Citrus Hills Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange, Orange County, California — state license #306005603, licensed for 95 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 54 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

17 homes in view

Citrus Hills Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 95 residents · Orange, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005603, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
142 S Prospect St · Orange, Orange County
Phone
(714) 639-3590
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 95 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 95 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 64 times and filed 54 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 5, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 19, 2026
Occupancy at the January 22, 2025 visit
85 of 95 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 12, 2022 to January 22, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unfounded” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 39 of 54 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 9 documents
Jun 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 8 documents
Oct 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately had resident sign documents without authorized representative knowledge. Licensee has changed residents' health insurance for financial gain.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on October 28, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Clinical Director (CD) Angelica Perez Penate. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging staff inappropriately had resident sign documents without authorized representative knowledge. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews with residents, Resident 1 (R1) reported that he signed his health insurance documents with his consent. Per R1 he switched to a better insurance. Per R3 he signs his own documents and reported that he has not changed his health insurance. During the course of the interviews with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that the residents chose their new insurance and stated that the facility is here to protect the residents' Health and Safety. During the couthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241028095754
202415 state visits · 20 documents
Dec 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have hot water

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannouced visit to conduct a 10 day visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Cindy Mora and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Charles Marinko arrived shortly after. The Department received a complaint that alleged the facility does not have hot water. During the visit LPA Mendivil toured the faciltiy with Maintenance Director Jesse Chrisman. LPA observed water tanks on the roof the facility. In addtion, LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that the facility does not have hot water, the investigation revealved the following: LPA Mendivil tested 2 out of 4 Spa Restrooms which contains 2 sinks and a shower, the other 2 spa bathrooms were occupied. Spa Bathroom on the first floor by Room 106 tested at 125 degrees for both sinks and 106 for the shower. Spa bathroom located on the second floor by room 217 the sinks tested at 119 degrees andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 24, 2024 · control 22-AS-20241223142646
Dec 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent outbreak of bedbugs. Staff damaged and did not return resident’s personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on September 10, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Charlie Marinko. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not prevent outbreak of bedbugs and staff damaged and did not return resident’s personal belongings. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on April 29, 2022. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated April 29, 2022 for R1. Per Physician report R1’s diagnosis is Lumbar stenosis. Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent outbreak of bedbugs, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Terminix Commercial invoices dated January 30, 2024, to July 03, 2024. Per Terminix Commercial invoice during these visits Terminix conducted a generalthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240910121745
Nov 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care Facility staff did not notify resident's physician about changes in resident's condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as hospice records. Regarding the allegations that facility staff did not notify resident's physician about changes in resident's condition and resident sustained pressure injuries while in care, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 04/06/2019 with an initial hospice admission on 12/25/2020 for protein calorie malnutrition. Resident re-certified for hospice 03/17/2021. Hospice records and physician report dated 03/30/2021 indicated resident had multiple skin tears. Hospice documentation shows resident was being seen multiple times a week fromthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024 · control 22-AS-20210623133139
Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly trained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as training records. Regarding the allegation that staff are not properly trained, the investigation revealed the following: LPA reviewed training records for Staff 1 (S1). LPA observed required training hours including required medication training. Based on record review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility representative. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024 · control 22-AS-20211105101618
Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not providing a clean and sanitary environment for residents in care. Facility staff are not ensuring that resident grab bars are safe for residents in care. Facility staff are not keeping the facility free of insects.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. and Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegations and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Receptionist Cindy Mora. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Itzayana Barba Aguirre was notified by staff via telephone. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff are not providing a clean and sanitary environment for residents in care, facility staff are not ensuring that resident grab bars are safe for residents in care and facility staff are not keeping the facility free of insects. Regarding the allegations, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews six of eight individuals interviewed denied that staff are not providing a clean and sanitary environment for residents in care. During the course of the interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240925145424
Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not provide nutrious, well balanced meals.

Regarding the allegation: Facility does not provide nutritious, well balanced meals. 10 of 10 individuals interviewed were unable to corroborate the complaint allegation. All the residents interviewed know they have an alternative menu available to them and if they don’t like whats being served they can request something else. 3 of the residents interviewed stated if they don’t want what the kitchen is serving, they will go and buy themselves something to eat, and all three of the residents who made that statement are aware they can order off the alternative menu as well.1 resident that was interviewed said, the food is terrible, but said it’s not the staff’s fault, they do the best they can. It’s the material they use. Staff 2 (S2) explained how the alternative menu works and stated 10:30 am is the cut off time for lunch and 3:30 is the cut off time for dinner. S2 stated it’s easy to prepare something for breakfast, but if the resident wants something like a breakfast burrito, they nethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240820120724
Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is allowing Residents to smoke in non-designated smoking areas.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to investigation a complaint received August 20, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit before entering the facility. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, document review and observation. Regarding the allegation: Facility is allowing Residents to smoke in non-designated smoking areas. 3 of 10 individuals confirmed the complaint allegation, including one resident who admitted to smoking outside on the patio area outside the resident’s room. The resident stated they never smoke inside the room. During the interview the resident walked outside to shoe LPA Haley where the resident smokes at. While on the patio, LPA Haley observed several cigarette butts in two different areas on the patio. Photos were taken. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240820120724
Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Ryan Mims the maintenance supervisor and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. It was alleged that the facility got rid of Resident 1's (R1) clothes without their approval or knowledge. R1 reported that his clothes went missing around the time he went to the hospital and when he returned his clothes were gone. The Administrator reported that staff was told to wash the clothes. The maintenance supervisor reported that he told housekeeping to wash the residents' clothes in hot water and then to return them to the residents. The maintenance supervisor reported that they do not know what housekeeping did with the clothes. LPA verified on the facility visit on June 6, 2024 that R1 did not have any clothes in their room. Resident 2 (R2) reported that staff told him thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240530105511
Jun 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility was kept free of bedbugs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Itzyzna Aguirre and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation staff did not ensure the facility was kept free of bed bugs revealed the following. It was alleged that the facility did not address the issue of bed bugs being present in resident rooms at the facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents at the facility. LPA and the Administrator toured the facility. LPA did not observe any bed bugs or any insects in the facility or the rooms that were alleged to have bed bugs. On May 1, 2024 Resident 1 (R1) reported they saw bed bugs in their room. The maintenance director reported they were notified about the bed bugs on May 1, 2024 and they called the pest control company to the facility to treat the room. A review of facility records shows that the room in qthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240530105511
May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on February 23, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with receptionist Cindy Mora. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on July 28, 2023. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated July 27, 2023 for R1. Per Physician report R1 is able to communicate their needs. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Unusual Incident/Injury Report (UIIR) dated January 17, 2024 for R1. Per UIIR on January 12, 2024 R1 had an unwitnessed fall and R1 was helped up. Per UIIR wound care was completed on R1's skin tear. During the course of the interviews with residents, R1 reported that she has not had a fall that made her headthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240223130422
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident with meeting medical needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on February 23, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with receptionist Cindy Mora. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff do not assist resident with meeting medical needs. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on September 27, 2022. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated March 27, 2024 for R1. Per Physician report R1's diagnoses are hemiplegia and bullous pemphigoid. Per the Mayo Clinic bullous pemphigoid is defined as a rare skin condition that causes large, fluid filled blister. During the course of the interviews with witnesses, Witness 1 (W1) reported that during an assessment on April 4th, 2024 that she did not noticed boils all over R1's body. During the course of the interviews with residents, R2 reported ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240223161833
Mar 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff who are not skilled professionals are performing glucose testing on resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration record. Regarding the allegation that facility staff who are not skilled professionals are performing glucose testing on resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) requires glucose testing. Physician report dated 08/31/2022 indicated resident is able to manage medications as well as perform own glucose testing. However, two out of three med techs as well as resident confirm staff is assisting with glucose testing. Staff are not appropriately skilled professionals. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240129094914
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident eloped due to staff negligence

On this Day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Wellness Director Yairell Garica and explained the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint on 08/02/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 08/11/2023. During the course of the visit LPA Mendivil interviewed residents and staff and obtained copies of pertinent records. Regarding the allegation resident eloped due to staff negligence, the investigation revealed the following: Based on interviews with Staff 1 (S1) Resident 1 (R1) had made it out of the facility shortly after R1 had been admitted to the facility. After this incident R1 was given a wander guard which would sound an alarm if the R1 was to leave the building. Per review of a LIC 624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 08/07/2023 Cont on LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230802103141
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints13typical 2
Total complaints36typical 7
State visits on file64typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026690202568020241520420231314420222412021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 639-3590

Is Citrus Hills Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Citrus Hills Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange (Orange County): California license #306005603, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 95 residents. State records list 54 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 5, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Citrus Hills Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Citrus Hills Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 95 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Citrus Hills Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Citrus Hills Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Citrus Hills Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Citrus Hills Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

85 of 95 beds occupied (89%) when the state visited on January 22, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Citrus Hills Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 64 state visits and 54 dated documents since 2021 for Citrus Hills Assisted Living; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 22, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately had resident sign documents without authorized representative knowledge. Licensee has changed residents' health insurance for financial gain.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on October 28, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Clinical Director (CD) Angelica Perez Penate. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging staff inappropriately had resident sign documents without authorized representative knowledge. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews with residents, Resident 1 (R1) reported that he signed his health insurance documents with his consent. Per R1 he switched to a better insurance. Per R3 he signs his own documents and reported that he has not changed his health insurance. During the course of the interviews with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that the residents chose their new insurance and stated that the facility is here to protect the residents' Health and Safety. During the couCDSS inspection report, January 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241028095754

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have hot water
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannouced visit to conduct a 10 day visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Cindy Mora and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Charles Marinko arrived shortly after. The Department received a complaint that alleged the facility does not have hot water. During the visit LPA Mendivil toured the faciltiy with Maintenance Director Jesse Chrisman. LPA observed water tanks on the roof the facility. In addtion, LPA Mendivil interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that the facility does not have hot water, the investigation revealved the following: LPA Mendivil tested 2 out of 4 Spa Restrooms which contains 2 sinks and a shower, the other 2 spa bathrooms were occupied. Spa Bathroom on the first floor by Room 106 tested at 125 degrees for both sinks and 106 for the shower. Spa bathroom located on the second floor by room 217 the sinks tested at 119 degrees andCDSS inspection report, December 24, 2024 · control 22-AS-20241223142646
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent outbreak of bedbugs. Staff damaged and did not return resident’s personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on September 10, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Charlie Marinko. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not prevent outbreak of bedbugs and staff damaged and did not return resident’s personal belongings. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on April 29, 2022. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated April 29, 2022 for R1. Per Physician report R1’s diagnosis is Lumbar stenosis. Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent outbreak of bedbugs, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Terminix Commercial invoices dated January 30, 2024, to July 03, 2024. Per Terminix Commercial invoice during these visits Terminix conducted a generalCDSS inspection report, December 11, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240910121745
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained pressure injuries while in care Facility staff did not notify resident's physician about changes in resident's condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as hospice records. Regarding the allegations that facility staff did not notify resident's physician about changes in resident's condition and resident sustained pressure injuries while in care, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 04/06/2019 with an initial hospice admission on 12/25/2020 for protein calorie malnutrition. Resident re-certified for hospice 03/17/2021. Hospice records and physician report dated 03/30/2021 indicated resident had multiple skin tears. Hospice documentation shows resident was being seen multiple times a week fromCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2024 · control 22-AS-20210623133139
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly trained
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as training records. Regarding the allegation that staff are not properly trained, the investigation revealed the following: LPA reviewed training records for Staff 1 (S1). LPA observed required training hours including required medication training. Based on record review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility representative. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2024 · control 22-AS-20211105101618
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not providing a clean and sanitary environment for residents in care. Facility staff are not ensuring that resident grab bars are safe for residents in care. Facility staff are not keeping the facility free of insects.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. and Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegations and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Receptionist Cindy Mora. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Itzayana Barba Aguirre was notified by staff via telephone. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff are not providing a clean and sanitary environment for residents in care, facility staff are not ensuring that resident grab bars are safe for residents in care and facility staff are not keeping the facility free of insects. Regarding the allegations, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews six of eight individuals interviewed denied that staff are not providing a clean and sanitary environment for residents in care. During the course of the interviewCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240925145424
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not provide nutrious, well balanced meals.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Regarding the allegation: Facility does not provide nutritious, well balanced meals. 10 of 10 individuals interviewed were unable to corroborate the complaint allegation. All the residents interviewed know they have an alternative menu available to them and if they don’t like whats being served they can request something else. 3 of the residents interviewed stated if they don’t want what the kitchen is serving, they will go and buy themselves something to eat, and all three of the residents who made that statement are aware they can order off the alternative menu as well.1 resident that was interviewed said, the food is terrible, but said it’s not the staff’s fault, they do the best they can. It’s the material they use. Staff 2 (S2) explained how the alternative menu works and stated 10:30 am is the cut off time for lunch and 3:30 is the cut off time for dinner. S2 stated it’s easy to prepare something for breakfast, but if the resident wants something like a breakfast burrito, they neCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240820120724
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is allowing Residents to smoke in non-designated smoking areas.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made unannounced visit to investigation a complaint received August 20, 2024. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit before entering the facility. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, document review and observation. Regarding the allegation: Facility is allowing Residents to smoke in non-designated smoking areas. 3 of 10 individuals confirmed the complaint allegation, including one resident who admitted to smoking outside on the patio area outside the resident’s room. The resident stated they never smoke inside the room. During the interview the resident walked outside to shoe LPA Haley where the resident smokes at. While on the patio, LPA Haley observed several cigarette butts in two different areas on the patio. Photos were taken. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240820120724
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Ryan Mims the maintenance supervisor and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. It was alleged that the facility got rid of Resident 1's (R1) clothes without their approval or knowledge. R1 reported that his clothes went missing around the time he went to the hospital and when he returned his clothes were gone. The Administrator reported that staff was told to wash the clothes. The maintenance supervisor reported that he told housekeeping to wash the residents' clothes in hot water and then to return them to the residents. The maintenance supervisor reported that they do not know what housekeeping did with the clothes. LPA verified on the facility visit on June 6, 2024 that R1 did not have any clothes in their room. Resident 2 (R2) reported that staff told him theCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240530105511
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure facility was kept free of bedbugs
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Itzyzna Aguirre and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation staff did not ensure the facility was kept free of bed bugs revealed the following. It was alleged that the facility did not address the issue of bed bugs being present in resident rooms at the facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents at the facility. LPA and the Administrator toured the facility. LPA did not observe any bed bugs or any insects in the facility or the rooms that were alleged to have bed bugs. On May 1, 2024 Resident 1 (R1) reported they saw bed bugs in their room. The maintenance director reported they were notified about the bed bugs on May 1, 2024 and they called the pest control company to the facility to treat the room. A review of facility records shows that the room in qCDSS inspection report, June 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240530105511
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on February 23, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with receptionist Cindy Mora. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on July 28, 2023. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated July 27, 2023 for R1. Per Physician report R1 is able to communicate their needs. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Unusual Incident/Injury Report (UIIR) dated January 17, 2024 for R1. Per UIIR on January 12, 2024 R1 had an unwitnessed fall and R1 was helped up. Per UIIR wound care was completed on R1's skin tear. During the course of the interviews with residents, R1 reported that she has not had a fall that made her headCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240223130422
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist resident with meeting medical needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on February 23, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with receptionist Cindy Mora. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff do not assist resident with meeting medical needs. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on September 27, 2022. Documents reviewed included the Physician Report (LIC602) dated March 27, 2024 for R1. Per Physician report R1's diagnoses are hemiplegia and bullous pemphigoid. Per the Mayo Clinic bullous pemphigoid is defined as a rare skin condition that causes large, fluid filled blister. During the course of the interviews with witnesses, Witness 1 (W1) reported that during an assessment on April 4th, 2024 that she did not noticed boils all over R1's body. During the course of the interviews with residents, R2 reported thCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240223161833
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff who are not skilled professionals are performing glucose testing on resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration record. Regarding the allegation that facility staff who are not skilled professionals are performing glucose testing on resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) requires glucose testing. Physician report dated 08/31/2022 indicated resident is able to manage medications as well as perform own glucose testing. However, two out of three med techs as well as resident confirm staff is assisting with glucose testing. Staff are not appropriately skilled professionals. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met,CDSS inspection report, February 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240129094914

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident eloped due to staff negligence
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this Day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Wellness Director Yairell Garica and explained the reason for the visit. The department received a complaint on 08/02/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 08/11/2023. During the course of the visit LPA Mendivil interviewed residents and staff and obtained copies of pertinent records. Regarding the allegation resident eloped due to staff negligence, the investigation revealed the following: Based on interviews with Staff 1 (S1) Resident 1 (R1) had made it out of the facility shortly after R1 had been admitted to the facility. After this incident R1 was given a wander guard which would sound an alarm if the R1 was to leave the building. Per review of a LIC 624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 08/07/2023 Cont on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230802103141
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure that resident received prescribed medication while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 05/15/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Operations Manager (OM) Itzayana Barba Aguirre. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff did not ensure that resident received prescribed medication while in care. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Eight of ten individuals interviewed reported that medications are always given and on time. As for the remaining two individuals, one individual confirmed the allegation and the other reported that they do not distribute medication. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Physician Report (LIC602A) dated 11/21/22 for Resident 1 (R1). Per Physician Report R1 is not ablCDSS inspection report, July 6, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230515083103
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to meet reporting requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegation listed above. On April 28, 2023, LPA conducted an initial investigation visit at the facility with the assistance of Citlalli Galeana, Wellness Coordinator. LPA obtained the facility's current census of 88 residents, the facility roster on an updated form LIC500, internal incident reports and Special Incident Reports transmitted to the Department for the months of March and April 2023, as well as the physician reports, service plans, needs assessments and plan of care print-outs for five current residents. Two staff interviews and three resident interviews were either conducted or attempted during the visit. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230426090325
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not ensure that resident received prescribed medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Health and Wellness Director Yairell Garcia and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation revealed the following. It was alleged that the facility did not have Resident 1's (R1) Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325MG (PRN) refilled timely and R1 did not have the PRN medication from 4/17/23 until the morning of 4/20/23 even though they requested the medication. Staff interviewed reported that the medication was ordered, the pharmacy and doctor were contacted. Staff reported that it takes time for a medication order to process and the medication must be approved by the resident's physician before a prescription is filled. A review of R1's medication administration record for April 2023 shows that R1 did not take any Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen from 4/16/23 to 4/19/23. R1 has resided at thCDSS inspection report, May 4, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230426173357
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was issued an unlawful eviction. Resident was physically attacked by another resident due to lack of care and supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on 03/15/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Operations Manager (OM) Itzayana Barba Aguirre and explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that resident was issued an unlawful eviction and resident was physically attacked by another resident due to lack of care and supervision. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Resident Handbook and House Rules. The Resident Behavior Code section under the Resident Handbook and House Rules states the following: “The following behaviors…may result in a 30-day notice of termination of your Residency Agreement: Residents must not be disruptive…and must not be phCDSS inspection report, April 6, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230315110649
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident was issued an unlawful eviction.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 02/02/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Wellness Coordinator (WC) Citlali Galeana and explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that resident was issued an unlawful eviction. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Five of eight individuals interviewed reported that Resident 1 (R1) got into a physical altercation with another resident on 01/29/23. Per Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 01/31/23 R1 “punched R2 with a closed fist on left side of face” during a verbal altercation in the dining room. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Resident Handbook and House Rules. The Resident Behavior Code section under the Resident HandbooCDSS inspection report, March 2, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230202112845
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff charged residents card without authorization. Staff yelled at resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegations. LPA Lyman was allowed entry into the facility and met with Operations Manager (OM) Itzy Barba and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as credit card authorization statement and admission agreement. Regarding the allegation that facility staff charged residents card without authorization and staff yelled at resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) signed an authorization for recurring automated credit card payment for rent. Signed authorization indicates agreement to deduct rent on the 1st day of each month. Staff 1 (S1) indicates verbal agreement for card authorization on the 4th day of the month as a courtesy to R1. On Saturday, February 4, 2023, R1's card was authoCDSS inspection report, February 16, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230210113449
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staff to meet the needs of residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 01/12/23. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and initially met with Wellness Coordinator (WC) Citlali Galeana. Operations Manager (OM) Itzanaya Barba Aguirre and Wellness Director Yairell Garcia arrived shortly after. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility does not have enough staff to meet resident's needs. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Five of eight residents interviewed reported being satisfied with staff and expressed that staff are “courteous” and “attentive.” One of the remaining three residents reported hearing complaints of dissatisfaction with staff services from fellow residents. The remaining two residentsCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230112164247
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are violating House Rules by smoking marijuana and cigarettes inside of the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. and Patricia Velazquez conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegation and to deliver the findings of the allegation. LPAs Ramirez and Velazquez were allowed entry into the facility and initially met with Medication Technician Sarah Tanner and explained the purpose of the visit. Operations Manager Itzayana Barba Aguirre arrived later to assist with the visit. On today's visit LPAs Ramirez and Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPAs also reviewed and obtained copies of facility, resident and staff records. During the course of the investigation the following was revealed: LPAs Ramirez and Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. During the resident interviews LPAs observed a cigarette on a small table next to Resident (R) #1's bed that was lit and smoke emanating from the cigarette. As LPAs were entering R1's room, R1 immediately disCDSS inspection report, January 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230112164247
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not provide a safe environment for resident Lack of supervision resulted in resident wandering into another resident's room
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation into the above allegations. LPA Velazquez was allowed entry into the facility and met with Operations Manager Itzayana Barba Aguirre and explained the purpose of the visit. On today's visit LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with staff. During the course of the investigation, LPAs Ruth Martinez, Rosie Quiroz and Patricia Velazquez conducted interviews with the complainant, residents, and staff. LPAs Quiroz and Velazquez obtained facility, resident, and staff records. The records reviewed included Resident Admission Records, Physician's Reports, Service Plans, an Unusual Incident Report for Resident (R) #1 for an incident that occurred on May 31, 2020, Medication Review Reports, Resident Progress Notes and R1's Death Report. Regarding the allegation: Facility does not provide a safe environment for resident, during the course of the investigCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 22-AS-20200506165246

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 64 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
13
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
36
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
64
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 639-3590
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Citrus Hills Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.