Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Haven's House of Assisted Living
Small home·Licensed for 6·Fairfield, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 11, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitSeptember 16, 2026CDSS inspection record
Haven's House of Assisted Living is a small care home in Fairfield — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Haven's House of Assisted Living
Is Haven's House of Assisted Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Haven's House of Assisted Living licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Haven's House of Assisted Living been cited?
6 Type A and 5 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 35 state visits over the same years.
Is Haven's House of Assisted Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Haven's House of Assisted Living cost?
$4,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,900–$5,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size across Solano County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,721 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,550 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Haven's House of Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by April Thomas, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Northbay Medical Center is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Haven's House of Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Haven's House of Assisted Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “HAVEN'S HOUSE OF ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #486804012. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to April Thomas, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 35 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 6 Type A and 5 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 35 state visits in that period.
- 8 complaints and 12 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGES 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR ONE (1) AMBULATORY AND FIVE (5) NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR TWO (2) RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,800a month to start
Likely $3,900–$5,900
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,800a month
Likely $3,900–$6,100
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,800likely $3,900–$5,900
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$6,100
- $4,800
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,600–$9,200
- $6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
9 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$5,800.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Bright Minds Residential CareFairfield · 1.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hacienda Del Mar Care HomeSuisun City · 4.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cogir of VacavilleVacaville · 8.7 mi · Mid-size home$3,795Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Five Acres at Leisure Town NorthVacaville · 11 mi · Mid-size home$4,550Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Olive HouseNapa · 11 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Country InnNapa · 12 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Nazareth Rose Garden of NapaNapa · 12 mi · Mid-size home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- C&F Senior Care Home American CanyonAmerican Canyon · 13 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Stayman Estates - West PuebloNapa · 15 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 2769 Bradbury Way, Fairfield, CA 94534Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 28 documents for this home, and its records count 35 visits since 2022. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on September 11, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 35
- Most recent visit
- September 16, 2026
- Occupied · September 11, 2026 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 8 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 5, 2022 to September 11, 2026. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 8 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations6typical 0
- Type B citations5typical 0
- Substantiated allegations12typical 0
- Total complaints8typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 18 of 28 documents
Sep 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility retianed resident with a prohibited health condition
At approximately 09:45 AM, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Victoria Bertozzi and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deniz arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator, April Thomas. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegation was investigated: “Facility retained resident with a prohibited health condition.” The complaint alleged that the facility retained a resident with a prohibited health condition. The investigation alleged that the resident was frail, bedbound, had bed sores, and required dialysis. However, there was insufficient evidence to establish that the resident's condition met the definition of a prohibited health condition under applicable licensing requirements or that the facility retained the resident in violation of those requirements. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099 page... Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Executive Director. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Continued from LIC9099-A page... A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9099D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Executive Director/Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260618160333
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 21, 2026
87468.2(a)(2) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities...:(2) To have their records and personal information remain confidential and to approve their release, except as authorized by law. This regulation is not met by evidence by; Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the licensee received and held R1’s Social Security checks and forwarded the checks to R1’s family member, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2026
Plan of correction: The licensee shall submit a signed declaration stating that the facility and its staff do not receive, hold, or manage Social Security checks or other personal funds on behalf of residents, unless otherwise authorized. The declaration shall include the date and signature of the licensee and must be submitted to CCL by plan of correction due date 09/21/2026.
Aug 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 08/27/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management - other visit and met with Licensee/Administrator April Thomas. The purpose of this visit was to discuss a recent fire clearance granting the facility a secured perimeter. Licensee shall submit a written request to Community Care Licensing (CCL) for a waiver to be granted allowing a secured perimeter. Along with this waiver request, Licensee shall submit signed letters from each resident in care and/or their responsible party of their understanding and consent to reside in a facility with a secured perimeter. All paperwork shall be submitted no later then 8/31/2026 by Close of Business Day. Administrator stated paper copy of fire clearance has not arrived and will forward to CCL when available. Administrator also stated they will not be locking the gate until paper copy of fire clearance arrives. LPA provided Administrator with Technical Assistance on the Health and Safety Code regarding Secured Perimeters. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2026
Aug 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 08/20/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ali Deniz arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management–deficiency visit. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator April Thomas. At the time of the visit, the facility had six residents and two staff members present. During the visit, LPA inspected the facility’s exterior exit doors/perimeter fence gates. LPA observed that one exterior exit fence gate was unlocked and a second exterior exit fence gate was locked. Licensee stated that her husband had mistakenly closed and locked the gate a few minutes prior to LPA’s arrival. LPA discussed with the Licensee/Administrator the requirement that the licensee shall ensure the facility’s fire clearance includes approval for locked exterior doors and/or locked perimeter fence gates. LPA advised the Licensee/Administrator to remove the lock from the exterior exit gate to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. LPA further advised the Licensee/Administrator that if the facility wishes to maintain a locked perimeter fence gate, the licensee must obtain the required approval prior to locking the exterior exit gate(s). Licensee/Administrator acknowledged the information and stated an understanding of the requirement. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026
Jul 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Physical Abuse. Financial Abuse.
On 07/27/2026, an office meeting was conducted at the Santa Rosa Regional Office. The following individuals were present in the meeting: Regional Manager (RM), Carla Nuti-Martinez, Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Bethany Moellers, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Ali Deniz, and Licensee/Administrator April Thomas. During the meeting LPA was able to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegation was investigated, “Physical Abuse and Financial Abuse.” • Physical Abuse The complaint alleged that the Licensee physically abused residents. The Reporting Party (RP) stated that while assisting Resident 1 (R1) with care, the Licensee bent R1’s arm, causing R1 to state, “Ow April, you are hurting me.” Continued on LIC9099-C page... Substantiated Continued from LIC9099 page... RP further reported that the Licensee waved a closed fist in front of R1’s face and that R1 disclosed the Licensee hits residents. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with residents and staff, made observations, and reviewed available documentation. Two staff members reported that the Licensee has been rough with residents and frequently yells at residents and staff. On 07/24/2026, LPA and LPM observed the Licensee speaking loudly to residents and arguing with residents regarding food. During an interview, a resident reported to LPA that the Licensee pushed them. Additionally, during an interview with LPM, the Licensee stated that she grabbed a resident by the wrist and pried the resident’s fingers from a doorway. Based on interviews, observations, and the Licensee’s statements, the allegation is Substantiated. • Financial Abuse The complaint alleged that the Licensee misused residents’ financial resources, including EBT benefits, IHSS funds, and resident checks. The Reporting Party (RP) stated that R1 reported the Licensee was taking R1’s checks and that although R1 had received six checks and never received the funds. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with residents and staff. Interviews confirmed that the Licensee maintains control of resident checks until rent payments are received. Interviews also indicated that the Licensee utilizes residents’ EBT benefits and IHSS funds to subsidize facility expenses. Based on interviews and review of available information, the allegation is Substantiated. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the allegations are substantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9099D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Executive Director/Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Continued from LIC9099-A page... During the initial visit on 05/06/2026, LPA observed that all resident bedding was in compliance with regulatory requirements. LPA also observed additional bedding supplies stored in the facility closet. During an interview, the Licensee stated that the facility provides and cleans resident bedding as needed. LPA was unable to obtain additional information regarding this allegation. Based on observations and interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Executive Director. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260505083955
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 28, 2026
87468.1(a)(3) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a)(3) To be free from punishment,humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations made, the facility failed to ensure resident’s rights and protection from abuse. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee agrees to complete a self-certification on physical abuse, financial abuse, and resident rights. The Licensee will submit proof of completion of the self-certification to Community Care Licensing by the Plan of Correction (POC) due date of 07/28/2026.
Jul 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
On 07/27/2026, an office meeting was conducted at the Santa Rosa Regional Office. The following individuals were present in the meeting: Regional Manager (RM), Carla Nuti-Martinez, Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Bethany Moellers, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Ali Deniz, and Licensee/Administrator April Thomas. The purpose of today’s meeting was to address recurrent areas of concerns identified by the Department. The following areas were discussed during today's meeting: · Substantiated Complaint Investigation: Complaint 21-AS-20260505083955 and 21-AS-20260618160333 · Administrator Qualifications Facility currently has two complaint investigations that are still being investigated: Complaint 21-AS-20260505083955 and Complaint 21-AS-20260618160333. These investigations involve concerns with personal rights, Facility retained resident with a prohibited health condition, Physical Abuse, Financial Abuse, and Facility is not provided required bedding. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the Licensee/Administrator failed to demonstrate knowledge of and the ability to conform to applicable laws, rules, and regulations. The investigation determined that the Licensee handling the resident in a rough manner and engaged in financial relation by improperly withholding residents' checks and utilizing residents' benefits for facility operations. These actions constitute violations of resident rights and applicable licensing regulations, demonstrating the Administrator's failure to comply with Title 22 regulations. (See 809-D Page…) LIC809-C page... Continued from LIC809 page... During the meeting CCL requested in the video recording audio need to be turned of in the facility and plan about creating Lock Secured Perimeter by 07/28/2026. Facility is Non-Compliance Plan with an end date of May 2028 and has been referred to TSP. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9099D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Executive Director/Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 28, 2026
87405(d)(2) The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d) (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform to the applicable laws, rules and regulations. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and the Licensee's documented practices, the Licensee failed to perform the duties and responsibilities of the facility administrator as required by Title 22, Which poses immediate risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee agrees to complete a self-certification on administrator qualifications and duties. The Licensee will submit proof of completion of the self-certification to Community Care Licensing by the Plan of Correction (POC) due date of 07/28/2026.
Jul 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not meet resident care needs. Facility did not maintain adequate staff. Facility did not seek timely medical care.
At approximately 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Victoria Bertozzi and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deniz arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator, April Thomas. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegation was investigated, “- Facility did not meet resident care needs, Facility did not maintain adequate staff, and Facility did not seek timely medical care.” The complaint alleged that the facility was operating with insufficient staffing, resulting in residents not receiving adequate care and supervision. The Reporting Party (RP) stated that there was only staff member caring for seven residents, including a resident who required a two-person assist with a Hoyer lift. RP further alleged that a resident R2 sustained injuries from a fall was not provided timely medical care. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Substantiated Continued from LIC9099 page... Facility did not maintain adequate staff – During the initial investigation, LPA observed one staff member on duty while the facility was caring for six residents, including two residents who required two-person assistance with Hoyer lift transfers. The Administrator confirmed that only one staff member was present during portions of the day and that additional assistance was not available until later in the evening. Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff to meet the care and supervision needs of the residents. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the allegation is Substantiated. Facility did not seek timely medical care – Per record review of the facility's incident report dated 05/04/2026 indicated that Resident R2 sustained a fall on 04/26/2026. The facility did not seek immediate medical evaluation following the incident. Instead, per the special incident report, the hospice nurse was contacted the following day, and a physician's appointment was scheduled for 05/06/2026. During the investigation, LPA also obtained photographs documenting visible bruising sustained by R2. Based on the available evidence, the facility failed to seek timely medical care for Resident R2 following the fall. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the allegation is Substantiated. Facility did not meet resident care needs – LPA observed that two residents required two-person assistance with Hoyer lift transfers. Due to insufficient staffing, the facility was unable to consistently provide the level of assistance necessary to safely meet residents' care and supervision needs. Additionally, resident interviews indicated concerns regarding lack of the quality of care provided. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the allegation is substantiated. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the allegations are substantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9099D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Executive Director/Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Continued LIC9099-A page... Facility did not administer resident medication as prescribed – The complaint alleged that the facility resident records were falsified, and prescribed medication was not refilled as requested. During the investigation, the Administrator stated that the resident refused to attend a scheduled physician's appointment. Record review confirmed that Resident R1 had a prescription for the medication in question. Resident R1 stated that the facility failed to schedule the physician's appointment; however, LPA did not obtain sufficient evidence to verify that the facility failed to administer the resident's medication as prescribed. Therefore, the allegation could not be substantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Executive Director. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260429143325
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 25, 2026
(c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring the following: (4) There is an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident's ... care needs as identified... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs observation and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet residents care needs which poses a immdadiate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee has hired at least two additional staff. Licensee agrees to provide proof of training and an LIC 500 showing sufficient staffing to ensure staffing is adequate to meet residents needs during the in-person meeting at the Santa Rosa Regional Office on Monday, July 27, 2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87654(g) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 25, 2026
87465(g) Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services - 9-1-1 shall be telephoned immediately if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health, including an apparent life-threatening medical crisis. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, interviews and record review it was determined that staff failed to seek medical attention in a timely manner for R3 which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to hold an in-service training with all staff regarding policy and procedures for seeking medical attention in a timely manner as incidents and/or observations arise. Proof of training to be provided to CCL during the in-person meeting at the Santa Rosa Regional Office on Monday, July 27, 2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 27, 2026
87411 Personnel Requirements - General:(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident care needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed, interviews conducted, Licensee did not ensure sufficient staff were present to meet resident needs. This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to ensure facility has sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents in care. Licensee to submit updated LIC500 to show care giving staffing levels needs the residents. LIC500 to be brought in for the in-person meeting at the Santa Rosa Regional Office on Monday, July 27, 2026.
Jul 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 07/24/2026 Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Victoria Bertozzi and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Ali Deniz conducted a case management visit. LPM and LPA met with Licensee, April Thomas. Case management visit is being conducted to address concerns revealed during the complaint investigation. During facility visit, LPM Bertozzi overheard the Licensee and Staff having a loud discussion regarding cleaning of the facility. The conversation sounded argumentative in nature to the LPM resulting in the LPM requested that the individuals reduce the volume of their voice. During a discussion regarding a former resident who bruised easily, Licensee indicated that the resident bruised when grabbed by the wrist. Licensee showed LPM by grabbing their left wrist. Licensee then stated that resident would need grab the doorway and staff had to pry their fingers. Licensee went on to explain that resident wanted to walk down the street but it was unsafe so Licensee would have to pull them back. LPM explained that resident's may leave if they choose, accompanied by a staff, which is why the facility must be staff appropriately, explaining that resident's may not be restrained. Licensee then stated that she and the LPM will have to "agree to disagree" to which LPM responded that no, grabbing or restraining a resident is a personal rights violation. Continued on LIC809C At or around 12:00pm, LPM Bertozzi arrived in the kitchen so see what was being offered for lunch. LPM was looking in the refrigerator and observed multiple half sandwiches that said "PB&J" and "P" and were dated 7/24/2026. April explained that those sandwiches should be in the "Community Fridge" located just outside of the kitchen and explained they were a snack. April eventually moved those sandwiches to the community fridge. LPM asked again what was for lunch and Licensee stated that they are going to have teriyaki chicken and then showed LPM frozen dinners in the community fridge. LPM then asked what was for dinner and Licensee said she hadn’t decided yet and it would be spaghetti or hamburgers. She then went to her garage apartment and returned with thawed hamburger meat. LPM asked the Licensee if she ate the food in the facility fridge and she said they all shared food. She then proceeded to go to her apartment and get lunchmeat, April and another staff then began heating up the frozen dinners. I then overheard Licensee ask a resident what they wanted and the resident said salad. Licensee listed the items made in a already made salad. The resident didn’t want that all the ingredients in the pre-made salad so opted for a peanut butter sandwich that the Licensee offered. LPM intervened and ask the resident what they liked on their salad. LPM then offered for resident to look in the fridge. When the resident and LPM went to walk in the kitchen, the Licensee said the resident couldn’t go in kitchen. LPM told the Licensee that the resident could go in the kitchen and opened the fridge. Licensee then told the resident not to touch anything. The resident chose their salad items and Licensee made the a salad. Review of facility Plan of Operation showed that meal times are at 8:00am, 12:00 noon and 5:00pm. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9099D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 25, 2026
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and observation with Licensee, they have conducted physical redirection of at least one resident, This poses an immediate Personal Rights risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026
Plan of correction: The licensee agreed to submit a self-certified declaration stating that all resident personal rights regulations have been reviewed with facility staff. Licensee shall submit the declaration as proof of correction to Community Care Licensing (CCL) by the Plan of Correction (POC) due date 07/25/2026.The licensee also agreed to ensure that all residents' personal rights are protected.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87468.2 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 25, 2026
87468.2 Additional Personal Rights... (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated... To be served food of the quality and quantity necessary to meet their nutritional needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, record review, and observations, LPA determined that the Licensee failed to provide meals at scheduled times and failed to meet the residents' dietary needs. This poses an immediate Personal Rights risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee to ensure that meals are served at appropriate times and in a timely manner as per regulations. Licensee to submit a food service menu showing facility schedule of meal times and meals served. Submit POC by due date of 07/25/2026.
Jun 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ali Deniz conducted a case management regarding incident reports involving resident elopement. LPA met with Licensee, April thomas. Case management visit is being conducted to get more information on incident reports CCL agency recently received (05/06/2026 and 05/24/2026) from the facility. There were two (2) elopement reported to CCL Agency first one submitted on 05/08/2026 which occurred on 05/06/2026 and second incident report submitted on on 06/01 /2026 which occurred on 05/24/2026. In the second incident the neighbor called the police and brought her back. R1 had no injuries, and was is back in the community shortly after. Resident R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and according to medical assessment exhibits wandering behavior. LPA had a discussion about staffing conditions in the facility. Licensee stated they are still working on hiring new staff members. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC809-D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(d) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 5, 2026
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia:(d) The licensee shall ensure that the facility has an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits on exterior doors and perimeter fence gates accessible to those residents who may be at risk for elopement, as defined in Section 87101, Definitions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, Licensee did not ensure staff were aware when resident left the building without assistance. This poses an immediate Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to ensure elopement plan; and address frequency of awol drills for staff. In addition, to conduct staff training regarding elopment and wandering behaviors. Proof of training with participants signature to be submittet Community Care Licensing by plan of correction due date 06/05/2026
May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
On 05/19/2026, a Non-Compliance meeting was conducted at the Santa Rosa Regional Office. The following individuals were present in the meeting: Regional Manager (RM), Carla Nuti-Martinez, Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Victoria Bertozzi, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Ali Deniz, Jill Nakagawa and Licensee/Administrator April Thomas. The purpose of today’s meeting was to address recurrent areas of concerns identified by the Department. On 10/23/2025, Facility received an initial consultation with Department's Technical Support Program (TSP) on the following topics: Record Keeping Medication Management Incident Reporting TSP completed their final consultation meeting with the facility on 02/02/2026. The following areas were discussed during today's meeting: Substantiated Complaint Investigation: Complaint 21-AS-20250815134443 Basic Services Personal Rights Medication Administration Centrally Stored Medications Record Keeping Inadequate Staffing Reporting Requirements Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 Facility currently has two complaint investigations that are still being investigated: Complaint 21-AS-20260505083955 and Complaint 21-AS-20260429143325. These investigations involve concerns with basic services, adequate staffing, not seeking timely medical care, medication administration, and personal rights. Facility's Non Compliance Plan will be in place for 2 years with an end date of May 2028. Facility will be referred to TSP. The Department discussed having TSP work with Licensee on the addressed concerns. No Deficiencies Cited. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026
Mar 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/12/2026 at approximately 12:25PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ali Deniz arrived unannounced at this Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) for the purpose of conducting a Required 1-year inspection. LPA was greeted at the door by Licensee, April Thomas, and was granted access into the facility. Facility has an approved fire clearance and capacity for five (5) non-ambulatory residents and one (1) ambulatory resident. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were five (5) residents in care and three (3) staff members on-site. Facility is a 1 story building with 4 Resident bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, one (1) staff room, and common spaces. At approximately 12:45PM, LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. At approximately 1:10PM, LPA and Licensee toured the building and grounds which was found to be clean and in good repair. LPA observed all walkways and exits to be unobstructed. All notices that are required to be posted have been posted and are in a highly visible area. LPA observed activity supplies for resident use. The amount of fresh and nonperishable foods is within the regulation. Facility kitchen, refrigerators and freezers were clean, and food was stored properly. During the kitchen tour LPA observed nineteen (19) expired food cans (Technical Advice given). Toxins are stored in a locked housekeeping closet in the hallway. There was one (1) locked shed in the backyard for storage. Water temperature measured within regulation between 105- and 120-degrees F at faucets accessible to residents. Fire extinguishers were bought on 03/12/2024 and never has been inspected (Technical Violation given). Licensee agrees to get fire extinguishers inspected as soon as possible. Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors were present and operational. There was enough lighting in all common areas, resident rooms, and hallways. Facility had emergency lightning supplies. Medication is centrally stored and secure in the closed in hallway. At resident bathroom number four (4) LPA observed unsecured oxygen tanks (Technical Violation Given). Continued on LIC809-C page... Continued from LIC809 page... Drill records weren't available for review, licensee stated that facility conducted last drill on December 2025 (See LIC809-D page). LPA unable to complete the annual visit. LPA will come back another time to complete the inspection. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC-809D, Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2026
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff abandoned resident at hospital.
At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deniz arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator, April Thomas. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegation was investigated, “Staff abandoned resident at hospital.” The complaint alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was transported to Kaiser Emergency Room on the morning of 08/15/2025, following a fall at the facility. Reporting Party (RP) stated that approximately 15 minutes after R1 arrived at the hospital, facility staff were contacted by hospital staff to coordinate discharge, but Administrator 1 (S1) stated that R1’s room had already been filled and R1 was not welcome back to facility. RP also stated that around 12:15 p.m. the same day, the Administrator 1 (S1) returned to the hospital and dropped off R1’s belongings at the security desk without his personal medications or oxygen tank. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiated Continued from LIC9099... LPA conducted interviews with S1, who confirmed that R1 had requested to go to the hospital after reporting a fall. S1 stated that they told R1 they would need to pay a transportation fee before to be taken to the hospital for his doctor appointments. R1 declined to make payment without a receipt, the administrator called 911, and R1 was transported by emergency services. S1 confirmed that later the same day, they informed the hospital that R1 would not be returning to the facility and that they dropped off his belongings at the hospital. S1 stated they did not follow up info regarding R1’s condition and could not provide any documentation to support her claim that R1 declined to return to the facility. No written statements, logs, or records were provided to indicate that R1 refused to return. Additionally, R1 had paid rent through 08/22/2025. Based on interview conducted, this allegation is Substantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC9099D (Deficiency Page), Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Executive Director/Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Continued from LIC9099... S1 denied over charging residents for the cost of medications themselves. LPA requested documentation and reviewed the admission agreement, which reflected a $6 service fee related to medication delivery. No documentation or statements were found indicating that residents were charged for medications beyond the agreed-upon delivery and transportation fee. Based record review, interviews conducted, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Executive Director. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250815134443
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(20) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2025
Additional Personal Rights of Residents... (a) In addition to the rights listed in ...: (20) To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, and evictions. A licensee shall not involuntarily transfer or evict... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and LPA observation of records, it was determined Facility refused to accept the resident (R1) back from the hospital. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to read regulation 87468.2 and submit written declaration acknowledging the understanding of regulation and the facility policies and procedures. Items to be submitted by date 10/21/2025.
Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ali Deniz arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management – Deficiencies visit and met with Licensee, April Thomas. During the course of a complaint investigation 21-AS-20250815134443, LPA discovered that the facility failed to report the hospitalization of Resident 1 (R1), who was transported to the emergency room on 08/15/2025 following a reported fall at the facility. Per Title 22, Section 87211(a)(1)(B), the licensee is required to notify the Department within seven days of incident that results in a resident requiring medical treatment. Despite the seriousness of the incident, including injury and hospitalization, the facility did not submit the required incident report to Community Care Licensing (CCL). Furthermore, upon review of the facility file and based on statements from the administrator, it was determined that the facility has never submitted any incident reports to the Department since its initial licensure. This demonstrates a pattern of non-compliance with mandatory reporting requirements. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC809D, Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2025
Reporting Requirements (a)Each licensee shall furnish ..., the following: (1)A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence... (B)Any serious injury as determined ... . This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations made, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, Licensee failed to submit special incident report to the CCL as required which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure all resident incidents are reported to CCL as required. Licensee will complete training from an outside vendor on reporting requirements for whole staff and submit a plan for ongoing compliance by 10/21/2025.
Aug 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff stole resident’s medication.
At approximately 08:50AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Deniz and Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Licensee, April Thomas. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of “Facility staff stole resident’s medication.” Complainant alleged that Staff Member 1 (S1) observed Staff Member 2 (S2) taking Resident 1’s (R1) medication. LPAs conducted interviews. Interview with Complainant did not provide additional information. Multiple attempts to reach S1 for additional information were unsuccessful. Interview conducted with S2 denied any knowledge of medications being stolen. Multiple attempts to interview R1 were unsuccessful. LPAs conducted a medication audit and were unable to determine if there were missing medication. Continued on LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099... Based on observations made, interviews conducted, and lack of evidence, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250516124427
Aug 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
At approximately 08:50AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Deniz and Felias arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management – Deficiencies visit and met with Licensee, April Thomas. During the course of the Complaint Investigation received on 05/16/2025, LPAs observed the following deficiencies: During visit conducted on 05/20/2025, LPAs observed the following: •12 pre-poured tablets of Oxycodone located in a plastic cup. • Facility was not documenting their centrally stored medication in its entirety or storing the narcotic medication safely. Per discussion with Licensee, narcotics were being held in their personal room instead the facility's designated area for centrally stored medications. During visit conducted on 07/23/2025, LPAs made the following medication observations: • AM, PM, and Evening medication were pre-poured for residents located in one of the facility’s kitchen cabinets. Per Licensee, the identified medications were poured approximately a week prior to LPAs conducting their visit. LPAs observed that the plastic cups were not labelled to identify the appropriate resident. Per Licensee, they pass the medication daily and therefore know on sight which medication is supposed to be given to each resident. • Multiple weekly medication trays located in the facility’s medication closet with pre-poured medication. • LPAs did not observe a properly documented centrally stored medication log per regulation. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, LIC809D, Plan of Corrections, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Licensee. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental (h) The following requirements...:(5) Each resident's medication shall be stored in its originally received container. No medications shall be transferred between containers.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations made, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPAs observed multiple instances of resident medication being pre-poured over 24 hours in advance. This is a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to conduct all staff training in medication administration to submit CCL with centrally store medication log for all residents in care by plan of correction date (POC) 08/18/2025.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2025
87465 (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident...: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations made, Licensee didnot comply with the section cited above and did not ensure that there was a completed LIC622 or similar document with the all of the regulatory information required. This is a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to conduct all staff training in medication administration to submit CCL with centrally store medication log for all residents in care by plan of correction date (POC) 08/18/2025.
Mar 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At approximately 9:40 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Star Stevenson made an unannounced annual required inspection of this licensed senior care facility. LPA met with April Thomas - Administrator. Four (4) staff members were present and four (5) clients in care. Staff member S1 was not associated and cleared to work at the facility (type A deficiency issued) At approximately 10:10 AM, LPA toured the building and grounds which was found to be clean and in good repair. LPA observed all walkways and exits to be unobstructed. Facility observed to have a large open and shaded outside area, All notices that are required to be posted including personal rights and "see something, say something" and ombudsman have been posted and are in a highly visible area. LPA observed activity supplies for resident use. Facility kitchen, refrigerators and freezers were clean, and a variety of healthy food was stored properly. Toxins and centrally stored meds were observed to be locked in a storage closet. Sharps and knives were locked as required. Water temperature measured within regulation between 105- and 120-degrees F at faucets accessible to residents. Fire extinguishers inspected were charged. Smoke detectors were found to be in working order. Carbon Monoxide detectors were present. There was enough lighting in all common areas, resident rooms, and hallways. At approximately 11:15 AM, LPA reviewed 5 of 5 resident records and found 5 of 5 residents did not have current signed personal rights or consent for medical treatment (technical violations issued) None of the clients in care were indicated as bedridden on the MD LIC602 forms. At approximately 1:30PM, LPA reviewed 4 staff records. 3 of 4 records did not contain health screening as required (technical violation issued). Evidence of current first aid and CPR training were current. Continued on LIC809C Continued for LIC809 Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: Proof of control of property (Deed or tax documents showing ownership) LIC500- Personnel Report LIC610E- Disaster Plan (update if need and sign) LIC308 Current designation of facility responsibility) Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Administrator April Thomas, whose signature indicates receipt..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Mar 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on to conduct a Annual Inspection utilizing the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify Administrator that LPA is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. Administrator and Licensee arrived to assist LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and licensee discussed magnet release for fire door, process to request a secured perimeter waiver, and securing items in the facility that could pose a hazard to residents. Resident records reviewed. Licensee to include Pre-appraisals, care plans and PRN authorization for all residents. Staff files reviewed. Filles to be better organized and all training documented in files. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Nov 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 11/7/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of conducting a case management and was greeted by Lead Staff, Nathaniel Sherman. The visit is to gather additional documentation for resident (R1) confirming that they have been admitted to the facility as a resident. LPA Tobola received copies of R1's Admissions Agreement and Physician's Report. LPA Tobola confirmed R1 has now been admitted to the facility as a resident. LPA requested for R1's updated Appraisal or Needs & Service Plan to be submitted to CCLD by due date 11/9/2023. In addition, LPA obtained the change of capacity fee from the Administrator to complete the fire clearance inspection process that has been pending. No deficiencies cited during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023
Oct 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 10/19/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of conducting a case management and was greeted by Licensee, April Thomas. The Department was informed that an individual (I1) was wanting to be associated to the facility as a staff member. Previously I1 had an action against them by the Department and was not to reside, work, live in a CCL facility. The terms of the Accusation, Decision and Order were effective from December 11, 2006 for two years. LPA was informed that (I1) resides at the facility and does provide some services as a staff member. However, I1 does not provide any caregiving duties. I1 resides at the facility due to health concerns and is provided care by Licensee. Licensee has agreed that I1 will be considered a resident and will be in compliance with Title 22 Regulations regarding care and supervision. **Immediate Civil Penalty assessed in the amount of $500 due to caregiver background clearance violation. Deficiency cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 20, 2023
All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: This was not met as evidence by:** Based on record review and interview with Licensee, the facility did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 1 individuals (I1) without proof of background clearance or association to the facility, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submitt in writing; a plan to ensure I1 is considered a resident and provide all documents required per regulation (admission agreement, 602, needs/service etc) by POC date 10/20/2023. In addition, Licensee completed an updated LIC200 for increase in capacity and provided to CCLD.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Solano County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Holy Haven II
Fairfield · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Anica Homecare
Fairfield · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Providence Residential Care - Lakehurst
Fairfield · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Vista Home
Fairfield · Small home · 1.0 mi away
$5,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Paradise Valley Residential Care Home
Fairfield · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Joyful Journey Home
Fairfield · Small home · 1.2 mi away
$4,950 a month to start · Covelight estimate