Small home · Licensed for 6 · Rancho Palos Verdes
Golden Care Living
2052 Redondela Drive, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275Licensed since 2008
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 1 resident
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY LICENSED FOR ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 YEARS AND OLDER. FIRE CLEARED FOR FIVE NON-AMBULATORY RESIDNTS AND ONE BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR ONE TERMINALLY ILL RESIDENT. 87705 COMPLIANT
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Golden Care Living: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,100a month to start
Likely $4,150–$6,250
From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,100likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,150–$6,250
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,400
- $5,100
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,900–$9,600
- $7,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $7,000
15 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,100–$6,500.
- Avenida VillaRancho Palos Verdes · 0.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- TLC Guest Home IIRancho Palos Verdes · 0.3 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- TarrasaRancho Palos Verdes · 0.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Velez Care HomeRancho Palos Verdes · 0.4 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Palos Verdes Care CottageRancho Palos Verdes · 0.7 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ocean Breeze Care Home IILomita · 0.9 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Home of the AmazingRancho Palos Verdes · 0.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ethel's Guest HomeSan Pedro · 1.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- St Anthony's Care Home IILomita · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Global Elderly Care FacilityLomita · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Americare Assisted Living of WalteriaTorrance · 1.9 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Pepper Tree Assisted Living IILomita · 2.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on its own website · seen October 5, 2026
- Sweet Life Senior CareHarbor City · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Great Place Home CareHarbor City · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dhaniella's Care HomeHarbor City · 3.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
2052 Redondela Drive, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South BayHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197607206 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 15 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On February 4,2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deborah Lee conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Angelique Gradney and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve (6) residents ages 60 and above. Of which (5) may be non-ambulatory and (1) Bedridden. Approved hospice waiver for (1). Currently the facility has (4) residents. Structure: The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of (5) resident bedrooms, (3) full bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, and patio area with shade located in backyard. The facility entrance and exits are wheelchair accessible. The facility has (1) garage that is utilized for supplies. Physical Plant: LPA Lee and the Administrator toured the physical plant. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. The facility is clean, safe and sanitary. Page 1 of 3 Bedrooms: LPA inspected all 5 bedrooms; the mattresses were in good condition, adequate lighting, plenty of dresser and closet space observed. Walls and floors were clean and in good condition. Comforters, bed linen, bath towels and mattress protectors were adequately stocked. Bathrooms: Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, and a non-skid mat was in place. Adequate lighting and toiletries are accessible to residents. LPA tested hot water temperature, and it measured between 105- and 120-degrees Fahrenheit. Required Postings: LPA observed all required documents posted throughout the facility. The facility has a working landline telephone. Kitchen LPA inspected the kitchen and observed all appliances to be in good working repair, including stove/oven, microwave, dishwasher, refrigerator. LPA observed an ample supply of cutlery, pots, pans, and bowls to be in good repair. LPA observed knives and additional sharps to be secured in locked drawer in the kitchen and are inaccessible to residents. LPA observed a 2-day supply of perishable foods, and a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods properly stored, packaged, and labeled. Page 2 of 2 Safety LPA observed 1 fully charged fire extinguisher inspected on 9/12/25. The last emergency drill was conducted on 1/5/26. Smoke detectors test and was operable File Review: LPA reviewed 4 resident files and found that 4 out of 4 had the required documents. LPA reviewed 3 staff files and found that 3 out 3 had the required documents, training, and certifications. Medications LPA observed all centrally stored medications secured All medications were observed in their original packaging. LPA reviewed a copy of the facility’s Liability Insurance with expiration date of 8/19/26 Infection Control LPA observed required infection control signs posted throughout the facility. LPA observed sanitizing stations throughout the facility. LPA observed an ample supply of cleaning supplies Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan posted with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. Facility maintains documentation of the required emergency drills. During today’s visit there were no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Angelique Gradney Page 3 of 3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 07/16/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mario Leon conducted an unannounced case management visit, with a focus on staff to resident ratio. LPA was met by staff one, Rachel Lugtu - House Manager (S1) and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA requested the staff roster (Dated: 07/01/25) and resident roster (dated: ) and LPA toured the facility. LPA observed the facility in a clean and tidy fashion. All walkways were clear, without obstructions. LPA observed three (3) rooms and all three (3) resident rooms had ample personal belongings storage for residents in care. All three (3) bedrooms had clean linens with a chair and lamp. During today's visit, LPA observed three (3) staff present. The census was presented, indicating four (4) residents. LPA then calculated the staff to resident ratio which was measured at three (3) staff : four (4) residents, which is within Title 22 regulation. There have been zero (0) deficiencies cited during today's visit and a copy of this report has been provided to staff one, Rachel Lugtu - House Manager (S1).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2025
May 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair (exposed wiring). Staff do not provide resident adequate personal accommodations.
On 05/08/2025 at 8:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an initial complaint visit regarding the allegations above. LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Rodolfo Lozada, and the purpose of the visit was explained. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On 05/08/25, LPA reviewed and obtained the client roster (dated 04/21/25), staff roster (dated 04/21/25), Admission agreement (dated 04/03/24), and Face sheet of resident #1 (R1), Home Depot Receipt of purchased (dated 04/14/25), LPA reviewed the Plan Of Operation, LPA interviewed three residents #1-3 (R1-R3), three staff members #1- 3 (S1-S3), and the Administrator (A1). LPA and the administrator toured the facility inside and out. Report continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: The Facility is in disrepair (exposed wiring). It has been alleged that there were exposed wires in the ceiling of one of the residents' rooms, where either a fan or an overhead light was connected. On May 8, 2025, between 8:30 AM and 9:00 AM, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) interviewed the administrator (A1) regarding the allegation facility is in disrepair due to exposed wiring in the facility. A1 explained that a resident had requested a replacement for the ceiling light bulb. On April 14, 2025, A1 went to Home Depot and purchased a ceiling light bulb, which resulted in the wiring being exposed temporarily; however, A1 assured that there were no safety issues and that the light bulb was replaced the same day. On May 8, 2025, between 9:00 AM and 10:30 AM, the LPA interviewed three residents (R1, R2, and R3). All three denied the allegation, stating that they had no issues with the electrical wiring in their rooms. R1 and R2 mentioned that three weeks prior, they had asked the administrator to change the light bulb in the ceiling. On May 8, 2025, between 10:30 AM and 11:30 AM, LPA Richard interviewed three staff members (S1, S2, and S3). All three staff members denied the allegation, stated that the facility is maintained in a clean, safe, sanitary condition and is in good repair at all times. Each staff member confirmed that there were no exposed wires in any resident rooms. Report continued on LIC9099-C On May 8, 2025, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted a tour of each room and found that all rooms were clean and free of exposed wires in the ceilings. LPA also observed a brand-new ceiling light in the resident's room, which was equipped with three light bulbs. Additionally, the LPA received a copy of the Home Depot receipt dated April 14, 2025, for the purchase of a flush mount black ceiling light. Based on interviews, observations, and a review of records, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Allegation #2 stated that staff do not provide residents with adequate personal accommodations. It is being alleged that a resident was using a small desk lamp to read, which the resident had purchased, and the resident's room appeared to be very dark. On May 8, 2025, between 8:30 AM and 9:30 AM, LPA interviewed A1 regarding the above allegation. A1 denied the allegation, stating that all the residents have a desk lamp in their room. We have some residents who don’t want to use it; they put the desk lamp in their closet, and they would rather use their own they purchased from the outside. Report continued LIC9099-C On May 8, 2025, between 9:00 AM and 10:30 AM, (LPA) Richard interviewed three residents (R1, R2, and R3). All three residents denied the allegations and stated that they had no issues with the desk lamp they purchased. Residents R1 and R2 stated that the ceiling lamp was too bright for reading at night, and they preferred to use the small desk lamp for their reading. On May 8, 2025, between 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM, LPA Richard interviewed three staff members #1-3 (S1, S2, and S3). All three staff members also denied the allegations and stated that residents were provided with desk lamps by the facility. During the visit, LPA observed that all residents' rooms contained the required furniture, including desk lamps. The rooms were well-lit and not dark. Based on the interviews and observations, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited, and an exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to staff member Rachel Lugtu.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250429140725
Jan 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/24/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Cathy Espino/Administrator. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve (6) residents ages 60 and above. Of which (5) may be non-ambulatory and (1) Bedridden. Approved hospice waiver for (1). Currently the facility has (5) residents. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of (5) resident bedrooms, (3) full bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, and patio area with shade located in backyard. The facility entrance and exits are wheelchair accessible. The facility has (1) garage that is utilized for supplies. LPA Iniguez and the Administrator toured the physical plant. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. LPA inspected a total of (5) bedrooms and (3) bathrooms. The beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the residents’ personal belongings was observed. The bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were operational. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were in operable condition. The water temperature ranged from 105.0°F to 116.2°F, and the room temperature ranged from 76°F to 78°F. The evaluation Report continues on the next page, LIC 809-C, providing further details of the inspection findings. During the visit, LPA Iniguez observed that the facility was clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished. Storage areas for personal hygiene were in place. Cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharp objects were stored in a way that made them inaccessible to residents in care. The kitchen was inspected, and there was sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available, which was adequately maintained. All fire extinguishers were charged and operable. The last Fire/Disaster Drills were conducted on 1/5/25. A review of (3) residents' service files and (2) staff personnel files was maintained in order. LPA reviewed (2) Medication Administration Records (MARs) and found no discrepancies. LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. All mandated inspection control posters were displayed throughout the facility. A copy of liability insurance was provided to LPA. Facility Annual Fess not current. LPA Iniguez provided PIN: 644543 to Cathy Espino/Administrator. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA did not observe deficiencies during this visit; therefore, no citations were issued. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Cathy Espino / Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jan 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/17/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Rachel Lugtu / House Manager. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to serve (6) residents ages 60 and above. Of which (5) may be non-ambulatory and (1) Bedridden. Approved hospice waiver for (1). The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists (5) resident bedrooms, (3) full bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, and patio area with shade located in backyard. The facility entrance and exits are wheelchair accessible. The facility has (1) garage that is utilized for supplies. LPA Iniguez toured the physical plant with House Manager. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. A total of (5) rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and storage for the resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were operational. LPA inspected the carbon monoxide detectors combo were in operable conditions. The water temperature measured: Kitchen 126.7°F, Bathroom #1:126.6°F, Bathroom #2:123.0°F. Evaluation Report Continues LIC 809-C LPA Iniguez observed the facility to be clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished at the time of the visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available maintained properly. All fire extinguishers were charged and were operable. A review of (3) residents' service files, (2) staff personnel files and (3) Medication Administration Records (MAR) were reviewed. First AID kit was checked. Last fire disaster drill was on:12/26/2023. LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. Liability insurance will be emailed to LPA. Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Facility Evaluation Report was provided to Rachel Lugtu /House Manager.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2024
Jan 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee is not adequately addressing a cockroach infestation at the facility.
On 01/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Wendy Gibbs, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility listed above to deliver the finding of the complaint. LPA met with Staff, Rachel Lugtu, and explained the purpose of today's visit. During today's visit three (3) clients were present. During today's visit, LPA conducted a facility tour, and received the most recent reciept form Aptive Enviromental, pest managment company On the previous visit conducted on 10/09/23, LPA conducted a facility tour with staff, conducted interviews with staff (S1 and S2) and residents (R1-R3), and requested and received copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. LPA received the following documents: Staff Roster, Resident Roster, and Resident Face Sheets. On 10/11/23, LPA received an emial from the Administrator containing the receipts from Aptive Enviromental, a pest control company. On 10/23/23, LPA spoke with resident's responsible party regarding what they have observed while at the facility. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Licensee is not adequately addressing a cockroach infestation at the facility. The allegation alleges that there have been cockroaches all around the facility since April 2023. During a file review, LPA received and reviewed copies of the facilities receipts from Aptive Environmental, a pest control company that comes out and treats the facility for ants, cockroaches, fleas, and spiders. The receipts are from July, September, and December. During LPAs two visits to the facility, LPA did not observe insects in the home. During interviews with Residents (R1-R3), two (2) out of three (3) stated there have been insects in the home in the past, but has gotten better. During interviews with Residents Responsible Party, stated that the issue has gotten much better and that they haven't seen any insects in the facility is some time. During interviews with staff (S1 and S2) two (2) out of two (2) stated in the past they have seen insects in the facility, but has gotten better since there has been a pest control company coming out and providing services. Additionally, staff stated new cocking was done around the sink and counters and they ensure the facility is clean and laundry is done on a daily basis. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. During today's visit LPA did not observe or cite any deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted with Staff, Rachel Lugtu, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2024 · control 11-AS-20230929114331
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not keep a resident's room free from odor Staff did not properly maintain a resident's bed while in care Staff did not ensure a resident showered while in care Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident
THIS REPORT SUPERSEDES THE REPORT DATED 12/13/2023 FOR CLARIFY THE CIRCUMSTANCE FOR THE ALLEGATIONS. ALTHOUGH THIS REPORT SUPERSEDES THE PREVIOUS REPORT THE COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION FINDINGS HAVE NOT CHANGED: SUBSTANTIATED Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced visit to Golden Care Living Facility on 12/13/2023 and was greeted by Administrator Angelique Gradney (A1). LPA Calderon spoke to A1 prior to entering the facility to conduct a risk assessment. LPA Calderon explained the purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. During this investigation, LPA Calderon interviewed A1, S1-S2, R1-R4. These interviews were conducted on 12/13/2023. On 12/13/2023 LPA Calderon obtained and reviewed copies of the following: Eviction letter (date 10/11/2018 and 3/12/2019), Physician Report (dated 01/18/2018), Capability assessment (date 2/13/2017). Needs and Service plan (date 2/3/2022) Toured the facility (date 12/13/2023). The investigation revealed the following: Substantiated Regarding Allegation #1: Staff did not keep a resident’s room free from odor. This complaint alleged staff did not keep R1 room free from odor. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with A1. A1 states that R1 refuses to allow staff to clean R1 room or allow pest control to spray for fruit flies. A1 states that staff cleans R1 room and attempts to control the odor in R1 room. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with S1-S2. 2 out of 2 staff state that R1 refuses to allow staff to clean R1 room. 2 out of 2 staff state that when R1 is not in R1 room staff cleans R1 room. 2 out of 2 staff state that staff attempts to control the room odor but due to R1 urine it is hard to control odor in R1 room. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with R1-R4. 4 out of 4 residents were not capable of answering any questions due to health issues. On 12/13/2023 LPA Calderon toured the facility with A1. LPA Calderon noted R1 room had an odor of urine. LPA Calderon noted R1 in soiled pants while inside R1 room. Regarding Allegation #2: Staff did not properly maintain a resident’s bed while in care. This complaint alleged staff did not maintain bed for R1. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with A1. A1 states that R1 does not allow staff to clean his bed or change R1 mattress sheets. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with S1-S2. 2 out of 2 staff state that R1 does not allow staff to clean R1 bed. 2 out of 2 staff state that when R1 is not inside R1 room staff changes R1 bed sheets. 2 out of 2 staff state that R1 does not allow staff to put plastic sheet on the bed to protect the mattress from R1 urine. On 12/13/2023 LPA Calderon toured the facility with A1. LPA Calderon noted that R1 bed had a urine spot. Appears R1 had urinated in the bed. LPA Calderon noted R1 bed mattress was soiled and ripped up and needs to be replaced. LPA Calderon noted that staff wanted to put clean sheets on R1 wet bed without addressing the urine spot in R1 mattress. Regarding Allegation #3: Staff did not ensure a resident showered while in care. This complaint alleged staff did not make sure R1 showered or clean self. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with A1. A1 states that R1 refuses to take a shower or have staff help R1 to take a shower. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with S1-S2. 2 out of 2 staff state that R1 refuses to take a shower and staff cannot force R1 to take a bath or shower. 2 out of 2 staff state that R1 can take a shower by R1 self. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with R1 who was sitting in a wheelchair. R1 appeared confused and under the influence of alcohol. LPA Calderon noted that R1 had a vodka bottle on the side of R1 wheelchair and was taking drinks out of the bottle. LPA Calderon asked R1 to stop drinking prior to the interview. R1 states that R1 has not taken a shower for 3 days. 3 out of 3 residents were not able to give an interview regarding showering due to health issues. On 12/13/2023 LPA Calderon toured the facility with A1. LPA Calderon noted that R1 appeared to not be clean and was wearing soiled pants. LPA Calderon noted R2-R4 appeared to be clean and wearing clean clothes. LPA Calderon did not review any shower logs for R1 or any other resident. Reviewed capability assessment (date 2/13/2017) for R1, baths or showers without help, uses toilet by self. Reviewed physician report (date 1/18/2018) for R1, report notes health issues. Reviewed resident appraisal (date 2/3/2022) for R1, noted health issues for R1. Reviewed needs and service plan (dated 2/3/2022) for R1, noted health issues. Regarding Allegation #4: Staff did report an incident involving a resident. This complaint alleged staff did not keep incident reports for R1. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with A1. A1 states that R1 has lived in the facility for the past 6 years. A1 states that no incident reports have been written up on R1 actions such as not showering and refusing to allow staff to clean R1 room. A1 states that S1 kept handwritten notes from 07/01/2023 to 12/01/2023 regarding R1 not allowing staff to clean R1 room, R1 refusal to take a bath or shower or clean R1 bed. LPA Calderon conducted an interview with S1-S2. 2 out of 2 staff state that they did not write any formal incident reports regarding R1 room, refusal to take a shower, change R1 bed or sheets. 2 out of 2 staff state that S1 kept some handwritten notes for R1 from 7/1/2023 to 12/01/2023 regarding R1 refusal to take a shower, clean R1 bed or room or control the odor in R1 room. LPA Calderon reviewed R1 facility notes and LPA Calderon could not find any incident reports for R1 regarding room odor, bed status, or showering. Based on interviews, observations, and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegations of “staff did not keep a residents room free from odor”, “staff did not properly maintains a residents bed while in care”, “staff did not ensure a resident showered while in care”, “staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident “is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) the following deficiency has been observed and citation issued (ref LIC9099D). A face-to-face meeting was conducted with Administrator Angelique Gradney and a hard copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023 · control 11-AS-20231206154114
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80072(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2023
80072 Personal Rights (a) Except for children’s residential facilities, each client shall have personal rights...(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs.This requirement was not met as evidence by: Licensee did not ensure that resident room was clean and free of odor.This poses an immediate health and safety risk to all residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will confirm staff cleans residents room and controls the odor for room. Licensee will confirm resident room free of odor by 12/22/2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80072(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2023
80072 Personal Rights (a) Except for children’s residential facilities, each client shall have personal rights...(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs.This requirement was not met as evidence by: LIcensee did not change the bed and sheets This poses an immediate health and safety risk to all residents in care. This requirement was not met as evidence by:the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will make sure that resident mattress is replaced and a plastic sheet is put on bed to control resident urine.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80069.2(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2023
80069.2 Functional Capabilites Assessment (a) In order to determine whether the facility's program meets a client's services needs,(A) Does not bathe or shower self. This requirement was not met as evidence by: LIcensee did not ensure resident took a shower. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to all residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure resident take a show and keep shower log notes and show LPA proof of shower logs bu POC date
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80061(b)(1)(e) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2023
80061 Reporting Requirements (b) Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the facility, (1) Events reported shall include the following:(E) Any unusual incident or client absence which threatens the physical or emotional health or safety of any client.This requirement was not met as evidence by: Licensee did not generate incident reports for resident refusal to shower, clean resident room or change the bed sheets. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to allthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee shall keep detailed records and incident repots for resodent care.
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 8 documents
20234 state visits · 5 documents
May 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff sexually abused a resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ana Soto conducted a subsequent complaint investigation to deliver findings and decisions for the allegation listed above. Today’s complaint investigation was conducted with Rachel Lugtu, House Manager IB conducted investigation, IB investigator Laarni Santiago’s investigation consisted of following: Interviews and Record reviews. Between 08/11/22 – 11/08/22, IB investigator interviewed W#1 – W#14. LPA Cifuentes requested and received the following documents on 07/28/22: Staff roster, resident roster, and other documents pertinent to the investigation. Unsubstantiated Based on the IB’s investigation, the investigation revealed the following. For Allegation – Staff sexually abused a resident in care. Interviews were conducted with collateral agencies and pertinent parties which revealed that there is insufficient evidence indicative of the alleged sexual abuse committed by staff. Although the informant perpetuated the alleged, staff refuted the claim and there were no witnesses to corroborate the incident. The victim could not disclose sexual abuse and was unable to provide a name or description of the staff due to their medical condition. Other residents were interviewed and denied any history of sexual abuse or misconduct by staff. Administrator and other staff members did not disclose any concerns pertaining to staff toward residents. Investigation revealed that there was insufficient evidence to support the alleged sexual abuse, therefore, the alleged is found to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated An interview was conducted with Rachel Lugtu, House Manager and a hard copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023 · control 11-AS-20220727140407
Mar 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 03/13/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet initiated a case management visit to the above facility. Today’s case management visit was conducted with Rachel Lugtu care staff and spoke with Administrator Catherine Espino via telephone, and today's visit was explained. The purpose of the visit was to follow up on a Proof of Correction in association with complaint # 11-AS-20201222113312. LPA inspected the facility. During the inspection, LPA observed room #1 for resident #1 (R1) did not have a closet space available for personal items. LPA identified a closet door with a hanging padlock utilized for staff personal clothing, hygiene supplies, and three 3) clothing items that belong to (R1). According to Lugtu, the resident was prevented from accessing (R1's) clothing items as the resident would take the items and wash them in the bathroom and they were concerned for (R1's) safety. An interview with administrator Espino expressed she was not informed by the care staff that had made these modifications in (R1's) room. A resident not having access to personal items is of Title 22 Section 87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities and not having a closet space and is a violation of Title 22 Section 87307 Personal Accommodations and Services. Based on the interviews and observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency has been observed and citation issued (ref. LIC 9099-D). An exit interview was conducted with Rachel Lugtu, copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 27, 2023
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Resident #1 was not accorded a comfortable accomdations and did not have access to to personal clothing items. This violation is a potential risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee & Administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87468.1 and send a written statement to CCLD by the POC date that they will ensure that all residents in care are provided Personal Rights. A plan to address the behavior without violating the resident's rights. POC is due to the CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by the POC date of 03/27/23,.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(E) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 27, 2023
87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (E) Portable or permanent closets and drawer space in the bedrooms for clothing and personal belongings. A minimum of eight (8) cubic feet (.743 cubic meters) of drawer space per resident shall be provided. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Resident #1 was not accorded a comfortable accomdations and did not have a closet space as required by Title 22 Sec 87307. This violation is a potential risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee & Administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87307 and send a written statement to CCLD by the POC date that they will ensure that all residents in care are provided a comfortable enviroment. A plan to address the missing closet space. POC is due to the CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by the POC date of 03/27/23,.
Mar 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On 03/13/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet initiated a case management visit to the above facility to clear POCs. Today’s case management visit was conducted with Rachel Lugtu care staff and spoke with Administrator Catherine Espino via telephone, and today's visit was explained. LPA and toured the entire facility to inspect if corrections were made for citations cited on 02/11/23 for complaint # 11-AS-20201222113312. Proof of corrections were sent via facsimile 02/12/23 and 02/16/23: The administrator dd clear the following citations: Administrators Qualifications and Duties - 87405 (a-C) Personnel Requirements – General - 87411(a) Allowable Health Conditions and the Use of Home Health Agencies - 87609 (c) Prohibited Health Conditions - 87615 (a)(1) Observation of the Resident - 87466 Citations that were all cleared did not incur civil penalties. An exit interview was conducted with Rachel Lugtu, copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2023
Feb 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care. Staff failed to meet the resident's needs. Staff failed to meet resident's incontinence needs.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted an unannounced subsequent visit at this facility. LPA was greeted by care staff (S2) Rachel Lugtu. LPA conducted a risk assessment prior to entering the facility. Lugtu informed LPA that the facility has no COVID cases nor do any of the residents or staff have symptoms. Lugtu contacted administrator (S1) Catherine Espino by phone and LPA explained the purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted the 10-day tele-visit (via FaceTime) on 12/24/2020 approximately 4:45 p.m. with Administrator Angelique Gradney. LPA toured the facility (via FaceTime) with Administrator and requested copies of the following documents: facility staff and resident rosters; Admission Agreement, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Physician’s Report, medical records (to include hospital records), Medication Administration Records (July 2021), and Unusual Incident/Injury Report for Resident #1. A separate investigation was conducted by the Department of Social Services, Investigator Jose Santana that included a review of hospital medical records, interview with witnesses, facility staff, and medical services staff. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Substantiated INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Regarding Allegation #1: this investigation revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on 08/21/20 with an open wound to the right hip – measuring: 8cm x 0.2cm. Upon discharge on 08/24/20, home health services were obtained, effective 08/25/20. Despite regular wound care by home health nurses, Resident #1’s right-hip wound worsened over time; and, the wounds increased in number to include pressure injuries on their bilateral heels. On Resident #1’s return from hospitalization on 08/25/20, there was an order for the fungal rash: cleanse with soap and water, pat dry, apply Miconazole Topical 2% and Calmoseptine, and leave open to air. Although, it is possible that Resident #1’s scratching of their wounds and fungal infection prevented the pressure injuries from resolving, it is more likely that unattended moisture and failure to reposition the resident every two (2) hours at night contributed to the progression of the pressure injuries. Witness #4 (Home Health Care Manager) believes the lack of frequent repositioning and keeping Resident #1 dry overnight was the primary reason why the right hip progressed from Stage II pressure injury at the beginning of home health services to an Unstageable pressure injury – measuring: 4.6cm x 1.8cm x 0.2cm by 09/14/20. As of 01/20/21, the right hip pressure injury remained Unstageable. The facility retained Resident #1; and, the resident’s pressure injury was over a Stage II, a prohibited health condition. Based on interviews, observations, and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation of NEGLECT/LACK OF CARE AND SUPERVISION: Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding Allegation #2: this investigation revealed that the Home Health Agency skilled nurse was aware that Resident #1 was not being repositioned overnight because there was no nighttime caregiver available. Despite regular wound care by the home health nurses, Resident #1’s right-hip wound worsened over time; and, the Home Health Agency skilled nurse recommended that Resident #1 be transferred to a higher level of care. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Lack of frequent repositioning every two (2) hours and keeping Resident #1 dry overnight was the primary reason why the right hip progressed from a Stage II pressure injury to Unstageable. Evaluation Report continues LIC-9099-C Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation of LEVEL OF CARE: Staff failed to meet the resident’s needs is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency has been observed and citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D). Regarding Allegation #3: this investigation revealed that the facility hired live-in caregivers with no designated awake night staff. Residents who required overnight care (i.e., incontinence care and pressure injury prevention, such as, turning and repositioning every two (2) hours are not always receiving the care they need. In addition, Home Health Agency skilled nurse reiterated instructions for facility caregivers to turn and reposition Resident #1 every two (2) hours, to change diaper promptly after incontinence episodes. Based on interviews conducted, the majority staff corroborated that they are not paid to work overnight; therefore, turning and repositioning Resident #1 at 9:00 p.m., 11:00 p.m., 1:00 a.m., and 3:00 a.m. was not being done. Staff #2 (Lead Caregiver/House Manager) admitted that Resident #1 was not always turned and repositioned every two (2) hours overnight, but maybe at 9:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: There is no overnight staff to assist residents with personal hygiene (incontinence care) needs. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation of LEVEL OF CARE: Staff failed to meet resident’s incontinence needs is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency has been observed and citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D). ****Civil penalty is assessed.*** An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Report and Appeal Rights were provided to Administrator Catherine Espino.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2023 · control 11-AS-20201222113312
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2023
Section 87615(a)(1) Prohibited Health Conditions: Persons who require health services or have a health condition including... shall not be... retained in a... care facililty sores (dermal ulcers). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Resident #1 was diagnosed with Unstageable and Stage 3 dermal ulcers on 08/21/22 and Administrator retained Resident #1 at the facility following Resident #1’s discharge from the hospital on 08/24/22 with “Unstageable” and “Stage III” wounds. This violation poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall read Title 22, Section "Prohibited Health Conditions"...send a written statement to CCLD that they will ensure to stay in constant communication with medical professional(s) and if the resident's medical condition elevates; meaning they require a higher level of care, they will ensure the resident is relocated to a skilled-nursing facility (SNF) or hospital... Civil penalties are assessed in the amount of Five-hundred Dollars ($500) for retaining Resident #1 with a prohibited health condition. This plan is due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 02/12/23.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2023
87466 Observation of the Resident: The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Home Health Agency skilled nurse was aware that Resident #1 was not being repositioned overnight because there was no nighttime caregiver available to do so and recommended Resident #1 to a higher level of care. This violation poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87466 “Observation of the Resident” and send a written statement to CCLD that you have read and understand this section. This plan is due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 02/12/23.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(a)-(C) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 27, 2023
Section 87405(a)–(c) Administrator - Qualifications and Duties:(a) All Facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator...The administrator shall have sufficient freedom from other responsibilities and shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours... to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility as specified in this...have qualifications adequate to be responsible and accountable for management and administration... (b) The administrator of a facility or facilities shall have the responsibility and authority to carry out the policies of the licensee. (c) Failure to comply with all licensing requirements... may constitute cause for revocation of the license of the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Resident #1 was transported to the hospital on 08/21/21 and hospital staff noted Stage II pressure injury to their right hip. By November 2020, Resident #1’s right hip developed from a Stage II to Unstageable/Stage III. This violation poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87405(a)–(c) “Administrator - Qualifications and Duties” and send a written statement to CCLD that you have read and understand this section. This plan is due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 02/27/23
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87609(C) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2023
87609(c) Allowable Health Conditions and the Use of Home Health Agencies: (c) The use of home health agencies to care for a resident’s medical condition(s) does not expand the scope of care and supervision that the licensee is required to provide. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Home Health Agency skilled nurse provided training to facility staff on how to turn and reposition resident every two (2) hours; of which, facility staff failed to turn and reposition Resident #1 every two (2) hours over night. This violation poses an immediatel health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87609(c) "Allowable Health Conditions" and send a written statement to CCLD that licensee and home health agency agree (in writing) on the responsibilities of the home health agency and those of the licensee in caring for the resident’s medical condition. This plan due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 02/12/23.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 27, 2023
Section 87411(a) Personnel Requirements – General: (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff... ensure provision of ...care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: There is no overnight staff to assist residents with personal hygiene (incontinence care) needs. This violation poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87411(a) “Personnel Requirements – General” and send a written statement to CCLD that licensee has read and understands that facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident’s needs. This plan due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 02/27/23.
Feb 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 2/9/2023 LPA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with Administrator/Cathy Espino and Caregiver/Rachel Lugtu. There are currently (4) residents residing in the facility. The facility is licensed to serve (6) elderly residents 60 and over. The facility is approved to support (1) hospice, (1) bedridden resident and (4) non-ambulatory residents. At this time, there is (3) non-ambulatory, and (1) bedridden hospice resident living at this facility. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists (5) resident bedrooms, (3) full bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, and patio area with shade located in backyard. The facility entrance and exits are wheelchair accessible. The facility has (1) garage that is utilized for supplies. LPA observed required posting at the entrance and throughout the facility. The facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested are operational. The light switches contain night-light in hallways . Restroom #1, #2 and #3 has non-skid mats and grab bars. Fire extinguisher is up to code. LPA observed a sign-in/sanitation station at the facility entry. Facility has screening process for visitors, sanitizer/soap, paper towels, and additional PPE supplies are stored in the garage. The facility is prepared to provide a private room for isolation if needed. The facility mitigation plan was approved by CCL on 4/11/2021. No citations were issued during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Cathy Espino and copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2023
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 28, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Stephanie Cifuentes conducted an unannounced case management visit for deficiencies observed during investigation of complaint 11-AS-20220727140407 on 7/28/2022. LPA met with assistant administrator Catherine Espino and explained the purpose of today’s visit is to issue citations and was granted permission to enter the premises. During tour of facility grounds LPA Cifuentes noted the following deficiencies: 1. At 10:20am LPA Cifuentes noted that Physician's Report for Resident 1(R1) is not signed by a physician. 2. At 10:18am LPA Cifuentes observed that R1 and R2 do not have TB tests. 3. At 11:18am LPA Cifuentes noted an assortment of empty boxes, boards and electrical parts around perimeter of facility. At 11:26am LPA noted that light in bathroom 2 is in disrepair and at 11:30am LPA observed pests in facility kitchen. 4. 11:33 LPA observed unlocked drawer in the kitchen were knives were stored and at 12:02pm LPA observed lock to closet were toxins are stored was not locked. 5. At 11:33am LPA Cifuentes observed knife in container on kitchen counter and at 11:38am, 11:46am, 11:50am and LPA Cifuentes observed toxins in both bathrooms and R1's room that were not in a locked area. 6. At 11:42 am and 11:44am LPA Cifuentes observed half-bed rails in bedrooms of R1, resident 2 (R2) and resident 3 (R3) and no physicians order was found in residents files. 7. At 11:56am LPA Cifuentes noted medication administration record was not marked for resident R3 from dates of 7/22/2022 until 7/28/2022. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the above-mentioned deficiencies were observed, and citations issued (809-D) An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided to Staff Catherine Espino.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2022
Storage Space Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, at 11:33am LPA Cifuentes observed kinfe in container on kitchen counter and at 11:38am, 11:46am and 11:50am LPA Cifuentes observed toxins in two of the bathrooms and R1's room. This is an immediate health and safety hazard for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will store toxins an knives in a locked area inaccesible to clients and will review regulation 87309 with staff. POC will be submitted to CCLD via fax by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87309(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2022
Storage Space Storage areas for poisons, and firearms and other dangerous weapons shall be locked. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, 11:33 LPA observed unlocked drawer in the kitchen where knives are stored. At 12:02pm LPA observed lock to closet were toxins are stored was not locked. This is an immediate health and safety hazard for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Adminstrator will lock all storage areas containing knives, toxins/poisons. POC will be submitted to CCLD via fax by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2022
Medical Assessment Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, At 10:20am LPA Cifuentes noted that Physician's Report for Resident 1 (R1) is not signed by a physician. This is a potentail health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Adminsitrator will obtain a Physician's report for R1 and review with staff regulaition section 87458 and write a statement confirming they have read and understood regulation. Facility will submit POC to CCLD via fax by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2022
Medical Assessment A physical examination of the resident indicating the physician's primary diagnosis and secondary diagnosis, if any and results of an examination for communicable tuberculosis...which would preclude care of the person by the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, At 10:18am LPA Cifuentes observed that R1and R2 do not have a TB test. This is a potential heath and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Adminsitrator will obtain TB tests for R1 and R2 and send POC to CCLD by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2022
Maintenance and Operation The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors THis requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, at 11:18am LPA Cifuentes noted an assortment of empty boxes, boards and electrical parts around perimeter of facility. At 11:26am and 11:58am LPA noted that lights in bathroom 1 and 2 are in disrepair. At 11:30am LPA Cifuentes observed pests in facility kitchen. This is a potential health and safety risk for the clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will fix lights and make and implement a plan for pest control involving a pest control companh and send proof of correction to CCLD via fax by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87608(a)3 · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2022
Postural Supports A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident’s record. The licensing agency shall be authorized to require other additional documentation if needed to verify the order. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, At 11:42 am and 11:44am LPA Cifuentes observed half-bed rails in bedrooms of R1, resident 2(R2) and resident 3 (R3) and a lap belt on R3 and no physicians order was found in residents files.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will remove rails from beds and lap belt from resident until a physicians order is obtained and plan of correction is submitted to CCLD via fax by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2022
Resident Records The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, at 11:56am LPA Cifuentes noted medication administration record was not marked for resident R3 from dates of 7/22/2022 until 7/28/2022.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will review medication adminstration practices with staff and submit a sign in sheet and summary of topics covered to CCLD via fax by POC due date.
Mar 24, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/24/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced Annual required visit with a primary focus on infection control measures. LPA Calderon was met by caregiver Rachael Augto and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The facility is licensed to serve 6 elderly 59 years or older. There are currently 3 residents in care. There are 3 non-ambulatory clients. The facility is a one-story structure with 5 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and patio. LPA Calderon and Administrator toured the physical plant. There are no bodies of water or firearm/ammunition on the premises. All client rooms were checked. Beds and bedding were in good condition, adequate lighting provided, storage for client personal belongings was observed. Walls and floors were in good repair. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. LPA Calderon observed the facility to be clean and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning agents, toxins, and sharps were accessible to clients. The kitchen was inspected and there is an enough perishable and non-perishable food available which is stored properly. Fire extinguisher was charged, smoke detectors and Carbon Monoxide were operable. During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff and residents, sanitizing stations (Located in common areas and restrooms). LPA observed staff and residents were wearing face coverings, an isolation room and required postings throughout the facility. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA advised the Administrator to continuously monitor the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website and Community Care Likening Provider Informational Notices (PIN) for any updates relating to COVID-19 guidance. During today’s visit there were no deficiencies observed under California code of regulation title 22, division 6, chapter 8. Exit interview held. A copy of the report was provided to Administrator Rachael Augto.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2022
Feb 4, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff failed to seek timely medical attention for resident. Resident's toileting needs are not being met. Resident's hygiene needs are not being met.' Facility staff left resident in soiled bedding Facility staff left resident in a soiled diaper. Facility staff do not keep accurate records about resident in care.
On 02/04/2022 around 01:00pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon initiated a complaint investigation to deliver the investigation findings for the allegation listed above. Due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19), and to implement mitigation measures, today’s complaint investigation was conducted telephonically via face time with Administrator Angelique Gradney. The Investigation consisted of the following: On 01/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed Administrator Angelique Gradney (S1) and conducted a tour of the physical plant. On 2/01/2021 LPA obtained copies of Staff and Resident rosters, Resident #1’s record (Needs and Service Plan, Pre-Placement Appraisal, MARS (3 months), medical records, Physicians Report and Medication list), ER medical reports Fire report. On 1/29/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed reporting party. On 2/01/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S5 and on 03/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed R1–R3. On 05/06/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2 regarding night crew. On 07/05/2022 LPA Calderon interviewed S1 for second time. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff failed to seek timely medical attention for resident. It is alleged on Staff failed to seek timely medical attention for resident. On 01/12/2021 witness 1 stated that 911 was called and his unit of the Los Angeles Fire Department arrived around 8 am and entered the facility. W1 Fire captain noted that R1 urine and catheter had dislocated and therefore 911 was called. W1 states that he does not think this is elder abuse as R1 had just soiled himself and the night staff did not know how to change the catheter for R1. On 01/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator S1 who stated her night staff did not have a chance to clean the resident or change R1 catheter and additional training was needed. On 03/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed R1-R3 could not answer questions due to dementia. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S5 who all stated that they also work the night shift and always take care of all resident’s medical needs. On 05/06/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2 who stated he worked the night shift and that R1 catheter dislodged around 5pm and he believes R1 had issues some time between the day and night shift. S2 stated additional training was done with all staff regarding catheter issues. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon reviewed Needs and Service Plan, Pre-Placement Appraisal, MARS (3 months, medical records, Physicians Report and Medication list, ER medical reports an1d Fire report. The reports state that staff does take care of resident’s medical needs and keeps records for review. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Resident's toileting needs are not being met. It is alleged on Resident's toileting needs are not being met. On 01/29/2021 Witness 1 stated that W` entered the facility and noted R1 had a soiled diaper and the bed was soiled. W1 states that W1 does not think this is elder abuse as R1 had just soiled himself and the night crew had not had a chance to clean R1 and R1 bed. On 01/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator S1 who state S1 night staff did not have a chance to clean the resident or R1 bed and that W1 received paperwork stating the resident had been cleaned and R1 bed was changed. On 03/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed R1-R3 who stated that staff does take care of their hygiene needs and cleans their room daily. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S5 who all stated that they always take care of all residents needs to include soiled bedding, hygiene needs, medical attention, and keep records of what they do for residents every day. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon reviewed Needs and Service Plan, Pre-Placement Appraisal, MARS (3 months, medical records, Physicians Report and Medication list, ER medical reports and Fire report. The reports state that staff does take care of residents needs and keeps records for review. On 04/28/2022 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator who stated that staff are not trained regarding Catheter replacement and that they call 911 or the hospice staff takes care of the resident’s needs. Administrator states that resident did not have a restrictive care plan as the hospice staff took care of resident’s medical needs or they called 911 Allegation: Resident's hygiene needs are not being met. It is alleged on Resident's hygiene needs are not being met. On 01/29/2021 Witness 1 stated that W1 entered the facility and noted R1 had a soiled diaper and the bed was soiled. W1 states that he does not think this is elder abuse as R1 had just soiled R1 self and the night crew had not had a chance to clean R1 and R1 bed. On 01/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator S1 who stated that S1 night staff did not have a chance to clean the resident or his bed prior to LAFD coming to the facility and that W1 received paperwork stating the resident had been cleaned and R1 bed was changed. On 03/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed R1-R3 who stated staff does take care of their hygiene needs and cleans their room daily. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S5 who all state that they always take care of all residents needs to include soiled bedding, hygiene needs, medical attention, and keep records of what they do for residents every day. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon reviewed Needs and Service Plan, Pre-Placement Appraisal, MARS (3 months, medical records, Physicians Report and Medication list, ER medical reports and Fire report. The reports state that staff does take care of residents needs and keeps records for review. On 04/28/2022 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator who stated that staff are not trained regarding Catheter replacement and that they call 911 or the hospice staff takes care of the resident’s needs. Administrator states that resident did not have a restrictive care plan as the hospice staff took care of resident’s medical needs or they called 911 Allegation: Facility staff left resident in soiled bedding. It is alleged on Facility staff left resident in soiled bedding. On 01/29/2021 Witness 1 stated that W1 entered the facility and noted R1 had a soiled diaper and the bed was soiled. W1 states that W1 does not think this is elder abuse as R1 had just soiled R1 self and the night crew had not had a chance to clean R1 and R1 bed. On 01/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator S1 who stated that S1 night staff did not have a chance to clean the resident or his bed prior to LAFD coming to the facility and that W1 received paperwork stating the resident had been cleaned and R1 bed was changed. On 03/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed R1-R3 who stated staff does take care of their hygiene needs and cleans their room daily. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S5 who all state that they always take care of all residents needs to include soiled bedding, hygiene needs, medical attention, and keep records of what they do for residents every day. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon reviewed Needs and Service Plan, Pre-Placement Appraisal, MARS (3 months, medical records, Physicians Report and Medication list, ER medical reports and Fire report. The reports state that staff does take care of residents needs and keeps records for review. 04/28/2022 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator who stated that staff are not trained regarding Catheter replacement and that they call 911 or the hospice staff takes care of the resident’s needs. Administrator states that resident did not have a restrictive care plan as the hospice staff took care of resident’s medical needs or they called 911 Allegation: Facility staff left resident in a soiled diaper. It is alleged on Facility staff left resident in a soiled diaper. On 01/29/2021 Witness 1 stated that W1 entered the facility and noted R1 had a soiled diaper and the bed was soiled. W1 states that W1 does not think this is elder abuse as R1 had just soiled R1 self and the night crew had not had a chance to clean R1 and R1 bed. On 01/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator S1 who stated that S1 night staff did not have a chance to clean the resident or R1 bed prior to LAFD coming to the facility and that W1 received paperwork stating the resident had been cleaned and R1 bed was changed. On 03/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed R1-R3 who stated staff does take care of their hygiene needs and cleans their room daily. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S5 who all state that they always take care of all residents needs to include soiled bedding, hygiene needs, medical attention, and keep records of what they do for residents every day. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon reviewed Needs and Service Plan, Pre-Placement Appraisal, MARS (3 months, medical records, Physicians Report and Medication list, ER medical reports and Fire report. The reports state that staff does take care of residents needs and keeps records for review. Facility staff do not keep accurate records about resident in care: On 01/29/2021 Witness 1 stated that he entered the facility and noted R1 had a soiled diaper and the bed was soiled. W1 states that W1 does not think this is elder abuse as R1 had just soiled R1 and the night crew had not had a chance to clean R1 and R1 bed. On 01/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed administrator S1 who stated that S1 night staff did not have a chance to clean the resident or R1 bed prior to LAFD coming to the facility and that W1 received paperwork stating the resident had been cleaned and R1 bed was changed. On 03/19/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed R1-R3 who stated staff does take care of their hygiene needs and cleans their room daily. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon interviewed S2-S5 who all state that they always take care of all residents needs to include soiled bedding, hygiene needs, medical attention, and keep records of what they do for residents every day. On 02/01/2021 LPA Calderon reviewed Needs and Service Plan, Pre-Placement Appraisal, MARS (3 months, medical records, Physicians Report and Medication list, ER medical reports and Fire report. The reports state that staff does take care of residents needs and keeps records for review. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. A telephonic exit interview was conducted with Administrator Angelique Gradney, and a hard copy was provided via email for recordsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2022 · control 11-AS-20210113083145
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 8, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Golden Care Living, Inc., licensed since 2008.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Golden Care Living III · Torrance
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 15
- Total complaints
- 6
- Substantiated allegations
- 7
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 6
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 6 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 7 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 6 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Golden Care Living
Is Golden Care Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Golden Care Living licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Golden Care Living been cited?
3 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Golden Care Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Golden Care Living cost?
$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in Rancho Palos Verdes that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,625 to $5,875 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Golden Care Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Golden Care Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Golden Care Living, Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South Bay is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Golden Care Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Golden Care Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “GOLDEN CARE LIVING, INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197607206. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Golden Care Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 6 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is February 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County