. All bathrooms were observed to be clean, sanitary, and operational. Hot water was tested and measured between 109.9 degrees Fahrenheit and 112.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The kitchen was observed to be clean and organized, and the facility had an adequate food supply, including at least a two-day supply of perishable food and a seven-day supply of non-perishable food. Knives and cleaning supplies were secured in a locked cabinet located in the hallway and were inaccessible to residents in care. All kitchen appliances were observed to be operational and in working condition. The fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be operational. The first aid kit contained the required supplies. Medication was observed to be locked and secured in a cabinet located in the hallway. LPA inspected the detached garage and observed that it was being used for storage. Residents’ bedrooms were inspected and contained the required furnishings. The backyard included a covered patio with a seating area for residents. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. The exit gate was operational, and no hazards or obstructions were observed in the backyard. A review of resident files revealed no discrepancies. Staff files were also reviewed and found to be complete, with the required documentation maintained in each file. Based on observations made during today’s inspection, no deficiencies are being cited pursuant to Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to AD Jean Veracruz at the conclusion of the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026
Jul 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in an aggressive manner Staff yell at resident Staff do not safeguard resident’s personal belongings Staff mishandle resident's P&I funds
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Jean Veracruz, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegations. The investigation into the allegations that staff handled resident in an aggressive manner, staff yell at resident, staff do not safeguard resident’s personal belongings, and staff mishandle resident's P&I funds revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster and staff roster. CONTINUED Unfounded Regarding the allegation that staff handled resident in an aggressive manner: it was alleged that staff hit residents. LPA inspected the facility, conducted health and safety checks on residents, and observed no health and safety issues. Based on observations, documents, and an interview with AD, the events alleged did not occur at this facility. These events will be investigated under the correct facility. Regarding the allegation that staff yell at resident: it was alleged that staff yell at, harass, and speak badly about residents. Based on the information obtained, the events alleged did not occur at this facility. These events will be investigated under the correct facility. Regarding the allegation that staff do not safeguard resident’s personal belongings: it was alleged that staff steal residents’ property and food. Based on the information obtained, the events alleged did not occur at this facility. These events will be investigated under the correct facility. Regarding the allegation that staff mishandle resident's P&I funds: it was alleged that staff use residents’ money for their own use. Based on the information obtained, the events alleged did not occur at this facility. These events will be investigated under the correct facility. The Department has investigated the above allegations and found them to be Unfounded, meaning the allegations were false, could not have happened, or are without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260624103416
Jun 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sam Haddadin conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to follow up on deficiencies cited on 06/26/2026. LPA was greeted by Administrator (AD) Jean Veracruz, granted entry into the facility, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and conducted a health and safety check, including all residents’ bedrooms. LPA also conducted a medication audit for all four current residents in care. LPA verified that the deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation section 87303(a), Maintenance and Operation, which states, “The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times,” has been cleared. The broken closet door located directly behind the resident’s head was repaired. LPA verified that the deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation section 87303(e)(6), Maintenance and Operation, which states, “Toilet, handwashing and bathing facilities shall be maintained in operating condition,” has been cleared. Bathroom 1 now has a working sink and running hot water. LPA verified that the deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation section 87309(a), Storage Space and Access, which states, “The licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions, knives, tools, sharp objects, and other similar items which could pose a danger to residents are in locked storage,” has been cleared. LPA observed that all knives, sharps, and cleaning supplies are now secured and locked in the laundry room. Based on today’s visit, all deficiencies cited on 06/26/2026 have been cleared. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Jean Veracruz, and a copy of this report was provided at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2026
Jun 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sam Haddadin conducted a Case Management visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a health and safety check. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by Administrator (AD) Jean Veracruz, who granted entry into the facility. During the visit, LPA observed four residents in care. LPA toured the residents’ bedrooms and observed that the bedrooms contained the required furnishings and accommodations. However, Bedroom 1 had a broken closet door located directly behind the resident’s head area, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to the resident in care. LPA also observed that Bathroom 1 had a nonworking sink and no running hot water, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. LPA checked the hot water temperature in Bathroom 2, which measured 116.9 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection of the kitchen, LPA observed knives and sharps unsecured under the kitchen sink, along with cleaning supplies, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. Deficiencies are being cited during today’s visit per Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, along with appeal rights, was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 29, 2026
87303(a), Maintenance and Operation, states: “The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times.” This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPA observed Bedroom 1 had a broken closet door located directly behind the resident’s head area. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026
Plan of correction: Plan of Correction: The Licensee/Administrator shall repair or remove the broken closet door to ensure the resident’s bedroom is maintained in safe and good repair. Proof of correction, including photos and/or repair invoice, shall be submitted to LPA by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC87303(e)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 29, 2026
87303(e)(6), Maintenance and Operation, states: “Toilet, handwashing and bathing facilities shall be maintained in operating condition.” This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPA observed Bathroom 1 had a nonworking sink and no running hot water. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator shall ensure Bathroom 1 sink is repaired and maintained in operating condition, and that hot water is available to residents. The Licensee/Administrator shall submit proof of correction, including photos, repair invoice, and a hot water temperature log, to LPA by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 22, 2026
87309(a), Storage Space and Access,"the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions knives,tools, sharp objects, and other similar items which could pose a danger to residents are in locked storage" This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPA observed knives and sharps unsecured under the kitchen sink, along with cleaning supplies. The items were accessible to residents in care and posed an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator shall immediately remove and secure all knives, sharps, cleaning supplies, disinfectants, and other hazardous items in locked storage. The Licensee/Administrator shall conduct staff training regarding proper storage of hazardous items and submit proof of correction, including photos and staff training documentation, to LPA by the POC due date.
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff sexually abused resident while in care Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff hit resident with objects Facility is malodorous Facility floors are dirty
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez for the purpose of delivering findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Lady Jean Vera Cruz and explained the purpose of the inspection. On April 14, 2026, LPA toured the facility and conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA was unable to review records of former residents and staff as those were no longer available. Regarding allegations, Staff sexually abused resident while in care and Staff handled resident in a rough manner, the following was revealed: Complaint alleges Staff 1 (S1) sexually abused and handled Resident 1 (R1) in a rough manner. During the course of the investigation, LPA attempted to interview R1, however, R1 had not resided at the facility since July 2022, and their contact information was no longer available. LPA also attempted to interview S1, however, S1 retired in 2022 and their contact information was no longer available. (Cont. LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated Interviews were conducted with three current facility residents (R2-R4), who were admitted after both R1 and S1 left the facility. All denied being sexually abused or handled in rough manner and denied having any knowledge of any other resident being sexually abused or handled in a rough manner. During interview, Staff 2 (S2) stated they were employed at the facility after R1 and S1 had left the facility and were not personally acquainted with them. S2 denied having any knowledge of S1 sexually abusing or handling R1 in a rough manner. S2 denied personally sexually abusing or handling a current or former resident in a rough manner or having any knowledge of any current or former staff sexually abusing or handling a current or former resident in a rough manner. During interview, Staff 3 (S3) stated they were acquainted with S1 and had previously worked with them. S3, however, stated they were not acquainted with R1, as they were not working at the facility at the time that R1 was a resident. S3 denied having any knowledge of S1 sexually abusing or handling R1 in a rough manner. S3 denied personally sexually abusing or handling a current or former resident in a rough manner or having any knowledge of any current or former staff sexually abusing a current or former resident. Regarding allegation, Staff hit resident with objects, the following was revealed: Complaint alleges S1 hit R1 on the head twice with a soiled diaper and once with a bag of popcorn. LPA was unable to interview R1 as they have not resided at the facility since July 2022, and contact information for them was no longer available. LPA was also unable to interview S1, as they retired in 2022 and their contact information was no longer available. All current facility residents were admitted after both R1 and S1 left the facility. Three of three residents interviewed denied being hit with objects or having any knowledge of any other residents being hit with objects. During interview, S2 stated they were employed at the facility after R1 and S1 had left the facility and were not personally acquainted with them. S2 denied having any knowledge of S1 hitting R1 with objects and denied personally hitting a current or former resident with objects or having any knowledge of any current or former staff hitting a current or former resident with objects. During interview, Staff 3 (S3) stated they were acquainted with S1 and had previously worked with them. S3, however, stated they were not acquainted with R1, as they were not working at the facility at the time that R1 was a resident. S3 denied having any knowledge of S1 hitting R1 with objects and denied personally hitting a current or former resident with objects or having any knowledge of any current or former staff hitting a current or former resident with objects. Regarding allegations, Facility is malodorous and Facility floors are dirty, the following was revealed: Complaint alleges facility smelled of urine and the floors were sticky. (Cont. LIC9099-C) Three of three residents interviewed denied the facility being malodorous or the floors being sticky. During interview, Staff 2 (S2) stated they heard that prior to their employment, the facility had smelled of urine, and the floors had been dirty, however, stated they never observed the floors were dirty or the facility to smell of urine and stated they maintain the facility floor clean and odor free. During interview, S3 denied the facility smelling of urine or the facility floors being dirty. Per S3, the facility used to smell of “chlorine” and floor cleanliness has been and continues to be maintained. During the course of the investigation, LPA noted the facility was odorless and the tile flooring was free of any stickiness, smearing, smudging, or discoloration. Based on information gathered, the department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations, “Staff sexually abused a resident while in care, Staff handled a resident in a rough manner, Staff hit a resident with objects, Facility is malodorous, and Facility floors are dirty”. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided at the end of the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 22-AS-20220602115903
Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Case Management inspection in conjunction with investigation into complaint number 22-AS-20220602115903. LPA met with Administrator Jean Vera Cruz and Staff Norby Banggalat and explained the purpose of the inspection. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted record review for five of five resident files and observed three of five files did not include a physician report, and five of five files were observed to have double sided admission agreements. Based on observations made during this inspection, two deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 15, 2026
(a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a licensed medical professional... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in three of five resident files, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
Plan of correction: AD stated a medical assessment for the three residents will be obtained a copy provided to LPA via email by POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87507(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 28, 2026
(a) The licensee shall complete an individual written admission agreement... (1) The text of the admission agreement... shall be: (A) Printed... on plain white paper. The print shall appear on one side of the paper only. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in five of five admission agreements, which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
Plan of correction: AD stated admission agreements will be re-printed to appear on one side of the paper only and a copy will be provided to LPA via email. AD stated original agreements will be retained in residents' files.
Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure resident's records were complete
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to follow up on complaint investigation. LPA Tirre was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff and explained reason for visit. LPA Tirre met with Administrator Lady Jean Veracruz. During the course of investigation, LPA toured facility, reviewed documents, conducted interviews and requested pertinent documentation such as Resident 1’s records including Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal, Needs and Service plan. The investigation conducted revealed the following: On January 27, 2026 the department received a complaint alleging Facility staff did not ensure resident's records were complete. Record review revealed that R1 had the following documents: Emergency ID Information, Preplacement Appraisal, and Resident Appraisal were all incomplete and not signed. Per record review CONTINUED ON 9099C Substantiated LPA did not observe Resident 1 to have an Admission Agreement completed or signed in facility file. Record review revealed that resident 1 was admitted to facility on December 10, 2025 and left on January 6, 2026. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that Resident 1 was at facility for a month and left to go back home to be with family. Interview with witness also revealed that R1 was at facility for a month. Interview with witness stated that R1 believes they signed documents but were not explained of what they signed. An interview with R1 was not conducted due to R1 no longer at facility and no contact info available. Therefore based on preponderance of evidence information gathered is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Lady Jean Vera Cruz and a copy of this report, along with confidential names list and appeal rights was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260127120316
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 25, 2026
Resident Records (a) Licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for ea resident in facility or in central administrative location readily available to facility staff and licensing agency staff. Based on record review this requirement was not met as evidenced by facility failed to ensure resident records were complete. R1 is missing signatures on appraisals and missing Admission agreement.R1 is no longer at facility as of 1/6/26.This poses a potential health & safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026
Plan of correction: As POC, Licensee to review and update Resident files with missing signatures. Licensee to do an inservice training including themselves and staff acknowledging understanding of Regulation 87506 Resident Records & provide signed copy to Department by COB due date 2/25/26
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On July 15, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA Tirre was greeted by staff and granted entry after stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator (Ad) Lady Jean Veracruz was present to assist with the facility inspection on today's date. The facility is licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory residents of which one (1) may be bedridden with approved hospice waiver for five residents. Currently, there are three (3) Hospice residents present during today’s visit. This is a single story with detached garage facility. The facility has four bedrooms, ( three shared resident rooms and one staff room) and two full bathrooms. At around 11:30AM, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant accompanied by Administrator Lady Jean Veracruz, and the following was observed: There are no bodies of water on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in operational condition, lighting was provided, and storage for the client's personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were available during the visit. Bathrooms were operational with water temperature measured at 113.1 degrees F. LPA observed the facility to be furnished at the time of the visit. Storage areas for cleaning supplies and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected, and sufficient perishable and non-perishable food was maintained. Facility has one fire extinguisher which was charged. A review of the Medication Records Administration (MAR) was conducted for three residents and LPA observed the records are in compliance. CONT ON 809C During the visit, LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents. LPA observed the facility has a supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA observed First Aid Kit was maintained. A working phone was operational. The last fire drill was conducted on June 6, 2025. The facility had operational smoke and carbon monoxide in bedrooms and common areas. The facility has current liability insurance on file effective 6/20/2025 -6/20/2026. A review of five residents (R1-R5) service files revealed to be complete. The facility has the current administrator's certification on file for Lady Jean Veracruz # 6070564740 - Expiration 06/01/2026. Staff present during visit had proper background clearance. Based on the observations made during today's visit, a deficiency is being cited as per the Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 2 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to Administrator VeraCruz.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025
20245 state visits · 7 documents
Oct 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and William Vanegas conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to follow up on deficiencies cited on 09/26/2024. LPA's were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:10PM LPA's toured the facility and observed the following: Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87608(a)(3) pertaining to postural supports has been cleared. LPA's observed physicians order for bed rails for all resident's noted in 809. Licensee has complied with the POC. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(a) pertaining to maintenance and operation has been cleared. LPA's observed all noted items in 809 to be repaired. Licensee has complied with the POC. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(e)(2) pertaining to water temperature has been cleared. LPA's tested water temperature to be 109.2 F degrees. Licensee has complied with the POC. Licensee addressed all items on advisory note issued on 09/26/2024. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2024
Sep 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit to Iris Guest Home. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the Annual Required inspection. LPA was allowed entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory residents of which 1 may be bedridden. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 5 residents and the home currently has 4 residents on hospice. Administrator/ Licensee Brevet Dao arrived during the visit. Administrator Jean Veracruz has an administrator certificate valid until 06/01/2026. LPA Lyman along with Caregiver Norbi Banggalat toured the facility at 8:25 AM. LPA toured the physical plant, checked food service, first aid kit and reviewed records. The home consists of three resident bedrooms, 2 common restrooms, one staff room, living room, dining room, and kitchen. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. LPA observed a closet threshold in disrepair in room #3. Resident restrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure and shower was free of mold/mildew. Water temperature measured 103.1 degrees F in one common restroom. At 8:40 AM, LPA is unable to measure water temperature in second common restroom as the sink is overflowing with water. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked at time of visit. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. Auditory exit alarms are turned off during today's visit. First aid kit had all the elements including thermometer, tweezers and scissors as well as a first aid manual. LPA observed toxins are secured during today's visit. Kitchen was inspected. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. LPA tested smoke detectors during today's visit. Smoke detectors in room #1 and the hallway are non-operational. Fire extinguisher is fully charged. Kitchen appliances are operational during today's visit. LPA toured the outside grounds and there is ample seating for residents. At 8:45, LPA observed back exit gate does not easily open. LPA observed ample emergency food and water supply. LPA reviewed the emergency disaster plan and plan is thorough and complete. CONT ON LIC809-C DATED 09/26/2024. Facility provided documentation of last fire drill conducted on 07/06/2024. Facility provides activities in the form of exercise, and karaoke. At 9:30 AM, LPA reviewed six resident files and four staff files. Resident files contained required documents including admission agreements, physician reports and resident appraisals. Resident 1 (R1) does not have a physician order on file for half bed rails. Staff files reviewed contained required documentation of medical clearance/ TB, CPR training and criminal record clearance as well as required training. At 10:15 AM, LPA reviewed medication storage and administration. Medications are stored in a locked closet. Medications are being administered per physician order. Based on the observations made during today's visit, the following violations are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as appeal rights were discussed and provided with facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -Resident's hygiene needs are not being met. -Resident left in soiled diaper/linens for an extended period of time. -Staff does not meet resident's needs.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings regarding the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver 1 (CG1) LPA Quiroz called and spoke to Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Brevet Dao and discussed purpose of the visit. The department received a complaint on 12/29/2020. LPA Shobhana Frank conducted the initial 10 day visit on 01/06/2021 and follow up visit on 9/9/2021. During the course of the investigation LPA Quiroz conducted a complaint follow up visit and interviewed staff and residents. LPA Quiroz obtained copies of resident records but not limited to physician reports, needs and services and identification forms. Regarding the allegations that "Resident's hygiene needs are not being met," "Resident left in soiled diaper/linens for an extended period of time" and "Staff does not meet resident's needs," the investigation revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, six of eight interviewees corroborated with three of three allegations listed above. CONTINUED ON NEXT LIC 9099-C PAGE... Substantiated CONTINUED...LPA Quiroz was not able to interview Resident 1 (R1), due to R1 passing away. During inspection visit conducted on 1/22/2024, on or about 11:40am LPA Quiroz observed Resident 3 (R3) to be unkept with maladorous scent noted and unkept, long toe nails and finger nails. This was verified with Caregiver 1. Witness indicated "The Administrator never comes and they never listen about the resident's needs. They ignore our needs." On or about 11:58am, LPA Quiroz observed Resident 5 (R5) to have soiled diaper. Witness indicated alerting staff of soiled diaper and request to change diaper and that request was ignored. Witness stated, "Last changed long time ago, and staff never returned after request was made." Therefore, based on evidence through records reviewed and interviews conducted the allegations that "Resident's hygiene needs are not being met," "Resident left in soiled diaper/linens for an extended period of time," and "Staff does not meet resident's needs" are determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegations are valid and that a violation has occurred. (SEE LIC 9099-D) The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. Civil penalties area assessed due to repeated violations within 12 months. (SEE CIVIL PENALTY-LIC 421IM) An exit interview was conducted with (L/AD) Brevet Dao via telephone and with CG1 at the facility, and a copy of this report, Appeal rights, LIC 9099-D page, LIC 421 IM and LIC 811- Confidential names were provided at exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20201229142426
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 22, 2024
Basic Services-87464(d): (a)The services provided by the facility shall be conducted so as to continue and promote, to the extent possible, independence and self-direction for all persons accepted for care. ..This requirement was not CONT met as evidenced by: On 1/22/2024, on or about 11:40am LPA Quiroz observed Resident 3 (R3) to be unkept with maladorous scent noted and unkept, long toe nails and finger nails. This was verified with Caregiver 1. Witness indicated "The Administrator never CONTINUED...the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024
Plan of correction: L/AD Dao will read and understand CCR 87464, provide inservice training to staff identified on LIC 500 and update needs and services plans for all residents residing at the facility by POC due date of 5/22/2024.(CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED) comes and they never listen about the resident's needs. They ignore our needs." This poses a potential risk to residents in care.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 22, 2024
87625 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence.CONT This requirement was not met as evidenced by:On 1/22/24 or about 11:58am, LPA Quiroz observed Resident 5 (R5) to have soiled diaper. Witness indicated alerting staff of soiled diaper and request to change diaper and that request was ignored. CONTINUED...the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024
Plan of correction: L/AD Dao will read and understand CCR 87625, provide inservice training to staff identified on LIC 500 and develop log for routinely incontinence care by POC due date of 5/22/2024.(CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED) Witness stated, "Last changed long time ago, and staff never returned after request was made." This poses a potential risk to residents in care (CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED)
May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint control #22-AS-20201229142426. LPA Quiroz was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver 1 (CG1). LPA Quiroz called and spoke to Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Brevet Dao via telephone and explained the reason for the visit. During today's visit while conducting inspection tour of the facility, on or about 2:50pm, LPA Quiroz observed recording monitor in Resident's 1 bedroom. On or about 3:07pm, LPA Quiroz observed monitor in bedroom area displaying picture and recording of Resident 1. This was verified with CG1 who indicated "Yeah, the AD put it there so we can see what R1 is doing when we're busy out here in the living-room and at night we put it in the bedroom so we can see the resident at all times." LPA Quiroz did not observe sign of recording in progress taking place in R1s bedroom. On or about 3:10pm, LPA Quiroz observed Resident's 2 family in living room area where R1's recording was being displayed. The facility is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with CG1 and L/AD Brevet Dao via telephone and a copy of this report, appeal rights and LIC 811- Confidential names were provided at exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 15, 2024
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature...CONTINUED This requirement is not met as evidenced by:During today's visit while conducting inspection tour of the facility, on or about 2:50pm, LPA Quiroz observed recording monitor in Resident's 1 bedroom. On or about 3:07pm, LPA Quiroz observed monitor in bedroom area displaying CONTINUEDthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024
Plan of correction: Recording camera removed during today's visit. L/AD Dao and Caregivers agreed to not use recording devices in residnent's bedroom areas. L/AD agreed to read and submit proog of understanding for CCR 87468.1 by POC due date of 5/22/024. picture and recording of Resident 1. This was verified with CG1 who indicated "Yeah, the AD put it there so we can see what R1 is doing when we're busy out here in the living-room and at night we put it in the bedroom so we can see the resident at all times." This poses a potential risk to residents in care.
Apr 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: facility tried to prevent resident from being taken to the hospital by family facility staff decided resident should be on hospice facility did not keep accurate resident records
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by XX and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 06/12/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 06/15/2023. LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents and obtained copies of pertinent documents such as physician report, admission agreement and hospice documentation. Regarding the allegation facility tried to prevent resident from being taken to the hospital by family, facility staff decided resident should be on hospice and facility did not keep accurate resident records, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) arrived at the facility on 03/09/2023 and their admission agreement was signed on 03/16/2023 by a responsible party. Substantiated Per R1’s physician report dated 01/12/2023 R1 was diagnosed with Cerebral vascular accident and a secondary diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. R1 was not noted to have any mild cognitive impairment or dementia and is noted to be able to communicate needs and follow directions. It was reported on 05/08/2023 R1 was taken to the hospital due to chronic pain and returned home on 05/06/2023 with diagnosis of abnormal suputum. On 06/05/2023 it was reported on an Unusual Incident/Injury report dated 06/07/2023 that on 06/05/2023 R1’s son took them to the hospital due to complaints of R1 being lethargic and R1 was admitted to the hospital for further evaluation. Based on witness interviews R1 was diagnosed with pneumonia. It was reported by 2 witnesses that facility staff told family to not take R1 to the hospital as R1 was on hospice, R1’s family decided to take him to the hospital anyway. Based on interviews with 2 out of 2 staff indicate they did notify family that R1 was on hospice and by taking the resident to the hospital it would discontinue their hospice. Per review of hospice agreement R1 signed the documentation to enroll in Helius Hospice on 03/26/2023, based on the evaluation listed on the hospice documentation it stated that R1 had less than 6 months, which was not reflected in the physician’s report dated 01/12/2023. It was reported by witnesses that R1 was signed up for hospice by facility representative and not by the resident or resident’s responsible party. Licensee/Administrator Brevet Dao denies this allegation. Based on review of documentation from hospice Helius Hospice, LPA observed the documents to be incomplete and did not contain a plan of care. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed and observation the allegations facility tried to prevent resident from being taken to the hospital by family, facility staff decided resident should be on hospice and facility did not keep accurate resident records the allegations are determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. Based on interviews with 2 out of 5 residents, they indicated R1 was moved to his wheelchair to go outside and smoke cigarettes and was moved into the living to watch TV. Per review of R1’s physician report R1 has a history of skin breakdown, but 2 out of 2 staff deny seeing pressure injuries. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed and interviews the allegations staff did not notify resident’s family of change in resident’s condition and facility staff did not prevent resident from sustaining pressure injuries are determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230613154512
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2024
(g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4). This requirement was not met as evidence facility told R1's family that he was on hospice and would be discontinued. This poses an immediate health and safety risks to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator Brevet agreed to conduct an inservice training for 911 procedures and to provide proof by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87633(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2024
(a) The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain residents who have been diagnosed as terminally ill by his or her physician..., to reside in the facility and receive hospice services from a hospice agency in the facility when all of the following conditions are met: (3) Hospice agency services are contracted for by each terminally ill resident.. not by the licensee on behalf of a resident or prospective resident...This requirement was not met as evidence by Licensee signed up resident for hospice. This poses an immediate risk to persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agreed to review hospice regulations and provide proof that it was understood by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87633(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2024
(a) The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain residents who have been diagnosed as terminally ill by his or her physician..., to reside in the facility and receive hospice services from a hospice agency in the facility when all of the following conditions are met: (4) A written hospice care plan which specifies the care, services, and necessary medical intervention related to the terminal illness as necessary to supplement the care and supervision provided by the facility is developed for each terminally ill resident.. This requirement was not met as documents were not complete.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee to review hospice regulations and provide proof to LPA by POC due date.
Apr 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that a comfortable temperature is maintained in rooms that residents occupy. Facility does not meet resident's dietary needs
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Adminstrator/Licensee Brevet Dao and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 09/02/2022 and the Department conducted the initial 10 day visit on 09/08/2022. Regarding the allegations licensee does not ensure that a comfortable temperature is maintained in rooms that residents occupy, and facility does not meet resident’s dietary needs, the investigation revealed the following: During the visit on 10/31/2022 LPA Mendivil interviewed residents present at that time indicated the facility will provide fans if the weather outside is warm. LPA Mendivil visited the facility on 05/19/2023, 5/25/2023,06/15/2023 , 07/11/2023 and 8/15/2023 and the facility was within regulatory temperatures and LPA Mendivil observed the air conditioning to be operational and on, on multiple occasions. Unsubstantiated During the visit on 10/31/2022 LPA Mendivil interviewed residents present at that time indicated the facility will provide fans if the weather outside is warm. LPA Mendivil visited the facility on 05/19/2023, 5/25/2023,06/15/2023 , 07/11/2023 and 8/15/2023 and the facility was within regulatory temperatures and LPA Mendivil observed the air conditioning to be operational and on, on multiple occasions. Based on observations by LPA Mendivil observed the refrigerator was stocked with eggs, bread, ham, and chicken. LPA Mendivil observed a sample menu on the refrigerator. Based on interviews with Administrator Brevet Dao the menu is not always followed, and it is modified. Administrator stated they try to accommodate all resident's dietary restrictions with are mostly low sodium and low carbohydrate meals. Interviews with staff indicate that groceries are purchased every 5 days. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence through interviews and observations the allegations that licensee does not ensure that a comfortable temperature is maintained in rooms that residents occupy and facility does not meet resident’s dietary needs are determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Therefore based on interviews the allegation that staff yells are residents is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. Civil Penalty assessed based on repeat violation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20220902153422
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2024
(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidence by: 2 out of 6 residents stated that S1 yells. This poses a potential risk to persons safety in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee to provide proof of all staff training for personal rights to LPA by due date. S1 is no longer working at the facility.
Mar 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow doctor's dietary orders for resident in care
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced to deliver findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into facility by Gemma Wanawan, Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was available by phone. The Department received a complaint on 07/07/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 07/11/2023. During the visit LPA obtained copies of sample menus and interviewed residents and staff. Regarding the allegation Staff did not follow doctor's dietary orders for resident in care, the investigation revealed the following: Based on interviews with 1 out of 2 staff indicated they were unaware that any of the residents had a prescribed modified diet. Interviews with 2 out of 4 residents indicated they do not have a specific diet, the 2 other residents would not answer LPA Mendivil's questions. Substantiated Per review of resident’s files Resident 1 (R1) does have a prescribed diet which was provided to the facility in June/July of 2023. Based on interviews with 2 witnesses the meals provided to R1 did not contain the food groups in the prescribed diet. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed and interviews the allegations that staff did not follow doctor’s dietary orders for resident in care is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230707154552
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(7) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 8, 2024
(b) The following food service requirements shall apply:(7) Modified diets prescribed by a resident's physician as a medical necessity shall be provided. This requirement was not met as evidence by 1 out of 2 staff was not aware of Resident 1's prescribed diet. This poses a potential health risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to provide in service to staff on renal diets and other possible diets that residents may have. Licensee agreed to keep a log of groceries purchased to prepare meals and provide proof to LPA by POC due date.
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide afternoon snacks to residents
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Jean Vera Cruz and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao arrived shortly after. The Department received a complaint on 06/11/2023 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted by LPA Cho on 06/20/2023. During the visit LPA Cho interviewed residents and staff. LPA Mendivil conducted a follow up visit on 08/15/2023 during another complaint visit for 22-AS-20230808134542. LPA Mendivil observed kitchen pantry and refrigerator. Regarding the allegation facility failed to provide afternoon snacks to residents, the investigation revealed the following: Based on interviews with staff 2 out of 2 staff stated they have snacks available for residents. Based on interviews with 2 out of 4 residents indicate there is food and snacks available in the home. CONT on LIC 9099-C dated 12/14/2023. Unsubstantiated The remaining 2 residents could not confirm or deny if there are snacks available in the home. LPA Mendivil observed snack and fruit in the refrigerator. Based on Department regulation, 87555 General Food Service Requirements, regarding snacks states " (b)The following food service requirements shall apply: (3) Between-meal nourishment or snacks shall be made available for all residents unless limited by dietary restrictions prescribed by a physician." Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through interviews and observation the allegation Facility failed to provide afternoon snacks to residents is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230612075559
Dec 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the plan of correction for complaint referenced #22-AS-20230317113524. LPA was greeted and granted entry by caregiving staff after stating the purpose of the visit. An interview was conducted with facility staff S1. Per the updated LIC500 provided by facility administrator on December 12, 2023 along with facility observation and staff interview, the type A deficiency cited on December 5, 2023 was noted as cleared. A clearance letter for the citation, an amended LIC9099-D for the deficiency cited on December 5, 2023 and a copy of the present report were provided to a facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023
Dec 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek timely medical assistance Facility lacked care and supervision resulting in a resident's malnourishment
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was notified of the visit and arrived later to assist. The allegations investigated were presented to the administrator. An initial complaint investigation visit was conducted by LPA Saborit-Guasch on March 20, 2023. The complaint was investigated by the Department and consisted of a review of staff and resident’s records, a physical plant inspection and interviews of staff, witnesses and residents. Emergency Medical Transport records were obtained in addition to hospital records from Orange County Global and Kaiser Hospital. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099 Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on August 29, 2022. Physician record dated August 28, 2022, documents resident’s weight to be 208 pounds. R1’s medical history upon admission is noted to be “atrial fibrillation, history of recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, hypothyroidism, a history of diastolic congestive heart failure and adrenal insufficiency”. R1’s Preplacement Appraisal Information also includes “Celiac disease [Defined by the Mayo Clinic as “an illness caused by an immune reaction to eating gluten. Gluten is a protein found in foods containing wheat, barley or rye. If you have celiac disease, eating gluten triggers an immune response to the gluten protein in your small intestine. Over time, this reaction damages your small intestine's lining and prevents it from absorbing nutrients, a condition called malabsorption”], Diarrhea, Fall risk, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension (…) and long term warfarin usage”. Hospital notes from Kaiser dated November 19, 2022, state a weight of 186 pounds. On November 18, 2022, R1 was transferred to Orange Global Hospital for chest pain, constant, sub-sternal, pressure-like, non-radiating with pain at 8/10 after a facility caregiver measured R1’s blood pressure at 188/109 with an elevated heart rate. Administrator and responsible party were notified. During the initial assessment at the hospital, R1’s Body Mass Index was calculated to be 25.9, placing the resident in a normal range. R1 was then transferred to Kaiser Hospital on November 19, 2022. An interview with R1’s Kaiser Primary Care Physician was conducted to review the medical diagnoses based on nutritional assessment conducted by a Kaiser RN stated that R1 “qualifies for severe malnutrition in the context of chronic illness, as of 11/20/2022. Weight loss: -12 kg weight loss over 3 months = 12.5%. Loss of subcutaneous fat: mild-moderate loss at upper arm region (triceps). Muscle loss: moderate loss at clavicle bone region, moderate loss at acromion bone region (shoulders), moderate loss at scapular bone region, mild-moderate loss in quadriceps and/or calf region (legs)”. According to the physician if R1’s body mass index was less than 18.5 that would qualify him as being underweight, the fact he did have loss of subcutaneous fat and loss of muscle mass could have been contributed by his Celiac Disease. R1’s Body Mass Index was 25.9, which health experts would say was a healthy number for someone of his height. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099-C Regarding the allegation that Facility did not seek timely medical assistance, the following has been concluded: Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, witnesses as well as a review of records resulting from a call to paramedics made on November 17, 2022, and subsequent hospital admissions at Orange County Global Hospital and Kaiser Hospital, facility staff measured R1’s blood pressure to be elevated. Following this, both the facility administrator and R1’s authorized representative were notified. R1’s authorized representative appears to have placed the call to the paramedics upon her arrival at the facility, however no lapse of time in contacting the paramedics was evidenced due to potential facility staff neglect. As a result, the allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Regarding the allegation that Facility lacked care and supervision resulting in a resident's malnourishment, the following has been concluded: Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, witnesses as well as a review of records resulting from a call to paramedics made on November 17, 2022 and subsequent hospital admissions at Orange County Global Hospital and Kaiser Hospital, both a sufficient Body Mass Index of 25.9 and a potential history of weight loss evaluated at approximately “12.5%, [with] loss of subcutaneous fat: mild-moderate loss at upper arm region, muscle loss: moderate loss at clavicle bone region, moderate loss at acromion bone region, moderate loss at scapular bone region, mild-moderate loss in quadriceps and calf region”. An interview conducted by telephone with R1’s primary care provider at Kaiser Hospital evidenced that “[R1]’s body mass index is fine for his body mass” and further hypothesized that the documented celiac disease could have been a contributing factor in the loss of subcutaneous fat and loss of muscle mass described by the hospital staff. Therefore the evidence is not sufficient to establish both the actual state of malnutrition and whether it can be attributed in part or in full to the facility’s lack of care and supervision. The allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative. CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099 During the initial investigation, LPA was provided with a copy of Facility Roster form LIC500 dated January 18, 2020. The licensee did not provide any other updated staff’s schedule. During the investigation, four individual staff members were identified as providing care and supervision at the facility, with shifts covering both day time and night time hours. However, on multiple instances of Department’s inspection to the facility, response delays were noted due to the fact that staff members were actually covering both the present facility and the adjacent facility (Jade Guest House, license number 306006062). One single staff member cannot be deemed sufficient to take care of two separate facilities without a centralized call system, both with a capacity of six residents including some bedbound residents. Without actual schedules, it could not be established whether this was a regular occurrence, however two separate facility visits resulted in the same deficiency being observed and a civil penalty for a repeat violation was issued to the licensee. As a result, the allegation is found to be Substantiated, meaning that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. A Type A citation is issued on the attached form LIC9099-D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with appeal rights were provided to a facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230317113524
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 6, 2023
(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation conducted at the facility, on at least (...) two separate occasions staff members were observed to be absent from the premises. This constitutes an immediate risk to the health, safety and personal rights of individuals in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee offers to provide documentation of the elapsed week from the present visit until the plan of correction due date to demonstrate staffing and adequate coverage. This 9099-D was amended to modify the plan of corrections due date per Department policy.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 33 documents
202319 state visits · 25 documents
Oct 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is not meeting resident's needs. Facility is malodorous.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Jean Vera Cruz, caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Licensee/Administrator Brevet Dao arrived at 10:40 am. The department received a complaint on 07/21/2023 and LPA Cho conducted the initial 10 day visit on 07/28/2023. During the course of the investigation LPA Cho interviewed staff and residents. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of apprasials/needs and services plans. Regarding the allegations that Staff is not meeting resident's needs and facility is malodorous, the investigation revealed the following: LPA Mendivil reviewed 4 out of 4 residents files. Per review 4 out of 4 Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan did not provide actionable objectives/plans. Review of Resident 1 (R1) Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated 12/01/2022 indicating R1’s diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, bipolar, mild cognitive impairment, depression, and unsteady gait. CONT on LIC 9099-C Substantiated For the category of Physical/Health it is noted that “because of Parkinson’s affecting him, his physical mobility has been affected” it was noted that Physical Therapist (PT) and Occupational Therapist (OT) would be responsible for this need. Based on interviews with Administrator as of the date 12/02/2022 no PT/OT has seen R1. Review of Resident 2 (R2) Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated 01/14/2023 indicating R2 is diagnosed with depression, psychosis, and dementia. In the category of Emotional Needs, it is noted “he is able to adjust emotionally and no issues”. For the objective/plan for the emotional need the objective is “to continue to monitor”, per review there is no actionable item to monitor. Based on LPA’s observations of R2, R2 remains in his room and does not socialize with house mates. Review of Resident 3 (R3) Appraisal/Need and Services Plan dated 04/14/2023 indicating R3 is diagnosed with dementia, hypertension, and glaucoma. It is also noted that R3 needs assistance with all activities of daily living. In the category for Functioning Skills, it is noted "due to generalized weakness overall body function is affected", for the objective/plan "encourage to mobilize extremities, perform exercises on both hands and feet" the care team is responsible for this action. Based on interviews with witnesses, PT has been utilized but care giving staff has not. Review of Resident 4 (R4) Appraisal/Need and Services Plan dated 06/02/2023 indicating R4 is diagnosed with wernickie's encephalopathy and dementia. Per review of all five category's did not list any services for a diagnosis of dementia. Regarding the facility being malodorous LPA Mendivil experienced a strong smell of body odor and urine when entering the room of R1 and R3 on multiple occasions, no explanation provided from staff. Therefore, based on evidence through records reviewed and interviews the allegations that Staff is not meeting resident's needs and facility is malodorous are determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. Civil penalty is assessed due to repeat violation within 12 months. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230721153400
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2023
(a) The services provided by the facility shall be conducted so as to continue and promote, to the extent possible, independence and self-direction for all persons accepted for care... This requirement was not met as evidence by in 4 out of 4 residents needs and services did not provide actionable items to assist residents in any given category. This poses a potential risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to update resident needs and services. Licensee stated will keep records of actions taken and outcomes daily.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2023
87625 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement was not met as evidence by LPA Mendivil experienced a strong body odor and urine smell from R1 & R3's room. This poses a potential health and safety risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee has a cleaning schedule and as of 10/17/2023, the facility no longer is malodorous.
Oct 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: facility does not maintain a healthful and comfortable accommodations for residents Facility water temperature is not within regulatory temperature range
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into facility by caregiver Jean Vera Cruz and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was notified of LPA’s arrival and joined approximately at 10:40am. The Department received a complaint on 05/11/2023 and conducted the initial visit on 05/19/2023. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of pertinent documents including but not limited to: physician orders. In regards to the allegations Facility does not maintain a healthful and comfortable accommodations for residents and Facility water temperature is not within regulatory temperature range the investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation facility does not maintain a healthful and comfortable accommodations for residents, it was alleged Resident 1 (R1) was left in soiled clothing. Per physician report dated 12/14/2021 R1 is able to dress and groom self and is able to communicate needs. R1 is noted to have a diagnosis of Depression, Bipolar disorder and Parkinson’s disease. Unsubstantiated During LPAs visit on 5/19/23 LPA Mendivil observed R1 to have stained clothing and noted a strong body odor coming from R1. Per records reviewed, R1 needs and service plan dated 12/1/22 does not address and/or note any issues with R1’s refusal and/or inability to self care for grooming needs. Per interviews conducted with facility staff, R1 will refuse to provide staff with their laundry at times. Staff reported doing laundry at minimum twice a week for residents in care and sometimes more, depending on how much laundry there is to wash. Interviews conducted with 4 of 4 residents could not corroborate the allegation. R1 reported their laundry is clean after staff wash their clothes and reported they have enough clean clothing. Although R1 at times will refuse to participate in meeting own hygiene needs, it does not appear that the facility did not maintain a healthful and comfortable accommodations for residents. Therefore, based on preponderance of evidence, the allegation has been determined to be Unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. It was alleged the facility water temperature is not within regulatory temperature range. During LPA’s visit dated 09/26/2023 LPA tested hot water temperature in bathroom 1 and observed the hot water to be 110 degrees F. Facility does not maintain a hot water temperature log. Per interviews with residents, residents reported the water to be ice cold. Staff denied knowledge of issues regarding hot water. Therefore, based on preponderance of evidence, the allegations has been determined to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided at the time of exit. During LPA’s initial visit, no residents were observed to have full bedrails. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence gathered, We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility representative. It was alleged the Facility is using half bed rails without physician orders. During the investigation, LPA observed Resident 2 (R2) to have half bed rails. Upon review of R2’s physician orders, no order could be found for half bedrails. LPA further observed Resident 3 (R3) to have half bedrails. Upon review of R3’s file, R3 was observed to have physician orders on file for half rails. During LPA’s initial visit, no residents were observed to have full bedrails. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence gathered, the allegations that Facility is using half bed rails without physicians orders and Facility's shower drain is in disrepair are determined to be Substantiated. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D, and appeal rights was provided at the time of exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230511091058
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 18, 2023
87608(a)(3) (a) Postural Supports. Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that appraisal,...(3) A written order from the physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident's record. This requirement was not as evidence by R2 did not have physician's orders for half bed rails. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee previously removed R2's bedrails and currenlty R2 is no longer at the facility.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2023
(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidence by LPA observed drain in bathroom 1 to have pooling when water was ran. This poses a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee corrected issue after visit on 05/19/2023.
Sep 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Administrator is evicting residents without a written notice
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Ben Briones and explained the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint on 09/20/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 09/21/2023. During the course of the visit LPA Mendivil interviewed staff, residents and a witness. Regarding the allegation administrator is evicting residents without a written notice, the investigation revealed the following: Based on interivews with residents 2 out of 3 residents stated they were told on the morning of 09/20/2023 that they were going to be evicted and needed to relocate due to renovations. Interviews with 2 out 3 residents indicated they were offered a room at another licensed facility and were given 1 day to decide if they wanted to move to the other licensed facility. CONT on LIC 9099-C dated 09/21/2023 Substantiated Based on interviews with 2 out 3 residents indicated after they contacted their advocates the administrator provided an eviction notice around 6pm on 09/20/2023. Based on interviewers with residents 1 resident was not given the eviction notice and instead it was placed inside of the locked medicine cabinet and had to ask for the caregiver to provide the form. The 3rd resident would not answer LPA Mendivil's questions. Based on interviews with witnesses indicate the residents told them they felt like they were being evicted and given no option but to move the other licensed facility. Per interviews with Administrator Brevet Dao, Administrator Dao stated she did not give residents an ultimatum to move to another facility, but felt that she was providing residents with options. Administrator Dao stated she did not provide the written notices until after residents were informed verbally. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed and interviews the allegation Administrator is evicting residents without a written notice is SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230920162715
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a)(5)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 2, 2023
(a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). ... (5) Change of use of the facility. A) The licensee may, upon no less than sixty (60) days written notice... ... evict a resident due to change of use of the facility. This requirement was not met as evidence by Administrator verbally told residents they needed to relocate due to eviction. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee provided written eviction notice to residents.
Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility denied visitors
On this day Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Andrea Mendivil and Rosie Quiroz made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Mendivil and LPA Quiroz were greeted granted entry into the facility by caregiver Ben Briones and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was available by phone. The department received a complaint on 08/08/2023. During the course of the investigation LPA Mendivil inteviewed staff and obtained copies of documents such as admission agreement. Regarding the allegation faciltiy denied visitors, the investigation revealed the following: Based on review of facility's admission agreement visitation hours are from 9am-7pm and admission agreement states "should other visiting times be needed, please contact the facility in advance to make arrangements". CONT on LIC 9099-C dated 08/15/2023. Unsubstantiated Based on interview with facility staff there was not been a time they have denied access to visitations. It was reported by witnesses that the facility did not allow visitations at 7:45pm and facility was called and no one responded to the door bell or phone. Interview with witness stated they did not call prior to 7:45pm to arrange a late visitation. Interviews with staff indicate they do not remember an instance when they did not answer the phone or the door. Therefore based on a preponderance of evidence through interviews and records reviewed the allegation facility denied visitors is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230808134542
Jul 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre and Dwayne Mason made an unannounced case management visit (See complaint #22-AS-20230721153400 dated 7/21/23). Earlier in the day, an attempted visit was initiated earlier this morning by Department personnel which had to be ended due to safety concerns. LPAs Mason and Alejandre conducted a Health and Safety visit at the facility to ensure the safety of the residents and staff and to retrieve State equipment. LPAs were greeted and granted entry by staff and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs along with staff toured the facility and reviewed resident medications and records. LPAs observed all residents were asleep at the time of the visit. LPAs observed both resident bathrooms were clean and operational. LPA observed a 7 day non-perishable and 2 day perishable food supply on hand. LPAs observed the facility had electricity, gas and water service. During the visit the facility temperature was 79.8 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed a rodent caught in a trap in the water heater closet next to the bathroom. LPAs reviewed R1's medication records. R1 was prescribed Metformin 1000 mg twice a day, Simvastin 20 mg once a day, One-Daily Multivitamin one tablet a day, and Lisinopril 10 mg once a day. A review of R1's medication administration record shows R1 was not administered any medication on June 30, 2023. LPAs observed the kitchen was clean and organized. LPAs observed the see something say something poster (PUB 475) posted in the hallway. LPAs observed the fireplace in the living room is screened. LPAs observed water leaking from a drain pipe on the outside walkway leading to the back exit gate. LPAs observed next to the back exit gate, adjacent to the garage an old chair, nightstand and a dresser. LPAs observed the cleaning supplies are kept locked under the sink. LPAs observed the knives and sharp objects are kept locked in the caregiver's room. Based on the observations made during today's visit deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations and a civil penalty is being issued for a repeat violation within a 12 month period. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2023
The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by, LPAs observed a dead rodent caught in a trap in the water heater closet. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have a professional exterminator service the facility to eliminate the rodent issue. Licensee to forward proof to LPA by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87468.1(a)(16) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2023
To receive or reject medical care or other services. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by, a review of the medication administration record shows R1 did not receive their prescribed medications, Metformin, Simvastatin, Lisinopril and One-Daily Multivitamin on June 30, 2023. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to ensure all residents received medication as prescribed and to document all medication administered. Licensee agrees to train staff in regards to residents rights and medication administration. Licensee to submit proof to LPA by POC due date.
Jul 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with complaint visit . LPA met with Staff Ben Briones and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Mendivil arrived at the facility at 8:00 am for a complaint visit. LPA knocked on the door and rang the door bell for approximately 5 minutes without any answer. The facility is located on a lot with two separate properties. The two operate as separate facilities on the same property. Staff left the facility located in the front of the property unattended to go to the facility located to back of the property. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. Immediate civil penalties are being assessed. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87467 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 12, 2023
(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidence by; facility staff was not present when LPA arrived. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee stated will conduct another in-service. Licensee will update LIC 500 and provide a copy to CCLD by 07/11/2023 COB.
Jul 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez made an unannounced case management visit for the purpose of citing deficiencies. LPA met with Staff Ben Briones and explained the reason for the visit. On today’s date, Investigation Bureau (IB) conducted a follow-up visit at the facility and knocked at the door for about 15 minutes before a resident answered. The property the facility is located on has a front and back house. The two operate as separate facilities on the same property. Staff left the facility located in the front of the property unattended to go to the facility located to back of the property. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. Immediate civil penalties are being assessed. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 8, 2023
(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not met as evidence by; Facility resident answered the door for IB due to staff leaving the facility unattended to go to another facility located in the back of the same property.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2023
Plan of correction: Staff Briones stated that they stepped to the back facility because that is where resident food is prepared and then brought to front facility. Staff Briones stated they will coordinate with other facility to have food brought rather then stepping away to retrieve it to ensure there is always supervison. An in-service is going to be held to ensure staff is coordinating so that there is always care and supervision of the residents.
Jun 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical care for resident in care
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings, LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Ben Briones and explained the reason for the visit. The deparmtnet received a complaint on 04/14/2023 and the department conducted the initial 10 day visit on 04/20/2023. During the course of the investigation LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and resident and obtained copies of pertinent documents such as physician reports. Regarding the allegation staff did not seek medical care for resident in care. Based on witnesses accounts Resident 1 (R1) fell sometime in the PM hours and R1 was on the floor. It was reported that staff was called into R1's room and picked up R1 and placed R1 back into bed. Per review of R1's physicians report dated 01/22/2022 does not indicate R1 is a fall risk. Unsubstantiated Based on witness' statements a physical therapist conducted an assessment on 03/30/2023 and R1 did not complain of pain and did not exhibit pain behaviors. Based on witness statements another assessment was conducted on 04/10/2023 a complete head to toe assessment and did not observe any indications of pain or injury. R1 was unable to be interviewed as R1 would not answer LPA Mendivil's questions. The facility staff was unable to confirm if R1 fell on 4/5/2023. Staff reported that if a resident was to fall and complain of pain they would call 911. Staff reported that in this case R1 did not complain of pain in the following days. Due to conflicting information from facility and witnesses it cannot be ascertained whether or not the facility did not seek medical care. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through record review and interviews the allegation that Staff did not seek medical care for resident in care is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and confidential names list was provided It was reported that R2 had to go to the hospital and did not return to the facility upon discharge. A report was never received for the incident with R2. Based on interviews with Administrator Brevet Dao Unusual/Serious Injury Report (LIC 624) form was not sent for the incident of R2. Though there is a dispute of a fall occurring with R1, the facility has not followed reporting requirements in a separate incident with R2. Therefore based on preponderance of evidence through record review and interviews the allegation Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230414130816
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 26, 2023
87211(a)(1)(D) Reporting Requirements. Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following…A written report…Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or CONTINUED.. health of any resident…This requirement is not met as evidence by: Licensee failed to submit a written report to CCLD for an incident with R2. This poses a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to review reporting requirement regulations and provide proof of understandin by POC due date
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jun 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver amended report for Case Management dated 06/15/2023. LPA Mendivil visited facility on 06/15/2023 and observed a resident had eloped. LPA Mendivil met with Ben Briones and discussed amended report to assess CIVIL PENALTY. An exit interview was conducted with Ben Briones and a copy of this report, and amended LIC 809-D with LIC 421 IM and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2023
Jun 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit in conjunction with Complaint Control Number 22-AS-20230613154512. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by caregiver Ben Briones and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the complaint visit LPA Mendivil reviewed Resident's 1 (R1) Physician Report (LIC 602) dated 01/02/2023, which indicates R1 is not allow to leave the facility unassisted. LPA Mendivil was not able to speak to R1 as R1 left the facility unassisted at 8am. Staff indicated R1 signed out and left and did not report when they would return Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was discussed with the facility representative and a copy was provided as well as appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 15, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 16, 2023
87464 Basic Services (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidence by, LPA observed a resident had left the faciltiy unassisted, when 602 stated R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted. This causes an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 15, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to review all residents' LIC 602 and provide in service regarding residents ability to leave facility
May 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff failed to keep facility free of vermin
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Ben Briones and explained reason for the visit. Administrator/Licensee Brevet Dao arrived at 3:10pm. The department received a complaint on 05/24/2023 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted on 05/25/2023. During the visit LPA toured the facility and interviewed residents and staff. Regarding the allegation Staff failed to keep facility free of vermin, the investigation revealed the following: During the tour of the facility LPA Mendivil observed rodent droppings present in the living room, hallway cupboard and in resident's closets. Based on interviews with residents 1 out of 5 confirm they have seen rodents present in the facility. 4 out of 5 indicate they have not seen or heard any rodents, and the final resident was not available to interview due to not being oriented to space and time. CONT on 9099-C dated 05/25/2023 Substantiated Based on interviews with staff indicated they have not seen a presence of rodents. Interviews with Administrator Brevet Dao indicate she has a contract with a pest control company and they have been out to the house to initiate protocols to safeguard from pest. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through observation of rodent droppings and interviews the allegation that Staff failed to keep facility free of vermin is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. Civil Penalty assessed based on repeat violation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 25, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230524125330
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 26, 2023
87303 Maintenance and Operations: (a )The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requriement was not met as evidence by the facility had the present of rodent droppings in mulitple locations. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to immediately clean kitchen pantry and clean the facility and provide proof to LPA by POC date. Licensee to contact pest control company and provide LPA with date and time of next visit and forward proof to LPA by 06/01/2023.
May 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver amended findings for complaint 22-AS-20230301162939 LPA delivered amended findings to facility on 04/20/2023. LPA Mendivil met with Ben Briones and discussed amended report. An exit interview was conducted with , and a copy of this report, and amended report of findings delivered on 04/20/2023 were provided at exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2023
Apr 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
On today's date, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Alisa Ortiz and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil met with Licensee Brevet Dao on this day for the purpose of discussing ongoing facility issues. The following was discussed: · Concerns regarding recent Substantiated complaints at Licensee’s facility Iris Guest Home. · Licensee's responsibilities of facility oversight · Licensee's requirement to assess residents prior to admission and ensure all preadmission paperwork is completed · Licensee's responsibility to ensure all staff is trained and training is up to date · Licensee’s responsibility to ensure physical plant is maintained and free of insects and vermin · Licensee’s responsibility to ensure medications are received, provided and maintained as prescribed The Licensee Stated as following during today's meeting: · Licensee will designate a staff as Facility Designated Administrator Back up - Licensee will retrain staff in personal rights and medications - Licensee will provide more oversight at the facility including spending more time at the home - Licensee will review and maintain all facility paperwork - Licensee will ensure facility is following all required policy and procedures regarding rate increases and evictions CONT on LIC 809- C During the meeting the Department’s Technical Support Program (TSP) was discussed with Licensee. Licensee expressed interest in Technical Support Program (TSP) and has agreed to participate. Licensee was made aware of the seriousness of recent substantiated allegations and deficiencies issued. Licensee was placed on a compliance plan for a period of one years time effective 04/272023. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Brevet Dao and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 27, 2023
Apr 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility unlawfully raised resident's rent Facility unlawfully evicted resident
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into facility by caregiver Bonifacio Briones and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet was available by phone. The Department received a complaint on 03/06/2023 and conducted the initial visit on 03/14/2023. LPA Andrea Mendivil obtained copies of pertinent documents including but not limited to: admission agreements and resident files, and rent increase letter. In regards to the allegations Facility unlawfully raised resident's rent and Facility unlawfully evicted resident the investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation facility unlawfully raised resident’s rent, LPA verified that 3 of 6 residents in care received a written notice of rate increase from Administrator Dao via text message. Text messages received included a photograph of a written 60 day notice dated February 25, 2023 notifying individuals of rate increase. Substantiated Per written notice observed, written notice failed to address general description of the additional costs. LPA spoke with Administrator Dao who reported the rate increase was due to a change in basic service costs. Administrator Dao did not submit written change in Plan of Operation and/or Admission Agreement to the Department prior to providing residents with notice. Regarding the allegation facility unlawfully evicted resident, it was reported Resident 1 (R1)’s responsible party received a text message from Administrator Dao asking them to relocate R1 from the facility due to the facility needing to close. Text message received did not include required written standards as outlined in Eviction Procedures per Title 22 Section 87224. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence gathered, the allegations that Facility unlawfully raised resident's rent and Facility unlawfully evicted resident are determined to be Substantiated. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D, and appeal rights was provided at the time of exit. During the investigation LPA confirmed rate increases were not specific to one resident but rather provided to multiple residents due to increase utilities, commodities and workforce costs. Although it was confirmed Dao had made multiple attempts to contact resident/ their responsible party documentation provided could not confirm contacts were made with a malicious intent. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence gathered, the allegations that Facility Administrator is retaliating against Resident is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided at the time of exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230306140958
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(g)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 26, 2023
(g) Admission agreements shall specify the following:(4) Modification conditions, including the requirement for the provision of at least 60 days prior written notice to the resident of any rate or rate structure change... This requirement was not met as evidence by Administrator did not update Plan of Operations or Admission Agreement with new rate. This poses a potential risk to personal rights for persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to update admission agreements and Plan of Operations with update basic rate and what is included with basic rate.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 26, 2023
(a) Eviction Procedures: (a)The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required except as otherwise specified in paragraph (5). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Administrator sent R1's responsible party a text message asking R1 to relocate.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to review eviction procedures and update in Plan of Operations/ Admission Agreement by POC due date and forward proof to LPA.
Apr 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is not following resident's physician dietary orders.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Bonifacio Briones. Administrator Brevet Dao was available by phone. The department received a complaint on 04/03/2023 and the initial visit was conducted on 04/07/2023. During the visit LPA Mendivil obtained copies of physician reports , physician’s dietary recommendations, and sample menu. Regarding the allegation facility is not following resident’s physician dietary orders, the investigation revealed the following: Per documentation Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 02/02/2022. Based on review of LIC 602 Physicians Report dated 01/20/22 R1 does not require a special diet. LPA Mendivil obtained a copy of a letter, dated 11/03/2022, from R1’s physician with recommendation for dietary guidance. Unsubstantiated The letter serves as a recommendation to avoid processed foods, high carb vegetables, potatoes, and rice. Based on interviews with Administrator Dao, Administrator acknowledged she has received the dietary recommendations from R1’s responsible party. Administrator Dao reported that the facility attempts to follow all recommendations and acknowledges will continue to follow recommendations as much as possible. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence gathered, interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations made the allegation that facility is not following resident’s physicians dietary orders is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and confidential names list was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230403084619
Apr 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff yells at residents. Facility staff threw resident's wheelchair. Facility staff does not ensure that the facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature for the residents. Facility staff does not properly store bed linens.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into facility by caregiver Bonifacio Briones and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was available by phone. The Department received a complaint on 03/06/2023 and conducted the initial visit on 03/14/2023. LPA Andrea Mendivil obtained copies of pertinent documents including but not limited to: resident roster and LIC 500 (Personnel Report). In regards to the allegations Facility staff yells at residents; Facility staff threw resident's wheelchair; Facility staff does not ensure that the facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature for the residents; Facility staff does not properly store bed linens the investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation Facility staff yells at residents, interviews conducted with Staff 1 (S1) and Administrator Dao deny allegations of yelling. S1 confirmed they do speak in a loud voice when speaking with residents due to residents being hard of hearing. Substantiated Interviews conducted with two of six residents in care confirmed that S1 does yell at residents. The remaining four residents were unavailable and/or unable to be interviewed due to communication barriers. LPA Mendivil reviewed S1’s personnel file and confirmed S1 has not received current training on resident’s personal rights. Training observed on file expired March 16, 2023, meaning it is older than 12 months time period. Although it does not appear S1’s elevated voice was done with malicious or mal intent, based on interviews conducted with S1 and multiple residents in care, the allegation is determined to be Substantiated. It was alleged facility staff threw resident’s wheelchair due to staff becoming agitated and physically throwing Resident 1 (R1)’s wheelchair. Interviews conducted with S1 and Administrator Dao deny allegation. Interviews conducted with residents in care confirmed S1 can be rough at times when handling residents and/or their belongings. Although it does not appear S1’s rough handling was done with malicious or mal intent, based on interviews conducted with residents in care the allegation is determined to be Substantiated. Regarding the allegation Facility staff does not ensure that the facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature for the residents. Based on observations made during LPA’s visit to the facility on 03/14/2023, LPA observed the facility to be maintained at a comfortable temperature meaning residents did not appear to be over heated, sweating and/or unreasonably cold. Temperature within the facility appeared to be maintained within regulatory requirements. Interviews with 3 out of 6 residents indicate that the temperature in the facility is comfortable. The remaining three residents were unable and/or refused to be interviewed. During a separate complaint investigation dated 1/20/2023 the allegation that Facility has no heat was substantiated. Therefore, the allegation facility failed to maintain temperature within regulatory requirements is deemed to be Substantiated. The facility was previously cited on 1/20/2023 for violation and has since corrected deficiency. Regarding the allegation facility does not properly store bed linens, during previous visit dated 03/14/2023 LPA Mendivil observed bed linens being stored in a pile on facility outside patio. Patio was uncovered and accessible to outside elements. During follow up visit dated 4/7/2023 LPA observed linens had been freshly cleaned, sorted, and restored in a linen closet located within the facility. Based on LPA’s observations, the allegation that facility does not properly store bed linens is deemed to be Substantiated. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D, and appeal rights was provided at the time of exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230329103817
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 1, 2023
(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidence by: 2 out of 6 residents stated that S1 yells. This poses a potential risk to persons safety in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to conduct in staff training on personal rights and provide LPA with proof by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 1, 2023
(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights(3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature... This requirement was not met as evidence by: S1 has handled residents belongings in a rough manner. This poses a potential risk safety to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to conduct in staff training on handling residents belongings and provide LPA with proof by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(3)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2023
(3) Equipment and supplies necessary for personal care ... shall be readily available to each resident... (C) Clean linen... The quantity shall be sufficient to permit changing at least once per week or more often when indicated to ensure that clean linen is in use by residents at all times. The linen shall be in good repair… This requirement was not met as evidence by LPA observed linens in outside patio on 03/14/2023. This poses a potential health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator has since corrected issue. Linens are clean and properly stored inside closet in the facility.
Apr 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff lack emergency disaster training Facility does not have emergency oxygen An uncleared individual is living in facility
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit in order to conduct a complaint visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Leo Garias and explained the reason for the visit. Brevet Dao was not present. The Department received a complaint on 10/31/2022 and conducted the initial visit on 10/31/2022. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of pertinent documents including but not limited to: staffing documents, medication records and facility roster. In regards to the allegations facility staff lack emergency disaster training, facility does not have emergency oxygen, and An uncleared individual is living in facility, the investigation revealed the following: Unfounded For allegation facility failed to maintain temperature within regulatory requirements. Based on observations made during LPA’s visits to the facility on 10/31/2022, LPA observed the facility to be maintained at a comfortable temperature meaning residents did not appear to be over heated, sweating and/or unreasonably cold. Temperature within the facility appeared to be maintained within regulatory requirements. Interviews with 3 out of 6 residents indicate that the temperature in the facility is comfortable. The remaining three residents were unable and/or refused to be interviewed. During a separate complaint investigation dated 1/20/2023 the allegation that Facility has no heat was substantiated. Therefore, the allegation facility failed to maintain temperature within regulatory requirements is deemed to be substantiated. The facility was previously cited on 1/20/2023 for violation and has since corrected deficiency. Regarding the allegation that facility failed to address pest infestation, the Investigation determined the facility does have a pest infestation, including but not limited to roaches and rodents. During LPA’s multiple visits to the facility LPA observed multiple mouse traps along with rodent droppings in multiple resident rooms. Interviews conducted with 2 of 6 residents confirmed residents have not seen rodents in the facility, however, acknowledge seeing rodent droppings on multiple occasions. Although the facility implemented rodent traps at the facility, the facility failed to properly address the pest infestation as evidence by the on going rodent droppings visible in the facility despite having implemented rodent traps. Therefore, the allegation is determined to be Substantiated. Regarding the allegation that the facility lacks emergency lights, the investigation determined that the facility does not have emergency lighting. Based on interview with Administrator Brevet Dao it was reported that the facility utilizes hallway and bathroom lights as lights at night. This does not constitute emergency lighting as it would not be available during a potential power outage. Therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. For the allegation that resident bedrooms have insufficient lighting, LPA Mendivil observed 2 out of 3 resident bedrooms had missing light bulbs. It appears the facility utilizes natural light during the day and due to missing light bulbs, the facility does not have sufficient lighting for night time. Therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D, and appeal rights was provided at the time of exit. Regarding the allegation Facility staff lack emergency disaster training, LPA reviewed five of five staff files. Of the staff files reviewed, LPA confirmed five of five staff have documentation of current emergency disaster training. Staff interviewed were able to explain the process of disaster training. Interviews with staff indicate that they are also CPR trained. LPA verified one of five staff present has a current CPR training. The remaining four of five staff have current first aid training. Therefore the allegation that facility staff lack emergency disaster training is determined to be Unfounded. Regarding the allegation that facility does not have emergency oxygen, during the investigation LPA confirmed that facility maintained multiple spare oxygen canisters in the facility garage. LPA confirmed canisters to be full and operational. Therefore the allegation that facility does not have emergency oxygen has been determined to be Unfounded. LPA Mendivil cross reviewed facility Personnel Summary List and all staff listed on LIC 500 (Personnel Report) and confirmed all staff listed are associated with the facility. LPA Mendivil also reviewed documentation such as, but not limited to, staff files of which all present employees were reflected as having the necessary criminal background clearance. Therefore the allegation Uncleared individual is living in the facility has been determined to be Unfounded. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided at the time of exit. * Due to technical difficulties LPA was unable to print documents, documents were emailed to Administrator and a copy was retained on file.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221031081441
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 21, 2023
87303 Maintenance and Operations: (a )The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requriement was not met as evidence by the facility had multple rodent traps, but the present of rodent droppings were still visble. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator has provided LPA with pest control contract which is for pest control to visit facility quaterly and as needed. Retained copy on file.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(h) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 26, 2023
87303 (h) Emergency lighting shall be maintained. At a minimum this shall include flashlights, or other battery powered lighting, readily available in appropriate areas accessible to residents and staff. Open-flame lights shall not be used. This requirement is not met as evidence by Administrator stated that the facility utilizes hallway and bathroom lights on at night. Facility does not have emergency lighting set up.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to distrubute emergency lighting to appropiate areas.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(3)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 26, 2023
87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (3) Equipment and supplies necessary for personal care ... shall be readily available to each resident. The resident may provide the following items; however, if the resident is unable or chooses not to provide them, the licensee shall assure provision of: B) Bedroom furniture, which shall include, for each resident,.. a lamp, or lights sufficient for reading... This requirement was not met as evidence by 2 out of 3 residents bedrooms have missing light bulbs. This poses a potential risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to replace all missing light bulbs and provide proof to LPA by POC due date.
Apr 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is malodorous. Ombudsman poster is not posted in facility. Facility did not administer medications to resident. Resident was not given an admission agreement.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into facility by caregiver Leo Garias and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was notified of LPA’s arrival and joined via telephone. The Department received a complaint on 03/01/2023 and conducted the initial visit on 03/02/2023. LPA Alvaro Ramirez obtained copies of pertinent documents including but not limited to: medication records and admission agreements. In regards to the allegations Facility is malodorous; Ombudsman poster is not posted in facility; Residents are not provided adequate bedding; Facility did not administer medications to resident; and Resident was not given an admission agreement, the investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation Facility is malodorous, LPA experienced a strong urine like odor coming from the bedroom of Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) during multiple visits to the facility. ** This is an amended report ** Substantiated LPA confirmed R1 and R2 require incontinence care assistance from facility staff. LPA interviewed residents but was unable to determine frequency of incontinence services. Regarding the allegation the Ombudsman poster is not posted in the facility, LPA Alvaro Ramirez confirmed via photograph taken that Ombudsman poster was not properly posted in a visible location. While the facility was observed to have a poster present in the building, poster was observed laying on an end table in facility living room. Regarding the allegation Facility did not administer medications to resident, LPA confirmed Resident 3 (R3)’s medication was being rationed by facility staff due to pharmacy failing to provide refill for prescription on time. LPA spoke with Administrator Brevet Dao who stated she did reach out to the pharmacy once notified the pharmacy failed to refill medication on time. R3’s physician was not notified of the missed medication dosages. It was alleged resident was not given an admission agreement due to R3 not receiving an admission agreement. LPA interviewed R3 who confirmed they did not receive a copy of admission agreement upon moving in. R3 reported they were provided an Admission Agreement on 3/04/23 by Administrator Dao for signature. R3 moved into the facility on 12/18/2021. Therefore, based on the preponderance of evidence gathered, the allegations that Facility is malodorous; Ombudsman poster is not posted in facility; Residents are not provided adequate bedding; Facility did not administer medications to resident; and Resident was not given an admission agreement are determined to be Substantiated. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D, and appeal rights was provided at the time of exit. * Due to technical difficulties LPA was unable to print document, document emailed to Administrator Therefore based on preponderance of evidence through records reviewed, observations made and interviews conducted the allegation Residents are not provided adequate bedding is determined to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and confidential names list was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230301162939
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 26, 2023
87625 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement is not met as evidence by the facility bedroom of R1 and R2 had a strong urine odor. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator create a schedule for cleaning and incontinence care and provide proof to LPA by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(a)(12) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 26, 2023
To contact the ... ombudsman ... The licensee shall post the telephone numbers and addresses for the local offices ... and ombudsman program, in accordance with Section 9718 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, conspicuously in the facility foyer, lobby, residents’ activity room, or other location easily accessible to residents. This requirement was not met as evidence by LPA Ramirez took photographic evidence of ombudsman poster on a table in the living room. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator has since corrected the deficency. Ombudsman poster is displayed in the facility entryway.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87464(f)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 21, 2023
87464 (f)Basic services shall at a minimum include:(4)Personal... assistance with taking prescribed medications...This requirement was not met as evidenced by based on interviews facility was rationing R3's medication.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to ensure all medications are refiled as necessary.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(C) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 21, 2023
Admission Agreements shall be signed and dated, acknowledging the contents of the document, by the resident or the resident’s representative, and the licensee no later than seven days following admission. This requirement was not met as evidence by R3 did not sign agreement until 3/4/2023. R3 entered facility on 12/18/2021 This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator has since retained a signed copy on file and provided R3 with a copy of signed admission agreement,
Apr 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Plan of Correction (POC) visit, based upon the deficiencies cited in LIC form 809D on 03/14/2023. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Leo Garias and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao arrived at 9:40 am. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87506 (a) pertaining to Resident Records has been cleared. Resident files are at the facility and accessible. Licensee has complied with the POC. *Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87405 (a) pertaining to Administrator - Qualifications and Duties has been cleared, Licensee provided an LIC 308 with a designated back up administrator. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87465 (h) (2) pertaining to Incidental Medical and Dental Care has NOT been cleared. LPA Mendivil observed unsecured medications in refrigerator. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED. Based on the observations made during today's visit, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was discussed with the Administrator and a copy was left with facility representative as well as appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 8, 2023
(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2)Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This was not met as evidenced by LPA observed unsecured medication in refrigerator this is a health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee placed medications in locked box in refrigerator. Staff will take a picture of locked box and provide to administrator it is locked after medications are administered.
Mar 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a Case Management inspection based on deficiencies observed during a complaint investigation visit for complaint #22-AS-20230317113524. Upon arriving at the facility and before entering the premises, LPA could hear the facility's sound alarm from the smoke detectors inside the facility. Upon ringing the bell, knocking the door and being greeted by facility's caregiver staff, LPA was able to confirm that the alarms were being triggered by cooking fumes inside the house in spite of the extractor fan running and kitchen window being open. A deficiency is being issued per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. Later during the visit, LPA requested, obtained and reviewed facility records for the six individuals currently in care. Upon review of the residents' physician records, the following was observed: - One resident admitted to the facility on January 14, 2023 had a physician report showing a date of examination of November 15, 2021, which is in excess of the required maximum of a year prior to admission. - Two residents with a Dementia diagnosis show outdated physician reports that have not been reassessed over the past calendar year. Two deficiencies to Title 22 regulations are cited to that extent. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, citations and appeal rights were provided to the facility representative via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2023
The California Code of Regulations 87468.1(a)(2) on Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities states that (a) Residents (...) shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Upon arriving at the facility, LPA observed smoke detectors being triggered across the entire facility by cooking fumes. This constitute a potential risk to the health, safety and personal rights of the individuals in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to ensure that all smoke detectors are in adequate working order. The extractor fan shall be verified to be of a sufficient capacity to avoir smoke alarms being triggered by staff cooking meals for the residents.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 17, 2023
The California Code of Regulations Section 87458(a) on Medical Assessment states that "Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year." This requirement is not met as evidenced by Record for one resident admitted to the facility on January 14, 2023 had a physician report showing a date of examination of November 15, 2021. This constitutes a potential risk to the health, safety and personal rights of the individuals in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to obtain an updated medical assessment for the resident in question before the plan of corrections due date of April 17, 2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 17, 2023
The California Code of Regulations Section 87705(c)(5) on the Care of Persons with Dementia states that: "(5) Each resident with dementia shall have an annual medical assessment (...) done at least annually(...)." This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of resident records kept at the facility, two residents with diagnosed dementia are showing medical assessments that have been conducted more than a year prior to the inspection's date. This constitutes a potential risk to the health, safety and personal rights of individuals in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to obtain updated medical assessments which shall include a reassessment of the resident’s dementia care needs before the plan of corrections due date.
Mar 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing food in the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Leo Garias and explained the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint on 02/23/2023 and the initial visit was conducted on 03/02/2023 by LPA Alvaro Ramirez Jr. During the course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff, residents and witnesses. In addition the department obtained copies of facility menu. Regarding the allegation staff are not providing food in the quantity and quality necessary to meet the needs of the residents, the investigation revealed the following: It was reported by witnesses that facility is providing residents with peanut butter and jelly sandwiches with spam for dinner and other meals include chicken and white rice. Based on observations by both LPAs Ramirez and Mendivil observed the refrigerator was stocked with eggs, bread, ham, and chicken. LPA Mendivil observed a sample menu on the refrigerator. CONT on 9099-c Unsubstantiated Based on interviews with Administrator Brevet Dao the menu is not always followed and it is modified. Administrator stated they try to accommodate all resident's dietary restrictions with are mostly low sodium and low carbohydrate meals. Interviews with staff indicate that groceries are purchased every 5 days Based on interviews with 3 out 6 residents stated they thought the food was sufficient in quantity but lacked in quality. 2 remaining residents stated that the food was satisfactory for both quantity and quality. The final resident was unable to be interviewed as they are oriented to time and space. All interviewed residents mentioned cereal or oatmeal for breakfast, chicken and rice for lunch and soup and sandwiches for dinner. Based on preponderance of evidence through observations and interviews the allegation that staff are not providing food in the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. This agency has investigated this complaint. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and confidential names list was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230223151647
Mar 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with a complaint investigation for complaint control # 22-AS-20230306140958. LPA was greeted and granted entry to the facility by Leo Garias, caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. During the complaint investigation LPA Mendivil observed unlocked medication in the refrigerator for a resident that is no longer at the facility. LPA Mendivil asked for resident and staff files and the facility was unable to produce files within a timely manner. Administrator Brevet was not present at the time of visit and does not have a designated back up administrator. Based on the observations made during today's visit, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was discussed with the Administrator and a copy was left with facility representative as well as appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 15, 2023
(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2)Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement was not met as evidence by facility had unsecured medication in the refridgerator which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to remove all medications from unsecured area and place in secured location by POC due date and forward proof to LPA.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 20, 2023
All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. . When the administrator is not in the facility, there shall be coverage by a designated substitute who shall have qualifications adequate to be responsible... This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure there was a designation of responsibility issued to LPA during absence of administrator. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a statement of understanding regarding designation of responsibility, LIC 308, and forward proof to LPA by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 16, 2023
(a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Administrator had files at a separate location and was unable to produce them at the facility, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee to electronically send over files to LPA by POC due date. Licensee to keep files at facility or electronic records for review.
Mar 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not accompany resident to medical appointment Facility has insects
Licensing Program Analyst Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of this complaint investigation. Upon arrival, LPA met with Staff Leo Garrais. Administer Brevet Dao spoke with LPA about the findings via telephone and stated she could not come to the facility. The complaint was investigated and consisted of interviews with the facility staff, Administrator and witnesses. The following was determined: Resident #1 (R1) was admitted into the facility on 12/27/22. R1 had Renal Failure and needed to attend Dialysis three times a week. R1 was confused and disoriented. and needed assistance with all his ADL's. He used a wheelchair to ambulate and needed assistance to get into the wheelchair. He could not leave the facility unassisted. Upon admission, no admission agreement was signed and according to staff and witnesses the POA was informed that the facility staff would take care of the transportation to medical appointments since R1 needed assistance. On 1/4/23, R1 was sent to Dialysis in an Uber. When he arrived, there was no staff to take him from the car into his appointment. Dialysis staff had to bring R1 inside and it was raining. Substantiated Based upon a review of records and the interviews conducted the allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that R1 broke his hip at the facility. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to Leo Garrais. According to interviews a staff member and a medical transport with wheelchair access should have been used to assist R1. On 1/27/23 during the initial 10 day visit, LPA noted rodent droppings and baby cockroaches in the food pantry. Staff immediately removed all food and cleaned the pantry. Administrator Dao was also notified. Based upon a review of records and the interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met and the allegations are substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 regulation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to Staff Leo Garrais.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230127111023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 4, 2023
87465(a)(1)Incidental Medical and Dental Care-The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: On 1/4/23, R1 was sent to Dialysis in an Uber. No staff accompanied him and the Uber did not have wheelchair access. This poses an immediate health and safety risk as well as a personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to meet with residents and/or their responsible party upon admission to sign an admission agreement and decide what type of transportation and supervision is needed and/or expected by the resident and family to meet the resident’s needs. Proof of understanding of this subsection will be provided by Licensee.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 4, 2023
Personal Accommodations and Services-The premises shall be maintained in a state of good repair and shall provide a safe and healthful environment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: On 1/27/2023, LPA observed rodent droppings and small cockroaches in the food pantry of the facility. This pose an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2023
Plan of correction: Staff #1 immediately removed food, cans and other containers from the pantry and cleaned the shelves. LPA notified Administrator Brevet Dao. Licensee agrees to hire an exterminator to rid the facility of cockroaches as well as rodents. Proof that an exterminator was contacted and a contract put in place will be provided by 3/3/23.
Feb 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Andrea Mendivil and Alvaro Ramirez conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to follow up on deficiencies cited on 01/20/2023. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Leodigario Garias and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was unable to be present, but was available by phone. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303 (b) (1) ,licensee is using facility heater and facility temperature read at 70 degrees Fahrenheit Licensee has complied with the POC. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023
Jan 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has no heat
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced complaint visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Leo Garias and explained the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint on 01/17/2023. LPA Mendivil visited facility on 01/18/2023 . Regarding the allegation the facility has no heat,the investigation revealed the following: LPA Mendivil observed the thermostat at 66 degrees fahrenheit on 01/18/2023 during the initial 10 day visit. During the complaint delivering visit the thermostat read at 66 degrees fahrenheit. Interviews with residents indicate they were told the facility heat is not working. Substantiated Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through interviews and observations the allegation that the facility has no heat is SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230117165840
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 26, 2023
87303 Maintenance and Operation (b) A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained at all times. (1) The facility shall heat rooms that residents occupy to a minimum of 68 degree F, (20 degrees C). This requirement was not met as evidence by the facility thermostat read at 66 degrees. This poses a potential heatlh and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to send photo proof daily until 01/26/2023 that the thermostat is at or above 68 degrees as Administrator stated the heater is working and is on.
20225 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to follow up on deficiencies cited on 10/31/2022. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Leodigario Garias and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was unable to be present, but was available by phone. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303 (b) Maintenance and Operation, licensee replaced all broken screens. 87203 Fire Safety, licensee repaired all non operational smoke alarms, all were tested during POC visit and all are operational. 87465 (h)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care, licensee corrected, medications were secured. 87465(h) (6) Incidental Medical and Dental Care licensee updated record keeping for medications for all residents. 87303 (a) Maintenance and Operation, licensee has set up a cleaning schedule and all openings have been sealed. 87307 (d) (6) Personal Accommodations and Services, licensee showed proof that all walkways were cleared Licensee has complied with the POC. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2022
Oct 31, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is not maintained clean Facility walkways are not free of hazards Facility screens are in disrepair & missing Facility fire alarm is in disrepair Medications are not stored properly Medication records are not being kept
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Alisa Ortiz along with Rafael Perez Code Compliance Supervisor, Ines Guzman Code Compliance Officer and Orange County Fire Authority Representative R. D made an unannounced visit for the purposes of conducting an investigation into the above allegations. The investigation determined the following: At approx. 1:16PM LPM and LPA observed a rodent trap in facility kitchen along with rodent droppings. At 1:21PM rodent trap was observed under TV stand in living room. LPA and LPM also observed in resident bedroom #2 at 1:25pm. At 1:17PM 1:24pm ,1:25Pm and1:34PM LPA and LPM observed damaged and or missing screens throughout the home. At 1:17PM LPA and LPM observed a sticky brown substance on wall above the kitchen stove. At 1:18PM LPA and LPM observed damaged kitchen drawer. At 1:20 PM LPA and LPM observed fire alarm to be tapped over and nonoperational and a total of 3 smoke alarms were found to be nonoperational in facility. At 1:21PM wall outlet in resident’s bedroom was observed to be broken and exposing wires. CONT on LIC 9099-C Substantiated At 1:24PM LPA and LPM observed a hole in the wall of bedroom #2. At 1:29PM LPA observed rusted and broken tiles in shower. At 1:31PM dead roaches and rodent droppings. At 1:56PM LPA and LPM observed bike and discarded pictures obstructing walkway. At approximately 3PM LPM Ortiz and Administrator conducted a review of Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) medications. Per the review conducted resident's medications are not being kept and medications. Due to insufficient documentation, it remains unclear if resident's are receiving medications as prescribed. Based on the above information, the following allegations are deemed to be SUBSTANTIATED: Facility is not maintained clean; Facility walkways are not free of hazards; Facility lacks emergency lights; Facility screens are in disrepair & missing; Facility does not have emergency oxygen; Facility fire alarm is in disrepair; Medications are not stored properly; and Medication records are not being kept. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Divison 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, confidential names list, appeal rights and civil penalty assessment was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022 · control 22-AS-20221031081441
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2022
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidence by: LPA and LPM observed rodents and pest present in facility along with rodent droppings. LPA and LPM observed sticky brown substance on kitchen wall and broken cabinet drawers. This poses an immediate health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to set up daily cleaning schedule and seal all openings into the home. Licensee to provide proof by POC due date 11/14/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 14, 2022
87307 Personal Accommodations and Services d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement was not met as evidence by: LPA observed discarded bike and paintings obsturcting walkway along side of house. LPA and LPM observed screws coming out of ground along other side patio/walkwa which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to remove obstructions from walkways and provide picture proof of corrections by POC due date of 11/14/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(b) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 14, 2022
87303 Maintenance and Operation (b) All window screens shall be clean and maintained in good repair. This is evidence by broken and/or missing screens in multiple resident bedrooms and kitchen window, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to repair/replace broken and missing screens and provide proof of correction by POC due date of 11/14/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2022
87203 Fire Safety All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This regulation was not met as evidence by: Based on observation smoke alarm in kitchen and two bedrooms was observed non-operationalis nonoperational and fire alarm pull was observed nonoperational and taped up., this poses an immediate safety risk to persons in care. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to repair non-operational smoke alarms by POC due date of 11/01/2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2022
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked....This regulation was not met as evidence by: Based on observation LPA observed an unlocked medication cabinet in facility entryway.This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to set training date for all staff regarding medication management/storing by 11/01/2022. Training is to be completed by no later than 11/14/2022 and proof of training to be sent to LPA by 11/14/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2022
(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained for at least one year and includes: Based on medication reviewed for Resident 1 and Resident 2 medications records failed to consistently document date medication started and medications missed. It remains unclear if medications are being given as prescribed. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to review all resident's medication and update record keeping. License to provide copies of updated records to LPA by COB 11/01/2022.
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On 10/17/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the plan of corrections resulting from the case management visit led on 10/14/2022. LPA was greeted and granted entry by caregiving staff after explaining the purpose of the visit. LPA requested caregiver to demonstrate where the cleaning supplies are currently stored. Caregiver showed supplies have been moved to the garage. LPA requested caregiver to show the medication storage. Centrally stored medication is adequately stored in a secure closet in the hallway leading to the bedrooms. Two type A violations observed on 10/14/2022 are cleared at this time. LPA conducted an exit interview, reviewed the report with the facility staff and left a copy of the report at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2022
Oct 14, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch conducted an unannounced case management visit after observing multiple deficiencies at the twin facility operated by licensee. LPA was greeted and granted entry by caregiving staff after identifying himself and explaining the purpose of the visit. Administrator Brevet Dao was notified by phone, but was not available to assist with the visit in person. Infection Control measures were reviewed over the phone. Administrator agreed to review the final report over the phone as well and authorized her staff to sign on her behalf. After being greeted, LPA observed caregiver spray deodorizer around the hallway and bathroom after emptying a urine container in the toilet. Floor was afterwards observed to be wet and slippery throughout, which poses a safety hazard due to the risk of slipping. The medication central storage in a hallway closet is also observed to be unlocked at the time of the visit. Cleaning solutions and other potentially toxic substances are also observed to be stored in the laundry closet which is left unlocked after the padlock hinges broke off. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, three deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was reviewed over the phone with facility administrator and signed by authorized facility representative. A copy of this report along with appeal rights was provided and left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2022
The California Code of Regulations Section 87465(h)(2) relative to Incidental Medical and Dental Care indicates that: "Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication." This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed that staff present had left the door to the medication closet unlocked while conducting the inspection visit. Caregiver states that they only lock the medication "when they sleep".the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure that centrally stored medication remain locked and secure at all times.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87705(f) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2022
The California Code of Regulations Section 87705(f) relative to the Care of Persons with Dementia indicates that: "The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (...) nutritional supplements or vitamins, alcohol, cigarettes, and toxic substances" This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed sharp instruments, cleanings solutions, insecticide and/or rodenticide and nutritional supplements left unsecured throughout the physical plant.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure the safe and secure storage of all the identified objects and substances by the Plan of Correction due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 28, 2022
California Code of Regulations Section 87303(a) Maintenance and Operation states that "The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition". This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensing staff observed deodorizer spray making the floor wet and slippery during the inspection visit. Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure the facility is kept clean, safe and sanitary before the plan of corrections due date.
Jul 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shobhana Frank made an unannounced visit to the facility today to conduct required 1 year inspection. During today’s visit, LPA met with Licensee Brevet Dao and explain the purpose of today's visit. LPA Frank toured the facility, inspected resident rooms and bathrooms. There are 5 residents residing in the facility and no active COVID-19 cases. LPA Frank reviewed centrally stored medications and records, reviewed food services, and inspected the kitchen. In addition, LPA Frank tested the hot water temperature, which measured 105 .8 degrees F in resident bathroom. Resident areas were noted to be a comfortable temperature. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be operational. The facility also has fire extinguisher that was mounted and charged. LPA Frank confirmed food supply 2 day supply of perishables and 7 day supply of non-perishable food is available for the number of residents present. Hygiene supplies and supply of linen were observed in quantities for the number of residents in care. LPA observed locked areas for toxins and hazardous items. Medication were observed locked in cabinet. LPA observed COVID - visitation station equipped with hand sanitizer, thermometer, Gloves, visitors log, COVID posters throughout the facility. LPA Frank reviewed : 1.) Designation of Administrative Responsibility (LIC308) 2.) Personnel Report (LIC500); 3.) Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E); 4.) LIC 9020A Client Roster; LIC 808) Mitigation Plan; Current Liability Insurance, Infection Control Plan. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility bathroom, toilet, kitchen sink and kitchen counter is unkempt, which poses an possible health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. An exit interview was conducted with the licensee, A copy of LIC 9102 Technical Assistance and LIC 809 was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2022
20212 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 1, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shobhana Frank conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a Required 1 Year inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Licensee Brevet Dao and reason for visit was explained. Upon entry LPA was screened per COVID guidelines. LPA tour the facility with Licensee. The facility currently has 4 residents in care, of which 1 resident is receiving Hospice services. LPA observed residents taking naps in their room. Facility appears clean and sanitary. All resident's rooms had the required elements as well as restrooms stocked with soap/sanitizer. LPA observed the screening/sanitizing station in the entrance of the facility. Visitors sign in and are screened for temperature. Facility takes resident temperatures daily and documents. Facility has COVID precaution postings as well as all required department postings. Facility has completed the Mitigation Plan and is approved. LPA observed adequate emergency food and water supply as well as the First Aid kit which contained all required items. Facility has all required items of PPE on site. LPA toured the outside grounds and observed ample shaded outside visitation area. Exit gate is unlocked and self latching. LPA observed the medication in locked closet. Facility has a plan for COVID testing residents and staff as needed as well as a plan for isolation. Staff and most residents are vaccinated for COVID-19. Resident files contained updated emergency information as well as required department forms. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were noted per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2021
Sep 9, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. Facility staff do not assist resident with transfers out of bed. Facility staff are not providing resident with an adequate quality and quantity of food.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shobhana Frank made an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA Frank met with Licensee Brevet Dao and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as Physician’s Report dated 09/1/2020, dated Electrocardiogram dated 8/26/20, COVID – 19 Negative report 8/31/20, Admission Agreement dated 9/1/20, Vitas Hospice care Medication list dated 10/1/20, Vitas Hospice Care visit list, Note from the family date- 11/10/20. LPA interviewed Staff 1 (S1) Staff 2 (S2) Resident 1 (R1) Vitas Nurse, residents daughter, *Investigation into allegation of Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for an extended period of time is unfounded. Based on the interview with the R1,S1, S2, R1’s daughter R 1 was eating See’s Famous Old Time Candies (chocolate) and while he was eating the chocolate dropped on his cloths, not soiled but it was stain with chocolate. (Photo of the See’s Famous Old Time Candies provided) Unfounded *Investigation into allegation of Facility staff do not assist resident with transfers out of bed is unfounded. Interview of staff, R1’s Son and daughter and R 1 staff was assisting resident with transfer out of bed. Specially R 1 stated that S1 always help him. R 1’s daughter stated that Her father R1 going on has 3rd month of hospice care at Iris Guest Home on Berkeley. They were given 2 to 3 weeks of life for her father. At this facility he has improved so much.. Not only in health but mentally. He is happy at the facility. R 1 also stated that he is getting good care at the facility. *Investigation into allegation of facility staff are not providing resident with an adequate quality of food is unfounded. Interview of the staff and reviews of Admission Agreement, Physician’s report R1 was on liquid diet. R 1 has no dentures, no teeth. He was on soft diet as he chokes when swallowing. R 1 and R1’s daughter said that facility providing food according to R1’s needs. This agency has investigated the complaint and is determined to be UNFOUNDED. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegations of Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for an extended period of time facility staff do not assist resident with transfers out of bed, Facility staff are not providing resident with an adequate quality and quantity of food were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2021 · control 22-AS-20200921101517
Sep 9, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to access resident for injuries. Facility staff were not aware of resident's whereabouts on multiple occasions. Resident AWOL from the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shobhana Frank made an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA Frank met with Administrator Brevet Dao and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the inves5tigation, LPA interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as Physician’s Report dated 09/16/20, Admission Agreement dated 9/16/20, Vitas Hospice care Medication list dated 10/01/20, Doctor’s note dated 10/7/21, Vitas Hospice Care visit list, LPA interviewed Staff 1 (S1) Staff 2 (S2) Resident 1 and Vitas nurse. Investigation into allegation Facility staff failed to access resident for injuries is unfounded. Based on interview and reviews of Physician’s report dated 9/16/21 R 1 had imbalance of gate. On 10/8/20 she (R1) was outside on patio she fall and scratch her knee. Licensee and Vitas care hospice nurse observed the incident and Vitas nurse provided first aid to R1. R 1 had bruises on both her knees and a swollen right ankle Next day licensee checked her knees and it was bruised. R1 did not complaint having any pain or discomfort. Unfounded Investigation into allegation Facility staff were not aware of resident's whereabouts on multiple occasions is unfounded. Based on interview of R1, S1 and S 2. S 1 reported that yes, on 10/7/20 only one time R 1 went out to the store. He went right away and bring her back to the facility. After the incident licensee requested Doctor’s note indicates that R 1 not to leave the facility unassisted. Investigation into allegation Resident AWOL from the facility is unfounded. Based on the interview of S1, S 2 and R1. R1 reported that She loves to sit by her patio area or side of the home and read her Christian book, drink coffee and smoke as permitted. She After 10/7/20 (R1) did not AWOL from the facility. This agency has investigated the complaint and is determined to be UNFOUNDED. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegations of Facility staff failed to access resident for injuries, Facility staff were not aware of resident's whereabouts on multiple occasions and Resident AWOL from the facility were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2021 · control 22-AS-20201009131947
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 2, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Iris 8 LLC, licensed since 2020.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 61
- Total complaints
- 23
- Substantiated allegations
- 40
- Type A citations
- 15
- Type B citations
- 22
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 15 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 22 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 40 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 23 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Iris Guest Home
Is Iris Guest Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
How many residents is Iris Guest Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Has Iris Guest Home been cited?
15 Type A and 22 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. Those records count 61 state visits over the same years.
Is Iris Guest Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Iris Guest Home cost?
$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,300–$6,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in Orange that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,250 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Iris Guest Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Iris 8 LLC, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Orange County - Anaheim is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Iris Guest Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Iris Guest Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “IRIS GUEST HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #306005722. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Iris 8 LLC, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- 61 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- 15 Type A and 22 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. The same records count 61 state visits in that period.
- 23 complaints and 40 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Orange County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Orange County