Savant Of Norwalk · License #198603172 · 11515 Firestone Blvd, Norwalk, CA · (562) 379-9200 Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Savant Of Norwalk is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Norwalk, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603172, licensed for 80 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 51 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated November 14, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
✓Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 80 residents
✓Dementia / memory careVerified in record
✓Hospice careApproved for 30 residents
✓Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents
“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.
Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 80 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ARE 1,3,5,7,9. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 30.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026
“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 59 times and filed 51 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 14, 2025.
Most recent state visit
November 14, 2025
Occupancy at the August 18, 2023 visit
74 of 80 beds
The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 5, 2022 to August 18, 2023. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (19). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
202412 state visits · 12 documents
Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
20239 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 8, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not showering resident timely Staff are not getting resident out of bed Staff are not providing resident with special diet Staff are not offering food if resident misses meals due to dialysis
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a follow up complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Elizabeth Martinez Assistant Administrator of the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Chanel Sanchez arrived shortly thereafter. The investigation revealed the following: during the initial visit conducted on 04/27/2023, LPA Kruz Long conducted a tour of the facility, obtained staff and client files, obtained Resident #1's (R1) Records (Physician Report, FACE Sheet, Admission Record, Resident Assessment Form, Shower Log), and also interviewed R1 and the Administrator. During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza interviewed Residents #2 - 9 (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9) and Staff #1 - 6 (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6) . LPA attempted to interview Resident R1, however R1 moved out of the facility and into a Skilled Nursing Facility on 6/9/2023. LPA also obtained copies of the following documentation for C#1: Most Recent Shower Logsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230421144604
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints41typical 7
State visits on file59typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo(2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.
Yes — Savant Of Norwalk is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Norwalk (Los Angeles County): California license #198603172, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 80 residents. State records list 51 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated November 14, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Savant Of Norwalk care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Savant Of Norwalk with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 80 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ARE 1,3,5,7,9. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 30.
How much does Savant Of Norwalk cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Savant Of Norwalk's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Savant Of Norwalk accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Savant Of Norwalk through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
74 of 80 beds occupied (93%) when the state visited on August 18, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Savant Of Norwalk?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 59 state visits and 51 dated documents since 2021 for Savant Of Norwalk; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 18, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not showering resident timely Staff are not getting resident out of bed Staff are not providing resident with special diet Staff are not offering food if resident misses meals due to dialysis
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a follow up complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Elizabeth Martinez Assistant Administrator of the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Chanel Sanchez arrived shortly thereafter. The investigation revealed the following: during the initial visit conducted on 04/27/2023, LPA Kruz Long conducted a tour of the facility, obtained staff and client files, obtained Resident #1's (R1) Records (Physician Report, FACE Sheet, Admission Record, Resident Assessment Form, Shower Log), and also interviewed R1 and the Administrator. During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza interviewed Residents #2 - 9 (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9) and Staff #1 - 6 (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6) . LPA attempted to interview Resident R1, however R1 moved out of the facility and into a Skilled Nursing Facility on 6/9/2023. LPA also obtained copies of the following documentation for C#1: Most Recent Shower Logs— CDSS inspection report, August 18, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230421144604
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not report unusual incidents as required Staff did not adhere to resident's admission agreement regarding payments Resident has an exposed pipe in his bedroom
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an initial complaint visit in response to the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Chanel Sanchez, and Elizabeth Martinez, Business Office Manager. Regarding the allegation that: Staff did not report unusual incidents as required. The investigation consisted of interviews with Reporting Party, Administrator, and Staff #1 and review of staff roster, and resident roster. Reporting Party (RP) stated that there was an altercation in October 2022, involving resident #1 and resident #2.The RP also stated that the incident was observed by Staff #2 and Staff #3, and was not reported as required. Resident #1 and Resident #2 are no longer residents of the facility, and were not interviewed. Staff #2 is no longer working at the facility and was not interviewed. Staff #3 was not working at the facility when the alleged incident occured. Staff #3 began working at the facility in February 2023, and therefore was not at the facili— CDSS inspection report, July 31, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230727155003
Allegation the state reviewedWrongful Eviction. Staff did not safeguard resident's belongings. Staff do not ensure that resident is accorded privacy Staff do not ensure that resident is receiving medical attention as needed. Staff do not ensure that resident's room is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Staff do not respond to requests for communication about resident in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
**** This amended report supersedes report dated 06/12/2023. It was created to remove identifing information. The additional revision did not change any other aspects of the report and all aspects including the findings remain the same. *** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator Chanel Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: LPA conducted interviews with Administrator Chanel Sanchez, Staff 1-6 (S1-6) and Resident 1-7 (R1-7). LPA collected copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. LPA also reviewed R1 admission agreement, physicians report, other pertinent medical records for R1, and sign in/sign out sheets. LPA also conducted a tour of facility which included lobby, random rooms, outside patio area, and common areas. (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, June 12, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230608093038
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not prevent residents from smoking in undesignated smoking areas Staff do not maintain facility in good repair Staff do not maintain passageway free from obstruction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Chanel Sanchez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: LPA conducted interviews with Administrator Chanel Sanchez, Staff 1-6 (S1-6) and Resident 1-7 (R1-7). LPA collected copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. LPA also conducted a tour of facility which included lobby, dining room, medication room, outside patio area, fitness room (located on the 2nd floor), common areas on both 1st and 2nd floors, and two designated smoking areas. LPA additionally toured a random selection of resident rooms. (See LIC9099C for continuation) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, May 23, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230517140233
Allegation the state reviewedResident with Covid-19 is not getting sufficient care. Food prepared and served to resident was unsafe. Facility is dirty. Untrained staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 04/24/23 stemming from initial complaint visit conducted by LPA Wesley on 01/13/2022. LPA was met by Staff(S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and S1 were later met by Administrator Chanel Sanchez. LPA conducted a physical tour of facility, requested, and obtained Personnel Report (LIC 500), Resident Roster, copy of Resident 1(R1) Face sheet and other pertinent documents regarding this investigation. See LIC 9099-C for continuation Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, April 24, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220104123415
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent strangers from breaking into residents room. Staff did not notify the police of incident. Staff did not notify residents authorized representative of incident. Financial fraud. Facility phone is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 04/24/23 stemming from initial complaint visit conducted by LPA Wesley on 03/22/2022. LPA was met by Staff(S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and S1 were later met by Administrator Chanel Sanchez. LPA conducted a physical tour of facility, requested, and obtained Personnel Report (LIC 500), Resident Roster, copy of Resident 1(R1) Face sheet and other pertinent documents regarding this investigation. See LIC 9099-C for continuation Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, April 24, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220318145550
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA Flores met with Elizabeth Martinez - Assistant Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested copies of staff and resident roster. LPA conducted interviews with resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6) and staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5), reviewed file for resident #7(R7) and requested copies of admission agreement, physician's report, face sheet, authorization agreement for payment, preplacement appraisal information, assisted living waiver form, identification and emergency information, letter of notification of increase, acknowledgement of discharge and payment plan. LPA requested a copy of in-service training on resident rights. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, April 7, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230330100849
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mismanaging residents medication. Staff are not providing adequate food service. Staff did not safeguard residents belongings. Staff did not prevent resident from making inappropriate comments towards another resident. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Facility phone is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings from previous subsequent complaint visit on 03/02/23, stemming from initial 10-day complaint visit conducted on 06/08/2021, by LPA Wesley and LPA Mora. LPA Ramirez was met by Administrator Chanel Sanchez and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of: An inspection of the interior and exterior physical plant was conducted. Staff (S1-S5) and residents (R1- R4) were interviewed. Resident (R1) was not present and was interviewed telephonically. Resident file documents: [Identification and Emergency Information, Preplacement Appraisal, and Physician's Reports, medication orders, any other pertinent documents that may assist in this investigation were reviewed and obtained. LPA requested and obtained: LIC 500 Personnel Report, and Resident roster. See LIC 9099-C for continuation. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, March 3, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210611101304
Allegation the state reviewedResident denied rent refund
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Calderon conducted subsequent complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Elizabeth Martinez and explained the purpose for todays visit. On 2/17/22, LPA Nicol Wesley conducted the initial investigation. LPA Wesley requested copy of the: staff roster, resident roster, copy of admission agreement, Unusual Incident Report(SIR) for month a January. LPA Wesley interviewed staff and attempted to interview resident #1. On 2/27/23, the subsequent visit by LPA Calderon consisted the following: LPA Calderon requested copy of the: staff roster, resident roster, Resident #1 (R1) Facesheet, Admission Agreement, Physician Report, Acknowledgement of Discharge Form, Supporting Email Documentation, and check stub issued to R1. LPA Calderon interviewed Assistant Administrator Elizabeth Martiniez, and telephonically interviewed R1 and Financial Representative of R1. (Continuation on 9099-C) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, February 27, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220211124405
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure that resident received their dialysis treatment while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kruz Long conducted an unannounced complaint investigation at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Chanel Sanchez (Executive Director) and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the Staff/Resident rosters, hospital records, shift records and physician's order report. LPA interviewed Staff #1, #2 in the conference room, interviewed Staff #3 in the medication room and interviewed Residents #1 to #7 in various locations of the facility. In regards to the allegation: Facility staff did not ensure that resident received their dialysis treatment while in care. Interviews with Staff and Resident indicate Resident #1 refused to attend dialysis treatments on numerous occasions. Transportation service is automatically scheduled by the dialysis center. Record review indicate refusals are documented. Facility Staff notified the dialysis center and Resident #1's doctor after each refusal. Interviews with 6 of 7 Residents— CDSS inspection report, January 31, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230126120043
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing residents with adequate food service. Staff do not treat residents with dignity.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted unannounced 10-day complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. During today’s visit, LPA met with and explained the purpose of today's visit to Administrator assistant, Elizabeth Martinez. At the end of the visit, LPA met with Administrator, Lisa Pham. Investigation consisted of the following: interviews of Staff from Staff #1 through Staff #5; interviews of residents from resident #1 through resident #7; facility record reviews, and a facility tour. LPA obtained copies of staff and resident rosters; and resident files for resident #1 (R1) with relevant information. The investigation revealed the following: In regard to allegation "staff are not providing residents with adequate food service", it was alleged that facility was not providing the 2nd round of food to resident#1 when resident requested more food. (-continued in LIC 9099 C-) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, November 29, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221121101152
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not adhere to Admissions Agreement
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores and Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Alize Solar Med Tech and explained the reason for the visit. Corporate Board Member Cynthia Flores arrived 15 minutes after. The investigation consisted of the following: On 5/10/22 LPA Flores conducted a complaint investigation visit and requested a resident/staff roster. LPA conducted interviews with resident #1(R1), #2(R2), #3(R3), #4(R4), staff #1(S1), #2(S2),#3(S3)#4(S4). LPA requested copies of admission's agreement, face sheets, physician's reports, and notices provided to residents for R1,R2,R3,R4. LPA conducted a tour of supplies storages in first and second floor and medication room. On 11/1/22 LPAs conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, November 1, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220503160955
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident with admissions agreement when requested.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an initial complaint visit regarding the allegations above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Elizabeth Martinez and the purpose of the visit was discussed. On todays visit LPA toured the physical plant. LPA reviewed and collected copies of files from resident #1's (R1) file. LPA interviewed residents #1-#5 (R1-R5) and staff #1-#4 (S1-S4) during todays visit. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation "Staff did not provide resident with admissions agreement when requested." it was alleged that R1 requested a copy of their admissions agreement and explanation for how monthly rent is calculated but did not receive it. (4) of (4) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (4) of (5) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 31, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221025093815
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist resident with self-administration medication. Staff do not repond to resident's call for assistance.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)/Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Asst. Administrator (A2: Elizabeth Martinez). LPA/RA spoke to A2 prior to entering the facility to conduct a risk assessment. A2 informed LPA/RA that the facility has no COVID cases nor do any of the residents or staff have symptoms. The purpose for today’s visit is to conduct a subsequent visit and deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation(s). An initial 10-Day visit was conducted by LPA Nicol Wesley on 01/13/22 who interviewed staff and resident #1. LPA/RA Ceniceros interviewed (between 1:00 p.m - 1:45 p.m.) three (3) staff members and three (3) residents in care. LPA/RA reviewed (between 1:45 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.) the requested documents: Face Sheet (dated 12/31/21), Emergency I.D. & Information (dated 01/13/22), Physician’s Report (12/21/21), Medication Administrator Record (January 2022), Acknowledgement of Discharge (dated 01/— CDSS inspection report, October 27, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220112084432
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure that resident was properly dressed at night.. Staff member was verbally abusive toward resident. Facility does not provide a safe environment for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/25/22 at 9:00 A.M., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. Upon arrival LPA met with Lisa Pham (Administrator) and Elizabeth Martinez (Assistant Administrator). LPA explained the purpose of the visit and toured the facility with Assistant Administrator. During today’s visit LPA toured the facility, reviewed files of four residents (R1- R4) and obtained resident/ staff roster, R1 face sheet, physician report and admission agreement. LPA interviewed four residents (R1- R5), Administrator and three staff (S1- S3). The investigation reveals the following: Regarding "Facility staff did not ensure that resident was properly dressed at night" it was alleged that staff did not dress S1 for the night. Report conintued on 9099c Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, July 25, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220719124719
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not provide hygiene items for residents Facility does not maintain testing equipment for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Angelica Amador Activity Director and explained the reason for the visit. Assistant administrator Elizabeth Martinez arrived 15 minutes later. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a resident/staff roster. LPA conducted interviews with resident #1(R1), #2(R2), #3(R3), #4(R4), staff #1(S1), #2(S2),#3(S3)#4(S4). LPA requested copies of admission's agreement, face sheets, physician's reports, and notices provided to residents for R1,R2,R3,R4. LPA conducted a tour of supplies storages in first and second floor and medication room. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility does not provide hygiene items for residents. It is alleged the facility does not provide residents with razors. 4 out of 4 residents stated to receive basic hygiene supplies such as shampoo,— CDSS inspection report, May 10, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220503160955
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has insufficient staffing to meet the residents' needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted a subsequent 10 day complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Elizabeth Martinez and Administrator Lisa Pham and discussed the purpose for today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed residents #1-#4 (S1-S4) between 10:39 am-12:14pm, LPA Toured the physical plant with Assistant Administrator and found no health or safety concerns. LPA Interviewed Administrator and Assistant Administrator from 12:14-12:48pm. LPA also reviewed the following documents: staff roster, resident roster, LPA interviewed Staff #1 -Staff #4 (SI-S4) from 1:37 - 2:58pm The Investigation revealed the following: In regard to the allegation, "Facility has insufficient staffing to meet the residents' need" Administrator and Assistant Administrator denied the allegations and (4) of (4) staff interviewed denied the allegations. The staff interview stated that all residents’ needs a— CDSS inspection report, March 2, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211229160311
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide a safe environment. Resident is being over medicated. Resident not being provided adequate hygiene services. Staff did not safeguard resident personal information.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unannounced complaint viist to investigate the above allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Assistant Administrator Elizabeth Martinez and discused the purpose of the visit. Shortly after, the administrator Lisa Pham arrived. The investigation consisted of the following: On today's visit, LPA interviewed four residents (R2-R5) , assistant adminstrator, administrator and three staff (S1-S3). The following documents were collected which included: staff and resident roster and documents for Resident#1 (R1) - face sheet, physicaian report, Medication Adminsitration Record (MARs), Admission agreement and Pre-Placmenet. LPA also toured R1's room. The investigation revealed of the following: Allegation#1 "Faciltiy staff did not provide a safe environment." LPA interviewed four residents and all reported they feel safe living in the facility. (See LIC 9099C for continuation) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, March 2, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220224103531
Allegation the state reviewedStaff prevents resident from having access to wheelchair while in care. Resident's diapering needs are not being met. Resident is not treated with dignity or respect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unanncounced complaint visit to address the above allegations. LPA met with Corporate Assitant Cynthia Flores and explained the purpose of the visit and she also assisted LPA with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed assistant administrator and four staff (S1-S4), four residents (R2-R5) and obtained documents included resdient rosters, staff rosters and copy of Resident#1 (R1) face sheet, preplacement appraisal information and physician report. The investigation revealed of the following: Allegation#1 "Staff prevents resident from having access to wheelchair while in care." LPA interviewed four residents and all reported that they can move their wheelchair all around the facility. They do have any restrictions on that. LPA interviewed staff and all denied the allegation and reported the residents can even bring the wheelchair back to their room and bedside. (See LIC9099C for continuation) Un— CDSS inspection report, January 5, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211229154455
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 59 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →