Fullerton Villa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fullerton, Orange County, California — state license #306004839, licensed for 197 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Fullerton Villa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 197 residents · Fullerton, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306004839, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2441 W. Orangethorpe Ave. · Fullerton, Orange County
Phone
(714) 992-5380
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 196 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; 196 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 24 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 29, 2026
Occupancy at the February 18, 2026 visit
168 of 197 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2021 to February 18, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 18 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff administered medication to a resident without proper consent

On February 18, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegation listed above and to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Administrator (AD) Jae Wan Rim was present and assisted on today's visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted one staff interview, reviewed and obtained pertinent documents to the complaint. Regarding the allegation, staff administered medication to a resident without proper consent, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff administered medication to Resident #1 (R1) without proper consent. LPA reviewed R1's file including the admission agreement, medical assessment, pre-placement appraisal, resident appraisal, needs and services plan, and medication administration records. LPA observed there was no medical power of attorney on file for Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260213155556
20256 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Lack of care and supervision resulted in resident's decline. Facility did not notify responsible party of resident's change in condition. Facility denied the resident's right to reject medical care or other services. Facility did not ensure resident was provided 3 meals a day. Facility failed to provide basic hygiene items for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on July 11, 2023 by the Department. It was alleged staff lack of care and supervision resulted in resident’s decline, facility did not notify responsible party of resident’s change in condition, facility denied the resident’s right to reject medical care or other services, facility did not ensure resident was provided 3 meals a day, and facility failed to provide basic hygiene items for resident. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with residents in care and staff. LPA Arias reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation lack of care and supervision resulted in resident’s decline, it was reported resident 1 (R1)’s ability to express themselvethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230711165849
Nov 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to issue a refund after a resident moved out Facility staff failed to provide a healthful environment, resulting in a resident's hospitalization

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on February 15, 2024 by the Department. It was alleged staff facility failed to issue a refund after a resident moved out and facility staff failed to provide a healthful environment, resulting in a resident's hospitalization. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with residents in care and staff. LPA Arias reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation facility failed to issue a refund after a resident moved out, it was reported the facility did not provide a refund when resident 1 (R1) did not return to the facility after being hospitalized on January 3, 2024. Continued on LIC9099-C dated 10/23/2025 Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240207092654
Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not responding to resident's calls Staff not providing assistance to resident when brushing teeth

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation to the above identified complaint allegations. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted and granted entry. LPA spoke with Jae Wan Rim, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, and interviews conducted. It is alleged that staff not responding to residents’ calls. Interviews with 10 of 10 residents stated that when they call for help, they have always gotten the help they need, and staff come to help them all the time. They stated that they have waited about 10-15 minutes at a time, but they have not waited too long. Interview with staff stated that they get the call and the caregiver that is assigned to that area of the facility Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220712101114
Sep 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following resident's admission agreement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho arrived unannounced for the purpose to investigate into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator (Admin) Darlene Lindley, explained the reason for the visit, and discussed the elements of the allegation. On December 4, 2020, the Department received the complaint, and the 10-day investigation was initiated by LPA Lydia Martinez. LPA Martinez conducted the investigation via telephone and obtained the records via email due to the Coronavirus 2019 precautionary measures at that point in time. During today's visit, LPA Jessica Cho obtained addtional resident records and interviewed resident/staff. The following was revealed during the course of the investigation pertaining to Resident #1 (R1): It is alleged that the facility is not following the resident's admission agreement. In review of the parking fee notice dated November 10, 2020, the notice indicates effective December 10, 2020, there would be a fee of $100.00 for residents utilizinthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023 · control 22-AS-20201204161940
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not prevent the spread of scabies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to investigate the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley identified himself and explained the reason for the visit with staff. During the visit, staff lead a brief tour of the facility before interviews began. Regarding the allegation: Facility did not prevent the spread of scabies During the investigation, interviews were conducted with Administrator Darlene Lindley, staff members and residents. 5 individuals interviewed confirmed residents had scabies. 4 staff members interviewed confirmed residents had scabies in 2020. Staff 1 (S1) stated the scabies were treated right away. S1 claimed the facilities in house doctor prescribed cream to treat the residents who had scabies and their roommate, even if the roommate did not have scabies they were still treated. Staff 2 (S2) confirmed residents had scabies and said residents were treated with cream, isolated, rooms were sanitized, and cloths were separated and cleaned.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 22-AS-20200814090028
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries from a fall while in care Staff is threatening resident with eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the complaint received on 10/06/2020 and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by facility administrator (AD) Darlene Lindley and Assistant Administrator Jae Rim. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that resident sustained injuries from a fall while in care. Per resident (R1) physician report, R1 is non-ambulatory and has a history of falling and wandering. R1 was also reported to have dementia with behavioral disturbances. On 9/29/2020 and 10/02/2020, the facility observed that R1 had redness around the eyes, to which the facility contacted medical care and R1 was sent to the hospital to obtain further evaluation and treatment, and reported the incidents to R1's family on the same day. Unsubstantiatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20201006152005
Dec 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff not giving resident PRN medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to continue the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Darlene Lindley. LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA reviewed facility records for Resident 1 (R1). LPA and Administrator toured the facility. The investigation revealed the following. Facility records for R1 show R1 was prescribed Hydrocodone-Acetamin 5-325 MG as needed (for pain) and Lorazepam .5 MG as needed (PRN medications). It was reported that on 9/22/2020 the facility did not provide R1 with their PRN Hydrocodone-Acetamin when requested by R1. Facility records show that R1's health care provider sent the facility orders on 9/22/2020 and 9/24/2020 to hold their PRN Hydrocodone-Acetamin till further orders are provided. The Administrator reported that R1 was made aware of the orders by their healthcare provider and by facility staff. R1 no longer resides at the facility and their where abouts are unknown. Thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20200923110812
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained fracture due to staff neglect. Staff are not meeting resident's laundry needs. Staff did not safeguard resident's clothing. Staff did not feed resident. Staff did not properly dress resident.

.Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho arrived unannounced and met with Adminstrator Darlene Lindley for the purpose of delivering the findings into the above allegations. On June 28, 2023, the Department received the complaint, and the investigation was initiated by LPA Kimberly Lyman on June 29, 2023. During the visit on June 29th, LPA Lyman obtained records and conducted the health and safety inspection, and there were no identified concerns observed at the time of the visit. On September 8, 2023, LPA Jessica Cho continued the complaint investigation, interviewed residents and staff, and obtained additional facility and resident records. Interviews were further conducted by LPA Cho via phone calls on September 27, 2023. The following are the findings investigated by the Department which involved a review of records and interviews pertaining to Resident #1 (R1): Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230628100247
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file24typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020256602024440202346020223402021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 992-5380

Is Fullerton Villa licensed?

Yes — Fullerton Villa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fullerton (Orange County): California license #306004839, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 197 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Fullerton Villa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Fullerton Villa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; 196 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.

How much does Fullerton Villa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Fullerton Villa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Fullerton Villa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Fullerton Villa through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

168 of 197 beds occupied (85%) when the state visited on February 18, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Fullerton Villa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 24 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2022 for Fullerton Villa; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 18, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff administered medication to a resident without proper consent
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On February 18, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegation listed above and to deliver the complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Administrator (AD) Jae Wan Rim was present and assisted on today's visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted one staff interview, reviewed and obtained pertinent documents to the complaint. Regarding the allegation, staff administered medication to a resident without proper consent, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that staff administered medication to Resident #1 (R1) without proper consent. LPA reviewed R1's file including the admission agreement, medical assessment, pre-placement appraisal, resident appraisal, needs and services plan, and medication administration records. LPA observed there was no medical power of attorney on file for RCDSS inspection report, February 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260213155556

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLack of care and supervision resulted in resident's decline. Facility did not notify responsible party of resident's change in condition. Facility denied the resident's right to reject medical care or other services. Facility did not ensure resident was provided 3 meals a day. Facility failed to provide basic hygiene items for resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on July 11, 2023 by the Department. It was alleged staff lack of care and supervision resulted in resident’s decline, facility did not notify responsible party of resident’s change in condition, facility denied the resident’s right to reject medical care or other services, facility did not ensure resident was provided 3 meals a day, and facility failed to provide basic hygiene items for resident. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with residents in care and staff. LPA Arias reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation lack of care and supervision resulted in resident’s decline, it was reported resident 1 (R1)’s ability to express themselveCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230711165849
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to issue a refund after a resident moved out Facility staff failed to provide a healthful environment, resulting in a resident's hospitalization
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on February 15, 2024 by the Department. It was alleged staff facility failed to issue a refund after a resident moved out and facility staff failed to provide a healthful environment, resulting in a resident's hospitalization. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with residents in care and staff. LPA Arias reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation facility failed to issue a refund after a resident moved out, it was reported the facility did not provide a refund when resident 1 (R1) did not return to the facility after being hospitalized on January 3, 2024. Continued on LIC9099-C dated 10/23/2025 UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240207092654
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not responding to resident's calls Staff not providing assistance to resident when brushing teeth
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation to the above identified complaint allegations. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted and granted entry. LPA spoke with Jae Wan Rim, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, and interviews conducted. It is alleged that staff not responding to residents’ calls. Interviews with 10 of 10 residents stated that when they call for help, they have always gotten the help they need, and staff come to help them all the time. They stated that they have waited about 10-15 minutes at a time, but they have not waited too long. Interview with staff stated that they get the call and the caregiver that is assigned to that area of the facility Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220712101114

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following resident's admission agreement.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho arrived unannounced for the purpose to investigate into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator (Admin) Darlene Lindley, explained the reason for the visit, and discussed the elements of the allegation. On December 4, 2020, the Department received the complaint, and the 10-day investigation was initiated by LPA Lydia Martinez. LPA Martinez conducted the investigation via telephone and obtained the records via email due to the Coronavirus 2019 precautionary measures at that point in time. During today's visit, LPA Jessica Cho obtained addtional resident records and interviewed resident/staff. The following was revealed during the course of the investigation pertaining to Resident #1 (R1): It is alleged that the facility is not following the resident's admission agreement. In review of the parking fee notice dated November 10, 2020, the notice indicates effective December 10, 2020, there would be a fee of $100.00 for residents utilizinCDSS inspection report, December 13, 2023 · control 22-AS-20201204161940
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not prevent the spread of scabies
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to investigate the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley identified himself and explained the reason for the visit with staff. During the visit, staff lead a brief tour of the facility before interviews began. Regarding the allegation: Facility did not prevent the spread of scabies During the investigation, interviews were conducted with Administrator Darlene Lindley, staff members and residents. 5 individuals interviewed confirmed residents had scabies. 4 staff members interviewed confirmed residents had scabies in 2020. Staff 1 (S1) stated the scabies were treated right away. S1 claimed the facilities in house doctor prescribed cream to treat the residents who had scabies and their roommate, even if the roommate did not have scabies they were still treated. Staff 2 (S2) confirmed residents had scabies and said residents were treated with cream, isolated, rooms were sanitized, and cloths were separated and cleaned.CDSS inspection report, December 12, 2023 · control 22-AS-20200814090028
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained injuries from a fall while in care Staff is threatening resident with eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the complaint received on 10/06/2020 and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by facility administrator (AD) Darlene Lindley and Assistant Administrator Jae Rim. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that resident sustained injuries from a fall while in care. Per resident (R1) physician report, R1 is non-ambulatory and has a history of falling and wandering. R1 was also reported to have dementia with behavioral disturbances. On 9/29/2020 and 10/02/2020, the facility observed that R1 had redness around the eyes, to which the facility contacted medical care and R1 was sent to the hospital to obtain further evaluation and treatment, and reported the incidents to R1's family on the same day. UnsubstantiateCDSS inspection report, December 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20201006152005
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not giving resident PRN medication.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to continue the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Darlene Lindley. LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA reviewed facility records for Resident 1 (R1). LPA and Administrator toured the facility. The investigation revealed the following. Facility records for R1 show R1 was prescribed Hydrocodone-Acetamin 5-325 MG as needed (for pain) and Lorazepam .5 MG as needed (PRN medications). It was reported that on 9/22/2020 the facility did not provide R1 with their PRN Hydrocodone-Acetamin when requested by R1. Facility records show that R1's health care provider sent the facility orders on 9/22/2020 and 9/24/2020 to hold their PRN Hydrocodone-Acetamin till further orders are provided. The Administrator reported that R1 was made aware of the orders by their healthcare provider and by facility staff. R1 no longer resides at the facility and their where abouts are unknown. TheCDSS inspection report, December 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20200923110812
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained fracture due to staff neglect. Staff are not meeting resident's laundry needs. Staff did not safeguard resident's clothing. Staff did not feed resident. Staff did not properly dress resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
.Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho arrived unannounced and met with Adminstrator Darlene Lindley for the purpose of delivering the findings into the above allegations. On June 28, 2023, the Department received the complaint, and the investigation was initiated by LPA Kimberly Lyman on June 29, 2023. During the visit on June 29th, LPA Lyman obtained records and conducted the health and safety inspection, and there were no identified concerns observed at the time of the visit. On September 8, 2023, LPA Jessica Cho continued the complaint investigation, interviewed residents and staff, and obtained additional facility and resident records. Interviews were further conducted by LPA Cho via phone calls on September 27, 2023. The following are the findings investigated by the Department which involved a review of records and interviews pertaining to Resident #1 (R1): UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230628100247

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 24 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
24
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 992-5380
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Fullerton Villa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.