Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fortuna, Humboldt County, California — state license #126803830, licensed for 92 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 55 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 13, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 92 residents · Fortuna, CA · Humboldt County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #126803830, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2401 Redwood Way · Fortuna, Humboldt County
Phone
(707) 726-0111
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 92 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 5 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 92 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, SEQUOIA FORTUNA LLC, EFFECTIVE 12/31/2024.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 71 times and filed 55 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 13, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 30, 2026
Occupancy at the April 5, 2024 visit
57 of 92 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 5, 2022 to April 5, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (12), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 43 of 55 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 11 documents
Sep 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 18 documents
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left feces soiled linens in the resident's room for over a week. Facility is in disrepair.

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, LPA observed the facility did not ensure laundry is done in a timely manner. LPA reviewed housekeeping records and observed resident laundry is not always completed as agreed to in the admission agreement. LPA observed several occasions where a residents laundry was not completed for more than 2 weeks. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the facility windows are in disrepair. Many resident room windows are not operational. Some do not open correctly or do not close completely. Facility is aware and has a plan to replace the windows in the building but needs to wait for the weather. Continued on LIC9099-C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231229133708
Apr 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident Medication was not administered per regulation

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed, Resident (R1) did not receive medication as ordered. Records show the medication was out of stock, but there was no documentation to show facility followed up. Facility does not have a written procedure to ensure oversight for re-ordering medications. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. This is a repeat violation, civil penalty of $250.00 is being issued. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Thisthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240216124504
Apr 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly trained Facility is not following infection control plan Facility is in disrepair

At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to amend this report to add additional information regarding the above allegations. On 04/05/2024 at approximately 8:30AM, LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on a review of staff training records, facility has documentation of required staff training. LPA observed additional training for special circumstances as well. LPA reviewed facility infection control plan and observed precautions implemented to decrease the risk of infection. Facility was in daily contact with local public health, signs were posted and staff were wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE). LPA toured facility and did not find evidence to support the allegation that facility is in disrepair. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegatiothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240205165146
Mar 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to manage medication as prescribed by physician Staff did not meet residents care needs

At approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the facility failed to manage medication as prescribed by physician. LPA reviewed medication records and found R1 did not receive medications that were prescribed to them on multiple occasions due to the facility being out of stock and not reordering on time or not being able to find the medications. ***This is a repeat violation in a 12 month period, an immediate civil penalty is being issued in the amount of $250.*** LPA reviewed care plans and after visit summaries related to R1. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, facility did not meet residents care needs. Continued on LIC9099-C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 8, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231229133708
Mar 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility mismanages medications Residents care needs are not being met

At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to amend this report to add additional information regarding the above allegations. On 03/08/2024 at approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on a review of records, facility did not reorder medications causing resident to be without needed medication as required. Based on a review of records and interviews conducted, resident care needs were not met, Resident did not receive showering assistance or laundry assistance as outlined in facility care plan and Admission agreement. These allegations are addressed and citations issued in complaint, 21-AS-20231229133708. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 8, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240205165146
Jan 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is incorrectly charging resident for a pet they do not have at the facility.

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on a review of admission agreement and invoices of cost of care, the facility made an error by charging resident an additional sum of money one time. The error was caught and the money was refunded. The facility is not charging resident for the cost of a pet. This agency has investigated the above allegation. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231229133708
Jan 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is not receiving wound care as needed

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on records reviewed, facility did not follow up on physician orders to provide care for residents wound. On 11/22/2023, facility was notified, via telephone, to clean, dry and apply a bandage to residents toe daily. On 11/27/2023, an order was faxed to the facility to provide the requested wound care. There is no documation of follow up after 11/22/2023 to obtain the written order. A review of residents care plan shows an update to provide care on 11/27/2023. The wound grew progressivly worse in that timespan. This lack of care resulted in resident being sent to the hospital due to an infection and surgical procedure. Continued on LIC9099-C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231130145710
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair.

At approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the building and grounds, interviewed staff and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility became aware of several outside lights that were not operational in August of 2023. Executive Director sent a request to multiple companies for repair quotes for repair. Director submitted the received quotes to the corporate office. The lights were repaired in December of 2023. LPA reviewed Resident Council meeting notes and did not observe any reference to a lack of lighting in the Assisted living section of the facility. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240104111022
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20239 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow Power of Attorney of resident. Staff isolates resident in bedroom. Staff is not communicating with resident's responsible party.

At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, Resident, R1, was their own responsible party. R1 signed their own admission agreement and listed themselves as the person to contact. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, facility does not isolate resident in their room. R1 informed the facility that they would like to stay in their room. R1 is ambulatory and is free to move about the facility as they wish. LPA observed the door to R1's room and there was no sign of any locking device that would prevent R1 from leaving their room. Continued on LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231005090206
Dec 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident hitting another resident in care. Facility did not follow reporting requirements Dementia resident had access to lighter

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA received copies of documents. Based on records reviewed, R1 has had several behavioral issues spanning several months. The department investigated a previous complaint, (21-AS-20230706140520) and requested facility to update the care plan for R1. Behaviors continued to occur. LPA reviewed a report submitted by facility on 09/05/2023, which stated R1 would have staff with them anytime R1 was outside of their room. LPA reviewed the current plan of care for R1 and did not observe any notation informing staff to be with R1 while they are out of the room. Continued on LIC9099-C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230907120843
Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. Based on records reviewed, the facility was aware of resident behaviors upon admission. R1 did not exhibit behaviors for the first few months. When behaviors began, facility did not update care plans or change staffing levels to address the behaviors. The eviction notice indicates certain dates of behaviors, but there is no documentation to show the facility took steps to address the behaviors. LPA reviewed incident reports and other documentation and observed there is no evidence the facility notified the residents responsible party to inform them of these incidents. LPA reviewed the eviction notice and found it lacking information regarding the residents right to contest the eviction...Continued on LIC9099-C... Substhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230921111857
Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident unattended in wet clothing for extended periods of time Facility is malodorous Staff failed to meet resident's needs

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigaiton into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA received copies of documents. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, residents are checked for wet clothing before and after every meal and periodically throughout the day. Residents in memory care are checked more often. LPA toured the facility on multiple occasions during the course of this investigation. LPA was informed of a particular room where they are having difficulting keeping the resident from soiling the furniture and themselves. Additional cleanings and clothing changes have been ongoing but the resident is resistant. Facility will continue to address the behavior. Continued on LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230707122711
Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient staffing

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigaiton into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and conducted interviews. LPA reviewed resident care plans and Hospice documentation and found several residents requiring two person assists. LPA reviewed staffing schedules and found certain shifts that did not have proper staffing to meet resident needs. LPA observed memory care only had 1 staff scheduled on certain days. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230706140520
Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to protect resident Staff are not meeting the needs of residents in care Physical Plant – Facility is not clean and is in disrepair

At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigaiton into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA received copies of documents. Based on records reviewed, Facility did not update the care plan for resident, R1, or adjust staffing levels after R1 had numerous incidents of assaulting other residents. The incidents of aggression to other residents have be ongoing for several months. LPA reviewed documentation of staff reporting these events, but there is no documenation of changes made to ensure the safety of other residents. ***This is a repeat violation in a 12 month period. An immediate civil penalty is being issued in the amount of $250.*** Continued on LIC9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230706140520
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations11typical 1
Type B citations13typical 1
Substantiated complaints26typical 2
Total complaints34typical 7
State visits on file71typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202581102024918520231421720225602021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Humboldt County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 726-0111

Is Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community licensed?

Yes — Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fortuna (Humboldt County): California license #126803830, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 92 residents. State records list 55 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 13, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 92 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, SEQUOIA FORTUNA LLC, EFFECTIVE 12/31/2024.

How much does Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Humboldt County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

57 of 92 beds occupied (62%) when the state visited on April 5, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 71 state visits and 55 dated documents since 2021 for Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 5, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left feces soiled linens in the resident's room for over a week. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, LPA observed the facility did not ensure laundry is done in a timely manner. LPA reviewed housekeeping records and observed resident laundry is not always completed as agreed to in the admission agreement. LPA observed several occasions where a residents laundry was not completed for more than 2 weeks. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the facility windows are in disrepair. Many resident room windows are not operational. Some do not open correctly or do not close completely. Facility is aware and has a plan to replace the windows in the building but needs to wait for the weather. Continued on LIC9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231229133708
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident Medication was not administered per regulation
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed, Resident (R1) did not receive medication as ordered. Records show the medication was out of stock, but there was no documentation to show facility followed up. Facility does not have a written procedure to ensure oversight for re-ordering medications. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. This is a repeat violation, civil penalty of $250.00 is being issued. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. ThisCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240216124504
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly trained Facility is not following infection control plan Facility is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to amend this report to add additional information regarding the above allegations. On 04/05/2024 at approximately 8:30AM, LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on a review of staff training records, facility has documentation of required staff training. LPA observed additional training for special circumstances as well. LPA reviewed facility infection control plan and observed precautions implemented to decrease the risk of infection. Facility was in daily contact with local public health, signs were posted and staff were wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE). LPA toured facility and did not find evidence to support the allegation that facility is in disrepair. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegatioCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240205165146
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to manage medication as prescribed by physician Staff did not meet residents care needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the facility failed to manage medication as prescribed by physician. LPA reviewed medication records and found R1 did not receive medications that were prescribed to them on multiple occasions due to the facility being out of stock and not reordering on time or not being able to find the medications. ***This is a repeat violation in a 12 month period, an immediate civil penalty is being issued in the amount of $250.*** LPA reviewed care plans and after visit summaries related to R1. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, facility did not meet residents care needs. Continued on LIC9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 8, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231229133708
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility mismanages medications Residents care needs are not being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to amend this report to add additional information regarding the above allegations. On 03/08/2024 at approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on a review of records, facility did not reorder medications causing resident to be without needed medication as required. Based on a review of records and interviews conducted, resident care needs were not met, Resident did not receive showering assistance or laundry assistance as outlined in facility care plan and Admission agreement. These allegations are addressed and citations issued in complaint, 21-AS-20231229133708. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 8, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240205165146
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is incorrectly charging resident for a pet they do not have at the facility.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on a review of admission agreement and invoices of cost of care, the facility made an error by charging resident an additional sum of money one time. The error was caught and the money was refunded. The facility is not charging resident for the cost of a pet. This agency has investigated the above allegation. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231229133708
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is not receiving wound care as needed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on records reviewed, facility did not follow up on physician orders to provide care for residents wound. On 11/22/2023, facility was notified, via telephone, to clean, dry and apply a bandage to residents toe daily. On 11/27/2023, an order was faxed to the facility to provide the requested wound care. There is no documation of follow up after 11/22/2023 to obtain the written order. A review of residents care plan shows an update to provide care on 11/27/2023. The wound grew progressivly worse in that timespan. This lack of care resulted in resident being sent to the hospital due to an infection and surgical procedure. Continued on LIC9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231130145710
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the building and grounds, interviewed staff and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility became aware of several outside lights that were not operational in August of 2023. Executive Director sent a request to multiple companies for repair quotes for repair. Director submitted the received quotes to the corporate office. The lights were repaired in December of 2023. LPA reviewed Resident Council meeting notes and did not observe any reference to a lack of lighting in the Assisted living section of the facility. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UnsubCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240104111022

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow Power of Attorney of resident. Staff isolates resident in bedroom. Staff is not communicating with resident's responsible party.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, Resident, R1, was their own responsible party. R1 signed their own admission agreement and listed themselves as the person to contact. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, facility does not isolate resident in their room. R1 informed the facility that they would like to stay in their room. R1 is ambulatory and is free to move about the facility as they wish. LPA observed the door to R1's room and there was no sign of any locking device that would prevent R1 from leaving their room. Continued on LIC9099-C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 18, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231005090206
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident hitting another resident in care. Facility did not follow reporting requirements Dementia resident had access to lighter
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA received copies of documents. Based on records reviewed, R1 has had several behavioral issues spanning several months. The department investigated a previous complaint, (21-AS-20230706140520) and requested facility to update the care plan for R1. Behaviors continued to occur. LPA reviewed a report submitted by facility on 09/05/2023, which stated R1 would have staff with them anytime R1 was outside of their room. LPA reviewed the current plan of care for R1 and did not observe any notation informing staff to be with R1 while they are out of the room. Continued on LIC9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230907120843
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. Based on records reviewed, the facility was aware of resident behaviors upon admission. R1 did not exhibit behaviors for the first few months. When behaviors began, facility did not update care plans or change staffing levels to address the behaviors. The eviction notice indicates certain dates of behaviors, but there is no documentation to show the facility took steps to address the behaviors. LPA reviewed incident reports and other documentation and observed there is no evidence the facility notified the residents responsible party to inform them of these incidents. LPA reviewed the eviction notice and found it lacking information regarding the residents right to contest the eviction...Continued on LIC9099-C... SubsCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230921111857
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident unattended in wet clothing for extended periods of time Facility is malodorous Staff failed to meet resident's needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigaiton into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA received copies of documents. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, residents are checked for wet clothing before and after every meal and periodically throughout the day. Residents in memory care are checked more often. LPA toured the facility on multiple occasions during the course of this investigation. LPA was informed of a particular room where they are having difficulting keeping the resident from soiling the furniture and themselves. Additional cleanings and clothing changes have been ongoing but the resident is resistant. Facility will continue to address the behavior. Continued on LIC9099-C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230707122711
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigaiton into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and conducted interviews. LPA reviewed resident care plans and Hospice documentation and found several residents requiring two person assists. LPA reviewed staffing schedules and found certain shifts that did not have proper staffing to meet resident needs. LPA observed memory care only had 1 staff scheduled on certain days. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230706140520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to protect resident Staff are not meeting the needs of residents in care Physical Plant – Facility is not clean and is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigaiton into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, toured the facility, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA received copies of documents. Based on records reviewed, Facility did not update the care plan for resident, R1, or adjust staffing levels after R1 had numerous incidents of assaulting other residents. The incidents of aggression to other residents have be ongoing for several months. LPA reviewed documentation of staff reporting these events, but there is no documenation of changes made to ensure the safety of other residents. ***This is a repeat violation in a 12 month period. An immediate civil penalty is being issued in the amount of $250.*** Continued on LIC9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230706140520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not answer phone after hours
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. During the course of this investigation, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed records regarding the policy of answering the telephone after hours. LPA was informed that in the past, a cordless telephone was accessible to the medication technician to answer the main phone number after hours, but it has not worked in some time. LPA reviewed the resident handbook, provided to new residents upon admission and observed the facility states the main phone number is an option to request assistance if the residents emergency pull cord is not working and the phone will be monitored 24/7 by staff. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. DeCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230131112009
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not meeting the care needs of residents. Facility staff does not serve residents food in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. LPA reviewed call log records from November through February to determine the response time for calls of service for resident, R1. There were 104 calls for service for R1 in this time period. The pendant system works by pendant activation by the resident, then staff acknowledge the call, assist the resident then reset the pendant. The time it took for staff to acknowledge, assist then reset the pendant ranged from 13 minutes to 29 minutes for this timeframe. During the course of this investigation, LPA observed meal times ranging from Breakfast to Dinner. LPA observed residents gather at the tables up to 45 minutes before the scheduled time of the meal. LPA observed the meals to be brought to the tables at the approximate time of the schCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230209160155
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff used alcohol to persuade a resident while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Resident, R1, recently moved into the facility and was having difficulties sharing a room with another person. R1 is under a full conservatorship by their POA and was in communication with the facility managment team to move R1 to a private room. The aggreement was made with R1 and their Conservator in the morning to move rooms after lunch and a nap. The aggrement included a celebration including some alcohol. R1 was provided alcohol, 2 beers and a small amount of whiskey at the request of the Conservator. LPA reviewed records and found a physician order for alcohol for R1. LPA conducted interviews with staff involved with the celebration. Based on those interviews, R1 was not drunk and the alcohol was not used to weaken the resolve of R1CDSS inspection report, April 21, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230407091506
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident eloped from facility. Facility failed to keep the building and grounds safe and sanitary
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff, toured the building and reviewed records. LPA received copies of documents. At approximately 9:15AM, LPA interviewed staff and learned there were no instances of a resident leaving the facility without a staff escort, if required. Based on interviews conducted, there were a few times a resident walked out the front door, but staff were present and accompanied them while away from the building. Resident was with staff at all times while away from the facility grounds. Based on interviews with the Director, the facility suffered some damage from the earthquake on 12/20/2022. Some of the damage was visible and attended to immediately. Recently the facility became aware of a broken sewer pipe under the building. Facility took immediate action once becoming awareCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230221135734
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident room without heat for 2 days Unlawful eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Charmin Bailey, interviewed staff, toured the building and reviewed records. LPA interviewed Business office manager Gage Dupper regarding the aftermath of the earthquake that occurred on 12/20/2022. The facility, along with the entire county, lost electrical power as a result of the earthquake. The facility generator provided emergency power to the facility but does not support the heating system. The Director at the time purchased and rented several portable electric heaters and extra blankets for residents who wanted them. Facility staff conducted 15 minute checks on all residents and provided assistance as needed. LPA reviewed facility documentation regarding evictions. During the Covid pandemic, previous management at the facility made an arrangement with residents to waive the cost of iCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230223102845
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulting in multiple falls
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 08:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Nurse Teresa Oliveri, reviewed records and interviewed staff. LPA received copies of documents. Based on a record review, Resident 1, R1, has been declining in health for several months. Records indicate R1 had several falls from December through the end of January and there were no documented changes to the care plan. LPA found documentation showing an alert status for R1 but no further instruction for staff to follow. LPA was not able to associate the falls with a lack of staff, however, there were no updated services plans or appraisals for staff to follow to ensure residents needs were met. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of RegulaCDSS inspection report, February 10, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230203114826
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident soiled for an extended period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to complete an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Nurse Teresa Oliveri, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, there is no evidence to support the allegation that a resident was left soiled for an extended amount of time. Based on interviews conducted regarding the incident in question, resident requested assistance at approximately 9:30PM. Staff on duty was not able to assist by themselves and needed the assistance of the oncoming staff. Resident was then assisted, and was assisted two more times during the night. Based on interviews conducted with staff regarding other interactions, resident does not have good recall of events. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the alleCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230125093751
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is operating without an Administrator
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 11:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to complete an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Nurse Teresa Oliveri, interviewed staff and reviewed records. The current Administrator of this facility is Pamela Chapman. The day to day running of the facility is shared by Teresa and another nurse, Erin Ortiz. During this visit, LPA was able to speak with Pamela Chapman on the telephone. LPA provided regulation regarding the duties of the Administrator and the duties required of the Administrator. Although the facility has a dedicated Administrator, based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the Administrator is not present at the facility a sufficient number of hours to ensure substantial compliance with regulation. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies areCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230124133301

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not keep residents authorized person informed about resident's care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 9:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Ken Nunes, reviewed records and interviewed staff. Based on interviews conducted, residents were tested for COVID on 12/16/2022, and upon receiving the results of the test, responsible parties were notified. If the responsible party did not answer, a message was left requesting a return call. LPA received documentation regarding COVID positives in the facility. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221219154112
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to meet residents care needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Ken Nunes, reviewed records and interviewed staff. Based on a review of records and interviews conducted, LPA observed the facility did meet the needs of residents in care. Upon observation of the resident causing self harm by removing a catheter, facility staff immediately contacted emergency personnel and resident was taken to the hospital. Hospital staff treated the injury and returned resident to the facility. Resident caused self harm again upon return and was returned to the hospital. This series of events occurred one more time, then a physician removed it. Facility followed physician orders in the care of the resident. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the alCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2022 · control 21-AS-20221102145517
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide assistance to resident in a timely manner. Staff does not follow food menu for residents. Staff not providing adequate food service.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility, unannounced, to deliver findings from the investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Jessica Milich. Based on interviews and records reviewed during the course of this investigation, staff do provide assistance to residents in a timely manner. LPA was informed there was 1 day where a WIFI outage was discovered after approximately 45 minutes, where resident pendants were not being answered. Staff were not aware that the system was down. Upon learning of the outage, staff enacted protocol, which is to provide whistles to pre identified residents and to do rounds every 10-15 minutes. LPA reviewed facility menu's for June and July. Regulation requires weekly menus to be available for residents in advance, but facility may change menu options without notice. Facility is to keep a record of meals served for 30 days. Based on a review of facility menu's, the meal opCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220712084321

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 71 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
13
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
26
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
34
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
71
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 726-0111
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sequoia Springs Senior Living Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.