Prospect Manor is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in South Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197603952, licensed for 99 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Prospect Manor

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 99 residents · South Pasadena, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197603952, held since 2003 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
800 Prospect Ave · South Pasadena, Los Angeles County
Phone
(626) 799-1141
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 35 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 & OVER. APPROVED FOR 99 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 35 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4. BEDRIDDEN CLEARED RMS: 102,104,105,106,107,109,110,115,116,117,118,119,123.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 23, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 23, 2026
Occupancy at the December 5, 2025 visit
47 of 99 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 18 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2021 to December 5, 2025. 18 of the 18 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 18 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 18 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provided medical attention to resident as needed. Staff did not follow resident’s care plan

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Jose De Leon and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/5/25 LPA Flores conducted an initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed administrator and nurse and collected the following documents for Resident #1’s (R1) file and requested copies of physician’s report, needs and care plan, identification and emergency sheet, admission agreement, hospital discharge documents, medication sheets, and home health plan. On 8/28/25 LPA Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit and interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. On 9/18/25 LPA Flores contacted Home Health Agency. On 11/24/25 LPA Flores contacted R1 over the phone. On 12/5/25 LPA Flores delivered findings. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250728111411
Aug 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.

*This report is a corrected version of report dated 8/5/25 to change finding and substantiated one of the allegations and add additional information.* Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Janice Somera and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. On 8/7/25 LPA interviewed South Pasadena Police Department officer. On 8/11/25 LPA Flores interviewed R1's rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423
Aug 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with the administrator, Lydia Pabion. The purpose of the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff roster, resident roster, and documents on Resident #1 (R1). LPA interviewed the administrator, 3 Staff, and 5 Residents. R1 was not available for the interview today. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was found by law enforcement and was in the hospital for dehydration. According to staff interviews, R1 was not in the facility around 7 pm on 8/5/25. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250808152943
Aug 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met Lydia Pabion with and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. It is alleged that on 5/7/25, R1 was attacked by roommate resulting in an injury. (the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 7 documents
Oct 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident eloping from the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/15/24 LPA conducted and initial complaint investigation visit. During the initial visit LPA requested staff/resident roster, resident #1(R1)’s physician’s report dated: 8/21/23, admission agreement, pre-appraisal, needs and care plan, medication sheet, incident report. LPA interviewed Resident #1-#3(R1-R3) and 5 staff. On 10/18/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) case manager over the phone and obtained documents. On 10/21/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) over the phone. On 10/29/24 LPA Flores delivered findings for the above allegation. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024 · control 28-AS-20241011081106
Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglected resident's wound in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to continue investigation and deliver findings for the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Lydia Pabion and discussed purpose of visit. LPA interviewed Five (5) residents and one (1) additional staff S#1 during this visit. LPA took tour of facility and did not observed any health and safety Hazards. On 09/25/2023; LPA conducted a health and safety check and took a tour of the physical plant including the common areas, kitchen, dining room, medications room, and five (5) resident rooms. LPA measured the water temperature, and it was within 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed that there was at least a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods, and a 2-day supply of perishable foods and medications were centrally stored and locked. The facility was clean and in good repair and there were no observable signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. (Continue on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024 · control 28-AS-20230922133247
Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explain the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested copies of staff/resident roster, reviewed resident #1’s file, and requested copies of identification and emergency sheet, physician’s report, admission agreement, notice to pay rent, receipts for payment from January 2023 – February 2024, to the facility. LPA interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation Illegal eviction it is alleged R1 was given an eviction notice on 2/23/24, for lack of rent payment, per complainant R1 has paid the rent in full every month. Interviews conducted with administrator and licensee revealed R1 has not been given an eviction notice yet. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240226102810
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide correct medication. Untrained staff is providing medication to residents. Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff not assisting resident with needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Lydia Pabion, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/28/2023. During the initial and subsequent complaint visits, the investigation consisted of the following: LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility, interviewed Resident #1- Resident #11 (R1- R11) and Staff #1- Staff #7 (S1- S7) altogether. LPA unable to interview Staff #8 (S8) who was not on duty. LPA also attempted to interview Resident #12 (refused to speak to LPA/on Hospice care) and Resident #13 (R13) - Resident #14 (R14) but unsuccessful as they are both non verbal. LPA obtained copies of the Resident and Staff Rosters, reviewed Residents #1-#2 (R1-R2's) file documents such as; Face Sheet, Needs and Services Plan, Physician's Report LIC 602, and Progress notes. Additionally, (5) Staff files, (3) additional Resident filesthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231222091841
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is sleeping at the facility.

*This report supersedes report dated 11/07/2023 due to findings changed for 1 allegation* Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "staff are sleeping at the facility", it is alleged that staff are sleeping at the facility during their shifts. Administrator stated 2 months ago she reviewed her camera footage and noticed a graveyard staff sleeping on job. She confronted the staff and the staff resigned on 09/14/23. Administrator stated this was a one tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231030095916
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has bedbugs. Staff are sleeping at the facility.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "facility has bedbugs", it is alleged that there are bedbugs in rooms 201, 205, 227 and the facility's TV room. Administrator denied the allegation and stated no bedbugs complaints have been brought to her attention. Staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegations. Residents in rooms 201 and 227 denied having bedbugs and resident in room 205 was out in the community and not available for an interview. (the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231030095916
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints14typical 7
State visits on file27typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2003.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020255522024673202344120223412021442
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 799-1141

Is Prospect Manor licensed?

Yes — Prospect Manor is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in South Pasadena (Los Angeles County): California license #197603952, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 99 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Prospect Manor care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Prospect Manor with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 & OVER. APPROVED FOR 99 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 35 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4. BEDRIDDEN CLEARED RMS: 102,104,105,106,107,109,110,115,116,117,118,119,123.

How much does Prospect Manor cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Prospect Manor's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Prospect Manor accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Prospect Manor through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

47 of 99 beds occupied (47%) when the state visited on December 5, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Prospect Manor?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Prospect Manor; 18 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 5, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

18 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provided medical attention to resident as needed. Staff did not follow resident’s care plan
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Jose De Leon and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/5/25 LPA Flores conducted an initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed administrator and nurse and collected the following documents for Resident #1’s (R1) file and requested copies of physician’s report, needs and care plan, identification and emergency sheet, admission agreement, hospital discharge documents, medication sheets, and home health plan. On 8/28/25 LPA Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit and interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. On 9/18/25 LPA Flores contacted Home Health Agency. On 11/24/25 LPA Flores contacted R1 over the phone. On 12/5/25 LPA Flores delivered findings. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250728111411
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
*This report is a corrected version of report dated 8/5/25 to change finding and substantiated one of the allegations and add additional information.* Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Janice Somera and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. On 8/7/25 LPA interviewed South Pasadena Police Department officer. On 8/11/25 LPA Flores interviewed R1's rCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with the administrator, Lydia Pabion. The purpose of the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff roster, resident roster, and documents on Resident #1 (R1). LPA interviewed the administrator, 3 Staff, and 5 Residents. R1 was not available for the interview today. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was found by law enforcement and was in the hospital for dehydration. According to staff interviews, R1 was not in the facility around 7 pm on 8/5/25. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250808152943
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met Lydia Pabion with and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. It is alleged that on 5/7/25, R1 was attacked by roommate resulting in an injury. (CDSS inspection report, August 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident eloping from the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/15/24 LPA conducted and initial complaint investigation visit. During the initial visit LPA requested staff/resident roster, resident #1(R1)’s physician’s report dated: 8/21/23, admission agreement, pre-appraisal, needs and care plan, medication sheet, incident report. LPA interviewed Resident #1-#3(R1-R3) and 5 staff. On 10/18/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) case manager over the phone and obtained documents. On 10/21/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) over the phone. On 10/29/24 LPA Flores delivered findings for the above allegation. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 29, 2024 · control 28-AS-20241011081106
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglected resident's wound in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to continue investigation and deliver findings for the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Lydia Pabion and discussed purpose of visit. LPA interviewed Five (5) residents and one (1) additional staff S#1 during this visit. LPA took tour of facility and did not observed any health and safety Hazards. On 09/25/2023; LPA conducted a health and safety check and took a tour of the physical plant including the common areas, kitchen, dining room, medications room, and five (5) resident rooms. LPA measured the water temperature, and it was within 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed that there was at least a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods, and a 2-day supply of perishable foods and medications were centrally stored and locked. The facility was clean and in good repair and there were no observable signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. (Continue on 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2024 · control 28-AS-20230922133247
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explain the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested copies of staff/resident roster, reviewed resident #1’s file, and requested copies of identification and emergency sheet, physician’s report, admission agreement, notice to pay rent, receipts for payment from January 2023 – February 2024, to the facility. LPA interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation Illegal eviction it is alleged R1 was given an eviction notice on 2/23/24, for lack of rent payment, per complainant R1 has paid the rent in full every month. Interviews conducted with administrator and licensee revealed R1 has not been given an eviction notice yet. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240226102810
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide correct medication. Untrained staff is providing medication to residents. Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff not assisting resident with needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Lydia Pabion, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/28/2023. During the initial and subsequent complaint visits, the investigation consisted of the following: LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility, interviewed Resident #1- Resident #11 (R1- R11) and Staff #1- Staff #7 (S1- S7) altogether. LPA unable to interview Staff #8 (S8) who was not on duty. LPA also attempted to interview Resident #12 (refused to speak to LPA/on Hospice care) and Resident #13 (R13) - Resident #14 (R14) but unsuccessful as they are both non verbal. LPA obtained copies of the Resident and Staff Rosters, reviewed Residents #1-#2 (R1-R2's) file documents such as; Face Sheet, Needs and Services Plan, Physician's Report LIC 602, and Progress notes. Additionally, (5) Staff files, (3) additional Resident filesCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231222091841
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is sleeping at the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
*This report supersedes report dated 11/07/2023 due to findings changed for 1 allegation* Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "staff are sleeping at the facility", it is alleged that staff are sleeping at the facility during their shifts. Administrator stated 2 months ago she reviewed her camera footage and noticed a graveyard staff sleeping on job. She confronted the staff and the staff resigned on 09/14/23. Administrator stated this was a one tCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231030095916

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bedbugs. Staff are sleeping at the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "facility has bedbugs", it is alleged that there are bedbugs in rooms 201, 205, 227 and the facility's TV room. Administrator denied the allegation and stated no bedbugs complaints have been brought to her attention. Staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegations. Residents in rooms 201 and 227 denied having bedbugs and resident in room 205 was out in the community and not available for an interview. (CDSS inspection report, November 7, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231030095916
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was sexually abused while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Flores conducted a subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver findings for LPA Irra who was assigned this complaint. On 07/15/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Spencer conducted a Health and Safety check visit in response to the above personal rights allegation. LPA met with administrator Lydia Pabion. During this visit, LPA Spencer conducted a health and safety check and took a tour of the physical plant including the common areas, kitchen, dining room, medications room, and five (5) resident rooms. The facility was clean and in good repair and there were no observable signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. LPA Spencer obtained a copy of staff roster, resident roster, and for three (3) specified residents: resident face sheet, MAR log, physician's report, and appraisal needs & services plan. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) SubstantiateCDSS inspection report, June 6, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210714145302
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not repairing broken heating system at facility. Facility staff not meeting residents' needs for activities at facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Lydia Pabion Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a copy of resident/staff roster, conducted a tour of facility's resident rooms #103,108,112,117,224,220,211,204, a total of 12 thermostats were observed throughout the facility's hallways next to the following rooms #104,107,111,119,232,227,220,216,212,208,201 all set up and read at 72 degrees F. except for thermostat next to room #107 read at 69 degrees F and set up at 72 degrees F., and thermostat next to room# 232 which was set up at 74 and read at 72 degrees F. Interviewed resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5) and staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4) and #5(S5). LPA Flores reviewed activity calendar for the month of January 2023, S3 duties and responsibilities sheets. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230124121154

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
14
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 799-1141
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Prospect Manor? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.