Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Mountain View Cottages - IV

Small home·Licensed for 6·Covina, California

Licensed since 2004Licence #198204376Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 7, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitAugust 7, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderMountain View CentersSince 2004 · 8 licensed homes

Mountain View Cottages - IV is a small care home in Covina — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2004. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Mountain View Cottages - IV

Is Mountain View Cottages - IV licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Mountain View Cottages - IV licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Mountain View Cottages - IV been cited?

3 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Mountain View Cottages - IV still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Mountain View Cottages - IV cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Mountain View Cottages - IV take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Mountain View Centers, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Mountain View Centers — at least 8 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Dimas Community Hospital is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Mountain View Cottages - IV keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Mountain View Cottages - IV license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES - IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198204376. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Mountain View Centers, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 6 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGE 60 AND ABOVE. MAY RETAIN FOUR HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,200

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,450–$5,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,450–$5,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,400
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,050–$8,550
$6,200
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,600–$6,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 21027 West Covina Blvd., Covina, CA 91724Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2004. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 7, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
August 7, 2026
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 9, 2023 to August 7, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations6typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2004.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611120251102024220202344220221102021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Aug 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care. Physical plant is in disrepair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Staff, Elly Norsati. The purpose of the visit was explained. Administrator Jas Singh was informed of the visit via telephone. LPA toured the facility and interviewed two (2) staff and three (3) residents. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation – Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care. It is alleged that the house thermometer read at 97 degrees F on 8/1/26. LPA interviewed staff and residents regarding this allegation. Staff stated that there is a window air conditioner in each resident room but no central air conditioning. Staff stated that the residents appear comfortable with the indoor temperature. The house thermostat read at 90 degrees F during the visit today. Substantiated LPA interviewed three (3) residents, and they stated they are okay with the temperature in the house. However, a resident (Resident #1 - R1) was transported to the hospital earlier this month and was diagnosed with dehydration. LPA was unable to interview R1 as the resident is non-verbal. Staff stated that they cannot tell if R1 was comfortable or not since the resident is unable to express their needs. Based on information obtained, this allegation is substantiated. Allegation - Physical plant is in disrepair. It is alleged that the air conditioner is not working. LPA interviewed staff who acknowledged that the air conditioner in one of the residents’ rooms is not working. Two (2) out of the three (3) residents interviewed stated the air conditioners in their rooms work. LPA tested the wall air conditioner units in the three resident rooms, and (2) were not working properly. One did not turn on, and the other was not blowing out cool air. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. Based on LPA observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260803153029

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 8, 2026

87303 Maintenance and Operation(b) A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained...(2)The facility shall cool rooms to a comfortable range, between 78 degrees F (26 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C)... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, the faciity's indoor was measured at 90 degrees F and resident went to the hospital for dehydration which posed a immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure the facility temperature is at a comfortable range, between 78 and 85 degrees F. A plan to ensure the temperature will stay in the range shall be submitted to LPA by 8/8/26.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 14, 2026

87303 Maintenance and Operation(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, 2 out of the 3 resident rooms do not have air conditioners properly working which poses a potential health and safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee shall ensure that all air conditioning units in the facility are working properly. The licensee shall submit proof of installation of new air conditioners or air conditioners in working order by POC due date 8/14/26.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vaid conducted an unannounced Annual Required 1-year visit. Staff person Fiviyanti Lo allowed entry into facility. LPA was met by Administrator Jasbindar Singh and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve six (6) non ambulatory residents over the age of 60 and has an approved hospice waiver for four (4). Currently one(1) resident is under hospice. The visit consisted of the completion of CARE tool, interviews of staff/residents, conduct of physical plant, and reviews of food supply/ medications/ facility records. Physical Plant: The facility is a single-story dwelling located on a main street with three (3) resident bedrooms, two (2) staff bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, living room, front yard, backyard, and attached garage. Front yard was clean and well maintained. LPA Vaid observed sufficient 2 days of perishables and 7-day supply on non-perishables. LPA Vaid observed knives and sharps located in kitchen cabinet, to be inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen sink water temperature was measured at 114.2 degrees F. Kitchen appliances were observed to be clean and in working order. Dining room was observed to be clean and contained one table with plenty of seating. Living room was observed to have plenty of seating and lighting. Interior temperature measured at 78 degree F. Backyard was clean and well maintained. Plenty of shade and seating was observed. Linen Closet: Contained plenty linens, towels, and hygiene products. Resident Rooms : LPA Vaid inspected three (3) resident bedrooms and observed all bedrooms to contain required furnishings, lighting, and linens. CONTINUED ON PAGE 809C.......... Bathrooms: Water temperature in both resident bathrooms were within 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed grab bars and shower chair and non skid mats. Emergency Drills: Last documented drill was conducted on 10/08/2025 at 2 pm. Carbon Monoxide Detectors/Fire Alarm/Fire Extinguisher & Emergency Disaster Plan: LPA observed carbon monoxide in hallways and smoke detectors were observed to be operable. Resident /Staff Files: Four (4) resident files were reviewed. LPA Vaid reviewed staff files for three (3) staff. Personnel records are maintained at facility. Liability Insurance & Infection Control Plan: Facility has current liability insurance on file. LPA Vaid observed updated infection control plan. Laundry Room: LPA Vaid observed laundry room operational and clean, toxins are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. No deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted. This report is discussed and provided to facility Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPA met Jasbindar Singh, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility has a capacity of six (6) to serve residents from age 60 and above which may have six (6) non-ambulatory and approved for four (4) hospice waiver. One (1) resident is on hospice. Annual fee is current. Administrator certificate is current with expiration date on 4/11/25 The visit consisted of the completion of CARE tool, interviews of staff/residents, conduct of physical plant, and reviews of food supply/ medications/ facility records. This facility is a single story house located in a residential neighborhood in Covina. The facility consisted of five (5) bedrooms which including three (3) resident bedrooms and two (2) staff bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, office, living room, dining room, kitchen, and back yard. Kitchen was clean and had maintained the required two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non- perishable. Each resident's bedrooms were furnished with required furniture. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supply were observed. Bathrooms inspected and were clean, operable, with the required grab bars and non-skid materials in the shower. Hot water temperature was measured at 106.9 degrees Fahrenheit which was within Title 22 Regulation guidelines. Adequate linen and personal hygiene supplies were observed. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were operable. Fire extinguishers were fully charged and last service was on 02/20/24. Fire drill was conducted on 11/19/24. Auditory devices were operable. Medication is centrally stored and current. Resident records were stored in a locked storage room and inaccessible to residents. Facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit for residents. No deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted. This report is discussed and provided to facility Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024
Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An Informal Conference meeting was held at the Monterey Park Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. Present during this meeting were Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Fernando Fierros, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bonnie Tao, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tyler Reyes and from MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES were Licensee Smita Sanghvit, administrator Trupti Mody, administrator Laura Hernandez, and administrator Jasbindar Singh. The following items listed below were discussed during today's meeting: · Complaint investigation findings for complaint # 28-AS-20210128160641. · Adequate staffing and appropriate care and supervision for residents in care. · Obtaining timely medical care or treatment for residents in care. · Criminal Record Clearance and Associating staff. · Maintenance and Operation: Facility shall be kept clean and in good repair. The facility free from pest. · Immediate Civil Penalties The following Title 22 topics were discussed and a copy of the Section given during office meeting: · Personnel Requirements – General Section 87411 · Maintenance and Operation Section 87303 · Storage Space Section 87309 · Care of Persons with Dementia Section 87705 · Criminal Record Clearance Section 87355 (-continued in LIC 809C-) Licensee was requested to provide procedure plan regarding staff obtaining timely medical care/ treatment for residents by due date 2/21/24. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee and Administrators, and a copy of this licensing report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident suffered a fall resulting in a fracture. Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Maldonado conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Maldonado met with Administrator, Jasbindar Singh, and explained the purpose for the visit. On 01/29/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted the initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. Due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and to implement mitigation measures, the complaint investigation was conducted via tele-conference with Administrator, Jasbindar Singh. During the virtual visit, LPA Tao conducted a health and safety check and requested a copy of the Staff and Resident roster. LPA Tao virtually toured the facility via Facetime with Administrator and observed that the facility is clean and in good repair. LPA observed nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days. LPA Tao observed wash basins, showers/bathtubs and toilets were operable and did not observe any immediate health and safety concerns. (Report Continued on LIC9099-C...) Substantiated The investigation of the above-mentioned allegations was conducted by the licensing agency's Investigation Bureau. The investigation was conducted by the assigned Investigator, Dennis Seng and consisted of the following: Interviews conducted with Administrator (S1) and Staff #2 - #3 (S2 & S3), Residents #1 - #4 (R1, R2, R3 & R4), Witnesses #1 & #2 (W1 & W2), and Staff at other agencies (W3 & W4), including Adult Protective Services and Long-Term Care Ombudsman program. Investigator Seng also reviewed R1's facility file/documentation, including incident reports dated 10/23/20, and medical records dated 11/03/20 and 11/06/20. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident suffered a fall resulting in a fracture. It was alleged that R1, who was deemed a fall risk, fell over a raised threshold in the doorway while ambulating, due to staff failing to assist R1. Interviews with (4) of (4) staff indicated that R1 fell in the facility and that R1’s family did not want the facility staff to call 911. (3) of (4) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegations. Per incident report dated 10/23/20, it was indicated that R1 had a fall at the facility, was helped back into bed, and responsible parties were notified. Interviews with W1-W2 revealed that on 10/23/20, R1 called W1-W2 regarding the fall and stated to be in pain and asked to go to the hospital. However, facility staff informed W1-W2 that staff were unable to arrange R1’s transportation. Interviews with W3-W4 revealed that R1 fell in the facility on 10/23/20 and was not seen by a medical professional until early November 2020. Review of R1's file revealed that R1 was a fall risk as indicated on R1’s Individual Service Plan, dated 09/17/20. Therefore, based on the investigation, the facility failed to provide resident with adequate care and supervision, which resulted in R1 falling and sustaining an injury. Regarding Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. It was alleged that after R1 fell at the facility while being a fall risk, R1 expressed pain to staff and requested an x-ray be taken; However, staff did not obtain medical treatment for the resident until a week later. During the investigation, Investigator Seng reviewed R1’s facility file/documentation, including incident reports dated 10/23/20, and medical reports dated 11/03/20 and 11/06/20. Per the incident report dated 10/23/20, R1 fell over a raised threshold in doorway at the facility while walking into R1’s room. R1 informed S3-S4 that R1 was in pain and wanted to go to the hospital to get an x-ray. Administrator and staff spoke with W1-W2, and per Administrator, W1 and W2 requested R1 not be sent out for medical treatment. Per medical records review, it was discovered that R1 did not receive medical treatment until 11/03/20, which was (11) days after the fall occurred 10/23/20. X-rays taken on 11/06/20 revealed that R1 sustained a fracture to the right hand. Therefore, based on the investigation, staff failed to seek timely medical attention for R1, after R1 fell at the facility and expressed pain to staff, which resulted in a fracture to R1's right hand. (Report continued on LIC9099-C...) Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be Substantiated. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8, deficiencies will be cited on the attached LIC9099-D. An immediate $500 civil penalty is being issued during today's visit due to the lack of care and supervision that occurred on 10/23/20 when R1 fell in the facility and sustained a fractured right hand. “The licensee was informed that a civil penalty might be assessed based on the Health & Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), or 1568.0822(e) or (f).“ An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, along with appeal rights, were discussed and provided to Administrator, Jasbindar Singh. During today's visit, LPA Maldonado obtained a copy of the resident and staff rosters, Facesheet and Physician's Reports for Residents# 2, and #5-7 (R2, and R5-R7), and conducted a tour of the physical plant with assistance of Administrator Singh. Interviews were also conducted with Staff# 1 and #4 (S1 and S4), and attempted interviews with R2, and R5-R7. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility is in disrepair. It was alleged that during the winter months of 2020, the facility heater was in disrepair for one month and delays in plumbing issues on a single toilet shared by (5) residents. Per interviews with staff, S1 stated that although the central heating system was not operating properly for a short period of time, individual heater units were brought in the home and each resident had one placed in their room. S1 also stated that although they did have a plumbing issue on Thanksgiving Day of 2020 in one restroom, the residents were able to use the other restroom in the home, as needed. S4 states no work receipt is available, but recalls the incident and stated that a plumber came the following day to repair it, as it was difficult to have anyone come out on Thanksgiving Day. S4 could not corroborate the allegation as S4 states to not have worked at the facility at the time of the alleged. (4) of (4) residents could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour of the physical plant, LPA observed the thermostat temperature set at 82*F inside the home. LPA observed all resident rooms and common areas to have heat vents, and observed them to be operating properly. LPA also inspected the (2) bathrooms in the home and observed them to be clean, sanitary, and were operable during the visit. Regarding allegation: Staff did not provide an adequate amount of food to resident. It was alleged that R1 did not receive enough food during meals and was given (4) yogurts for Thanksgiving dinner. (2) of (2) staff interviewed denied the allegations and stated that there is always sufficient amount of food/groceries available at the facility for residents. Staff stated that residents are provided with (3) meals and (3) snacks of their choice every day. (1) of (4) residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that sufficient food is given during meals and snacks are always available. LPA attempted interviews with (3) of (4) residents- they could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour of the physical plant, LPA inspected the food supplies and observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foods available for the number of residents in care, which included milk, eggs, vegetables, meats, cereals, cookies, oatmeal, pudding cups, and fresh fruits. (Report continued on LIC9099-C...) Regarding allegation: Resident was denied food. It was alleged that facility staff denied R1 more food, after not receiving enough food to satisfy R1's hunger. (2) of (2) staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that there is always sufficient food at the facility to give to residents if they wish to have more. Staff also stated that the residents are allowed to take whatever they wish at any time from the kitchen or pantry. They may sometimes request it directly from staff and staff will assist the residents with it. Staff stated that residents are provided with (3) meals and (3) snacks of their choice, per day. (1) of (4) residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that all residents are given whatever amount of food they want. LPA attempted interviews with (3) of (4) residents- they could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour of the physical plant, LPA inspected the food supplies and observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable foods available for the number of residents in care, which included milk, eggs, vegetables, meats, cereals, cookies, oatmeal, pudding cups, and fresh fruits. LPA did not observe any food items hidden, locked, or inaccessible to residents in care. Based on the LPA's record review, interviews, and observations, the investigation revealed: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Jasbindar Singh, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210128160641

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 13, 2023

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, facility staff failed to provide necessary supervision for (1) of (4) residents who fell at the facility and resulted in a fractured hand, which poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a plan in writing on how facility staff will ensure to meet the needs of all residents including proper care and supervision, per their Individual Needs and Services Plans. Written plan to be submitted to LPA via email by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2023

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g)The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, facility staff failed to seek timely medical attention for (1) of (4) residents, after falling in the facility and sustaining a fracture to the right hand, which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will conduct in-service training for all facilty staff on obtaining proper medical care for residents as needed/required. Copy of training material and sign-in sheet to be sent to LPA via email by POC due date.

Nov 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced Annual Required 1-year Visit on 11/26//2023. LPA was met by Administrator Jasbindar Singh and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve six (6) non ambulatory residents over the age of 60 and has an approved hospice waiver for four (4). LPA OBSERVATIONS: The facility is a single-story dwelling located on a main street with three (3) resident bedrooms, two (2) staff bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, living room, front yard, backyard, and attached garage. Front Yard: Was clean and well maintained. LPA Ramirez observed gate that leads to backyard to be wide open. Kitchen: LPA Ramirez observed sufficient 2 days of perishables and 7-day supply on non-perishables. LPA Ramirez observed knives and sharps located in kitchen cabinet, to be inaccessible to four (4) out of four (4) residents in care. LPA Ramirez observed several bottles of cleaning solutions and disinfectants located nearby kitchen hallway cabinet, to be accessible to four (4) out of four (4) residents in care. LPA Ramirez observed a sign posted on cabinet door indicating to “lock cupboards at all times”, a pad lock was observed but not secured. Kitchen sink water temperature was measured at 114.2 degrees F. Kitchen appliances were observed to be clean and in working order. Two cabinet doors located by sink were in disrepair. Cabinet drawer containing paper items was loose and not opening correctly to its original design. LPA could see exposed nails. Upper cabinet door containing resident plates, cups and other dishware, was missing doorknob. Dining Room/Living room/: Dining room was observed to be clean and contained one table with plenty of seating. Living room was observed to have plenty of seating and lighting. Nearby thermostat was observed to read 78 degree F. Linen Closet: Contained plenty linens, towels, and hygiene products. SEE 809-C Resident Rooms 1 - 3: LPA Ramirez inspected three (3) resident bedrooms and observed all bedrooms to contain required furnishings, lighting, and linens. Auditory device located on resident#2 exit door that leads to back yard, was observed to be in “Off” position. Administrator Singh placed device in “On” position after LPA Ramirez expressed concern. Bathrooms: Water temperature in both resident bathrooms were within 105- 120 degrees F. Bathroom #2 located near laundry room was observed to have 6 x 6 gap in flooring. LPA touched flooring and wood felt soft and wet. LPA Ramirez observed wall near outside shower tile to be stain with brownish-yellow stains, dry wall was peeling and cracking on both sides. Backyard: Was clean and well maintained. Plenty of shade and seating was observed. LPA Ramirez observed back yard gate to be wide open. Emergency Drills: Last documented drill was conducted on 11/11/23 at 3 pm. Carbon Monoxide Detectors/Fire Alarm/Fire Extinguisher & Emergency Disaster Plan: LPA observed carbon monoxide in hallways and smoke detectors were observed to be operable. Personnel Records: Personnel records are maintained at facility. LPA Ramirez reviewed staff files for three (3) staff. Resident Files: Four (4) resident files were reviewed. Liability Insurance & Infection Control Plan: Facility has current liability insurance on file. LPA Ramirez observed updated infection control plan. Laundry Room: LPA Ramirez observed laundry room door to be wide open and access to bleach and laundry soap were observed. LPA Ramirez observed two (2) back doors near laundry room, to have auditory devices switched in “OFF” position and doors were observed to be wide open. Deficiencies are being cited and a copy of this report, 809-D and appeals rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Mountain View Centers, licensed since 2004, operates 8 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County