Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Comfort Home for ElderlyLicense #197607430 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareComfort Home for ElderlyLicense #197607430 · 2729 Westwood Blvd., Westwood, CA · (310) 470-7302Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Comfort Home for Elderly
Map · 2729 Westwood Blvd.

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,700/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (310) 470-7302

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

CH

Call Comfort Home for Elderly

Westwood · Licensed for 6

(310) 470-7302

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Westwood

Comfort Home for Elderly

2729 Westwood Blvd., Westwood, CA 90064 · Licensed since 2008

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Comfort Home for Elderly

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,700 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 5 residents
  • Hospiceup to 4 residents
  • Bedridden

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
5 NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (4) FOUR.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Comfort Home for Elderly: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,700a month to start

Likely $4,650–$7,000

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,700likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,700likely $4,650–$7,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,650–$7,150
$5,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,450–$10,300
$8,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $9,000

$2,500$9,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

9 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,400–$9,000.

  • Miko InnLos Angeles · 0.3 mi · Small home
    $8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Bentley ManorLos Angeles · 1.3 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ayres Residential Care Home-Century CityLos Angeles · 1.3 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Coastal HouseLos Angeles · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $9,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ladera VistaLos Angeles · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ladera Sunrise Care HomeLos Angeles · 4.7 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Palisades VillaPacific Palisades · 6.9 mi · Small home
    $6,400Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Harvard Hope HouseLos Angeles · 7.0 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • The LighthouseToluca Lake · 9.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

2729 Westwood Blvd., Westwood, CA 90064Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Southern California Hospital at Culver CityHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.7 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197607430 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 7 of 13 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 4 “Unsubstantiated”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

Sep 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 09/25/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Regina Cloyd conducted an unannounced required – 1 Year Annual inspection and met with Administrator Socorro Trinidad. The facility is licensed to serve six non-ambulatory residents (age range 60 and over), of which one may be bedridden. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for four residents. The facility currently has one bedridden resident and one resident receiving hospice care and two residents receiving home health services. Annual fees are current. The facility has five resident bedrooms, two bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, laundry area, front and rear porch, and a ramp on both sides of the house. There is a detached additional dwelling unit. Administrator accompanied LPA inside and outside the facility during this inspection. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards, doorways were free of obstructions. Continue to LIC809-C. Residents’ beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the residents’ personal belongings was observed. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. Common bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of non-perishable food. Knives were kept locked in cupboard. First Aid kit was available. Fire extinguishers, last serviced 09/16/2026, are in the dining room and kitchen. Administrator tested the carbon monoxide detector and smoke detectors in the house. Both devices were functional. Five staff records were reviewed, five out of five staff records had current first aid certificates and required criminal record clearances or criminal record exemptions. Five resident records and two medications were reviewed. No deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was conducted, technical assistance provided and a copy of this report was discussed and left with Administrator Socorro Trinidad.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2026

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Aug 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the fire alarms were working property.

On 08/07/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit to facility and deliver findings. LPA was granted access and allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. LPA Richard was met by staff Nelly Salvador, and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. Later was joined by the Administrator Socorro Trinidad. Investigation consisted of the following: On 08/07/2025, LPA requested and obtained the staff roster, resident roster, and duty logs of Staff to determine which staff members were at the facility during the time the fire alarms didn’t set off, and the Facility Plan of Operation. LPA interviewed the Administrator #1 (A1) and Staff #1 (S1). LPA toured the facility. Report Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not ensure the fire alarms were working properly. The complaint alleges that the fire alarms were unplugged; if there had been a fire, the fire alarms would not have sounded. On August 7, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., LPA Richard interviewed Administrator #1 (A1), who stated that on June 25, 2025, one of the residents passed away at the facility. The staff were busy dealing with the resident's passing, and one of the caregivers left a bagel in the microwave that burnt, causing the whole kitchen and living room to smell burnt. There was no fire or smoke to trigger the alarms. On August 7, 2025, LPA interviewed staff member #1 (S1), who reported that there was no smoke, only the smell of a burning bagel. At 10:00 AM on the same day, LPA Richard toured the facility and noted that there were eight smoke detectors, and that the fire alarm system was combined into one system and in operable condition. At 10:30 AM, LPA tested all eight smoke and fire alarms, finding that they all functioned properly. LPA also observed that the fire alarms are electric and not plugged in, with the exception of the carbon monoxide alarm. Based on observation and interviews conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation: Staff did not ensure the fire alarms were working properly. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited on today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Socorro Trinidad.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250730132939
Jul 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/21/2025 at 11:45 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to conduct the annual inspection. Upon arrival to the facility, LPA Allen met with Jusus Rodriguez support staff who was informed of the purpose of the visit and allowed LPA into the facility. Jesus called Socorro Trinidad Administrator and informed her of the purpose of today’s visit who arrived about 12:05 PM. The facility is licensed to serve (6) residents ages 60 and above, of which (5) may be non-ambulatory and (1) bedridden. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for (4) residents. The facility is in a residential neighborhood that consists of 5 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and the washer & dryer are in hallway . At 12:15 AM, LPA Allen, toured the physical plant with Socorro Trinidad- Administrator. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. There is a shaded area for the residents, visitors, and staff. LPA Allen observed the 5 bedrooms to have the required furniture, bedding, adequate lighting, and storage for the president’s personal belongings was observed. The bathrooms were observed to be clean, sanitary with wash basins and toilets to be in operable condition. LPA observed the fire extinguishers fully charge and smoke and carbon monoxide combo are in operable conditions. The water temperature properly measured between 105°-120°F. LPA observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of the visit. The kitchen was inspected, and LPA observed a 5-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable food available and maintained properly. At 1:15 PM, LPA Allen reviewed four (4) residents files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans which were up to date. LPA Allen also observed the residents Medication Administration Records (MARS) which appears that the residents are given their medications as prescribed by their physicians. LPA Allen reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings which were all current. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Socorro Trinidad Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2025

20244 state visits · 4 documents

Oct 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: .Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed 2.Staff did not inform the resident's authorized representatives of the resident's change in health condition

On 10/25/2024 the Department conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. The Department was met by Socorro Trinidad, Administrator and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The Department was granted access and allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. Investigation consisted of the following: CONTINUE TO LIC9099C Unsubstantiated On 07/18/2024 the Department interviewed Staff #1- Staff# 3 (S1-S3), and reviewed records of resident #1- resident #3 (R1-R3). On 07/18/2024 the Department interviewed witness #1 (W1). The Department requested to the following documents: the Medication Administration Records (MARs), physician's orders of prescriptions, progress notes, health assessments, and any documentation of changes in health condition and incident reports related to Resident #1- Resident #3 (R1-R3). The department requested any communication logs or records, facility's policies and procedures related to medication administration, and training records for S1-S3. Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed It is alleged that on 7/8/2024 R1 did not receive their PRN medication. On 07/18/2024 the department interviewed Socorro Trinidad, facility administrator. The department asked if staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. The Administrator stated there were no concerns or issues with staff administering resident's medication as prescribed. On 07/18/2024 the department interviewed staff #1- staff #3 (S1-S3) who were asked if staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Of those interviewed S1-S3 stated there were no concerns about staff administering resident's medication as prescribed. On 07/18/2024 the department interviewed witness #1 (W1), who was asked if staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Witness #1 (W1) stated there were no concerns about staff administering resident's medication as prescribed. On 07/18/2024 and 10/22/2024 the department conducted reviews of facility records. Per physicians’ orders from Roze Hospice, R1 was prescribed Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) to be administered orally at a dose of 5 MG every 4 hours as needed for severe pain or shortness of breath. On 07/18/2024 and 10/22/2024 the department reviewed facility notes, which state a discontinuation of previous medication orders for morphine to be started on 7/7/2024, orders given o the facility at 12:45pm and an accompanying prescription issued on 7/8/2024 written at 12:49PM. CONTINUE REPORT TO LIC9099C Based on interviews and observations there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation: Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not inform the resident's authorized representatives of the resident's change in health condition On 07/18/2024 the department interviewed Socorro Trinidad, Administrator who was asked if staff did not inform the resident's authorized representatives of the resident's change in health condition. The Administrator stated there were no concerns or issues with staff not informing the resident's authorized representatives of the resident's change in health condition. On 07/18/2024 the department interviewed staff #1- staff #3 (S1-S3) who was asked if staff did not inform the resident's authorized representatives of the resident's change in health condition. Of those interviewed S1-S3 stated there were no concerns about staff did not informing the resident's authorized representatives of the resident's change in health condition. On 07/18/2024 the Department interviewed witness #1 (W1) who verified W1 is to be contacted for resident. W1 reported the facility staff provided updates and condition changes of resident’s condition to the authorized representative. On 10/22/2024 the department reviewed facility records and confirmed authorized representative for residents. Based on interviews and observations there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation: Staff did not inform the resident's authorized representatives of the resident's change in health condition. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. There were deficiencies cited on today's visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was given to Socorro Trinidad, Administrator. .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2024 · control 11-AS-20240708130938
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 08/08/2024 at 1:00 pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), David España conducted an unannounced annual visit using the full CAREs tool. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA España conducted a risk assessment at the front door. Based on the assessment, the facility is clear of Covid-19 infection. LPA verified that the facility has an approved mitigation plan report. LPA was granted access and allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. LPA was met by Socorro Trinidad Administrator and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The facility is licensed to serve (6) residents ages 60 and above of which (5) may be non-ambulatory and (1) bedridden. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for (4) residents. The facility is located in a residential neighborhood it consists of 5 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and washer and dryer in hallway closet and patios with shaded areas. LPA toured the physical plant with administrator. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. A total of (5) rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were operational. LIC809-C (cont). LPA inspected rooms: #1, #2, #3 #4 and #5 and smoke and carbon monoxide combo are all operable conditions. The water temperature properly measured between 105°-120°F. LPA observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of the visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available maintained properly. All fire extinguishers were charged and were operable. A review of (5) residents' service files, (2) staff personnel files and (2) Medication Administration Records (MAR) were checked. First AID kit was checked. LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. Licensee will email copy of liability insurance to LPA. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Socorro Trinidad Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024
Jul 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Uncleared staff working in facility. Unqualified staff providing care to residents.

On 07/25/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced complaint visit. Upon arrival at the facility LPA called the facility. LPA was granted access and allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. Later on, LPA was joined by the administrator Socorro Trinidad. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed staff #1-#3 (S1-S3) and residents #1-#2 (R1-R2). LPA asked questions relevant to the nature of the complaint. A toured the facility inside to observe and identify any signs of neglect, abuse, or other immediate health and safety threats. LPA requested, reviewed, and collected Personnel Records for four Staff (4) members (S1-S4). Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099 Unsubstantiated Allegation: Uncleared staff working in the facility. The details of the complaint reported that staff employed at this facility do not have background clearance and are not cleared to work. The complainant stated there are undocumented staff that are working at the facility without US Citizenship. LPA Richard reviewed and audited personnel records for the staff #1-#4 (S1-S4), revealing that 4 out of 4 staff members have a Community Care Licensing (CCL) Criminal Background Clearance on file at the facility. On 07/23/2024, LPA ran a Facility Personnel Report Summary LIS-536 or California Department of Social Services (CDSS). The report showed all the staff were cleared. LPA interviewed the licensee (S1). Licensee stated that all the staff she hired were from referral; however, she ensured all the staff criminal backgrounds were done entirely before hiring them. Based on the information gathered, the allegation listed above is not supported. Based on record reviews and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that uncleared staff working at the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there’s not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Continued LIC9099-C page 2 Allegation: Unqualified staff providing care to the residents. The details of the complaint stated that unqualified staff are providing care to the residents. The complainant reported that the staff doesn't know CPR. Interviews conducted with three staff (S1-S3) members revealed that 3 out of 3 staff members have completed all the required medical training to help take care of the residents. The records reviewed on 07/25/2024 showed that the staff had a copy of the CPR/AED First Aid Certificate and forty hours of training on file. LPA verified training certificates and training logs were up to date. Interviews with two residents #1-#2 (R1-R2) 2 out of 2 stated that they do not have any concerns of the care or supervision the staff provided to them. Due to their health condition, (R3-R4) were not interviewed. Based on the gathered information, the allegation mentioned above is not supported. Based on interviewed and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that unqualified staff providing care to residents. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview conducted with Socorro Trinidad and copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2024 · control 11-AS-20240718153153
Feb 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries while in care Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care Staff did not follow a resident's dietary restrictions Facility admitted a resident that needed a higher level of care

This report serves as an amendment to clarify findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created 2/2/24. On 2/2/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felisa Shirley conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility. LPA was met by Iris L. Cortes, Caregiver, and explained the purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the allegations mentioned above. LPA was granted access to the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/3/2023 LPA Felisa Shirley and LPM Stephanie Cifuentes requested and received copies of the following records: Staff Roster, Resident Rosters for the past 2 years, admissions agreements, identification and emergency information, physician’s report, medications, death report, and hospice records for Resident 1 and Resident 2(R1-R2). Follow-up interviews were conducted by LPA Shirley with Staff 3-Staff 4(S3-S4), witness 3(W3) and witness 6 (W6) A separate investigation was conducted Con'd on 9099-C Unsubstantiated by Department of Social Services Investigations Bureau Investigator Laura Garcia consisting of a request from home health and hospice records, records of hospitalizations, and interviews with staff 1-Staff 2(S1-S2) resident 3 (R3), Witness 1, Witness 2, Witness 4, and Witness 5 (W1, W2, W4 and W5). On 2/2/2024 LPA Shirley conducted a health and safety check and toured the facility with caregiver Nelly Salvador. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries while in care It is alleged that resident had multiple pressure injuries. Investigation Branch's Department Investigator Laura Garcia conducted interviews with staff from this facility, facility residents, staff from Wound Masters wound care and reviewed medical records/reports. A review of records shows R1 resided at her own home and received hospice and home health care from Doring Care Management Services until her admittance to Comfort Home for the Elderly on 2/21/22. Investigator Laura Garcia interviewed staff from Doring Care Management (W1), who stated R1 sustained pressure injuries while under their care due to fragile skin and immobility. While at Comfort Home for Elderly, R1 received hospice services from Summer Breeze Hospice and Palliative Care and Wound Masters wound care. On 2/24/22 R1 was assessed by Wound Masters wound care services. Records from the wound care service indicate that resident had three pressure injuries upon admittance to the facility: Stage 2 to right heel, Stage 2 to left heel, Stage 4 to Sacro coccyx. Investigator Laura Garcia interviewed RN from Wound Masters, Witness 2 (W2) who stated that wounds were developed prior to R1’s move to Comfort Home for Elderly. A further review of progress notes dated from 2/24/22 to 6/14/22 from Wound Masters wound care show that by 3/17/22 pressure injury to R1’s right heel had healed. On 4/21/22 a stage 3 pressure injury was found on R1’s elbow. By 5/12/22 Stage 3 pressure injury to R1’s elbow had closed. Further review of notes by the wound care agency gives no indication of neglect by the facility. LPA Shirley spoke to staff from Wound Masters on 2/1/24, Witness 3 (W3) stated that Wound Masters staff had no concerns of neglect from facility staff. The Investigation Branch Departments Investigator Laura Garcia and LPA Shirley found there is no evidence to corroborate the allegation mentioned above. The information and evidence obtained did not sufficiently support the allegation. Con'd 9099-C Based on information gathered, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation “Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustain multiple pressure injuries while in care” therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care It is alleged that resident had a fractured hand. Investigation Branch's Department Investigator Laura Garcia conducted interviews and gathered records from staff from this facility, facility residents, home health/hospice agencies and hospitals. A review of medical reports received from UCLA Health-Medical Records show that on 1/7/22 R1 was admitted to UCLA Health for a closed fracture of the right hand. R1 was admitted to Comfort Home for Elderly on 2/21/22. A further review of records reviewed from Wound Masters wound care show no fractures sustained while R1 was under the care of Comfort Home for Elderly. Investigator Laura Garcia interviewed S1, S2, W1 and W2 regarding fractures, and all four stated the fracture did not occur while R1 resided at Comfort Home for Elderly. W1 of Doring Care Management further stated the fracture occurred under their care while R1 resided in her own home. The Investigation Branch Departments Investigator Laura Garcia found there is no evidence to corroborate the allegation mentioned above. The information and evidence obtained did not sufficiently support the allegation. Based on information gathered, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation “Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care,” therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not follow a resident’s dietary restrictions It is alleged that resident was receiving foods that were not part of her dietary plan. LPA Shirley reviewed facility records and found that the Physician’s Report dated 3/29/2022 shows that per doctor, the resident was currently on a pureed diet with thickened liquids. LPA Shirley interviewed S1, S2 and S3 and asked staff if they ever deviated from resident’s special diet. Of those interviewed, 2 out of 3 stated staff did not deviate from resident’s dietary restrictions. S3 stated that she did not work at this faciity while R1 was there, but did state that they do not deviate from special diets. Based on records review and interviews, there is not sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Con'd 9099-c Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of “Staff not following a resident’s dietary restrictions,” is found to be unsubstantiated. Allegation: Facility admitted resident that needed a higher level of care It is alleged that resident was not a good fit for facility and needed a higher level of care due to needing full assistance with multiple diagnoses. LPA Shirley reviewed the facility file and found that the facility has a current and valid fire clearance for bedridden residents. A review of medical reports received from UCLA Health-Medical Records show that on 1/7/22 R1 was admitted to UCLA Health for a closed fracture of right hand, while R1 lived on her own and not under the care of the facility. LPA Felisa Shirley reviewed home health and wound care records records and found that R1 resided at her own home and received hospice and home health care from Doring Care Management Services until her admittance to Comfort Home for the Elderly on 2/21/22. Investigator Laura Garcia interviewed staff from Doring Care Management (W1), who stated R1 sustained pressure injuries while under their care due to fragile skin and immobility. When R1 entered facility on 2/21/2022, she did so with services from Summer Breeze Hospice and Palliative Care and Wound Masters wound care. A further review of files shows that the facility had a plan of care in place for resident’s care. A further review of hospice records shows that an oxygen concentrator was part of the inventory for R1, not a ventilator. With the care plan in place, the facility staff in conjunction with the various care agencies providing direct services and care to the resident, the facility did not admit or retain the resident beyond their ability to provide care. Based on records review and interviews, there is not sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of “Facility admitted resident that needed a higher level of care,” is found to be unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the LIC 9099 report was provided to Socorro Trinidad.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2024 · control 11-AS-20231002112925
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 6 documents

20233 state visits · 3 documents

Jul 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 7/20/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced annual required using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Socorro Trinidad /Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve (6) residents ages 60 and above of which (5) may be non-ambulatory and (1) bedridden. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for (4) patients. The facility is located in a residential neighborhood it consists of 5 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and washer and dryer in hallway closet and patios with shaded areas. LPA Iniguez toured the physical plant with administrator. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. A total of (3) rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were operational. LPA inspected rooms: #1, #2, and #3 and smoke and carbon monoxide combo are all operable conditions. The water temperature properly measured between 105°-120°F: Kitchen 106.9°F, Bathroom #1:105.7°F, Bathroom #2:107.8°F. Evaluation Report Continues LIC 809-C LPA Iniguez observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of the visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available maintained properly. All fire extinguishers were charged and were operable. A review of (3) residents' service files, (3) staff personnel files and (3) Medication Administration Records (MAR) were checked. First AID kit was checked. LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. Licensee will email copy of liability insurance to LPA together with missing documents. Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Socorro Trinidad /Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 20, 2023
Apr 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries due to staff neglect.. Staff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff are not meeting residents diapering needs.

On 03/22/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA verified the person of COVID-19 activity. Based on the assessment, the facility is cleared of COVID-19 infection. LPA met with Administrator Socorro Trinidad. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed staff #1-#3 (S1-S3), residents #1-#4 (R1-R4), and witnesses #1-#4 (W1-W4). LPA asked questions relevant to the nature of the complaint. A toured the facility inside to observe and identify any signs of neglect, abuse, or other immediate health and safety threats. Personnel Records for (S1-S5)) were provided and reviewed and other documents associated with this complaint. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegation: Resident sustained injuries due to staff neglect. Staff handled resident in a rough manner. It is alleged that staff neglected to care for residents at this facility which resulted in injuries. The complainant named a resident at this facility who yelled for staff assistance during a shower and was handled roughly. The resident was handled mishandled and suffered scrapes on the back, hips, and legs. The complainant did not have the name of the staff and the resident that was named for this complaint did not exists. Currently, there are five elderly residents residing at this facility. Residents #1-#2 (R1-R2) had no issues with the facility regarding their care or supervision. Due to their health condition, (R3-R4) were interviewed, however unable to provide any information on this matter. Interviews conducted with staff #1-#3 (S1-S3) all confirmed that there are no residents with any injuries. (S1-S3) confirmed that all the residents require assistance with daily living activities and that staff are trained professionals to handle each duty. (S1-S3) routine body checks are performed daily with all residents in care. Interviews conducted with family representatives witness #1-#4 (W1-W4) agreed with the care and services provided at this facility and were complimentary. (W2) claimed since (R2) has been a resident at this facility (R2’s) health condition has only improved and not declined. Allegation: Staff are not meeting residents diapering needs. The details of the complaint reported resident #3 (R3) is not adequately clean during diaper changes. The complainant did not have further details on this matter. (S1-S3) reported diaper changes are done after each meal or as needed. (S1) claims there are no residents including (R3) with any diaper rash or injuries that would result from residents being neglected in care. Interviews with witnesses #1-#4 (W1-W4) did not have concerns or issues with the resident’s care. (W1-W4) reported an in-person visit conducted weekly have not observed residents neglected with services. (W1-W4) expressed the facility never had a malodor smell that would result from toileting issues. (W3) stated the facility on every visit have observed to be clean and sanitary. Residents #1-#2 (R1-R2) had no concerns with the facility regarding diaper issues. Due to their health condition, (R3-R4) were interviewed, however unable to provide any information on this matter. The Department inspected visits on 03/22/23 and 04/14/23 did not observe signs of residents neglected in care. Evaluation Report continues on LIC-9099-C Based on observation, record analysis, and interviews, there is no evidence to support the allegations to support the allegations mentioned above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview conducted with Socorro Trinidad and copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230316084904
Mar 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not providing adequate food service to residents. Staff is falsifying staff documents. Unqualified staff providing care to residents.

On 03/22/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted an unannounced complaint visit. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA verified the person of COVID-19 activity. Based on the assessment, the facility is cleared of COVID-19 infection. LPA met with Administrator Socorro Trinidad. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed staff #1-#3 (S1-S3) and residents #1-#4 (R1-R4). LPA asked questions relevant to the nature of the complaint. A toured the facility inside to observe and identify any signs of neglect, abuse, or other immediate health and safety threats. Personnel Records for (S1-S5)) were provided and reviewed. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegation: Staff is not providing adequate food service to residents. The details of the complaint reported the staff does not provide adequate food to residents in care. The complainant reported this facility does not have enough food for residents. The Department conducted an inspection visit on 03/22/23 and observed the facility is following Title 22 Section 87555 General Food Services Requirements. The Department observed food supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days. The food supply included milk products, meat, vegetables, fruits, bread, cereals, juices, and sweets. A weekly menu was posted and made available for review for residents. Moreover, the facility had an additional food supply stored as a backup freezer inside the facility. Interviews with residents #1-#2 (R1-R2) both confirmed the facility serves three meals daily with snacks and had no issues with the facility not having variety or enough food supply. Due to their health condition, (R3-R4) were interviewed, however unable to provide any information on this matter. According to (S1) groceries are restocked on daily basis. Based on the gathered information, the allegation mentioned above cannot be supported. Allegation: Staff is falsifying staff documents. The details of the complaint stated the facility is providing false documentation for staff. The complainant unable to provide further information on this allegation. The Department conducted a review/audited of personnel records, and it revealed the facility had all the required documents for each employee and verified for validity and accuracy. Each staff had the following: Application for Employment, California ID, Heath Screening Report LIC 503, Criminal Record Statement LIC 508, Fingerprint Clearance, Requirement to Report Suspected Abuse SOC 341A, Employee Rights LIC 9052, First Aid Certificate, TB, and Medical Training Verification. Based on the gathered information, the allegation mentioned above cannot be supported. Evaluation Report continues on LIC 9099-C Allegation: Unqualified staff providing care to residents. The details of the complaint stated that unqualified staff is providing care to residents. The complainant reported that the staff is not fully trained. Interviews conducted with (S1-S3) all verified they have completed all the required medical training. Evidence of training certificates and logs were review/audited. Interviews with residents #1-#2 (R1-2) stated no concerns for the care or supervision. Due to their health condition, (R3-R4) were interviewed, however unable to provide any information on this matter. Based on the gathered information, the allegation mentioned above cannot be supported. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview conducted with Socorro Trinidada and copy of the report provided. INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegation: Facility staff did not have a criminal record clearance. The details of the complaint reported that staff employed at this facility do not have background clearance and are not cleared to work. The complainant stated there are undocumented staff are working at this facility. The Department reviewed/audited personnel staff #1-#5 (S1-S5) and it revealed that (S5) does not have a Community Care Licensing (CCL) Criminal Background Clearance Transfer Request LIC-9182 on file and is not associated with this facility. (S5) has been employed at this facility since 10/15/21 and is not included in (CCL) Facility Personnel Report Summary LIS-536 or California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Guardia Background Check System. Based on the information gathered, the allegation listed above is supported. Based on record reviews and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 are cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview conducted with Socorro Trinidada and copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2023 · control 11-AS-20230316084904

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(c)(1)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 23, 2023

87355(c)(1) (c) A licensee or applicant for a license may request a transfer of a criminal record clearance from one state licensed facility to another...to a state licensed facility by providing the following documents to the Department: (1) A signed Criminal Background Clearance Transfer Request, LIC 9182. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on (interview) (record review), the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Staff #5 (S5) did not have criminal record clearance. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee to ensure that all staff prior to working in the facility obtain a Criminal Background Clearance and Criminal Background Transfer Request and provide proof of correction to CCLD by POC due date: 03/23/23. Copies received during the time of visit. ***A CIVIL PENALTY IS BEING ISSUED TODAY***

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20223 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 9/26/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonia Alvizar conducted an unannounced annual required visit with a primary focus on Infection Control measures using the new CARE Inspection Tool visit to Comfort Home For Elderly. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the annual inspection Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Caregivers, Nelly Santiago Salvador and Iris Lorena Cortez. LPA was granted access and allowed to enter facility to conduct an annual inspection. Licensee, Socorro Trinidad joined the visit shortly after. The facility is licensed for 5 non-ambulatory and 1 bedridden. Facility has a hospice waiver for (3) three. The facility currently has 2 ambulatory residents and 3 non-ambulatory residents. 2 ambulatory resident residents are diagnosed with mild Dementia one receives home health and other receives hospice services. The facility does not handle any of the residents’ finances. During today’s visit LPA toured the single- story physical plant with caregiver, Iris Lorena Cortez, checked food service, reviewed staff records and reviewed resident files for medical status. Reviewed staff records, S#1 is only finger printed but not associated to facility. The facility conducted a fire drill January 2022. The home consists of 5 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and washer and dryer in hallway closet. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place. The water temperature did not measure between the Department’s Regulatory temperature of 105 and 120 degrees F. At 11:54am LPA Alvziar observed the water temperature in bathroom for resident #1 at 129.5 degrees F. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean; doorways were free of obstructions. Kitchen was checked and LPA Alvizar observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food. All other hazardous items, and medications were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors were working properly, and fire extinguisher was fully charged. Carbon monoxide detector was operational. First Aid kit was available with a pair of scissor, tweezer and thermometer. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the appeal rights were given Administrator, Socorro Trinidad at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2022

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jul 6, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a death while in care Uncleared adult is providing care and supervision

On 07/06/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Agard conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegations. LPA Agard was met with Administrator, Socorro Trindad and explained the purpose of the visit was to gather information regarding this complaint. The investigation consisted of the following: on 04/14/2022 LPA conducted an initial 24-hour visit inspection, toured the facility, and conducted interviews. LPA requested the following records: Staff and resident roster, death reports from the past 6 months. Due to the need to analyze additional documents, this complaint needed further investigation. On 07/06/2022, LPA Agard delivered findings. Continued on 9099C Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Resident sustained a death while in care. It's being alleged that a resident passed away due to being neglected. The investigation revealed the following: S1 states, R1 did not pass away at the facility. R1 was transported to the hospital on 03/14/2019 and never returned. S2 denies knowing R1. LPA was unable to make contact with W1. LPA was unable to interview residents R2-5 due to communication barriers. R1 was unavailable to be interviewed. Regarding the allegation: Uncleared adult is providing care and supervision. Its being alleged that an LVN was not associated to the facility and was providing care and supervision. The investigation revealed the following: S1 states, W1 was not associated because they worked in the capacity of a home health worker. “W1 didn’t work for me, they worked with another company as a home health worker for Enhanced Care Home Health.” S2 denied knowing W1. LPA was unable to make contact with W1. LPA was unable to interview residents R2-5 due to communication barriers. R1 was unavailable to be interviewed. During an interview with complainant, limited information regarding the name and/or date of birth of resident in question was provided. Complainant stated their intentions was to make an inquiry rather than a complaint. Complainant confirmed alleged perpetrator to be a third-party vendor and not an employee of the facility. During an internal roster review on 04/14/2022, W1 was never associated to the facility as a staff. LPA attempted to contact W2 & W3 to confirm placement of death but was unable to make contact. Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2022 · control 11-AS-20220413090236
Apr 14, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following COVID-19 protocols. Medication closet was left unlocked on multiple occasions.

On 04/14/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Agard conducted an initial complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegations. LPA Agard was met with Gladys Villalta, Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit was to gather information regarding this complaint. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA conducted an inspection, toured the facility, and conducted interviews. LPA requested the following records: Staff and resident roster, mitigation plan, any related trainings. On 04/14/2022, LPA Agard delivered findings. Continued on 9099C Substantiated Regarding the allegation: Facility is not following COVID-19 protocols. “During a facility visit, the ombudsman did not have their temperature checked prior to entering the facility or answer screening questions related to COVID-19. Additionally, ombudsman observed that none of the caregivers were wearing a face mask when interacting with the residents.” The investigation revealed the following: S1 confirmed the allegation as true. “Here’s the thing, when the ombudsman came, they were complaining that no one was wearing a mask or checking the temperature, but no one comes to the house, except for the nurse. The staff have all been informed that they must wear their mask at all times moving forward.” S2 generally states they were reminded by S1 that they must wear their mask at all times. LPA was unable to interview residents R2-5 due to communication barriers. Regarding the allegation: Medication closet was left unlocked on multiple occasions. “Ombudsman observed that the medication closet where the medications are kept was open and unlocked as the doorknob had a pair of keys inside.” The investigation revealed the following: S1 confirmed the allegation to be true. “The first time they came I was cleaning the backyard and they asked me where my mask was. I told them; it was so hot. I’ am by myself in the backyard cleaning. I’m more than 15 feet away. That’s also when he saw the cabinet open because I had just got something from there. I was going to return back what I got out of the cabinet and then they came. They showed up.” During a review of facility mitigation plan, it states the facility will do the following: have a visitation plan in place, check temperatures, have signage posted, require face mask. Facility failed to follow covid mitigation protocol by allowing staff to interact with residents without a mask and not screening visitors. Based on the interviews conducted with administrator and their confirmation of both allegations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division (6) and Chapter (8) are being cited on the attached LIC9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver and a hard copy was provided with appeal rights. See LIC 9009-D on the next page.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2022 · control 11-AS-20220215130330

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 21, 2022

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on administrator admitting to themselves and staff not wearing a mask during a visit from the LTCO. which presented a potential health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility will retrain all staff on mitgation plan and submit proof to Analyst by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(b) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 21, 2022

87309 Storage Space Medicines which are centrally stored shall be stored as specified in Section 87465 and separately from other items specified in (a) above. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on administrator admitting to themselves and staff were not ensuring medication was locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Which presented a potential health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility will have all staff reviews regulation and submit proof to Analyst by POC due date.

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 7, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Rns Management Corp., licensed since 2008.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
14
Total complaints
7
Substantiated allegations
3
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
2

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations20
Substantiated allegations30
Total complaints70

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Comfort Home for Elderly

Is Comfort Home for Elderly licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Comfort Home for Elderly licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Comfort Home for Elderly been cited?

1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Comfort Home for Elderly still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Comfort Home for Elderly cost?

$5,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,650–$7,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Comfort Home for Elderly take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Rns Management Corp., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Southern California Hospital at Culver City is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Comfort Home for Elderly keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Comfort Home for Elderly license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “COMFORT HOME FOR ELDERLY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197607430. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Rns Management Corp., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 25, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.8 mi

    The Plaza at Westwood

    Large community · licensed for 136

    Starting rate

    $3,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.3 mi

    Miko Inn

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $8,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.3 mi

    Ayres Residential Care Homes Cheviot Hills

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,150–$7,750

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.5 mi

    Ayres Residential Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.4 mi

    Aging Eternity Retirement Home 2

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,150–$7,750

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Los Angeles · 0.4 mi

    Aging Eternity Retirement Home 1

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,200–$7,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
CH

Call Comfort Home for Elderly

Westwood · Licensed for 6

(310) 470-7302

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Comfort Home for Elderly

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages