This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Change of Ownership”, September 27, 2026.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Primavera Gardens

Mid-size home·20 while this license was open·Morgan Hill, California

Closed in state recordLicence #435202754
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Home size20 while this license was openMid-size care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit17 of 20 beds occupiedMay 7, 2025 · not a current opening

Primavera Gardens in Morgan Hill held a license for a mid-size care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 20 residents, first issued in 2020. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Primavera Gardens

Is Primavera Gardens licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Primavera Gardens licensed for?

20 residents while this license was open — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Primavera Gardens been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Primavera Gardens still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

What does Primavera Gardens cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Among 80 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,850 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 80 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Primavera Gardens take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Church Street Assisted Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Primavera Gardens keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Primavera Gardens license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PRIMAVERA GARDENS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202754. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 20 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by Church Street Assisted Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 2, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 20 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 16 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (20) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (16).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 16 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,650a month to start

Likely $3,650–$6,100

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,650a month

Likely $3,650–$6,250

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,650–$6,100

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,250
$4,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,200
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$4,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 16095 Church Street, Morgan Hill, CA 95037Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 2, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
October 2, 2025
Occupied · May 7, 2025 visit
17 of 20 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 22, 2023 to May 7, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints3typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254402024110202324020221102021220

The last 36 months — 6 of 12 documents

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Kabariti arrived unannounced to conduct a case management – incident visit. The purpose of this visit it deliver the final report on a case management that was initiated on 08/25/2025 regarding an elopement that occurred on 08/20/2025. LPA met with Administrator, Lisa Lanford. On 08/21/2025, the Department received a verbal report regarding resident (R1) who eloped from the facility on 08/20/2025. It was reported that R1 was found by a neighbor around the corner of the facility (about 450-500 feet away) around 2:00PM. The neighbor called 911 and when 911 arrived, R1 was observed disoriented and was taken to the hospital where it was found that R1 was diagnosed with an infection. It was stated that R1 did not sustain any injuries during the elopement. Based on interview with staff (S1), around 4:15PM it was reported by another staff (S2) that R1 was missing when they were gathering all the residents for dinner time. Staff immediately went to look for R1 in all the rooms, interior and exterior of the facility but was unable to location him/her. Around 4:25PM, S1 called 911 and reported a missing resident. S1 states that while walking around the neighborhood, the police was driving by and informed S1 that R1 was found after 2:04PM and was found with no injuries. S1 states that R1 was sent to the hospital by the police due to confusion and unable to describe what happened. S1 stated that R1 returned to the facility on the same day. Page 1 of 2. S1 stated to believe that R1 exited through the main entrance which is unlocked and does not alarm during the day. S1 stated that this was the first time this happened with R1, as R1 does not have any history of elopement. S1 denied any other residents having a history of elopement. LPA observed that there are cameras throughout the common areas. S1 stated to have went through all the camera footage and did not find footage of R1 leaving the facility. Based on record review, R1 diagnosed with a neurocognitive disorder and is not able to leave the facility unassisted. After the incident, the Administrator updated R1's appraisal/needs and services plan to include the change of behaviors after the elopement. The Administrator also provided staff with an in-service training on topics of elopement and behavior management. Going forward, the Administrator will always have a staff standing in the common areas which is facing the main entrance to supervise the residents and main entrance. Administrator states the main entrance door will continue to be unlocked and not alarmed because they have many visitors throughout the day going in and out of the facility. The Administrator states future plans to install an electric gate that will require a code to enter. Based on the facility's compliance history, the facility does not have any reported history of resident's eloping. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A technical violation was provided per Title 22 Section 87219(i). This report was reviewed with Administrator, Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
Sep 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Kabariti arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Lisa Lanford. The facility is currently undergoing a change of ownership and the new owner has submitted an application to the Department which is currently pending. All residents, family and staff were made aware of the upcoming change. During visit, LPA toured the facility with ADM to include all resident bedrooms, bathrooms, shower room, staff lounge, dining room, living room, kitchen, and laundry room. Facility temperature maintained at 70 degrees F. Emergency exit doors observed with door alarms. 1 out of 3 of the door alarms which was next to bedroom #1 observed not operable. During visit, the maintenance personnel replaced the battery of the door alarm in which LPA observed the door alarm was operable. Fire extinguisher last serviced on 10/24/2024. Facility equipped with carbon monoxide detectors in the kitchen and hallways. All resident bedrooms equipped with beds, linens, night stands, dressers, lidded trash bins, and adequate lighting. Residents whose beds are equipped with half rails has a physician order on file for the use of half rails. Page 1 of 3. LPA measured the hot water temperature in bedroom #1. LPA observed the sink in bedroom #1 was not properly draining causing the sink to be clogged. The maintenance personnel fixed the sink drainage during visit. The hot water temperature was measured at 119 degrees F. The hot water temperature in bedroom #9 measured at 133.7 degrees F. Hot water temperature in bedroom #10 measured at 126.5 degrees F. During visit, the maintenance personnel attempted to lower the hot water temperature but then states the knob to adjust the water temperature is broken. The maintenance personnel states to have called a plumber in which the plumber is scheduled to come to the facility the morning of 09/18/2025. In the meantime, the ADM states a plan to measure the hot water temperature in all bathroom sinks and shower room and place caution signs next to the sinks whose hot water temperature exceeds more than 120 degrees F, while the facility is waiting to lower the hot water temperature. A Type A deficiency is being cited today per Title 22 Section 87303(e)(2) for the hot water temperature exceeding more than 120 degrees F in bedroom #9 and #10. LPA toured the kitchen area. LPA observed a perishable food supply of at least 2 days and a nonperishable food supply of 7 days. Toxins and chemicals are stored separately from the food supply. LPA observed the pilot light of the gas stove is left continuously on. ADM states the brand of the stove is designed to have the pilot light left of on continuously. LPA advised of safety concerns as there were plastic seasoning containers above the stove where the pilot light was on. ADM stated understanding. During visit, the maintenance personnel placed a carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen area. Refrigerator temperatures maintained at 36 degrees F. Freezer temperature maintained at 0 degrees F. LPA toured the resident dining area. LPA observed a wooden plank in the track of the sliding glass door obstructing the sliding glass door in the dining room. The sliding door leads out to front of facility. A Type A deficiency is being cited today per Title 22 Section 87307(d)(6) wherein the sliding door track in the dining room which leads to the front of the facility was obstructed by a wooden plank which did not allow the sliding door to open freely. Page 2 of 3. 5 residents records were reviewed. 5 out of 5 resident records observed complete and up-to-date. ADM states the needs and services plans are verbally reviewed with the resident and families however the new forms that were developed are not being signed. ADM states a plan to revise the needs and services plan to include a signature portion as acknowledgement that the plan was reviewed and agreed upon. 5 residents centrally stored medications and records were reviewed and no issues were noted. 3 staff files were reviewed and the staff files were complete to include a 1st aid certification, health screening, TB result, personnel record and staff training. Emergency drills are completed quarterly and the last drill was completed on 09/07/2025. Documents were requested to update the facility file to include by 09/24/2025: Lease agreement, LIC308, liability insurance, LIC500, administrator certificates, and surety bond (if applicable). Licensee was informed that the annual licensing fee has not been paid as of 09/17/2025. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. This report was reviewed with ADM Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided. Page 3 of 3.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025
Aug 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management-Incident visit regarding an elopement that occurred on 8/20/2025. LPA met with Resident Care Supervisor (RCS) Lisa Lanford and stated the purpose of the visit. On 8/21/2025 RCS called the Department and spoke with LPA Christine Kabariti to report the elopement of Resident R1 on 8/20/2025. RCS stated R1 was located outside of the facility on 8/20/2025. RCS stated R1 returned back to the facility that same day and did not sustain injuries during this incident. RCS stated the facility has not submitted an LIC624 Unusual Incident Report/Injury Report and the SOC341 to the Department as of 8/25/2025. LPA requested RCS to submit the LIC624 and SOC341 to the Department on or before 8/27/2025. LPA interviewed 3 staff and toured 1 resident room. LPA requested pertinent documentation to include but not limited to physician's reports, service plans, and resident emergency contacts. LPA determined this case management needs further investigation. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with RCS Lisa Lanford and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025
May 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are physically abusing resident while in care Staff are not serving resident food quantity necessary to meet their nutritional needs Staff not ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry Facility staff are not competent to provide the services necessary to meet the residents need Facility is not administering medication per doctor's order

On 05/07/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with Medtech Rachel Pearce and explained the purpose of today's visit. Administrator is not present on this day. During the investigation, LPAs conducted interviews, collected and reviewed pertinent documents, and made observations. As a result of the investigation, LPAs could not prove or disporve these allegations took place. Documentation, observations, and interviews are contrary to what the allegations state. These allegations are unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2025 · control 26-AS-20241001103255
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marcella Tarin and Christine Dolores conducted a required unannounced 1 year visit and met with Resident Care Supervisor (RCS), Lisa Lanford. During the visit LPAs toured the facility inside and out. LPAs toured the kitchen area. LPAs observed a perishable food supply of at least 2 days and a nonperishable food supply of 7 days. Refrigerator temperatures maintained at 35 degrees F. Freezer temperature maintained at -6 degrees F. LPAs toured the resident dining area. LPAs observed a wooden plank in the track of the sliding glass door obstructing the sliding glass door in the dining room. Sliding door leads out to front of facility. Licensee was advised to ensure all exit passageways are free and clear of obstruction. Licensee was advised to remove wooden plank in the track of the sliding glass door due to fire safety hazard. LPAs toured 6 resident rooms. LPAs observed 5 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) to have half-bed rails. LPAs observed Rooms 1, 2, 4 and 5 had half-bed rails, and Room 2 had full bed rails. RCS obtained orders for 3 resident's half-rails. LPAs observed the physician's order for the full-bed rails. LPAs recorded bathroom water temperature 120 degrees F in all resident bathrooms. LPAs observed all resident bathrooms had functioning lights and available soap and paper towels. LPAs observed each resident room had available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPAs tested the carbon monoxide detector to be functioning properly. The fire extinguisher last serviced on 7/26/2024. LPAs reviewed 5 resident Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). 5 out of 5 reviewed CSMDR were complete during visit. LPAs reviewed 5 out of 5 resident records to be complete. LPAs were unable to review fire drill logs. RCS states she believes the emergency drills are locked in the office, which RCS is unable to access. See LIC809C. LPAs observed 2 out of 5 staff files are missing health screening and TB result. RCS states files may be locked in the front office which RCS is unable to access. LPAs advised that all personnel files should be available to Licensing agency for reviewing. LPAs were unable to review the administrators file. RCS states the file is locked in the front office, which RCS is unable to access. 5 out of 5 staff obtained fingerprint clearance. 1 out 5 staff have First Aid certification. Annual staff training records were reviewed. Documents were requested to update the facility file: liability insurance, administrator certification. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 see LIC809D. This report was reviewed with RCS Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to conduct a case management – deficiencies visit. LPA met with Resident Care Supervisor, Lisa Lanford. During visit, the facility had 4 staff members working who are all fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. On 09/29/2023, the Department received two letters from the facility requesting a Criminal Record Exemption for staff (S1) and (S2). Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano called and spoke with staff (S3) who states S1 had started working in the facility on-call for the past 6 months. The review of records shows S1’s criminal background clearance was pending, therefore, S1 was not fingerprint cleared to be working facilities. Based on interview, S1 is no longer employed at the facility. S3 states, S1 was hired in February 2023 and worked at least once to twice a week. On 09/29/2023, S1 was immediately released from work for not obtaining a fingerprint clearance from the Department. LPA obtained S1's Guardian information, hire date, and facility's LIC500 via email from S3. A deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC 809-D. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $500 ($100 per day x 5 days = $500), for staff (S1) working at the facility without fingerprint clearance. Please see LIC-421BG. This report was reviewed with Resident Care Supervisor, Lisa Lanford and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 13, 2023

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review and observation the licensee did not ensure staff (S1) received a fingerprint clearance from the Department pior to starting work which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee immediately released S1 from work. Licensee will review section 87355 and submit a statement of understanding to LPA Dolores via email by POC due date.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in Santa Clara County near this one, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County