This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Licensee Initiated”, September 27, 2026.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care

Small home·6 while this license was open·Paso Robles, California

Closed in state recordLicence #405850222
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit2 of 6 beds occupiedJune 4, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Licence holderLifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home CareSince 2022 · 3 licensed homes

Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care in Paso Robles held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2022. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Licensee Initiated.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care

Is Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Licensee Initiated,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care been cited?

3 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

What does Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Paso Robles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,000 to $6,250 a month, and the middle figure is $5,475 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LIFETOUCH THE ELEGANT LIVING RESIDENTIAL HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #405850222. The state lists this license as “Closed, Licensee Initiated,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE DEDRIDDEN. BDRM #1 AND #2 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $3,750–$7,000

From homes this size in San Luis Obispo County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $3,750–$7,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $3,750–$7,000

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 18 small homes publish in San Luis Obispo County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$7,100
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,650–$9,950
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 18 small homes publish in San Luis Obispo County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Where it is

  • 1934 Tulipwood Drive, Paso Robles, CA 93446Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

A map position is not on file for this address.

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 19, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
14
Most recent visit
March 19, 2026
Occupied · June 4, 2025 visit
2 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 6, 2022 to June 4, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 0
  • Total complaints5typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253312024120202322120223312021110

The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

At 12:25pm on 3/19/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a facility closure visit. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Amelita Aquino announced who he was and the reason for the visit. Licensee informed LPA via text message on 3/17/2026 and via email on 3/18/2026 that they have closed the facility and there are no residents residing in the facility. LPA and Licensee conducted a full tour of facility and facility property during today's visit. LPA noted that all rooms were empty and no indication of residents residing in the facility. LPA collected the physical facility license. LPA noted that the facility appeared to be absent of all residents at this visit and the Licensee indicated that the last time a resident resided at the facility was 3/5/2026. Exit interview conducted, report signed, and report provided to the Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026
Jan 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 9:10am, on 1/9/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Lead Staff Dennis Paguio and staff Mary Damasco, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. Dennis, Mary, and LPA conducted a full tour of the facility. This facility is a single story residential home with four resident bedrooms (two are dual occupancy), three full bathrooms (two are en-suite to resident bedrooms and one is for shared use) and a staff bedroom is accessible from the backyard. There is a living room, dining space, and a kitchen. Access to the garage is through a locked door for resident safety. The laundry is behind accordion doors with locking cabinets for the chemicals. LPA noted that the backyard and the front yard both have seating and shade for residents and visitors. LPA noted fresh fruit in the kitchen for residents to enjoy freely. The facility has battery operated smoke detectors in each room that are all working, the carbon monoxide detector is near the front door and functioning normally. LPA observed a fire extinguisher near the kitchen that was tagged current and in the green compression range, serviced on 1/22/2025. At 9:29am LPA tested facility hot water at 130.1*(f) in the shared bathroom in the hallway, not within regulation temperatures 105*-120* (f). This facility has one hot water heater delivering water to all faucets. LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods. During the tour the LPA noted the following items unattended and accessible to residents in care: at 9:27am LPA noted a can of Ajax and two aerosol cans of Febreze in the shared public bathroom in the hallway; at 9:42am lidocaine ointment, nail polish remover, ibuprofen, and Tylenol in the furniture next to the dining room table; at 9:45am ten bottles of over-the-counter medications in the furniture to the left of the garage door; at (Continue LIC809-C) 9:59am in the backyard a bottle of bleach and bottle of multi-purpose cleaner; at 10:00am an unlocked shed containing paint cans, a medication bubble pack and yard equipment; at 10:02am to the left of the shed a container with seven car cleaning chemicals. LPA noted that the facility is clean with no obstructions in hallways and doorways. Medications are locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records. LPA conducted a staff and resident record review. LPA noted during facility file review the Licensee/Entity LIFETOUCH THE ELEGANT LIVING RESIDENTIAL HOME CARE (RCFE), INC is suspended per the California Secretary of State as of 5/1/2025. LPA and Lead Staff conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. LPA spoke with Administrator Aimelita Aquino over the phone to review the visit together. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited on LIC809-D pages, report signed, and report provided to the Lead Staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2026

The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care.

At 7:30am on 06/04/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct the initial investigation to the allegation to this complaint and LPA was also able to issue final findings to this allegation based on observations, interviews, and documentation. LPA met with Direct Care Staff, Dennis Pagio (S2) and Direct Care Staff, Cora Castillo (S2), LPA contacted Administrator by phone who had scheduled appointments and requested staff review and sign complaint report. As to the allegation of, "Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care." It was alleged that, the air conditioner was not working during a hot day. It was discovered by observation, documentation, and interviewees. On 06/04/2025, LPA Jeffries conducted an interview with S1, who stated that the Air Condition has always worked and has never been broken since he has been working at the facility (2015). On 06/04/2025, LPA Jeffries conducted an interview with S1, who stated that the air conditioner has always been working and the facility stays cold and never gets hot. S1 has been working at the facility for 3 months. On 06/04/2025, LPA Jeffries conducted an interview with Resident 1 (R1) R1 stated that the facility CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated is always comfortable and has never had any issues with it being to hot or cold. On 06//04/2025 R2 declined to be interviewed. On 06/04/2025, LPA Jeffries observed the air conditioner to be operating normally, and the facility was a comfortable 70*(f) at 9:30am on 06/04/2025. LPA noted that there was a clear frame around the thermostat control with no cover, allowing full access to the thermostat control by everyone in the facility. LPA noted that on 06/02/2025, Paso Robles Police Officer, Stewart reported that, "Facility was orderly, neat, taken care of. Could feel AC blowing from vent, comfortable temperature. No issue with AC." to a phone call to Community Care Licensing Department CCLD on 06/03/2025. At this time there is not enough evidence to support the allegation of, "Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care." and is unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250602162744
Apr 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Uncleared individual(s) are caring for residents

On 04/08/2025 at 08:57am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Amelita Aquino and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff, residents, administrator, and obtained relevant documents. On the allegation: Uncleared individual(s) are caring for residents. It was alleged the facility has uncleared individuals working and caring for the residents. LPA reviewed 5 of 5 staff fingerprint clearances. LPA noted three individuals in the facility, two were cleared staff. LPA noted the third individual, Person 1 (P1), is not fingerprint cleared and was cooking and cleaning in the facility at the time of the visit. Resident and staff interviews revealed P1 has contact with the residents, resides in the facility part-time, and provides resident assistance in bathing. (Continued LIC9099-C) Substantiated Resident and staff interviews and resident record review revealed R1 and R2 do not require transfer or lift assistance. Resident interview revealed staff are meeting their needs. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview and report given. P1 was able to leave the facility as two cleared staff were present and able to meet the needs of the residents. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview, deficiencies cited on 9099-D, civil penalty issued, report given, and appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250404134901

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 9, 2025

Criminal Record Clearance. All individuals subject to a criminal record review…shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption…This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when Administrator allowed a non-cleared person, P1, to have contact with the residents, reside in the facility, and assist resident bathing, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to not allow P1 back into the facility until they are fingerprint cleared and have P1 fingerprinted by Livescan in the next 24 hours. Administrator will email LPA clearance documentation prior to allowing P1 back in the facility.

Jan 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 12:05pm on 01/07/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Amelita I. Aquino announced who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the facility which consist of 4 resident bedrooms, 1 staff bedroom, 3 bathrooms, living room, kitchen, dining room and outdoor area in back with shade for residents and visitors and a garage. LPA noted that there are smoke detector in each resident room and a new carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen. LPA observed the fire extinguisher primed in the green and currently tagged for service. LPA noted that all hallways and exits are free and clear of obstructions and the facility was clean and in good repair. LPA noted that a review of the Centrally Stored Medication Records (CSMR) was conducted. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet located in the dining room area. LPA noted that the water temperature in the facility was measured within regulation range of 105*-120*(f). LPA noted that he observed at least two days of perishable and at least seven days on non perishable foods on hand. LPA noted that chemicals were locked in the closet above the washer and dryer also in the dinning room area. LPA noted that the facility appeared to be clean and in good repair. LPA noted that bedrooms had appropriate linin and storage. Each room had a working lamps. LPA conducted a staff and resident file review. LPA reviewed facilities Emergency Disaster Plan and Infection Control Plan. LPA noted that bedroom #4 has a sliding door leading to staff bedroom and there are two different facility sketches associated with the facility and the fire inspection does not decimate which facility sketch is accurate. Administrator to stay in CCLD regulation compliance has scheduled for slider to be permenatly closed per city of Paso Robles approval and new fire inspection will be requested at that time that door being covered is completed. LPA cited for personal accommodations, using resident room as passage [87307(a)(2)(C).] Full care tools modules for annual facility inspection was conducted. No other citations issued. Exit interview, report read, appeal rights and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2025
20241 state visit · 2 documents
Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed a pressure injury due to neglect by staff. Staff are not addressing residents bathing needs. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident in care.

At on 11/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to issue finial findings to the allegations to this complaint and a case management visit related to this complaint on a separate report during this visit. LPA met with announced who he is and the reason for the visit. As to the allegation of, “Resident developed a pressure injury due to neglect by staff.”, “Staff are not addressing residents bathing needs.” And “Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident in care.” It was discovered through interviews, reliable witness (W1) (with current medical license) observation, documentation, and photographic evidence that on 11/14/2024 Resident 1 (R1) was seen by Emergency Room staff and observed two pressure injuries (level 2) about 15 millimeters on the resident’s sacrum. At 8:38am on 11/05/2024, LPA Jeffries contacted W1 who stated, R1 had a stage 2 wound on their lower back (Sacrum) that was not being addressed. Additionally, W1 stated that, R1 had crusted scalp, severe dandruff, crusted skin all over their (R1) body, yeast under the folds of their skin, and dry blood in ears.” On 11/05/2024, CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated LPA Jeffries conducted an interview with Facility Administrator and Licensee, Amelita I. Aquino, who stated that R1’s complete resident file was in a green folder and given to the Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) when they transported R1 to the hospital on 11/04/2024. Only documentation Administrator had for R1 was R1’s LIC602 (Physician Report), Skilled Nursing Visit Report (SKR) dated 10/29/2024 from Central Coast Home Health Inc. and R1’s Centrally Stored Medication Record (CSMR). On 11/19/2024 LPA Jeffries received an email from Administrator Licensee that R1’s file was lost. On 11/05/2024, LPA Jeffries reviewed documentation of R1’s Physicians Report (LIC602) signed and dated 01/26/2024 which indicated R1 having a primary diagnose of Chronic venous stasis ulcers to BLE's" [medical condition where open sores (ulcers) develop on the lower extremities (BLE's - below the knee) due to poor blood flow in the leg veins], additionally a history of skin break down, also requiring help in Activities of Daily Living (ADL’s) in bathing, grooming, and toileting needs. Both staff stated R1 could walk around in the backyard for exercise, and regularly slept in a recliner. Staff all indicated R1 was able to reposition themselves in the recliner, and transfer themselves from the walker to and from the recliner, and to and from the shower chair. LPA reviewed SKR dated 10/29/2024, indicating a Licensed Skilled Professional attended and dressed two wounds (stage 2) located on the left and right side of R1’s buttock (same area as Sacrum). On 11/18/2024, LPA Jeffries interviewed direct care staff 1 (S1) who stated that R1 had regularly schedule showers every other day. S1 stated that on 11/03/2024, R1 was provided a sponge bath due to mobility issues. S1 stated that every other day prior to 11/03/2024, R1 was provided full assistance with a full shower and bathing routine. S1 stated that R1 had chronic skin conditions that required full showering routine due to scalp and skin condition. S1 stated that there was a dime size wound on R1’s lower back that was treated by Home Health and facility staff twice per week. On 11/05/2024, interviews with S2 and administrator, both stated that R1 would have full shower and bathing assistance every other day, as well as wound care by Central Coast Home Health twice per week. On 11/05/2024 LPA Jeffries attempted to interview 4 of 4 residents at the facility, however no resident was able to complete interview. LPA noted that 4 of 4 residents were clean, free of odors and appeared to be well groomed. LPA attempted to interview R1’s responsible party, but LPA’s calls were not returned. LPA attempted to obtain photographs of R1’s condition from W1, but the photographs were never provided to LPA. LPA attempted to interview home health personnel who visited R1, but personnel declined LPAs requests for interview. LPA also reached out to the licensee for direct phone numbers and names of home health personnel, but licensee was unable to provide the documents. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Additionally, the licensee attempted to track down R1’s resident file that was sent with EMTs however was unsuccessful. Based on Interviews, SKR documentation, and observations, home health was treating R1’s pressure injuries, staff assisted R1 with bathing, R1 had a skin condition, and R1 was able to walk around independently. There is not enough evidence to support the allegations of, “Resident developed a pressure injury due to neglect by staff.”, “Staff are not addressing residents bathing needs.” And “Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident in care.” and are all unsubstantiated at this time. The issues of the licensee losing their original copy of R1’s file and their lack of reporting will be addressed on a separate case management report. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241104143354
Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

At on 11/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a case management visit related to a complaint finial findings (29-AS-20241104143354) visit being issued on this same visit. LPA met with announced who he is and the reason for the visit. During the above-mentioned complaint, it was discovered through interviews on 11/05/2024 Licensee/Administrator stated on 11/04/2024, facility staff accidently gave Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT’s) Resident 1 (R1) full resident file, containing documents including but not limited to Pre Admissions Appraisals, Appraisals Needs and Services Plan, Admissions Agreement, Hospital and Physician Visit, Home Heath Care documentation and other documentation. Licensee/Administrator made several attempts to located R1’s file including Calling both hospitals, EMT company, Placement Agency, and R1’s son. On 11/18/2024, Licensee/Administrator sent LPA Jeffries and email that R1’s file was, “nowhere to be found.” On 11/17/2024 LPA Jeffries contacted Licensee/Administrator by phone and requested Incident report for R1 for 11/04/2024 hospitalization and death report for same date. Licensee/Administrator stated, “I was so nervous, I forgot”. Licensee emailed LPA Jeffries incident report on 11/17/2024, and an informal email stating that, facility was “Waiting for the Death Certificate from The Coroner's office to provide a copy.” LPA noted that on 08/29/2023, during a prior complaint investigation, and 12/12/2023 during an annual inspection, and an email on 08/14/2024, the regulation requirements for timely reporting, including where, who and how to report. LPA noted that the incident report and the death report were not submitted to LPA’s email until 12 days after the incident and death. Additionally, Licensee/Administrator did not safeguard Resident information and Resident files to keep for 36 months. LPA noted that the facility is cited for Reporting Requirements [87211(a)(1)(A)]. LPA noted that facility is cited for Resident Records [87506(c)(1) and 87506 (e).] Exit interview, report read, appeal rights and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(c)(1)and(e) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 5, 2024

Resident Records 87506(c)All information and records obtained from or regarding residents shall be confidential. (1) The licensee shall be responsible fo...r safeguarding the confidentiality of their contents. The licensee and all employees shall reveal or make available ... .(e)Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident. This requirement was note met by evidence of R1's lost full file and is a potential risk fore residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to continue to search for R1's missing folder and report by 12/05/2024 that efforts of search and results with incident report submitted to LPA via email.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 5, 2024

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency ...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing ..(A)Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred.... the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified .... This requirement was not met by evidence of R1/s incident report being request past the 10 day submission limits, which poses a risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to create a facility procedure and standardized resident information form for Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT) when residents are transported to the hospital and sample of all current residents in care by 12/05/2024, via email to LPA

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 10:15am on 12/12/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Amelita I. Aquino announced who he was and the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the facility which consist of 4 resident bedrooms, 1 staff bedroom, 3 bathrooms, living room, kitchen, dining room and outdoor area in back with shade for residents and visitors. LPA noted that there are smoke detector/carbon monoxide combos in each resident room. LPA observed the fire extinguisher primed in the green and currently tagged for service. LPA required Administrator to add two additional smoke detectors in the living room and the kitchen/dining room area for full coverage of the facility. LPA noted that all hallways and exits are free and clear of obstructions and no other fire clearance issues were noted during the facility physical tour. LPA noted that a review of the Centrally Stored Medication Records (CSMR) was conducted. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet located in the dining room area. LPA noted that the water temperature in the facility was measured within regulation range of 105*-120*(f). LPA noted that he observed at least two days of perishable and at least seven days on non perishable foods on hand. LPA noted that chemicals were locked in the closet above the washer and dryer also in the dinning room area. LPA noted that the facility appeared to be clean and in good repair. LPA noted that bedrooms had appropriate linin and storage. Each room had a working lamp, however the lamp was not connected to the wall switch in any of the resident rooms. LPA requested Administrator to provide safe lighting for each residents room. Administrator and LPA conducted a full review of the annual care tools module. During the care tool modules a technical violation was issued for insurance not showing $3 million in aggregate, Administrator will provided proof of $3M aggregate coverage by 12/27/2023. A technical advisory was issued on lamp for resident room #3 lamp, Administrator will fix and sent proof to LPA. No other citations or violations were issued as a result of the full annual inspection. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Lifetouch the Elegant Living Residential Home Care, licensed since 2022, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in San Luis Obispo County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Luis Obispo County