Newport Beach Memory Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Newport Beach, Orange County, California — state license #306005154, licensed for 42 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Newport Beach Memory Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 42 residents · Newport Beach, CA · Orange County
LicensedMemory careHospiceWheelchair not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005154, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1000 Halyard · Newport Beach, Orange County
Phone
(949) 220-9700
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR FOURTY-TWO (42) NON-AMBULATORIES. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR FIFTEEN (15) RESIDENTS. APPROVED FOR DELAY EGRESS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 15, 2026
Occupancy at the March 10, 2026 visit
25 of 42 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 5, 2022 to March 10, 2026. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medications to residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA spoke with Maria Constantin, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, resident file review, interviews conducted, and copies of pertinent records. It is alleged that staff did not administer medication to residents in care, specifically to not having staff to hand out medication to residents. Record review revealed that facility has six medication techs on the schedule and there are at least two medication techs per shift. Interview with staff stated that Continue LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251208134641
Jan 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper care for scabies Staff are not following infectious control requirements

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Maria Constantin, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegations. The investigation into the allegations that staff did not provide proper care for scabies and staff are not following infectious control requirements revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD and witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) hospice medical records, Resident #2’s (R2) facility progress notes, R2’s medical records, and the facility’s infection control plan. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide proper care for scabies: it was alleged that a resident contracted scabies, the facility did not obtain proper assessment and treatment for the scabies, and thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251231093049
20251 state visit · 1 document
May 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide care and supervision resulting in multiple falls

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegation listed above and delivering findings to the licensee. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit took place on August 30, 2024. During the visit, LPA accompanied by facility staff toured the first floor of the facility as well as the unit where resident R1 is typically located. R1 was in the process of being discharged from the hospital after being sent out to be assessed on the morning of the visit due to a medical episode. LPA requested and reviewed resident and hospice records for R1 and interviewed one staff on duty. Additional witness interviews with hospice staff and R1's attorney-in-fact were conducted via telephone after the initial visit. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240823121915
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly safeguard confidential information

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Operations Manager Riley Bushman and explained the reason for the visit. LPA observed the See Something Say Something Poster posted in the entrance of the facility. LPA did not observe any confidential information at the front desk. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. It was reported that the facility census was left out in public view. LPA interviewed staff. LPA and Operations Manager toured the facility. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed had no knowledge of confidential information not being properly safeguarded or being left out in public view. During the tour of the facility LPA did not observe any Title 22 violations including confidential information not being safeguarded. Based on the information gathered the allegation, staff did not properly safeguard confidential informatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240329103030
Jan 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to ensure the safety of residents in care after admitting a new resident with behavior issues

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, witnesses, and observations made during the initial visit and the follow-up visit. Regarding the allegation: Facility failed to ensure the safety of residents in care after admitting a new resident with behavior issues. 5 of 5 staff members interviewed denied Resident 2 (R2) had behavior issues. During the investigation it was discovered that R2 does like to touch people and things around him; however, he has no intent to harm or hurt anyone. Staff 1 (1) said R2 doesn’t bother anyone and his touching is normal. Staff 2 (S2) Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240109140428
Jan 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility's staff is insufficient to adequately provide care and supervision to the residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, witnesses, and observations made during the initial visit on January 17, 2023 and today's follow up visit. Regarding the allegation: Facility's staff is insufficient to adequately provide care and supervision to the residents in care 5 of 5 staff interviews confirmed there is a need for additional staffing. During interviews it was discovered that there has been staffing issues. Caregivers have called off and quit before a scheduled shift without notice. Staff 4 (S4) said the staffing has gotten better and the help from the staffing agencies has Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240109140428
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: One of the facility's routes of egress is in disrepair

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the initial investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the facility's Operations Manager before listing the allegation. LPA accompanied by Operations Manager toured the facility's physical plant and the exits leading away from the ground level's living units. All doors observed are equipped with a digital pad used to disable the sound alarm in place to alert staff of the exit being used. Signage indicating delayed egress systems being in use is also observed on exit doors. There are two routes of egress leading from the memory care area on the first level using a delayed egress. Both have been tested during the visit, with the bar being pushed for the required amount of time and the corresponding sound alarm being witnessed locally and at a central console. The facility staff was unaware of the test being conthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230824164013
Aug 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility administrator does not have proper qualifications

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the facility's Operations Manager after stating the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on August 14, 2023. Following the resignation of former Executive Director S1, the licensee has designated S2 as the new Operations Manager for the facility. At the time of the initial visit, S2 is confirmed to not be in possession of an active Administrator certificate. Documentation provided during the present follow-up investigation visit demonstrated that S1 was on payroll for the facility until August 15, 2023 included. Starting August 16, 2023, an interim supervising administrator (S3) was named and was confirmed by LPA to be in possession of an active administrator certificate. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230809163155
Aug 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff does not have proper training to care for resident in care.

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the initial investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the facility's Operations Manager before listing the allegation. LPA requested and reviewed records for resident R1. The physician report based on an examination dated February 9, 2023 indicates that resident is diagnosed with dementia and has a colostomy bag installed. Due to the dementia diagnosis, the resident is not mentally and physically capable of providing all routine care for the ostomy. Following the resident's admission on May 28, 2023, the ostomy was attended to by skilled professionals under an admission with Apex Home Health. Following an incident with one of the providers sent by Apex, the resident was discharged from the service after July 15, 2023 and before August 10, 2023. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230814133520
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025110202445120236912022551
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 220-9700

Is Newport Beach Memory Care licensed?

Yes — Newport Beach Memory Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Newport Beach (Orange County): California license #306005154, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 42 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Newport Beach Memory Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Newport Beach Memory Care with clearances for dementia / memory care and hospice care; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR FOURTY-TWO (42) NON-AMBULATORIES. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR FIFTEEN (15) RESIDENTS. APPROVED FOR DELAY EGRESS.

How much does Newport Beach Memory Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Newport Beach Memory Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Newport Beach Memory Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Newport Beach Memory Care through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

25 of 42 beds occupied (60%) when the state visited on March 10, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Newport Beach Memory Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2022 for Newport Beach Memory Care; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 10, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer medications to residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA spoke with Maria Constantin, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, resident file review, interviews conducted, and copies of pertinent records. It is alleged that staff did not administer medication to residents in care, specifically to not having staff to hand out medication to residents. Record review revealed that facility has six medication techs on the schedule and there are at least two medication techs per shift. Interview with staff stated that Continue LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 10, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251208134641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide proper care for scabies Staff are not following infectious control requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Maria Constantin, discussed the purpose of the inspection, and explained the allegations. The investigation into the allegations that staff did not provide proper care for scabies and staff are not following infectious control requirements revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD and witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, Resident #1’s (R1) hospice medical records, Resident #2’s (R2) facility progress notes, R2’s medical records, and the facility’s infection control plan. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide proper care for scabies: it was alleged that a resident contracted scabies, the facility did not obtain proper assessment and treatment for the scabies, and theCDSS inspection report, January 7, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251231093049

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide care and supervision resulting in multiple falls
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegation listed above and delivering findings to the licensee. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit took place on August 30, 2024. During the visit, LPA accompanied by facility staff toured the first floor of the facility as well as the unit where resident R1 is typically located. R1 was in the process of being discharged from the hospital after being sent out to be assessed on the morning of the visit due to a medical episode. LPA requested and reviewed resident and hospice records for R1 and interviewed one staff on duty. Additional witness interviews with hospice staff and R1's attorney-in-fact were conducted via telephone after the initial visit. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240823121915
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly safeguard confidential information
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Operations Manager Riley Bushman and explained the reason for the visit. LPA observed the See Something Say Something Poster posted in the entrance of the facility. LPA did not observe any confidential information at the front desk. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. It was reported that the facility census was left out in public view. LPA interviewed staff. LPA and Operations Manager toured the facility. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed had no knowledge of confidential information not being properly safeguarded or being left out in public view. During the tour of the facility LPA did not observe any Title 22 violations including confidential information not being safeguarded. Based on the information gathered the allegation, staff did not properly safeguard confidential informatCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240329103030
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to ensure the safety of residents in care after admitting a new resident with behavior issues
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, witnesses, and observations made during the initial visit and the follow-up visit. Regarding the allegation: Facility failed to ensure the safety of residents in care after admitting a new resident with behavior issues. 5 of 5 staff members interviewed denied Resident 2 (R2) had behavior issues. During the investigation it was discovered that R2 does like to touch people and things around him; however, he has no intent to harm or hurt anyone. Staff 1 (1) said R2 doesn’t bother anyone and his touching is normal. Staff 2 (S2) Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240109140428
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility's staff is insufficient to adequately provide care and supervision to the residents in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, witnesses, and observations made during the initial visit on January 17, 2023 and today's follow up visit. Regarding the allegation: Facility's staff is insufficient to adequately provide care and supervision to the residents in care 5 of 5 staff interviews confirmed there is a need for additional staffing. During interviews it was discovered that there has been staffing issues. Caregivers have called off and quit before a scheduled shift without notice. Staff 4 (S4) said the staffing has gotten better and the help from the staffing agencies has Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240109140428

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedOne of the facility's routes of egress is in disrepair
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the initial investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the facility's Operations Manager before listing the allegation. LPA accompanied by Operations Manager toured the facility's physical plant and the exits leading away from the ground level's living units. All doors observed are equipped with a digital pad used to disable the sound alarm in place to alert staff of the exit being used. Signage indicating delayed egress systems being in use is also observed on exit doors. There are two routes of egress leading from the memory care area on the first level using a delayed egress. Both have been tested during the visit, with the bar being pushed for the required amount of time and the corresponding sound alarm being witnessed locally and at a central console. The facility staff was unaware of the test being conCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230824164013
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility administrator does not have proper qualifications
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the facility's Operations Manager after stating the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on August 14, 2023. Following the resignation of former Executive Director S1, the licensee has designated S2 as the new Operations Manager for the facility. At the time of the initial visit, S2 is confirmed to not be in possession of an active Administrator certificate. Documentation provided during the present follow-up investigation visit demonstrated that S1 was on payroll for the facility until August 15, 2023 included. Starting August 16, 2023, an interim supervising administrator (S3) was named and was confirmed by LPA to be in possession of an active administrator certificate. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230809163155
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not have proper training to care for resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting the initial investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by the facility's Operations Manager before listing the allegation. LPA requested and reviewed records for resident R1. The physician report based on an examination dated February 9, 2023 indicates that resident is diagnosed with dementia and has a colostomy bag installed. Due to the dementia diagnosis, the resident is not mentally and physically capable of providing all routine care for the ostomy. Following the resident's admission on May 28, 2023, the ostomy was attended to by skilled professionals under an admission with Apex Home Health. Following an incident with one of the providers sent by Apex, the resident was discharged from the service after July 15, 2023 and before August 10, 2023. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 17, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230814133520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is refusing to disclose information regarding the incident Facility did not report a fall that occurred to a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Director Michele Goodney and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and facility notes. Regarding the allegations that facility is refusing to disclose information regarding the incident and facility did not report a fall that occurred to a resident, the investigation revealed the following: On 10/06/2021, Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have an abrasion on right eye and complained of hip and leg pain. Facility notified responsible party of bruise and hip pain and physician ordered mobile X-ray per responsible party. Results of X-ray on 10/07/2021 indicated a right hip fracture and resident was sent out to Hoag Hospital. FacilityCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220223160724
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed/ Staff do not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care. 3/ Staff did not ensure that resident was provided their medication in a timely manner. 5/ Staff do not ensure that residents are provided with activities while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings in the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by administrator Michelle Goodney after explaining the purpose of the visit and listing the allegations. An initial visit was conducted on February 3, 2023. A tour of the physical plant was conducted with the administrator, and temperature measurements were taken. A sample of staff training records were reviewed. Staff schedules reviewed. Previous temperature measurements were taken during facility visits on January 4 and January 17, 2023. Seven additional staff interviews were conducted during an investigation visit for complaint reference #22-AS-20221228101134 on March 6, 2023. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230131162326
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are unable to communicate due to language barrier
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings into the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff. Administrator Michelle Goodney was notified of the visit and arrived later to assist. An initial visit was conducted on March 6, 2023. Staff schedule reviewed, staff interviews conducted. Based on documents reviewed and staff interviews, staff member S1 was confirmed to be present on the day reported in the initial complaint report. S1 was confirmed by interview to be fluent in English. The allegation is therefore Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed and left to facility representative. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230227164107
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed/ Facility heater units are in disrepair 3/ Facility is operating without an Administrator
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegatons listed above as well as to deliver findings to the licensee. An initial investigation visit was conducted at the facility on January 4, 2023. A tour of the physical plant was conducted with the administrator and a sample of units on both floors were observed. The room's individual thermostats and HVAC units were tested. Records were requested and reviewed, including the resident census, LIC500 Personnel Report (LIC500), staff schedule for a two-week period starting on November 27, 2022, staff payroll records and a sample of six resident files on record. A type B violation was documented as part of a case management visit the same day. LPA conducted a follow up visit on January 17, 2023 after additional concerns regarding staffing were brought to the attention of the Department. (CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C) SuCDSS inspection report, March 6, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221228101134

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 220-9700
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Newport Beach Memory Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.