Pasadena Highlands is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603384, licensed for 245 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Pasadena Highlands

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 245 residents · Pasadena, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198603384, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1575 E Washington Blvd · Pasadena, Los Angeles County
Phone
(801) 815-0808
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 245 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 35 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 30 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 245 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 30 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS 3RD FLOOR. APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ON 1ST 2ND AND 3RD FLOORS WITH APPROVED EXITS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 35.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 23, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 12, 2026
Occupancy at the September 20, 2025 visit
215 of 245 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 16 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 2, 2022 to September 20, 2025. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 16 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 18 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident records to resident's authorized representative.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 09/20/2025, to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. On 09/18/2025, LPA Ramirez conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation. Due to time constraints, additional interviews needed and additional time to review records, a need further investigation was documented. During today’s visit, LPA Ramirez was greeted by Director of Marketing and Sales- Cynthia Leon and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Staff Roster, copies of the following for Resident#1 (R1): Medical Records request, Authorization Attachment, HIPPA Compliant Authorization for the Release of Patient Information, Durable Power of Attorney, Declaration of Custodian of Records, Admission Agreement, and physical plant tour. LPA Ramirez conducted the following interviews: Staff#1 - 3 interviews (S1 – S3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250912094702
Sep 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted an initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Kay Cano and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During this investigation, LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident rosters, reviewed R-1’s file and obtained relevant documentation, interviewed Staff #1 (S-1) through Staff #5 (S-5) and interviewed Resident #1 (R-1), Resident #4 (R-4) and Resident #5 (R-5) . LPA attempted to interview Resident #2 (R-2) and Resident #3 (R-3) and was unsuccessful. All interviewed residents are residing in the memory care unit (where allegation allegedly occurred) and the census for the memory care unit is (35). LPA was unable to interview additional residents from this unit. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250910125946
Aug 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance timely resulting in hospitalization

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted a subsequent complain visit in regard to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Med-Tech Cherry Castro and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Kay Cano was notified by telephone. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 07/22/2025, LPA toured the facility, interviewed Administrator, and obtained copies of the following documents: staff roster, resident roster, R1’s physicians reports, admission agreement, identification information (LIC 601), facility service plan, health and services evaluation results, meal orders, hospital discharge paperwork, medication list, and facility notes. During visit on 08/14/2025 LPA Gutierrez interviewed staff #1, interviewed staff# 2- Staff #4 by telephone, and residents #1-residents #6. On 08/22/2025 Staff five (S5) was interviewed over the telephone. During today’s visit LPA delivered findings. See 9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250717082326
May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls and injuries Staff performed an unsafe transfer resulting in resident sustaining an injury Resident developed a pressure injury due to staff neglect Resident’s condition worsened due to staff neglect Staff isolated resident in her room

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Trueman met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. At today's visit 05/22/24 LPA has completed the following: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1- #2 (S1-S2) and Residents #2 - #8 (R2-R8). LPA reviewed Resident R1's file and the facility submitted the Physician's Report, Emergency ID, Special Incident Report's (SIR's) and Pre-placement Appraisal. Documentation from the primary care doctor, and documentation from Huntington Health Hospital were also submitted. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls and injuries, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025 · control 28-AS-20240725110705
Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not inform resident's representative of incident(s) as required

**This is a subsequent visit to amend and supersede the reports dated 02/24/2025. The reason for the amendment is to remove confidential information listed on the initial report. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. ** On 02/24/2025, LPA Vaid conducted an Initial 10-Day complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA was met by Adrienne Hurd-Assistant Executive Director. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with Adriene and did not observe any health and safety concerns. Investigation consisted of the following: interview of Staff #1 - Staff #7 (S1-S7); interviews of residents from resident#1-resident #10 (R1-R10); requested, obtained, and reviewed client #1 face sheet, admissions record, physicians report, preplacement appraisal, health services evaluation and service plan, mini-mental state examination. Staff roster and client roster. Continued 809C..... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250219084240
Mar 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not inform resident's representative of incident(s) as required.

LPA Vaid conducted an Initial 10-Day complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA was met by Adrienne Hurd-Assistant Executive Director. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with Adriene and did not observe any health and safety concerns. Investigation consisted of the following: interview of Staff #1 - Staff #7 (S1-S7); interviews of reisdents from resident#1-resident #10 (R1-R10); requested, obtained, and reviewed client #1 face sheet, admissions record, physicians report, preplacement appraisal, health services evaluation and service plan, mini-mental state examination. Staff roster and client roster. Regarding the allegation:Staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. It is alleged that R1 is experiencing progressive behvioral expressions related to dementia and the facility is not addressing the changes in R1's condition and should have R1 placed in memory care or higher-level care facility. CONTINUED ON 9099C......the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250219084240
20248 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly handle resident's wound care. Due to staff neglect, resident's wound worsened while in care. Staff did not note changes in resident's medical condition. Staff did not seek resident timely medical attention. Staff did not provide resident's family with a copy of the resident's wound care plan. Facility retained a resident requiring a higher level of care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit at the facility regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Cynthia Leon and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 11/20/23 LPA Rea conducted an initial investigation visit and requested some documents. On 8/29/24 LPA Flores was assigned the investigation. On 9/3/24 LPA Flores conducted interviews over the phone with facility’s administrator and resident #1(R1)’s family representative and requested facility records and medical records. On 9/6/24 LPA interviewed Hospice care staff and requested R1’s medical records. On 9/24/24 LPA conducted interviews with 9 residents over the phone. On 9/25/24 LPA conducted an additional interview with one resident. On 10/7/24 LPA interviewed 3 staff over the phone. On 10/9/24 LPA interviewed 2 staff over the phone. On 10/12/24 LPA delivered findings for this complaint. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231115111536
Sep 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not keep the facility free from pest.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Trueman met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. At today's visit 07/02/24, LPA has completed the following: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1- #3 (S1-S3) and Residents #1-#8 (R1-R8). LPA toured the physical plant including the outside gardens and along the walls. LPA inspected the facilities food supply, kitchen area and dining room, LPA reviewed documentation of pest control services contracted by the facility for the last 2 months. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation Staff do not keep the facility free from pest, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed that 8 out of 8 residents stated that the food service is good and that they had never observed roaches, rodents or flies and had not been told by anyonethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240627153804
May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not keep the facility free from pest Staff do not properly sanitize kitchen items Staff do not keep the facility free from mildew Staff do not follow proper food handling techniques

*** This report supersedes report dated 5/2/24 to revise (1) of (4) allegations to an accurate description and provide additional details in the report. Findings delivered have not changed*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit for the allegation(s) listed above to redeliver findings. LPA Villalobos met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. As of todays, LPA has completed the following: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1-#8 (S1-S8) and Residents #1-#10 (R1-R10), LPA toured the physical plant including the outside gardens and along the walls, LPA inspected the facilities food supply, kitchen area and dinging room, LPA reviewed documentation of pest control services contracted by the facility for the last month, and reviewed work orders requested by facility residents for the last month. The investigation revealed the following: Contthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240425201839
May 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not keep the facility free from rodents Staff do not properly sanitize kitchen items Staff do not keep the facility free from mildew Staff do not follow proper food handling techniques

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Villalobos met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA conducted the following on todays visit: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1-#8 (S1-S8) and Residents #1-#10 (R1-R10), LPA toured the physcial plant including the outside gardens and along the walls, LPA inspected the facilities food supply and kitchen area, LPA reviewed documentation of pest control services contracted by the facility for the last month, and reviewed work orders requested by facility residents for the last month. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240425201839
Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Wrongful Eviction.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Villalobos met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA conducted the following: Interviewed staff #1-#6 (S1-S6), Interviewed residents #1-#6 (R1-R6) , interviewed R1 and R2's Responsible Party (W1), collected copies of the staff and resident roster, and collected and reviewed documents from R1 and R2's file. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation "Wrongful Eviction" it was alleged that the facility is wrongfully evicting R1 and R2 due to false belief that the residents are unable to follow facility policies... Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240312142800
Jan 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025881202488020232202022571
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (801) 815-0808

Is Pasadena Highlands licensed?

Yes — Pasadena Highlands is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Pasadena (Los Angeles County): California license #198603384, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 245 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Pasadena Highlands care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Pasadena Highlands with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 245 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 30 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS 3RD FLOOR. APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ON 1ST 2ND AND 3RD FLOORS WITH APPROVED EXITS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 35.

How much does Pasadena Highlands cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Pasadena Highlands's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Pasadena Highlands accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Pasadena Highlands is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

215 of 245 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on September 20, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Pasadena Highlands?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2022 for Pasadena Highlands; 16 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 20, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

16 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident records to resident's authorized representative.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 09/20/2025, to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. On 09/18/2025, LPA Ramirez conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation. Due to time constraints, additional interviews needed and additional time to review records, a need further investigation was documented. During today’s visit, LPA Ramirez was greeted by Director of Marketing and Sales- Cynthia Leon and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Staff Roster, copies of the following for Resident#1 (R1): Medical Records request, Authorization Attachment, HIPPA Compliant Authorization for the Release of Patient Information, Durable Power of Attorney, Declaration of Custodian of Records, Admission Agreement, and physical plant tour. LPA Ramirez conducted the following interviews: Staff#1 - 3 interviews (S1 – S3CDSS inspection report, September 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250912094702
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted an initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Kay Cano and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During this investigation, LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident rosters, reviewed R-1’s file and obtained relevant documentation, interviewed Staff #1 (S-1) through Staff #5 (S-5) and interviewed Resident #1 (R-1), Resident #4 (R-4) and Resident #5 (R-5) . LPA attempted to interview Resident #2 (R-2) and Resident #3 (R-3) and was unsuccessful. All interviewed residents are residing in the memory care unit (where allegation allegedly occurred) and the census for the memory care unit is (35). LPA was unable to interview additional residents from this unit. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 12, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250910125946
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not answer resident's calls for assistance timely resulting in hospitalization
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted a subsequent complain visit in regard to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Med-Tech Cherry Castro and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Kay Cano was notified by telephone. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 07/22/2025, LPA toured the facility, interviewed Administrator, and obtained copies of the following documents: staff roster, resident roster, R1’s physicians reports, admission agreement, identification information (LIC 601), facility service plan, health and services evaluation results, meal orders, hospital discharge paperwork, medication list, and facility notes. During visit on 08/14/2025 LPA Gutierrez interviewed staff #1, interviewed staff# 2- Staff #4 by telephone, and residents #1-residents #6. On 08/22/2025 Staff five (S5) was interviewed over the telephone. During today’s visit LPA delivered findings. See 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 24, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250717082326
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls and injuries Staff performed an unsafe transfer resulting in resident sustaining an injury Resident developed a pressure injury due to staff neglect Resident’s condition worsened due to staff neglect Staff isolated resident in her room
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Trueman met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. At today's visit 05/22/24 LPA has completed the following: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1- #2 (S1-S2) and Residents #2 - #8 (R2-R8). LPA reviewed Resident R1's file and the facility submitted the Physician's Report, Emergency ID, Special Incident Report's (SIR's) and Pre-placement Appraisal. Documentation from the primary care doctor, and documentation from Huntington Health Hospital were also submitted. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls and injuries, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2025 · control 28-AS-20240725110705
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not inform resident's representative of incident(s) as required
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
**This is a subsequent visit to amend and supersede the reports dated 02/24/2025. The reason for the amendment is to remove confidential information listed on the initial report. The findings will remain unsubstantiated. ** On 02/24/2025, LPA Vaid conducted an Initial 10-Day complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA was met by Adrienne Hurd-Assistant Executive Director. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with Adriene and did not observe any health and safety concerns. Investigation consisted of the following: interview of Staff #1 - Staff #7 (S1-S7); interviews of residents from resident#1-resident #10 (R1-R10); requested, obtained, and reviewed client #1 face sheet, admissions record, physicians report, preplacement appraisal, health services evaluation and service plan, mini-mental state examination. Staff roster and client roster. Continued 809C..... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250219084240
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not inform resident's representative of incident(s) as required.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Vaid conducted an Initial 10-Day complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA was met by Adrienne Hurd-Assistant Executive Director. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with Adriene and did not observe any health and safety concerns. Investigation consisted of the following: interview of Staff #1 - Staff #7 (S1-S7); interviews of reisdents from resident#1-resident #10 (R1-R10); requested, obtained, and reviewed client #1 face sheet, admissions record, physicians report, preplacement appraisal, health services evaluation and service plan, mini-mental state examination. Staff roster and client roster. Regarding the allegation:Staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition. It is alleged that R1 is experiencing progressive behvioral expressions related to dementia and the facility is not addressing the changes in R1's condition and should have R1 placed in memory care or higher-level care facility. CONTINUED ON 9099C......CDSS inspection report, February 24, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250219084240

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly handle resident's wound care. Due to staff neglect, resident's wound worsened while in care. Staff did not note changes in resident's medical condition. Staff did not seek resident timely medical attention. Staff did not provide resident's family with a copy of the resident's wound care plan. Facility retained a resident requiring a higher level of care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit at the facility regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Cynthia Leon and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 11/20/23 LPA Rea conducted an initial investigation visit and requested some documents. On 8/29/24 LPA Flores was assigned the investigation. On 9/3/24 LPA Flores conducted interviews over the phone with facility’s administrator and resident #1(R1)’s family representative and requested facility records and medical records. On 9/6/24 LPA interviewed Hospice care staff and requested R1’s medical records. On 9/24/24 LPA conducted interviews with 9 residents over the phone. On 9/25/24 LPA conducted an additional interview with one resident. On 10/7/24 LPA interviewed 3 staff over the phone. On 10/9/24 LPA interviewed 2 staff over the phone. On 10/12/24 LPA delivered findings for this complaint. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiateCDSS inspection report, October 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231115111536
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not keep the facility free from pest.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Trueman met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. At today's visit 07/02/24, LPA has completed the following: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1- #3 (S1-S3) and Residents #1-#8 (R1-R8). LPA toured the physical plant including the outside gardens and along the walls. LPA inspected the facilities food supply, kitchen area and dining room, LPA reviewed documentation of pest control services contracted by the facility for the last 2 months. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation Staff do not keep the facility free from pest, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed that 8 out of 8 residents stated that the food service is good and that they had never observed roaches, rodents or flies and had not been told by anyoneCDSS inspection report, July 2, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240627153804
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not keep the facility free from pest Staff do not properly sanitize kitchen items Staff do not keep the facility free from mildew Staff do not follow proper food handling techniques
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
*** This report supersedes report dated 5/2/24 to revise (1) of (4) allegations to an accurate description and provide additional details in the report. Findings delivered have not changed*** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit for the allegation(s) listed above to redeliver findings. LPA Villalobos met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. As of todays, LPA has completed the following: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1-#8 (S1-S8) and Residents #1-#10 (R1-R10), LPA toured the physical plant including the outside gardens and along the walls, LPA inspected the facilities food supply, kitchen area and dinging room, LPA reviewed documentation of pest control services contracted by the facility for the last month, and reviewed work orders requested by facility residents for the last month. The investigation revealed the following: ContCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240425201839
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not keep the facility free from rodents Staff do not properly sanitize kitchen items Staff do not keep the facility free from mildew Staff do not follow proper food handling techniques
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Villalobos met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA conducted the following on todays visit: LPA collected a copy of the staff and resident roster, LPA Interviewed Staff #1-#8 (S1-S8) and Residents #1-#10 (R1-R10), LPA toured the physcial plant including the outside gardens and along the walls, LPA inspected the facilities food supply and kitchen area, LPA reviewed documentation of pest control services contracted by the facility for the last month, and reviewed work orders requested by facility residents for the last month. The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 2, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240425201839
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedWrongful Eviction.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Villalobos met with Administrator Kay Cano and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA conducted the following: Interviewed staff #1-#6 (S1-S6), Interviewed residents #1-#6 (R1-R6) , interviewed R1 and R2's Responsible Party (W1), collected copies of the staff and resident roster, and collected and reviewed documents from R1 and R2's file. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation "Wrongful Eviction" it was alleged that the facility is wrongfully evicting R1 and R2 due to false belief that the residents are unable to follow facility policies... Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 19, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240312142800

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to the facility listed above to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation of "Staff is not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident". Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Administrator Kay Cano and the reason for the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/20/2021 LPA Alma Gonzalez conducted an interview with Executive Director Brodey De Borde, Health and Wellness Director Laura Sanchez at 2:15pm, R1's Private Caregiver, reviewed R1's facility file and collected copies of the following documents: Physician's Report, Hospice agency physician's orders and obtained copies of Staff and Residents Rosters • Physicians Report for R1 • Hospice Records • R1 Medication List UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 13, 2023 · control 28-AS-20211011093000
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision to a resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 01/30/2023. This report is being amended to add additional information and statements. No other changes have been made to the report. Investigation findings on this report remain the same. **** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted an unannounced 10-day initial complaint visit regarding the above stated allegation. LPA met with Kay Cano, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA reviewed and obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters, Staff schedule, Facility's elopement/missing resident policy, Resident #1 (R1) files such as: Physician's Reports (2/07/2020 & 1/05/2023), Health & Services Plan, Residence and Care Agreement, and Incident Report. LPA interviewed Resident #1 (R1) - Resident #6 (R6) and Staff #1 (S1) - Staff #6 (S6). The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegaCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230123161153

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(801) 815-0808
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Pasadena Highlands? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.