Pacifica Senior Living South Coast is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Costa Mesa, Orange County, California — state license #306005272, licensed for 98 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated July 10, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Pacifica Senior Living South Coast

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 98 residents · Costa Mesa, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005272, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2619 Orange Ave · Costa Mesa, Orange County
Phone
(949) 515-0121
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 98 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 98 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, COSTA MESA OPERATIONS, LLC, EFFECTIVE 11/01/2024.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated July 10, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 10, 2026
Occupancy at the May 26, 2026 visit
69 of 98 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 13 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 18, 2023 to May 26, 2026. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 13 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure medication was stored locked and inaccessible to residents Staff did not dispense medications to residents as prescribed Unqualified staff administer injections to residents

On May 26, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Executive Director Yaylene Mazariegos was present and also assisted on today's visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident and interviewed staff. LPA also reviewed and obtained pertinent documents to this complaint such as resident records, including medication administration records. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure medication was stored locked and inaccessible to residents, the following has been concluded: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility's medication room and ten resident bedrooms. During a tour of Resident #1 (R1's) bedroom, R1 disclosed that she stores her insulin injection in her refrigerator. LPA then observed an insulin injection pen to be stored in R1's refrigethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260316142102
May 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not bring the change in cognitive functions to the resident’s physician.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged facility did not bring the change in cognitive functions to the resident’s physician. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff and resident in care. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation facility did not bring the change in cognitive functions to the resident’s physician, it was reported the facility did not seek an updated physician’s report for Resident (R1) with a current diagnosis. Interview with R1 stated they have seen their primary care physician (PCP) a couple of times since their readmission to the facility on February 27, 2026. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260320094728
May 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not abiding to the admission agreement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged staff are not abiding to the admission agreement. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff and resident in care. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff are not abiding to the admission agreement, it was reported resident 1 (R1) was informed rent is going to increase on January 1, 2026. LPA interview with Admininstrator (AD) Yaylene Mazariegos stated a rate increase letter was issued and provided to R1 on October 22, 2025. LPA interview with R1 stated they received a copy of the rate increase letter. LPA record review revealed R1's admission agreement states on page 11 "We shall give ninety (90) days' prior written notice to you of any change in the Base Monthlthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251104160452
Jul 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate staffing. Facility does not provide adequate hygiene supplies.

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an uannnouced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the faciliy by Executive Director Yaylene Mazariegos and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received the complaint on 03/13/2025 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 03/21/2025. LPA Mendivil toured facility and interviewed residents and staff. LPA obtained copies of staff schedule and resident roster. Regarding the allegations facility does not have adequate staffing and facility does not provide adequate hygiene supplies the investigation revealed the following: The facility is licensed for 98 residents and currently has a census of 18 residents in assisted living and 16 residents in memory care. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250313151337
Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff prevented resident's medical professional from caring for resident. Facility did not provide resident's authorized representative with written refund policy in a timely manner.

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met Executive Director (ED) Yaylene Mazariegos. It is alleged staff prevented Resident 1’s (R1’s) medical professional from caring for R1. Inteviews were conducted with four facility residents, one witness, and R1’s Responsible Party (RP). R1 could not be interviewed as they have since passed away. During their interview, R1’s medical professional, Witness 1 (W1) stated they were never denied visitation or access to R1 by the facility or its' staff, and stated the facility staff was very receptive during the time they cared for R1. During their inteview, R1's RP denied having any knowledge of staff preventing R1's medical professional from caring for R1. During today’s visit, four additional facility residents were interviewed; four of four residents denied staff preventing medical professionals from caring for them, (Cont.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20210125155304
Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not safeguard resident's cellphone which led to its theft. Facility did not follow their theft and loss policy regarding the theft of resident's cellphone

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Yaylene Mazariegos, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegations. The investigation into the allegations that facility did not safeguard resident's cellphone which led to its theft and the facility did not follow their theft and loss policy regarding the theft of resident's cellphone revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, staff, and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and Resident #1’s (R1) Admission Agreement. CONTINUED Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220308092622
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following infection control protocols. Facility staff are not properly trained. Facility does not provide activities to residents. Lack of care and supervision. Facility is understaffed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings for the complaint received on 9/27/2023. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, was greeted by Community Relations Director (CRD) Kimberly Melendez and Business Office Manager (BOM) Yesenia Castro. Facility administrator was unable to be present during today’s visit. It was alleged that facility is not following infection control protocols. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 9 interviews, of which all 6 resident interviews, and all 3 staff interviews did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that the facility does follow infection control protocols. During the tour of the physical plant of the facility, LPA De Perio observed that the facility has an adequate supply of PPE such as disinfectants, gowns, masks and gloves. Per documentation review, the facility has an Infection Control Plan that is implemented and utilized if a resident has tested posthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230927162232
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints12typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file32typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265512025881202422020236712022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 515-0121

Is Pacifica Senior Living South Coast licensed?

Yes — Pacifica Senior Living South Coast is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Costa Mesa (Orange County): California license #306005272, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 98 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated July 10, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Pacifica Senior Living South Coast care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Pacifica Senior Living South Coast with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 98 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, COSTA MESA OPERATIONS, LLC, EFFECTIVE 11/01/2024.

How much does Pacifica Senior Living South Coast cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Pacifica Senior Living South Coast's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Pacifica Senior Living South Coast accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Pacifica Senior Living South Coast is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

69 of 98 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on May 26, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Pacifica Senior Living South Coast?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2022 for Pacifica Senior Living South Coast; 13 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 26, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

13 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure medication was stored locked and inaccessible to residents Staff did not dispense medications to residents as prescribed Unqualified staff administer injections to residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On May 26, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Executive Director Yaylene Mazariegos was present and also assisted on today's visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident and interviewed staff. LPA also reviewed and obtained pertinent documents to this complaint such as resident records, including medication administration records. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure medication was stored locked and inaccessible to residents, the following has been concluded: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility's medication room and ten resident bedrooms. During a tour of Resident #1 (R1's) bedroom, R1 disclosed that she stores her insulin injection in her refrigerator. LPA then observed an insulin injection pen to be stored in R1's refrigeCDSS inspection report, May 26, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260316142102
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not bring the change in cognitive functions to the resident’s physician.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged facility did not bring the change in cognitive functions to the resident’s physician. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff and resident in care. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation facility did not bring the change in cognitive functions to the resident’s physician, it was reported the facility did not seek an updated physician’s report for Resident (R1) with a current diagnosis. Interview with R1 stated they have seen their primary care physician (PCP) a couple of times since their readmission to the facility on February 27, 2026. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260320094728

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not abiding to the admission agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged staff are not abiding to the admission agreement. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff and resident in care. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff are not abiding to the admission agreement, it was reported resident 1 (R1) was informed rent is going to increase on January 1, 2026. LPA interview with Admininstrator (AD) Yaylene Mazariegos stated a rate increase letter was issued and provided to R1 on October 22, 2025. LPA interview with R1 stated they received a copy of the rate increase letter. LPA record review revealed R1's admission agreement states on page 11 "We shall give ninety (90) days' prior written notice to you of any change in the Base MonthlCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251104160452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate staffing. Facility does not provide adequate hygiene supplies.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an uannnouced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the faciliy by Executive Director Yaylene Mazariegos and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received the complaint on 03/13/2025 and LPA Mendivil conducted the initial 10 day visit on 03/21/2025. LPA Mendivil toured facility and interviewed residents and staff. LPA obtained copies of staff schedule and resident roster. Regarding the allegations facility does not have adequate staffing and facility does not provide adequate hygiene supplies the investigation revealed the following: The facility is licensed for 98 residents and currently has a census of 18 residents in assisted living and 16 residents in memory care. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250313151337
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff prevented resident's medical professional from caring for resident. Facility did not provide resident's authorized representative with written refund policy in a timely manner.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met Executive Director (ED) Yaylene Mazariegos. It is alleged staff prevented Resident 1’s (R1’s) medical professional from caring for R1. Inteviews were conducted with four facility residents, one witness, and R1’s Responsible Party (RP). R1 could not be interviewed as they have since passed away. During their interview, R1’s medical professional, Witness 1 (W1) stated they were never denied visitation or access to R1 by the facility or its' staff, and stated the facility staff was very receptive during the time they cared for R1. During their inteview, R1's RP denied having any knowledge of staff preventing R1's medical professional from caring for R1. During today’s visit, four additional facility residents were interviewed; four of four residents denied staff preventing medical professionals from caring for them, (Cont.CDSS inspection report, March 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20210125155304
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not safeguard resident's cellphone which led to its theft. Facility did not follow their theft and loss policy regarding the theft of resident's cellphone
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Yaylene Mazariegos, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegations. The investigation into the allegations that facility did not safeguard resident's cellphone which led to its theft and the facility did not follow their theft and loss policy regarding the theft of resident's cellphone revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, staff, and residents, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and Resident #1’s (R1) Admission Agreement. CONTINUED UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220308092622

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following infection control protocols. Facility staff are not properly trained. Facility does not provide activities to residents. Lack of care and supervision. Facility is understaffed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings for the complaint received on 9/27/2023. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, was greeted by Community Relations Director (CRD) Kimberly Melendez and Business Office Manager (BOM) Yesenia Castro. Facility administrator was unable to be present during today’s visit. It was alleged that facility is not following infection control protocols. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 9 interviews, of which all 6 resident interviews, and all 3 staff interviews did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that the facility does follow infection control protocols. During the tour of the physical plant of the facility, LPA De Perio observed that the facility has an adequate supply of PPE such as disinfectants, gowns, masks and gloves. Per documentation review, the facility has an Infection Control Plan that is implemented and utilized if a resident has tested posCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230927162232
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to provide refund to responsible party.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by executive director (ED) Stacie Anderson. It was alleged that facility failed to provide refund to responsible party. LPA conducted a total of 6 interviews and pertinent record reviews. An interview conducted stated that the process of issuing the refund to the resident (R1) responsible party (RP) had already been initiated. Per record review, the facility mailed out the refunded check on 07/20/23, and ED Anderson contacted R1's RP on 07/21/23 to inform about the status of the refund, to which RP acknowledged. On 07/31/23, RP of R1 confirmed and verified that the refund from the facility had been received. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 2, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230710105551
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThe facility failed to provide care and supervision to resident resulting in death
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Velazquez was greeted, granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Stacie Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation interviews were conducted with the Resident (R) 1’s family member, R1's responsible party, R1’s physician, facility staff, and residents. During the course of the investigation facility records were obtained and reviewed as well as hospital medical records. The facility records reviewed for R1 included an Admission Agreement, Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare documents signed by resident, Physician's Orders for medications dated March 31, 2022, Admission Orders dated January 31, 2022 Physician's Report with date of exam documented as 12/21/2021, Need and Services Plan dated January 27, 2022, ResiCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220531161434
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident had a comfortable environment Resident's food is served cold Staff did not notify responsible party of incident Resident received unauthorized services
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA Velazquez met with Executive Director Stacie Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. On today's visit LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also requested copies of facility and resident records. During the course of the investigation the following was revealed. LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also reviewed and obtained copies of facility and resident records. The records reviewed included Resident Face Sheets, Identification and Emergency Information, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Admission Orders, Needs and Services Plan, Physician's Reports, Facility Internal Incident Report, Fax communication from the facility to Bi Rite Pharmacy, Medication Administration Records, a copy of text communication between Resident (R) #1's family member and the facility rCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230418134043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted an unannounced initial 10 day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegation and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA Velazquez was allowed entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Stacie Anderson. On today's visit LPA Velazquez reviewed and obtained copies of facility and resident records. LPA Velazquez also conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez reviewed resident records which included Face Sheets, Physician's Reports, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Needs and Services Plans, Power of Attorney documents, Resident Assessments, Medication Sheets, and an Admissions Agreement. At 10:35 AM LPA Velazquez along with Resident Care Director Jennifer Thompson, L.V.N. conducted a review of medications for 3 residents. LPA Velazquez and RCD Thompson observed the following for Resident (R) #1: Myrbetriq ER 25 mg was listed on the Medication Sheet but the mediCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230418134043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident suffered from dehydration while in care Resident fell while in care Resident is not provided a comfortable temperature Facility does not have adequate drinking supplies Staff are not following posted activities schedule
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings into the above allegations. LPA Velazquez was allowed entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Stacie Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. On today's visit LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also reviewed and requested copies of facility and resident records. During the course of the investigation the following was revealed: LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also reviewed and obtained copies of facility and resident records. The records reviewed included Resident Face Sheets, Physician's Reports, Internal Incident Reports, Needs and Services Plans, Resident Narrative Charting Notes, Resident Assessments, Activities Calendars, pictures of various activities dated October 2022 - February 2023 where residents have participated that have been posted on the faCDSS inspection report, March 9, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220913103113
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacilities elevator's permit is expired
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio made an unannounced visit to this facility. LPA De Perio met with Memory Care Director Jennifer Thompson and stated the purpose of this visit which was to deliver the final findings for the complaint received on 11/7/22 against this facility. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facilities elevator's permit is expired. LPA De Perio conducted interviews and record reviews, of which all stated that facility has contacted the city for a permit renewal, however per city council, there is a backlog of renewing the elevator permits. Facility conducts monthly maintenance checks for elevators, of which all inspections dated from March 2022 to December 2022 have been passed. Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of documents obtained, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidenCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221107103548

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
32
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 515-0121
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Pacifica Senior Living South Coast? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.