Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Mountain View Cottages - IVLicense #198204376 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareMountain View Cottages - IVLicense #198204376 · 21027 West Covina Blvd., Covina, CA · (626) 966-4842Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Covina/Mountain View Cottages - IV
Map · 21027 West Covina Blvd.

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,300/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (626) 966-4842

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

MV

Call Mountain View Cottages - IV

Covina · Licensed for 6

(626) 966-4842

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Covina

Mountain View Cottages - IV

21027 West Covina Blvd., Covina, CA 91724 · Licensed since 2004

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Mountain View Cottages - IV

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,300 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 4 residents

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGE 60 AND ABOVE. MAY RETAIN FOUR HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Mountain View Cottages - IV: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,300

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,300likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,500–$5,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$8,700
$6,800
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,295 to $7,000

$2,295$7,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,600–$6,950.

  • Family HomeSan Dimas · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at GlendoraGlendora · 2.2 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,102Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Bentits Retirement VillaSan Dimas · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • San Dimas Adventist Home CareSan Dimas · 2.7 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Faithful Home of CovinaCovina · 4.0 mi · Small home
    $2,295Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Genesis Manor IVLa Verne · 4.4 mi · Small home
    $4,750Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
  • Vine ResidenceWest Covina · 5.0 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Inspired Elderly Care LivingWest Covina · 5.0 mi · Small home
    $4,650Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

21027 West Covina Blvd., Covina, CA 91724Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1San Dimas Community HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #198204376 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

Aug 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care. Physical plant is in disrepair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Staff, Elly Norsati. The purpose of the visit was explained. Administrator Jas Singh was informed of the visit via telephone. LPA toured the facility and interviewed two (2) staff and three (3) residents. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation – Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care. It is alleged that the house thermometer read at 97 degrees F on 8/1/26. LPA interviewed staff and residents regarding this allegation. Staff stated that there is a window air conditioner in each resident room but no central air conditioning. Staff stated that the residents appear comfortable with the indoor temperature. The house thermostat read at 90 degrees F during the visit today. Substantiated LPA interviewed three (3) residents, and they stated they are okay with the temperature in the house. However, a resident (Resident #1 - R1) was transported to the hospital earlier this month and was diagnosed with dehydration. LPA was unable to interview R1 as the resident is non-verbal. Staff stated that they cannot tell if R1 was comfortable or not since the resident is unable to express their needs. Based on information obtained, this allegation is substantiated. Allegation - Physical plant is in disrepair. It is alleged that the air conditioner is not working. LPA interviewed staff who acknowledged that the air conditioner in one of the residents’ rooms is not working. Two (2) out of the three (3) residents interviewed stated the air conditioners in their rooms work. LPA tested the wall air conditioner units in the three resident rooms, and (2) were not working properly. One did not turn on, and the other was not blowing out cool air. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. Based on LPA observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260803153029

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 8, 2026

87303 Maintenance and Operation(b) A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained...(2)The facility shall cool rooms to a comfortable range, between 78 degrees F (26 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C)... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, the faciity's indoor was measured at 90 degrees F and resident went to the hospital for dehydration which posed a immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure the facility temperature is at a comfortable range, between 78 and 85 degrees F. A plan to ensure the temperature will stay in the range shall be submitted to LPA by 8/8/26.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 14, 2026

87303 Maintenance and Operation(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, 2 out of the 3 resident rooms do not have air conditioners properly working which poses a potential health and safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure that all air conditioning units in the facility are working properly. The licensee shall submit proof of installation of new air conditioners or air conditioners in working order by POC due date 8/14/26.

20251 state visit · 1 document

Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted an unannounced Annual Required 1-year visit. Staff person Fiviyanti Lo allowed entry into facility. LPA was met by Administrator Jasbindar Singh and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve six (6) non ambulatory residents over the age of 60 and has an approved hospice waiver for four (4). Currently one(1) resident is under hospice. The visit consisted of the completion of CARE tool, interviews of staff/residents, conduct of physical plant, and reviews of food supply/ medications/ facility records. Physical Plant: The facility is a single-story dwelling located on a main street with three (3) resident bedrooms, two (2) staff bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, living room, front yard, backyard, and attached garage. Front yard was clean and well maintained. LPA Vaid observed sufficient 2 days of perishables and 7-day supply on non-perishables. LPA Vaid observed knives and sharps located in kitchen cabinet, to be inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen sink water temperature was measured at 114.2 degrees F. Kitchen appliances were observed to be clean and in working order. Dining room was observed to be clean and contained one table with plenty of seating. Living room was observed to have plenty of seating and lighting. Interior temperature measured at 78 degree F. Backyard was clean and well maintained. Plenty of shade and seating was observed. Linen Closet: Contained plenty linens, towels, and hygiene products. Resident Rooms : LPA Vaid inspected three (3) resident bedrooms and observed all bedrooms to contain required furnishings, lighting, and linens. CONTINUED ON PAGE 809C.......... Bathrooms: Water temperature in both resident bathrooms were within 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed grab bars and shower chair and non skid mats. Emergency Drills: Last documented drill was conducted on 10/08/2025 at 2 pm. Carbon Monoxide Detectors/Fire Alarm/Fire Extinguisher & Emergency Disaster Plan: LPA observed carbon monoxide in hallways and smoke detectors were observed to be operable. Resident /Staff Files: Four (4) resident files were reviewed. LPA Vaid reviewed staff files for three (3) staff. Personnel records are maintained at facility. Liability Insurance & Infection Control Plan: Facility has current liability insurance on file. LPA Vaid observed updated infection control plan. Laundry Room: LPA Vaid observed laundry room operational and clean, toxins are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. No deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted. This report is discussed and provided to facility Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Nov 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPA met Jasbindar Singh, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility has a capacity of six (6) to serve residents from age 60 and above which may have six (6) non-ambulatory and approved for four (4) hospice waiver. One (1) resident is on hospice. Annual fee is current. Administrator certificate is current with expiration date on 4/11/25 The visit consisted of the completion of CARE tool, interviews of staff/residents, conduct of physical plant, and reviews of food supply/ medications/ facility records. This facility is a single story house located in a residential neighborhood in Covina. The facility consisted of five (5) bedrooms which including three (3) resident bedrooms and two (2) staff bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, office, living room, dining room, kitchen, and back yard. Kitchen was clean and had maintained the required two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non- perishable. Each resident's bedrooms were furnished with required furniture. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supply were observed. Bathrooms inspected and were clean, operable, with the required grab bars and non-skid materials in the shower. Hot water temperature was measured at 106.9 degrees Fahrenheit which was within Title 22 Regulation guidelines. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supplies were observed. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were operable. Fire extinguishers were fully charged and last service was on 02/20/24. Fire drill was conducted on 11/19/24. Auditory devices were operable. Medication is centrally stored and current. Resident records were stored in a locked storage room and inaccessible to residents. Facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit for residents. No deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted. This report is discussed and provided to facility Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024
Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An Informal Conference meeting was held at the Monterey Park Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. Present during this meeting were Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Fernando Fierros, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bonnie Tao, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tyler Reyes and from MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES were Licensee Smita Sanghvit, administrator Trupti Mody, administrator Laura Hernandez, and administrator Jasbindar Singh. The following items listed below were discussed during today's meeting: · Complaint investigation findings for complaint # 28-AS-20210128160641. · Adequate staffing and appropriate care and supervision for residents in care. · Obtaining timely medical care or treatment for residents in care. · Criminal Record Clearance and Associating staff. · Maintenance and Operation: Facility shall be kept clean and in good repair. The facility free from pest. · Immediate Civil Penalties The following Title 22 topics were discussed and a copy of the Section given during office meeting: · Personnel Requirements – General Section 87411 · Maintenance and Operation Section 87303 · Storage Space Section 87309 · Care of Persons with Dementia Section 87705 · Criminal Record Clearance Section 87355 (-continued in LIC 809C-) Licensee was requested to provide procedure plan regarding staff obtaining timely medical care/ treatment for residents by due date 2/21/24. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee and Administrators, and a copy of this licensing report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident suffered a fall resulting in a fracture. Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Maldonado conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Maldonado met with Administrator, Jasbindar Singh, and explained the purpose for the visit. On 01/29/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted the initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. Due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and to implement mitigation measures, the complaint investigation was conducted via tele-conference with Administrator, Jasbindar Singh. During the virtual visit, LPA Tao conducted a health and safety check and requested a copy of the Staff and Resident roster. LPA Tao virtually toured the facility via Facetime with Administrator and observed that the facility is clean and in good repair. LPA observed nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days. LPA Tao observed wash basins, showers/bathtubs and toilets were operable and did not observe any immediate health and safety concerns. (Report Continued on LIC9099-C...) Substantiated The investigation of the above-mentioned allegations was conducted by the licensing agency's Investigation Bureau. The investigation was conducted by the assigned Investigator, Dennis Seng and consisted of the following: Interviews conducted with Administrator (S1) and Staff #2 - #3 (S2 & S3), Residents #1 - #4 (R1, R2, R3 & R4), Witnesses #1 & #2 (W1 & W2), and Staff at other agencies (W3 & W4), including Adult Protective Services and Long-Term Care Ombudsman program. Investigator Seng also reviewed R1's facility file/documentation, including incident reports dated 10/23/20, and medical records dated 11/03/20 and 11/06/20. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident suffered a fall resulting in a fracture. It was alleged that R1, who was deemed a fall risk, fell over a raised threshold in the doorway while ambulating, due to staff failing to assist R1. Interviews with (4) of (4) staff indicated that R1 fell in the facility and that R1’s family did not want the facility staff to call 911. (3) of (4) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegations. Per incident report dated 10/23/20, it was indicated that R1 had a fall at the facility, was helped back into bed, and responsible parties were notified. Interviews with W1-W2 revealed that on 10/23/20, R1 called W1-W2 regarding the fall and stated to be in pain and asked to go to the hospital. However, facility staff informed W1-W2 that staff were unable to arrange R1’s transportation. Interviews with W3-W4 revealed that R1 fell in the facility on 10/23/20 and was not seen by a medical professional until early November 2020. Review of R1's file revealed that R1 was a fall risk as indicated on R1’s Individual Service Plan, dated 09/17/20. Therefore, based on the investigation, the facility failed to provide resident with adequate care and supervision, which resulted in R1 falling and sustaining an injury. Regarding Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. It was alleged that after R1 fell at the facility while being a fall risk, R1 expressed pain to staff and requested an x-ray be taken; However, staff did not obtain medical treatment for the resident until a week later. During the investigation, Investigator Seng reviewed R1’s facility file/documentation, including incident reports dated 10/23/20, and medical reports dated 11/03/20 and 11/06/20. Per the incident report dated 10/23/20, R1 fell over a raised threshold in doorway at the facility while walking into R1’s room. R1 informed S3-S4 that R1 was in pain and wanted to go to the hospital to get an x-ray. Administrator and staff spoke with W1-W2, and per Administrator, W1 and W2 requested R1 not be sent out for medical treatment. Per medical records review, it was discovered that R1 did not receive medical treatment until 11/03/20, which was (11) days after the fall occurred 10/23/20. X-rays taken on 11/06/20 revealed that R1 sustained a fracture to the right hand. Therefore, based on the investigation, staff failed to seek timely medical attention for R1, after R1 fell at the facility and expressed pain to staff, which resulted in a fracture to R1's right hand. (Report continued on LIC9099-C...) Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be Substantiated. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8, deficiencies will be cited on the attached LIC9099-D. An immediate $500 civil penalty is being issued during today's visit due to the lack of care and supervision that occurred on 10/23/20 when R1 fell in the facility and sustained a fractured right hand. “The licensee was informed that a civil penalty might be assessed based on the Health & Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), or 1568.0822(e) or (f).“ An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, along with appeal rights, were discussed and provided to Administrator, Jasbindar Singh. During today's visit, LPA Maldonado obtained a copy of the resident and staff rosters, Facesheet and Physician's Reports for Residents# 2, and #5-7 (R2, and R5-R7), and conducted a tour of the physical plant with assistance of Administrator Singh. Interviews were also conducted with Staff# 1 and #4 (S1 and S4), and attempted interviews with R2, and R5-R7. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility is in disrepair. It was alleged that during the winter months of 2020, the facility heater was in disrepair for one month and delays in plumbing issues on a single toilet shared by (5) residents. Per interviews with staff, S1 stated that although the central heating system was not operating properly for a short period of time, individual heater units were brought in the home and each resident had one placed in their room. S1 also stated that although they did have a plumbing issue on Thanksgiving Day of 2020 in one restroom, the residents were able to use the other restroom in the home, as needed. S4 states no work receipt is available, but recalls the incident and stated that a plumber came the following day to repair it, as it was difficult to have anyone come out on Thanksgiving Day. S4 could not corroborate the allegation as S4 states to not have worked at the facility at the time of the alleged. (4) of (4) residents could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour of the physical plant, LPA observed the thermostat temperature set at 82*F inside the home. LPA observed all resident rooms and common areas to have heat vents, and observed them to be operating properly. LPA also inspected the (2) bathrooms in the home and observed them to be clean, sanitary, and were operable during the visit. Regarding allegation: Staff did not provide an adequate amount of food to resident. It was alleged that R1 did not receive enough food during meals and was given (4) yogurts for Thanksgiving dinner. (2) of (2) staff interviewed denied the allegations and stated that there is always sufficient amount of food/groceries available at the facility for residents. Staff stated that residents are provided with (3) meals and (3) snacks of their choice every day. (1) of (4) residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that sufficient food is given during meals and snacks are always available. LPA attempted interviews with (3) of (4) residents- they could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour of the physical plant, LPA inspected the food supplies and observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foods available for the number of residents in care, which included milk, eggs, vegetables, meats, cereals, cookies, oatmeal, pudding cups, and fresh fruits. (Report continued on LIC9099-C...) Regarding allegation: Resident was denied food. It was alleged that facility staff denied R1 more food, after not receiving enough food to satisfy R1's hunger. (2) of (2) staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that there is always sufficient food at the facility to give to residents if they wish to have more. Staff also stated that the residents are allowed to take whatever they wish at any time from the kitchen or pantry. They may sometimes request it directly from staff and staff will assist the residents with it. Staff stated that residents are provided with (3) meals and (3) snacks of their choice, per day. (1) of (4) residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that all residents are given whatever amount of food they want. LPA attempted interviews with (3) of (4) residents- they could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour of the physical plant, LPA inspected the food supplies and observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foods available for the number of residents in care, which included milk, eggs, vegetables, meats, cereals, cookies, oatmeal, pudding cups, and fresh fruits. LPA did not observe any food items hidden, locked, or inaccessible to residents in care. Based on the LPA's record review, interviews, and observations, the investigation revealed: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Jasbindar Singh, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210128160641

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 13, 2023

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, facility staff failed to provide necessary supervision for (1) of (4) residents who fell at the facility and resulted in a fractured hand, which poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a plan in writing on how facility staff will ensure to meet the needs of all residents including proper care and supervision, per their Individual Needs and Services Plans. Written plan to be submitted to LPA via email by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2023

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g)The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, facility staff failed to seek timely medical attention for (1) of (4) residents, after falling in the facility and sustaining a fracture to the right hand, which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will conduct in-service training for all facilty staff on obtaining proper medical care for residents as needed/required. Copy of training material and sign-in sheet to be sent to LPA via email by POC due date.

Nov 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced Annual Required 1-year Visit on 11/26//2023. LPA was met by Administrator Jasbindar Singh and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve six (6) non ambulatory residents over the age of 60 and has an approved hospice waiver for four (4). LPA OBSERVATIONS: The facility is a single-story dwelling located on a main street with three (3) resident bedrooms, two (2) staff bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, living room, front yard, backyard, and attached garage. Front Yard: Was clean and well maintained. LPA Ramirez observed gate that leads to backyard to be wide open. Kitchen: LPA Ramirez observed sufficient 2 days of perishables and 7-day supply on non-perishables. LPA Ramirez observed knives and sharps located in kitchen cabinet, to be inaccessible to four (4) out of four (4) residents in care. LPA Ramirez observed several bottles of cleaning solutions and disinfectants located nearby kitchen hallway cabinet, to be accessible to four (4) out of four (4) residents in care. LPA Ramirez observed a sign posted on cabinet door indicating to “lock cupboards at all times”, a pad lock was observed but not secured. Kitchen sink water temperature was measured at 114.2 degrees F. Kitchen appliances were observed to be clean and in working order. Two cabinet doors located by sink were in disrepair. Cabinet drawer containing paper items was loose and not opening correctly to its original design. LPA could see exposed nails. Upper cabinet door containing resident plates, cups and other dishware, was missing doorknob. Dining Room/Living room/: Dining room was observed to be clean and contained one table with plenty of seating. Living room was observed to have plenty of seating and lighting. Nearby thermostat was observed to read 78 degree F. Linen Closet: Contained plenty linens, towels, and hygiene products. SEE 809-C Resident Rooms 1 - 3: LPA Ramirez inspected three (3) resident bedrooms and observed all bedrooms to contain required furnishings, lighting, and linens. Auditory device located on resident#2 exit door that leads to back yard, was observed to be in “Off” position. Administrator Singh placed device in “On” position after LPA Ramirez expressed concern. Bathrooms: Water temperature in both resident bathrooms were within 105- 120 degrees F. Bathroom #2 located near laundry room was observed to have 6 x 6 gap in flooring. LPA touched flooring and wood felt soft and wet. LPA Ramirez observed wall near outside shower tile to be stain with brownish-yellow stains, dry wall was peeling and cracking on both sides. Backyard: Was clean and well maintained. Plenty of shade and seating was observed. LPA Ramirez observed back yard gate to be wide open. Emergency Drills: Last documented drill was conducted on 11/11/23 at 3 pm. Carbon Monoxide Detectors/Fire Alarm/Fire Extinguisher & Emergency Disaster Plan: LPA observed carbon monoxide in hallways and smoke detectors were observed to be operable. Personnel Records: Personnel records are maintained at facility. LPA Ramirez reviewed staff files for three (3) staff. Resident Files: Four (4) resident files were reviewed. Liability Insurance & Infection Control Plan: Facility has current liability insurance on file. LPA Ramirez observed updated infection control plan. Laundry Room: LPA Ramirez observed laundry room door to be wide open and access to bleach and laundry soap were observed. LPA Ramirez observed two (2) back doors near laundry room, to have auditory devices switched in “OFF” position and doors were observed to be wide open. Deficiencies are being cited and a copy of this report, 809-D and appeals rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

May 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility hired uncleared adults to work in the facility. Staff are not ensuring that facility is free from pests.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted unannounced complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. During today’s visit, LPA met with Staff#2 upon arrival at the facility. Administrator, Jasbindar Singh joined the visit later in the afternoon. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit regarding the above-mentioned allegations. The investigation consisted of the following: interviews of staff from Staff #1 (S1) through Staff #3 (S3); interviews of residents from resident#1 (R1) through resident #3 (R3); attempted to interview resident#4 (R4) and family member of a former resident; reviewed facility records, and a facility tour. LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, facility files and documents with relevant information. The investigation revealed the following: In regard of the allegation, “facility hired uncleared adults to work in the facility,” it was alleged that facility hired adults who had not been fingerprint cleared and associated with the facility. (-continued in LIC 9099 C-) Substantiated Three (3) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated could not corroborate the allegation. One resident declined to be interviewed. Two (2) out of three (3) staff interviewed denied the allegation. Administrator explained there was no uncleared or undocumented adults working in the facility but there was one unassociated staff. Per record review, Staff#2, who is cleared, but has not been associated with the facility is working there. Therefore, the investigation revealed that facility had an un-associated staff working in the facility. In regard of the allegation, “staff are not ensuring that facility is free from pests,” it was alleged facility had cockroaches. Two (2) out of three (3) residents interviewed revealed they saw live cockroaches in their room in the facility. All three (3) staff interviewed stated the facility had cockroaches. Per facility tour, LPA observed live cockroaches in the kitchen and dead cockroaches in residents’ rooms. Administrator explained facility had pest control services for cockroaches on 4/14/23 and additional pest control services were scheduled until pest issue cleared. Therefore, the facility has pests’ issue. Based on review of documents and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above two allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 1. See LIC 9099D. An immediate civil penalty was cited for having un-associated staff working in the facility. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A hard copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. Three (3) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated could not corroborate the allegation. One resident declined to be interviewed. All three (3) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Per file review, facility had weekly food menu and posted at the kitchen. Residents interviews revealed that staff followed food menu and provide various of food. All three (3) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. LPA tour the kitchen, a food menu was posted in the kitchen and refrigerator had 2 days of perishable food supplies with variety. LPA observed residents during dinner time, residents got 2 serves of fruit, 8 oz of meat, 2 serves of vegetable and 1.5 cup of pasta on their plates. Therefore, there is not preponderance evidence to prove the facility failed to provide general food services. In regard of the allegation, “staff yell at resident(s) in care, it was alleged that staff#2 (S2) yelled at residents. Three (3) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated could not corroborate the allegation. One resident declined to be interviewed. Residents interviewed reveal that staff did not yell at residents. All three (3) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed facility had a policy and in service training to ensure residents’ right and being treat with respect. Therefore, there is not preponderance evidence to prove staff yell at residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A hard copy of the reports were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230510153821

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 20, 2023

Criminal Record Clearance. ... prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1)Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Facility was unable to provide evidence that a criminal record transfer was requested for staff Yoseph Husada. Staff#2. Based on observation and file review, it poses/posed a immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2023

Plan of correction: The facility will ensure that a criminal record clearance/exemption of all staff had been transferred and associated to the facility prior to working or being present at the facility. Administrator would submit evidence to Licensing that a criminal record clearance transfer and association of staff Yoseph Husada by POC due date on 5/20/23.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 16, 2023

The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPA observed cockroaches in the kitchen cabinets; which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to hire a pest control company to evaluate insects/pest issues and will hire a pest control company for pest control treatment. Administrator would submit proof of pest control service invoice by POC due date.

Feb 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with respect and dignity. Staff do not follow food menu. Staff mismanaged resident's medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegations listed above today. During today’s visit, LPA met Administrator, Jasbindar Singh. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit regarding the above-mentioned allegations. Investigation consisted of the following: interviews of staff from Staff #1 (S1) through Staff #2 (S2); interviews of residents from resident#1 (R1) through resident #3 (R3); reviewed resident#1’s record reviews, and a facility tour. LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, resident#1’s files and documents with relevant information. In regard of the allegation, “staff did not treat resident with respect and dignity, it was alleged that staff yell at resident#1, threaten resident#1 and did not treat resident#1 with respect. (-continued in LIC 9099 C-) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: All three (3) residents who were interviewed revealed staff treated residents with respect and dignity. All two (2) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed facility had a policy and in service training to ensure residents’ right and being treat with respect. Therefore, staff treat residents with respect and dignity at the facility. In regard of the allegation, “staff do not follow food menu,” it was alleged that facility did not allow food menu to provide meal to residents. The investigation revealed the following: All three (3) residents who were interviewed revealed staff follow food menu to provide food to residents. Per file review, facility had bi-weekly food menu and posted in the kitchen. Three (3) residents interviewed revealed that staff followed food menu and provide various of food. All two (2) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. LPA tour the kitchen, LPA observed food menu posted in the kitchen and refrigerator had more than two (2) days of perishable food supplies with variety. Therefore, there is not preponderance evidence to prove the facility failed to follow food menu. In regard of the allegation, “staff mismanaged resident's medication,” it was alleged that facility staff failed to administer resident#1’s medication on 1/31/23. The investigation revealed the following: All three (3) residents who were interviewed revealed staff administer residents' medication properly. All two (2) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. LPA reviewed residents’ medication records and did not observe any missing medication. Therefore, there is not preponderance evidence to prove the facility staff mismanaged resident's medication. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230202090838

20221 state visit · 1 document

Nov 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPA met Jasbindar Singh, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility has a capacity of six (6) to serve residents from age 60 and above which may have six (6) non-ambulatory and approved for four (4) hospice waiver. Two (2) residents are on hospice. Annual fee is current. The visit consisted of: the infection control domain tool was used, interviews were conducted, a tour of the facility was conducted, food supply was reviewed, and medications were reviewed. This facility is a single story house located in a residential neighborhood in Covina. The facility consisted of five (5) bedrooms which including three (3) resident bedrooms and two (2) staff bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, office, living room, dining room, kitchen, and back yard. The kitchen was clean and has maintained the required two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non- perishable. Each resident's bedroom had a dresser, chair and closet space available. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supply were observed. Bathrooms inspected and were clean, operable, with the required grab bars and non-skid materials in the shower. Hot water temperature was measured at 114.9 degrees Fahrenheit which was within Title 22 Regulation guidelines. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supplies were observed. (-continued in LIC 809 C-) Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were operable. Fire extinguishers were fully charged and last service was on 10/20/22. Auditory devices were operable. Fire drill was conducted on 9/29/22. Administrator certificate had an expiration date on 4/11/2023. The first aid kit was fully stocked. Mandated documents and signages were posted in common areas. The outdoor activity area had a shaded patio with ample seating. Medication is centrally stored and current. Resident records were stored in a locked storage room and inaccessible to residents. There are no pools and bodies of water on the premises. There were no firearms on the premises. Facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit for residents. No deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted. This report is discussed and provided to facility Administrator, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 10, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Dec 22, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tao and Hanna conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPAs met Jasbindar Singh, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility has a capacity of six (6) to serve residents from age 60 and above which may have six (6) non-ambulatory and approved for four (4) hospice waiver. Current resident census is three (2). Two (2) residents are on hospice. During the visit, the infection control domain tool was used, a tour of the facility was conducted, food supply was reviewed, and medications were reviewed. This home is a single story house located in a residential neighborhood in Covina. It is a single story house with a ramp and a guard rail that leads to the front entrance, The facility consisted of five (5) bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, office, living room, dining, room, kitchen, back yard and a carport The kitchen was clean and has maintained the required two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non- perishable. Each resident's bedroom had a dresser, chair and closet space available. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supply were observed. Bathrooms inspected and were clean, operable, with the required grab bars and non-skid materials in the shower. Hot water temperature was in a range of 113.2 degrees Fahrenheit which was within Title 22 Regulation guidelines. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supplies. (-continued in LIC 809 C-) Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were operable. Fire extinguishers were fully charged and last service was on 1/20/21. Auditory devices were operable. Fire drill was conducted on 9/30/21. Administrator certificate had an expiration date on 4/11/23. The first aid kit was fully stocked. Mandated documents and signages were posted in common areas. The outdoor activity area had a shaded patio with ample seating. Medication is centrally stored. Resident records were stored in a locked storage room and inaccessible to residents. There are no pools and bodies of water on the premises. There were no firearms on the premises. Facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit for residents. Deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted. This report is discussed and provided to facility Administrator assistant, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2021

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 7, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Mountain View Centers, licensed since 2004.

Operates 8 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Mountain View Center · Claremont
  • Mountain View Cottages - V · Diamond Bar
  • Mountain View Cottages - II · Diamond Bar
  • Mountain View Cottages - I · Diamond Bar
  • Mountain View Cottages VII · Rialto
  • Mountain View Cottages-VI · Alta Loma
  • Mountain View Cottages-VIII · Montclair
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2004, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
12
Total complaints
4
Substantiated allegations
6
Type A citations
3
Type B citations
3

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2004, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations30
Type B citations30
Substantiated allegations60
Total complaints40

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Mountain View Cottages - IV

Is Mountain View Cottages - IV licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Mountain View Cottages - IV licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Mountain View Cottages - IV been cited?

3 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Mountain View Cottages - IV still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 9, 2026.

What does Mountain View Cottages - IV cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Mountain View Cottages - IV take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Mountain View Centers, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Mountain View Centers — at least 8 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Dimas Community Hospital is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Mountain View Cottages - IV keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Mountain View Cottages - IV license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES - IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198204376. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Mountain View Centers, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 6 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    San Dimas · 0.5 mi

    West Park Senior Living

    Large community · licensed for 200

    Starting rate

    $3,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Covina · 0.2 mi

    Maison De Fleurs

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Covina · 0.2 mi

    El Descanso Retirement Home

    Mid-size home · licensed for 15

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,750

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Covina · 0.3 mi

    St. Sebastian's Home for the Elderly III

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$6,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Dimas · 0.5 mi

    St. Jude's Elder Care II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Covina · 0.6 mi

    Greenpark Manor

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
MV

Call Mountain View Cottages - IV

Covina · Licensed for 6

(626) 966-4842

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Mountain View Cottages - IV

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages