Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198602192, licensed for 183 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 34 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 13, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 183 residents · Los Angeles, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198602192, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
325 S Boyle Ave · Los Angeles, Los Angeles County
Phone
(323) 263-9651
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 136 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 47 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR 136 NON-AMBULATORY AND 47 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 39 times and filed 34 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 13, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 13, 2026
Occupancy at the May 29, 2025 visit
128 of 183 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 22, 2023 to May 29, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (8), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 31 of 34 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 6 documents
Jul 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 10 documents
Aug 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure hot water was available at the facility for residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Mayra Cota, conducted an initial unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Dennis Robeniol, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA, Cota, obtained copies of client and staff rosters, toured common areas of the facility, inspected 14 resident rooms/bathrooms and interviewed Resident 1 - Resident 9 (R1-R9) and Staff 1 - Staff 5. ***Continues on LIC 9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250522082132
Mar 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the facility generators were not in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Executive Director Dennis Robeniol. The purpose for the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident roster. LPA interviewed Executive Director Dennis Robeniol and Staff S1. LPA and Staff S1 toured the exterior of the facility where the generators for the facility are located. In regards to the allegation Staff did not ensure the facility generators were not in disrepair, based on interviews conducted, tour conducted and information gathered it was revealed by the Executive Director that the generators have been non-operable for at least a year. Stated that the copper wires connected to the generators were stolen by individuals from outside the facility. Said the blackout was about 2 hours in the facility. Interview with Staff S1 who stated that all the wiring was stolen and that the generators have been non-operablthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250228153319
Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident’s needs.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Mayra Cota and Blanca Gonzalez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Dennis Robeniol, Execitive Director and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the facility, reviewed file and records of Resident #1 (R1) and obtained copies of the following documents: Face Sheet, Needs and Service Plan, Resident Assessment, Admissions Agreement, Physician’s Report, Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2024, Admission Orders (medication), photo of purchase receipt for glucometer and test strips, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), Unusual Incident Report (11/14/24) and Admission Record and Order Summary Report from convalescent hospital. Staff also provided staff and resident rosters. LPA conducted interviews with residents 1-9 (R1-R9), staff 1-4 (S1-S4), and convalescent hospital staff (CS). ***Continues on Lthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241118081448
Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper infection control protocols with residents in care. Licensee is not ensuring that the facility is kept free from bed bugs. Facility is in disrepair. Licensee does not ensure facility serves food of good quality and quantity to residents in care. Facility is not adhering to resident(s)' Admission Agreement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted a subsequent complain visit in regard to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jina Malekarkissians and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 12/09/2024, LPA interviewed Staff #1- Staff #4, Residents #1 -Residents #5, and toured the facility, LPA obtained copies of the following documents: personnel report LIC 500, resident roster, invoice for pest control, invoices for food purchased, food menu, and physicians reports along with narrative report for three (3) residents. During todays visit LPA Gutierrez interviewed Residents #6- Residents #9, and Staff #5- Staff #6 and obtained copies of elevator maintenance repair receipts, and room change letters. SEE LIC 9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241204135046
Jan 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually abused while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Tomoko Hino, Marketing Director and Alejandro Lozoya, Business Office Manager and explained the purpose of today’s visit. LPA spoke with Jina Maleksarkissian, Executive Director on the phone and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 12/24/2024, LPA Cota conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit and obtained relevant documentation. During today's visit, LPA Pena obtained staff & resident rosters, Facility's Abuse Neglect and Exploitation Policy, Resident #1 (R1) files such as: Identification and Emergency Information (Face sheet), Pre Admission Application, Resident Assessment, Admission Agreement, Physician's report, Kaiser Hospital Discharge record (12/24/2024), Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Nov. 2024-Jan. 2025 and Incident Report (12/22/2024). LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1)-Staff #5 (S5) and Resident #1 (R1)-Resident #12 (R12). LPA requested copthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241223145347
202410 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided with a comfortable environment while in care. Facility is in disrepair.

During today's visit, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted an initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Tomoko Hino, Marketing Director. Administrator Jina Malesarkissians arrived shortly thereafter. The inspection consisted of the following: LPA conducted a tour of facility including kitchen, dining room, common areas. LPA obtained staff and resident rosters, a copy of documents pertaining to this complaint, interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 3 (S1 - S3) and Resident 1 - Resident 12 (R1 - R12). Continue 9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240905151659
Jun 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate supervision to residents. Staff yell at residents. Staff do not treat residents with respect. Staff did not safeguard residents' personal belongings. Staff are not properly dispensing medication as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. The purpose of the visit was explained to new Executive Director Jina Maleksarkissians. The investigation consisted of the following: On11/28/23, 2/8/24, and 5/9/24 LPA visited the facility to investigate complaint allegations. On 2/8/24, findings were delivered on 4 allegations. Each visit consisted of physical plant observations, records review, and interviews. Resident file documents were requested and obtained, which included [Medication Administration Records [MARs Sep. 2023- Nov. 2023], Appraisals, Physician's Reports, incident reports] and other relevant documents. Copies of the Neurocognitive Disorder Care Plan of of Operation, Designation of Facility Responsibility, Administrator Certificate, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident rosters were obtained. During the course of the investigation, pictures and video evidence was obtained. ***Narrative summarythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231120121606
May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents Facility is in disrepair

During today's visit, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Janice Shimozawa, Front Desk Receptionist for the facility, and was granted entrance. Current Administrator Jina Malesarkissians arrived shortly thereafter. The inspection consisted of the following: LPA obtained staff and resident rosters, a copy of the sketch of the facility, interviewed residents #1 - 10 (R1 - R10), and staff #1 - 4 (S1 - S4). The inspection revealed the following: In regards to the allegation that "Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents," it is alleged that homeless people have been entering the facility campus by cutting holes in fencing that surrounds the facility, and they have been squatting in a large abandoned building formerly known as the Intermediate Care Facility (ICF) building that stands next to the main assisted living building for the facility as well as in bathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240501153246
May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator is not at the facility for the required amount of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Administrator, Jina Maleksarkissian. The purpose for the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident roster. LPA also reviewed the administrator's file and interviewed the administrator, 6 staff and 5 residents. For allegation, administrator is not at the facility for the required amount of time. It is alleged that the administrator is not available for residents and staff and is not in the building. LPA interviewed the administrator who started on 2/21/24. She stated she works Monday through Friday, 9:30am - 5pm, and is available on call. She is normally in the building except when she has any business meetings or business developments. She will attend the meeting and return to the community right after. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240315143603
Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff interfere with resident's sleep. Staff do not properly store residents' personal hygiene care items.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. The purpose of the visit was explained to receptionist Janice Shimozawa. The facility does not currently have an Executive Director. Rodora Marijna Merana arrived later and assisted with today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 11/28/2023, LPA conducted a tour of the facility with focus on the Memory Care Units and one staff was interviewed. The Neurocognitive Disorder Care Plan of of Operation, Designation of Facility Responsibility,Personnel Records and training, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident rosters were obtained. Photographs were taken of the storage rooms were resident's hygiene products were being stored. During today's visit, LPA obtained Dementia Care Plan of Operation [Service Plans, Resident Dining, Northstar Food Service, and kitchen meal time schedule. A tour of the facility and Memory Care Unit was conducted, 7 staff were intethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231120121606
Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple falls due to staff neglect Staff did not follow protocol regarding resident falling Staff administered resident medications not on medication list Facility staff did not report resident's fall to the proper agencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Tomoko Hino and explained the reason for the visit. Whitney Blake Regional Vice President of Operations and Sale for North Star was notified of the reason of the visit via phone. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff and resident roster. Interviewed administrator, 5 staff, 8 residents, reviewed resident’s #1(R1) file, staff provided a copy of R1’s file and incident reports for incidents on 1/15/24 and 1/24/24. Interview hospice services over the phone. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident sustained multiple falls due to staff neglect. It is alleged R1 has a history of falls and fell on 1/15/24 and 1/24/24. Interviews with staff revealed R1 resided at the assisted living prior to moving to their transitional memory care unit. While living at the assisted living R1 had susthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240129142303
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not safeguarding resident’s personal belongings. Staff not preventing resident’s room from getting broken in.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an initial complaint visit in response to the allegation(s) listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Daniel Konishi, who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that : Staff are not safeguarding resident’s personal belongings. The investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - Staff #3, and Resident #1 - Resident #6, and review of Resident #1's file. Administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that staff do safeguard residents personal belongings. Administrator and staff stated that resident #1 has expressed concerns that their personal belongings are missing, and staff have conducted an internal investigation. Administrator and staff stated that some of the items that were said to be missing, were located in resident #1's room. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Five out of six residents interviewed stated that their belongings are safeguthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230817162758
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations7typical 1
Type B citations12typical 1
Substantiated complaints20typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file39typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202656020258103202410125202344020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (323) 263-9651

Is Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles licensed?

Yes — Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Angeles (Los Angeles County): California license #198602192, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 183 residents. State records list 34 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 13, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR 136 NON-AMBULATORY AND 47 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.

How much does Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

128 of 183 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on May 29, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 39 state visits and 34 dated documents since 2021 for Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 29, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure hot water was available at the facility for residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Mayra Cota, conducted an initial unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Dennis Robeniol, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA, Cota, obtained copies of client and staff rosters, toured common areas of the facility, inspected 14 resident rooms/bathrooms and interviewed Resident 1 - Resident 9 (R1-R9) and Staff 1 - Staff 5. ***Continues on LIC 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 29, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250522082132
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure the facility generators were not in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Executive Director Dennis Robeniol. The purpose for the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident roster. LPA interviewed Executive Director Dennis Robeniol and Staff S1. LPA and Staff S1 toured the exterior of the facility where the generators for the facility are located. In regards to the allegation Staff did not ensure the facility generators were not in disrepair, based on interviews conducted, tour conducted and information gathered it was revealed by the Executive Director that the generators have been non-operable for at least a year. Stated that the copper wires connected to the generators were stolen by individuals from outside the facility. Said the blackout was about 2 hours in the facility. Interview with Staff S1 who stated that all the wiring was stolen and that the generators have been non-operablCDSS inspection report, March 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250228153319
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident’s needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Mayra Cota and Blanca Gonzalez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Dennis Robeniol, Execitive Director and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the facility, reviewed file and records of Resident #1 (R1) and obtained copies of the following documents: Face Sheet, Needs and Service Plan, Resident Assessment, Admissions Agreement, Physician’s Report, Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2024, Admission Orders (medication), photo of purchase receipt for glucometer and test strips, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), Unusual Incident Report (11/14/24) and Admission Record and Order Summary Report from convalescent hospital. Staff also provided staff and resident rosters. LPA conducted interviews with residents 1-9 (R1-R9), staff 1-4 (S1-S4), and convalescent hospital staff (CS). ***Continues on LCDSS inspection report, February 13, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241118081448
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following proper infection control protocols with residents in care. Licensee is not ensuring that the facility is kept free from bed bugs. Facility is in disrepair. Licensee does not ensure facility serves food of good quality and quantity to residents in care. Facility is not adhering to resident(s)' Admission Agreement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted a subsequent complain visit in regard to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jina Malekarkissians and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 12/09/2024, LPA interviewed Staff #1- Staff #4, Residents #1 -Residents #5, and toured the facility, LPA obtained copies of the following documents: personnel report LIC 500, resident roster, invoice for pest control, invoices for food purchased, food menu, and physicians reports along with narrative report for three (3) residents. During todays visit LPA Gutierrez interviewed Residents #6- Residents #9, and Staff #5- Staff #6 and obtained copies of elevator maintenance repair receipts, and room change letters. SEE LIC 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 4, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241204135046
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was sexually abused while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Tomoko Hino, Marketing Director and Alejandro Lozoya, Business Office Manager and explained the purpose of today’s visit. LPA spoke with Jina Maleksarkissian, Executive Director on the phone and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 12/24/2024, LPA Cota conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit and obtained relevant documentation. During today's visit, LPA Pena obtained staff & resident rosters, Facility's Abuse Neglect and Exploitation Policy, Resident #1 (R1) files such as: Identification and Emergency Information (Face sheet), Pre Admission Application, Resident Assessment, Admission Agreement, Physician's report, Kaiser Hospital Discharge record (12/24/2024), Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Nov. 2024-Jan. 2025 and Incident Report (12/22/2024). LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1)-Staff #5 (S5) and Resident #1 (R1)-Resident #12 (R12). LPA requested copCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241223145347

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that residents are provided with a comfortable environment while in care. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
During today's visit, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted an initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Tomoko Hino, Marketing Director. Administrator Jina Malesarkissians arrived shortly thereafter. The inspection consisted of the following: LPA conducted a tour of facility including kitchen, dining room, common areas. LPA obtained staff and resident rosters, a copy of documents pertaining to this complaint, interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 3 (S1 - S3) and Resident 1 - Resident 12 (R1 - R12). Continue 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240905151659
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing adequate supervision to residents. Staff yell at residents. Staff do not treat residents with respect. Staff did not safeguard residents' personal belongings. Staff are not properly dispensing medication as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. The purpose of the visit was explained to new Executive Director Jina Maleksarkissians. The investigation consisted of the following: On11/28/23, 2/8/24, and 5/9/24 LPA visited the facility to investigate complaint allegations. On 2/8/24, findings were delivered on 4 allegations. Each visit consisted of physical plant observations, records review, and interviews. Resident file documents were requested and obtained, which included [Medication Administration Records [MARs Sep. 2023- Nov. 2023], Appraisals, Physician's Reports, incident reports] and other relevant documents. Copies of the Neurocognitive Disorder Care Plan of of Operation, Designation of Facility Responsibility, Administrator Certificate, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident rosters were obtained. During the course of the investigation, pictures and video evidence was obtained. ***Narrative summaryCDSS inspection report, May 17, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231120121606
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents Facility is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
During today's visit, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Janice Shimozawa, Front Desk Receptionist for the facility, and was granted entrance. Current Administrator Jina Malesarkissians arrived shortly thereafter. The inspection consisted of the following: LPA obtained staff and resident rosters, a copy of the sketch of the facility, interviewed residents #1 - 10 (R1 - R10), and staff #1 - 4 (S1 - S4). The inspection revealed the following: In regards to the allegation that "Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents," it is alleged that homeless people have been entering the facility campus by cutting holes in fencing that surrounds the facility, and they have been squatting in a large abandoned building formerly known as the Intermediate Care Facility (ICF) building that stands next to the main assisted living building for the facility as well as in baCDSS inspection report, May 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240501153246
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator is not at the facility for the required amount of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Administrator, Jina Maleksarkissian. The purpose for the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff and resident roster. LPA also reviewed the administrator's file and interviewed the administrator, 6 staff and 5 residents. For allegation, administrator is not at the facility for the required amount of time. It is alleged that the administrator is not available for residents and staff and is not in the building. LPA interviewed the administrator who started on 2/21/24. She stated she works Monday through Friday, 9:30am - 5pm, and is available on call. She is normally in the building except when she has any business meetings or business developments. She will attend the meeting and return to the community right after. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 20, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240315143603
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff interfere with resident's sleep. Staff do not properly store residents' personal hygiene care items.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. The purpose of the visit was explained to receptionist Janice Shimozawa. The facility does not currently have an Executive Director. Rodora Marijna Merana arrived later and assisted with today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 11/28/2023, LPA conducted a tour of the facility with focus on the Memory Care Units and one staff was interviewed. The Neurocognitive Disorder Care Plan of of Operation, Designation of Facility Responsibility,Personnel Records and training, LIC 500 Personnel Report, and resident rosters were obtained. Photographs were taken of the storage rooms were resident's hygiene products were being stored. During today's visit, LPA obtained Dementia Care Plan of Operation [Service Plans, Resident Dining, Northstar Food Service, and kitchen meal time schedule. A tour of the facility and Memory Care Unit was conducted, 7 staff were inteCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231120121606
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple falls due to staff neglect Staff did not follow protocol regarding resident falling Staff administered resident medications not on medication list Facility staff did not report resident's fall to the proper agencies
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Tomoko Hino and explained the reason for the visit. Whitney Blake Regional Vice President of Operations and Sale for North Star was notified of the reason of the visit via phone. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff and resident roster. Interviewed administrator, 5 staff, 8 residents, reviewed resident’s #1(R1) file, staff provided a copy of R1’s file and incident reports for incidents on 1/15/24 and 1/24/24. Interview hospice services over the phone. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident sustained multiple falls due to staff neglect. It is alleged R1 has a history of falls and fell on 1/15/24 and 1/24/24. Interviews with staff revealed R1 resided at the assisted living prior to moving to their transitional memory care unit. While living at the assisted living R1 had susCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240129142303

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not safeguarding resident’s personal belongings. Staff not preventing resident’s room from getting broken in.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an initial complaint visit in response to the allegation(s) listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Daniel Konishi, who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that : Staff are not safeguarding resident’s personal belongings. The investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - Staff #3, and Resident #1 - Resident #6, and review of Resident #1's file. Administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that staff do safeguard residents personal belongings. Administrator and staff stated that resident #1 has expressed concerns that their personal belongings are missing, and staff have conducted an internal investigation. Administrator and staff stated that some of the items that were said to be missing, were located in resident #1's room. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Five out of six residents interviewed stated that their belongings are safeguCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230817162758

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 39 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
12
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
20
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
39
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(323) 263-9651
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sakura Gardens At Los Angeles? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.