Oakmont Of Novato is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Novato, Marin County, California — state license #216804022, licensed for 118 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 51 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Oakmont Of Novato

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 118 residents · Novato, CA · Marin County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #216804022, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1465 S. Novato Blvd. · Novato, Marin County
Phone
(628) 215-1200
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 118 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 118 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 57 times and filed 51 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 6, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 6, 2026
Occupancy at the October 21, 2025 visit
85 of 118 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 18 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 29, 2022 to October 21, 2025. 18 of the 18 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 18 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 18 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 51 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility did not provide responsible party with refund.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the allegation listed above and met with Scott Davis, Executive Director. There is an allegation regarding the facility did not provide the party responsible with a refund. Per Reporting Party, resident (R1) resided at the facility from May 23, 2025, until July 21, 2025, and the facility owes R1 part of the $8,000.00 community fee that R1 paid for services. However, it is their understanding that there is a refund amount owed to R1 that is unknown at this time due to lack of communication between R1’s responsible party and the facility staff. Based on LPA's interviews conducted with R1’s responsible party, they are aware that there is an outstanding amount of $8707 that R1 may owe to the facility for facility fees. On 10/21/25 LPA conducted a 10-day visit to the facility conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on records review, it was corroborated wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251017113717
Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate food service. Staff eat residents' food.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of this investigations statements were taken, unannounced site visits were made and food supplies inspected, documents obtained and reviewed as well as photographs taken. It has been alleged that facility has run out of food such as ice cream, milk, beef, and snacks and that staff eat food intended for residents. Complainant and Co-Complainant are Anonymous without contact information and have not been available for interview. LPA has made three unannounced visits to facility and found the kitchen to be well stocked with a variety of food that meets or exceeds the requirements of Title twenty-Two Regulations. Fresh fruit and other snacks were observed in plentiful supply and available to the residents. Administration has stated that staff are permitted to eat facility prepared food but only food considered "left over" when residents are finished and whthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241007152252
Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff does not provide adequate food service to residents in care. Facility staff does not provide food of good quality to residents in care. Facility staff are not adequately meeting the residents needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Helena Rummonds arrived unannounced at approximately 1:35PM to deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA and Executive Director discussed the purpose of the visit. Complaint alleges that residents needs are not being met by not providing adequate food, and the food not being of good quality. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and made observations. LPA toured the facility kitchen on visits dated 6/20/24 and 7/19/24. LPA found food to be stored as per regulation and found quality perishable foods. During tour of kitchen on visit dated 6/20, LPA spoke with Regional Chef Specialist who confirmed that the facility was onboarding a new chef to implement positive changes within the facility kitchen. 6 of 6 staff and residents interviewed confirmed that food quality has improved since the onboarding of the new chef. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240611090420
Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff abused resident in care ******** This is an amended version of the original document*******

At approximately 1:50PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Helena Rummonds and Jacky Macias arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director, Ric Pielstick. Complaint alleges that staff abused resident in care. Per interviews and review of documentation, multiple facility staff reported to facility management on 4/12/2024 that they had witnessed Staff 1 (S1) physically abuse multiple residents in care over the previous two weeks. Abuse included, but not limited to, physically striking resident(s), with their hand or an object, grabbing a resident by the wrists and shaking them, holding a resident down by their neck and transferring a resident roughly. S1 was arrested and the Department issued an immediate exclusion order for S1 on April 23, 2024. Based on information obtained during the investigation, facility staff did not fulfill their mandated reporting requirements. Continued on 9099(C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240415153642
Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident's responsible party with proper rate increase notice Staff not following terms of admission agreement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Helena Rummonds arrived unannounced at approximately 9:15AM to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Ric Pielstick. Complaint alleges that staff are not following terms of admission agreement, and that staff did not provide resident's responsible party with proper rate increase notice. Review of documentation revealed that residents responsible party and facility came to the agreement of $3,095/month for standard rent. Review of documentation revealed that resident was assessed before move in on 08/24/2023 with 25 billable points leaving their cost of care at $855 a month, in addition to their base rate of $3,095 leaving their total monthly payment including rent and cost of care at $3,950. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240105103001
Mar 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed. Staff did not ensure resident's medication is filled.

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Facility ran out of a medication for Resident (R1) resulting in missed administration of the medication on 10/29/2023 and 10/30/2023. Through statements and review of documents it has been determined that: Facility requested the medication refill 6 or 7 days before needed from the Medical Clinic; Facility Health Services Director states that the Medical Clinic delayed the refilling of the medication due to an internal communications issue and apologized for the delay but refused to put a statement in writing; Staff were unable to administer the medication on 10/29 and 10/30 due to the delay in obtaining the refill; Based upon statements and review of documents, it appears the facility made a reasonable attempt to obtain the medication before it was depleted; Although the allegations may be true or valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove the allegathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231120081148
20234 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Failed to seek timely medical resulting in resident death Staff does not meet residents care needs Staff stole residents medication

At approximately 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Helena Rummonds and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Victoria Bertozzi arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director, Liza Hix and Health Service Director, Kimari Pinkney. Complaint alleges a resident was vomiting and not feeling well but there was a delay in sending them to the hospital resulting in them passing away at the hospital. Per interviews conducted, resident did not show signs of illness preceding the vomiting episode. Interview revealed that following vomiting episode, the resident continued to be monitored until their symptoms escalated, requiring them to be sent to the hospital. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231109142722
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff violated residents personal rights

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cuadra and Rummonds arrived unannounced at the facility and met with Executive Director, Liza Hix to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation above. It was alleged that Staff violated residents’ personal rights. Per Reporting party, Staff (S1) held up two fists like they were going to punch resident (R1). LPA was provided with facility internal communication records of various incidents including the incident dated 8/31/23, LPA obtained statements of incident staff (S1 and S2). S1 detailed in a daily summary report an incident that occurred on 8/31/23 around 8:05am. Per email from S1, R1 came into the lobby approached S1 to request their name. Per the statement responded, they were wearing their name badge. However, S1 inquired about the reason for R1 requesting their name, when R1 became very aggressive and S1 informed that they walked away, since R1 was making accusations about S1 that did not apply to them. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230901102047
Oct 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Failure to seek medical attention -Neglect/Lack of Supervision

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cuadra and Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Business Office Director Tristan Amari. Regarding the allegation of Facility staff failed to seek medical attention. On 5/24/23 resident (R1) concerns were raised by outside party regarding R1's right leg position and felt that R1 was in pain, where staff was advised to take R1 to Kaiser Hospital for evaluation. Per Reporting Party, Facility med-technician was shown R1's right leg position and informed that the resident appeared to be in pain-eyes closed with intermittent groaning. On 5/24/23 R1 was diagnosed with a right distal femur periprosthetic fracture. LPA contacted Reporting Party on 5/26/23 to gather any additional information regarding incident reports or any medical issues where the facility failed to seek medical attention for residents in a timely manner. Based on interviews conducted on 7/21/23 and 7/the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230524142125
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints13typical 2
Total complaints19typical 7
State visits on file57typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202544020247102202316232202210122
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Marin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (628) 215-1200

Is Oakmont Of Novato licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of Novato is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Novato (Marin County): California license #216804022, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 118 residents. State records list 51 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakmont Of Novato care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Novato with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 118 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Oakmont Of Novato cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Novato's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Marin County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of Novato accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of Novato is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

85 of 118 beds occupied (72%) when the state visited on October 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Novato?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 57 state visits and 51 dated documents since 2022 for Oakmont Of Novato; 18 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

18 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility did not provide responsible party with refund.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the allegation listed above and met with Scott Davis, Executive Director. There is an allegation regarding the facility did not provide the party responsible with a refund. Per Reporting Party, resident (R1) resided at the facility from May 23, 2025, until July 21, 2025, and the facility owes R1 part of the $8,000.00 community fee that R1 paid for services. However, it is their understanding that there is a refund amount owed to R1 that is unknown at this time due to lack of communication between R1’s responsible party and the facility staff. Based on LPA's interviews conducted with R1’s responsible party, they are aware that there is an outstanding amount of $8707 that R1 may owe to the facility for facility fees. On 10/21/25 LPA conducted a 10-day visit to the facility conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on records review, it was corroborated wCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251017113717

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate food service. Staff eat residents' food.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. During the course of this investigations statements were taken, unannounced site visits were made and food supplies inspected, documents obtained and reviewed as well as photographs taken. It has been alleged that facility has run out of food such as ice cream, milk, beef, and snacks and that staff eat food intended for residents. Complainant and Co-Complainant are Anonymous without contact information and have not been available for interview. LPA has made three unannounced visits to facility and found the kitchen to be well stocked with a variety of food that meets or exceeds the requirements of Title twenty-Two Regulations. Fresh fruit and other snacks were observed in plentiful supply and available to the residents. Administration has stated that staff are permitted to eat facility prepared food but only food considered "left over" when residents are finished and whCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241007152252
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff does not provide adequate food service to residents in care. Facility staff does not provide food of good quality to residents in care. Facility staff are not adequately meeting the residents needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Helena Rummonds arrived unannounced at approximately 1:35PM to deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA and Executive Director discussed the purpose of the visit. Complaint alleges that residents needs are not being met by not providing adequate food, and the food not being of good quality. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and made observations. LPA toured the facility kitchen on visits dated 6/20/24 and 7/19/24. LPA found food to be stored as per regulation and found quality perishable foods. During tour of kitchen on visit dated 6/20, LPA spoke with Regional Chef Specialist who confirmed that the facility was onboarding a new chef to implement positive changes within the facility kitchen. 6 of 6 staff and residents interviewed confirmed that food quality has improved since the onboarding of the new chef. Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240611090420
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff abused resident in care ******** This is an amended version of the original document*******
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 1:50PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Helena Rummonds and Jacky Macias arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director, Ric Pielstick. Complaint alleges that staff abused resident in care. Per interviews and review of documentation, multiple facility staff reported to facility management on 4/12/2024 that they had witnessed Staff 1 (S1) physically abuse multiple residents in care over the previous two weeks. Abuse included, but not limited to, physically striking resident(s), with their hand or an object, grabbing a resident by the wrists and shaking them, holding a resident down by their neck and transferring a resident roughly. S1 was arrested and the Department issued an immediate exclusion order for S1 on April 23, 2024. Based on information obtained during the investigation, facility staff did not fulfill their mandated reporting requirements. Continued on 9099(C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240415153642
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident's responsible party with proper rate increase notice Staff not following terms of admission agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Helena Rummonds arrived unannounced at approximately 9:15AM to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Ric Pielstick. Complaint alleges that staff are not following terms of admission agreement, and that staff did not provide resident's responsible party with proper rate increase notice. Review of documentation revealed that residents responsible party and facility came to the agreement of $3,095/month for standard rent. Review of documentation revealed that resident was assessed before move in on 08/24/2023 with 25 billable points leaving their cost of care at $855 a month, in addition to their base rate of $3,095 leaving their total monthly payment including rent and cost of care at $3,950. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240105103001
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed. Staff did not ensure resident's medication is filled.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Facility ran out of a medication for Resident (R1) resulting in missed administration of the medication on 10/29/2023 and 10/30/2023. Through statements and review of documents it has been determined that: Facility requested the medication refill 6 or 7 days before needed from the Medical Clinic; Facility Health Services Director states that the Medical Clinic delayed the refilling of the medication due to an internal communications issue and apologized for the delay but refused to put a statement in writing; Staff were unable to administer the medication on 10/29 and 10/30 due to the delay in obtaining the refill; Based upon statements and review of documents, it appears the facility made a reasonable attempt to obtain the medication before it was depleted; Although the allegations may be true or valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove the allegaCDSS inspection report, January 11, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231120081148

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFailed to seek timely medical resulting in resident death Staff does not meet residents care needs Staff stole residents medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Helena Rummonds and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Victoria Bertozzi arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director, Liza Hix and Health Service Director, Kimari Pinkney. Complaint alleges a resident was vomiting and not feeling well but there was a delay in sending them to the hospital resulting in them passing away at the hospital. Per interviews conducted, resident did not show signs of illness preceding the vomiting episode. Interview revealed that following vomiting episode, the resident continued to be monitored until their symptoms escalated, requiring them to be sent to the hospital. Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 27, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231109142722
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff violated residents personal rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cuadra and Rummonds arrived unannounced at the facility and met with Executive Director, Liza Hix to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation above. It was alleged that Staff violated residents’ personal rights. Per Reporting party, Staff (S1) held up two fists like they were going to punch resident (R1). LPA was provided with facility internal communication records of various incidents including the incident dated 8/31/23, LPA obtained statements of incident staff (S1 and S2). S1 detailed in a daily summary report an incident that occurred on 8/31/23 around 8:05am. Per email from S1, R1 came into the lobby approached S1 to request their name. Per the statement responded, they were wearing their name badge. However, S1 inquired about the reason for R1 requesting their name, when R1 became very aggressive and S1 informed that they walked away, since R1 was making accusations about S1 that did not apply to them. Continued on LIC9099C... UnsubsCDSS inspection report, October 13, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230901102047
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Failure to seek medical attention -Neglect/Lack of Supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cuadra and Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Business Office Director Tristan Amari. Regarding the allegation of Facility staff failed to seek medical attention. On 5/24/23 resident (R1) concerns were raised by outside party regarding R1's right leg position and felt that R1 was in pain, where staff was advised to take R1 to Kaiser Hospital for evaluation. Per Reporting Party, Facility med-technician was shown R1's right leg position and informed that the resident appeared to be in pain-eyes closed with intermittent groaning. On 5/24/23 R1 was diagnosed with a right distal femur periprosthetic fracture. LPA contacted Reporting Party on 5/26/23 to gather any additional information regarding incident reports or any medical issues where the facility failed to seek medical attention for residents in a timely manner. Based on interviews conducted on 7/21/23 and 7/CDSS inspection report, August 17, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230524142125
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff did not meet resident's incontinence needs Staff did not properly supervise resident Staff did not assist resident with showering
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with Marketing Director and discussed the allegations. During the course of this investigation, this Department has interviewed witnesses and staff, reviewed and obtained documents, and made site visits to the facility. The following determinations are made: Personal belongings of R1, including glasses and hearing aides, were lost, stolen or misplaced while R1 was in care; Although the Licensee did not follow the required investigative and documentation requirements, it remains unknown how the belongings were removed from R1's possession; Statements made by current and former staff, as well as care note entries for R1, illustrate that when R1's spouse was not present at the facility, R1 often refused bathing and changing attempts by staff and could become agitated and aggressive; Facility care notes are kept for 30 days and not all notes were available for review. AltCDSS inspection report, June 1, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230317123457
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident(s) have sustained multiple falls due to lack of supervision. Facility staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator and discussed the allegations. During the course of this investigation, this Department has made site visits, intrerviewed staff and witnesses, obtained and reviewed documents. The following determinations are made: Complainant has not provided sufficient information regarding dates and medication names to fully investigate the medication allegation; the Department has shown that a medication for R1 was not administered as ordered on 12/1 and 12/2; There was a delay in obtaining the medication, however, which involved the Responsible Person's response in providing the medication; a review of resident falls during the approximate period of two months prior to the receipt of this complaint, does not substantiate the allegation that the falls resulted from a lack of staff supervision; High fall risk residents identified were on fall management progCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230203120245
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not prevent altercations between residents Facility staff are not reporting incidents to licensing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on the above captioned complaint allegations. LPA met with the Administrator and discussed the findings. This investigation included a thorough review of resident records and other documents; interviews with witnesses and staff; site visits to the facility. The following determinations are made: R1 and R2 were involved displayed aggressive behaviors with each other on many occasions while in care at the facility; Records show that the behaviors were addressed in the residents' care plans; Residents' care notes document reasonable steps taken by staff to deal with the aggressions; Most incidents were reported as required by 87211; Two incidents which were identified as not reported may not have rose to the level of requiring a report and sufficient information to make a determination of requirement to report was not found. Although the allegations may be true, or valid, based upon the documentsCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221101155054
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an injury due to lack of care and supervision Staff do not report incidents to resident's authorized person
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on the above captioned complaint allegations. LPA met with the Administrator and discussed the findings. This investigation included a thorough review of resident records and other documents; interviews with witnesses and staff; site visits to the facility. The following determinations are made: R1 has fallen and sustained injuries while in care; Facility incorporated fall prevention plan in R1's care plan; Record review indicateas that facility reported incidents per 87211 for R1 on a regular basis; Complainant could not provide sufficient details in order to investigatate a specific incident claimed to have gone unreported; Care notes suggest appropriate responses by care staff to R1's falls; Origins of some falls are unknown but sufficient evidence to link falls to lack of supervision was not found. Although the allegations may be true, based on statements; records and visits, there is not aCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221116141751
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not preventing resident's television from interfering with another resident's sleep
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
***AMENDED - Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct an investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator Ric Pielstick. During the investigation, LPA reviewed/obtained records, made observations and conducted interviews. It is alleged that Staff are not preventing resident's television from interfering with another resident's sleep. Resident (R1) lives in an adjoining apartment to resident (R2) and resident (R3) who share an apartment together. R1 claims that the television volume increased when R3 recently started residing with R2. LPA reviewed Appendix C (Statement of residents personal rights) of the facility house rules which state in part “ We request that all residents monitor the volume of their televisions…” Interviews with staff (S1 & S2) found that they had been asked to check the television sound level by complaint of R1. R2 stated to staff they would turn down their TV, but failed to do so. S3 stated that they observed thCDSS inspection report, March 1, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230223143406
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility vaccinated a resident without obtaining permission from resident's responsible party. ****This is an amended version of the original report*****
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. LPA met with Ric Pielstick and discussed the findings. During the course of this investigation statement were taken, site visits made, and documents obtained and reviewed. The following determinations are made: R1 has a designated responsible person; On or about October 27,2022, facility provided flu shot clinic for residents conducted by outside vendor and on facility premises; R1 received a vaccine at the clinic on 10/27: Responsible person for R1 did not consent to the procedure and, in fact, declined the vaccine in preference to obtaining the vaccine for R1 at a later date due to a recent medical procedure undergone by R1. Based upon the records reviewed and statements taken, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of RegulatCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221130172055

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 57 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
13
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
19
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
57
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(628) 215-1200
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of Novato? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.