Prospect Manor is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in South Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197603952, licensed for 99 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 23, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 18 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2021 to December 5, 2025. 18 of the 18 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 18 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 18 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Feb 23, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provided medical attention to resident as needed. Staff did not follow resident’s care plan
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Jose De Leon and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/5/25 LPA Flores conducted an initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed administrator and nurse and collected the following documents for Resident #1’s (R1) file and requested copies of physician’s report, needs and care plan, identification and emergency sheet, admission agreement, hospital discharge documents, medication sheets, and home health plan. On 8/28/25 LPA Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit and interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. On 9/18/25 LPA Flores contacted Home Health Agency. On 11/24/25 LPA Flores contacted R1 over the phone. On 12/5/25 LPA Flores delivered findings. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250728111411
Aug 30, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.
*This report is a corrected version of report dated 8/5/25 to change finding and substantiated one of the allegations and add additional information.* Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Janice Somera and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. On 8/7/25 LPA interviewed South Pasadena Police Department officer. On 8/11/25 LPA Flores interviewed R1's rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423
Aug 15, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with the administrator, Lydia Pabion. The purpose of the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff roster, resident roster, and documents on Resident #1 (R1). LPA interviewed the administrator, 3 Staff, and 5 Residents. R1 was not available for the interview today. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was found by law enforcement and was in the hospital for dehydration. According to staff interviews, R1 was not in the facility around 7 pm on 8/5/25. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250808152943
Aug 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met Lydia Pabion with and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. It is alleged that on 5/7/25, R1 was attacked by roommate resulting in an injury. (the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423
Jan 21, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 29, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident eloping from the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/15/24 LPA conducted and initial complaint investigation visit. During the initial visit LPA requested staff/resident roster, resident #1(R1)’s physician’s report dated: 8/21/23, admission agreement, pre-appraisal, needs and care plan, medication sheet, incident report. LPA interviewed Resident #1-#3(R1-R3) and 5 staff. On 10/18/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) case manager over the phone and obtained documents. On 10/21/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) over the phone. On 10/29/24 LPA Flores delivered findings for the above allegation. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024 · control 28-AS-20241011081106
Oct 10, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglected resident's wound in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to continue investigation and deliver findings for the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Lydia Pabion and discussed purpose of visit. LPA interviewed Five (5) residents and one (1) additional staff S#1 during this visit. LPA took tour of facility and did not observed any health and safety Hazards. On 09/25/2023; LPA conducted a health and safety check and took a tour of the physical plant including the common areas, kitchen, dining room, medications room, and five (5) resident rooms. LPA measured the water temperature, and it was within 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed that there was at least a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods, and a 2-day supply of perishable foods and medications were centrally stored and locked. The facility was clean and in good repair and there were no observable signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. (Continue on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024 · control 28-AS-20230922133247
Oct 10, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 4, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explain the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested copies of staff/resident roster, reviewed resident #1’s file, and requested copies of identification and emergency sheet, physician’s report, admission agreement, notice to pay rent, receipts for payment from January 2023 – February 2024, to the facility. LPA interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation Illegal eviction it is alleged R1 was given an eviction notice on 2/23/24, for lack of rent payment, per complainant R1 has paid the rent in full every month. Interviews conducted with administrator and licensee revealed R1 has not been given an eviction notice yet. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240226102810
Feb 15, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 9, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide correct medication. Untrained staff is providing medication to residents. Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff not assisting resident with needs.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Lydia Pabion, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/28/2023. During the initial and subsequent complaint visits, the investigation consisted of the following: LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility, interviewed Resident #1- Resident #11 (R1- R11) and Staff #1- Staff #7 (S1- S7) altogether. LPA unable to interview Staff #8 (S8) who was not on duty. LPA also attempted to interview Resident #12 (refused to speak to LPA/on Hospice care) and Resident #13 (R13) - Resident #14 (R14) but unsuccessful as they are both non verbal. LPA obtained copies of the Resident and Staff Rosters, reviewed Residents #1-#2 (R1-R2's) file documents such as; Face Sheet, Needs and Services Plan, Physician's Report LIC 602, and Progress notes. Additionally, (5) Staff files, (3) additional Resident filesthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231222091841
Jan 9, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is sleeping at the facility.
*This report supersedes report dated 11/07/2023 due to findings changed for 1 allegation* Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "staff are sleeping at the facility", it is alleged that staff are sleeping at the facility during their shifts. Administrator stated 2 months ago she reviewed her camera footage and noticed a graveyard staff sleeping on job. She confronted the staff and the staff resigned on 09/14/23. Administrator stated this was a one tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231030095916
Nov 7, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has bedbugs. Staff are sleeping at the facility.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "facility has bedbugs", it is alleged that there are bedbugs in rooms 201, 205, 227 and the facility's TV room. Administrator denied the allegation and stated no bedbugs complaints have been brought to her attention. Staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegations. Residents in rooms 201 and 227 denied having bedbugs and resident in room 205 was out in the community and not available for an interview. (the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231030095916
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Prospect Manor licensed?
Yes — Prospect Manor is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in South Pasadena (Los Angeles County): California license #197603952, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 99 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Prospect Manor care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Prospect Manor with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 & OVER. APPROVED FOR 99 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 35 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4. BEDRIDDEN CLEARED RMS: 102,104,105,106,107,109,110,115,116,117,118,119,123.
How much does Prospect Manor cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Prospect Manor's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Prospect Manor accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Prospect Manor through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
47 of 99 beds occupied (47%) when the state visited on December 5, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Prospect Manor?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Prospect Manor; 18 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 5, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(626) 799-1141Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Prospect Manor? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.