Atwater Residential Care Facility is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Atwater, Merced County, California — state license #247209209, licensed for 5 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 32 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 11, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Atwater Residential Care Facility

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 5 residents · Atwater, CA · Merced County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #247209209, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1691 Joe Silva Avenue · Atwater, Merced County
Phone
(209) 430-1688
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 2 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR THREE (3) AMBULATORY AND TWO (2) NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOM #3 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FIVE(5).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 35 times and filed 32 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 11, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 11, 2026
Occupancy at the December 12, 2024 visit
5 of 5 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 21, 2022 to December 12, 2024. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (10), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 32 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are denying the residents from going outside due to loose animals

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility Facility staff Arlene Ferguson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Licensee Jessica Johnson was not present at the facility during this visit, but did contact LPA Hurt via phone. Regarding the allegation Staff are denying the residents from going outside due to loose animals. LPA's interviewed facility staff 1 on 03/13/2024 who stated the residents do not normally go in the facility backyard because the goats are loose in the area. LPA's observed several goats along with some goat feces, in the backyard loose on the patio near the back facility door. Based on LPA's interviews conducted, and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following Deficiencies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations, Exit interview conducted with facility stthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240311224521
Mar 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not adequately staffed resulting in the facility calling the fire department for assistance. Facility staff engaged in a verbal altercation with a resident. Facility staff left resident in urine soaked clothing for an extended period of time.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation the facility is not adequately staffed resulting in the facility calling the fire department for assistance. Emergency Medical Personnel provided a log with more than 21 dates listed where they have been asked to assist Residents in the facility that have fallen, and residents who need assistance getting up from being seated in a recliner to different areas of the facility. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation, and call logs reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continued... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20230612142552
Jan 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal Eviction Residents conservator not provided Admission Agreement within seven days

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation Illegal Eviction. Resident 1 was taken to the hospital on 12/17/23 and was denied admission back to the facility upon release. Based on LPA's interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegation Residents’ conservator not provided Admission Agreement within seven days. Resident 1’s conservator was not provided an Admission Agreement within seven days of admission to the facility. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies arthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231219084413
20239 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to allow resident to return to facility after hospital stay

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to open a complaint on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility staff Andrene Lowe and explained the purpose of today's visit. Licensee Jessica Johnson was not present at the facility during this visit, but did contact LPA Hurt via phone. Regarding the allegation Staff refused to allow resident to return to facility after hospital stay. Licensee stated Resident 1 did not sign an Admission Agreement and no money was collected therefore was never a resident at this facility.LPA Hurt observed Resident 1 not to be present at the facility during visit on 12/08/2023. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficincies cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Jessica Johnson vis phone, and a copy of this reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231204154208
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue a refund

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegatuons on 12/01/23 at 10:00 a.m.. LPA's met with facility Assistant Administrator Airen Miro and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not issue a refund. Resident 1 provided proof of two paid fees to Licensee totaling $1,855.00 in two separate payments dated on 08/01/2022 (Admission fee $500), and on 08/16/2022 (holding fee $1,355.00.) Resident 1 never moved into the facility. Licensee refunded Resident 1 $500 of the fees paid. The Admission Agreement does not speak to any non refundable "holding" fees. Based on records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. The following deficincies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator Airen Miro, and a copy of this rethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230511143721
Nov 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care Staff did not prevent a resident from causing harm to other residents Staff did not properly reports incidents involving a resident Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident Staff mishandled a resident's medication while in care Staff is not following the admission agreement

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Darius Williams conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Licensee Jessica Johnson over the phone and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation, Staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care. LPA Hurt observed several photos documenting Resident 1’s buttocks area to be extremely red and irritated. Medical records document Resident 1 had erythema and pain in the buttocks area. Based on records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continued.... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230320135406
Oct 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not trained medication management Facility is not ensuring residents health related needs are met

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Lisa Salazar conducted an unannounced facility visit conduct a Case Management visit. LPA's met with facility staff Octavia Mcvea and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation Staff are not trained medication management. The Licensee was not able to provide medication training for Staff 1 to LPA's Hurt and Salazar for review. Based on LPA's observation during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230831094129
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations8typical 0
Type B citations13typical 0
Substantiated complaints23typical 0
Total complaints11typical 0
State visits on file35typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020251102024453202314146202211111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Merced County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 430-1688

Is Atwater Residential Care Facility licensed?

Yes — Atwater Residential Care Facility is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Atwater (Merced County): California license #247209209, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 5 residents. State records list 32 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 11, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Atwater Residential Care Facility care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Atwater Residential Care Facility with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR THREE (3) AMBULATORY AND TWO (2) NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOM #3 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FIVE(5).

How much does Atwater Residential Care Facility cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Atwater Residential Care Facility's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Merced County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Atwater Residential Care Facility accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Atwater Residential Care Facility is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 5 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on December 12, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Atwater Residential Care Facility?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 35 state visits and 32 dated documents since 2022 for Atwater Residential Care Facility; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 12, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are denying the residents from going outside due to loose animals
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility Facility staff Arlene Ferguson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Licensee Jessica Johnson was not present at the facility during this visit, but did contact LPA Hurt via phone. Regarding the allegation Staff are denying the residents from going outside due to loose animals. LPA's interviewed facility staff 1 on 03/13/2024 who stated the residents do not normally go in the facility backyard because the goats are loose in the area. LPA's observed several goats along with some goat feces, in the backyard loose on the patio near the back facility door. Based on LPA's interviews conducted, and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following Deficiencies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations, Exit interview conducted with facility stCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240311224521
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not adequately staffed resulting in the facility calling the fire department for assistance. Facility staff engaged in a verbal altercation with a resident. Facility staff left resident in urine soaked clothing for an extended period of time.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation the facility is not adequately staffed resulting in the facility calling the fire department for assistance. Emergency Medical Personnel provided a log with more than 21 dates listed where they have been asked to assist Residents in the facility that have fallen, and residents who need assistance getting up from being seated in a recliner to different areas of the facility. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation, and call logs reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continued... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20230612142552
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal Eviction Residents conservator not provided Admission Agreement within seven days
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Assistant Administrator, Airen Miro and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation Illegal Eviction. Resident 1 was taken to the hospital on 12/17/23 and was denied admission back to the facility upon release. Based on LPA's interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegation Residents’ conservator not provided Admission Agreement within seven days. Resident 1’s conservator was not provided an Admission Agreement within seven days of admission to the facility. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies arCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231219084413

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refused to allow resident to return to facility after hospital stay
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to open a complaint on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility staff Andrene Lowe and explained the purpose of today's visit. Licensee Jessica Johnson was not present at the facility during this visit, but did contact LPA Hurt via phone. Regarding the allegation Staff refused to allow resident to return to facility after hospital stay. Licensee stated Resident 1 did not sign an Admission Agreement and no money was collected therefore was never a resident at this facility.LPA Hurt observed Resident 1 not to be present at the facility during visit on 12/08/2023. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficincies cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Jessica Johnson vis phone, and a copy of this reportCDSS inspection report, December 8, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231204154208
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not issue a refund
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Brianna Miranda arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegatuons on 12/01/23 at 10:00 a.m.. LPA's met with facility Assistant Administrator Airen Miro and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not issue a refund. Resident 1 provided proof of two paid fees to Licensee totaling $1,855.00 in two separate payments dated on 08/01/2022 (Admission fee $500), and on 08/16/2022 (holding fee $1,355.00.) Resident 1 never moved into the facility. Licensee refunded Resident 1 $500 of the fees paid. The Admission Agreement does not speak to any non refundable "holding" fees. Based on records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. The following deficincies are being cited Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator Airen Miro, and a copy of this reCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230511143721
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care Staff did not prevent a resident from causing harm to other residents Staff did not properly reports incidents involving a resident Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident Staff mishandled a resident's medication while in care Staff is not following the admission agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Darius Williams conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver investigation findings. LPA’s met with Licensee Jessica Johnson over the phone and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation, Staff did not meet a resident's incontinence needs while in care. LPA Hurt observed several photos documenting Resident 1’s buttocks area to be extremely red and irritated. Medical records document Resident 1 had erythema and pain in the buttocks area. Based on records reviewed during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continued.... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 25, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230320135406
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not trained medication management Facility is not ensuring residents health related needs are met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Lisa Salazar conducted an unannounced facility visit conduct a Case Management visit. LPA's met with facility staff Octavia Mcvea and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation Staff are not trained medication management. The Licensee was not able to provide medication training for Staff 1 to LPA's Hurt and Salazar for review. Based on LPA's observation during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230831094129
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff was unable to communicate due to language barrier Staff are not properly maintaining resident’s medical records
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 07/28/2023, Licensing Program Analysts(LPA's) Sarah Hurt and Lisa Salazar arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint inspection. LPAs met with facility Licensee Jessica Johnson announced the purpose of the inspection. Regarding the allegation Staff was unable to communicate due to language barrier.LPA's observed facility Staff 1 present during visit is unable to communicate with licensing staff or facility residents as she does not speak English. Based on LPA's observation during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continued on 9099C.. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230725122932
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility accepted a resident who requires a higher level of care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt and David Ayers conducted an unannounced facility visit to open a complaint investigation. LPA's met with facility Licensee Jessica Johnson and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, reviewed documentation, and toured the facility. Based on interviews and documentation, Resident 1(R1) was admitted to the facility on 11/23/2022. Based on records review, R1 was admitted without a complete pre-admission appraisal. R1's Needs and Services Plan was also incomplete. Based on interviews, the facility did not have proper eqipument to meet R1's needs. The allegation is Substantiated. See attached 9099D for citation issued in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. Exit iterview conducted with Licensee. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 24, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221201135742
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide the resident’s representative written notice of the rate increase within two business days after initially providing services at the new level of care Staff did not refund authorized representative after resident's passing Staff refused to allow authorized representative in the facility to pick up residents belongings Staff did not provide a comprehensive description of any items and services provided under a single fee, such as monthly fee for room, board and other items and services shall be listed in the admission agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA Hurt met with Administrator Jessica Johnson and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not provide the resident’s representative written notice of the rate increase within two business days after initially providing services at the new level of care. The facility Admissions Agreement documents under section "Notice of Rate Changes." We shall provide the resident or the representatives a written itemized explanation of the additional services provided. Resident 1's responsible party stated they were given the written description through email on 11/18/2022 after the verbal notification of increased rate on 11/04/2022. Based on facility records reviewed, and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Continued on 9099C.... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221115100653

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not refund fees to resident who decided not to enter the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This is an amended report. On 09/21/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Walton conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Administrator. Facility staff contacted Administrator via telephone, and she was unable to attend but gave LPA verbal permission to meet with Caregiver, Arlene Angeles. LPA delivered findings of the complaint, whose signature on the original report, confirms receipt. Today, 11/16/2022, LPA Walton and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Melinda Hoffmann contacted Administrator via telephone and informed her that the report is being amended as follows. CONTINUED TO 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 21, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220914194055

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 35 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
8
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
13
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
23
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
35
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 430-1688
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Atwater Residential Care Facility? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.