Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors
Mid-size home·Licensed for 22·Kernville, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Typical starting rate$4,500 a monthTypical in Kern County · likely $3,500–$5,500
- Home sizeLicensed for 22Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit20 of 22 beds occupiedJune 16, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
- Last state visitAugust 31, 2026CDSS inspection record
Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors is a mid-size care home in Kernville — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 22 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors
Is Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors licensed for?
22 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors been cited?
6 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 35 state visits over the same years.
Is Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors cost?
$4,500 a month to start is typical in Kern County, likely $3,500–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Kern County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 18 other homes of a similar licensed size across Kern County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $4,200 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 18 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Redwood Kernville Opco LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Can Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Kern Village Assisted Living for Seniors license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “KERN VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING FOR SENIORS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #157209373. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 22 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Redwood Kernville Opco LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 35 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 6 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 35 state visits in that period.
- 19 complaints and 12 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 31, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 22 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 22 NON-AMBULATORY.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
caring.com · 2026-09-09
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
2 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Works with hospice
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Level of medication serviceReminders only
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Nights & staffing
Training topics namedStaff trained in memory careWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
What it costs here
Typical starting rate
$4,500a month to start
Likely $3,500–$5,500
Covelight’s researched range for Kern County · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,500a month
Likely $3,500–$5,500
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,500–$5,500
Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Kern County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.
Help with daily careIncludedper the home
The home lists its rent as all-inclusive on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026. Ask which care needs would change the monthly rate.
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,750
- $6,500
Costs & moving in
How care costs are added to the rentAll inclusive
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Payment methodsCheck · Credit card
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure
Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Kern County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Where it is
- 32 Burlando Road, Kernville, CA 93238Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 29 documents for this home, and its records count 35 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 25, 2026.
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 35
- Most recent visit
- August 31, 2026
- Occupied · June 16, 2026 visit
- 20 of 22 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 19 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 12, 2024 to June 16, 2026. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 19 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations6typical 0
- Type B citations3typical 1
- Substantiated allegations12typical 2
- Total complaints19typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 28 of 29 documents
Aug 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Annual/Random
On 08/25/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an annual visit. LPA was greeted by Administrator Wendy Lee and granted entry into the facility. LPA introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted tour with A1. Residents were observed in the common areas, bedrooms, and in the courtyard during inspection. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. The facility was observed clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards were observed inside or outside. Medications observed kept locked in medication cart in the facility office. Kitchen was toured. 2-days perishable food and 7-days non-perishable food were observed. Dishwasher was observed operational during inspection. Last fire drill was completed on 7/23/26. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility with a service date of 05/04/26. Cleaning solutions observed stored and locked under kitchen sink and under staff bathroom sink. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 39 degrees F and freezer temperature was maintained at 0 degrees F. Sharps observed locked in kitchen drawer. All bedrooms were observed to have required furnishings with adequate lighting and at comfortable temperature. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were tested and observed to be operational. Bathrooms were observed with grab bars and nonskid mats. All bathroom’s hot water temperature was tested. LPA observed chemicals stored and locked in the laundry room and in shed 1. (CONTINUED TO LIC 809C ) (CONTINUED FROM LIC 809) Outside of the facility toured and observed to be free of debris. Adequate outdoor seating was observed to be available for residents. Designated smoking area observed available for residents. LPA observed fence gates on each side of the courtyard locked. A sample of resident and staff files were reviewed. First aid kit observed with required items. A deficiency is being cited on the attached 809D in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Exit Interview conducted. A copy of current Administrator Certificate was received. The following documents are requested and submitted to Fresno CCL by: 08/31/26. Forms requested: Lic 308, Lic 500, current liability insurance, Lic 610E, and current Administrator certificate. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2026
Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff spoke inappropriately to residents in care Staff did not allow residents to leave the facility
On 06/16/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Lee and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA delivered complaint findings on the above allegations during visit. During the course of the investigation, records were reviewed, the facility was toured, and interviews were conducted. Residents confirmed staff speaks to residents nicely and in a gently voice. Residents were allowed to leave the facility supervised by staff and unsupervised according to physician’s order. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260608134743
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 06/16/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang conducted case management visit for the purpose on the health and safety of the residents in care. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Wendy Lee. The purpose of today's visit is to follow up on information that was received at the Fresno Regional office. The issues included: cash handling, medication error, mishandling residents’ belongings, staff verbally and physically abuse residents. Interviews were conducted with residents, records were reviewed, and facility was toured. No deficiencies issued. No additional follow-up is required. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026
May 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from fighting
On 05/27/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint investigation and deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Lee and stated the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, records were reviewed, facility was toured, and interviews were conducted. Due to the lack of supervision, R2 has wandering behavior and had wandered into R1’s room without supervision leading to a physical altercation where R2 was sent to the hospital for medical treatment. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260521094940
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 28, 2026
87411(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records review, R1 and R2 had physical altercation where R2 was sent to the hospital for medical treatment after R2 had wandered into R1’s room without supervision, which poses an immediate health and safety risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility will submit a statement letter providing steps how the facility will ensure the residents who wanders are safe. Statement will be submitted to the Fresno CCL by POC due date 05/28/26.
Feb 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not treat residents with respect. Staff are not ensuring activities are consistent.
On 02/25/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Wendy Lee. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, records were reviewed and toured the facility. Facility has variety of activities provided for residents. Allegation alleging staff did not treat residents with respect and alleging staff are not ensuring activities are consistent, although the allegation may have happened or is valid. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260218090257
Feb 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner. Staff member worked while under the influence of alcohol impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision to residents in care.
On 02/25/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Wendy Lee. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, records were reviewed and toured the facility. Based on interviews conducted, allegation alleging staff did not ensure resident are spoken to in an appropriate manner and staff worked while under the influence of alcohol impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision to the residents, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260218090740
Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff member(s) worked while under the influence of alcohol.
On 1/28/26 at 12:30pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Leffall conducted an initial complaint visit to open and to deliver findings on above allegation. LPA met with Activities Coordinator (AC) Adeana Pearson. The Department conducted interviews with staff, and residents. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was distributed to Administrator which confirms signature of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260120101836
Sep 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not mitigating the spread of infectious outbreaks in the facility
On 09/16/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation and deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Administrator Wendy Lee and Lead Medication technician Elizabeth Eisenhauer. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, facility was toured, and copies of records were obtained. R1 tested positive for TB and placed on quarantine. Facility had infection control procedure was in placed. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250908142349
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 09/16/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an annual visit. LPA was greeted by Administrator Wendy Lee and granted entry into the facility. LPA introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted tour with A1. All 22 residents were present during inspection. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. The facility was observed clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards were observed inside or outside. Kitchen was toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed. Dishwasher was observed operational during inspection. Medications observed kept locked in medication cart in the facility office. MARs were reviewed and medications were checked. Cleaning solutions observed stored and locked under kitchen sink and under staff bathroom sink. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 38 degrees F and freezer temperature was maintained at 0 degrees F. Sharps observed locked in kitchen drawer. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility with a service date of 05/05/25. All bedrooms were observed to have required furnishings with adequate lighting and at comfortable temperature. Bathrooms were properly equipped. Bathrooms hot water temperature was tested at 112.8 degrees F in room 11, 110.4 degrees F in room 10, and 112.6 degrees F in room 8. LPA observed chemicals stored and locked in the laundry room and shed 1. CONTINUED TO Lic 809C Outside of the facility toured and observed to be free of debris. Adequate outdoor seating was observed to be available for residents. Designated smoking area observed available for residents. LPA observed fence gates on each side of the courtyard locked. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were tested and observed to be operational. A sample of resident and staff files were reviewed to have all the required documents. A deficiency is being cited on the attached 809D in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Exit Interview conducted. A copy of current Administrator Certificate was received. The following documents are requested and submitted to Fresno CCL by: 09/22/25. Forms requested: Lic 308, Lic 500, current liability insurance, Lic 610E, and current Administrator certificate. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025
Aug 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not meet the needs of a resident in care.
On 08/01/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation. LPA introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Administrator Wendy Lee and delivered complaint findings on the above allegation. During the complaint investigation, interviews were conducted, received copies of records, and the facility was toured. R1 confirmed R1 received MRI from hospital visit. Follow up appointments were scheduled. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, R1 received x-rays and MRI for resident’s injury with follow up appointments, therefore the preponderance evidences has not been met, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250724154728
Jun 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff cross contaminating resident’s food.
On 06/25/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to complaint investigation and deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Ashley Bell. The Department conducted interviews and toured the facility. Each residents’ food was placed in separate plates before serving. Residents with restricted diet or with food allergy are placed in separate plates. Food is prepared in sanitized area with specific cutting board for meat products and vegetables. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, the above allegations is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit Interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 25, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250624115141
Sep 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 09/24/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an annual visit. LPA was greeted by Licensee (L1) Anthony Barbato and granted entry into the facility. LPA introduce self and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted tour with L1. All 17 residents were present during inspection. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. The facility was observed clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards were observed inside or outside. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed. Medications observed kept locked in medication cart in the facility office. MARs were reviewed and medications was checked. Cleaning chemicals observed stored and locked under kitchen sink. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 38 degrees F and freezer temperature was maintained at -1 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 05/23/24. All bedrooms were observed to have required furnishings with adequate lighting and at comfortable temperature. Bathrooms were properly equipped. Bathroom hot water temperature was tested at 111.3 degrees F in room 11, 118.9 degrees F in room 8, 114.8 degrees F in room 5, and 106.1 degrees F in room 2. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were tested and observed to be operational. Washer and dryer was observed operational during inspection. LPA observed chemicals stored and lock in the laundry room. Outside of facility toured and observed to be free of debris. Adequate outside seatings were observed available for residents. A sample of resident and staff files were reviewed to have all the required documents. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. Exit Interview conducted. A copy of current Administrator Certificate was received. The following documents are requested and submitted to Fresno CCL by: 09/30/24. Forms requested: Lic 308, Lic 400, Lic 402, Lic 500, current liability insurance, and Lic 610E. A copy of this report was provided to Licensee, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Aug 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff made inappropriate comments towards a resident Staff yelled at a resident while in care Uncleared individual is posing as a risk to the residents Staff does not provide the residents with privacy
On 0815/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Facility Manager Ashley Bell. Staff and LPA attempted to reach Licensee Anthony Barbato. Administrator Kala Gibson was called via telephone. LPA delivered findings to Administrator via telephone and Facility Manager. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and records were reviewed. Based on interviews conducted, the allegations staff made inappropriate comments towards a resident, staff yelled at a resident while in care, an uncleared individual was at the facility and staff does not provided resident with privacy, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator via telephone and Facility Manager. A copy of this report was provided to the Facility Manager, whose signature on this report confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240502095656
Aug 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not comply with basic service requirements
On 0815/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Facility Manager Ashley Bell. Staff and LPA attempted to reach Licensee Anthony Barbato. Administrator Kala Gibson was called via telephone. LPA delivered findings to Administrator via telephone and Facility Manager. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews. A food bank organization was contacted and provided information to the residents at the facility. No resident had signed up and received any food assistances form the program. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted via telephone with Administrator and Facility Manager. A copy of this report was provided to the Facility Manager, whose signature on this report confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240503095428
Aug 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff left a resident soiled while in care Staff are not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident
On this date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang delivered findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee Representative Anthony Barbato. The Department conducted interviews, reviewed records, and toured the facility. Based on the interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations made by the LPA on the 12/18/2023 facility visit, the above allegations are Substantiated. R1 was observed soiled while in care. Facility staff did not ensure R2 received his medications to treat his insulin-dependent diabetes condition and did not monitor the resident’s glucose level, which resulted in the resident’s hospitalization and death. Citations were issued on complaint #24-AS-20231228152212 for care and supervision and appeal rights were provided. Exit interview was conducted. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231214090626
Aug 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure resident received medications as prescribed resulting in hospitalization. Staff left a resident soiled while in care.
On this date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang delivered findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Licensee Representative Anthony Barbato. The Department conducted interviews, reviewed records, and toured the facility. Based on the interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations made by the LPA on the 12/18/2023 facility visit, the above allegations are Substantiated. R1 was observed soiled while in care. Facility staff did not ensure R2 received his medications to treat his insulin-dependent diabetes condition and did not monitor the resident’s glucose level, which resulted in the resident’s hospitalization and death. Citations were issued on complaint #24-AS-20231228152212 and appeal rights were provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231220104001
Aug 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not monitor resident's glucose level resulting in death
The Department conducted interviews, reviewed records, and toured the facility. Based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed, the above allegation is Substantiated. Facility staff did not ensure R2 received his medications to treat his insulin-dependent diabetes condition and did not monitor the resident’s glucose level, which resulted in the resident’s hospitalization and death. Citation for care and supervision are issued on the attached 9099-D. The issuance of additional civil penalties is pending and currently under review. The details of additional civil penalties will be outlined in a future report to the facility, if any. Exit Interview was conducted and Appeal Rights were provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231228152212
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 3, 2024
Personnel Requirements - Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This was not met as evidenced by: Based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed, facility staff did not monitor R2’s glucose level. The facility staff also did not ensure R2 received his medications to treat his insulin-dependent diabetes condition. This resulted in R2’s hospitalization and death, which poses an immediate Health and Safety concern.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024
Plan of correction: POC addressed during NCC.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 3, 2024
Administrator - Qualifications and Duties - Knowledge of and ability to conform to the applicable laws, rules and regulations. This was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, Administrator did not ensure resident’s care needs were met, which poses an immediate Health and Safety concern.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024
Plan of correction: POC addressed during NCC.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 3, 2024
Basic Service - Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident and as indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, with those activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, bathing and assistance with taking prescribed medications… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, facility staff left resident soiled and failed to ensure resident received medications, which poses an immediate health and safety concern.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2024
Plan of correction: POC discussed during NCC.
Jul 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 07/30/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit based on record review of incident report submitted. LPA met with Staff Destiny Wood. Staff telephone called to Administrator Kala Gibson who stated unable to attend meeting. Administrator Assistant Ashley Bell arrived later during visit. The purpose of the visit is to address incident that occurred where S1 sold narcotic to R1. LPA reviewed records and conducted interviews with staff and resident. The information provide will be reviewed; a follow up case management will be conducted if necessary. Exit Interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator Assistant, whose signature confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024
Jul 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure first aid is provided for minor incidents that don't require medical treatment
On 07/17/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint inspection. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Assistant (AA) Ashley Bell. Administrator Kala Gibson was called and stated unable to attend meeting. LPA delivered findings to AA and to Administrator via telephone. During the course of the investigation, the department conduct interviews. Interviews conducted confirmed, S1 refuse to assist resident with first aid. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator Assistant, whose signature confirms received of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240715113659
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(j) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 22, 2024
In all facilities licensed for sixteen (16) persons or more, one or more employees shall be designated as having primary responsibility for assuring that each resident receives needed first aid and needed emergency medical services and for assisting residents as needed… This requirement was not met: Based on interviews conducted, it was confirmed, S1 refuse to assist resident with first aid which poses a potential health and safety and personal rights risk to the person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit steps and documents of how the facility will assist the resident with first aid to Fresno CCL office by POC due date 07/22/24.
Jun 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff forced a resident to bathe
On 06/11/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation and deliver complaint finding on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Administrator Kala Gibson. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, received copies of records, and toured the facility. Based on interviews that were conducted, S1 forces R1 to take showers. Based on interviews conductd, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240603113122
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 21, 2024
To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, S1 uses social force on R1 to take showers which poses a potential health and safety risk for the person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024
Plan of correction: All staff In-Service training on resident’s personal rights is to be completed. Staff rooster of attendance of in-service training and training materials is to be submitted to Fresno CCL by POC date 06/21/24.
Jun 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging residents medication
On 06/11/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Administrator Kala Gibson. During the course of the investigation, residents’ medications were audit and MARs were reviewed, medications audit showed staff did not administered R1 and R2 medications as directed by physician. Based on observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240307144719
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 12, 2024
Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and observation, R1 and R2 medications were not administered by staff as instructed by physician which poses an immediate health and safety risk for the person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit documents of steps the facility will take to ensure facility meets the regulation which will include auditing the MARS and medications to Fresno CCL office by POC due date 06/12/24. Licensee shall have all staff retrained Health-Related Services regulations 87465. Licensee will submit documentation of training topics which include process of administering medications with staff attendance rooster to the Fresno CCL office by 06/21/24.
Jun 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 06/11/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived to conduct an unannounced initial complaint investigation and met with Administrator Kala Gibson. LPA conducted case management-deficiency visit with Administrator. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility with Administrator. LPA observed bathroom door missing in shared bedroom. A Deficiency is being cited on the attached Lic 809D in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 14, 2024
The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews conducted, at 12:01PM, Room 7 a shared room, was missing a bathroom door and has not been replace for a while which poses a potential health and safety risk for the person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall ensure the facility is in good repaired at all times. Licensee shall ensure that there is a door to the bathroom in Room 7 by POC due date. Proof shall be submitted to the department by the POC due date of 06/14/24.
Apr 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 04/04/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct case management visit for the purpose of checking on the health and safety of the residents in care. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Kala Gibson. During today's inspection, LPA conducted a tour of the facility. All passage ways were clear from obstructions. Residents were observed in sitting in dining area, smoking in the courtyard,and in bedrooms. No deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2024
Mar 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident with an object Staff are not treating resident with dignity and respect Staff did not ensure the facility was free from odors
On 03/08/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings on the above allegations. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and met with Administrator Kala Gibson. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, reviewed records, and conducted interviews. R1 confirmed staff did not hit resident with any object and staff did not mistreat resident. LPA toured the facility and observed designated smoking area outdoor. Facility was observed free from odor. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this report confirms receipt of this report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 8, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240229134130
Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff refused to take resident to the hospital. Residents did not receive medications as prescribed.
On 02/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and delivered complaint findings on the above allegations. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Tasha Duncan. Administrator Kala Gibson was called and unable to attend meeting. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews. It was confirmed that R1 had requested to be taken to the hospital and the staff refused for the resident to go. R1’s medications and Medication Administration Record (MAR) were reviewed and observed resident’s medication were not administered to resident as prescribed on multiple occasions. Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is being cited on the attached Lic 9099D. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to staff, whose signature confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240108182624
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(16) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2024
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities To receive or reject medical care or other services. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, the resident had requested to go to the hospital and the facility staff refused to call for the resident to be taken to the hospital, which poses an immediate health and safety risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit a written statement of the understanding the regulation and how it will be met by POC due date 02/13/24. In-service training for all staff will be completed for “Personal Rights.” In-service training documents with staff attendance shall be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by POC due date 02/26/24.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2024
If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration…(2)… the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed and observation, R1’s medication and MARs were reviewed and observed that staff did not administer medication: Lidocaine 5% patch at 7AM for multiple dates in February 2024, on 2/9/24 7PM and 2/11/24 7PM. Medication Morphine 15mg was not administer on 2/9/24 8PM and 2/10/24 8PM. Morphine 15mg was administered on 2/10/24 and 2/11/24 after medications were changed on 1/29/24 to Morphine 30 mg. Medication Morphine 30 mg was not administer on 2/10/24, 2/11/24 8AM, and 2/12/24 8AM. Medication Valproic Acid 250 mg was not administered on 2/5/24 12PM and 2/11/24 8PM. Diclofenac Sodium 1% gel was not administered on 2/6/24 8AM and 2/7/24 8AM. Several medications not being administered to R1 poses an immediate health and safety risks to the person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit a written statement detailing steps the facility will take to ensure the requirements of Health-Related Services are met. Statement shall be submitted to Fresno CCL office by POC due date 02/13/24. All staff will be retrained on Health-Related Services regulations which includes medication pass and medication checks. Training documents and record of staff attendance will be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by 02/26/24.
Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is not providing a healthful environment for residents in care.
On 02/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to delivered complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Tasha Duncan. Administrator Kala Gibson was called and unable to attend meeting. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and toured the facility. LPA observed mold in the resident’s bathroom shower floor and wall. Based on observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6 is being cited on the attached Lic 9099D. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to staff, whose signature confirms receipt of this report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240104103038
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2024
Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, in resident’s room 11, mold was observed in the bathroom shower floor and wall which poses a potential Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to the resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall ensure there are no molding in resident’s bathroom shower by deep cleaning or replace shower. Proof shall be submitted to Fresno CCL office by POC due date 2/26/24.
Dec 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 12/18/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management - Deficiencies inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Administrator Kala Gibson. The purpose of today’s visit is to address incident report and SOC 341 that the department received on 12/12/23. It was reported that on 12/10/23, staff 1 (S1) slapped and scolded R1. LPA conducted interview with Administrator, reviewed submitted photos and records which confirm S1 had slapped R1’s arm multiple times leaving bruises on R1’s arm the next day. S1 demanded R1 to go to her room and scolded R1 that grabbing S1’s hand was not okay. A deficiency is being cited, per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, see attached 809D. Exit Interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 19, 2023
87468.1(a)(3) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement has not been met by: Based on interviews conducted, reviews of photos and records, on 12/10/23 S1 had slapped R1 on the hand multiple times leaving R1 bruises on the forearm. S1 scold and demanded the resident to go to the resident’s room which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2023
Plan of correction: S1 was terminated on 12/12/23. All staff have been retrained in-service training on 12/13/23. In-Service training on elderly abuse including emotional, physical, mental, and verbal. Rooster of staff attendance and training documents was received. POC cleared.
Oct 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
On 10/04/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang conducted an announced Pre-licensing and Component III inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Licensee Anthony Barbato and Administrator Kala Gibson. The facility is 11 resident rooms. Fire clearance was granted for 22 Ambulatory for total of 22 capacity. All two residents were present during this inspection. LPA toured the facility with Licensee and Administrator. Facility temperature is at a comfortable temperature. Common areas were furnished and had adequate seating and lighting available. Fire extinguishers was observed and has a service date of 07/26/23. Medications were kept locked in the office inaccessible to residents. Kitchen was toured and observed to have dishes, plate, and utensils. Refrigerator temperature maintained at 36 degrees F and freezer temperature at -2 degree F. LPA observed a 2-day supply of perishable foods and a 7 day supply of non-perishable foods. Knives were observed to be locked and secured in kitchen drawer. Cleaning supplies and chemicals were observed to be in a locked under kitchen sink. Bedrooms were observed to have required furnishings. Bathrooms are observed with securely fastened grab bars in shower and non-skid mat. Bathrooms were observed to be operational. Hot water measured at degrees F range between 106 to 108.3 degrees F in residents’ bathroom. Outside of facility toured and observe free of debris. LPA observed adequate outdoor seatings available for residents. LPA observed an extra supply of bed linens. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were observed to be operational during this inspection. First aid kit was observed and contained all required items. Resident records were reviewed. LPA observed resident Admission Agreements, Physician Reports, and Pre-Appraisal. A sample of staff records were reviewed. Staff records were observed to have a criminal record clearance. Facility phone number 760-376-6733. Component III was conducted during today's pre-licensing visit. I have found that the applicant has met all pre-licensing requirements. LPA will submit documentation to CAB in Sacramento for final review prior to license being issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Shared / companion roomsReported no
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Common areasCommunal dining room
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Room typesShared Rooms · STUDIO
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itSocial Clubs
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Faith, culture & language
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Transport for group outings
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Kern County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
The Burlington
Wofford Heights · Mid-size home · 3.8 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Typical in Kern County
High Desert Senior Living
Inyokern · Small home · 32 mi away
$3,500 a month to start · Typical in Kern County
The Pointe at Summit Hills
Bakersfield · Large community · 38 mi away
$4,695 a month to start · Listed by the home
A & M Assisted Living
Bakersfield · Small home · 38 mi away
$3,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Shanti Homes 1
Bakersfield · Small home · 38 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Pine Haven
Bakersfield · Small home · 38 mi away
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate