Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Healing Pines Senior Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·Winnetka, California

LicensedLicence #197610911
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Typical starting rate$5,000 a monthTypical in Los Angeles County · likely $3,650–$6,850
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 23, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 31, 2026CDSS inspection record

Healing Pines Senior Living is a small care home in Winnetka — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Healing Pines Senior Living

Is Healing Pines Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Healing Pines Senior Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Healing Pines Senior Living been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is Healing Pines Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Healing Pines Senior Living cost?

$5,000 a month to start is typical in Los Angeles County, likely $3,650–$6,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 218 small homes publish in Los Angeles County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Healing Pines Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: we have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Healing Pines Senior Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can Healing Pines Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Healing Pines Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “HEALING PINES SENIOR LIVING LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of August 30, 2026.
  • License #197610911. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Healing Pines Senior Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
  • 5 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 31, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM 3. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE OF SIX (6).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Likely $3,650–$6,850

From homes this size in Los Angeles County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $3,650–$6,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,650–$6,850

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 218 small homes publish in Los Angeles County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,950
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,550–$9,800
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverWe have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 218 small homes publish in Los Angeles County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Where it is

  • 19733 Hemmingway St, Winnetka, CA 91306Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

A map position is not on file for this address.

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2026, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 23, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2026
State visits
5
Most recent visit
August 31, 2026
Occupied · July 23, 2026 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 8, 2026 to July 23, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.

The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documents

20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure the facility is clean and sanitary.

On 7/23/26 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Staff/Caregiver Ronny Tjhung, introduced herself by showing the Department badge and gained access to the facility. LPA contacted the Administrator over the phone and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of investigation, LPA requested staff and residents’ rosters. At approximately 9:15am LPA accompanied Staff 1 (S1), conducted physical plant tour throughout the facility to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. At 9:40am LPA requested copies of Admission Agreement, Appraisal Needs and Services, Physician Report, copy of CSMDR/MAR, and reviewed other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. LPA also conducted interviews with the Administrator, two (2) staff members, six (6) out of six (6) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not ensure the facility is clean and sanitary. To investigate the allegation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, staff, and residents. The administrator denied the allegation and stated that the facility is cleaned daily, and that hygiene items and cleaning supplies are maintained and readily available for residents. Administrator further denied ever refusing residents food or any prescribed medications. Staff members interviewed also denied refusing residents’ food, medications, and stated that the residents receive meals, medications, and hygiene supplies as needed. Staff walked with LPA throughout the facility and showed the locations where hygiene supplies, including soap, toilet paper, personal hygiene items, and cleaning supplies are stored and maintained for residents’ use. During the visit LPA inspected the house, including all residents’ bedrooms, common / living areas, kitchen, and bathrooms. LPA observed the facility to be generally clean, sanitary, organized, and in good repair with no objectionable odors or evidence of unsanitary conditions. LPA inspected two of two bathrooms and observed soap and toilet paper available in each restroom. The LPA also observed additional stock of hygiene supplies stored inside the supply closet located in the hallway. Furthermore, LPA interviewed six (6) out of six (6) residents residing in a facility. Five (5) out of six (6) residents denied concerns regarding the cleanliness and sanitary condition of the facility. Residents further stated they have never observed the bathrooms without soap or toilet paper and confirmed that hygiene items are available when needed. LPA inspected the kitchen and food storage areas and observed the adequate supply of food, including at least two days supply of perishable foods and seven days’ supply of non-perishable foods available for residents. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and evidence obtained during the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff did not ensure the facility is clean and sanitary. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260721085726
Jul 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually abused while in care. Staff did not meet residents' showering needs. Staff is withholding residents' belongings. Staff speaks inappropriately to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced initial visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with staff member (S2), Liana Gafikyan, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the physical plant at 8:20 AM. At 8:35 AM, LPA interviewed the administrator (S1) by telephone, one (1) staff member, and six (6) out of six (6) residents. At 10:30 AM, LPA conducted a records review and requested copies of the following documents: Staff Roster (LIC 9020), Personnel Report (LIC 500), residents' physician's reports, admission agreements, inventories of personal belongings, staff training records, and other pertinent documents. Allegation: Resident was sexually abused while in care. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was sexually abused while in care through the use of electricity. Staff interviews revealed that staff had never witnessed or observed any sexual abuse, neglect, physical abuse, or verbal abuse involving residents in care. During resident interviews, the residents denied the allegation and stated that the facility provides a safe environment and that they are treated with respect and dignity. During an interview with R1 in Bedroom #1 at 8:35 AM, R1 stated that they had never been sexually or physically abused while in care at the facility. Based on interviews conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff did not meet residents' showering needs. It was alleged that staff did not meet R1's showering needs. Staff interviews revealed that R1 receives showers two (2) to three (3) times per week, or more frequently if requested or needed. Resident interviews revealed that they shower two (2) to three (3) times per week, they are able to shower independently, and reported no concerns regarding the facility showering needs. During today's visit, LPA observed staff assisting R1 with dyeing their hair and providing a shower at 11:00 AM. LPA observed all residents to be well-groomed, appropriately dressed, and without any noticeable odor. Based on interviews and observations conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff is withholding residents' belongings. It was alleged that staff were withholding R1's belongings, including clothing and shoes. Staff interviews revealed that staff have not taken, withheld, or stolen R1's belongings or the belongings of any other resident. Staff further stated that no staff at the facility would steal or withhold residents' personal belongings. LPA observed R1's shoes on the floor beside their bed in bedroom #1. Clothing was observed in R1's closet and dresser, and additional clothing was being laundered during the visit. Resident interviews revealed that they had not experienced or observed any personal belongings being withheld, missing, or stolen. Continue to LIC 9099-C A review of R1's Personal Property and Valuables form did not include any entries for shoes or clothing. S2 stated and showed LPA that they recently purchased additional clothing for R1. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff speaks inappropriately to resident. It was alleged that staff spoke inappropriately to R1 by using derogatory names. Resident interviews consistently indicated that staff treat residents with respect and dignity. Staff denied being rude or disrespectful toward residents. During an interview with R1 in Bedroom #1 at 8:35 AM, R1 stated that they overheard staff making derogatory remarks but clarified that the remarks were not directed toward them. Based on the information obtained through interviews and the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff interacted with or spoke inappropriately to residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260714120758
Jul 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mishandled a resident's medication.

At approximately 8:20 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at the facility in response to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with the staff designee (S#2) and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:31 AM, LPA spoke with the administrator by phone regarding the reason for the visit. At approximately 8: 50 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents are protected. At 8:40 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information, which include, but are not limited to, Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, LIC 500 (staff roster), LIC 9020 (resident roster), needs and service plan, and relevant documents to the investigation. LPA interviewed the Administrator over the phone, staff designee who are in the facility, and four (4) out of four (4) residents. Allegation: Staff mishandled a resident's medication. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated To investigate the allegation, License Program Analysts (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda reviewed all of the residents' Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR). Records reveal that medications were administered in a timely manner, that no medications were missing for the residents, and that everything is accounted for. LPA observe S2 knocking on bedroom #4 for R1 insulin before serving breakfast and was ignored at 8:25 AM and 9:00 AM. R1 eventually came out of their bedroom at 11:00 AM and requested for his insulin. LPA interviewed residents on 7.8.2026, and it was revealed that residents do not have concerns about being managed by facility staff. Interviews with staff revealed that all medications are provided to clients as prescribed. Therefore, based on interviews and a review of records, and due to a lack of supporting evidence, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given to staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260702083316
Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 3/26/2026 at 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan conducted a Pre-Licensing Inspection with the Administrator Ghukasyan Kristine. This is a Change of Ownership Application from facility #197610320 to #197610911 to operate an Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE). A Change in Ownership (CHOW) Application to operate the RCFE was received by Community Care Licensing (CCL) on 9/19/2025. A fire clearance was approved on December 30th, 2025, for five (5) non-ambulatory residents, and one (1) Bedridden resident for bedroom # 3. Facility has Hospice waivers granted for six (6) residents. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors are hard wired and inter-connected; they were tested and are operational. The facility has two (2) fire extinguishers that were serviced on 3/14/2026 and will be located on the kitchen wall and in the hallway. A tour of the physical plant was initiated at approximately 10:45am and the following was observed: KITCHEN: The facility has a Kitchen area that is equipped with a refrigerator, gas stove, microwave oven and sink. There were adequate supplies of two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of nonperishable food, dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6) residents. Knives and other sharps were observed locked inside the kitchen cabinets and chemicals observed stored inside locked cabinet under the sink. COMMON AREAS: These include living room and a dining room. LPA observed the area was generally clean and organized. The living room was equipped with furniture, a television, tables and chairs. There is fireplace in the living room which is blocked and not accessible to residents. The dining area has a dining table to accommodate six (6) residents. There were no visible immediate hazards. The facility has comfortable temperature which was measured at 10:55am to be 70 degrees F. Continue on LIC809-C BEDROOMS: The facility has four (4) bedrooms, and all bedrooms are designated for residents' use. All residents' bedrooms were observed to be nicely furnished with beds, nightstands, lamps, chairs, dresser, bedding and linen. The bedrooms have sufficient lighting and closet space. Additional fresh linen is available inside the linen cabinet located in the hallway. Bedrooms #1 and #2 are for non-ambulatory residents and bedrooms #3 is for bedridden only. BATHROOMS: The facility has two (2) bathrooms, both designated for residents’ and staff use. All bathrooms were observed to have the proper fixtures, grab bars, non-skid mats, trash cans with closed lids, paper towels/ hand dryer and washing hands signs. The hot water delivered in the bathrooms measured at 11:10am to be at 110.1 degrees. Bathroom #1 is located in the hallway next to bedroom #2 and bathroom #2 is inside bedroom #3. GARAGE: LPA observed that there is a garage located on the premises and was informed by the licensee that they recently received approval to convert the structure into an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The licensee stated that the required documentation and notification related to this approval will be submitted to the department for review. LAUNDRY ROOM: The washer and dryer is located in the hallway, inside a separate laundry area. Laundry chemicals are always locked and under supervision inside a separate cabinet. Client Files: From 11:05am to 12:00pm LPA conducted a file review of all client records to ensure compliance of licensing forms. Clients’ files are complete and kept locked inside the kitchen cabinet. Staff Files: Staff files are also kept inside a locked kitchen cabinet. From 12:00pm to 12:20pm LPA conducted staff file review, files were complete with all documents and training certificates. MEDICATIONS: Medications are kept locked inside the kitchen cabinet. At approximately 12:15pm to 12:45pm LPA observed each centrally stored prescription and PRN medication has been logged in the medications log with proper documentation from the clients’ doctor. All medications are properly labeled and checked for expiration dates. First Aid and the new manual available and locked inside the kitchen cabinet along with medications. LPA observed the First-aid has all proper items and is current. Continue on LIC809-C SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The driveway, passageways and entrance to the home were clear of obstruction. The backyard of the facility is properly fenced, has a patio and backyard furniture to accommodate six (6) residents. There is no pool or body of water in the premises. There are two (2) exit gates on both sides of the property, LPA checked gates were unlocked and easily accessible. LPA observed the facility is clean, safe, sanitary and odorless. All window screens were in good repair. Auditory signals were installed on exit doors and operational. All passageways were free of obstruction. In addition to the Pre-Licensing inspection, a Component III power point presentation was also held. Pursuant to Title 22, CA Code of Regulations, the facility's physical environment appears to be compliant and ready for licensure. CAB will be advised. An emergency exit plan/sketch along with other posting requirements were available in the hallway next to the entrance. No deficiency cited on today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered to the Licensee/Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026
Feb 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 3 Method: Telephone call with CAB COMP II Participants: Ghukasyan, Kristin On 2/9/2026, the applicant/administrator participated in COMP II at CAB via telephone call with analyst at CAB. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified by confirming driver’s license number. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. Applicant and administrator were advised to email/fax signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID to CAB. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in Los Angeles County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County