Watermark At Westwood Village, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198320127, licensed for 237 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 28 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Watermark At Westwood Village, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 237 residents · Los Angeles, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198320127, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
947 Tiverton Avenue · Los Angeles, Los Angeles County
Phone
(310) 208-4590
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 237 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 25 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 237 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 25 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 3RD FLOOR AND BELOW APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. 3RD FLOOR ONLY APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25. NEW MGMT CO. ATSC II LLC EFFECTIVE 01/01/2025.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 28 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 17, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 28, 2026
Occupancy at the August 27, 2025 visit
135 of 237 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 15 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 16, 2021 to August 27, 2025. 15 of the 15 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 15 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 15 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 21 of 28 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not take proper steps to mitigate the spread of a communicable disease.

On 8/27/2025 at approximately 11:45 AM, LPA Alfonso Iniguez conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met Tommy Farid Taheri/Assistant Executive Director. LPA Iniguez explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: LPA conducted the following interviews: Executive Director’s Interview (A#1), Residents Interviews (R#1-R#9) and Staff Interview (S#1-S#10). LPA obtained and reviewed the following documents: Resident Roster dated: 8/27/25, Staff Roster dated: 8/27/25, copy of facility’s Infection Control Plan dated: 7/15/25, Copies of Unusual Incident Report or LIC 624 dated: 8/15/25, 8/17/25, 8/19/25, 8/20/25 and 8/21/25, copy of email sent to the County Department of Public Health dated: 8/20/25. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250820132156
Aug 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure residents’ personal belongings are safely secured. Staff does not ensure facility is in good repair.

On August 03, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Sahar Masarati, the Executive Director of Enrichment, greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegations mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 through Resident #10 (R1-R10), Staff #1 through Staff #7 (S1-S7), and Witness #1 (W1). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 09/01/23 and 07/09/25), the Resident Roster (dated 01/22/25), Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 06/13/25), and Resident #1 (R1)'s service records, as well as other pertinent records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 3, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250116144249
Jul 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Facility staff did not meet resident's oxygen needs.

This report supersedes the previous reports LIC9099 and LIC9099-C, created on May 15, 2025. The findings regarding the complaint remain unchanged. On June 05, 2025, LPA Richard conducted a subsequent visit and met with Senior Executive Director Stephanie Koffman and explained the purpose of this visit. On 5/15/25, at approximately 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman-Senior Executive Director and explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation consisted of the following: The department obtained and reviewed copies of the staff and resident rosters, Resident (R1)’s physician’s report, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record, and Admission Agreement. The department obtained and reviewed the concluded summary of the Los Angeles Fire Department report #1077, the 911 recording from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, and the Los Angeles Police Department report fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 11-AS-20240209102246
May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not comply with facility theft and loss program requirements. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.

On 5/15/24, at approximately 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst-PA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman-Senior Executive Director and explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: LPA conducted the following interviews: Senior Executive Director Interview (A#1), Residents 1 Interview (R#1) and Witness 1 interview (W#1). LPA obtained and reviewed the following documents: Resident Roster dated:5/6/25, Staff Roster dated:3/22/25, Copy of the Health and Safety Code 1569.153 regulation, copy of Los Angeles Police Department Victim’s Supplemental Property Loss Report filled by (R#1) and dated on:8/26/24, Copy Excel spreadsheet of facility Initial Employee Trainings dated:9/20/2024, copy of 2024 facility staff trainings, copy of (R#1)’s of 1st Admissions Agreement dated:6/30/23, copy of (R#1)’s 2nd Admissions Agreement dated: 7/24/24, copy of (R#1)’s Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables or LICthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 11-AS-20240910162855
May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Facility staff did not meet resident's oxygen needs.

On 5/15/24, at approximately 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst-PA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman-Senior Executive Director and explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation consisted of the following: The department obtained and reviewed copies of the staff and resident rosters, Resident (R1)’s physician’s report, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record, and Admission Agreement. The department obtained and reviewed the concluded summary of the Los Angeles Fire Department report #1077, the 911 recording from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, and the Los Angeles Police Department report for the January 31, 2024, incident involving R1. The department obtained and reviewed the Los Angeles County coroner's report and death certificate for R1. The department conducted interviews with residents (R2-R3), staff (S1-S4), and Administrator/Litit Mnatsakanyan (A1), and R1’s private caregiver (W1). Ethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 11-AS-20240209102246
Mar 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff transported clients while under the influence of marijuana.

On 12/30/2024 LPA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman / Senior Executive Director. LPA Iniguez explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: LPA conducted the following interviews: Administrator Interview(A#1), Staff Interviews (S#1-S#6) and Resident’s interviews (R#1-R#5). LPA obtained and reviewed the following documents: Resident’s roster, Personnel roster, copies of November and December resident outing sign up list. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2024 · control 11-AS-20241227134058
Dec 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents pendents are disabled due to transition between new management company.

On 09/18/24 Licensing program analyst (LPA) Lizeth Villegas conducted a subsequent visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Stephanie Koffman as the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 04/25/24 (LPA) Wendy Gibbs conducted initial visit and conducted the following: a tour the facility, pendant test for bedrooms #502 and #608, interviews with staff (S1-S10), and interviews with residents (R1-R4). On 04/25/24 LPA Wendy Gibbs obtained the following documents: staff Roster, resident Roster, email to staff regarding room checks, room check log, death report, needs and service plan, admission evaluation, and physicians report. On 09/18/24 LPA Lizeth Villegas obtained a copy of the staff and resident rosters and conducted a tour, interviews with executive director (ED), and residents #5-10 (R5-R10). The investigation revealed the following: Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024 · control 11-AS-20240419164424
Aug 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following Emergency Disaster Plan protocols.

On 01/17/2024 9:20 AM, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Ulysses Coronel and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Regina Cloyd conducted a complaint investigation at the above facility to investigate the following allegations. LPM and LPA met with Business Office Manager Mariam Gezalian and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Lilit Mnatsakanyan joined the inspection later. The investigation consisted of the following: During today’s investigation LPM, LPA, and staff conducted a tour of the facility which included the 14th floor, 3rd floor (Memory Care), 2nd Floor, and stairwells. LPM and LPA interviewed the Administrator and seven (7) staff members and interviewed 10 out of 101 residents. LPM and LPA reviewed the register of residents, Fire Safety Inc’s Fire Drill Reports conducted on 09/23/23, 10/30/23, 12/08/23, and 12/19/23, Personnel Report (LIC 500), and emergency disaster plan. Continue to LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2024 · control 11-AS-20240110121519
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not follow Covid-19 protocols. Facility is in disrepair.

**This report serves as an amendment to clarify findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created 01/12/2023.** On 10/06/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David España conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegations. LPA met with Lilit E. Mnatsakanyan, Administrator and explained the purpose of this visit was to deliver findings for this complaint. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/05/2022 between 9:30am to 2:48pm, LPA conducted an initial 10-day visit and met with Resident Care Service Director, Kimberly Davis. LPA conducted a tour of the facility. On 12/05/2022 and 01/11/2023 between the hours of 10:12am - 3:00pm LPA completed interviews, requested, and reviewed copies of records. Documents were received at the time of visit. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2023 · control 11-AS-20221201130811
Sep 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not safeguarding resident's personal property. Resident is being financially abused while in care.

On 09/05/2023, at 11:40 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David España met with Administrator, Lilit Mnatsakanyan, to conduct a complaint investigation to address the allegations listed above. LPA España met with Administrator, Lilit Mnatsakanyan and explained the purpose of this visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA España conducted a tour of the facility grounds. LPA España interviewed staff, clients, witnesses, and reviewed records. LPA España requested and reviewed the following documents, client roster, staff roster, and The Watermark at Westwood Village Residential Living Residency Agreement. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not safeguarding resident's personal property.” 4 out of 5 residents interviewed disagreed with the allegation and denied having any issues with facility staff not safeguarding resident's personal property. 7 out of 7 staff (S1-7) denied the allegation, S1-S7 denied not safeguarding resthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230831163759
Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident with bathing.

On 08/28/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA Richard met with Executive Director LiLit Mnatsakanyan. LPA Richard explained the purpose of today's visit. Later LPA was joined with wellness Director Diane Parras. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Richard toured the physical plant with Well-Ness Director Parras. LPA toured Resident bedrooms R#1010, R#431, R#514, R#706, R#731, R#1209, and R#1225 and spoke to residents regarding the allegation. LPA Richard obtained copies of Staff and Resident rosters, Resident R1- R7 records (Needs and Service Plan, Pre- Placement Appraisal, Physician Report, Admission Aggreement and Shower Schedules). LPA interviewed residents (R1-R7) about the staff not assiting them with bathing. All residents interviewed, stated they have no issues regrding bathing. Residents (R1-R7) stated they are the ones refusing to take a shower sometimes. LPA interviewed Staff (S1-S6) about the allegthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230821103551
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations9typical 1
Substantiated complaints11typical 2
Total complaints16typical 7
State visits on file32typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020258912024781202377120222222021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (310) 208-4590

Is Watermark At Westwood Village, The licensed?

Yes — Watermark At Westwood Village, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Angeles (Los Angeles County): California license #198320127, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 237 residents. State records list 28 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 17, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Watermark At Westwood Village, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Watermark At Westwood Village, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 237 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 25 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. 3RD FLOOR AND BELOW APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. 3RD FLOOR ONLY APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25. NEW MGMT CO. ATSC II LLC EFFECTIVE 01/01/2025.

How much does Watermark At Westwood Village, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Watermark At Westwood Village, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Watermark At Westwood Village, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Watermark At Westwood Village, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

135 of 237 beds occupied (57%) when the state visited on August 27, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Watermark At Westwood Village, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 28 dated documents since 2021 for Watermark At Westwood Village, The; 15 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 27, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

15 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not take proper steps to mitigate the spread of a communicable disease.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 8/27/2025 at approximately 11:45 AM, LPA Alfonso Iniguez conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met Tommy Farid Taheri/Assistant Executive Director. LPA Iniguez explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: LPA conducted the following interviews: Executive Director’s Interview (A#1), Residents Interviews (R#1-R#9) and Staff Interview (S#1-S#10). LPA obtained and reviewed the following documents: Resident Roster dated: 8/27/25, Staff Roster dated: 8/27/25, copy of facility’s Infection Control Plan dated: 7/15/25, Copies of Unusual Incident Report or LIC 624 dated: 8/15/25, 8/17/25, 8/19/25, 8/20/25 and 8/21/25, copy of email sent to the County Department of Public Health dated: 8/20/25. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 27, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250820132156
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure residents’ personal belongings are safely secured. Staff does not ensure facility is in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On August 03, 2025, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Sahar Masarati, the Executive Director of Enrichment, greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegations mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with Resident #1 through Resident #10 (R1-R10), Staff #1 through Staff #7 (S1-S7), and Witness #1 (W1). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 09/01/23 and 07/09/25), the Resident Roster (dated 01/22/25), Register of Facility Residents LIC 9020 (dated 06/13/25), and Resident #1 (R1)'s service records, as well as other pertinent records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 3, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250116144249
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable death. Facility staff did not meet resident's oxygen needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This report supersedes the previous reports LIC9099 and LIC9099-C, created on May 15, 2025. The findings regarding the complaint remain unchanged. On June 05, 2025, LPA Richard conducted a subsequent visit and met with Senior Executive Director Stephanie Koffman and explained the purpose of this visit. On 5/15/25, at approximately 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman-Senior Executive Director and explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation consisted of the following: The department obtained and reviewed copies of the staff and resident rosters, Resident (R1)’s physician’s report, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record, and Admission Agreement. The department obtained and reviewed the concluded summary of the Los Angeles Fire Department report #1077, the 911 recording from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, and the Los Angeles Police Department report fCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 11-AS-20240209102246
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not comply with facility theft and loss program requirements. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 5/15/24, at approximately 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst-PA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman-Senior Executive Director and explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: LPA conducted the following interviews: Senior Executive Director Interview (A#1), Residents 1 Interview (R#1) and Witness 1 interview (W#1). LPA obtained and reviewed the following documents: Resident Roster dated:5/6/25, Staff Roster dated:3/22/25, Copy of the Health and Safety Code 1569.153 regulation, copy of Los Angeles Police Department Victim’s Supplemental Property Loss Report filled by (R#1) and dated on:8/26/24, Copy Excel spreadsheet of facility Initial Employee Trainings dated:9/20/2024, copy of 2024 facility staff trainings, copy of (R#1)’s of 1st Admissions Agreement dated:6/30/23, copy of (R#1)’s 2nd Admissions Agreement dated: 7/24/24, copy of (R#1)’s Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables or LICCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2025 · control 11-AS-20240910162855
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable death. Facility staff did not meet resident's oxygen needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5/15/24, at approximately 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst-PA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman-Senior Executive Director and explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation consisted of the following: The department obtained and reviewed copies of the staff and resident rosters, Resident (R1)’s physician’s report, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record, and Admission Agreement. The department obtained and reviewed the concluded summary of the Los Angeles Fire Department report #1077, the 911 recording from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, and the Los Angeles Police Department report for the January 31, 2024, incident involving R1. The department obtained and reviewed the Los Angeles County coroner's report and death certificate for R1. The department conducted interviews with residents (R2-R3), staff (S1-S4), and Administrator/Litit Mnatsakanyan (A1), and R1’s private caregiver (W1). ECDSS inspection report, May 15, 2025 · control 11-AS-20240209102246

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff transported clients while under the influence of marijuana.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/30/2024 LPA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met with Stephanie Koffman / Senior Executive Director. LPA Iniguez explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: LPA conducted the following interviews: Administrator Interview(A#1), Staff Interviews (S#1-S#6) and Resident’s interviews (R#1-R#5). LPA obtained and reviewed the following documents: Resident’s roster, Personnel roster, copies of November and December resident outing sign up list. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2024 · control 11-AS-20241227134058
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents pendents are disabled due to transition between new management company.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 09/18/24 Licensing program analyst (LPA) Lizeth Villegas conducted a subsequent visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Stephanie Koffman as the purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 04/25/24 (LPA) Wendy Gibbs conducted initial visit and conducted the following: a tour the facility, pendant test for bedrooms #502 and #608, interviews with staff (S1-S10), and interviews with residents (R1-R4). On 04/25/24 LPA Wendy Gibbs obtained the following documents: staff Roster, resident Roster, email to staff regarding room checks, room check log, death report, needs and service plan, admission evaluation, and physicians report. On 09/18/24 LPA Lizeth Villegas obtained a copy of the staff and resident rosters and conducted a tour, interviews with executive director (ED), and residents #5-10 (R5-R10). The investigation revealed the following: SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 18, 2024 · control 11-AS-20240419164424
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following Emergency Disaster Plan protocols.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 01/17/2024 9:20 AM, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Ulysses Coronel and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Regina Cloyd conducted a complaint investigation at the above facility to investigate the following allegations. LPM and LPA met with Business Office Manager Mariam Gezalian and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Lilit Mnatsakanyan joined the inspection later. The investigation consisted of the following: During today’s investigation LPM, LPA, and staff conducted a tour of the facility which included the 14th floor, 3rd floor (Memory Care), 2nd Floor, and stairwells. LPM and LPA interviewed the Administrator and seven (7) staff members and interviewed 10 out of 101 residents. LPM and LPA reviewed the register of residents, Fire Safety Inc’s Fire Drill Reports conducted on 09/23/23, 10/30/23, 12/08/23, and 12/19/23, Personnel Report (LIC 500), and emergency disaster plan. Continue to LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 17, 2024 · control 11-AS-20240110121519

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not follow Covid-19 protocols. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
**This report serves as an amendment to clarify findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created 01/12/2023.** On 10/06/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David España conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegations. LPA met with Lilit E. Mnatsakanyan, Administrator and explained the purpose of this visit was to deliver findings for this complaint. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/05/2022 between 9:30am to 2:48pm, LPA conducted an initial 10-day visit and met with Resident Care Service Director, Kimberly Davis. LPA conducted a tour of the facility. On 12/05/2022 and 01/11/2023 between the hours of 10:12am - 3:00pm LPA completed interviews, requested, and reviewed copies of records. Documents were received at the time of visit. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 6, 2023 · control 11-AS-20221201130811
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not safeguarding resident's personal property. Resident is being financially abused while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 09/05/2023, at 11:40 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David España met with Administrator, Lilit Mnatsakanyan, to conduct a complaint investigation to address the allegations listed above. LPA España met with Administrator, Lilit Mnatsakanyan and explained the purpose of this visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA España conducted a tour of the facility grounds. LPA España interviewed staff, clients, witnesses, and reviewed records. LPA España requested and reviewed the following documents, client roster, staff roster, and The Watermark at Westwood Village Residential Living Residency Agreement. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not safeguarding resident's personal property.” 4 out of 5 residents interviewed disagreed with the allegation and denied having any issues with facility staff not safeguarding resident's personal property. 7 out of 7 staff (S1-7) denied the allegation, S1-S7 denied not safeguarding resCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230831163759
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist resident with bathing.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/28/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA Richard met with Executive Director LiLit Mnatsakanyan. LPA Richard explained the purpose of today's visit. Later LPA was joined with wellness Director Diane Parras. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Richard toured the physical plant with Well-Ness Director Parras. LPA toured Resident bedrooms R#1010, R#431, R#514, R#706, R#731, R#1209, and R#1225 and spoke to residents regarding the allegation. LPA Richard obtained copies of Staff and Resident rosters, Resident R1- R7 records (Needs and Service Plan, Pre- Placement Appraisal, Physician Report, Admission Aggreement and Shower Schedules). LPA interviewed residents (R1-R7) about the staff not assiting them with bathing. All residents interviewed, stated they have no issues regrding bathing. Residents (R1-R7) stated they are the ones refusing to take a shower sometimes. LPA interviewed Staff (S1-S6) about the allegCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230821103551
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not safeguard resident's personal property
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/18/23 at 10:50 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. Upon arrival LPA met with Shakeb Rafat (Administrator) and explained the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit LPA and administrator toured the facility and reviewed the camera footage outside of Resident#1’s apartment. LPA confirmed it is in working condition. LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, and took pictures of Resident#1’s lock. LPA also interviewed: administrator and a total of two (2) staff who shall be referred to as S1 and S2. LPA interviewed a total of 7 residents who shall be referred to as: R1 through R7. LPA conducted file review for 1 resident. Report continued con 9099c UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230109130215

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
9
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
11
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
16
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
32
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(310) 208-4590
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Watermark At Westwood Village, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.