Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Best Care Guest Home

Mid-size home·Licensed for 14·Ontario, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #361880991Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,400 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,800
  • Home sizeLicensed for 14Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit12 of 14 beds occupiedJanuary 14, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitJanuary 14, 2026CDSS inspection record

Best Care Guest Home is a mid-size care home in Ontario — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 14 residents since 2020. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Best Care Guest Home

Is Best Care Guest Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Best Care Guest Home licensed for?

14 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Best Care Guest Home been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Best Care Guest Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Best Care Guest Home cost?

$4,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 74 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Bernardino County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,700 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 74 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Best Care Guest Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sta Clara Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Montclair Hospital Medical Center is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Best Care Guest Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Best Care Guest Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BEST CARE GUEST HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #361880991. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 14 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sta Clara Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 14 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 2 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FOURTEEN (14) NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH TWO (2) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,400a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,800

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,400a month

Likely $3,500–$5,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,400likely $3,500–$5,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,950
$4,400
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$8,950
$6,400
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$4,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate
  • Hacienda LivingChino · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Jace Guest HomeChino · 1.6 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ranch Country HomeChino · 2.4 mi · Small home
    $4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Emerald VistaChino · 2.7 mi · Small home
    $3,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lombardy Senior CareChino · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Oasis Senior CareUpland · 3.4 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Carnation's HomeOntario · 3.7 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Western Assemblies HomeClaremont · 3.9 mi · Mid-size home
    $1,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Villa JoyChino · 4.1 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Golden Ages Senior CareUpland · 4.1 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gold Medal Senior Living GardensClaremont · 4.2 mi · Small home
    $4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • M.A.M. Family Home 1Upland · 4.4 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ira CareUpland · 4.6 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mountain View CenterClaremont · 4.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,550Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026

Where it is

  • 817 S Oaks Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2020. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on January 14, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
13
Most recent visit
January 14, 2026
Occupied at that visit
12 of 14 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 19, 2024 to January 14, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611120254412024330202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's medical needs are met.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Staff Rosario Dalusung and explained today's visit. LPA contacted Administrator Richie Garcia and went over purpose of today's visit. Administrator was unable to come to facility. For the allegation, Staff does not ensure resident's medical needs are met. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 (R1). R1 indicated the need for medical services and was denied which led to R1 calling emergency services independently. LPA spoke with Administrator Richie Garcia who reported to not call emergency services due to no emergency being presented. Substantiated Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D was discussed and provided to Administrator Richie Garcia along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251209091846

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 21, 2026

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not comply with section cited above by not ensuring Resident #1 (R1) was given appropriate medical services, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee confirmed to understand regulation cited and stated to ensure all residents are given appropriate medical treatment when needed. Plan of Correction (POC) will be cleared.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Richie Garcia and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (14) current census (12). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Richie Garcia to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated office for resident/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (6) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (6) resident medications. **Continuation on LIC809C* LPA observed no proper documentation for PRN administration for Resident #4 (R4). Deficiency will be issued. Additionally, LPA observed centrally stored medication log to not be maintained and updated for Resident #5 (R5) and Resident #6 (R6). Deficiency will be issued. LPA also reviewed (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. No issues were observed. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Richie Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2025
Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced Case Management Incident visit and Health and Safety check. LPA met with Administrator Richie Garcia and explained the reason for the visit. The visit is in response to the death of Client #1 (C1), who passed away on 08/21/2025. During the visit, LPA reviewed C1's file and obtained copies of the following: ID/emergency Information, Physician's reports, Medication logs and medical appointments. During today's visit, no red flags were observed, and no deficiencies were cited regarding this incident. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Richie Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is operating out of ratio.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Staff Grace Celis and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews along with obtaining documentation pertaining to allegation. For the allegation, Facility is operating out of ratio. LPA Hernandez conducted (4) staff interviews. 4 out of the 4 staff indicated facility has sufficient staff to supervise residents in care. Staff #2 (S2) stated most residents require limited assistance for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). LPA Hernandez conducted (2) resident interviews. 2 out of the 2 residents stated facility staff is sufficient and denied facility needing additional staff. Unsubstantiated Additionally, LPA Hernandez reviewed Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) file to ensure no higher level of care may be needed. LPA Hernandez observed no residents are on hospice care or need a higher level of care. LPA Hernandez observed sufficient staff to supervise and care for residents in care. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. During today’s visit, no deficiencies pertaining to the allegation were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Staff Grace Celis.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250610153450
Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not abiding by facility's fire clearance.

On 02/25/2025 at 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entry by a staff member and Administrator Richie Garcia was contacted and informed of the visit. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit to Staff #4 (S4). The investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and a review of pertinent documentation. The investigation was conducted by LPAs Elecia Weathersby and Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of records review, observations and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates that staff not abiding by facility's fire clearance. LPAs Weathersby and Brown obtained evidence to corroborate the allegation above. Through the information gathered during the investigation on 07/13/2021, it was confirmed by observation, documents review and interviews that staffs’ are not abiding by facility’s fire clearance. Interviews with Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #4 (R4) indicated that staffs’ at the facility are locking the side gate and front gate around 06:00 PM, 7:00 PM or 07:30 PM. **Cont. in LIC9099C*** Substantiated Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #3 (S3) interviews indicated that they are locking the front gate around 07:00 PM but the side gate is always open. However, during the facility visit on 07/13/2021, LPAs Weathersby and Brown observed a padlock in the side gate/perimeter fence gate. Moreover, during the visit on 07/13/2021, LPAs asked that S1 remove the lock and S1 complied. Moreover, during the facility visit today, 02/25/2025, LPA Brown will assessed immediate civil penalty of $500.00 for the CCR 87203 Fire Safety deficiency issued. Based on LPAs Weathersby and Brown’s observations and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, and therefore the above allegation of staff not abiding by facility's fire clearance is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8) is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099, LIC9099D, LIC421BG and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to staff Rosario Dalusong. The second allegation indicates that staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect. Seven (7) of eight (8) residents reported that staffs’ are treating them with dignity and respect. Three (3) of three (3) staff indicated that they always treat their residents with dignity and respect, and they did not witness a staff at the facility not treating residents with dignity and respect. During the facility visit on 07/13/2021, LPAs Weathersby and Brown observed staffs’ at the facility assisting residents and treating residents with dignity and respect. Based on interviews and observation, the allegation staff threatened resident (Allegation #1), and staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect (Allegation #2) are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to staff Rosario Dalusong.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210708140835

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2025

87203 Fire Safety All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the regulation cited above by not ensuring to protect life and property against fire and panic. LPAs observed the side gate/perimeter fence gate that exits to the front yard with a locked pad lock. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025

Plan of correction: During the facility visit on 07/13/2021, the licensee agrees to remove the padlock observed on the side gate/perimeter fence gate and stated not to lock the side gate/perimeter fence gate without Licensing and Fire Marshall approval. Licensee immediately removed the padlock observed on the side gate/perimeter fence gate during visit on 07/13/2021. Plan of Correction (POC) cleared.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Richie Garcia and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (14) current census (11). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Richie Garcia to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated office for resident/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (6) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (6) resident medications. **Continuation on LIC809C* No issues were observed. Additionally, LPA also reviewed (6) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. No issues were observed. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Richie Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024
Oct 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff sexually abused resident. Staff inappropriately touched resident. Staff does not ensure resident is provided personal privacy during meetings.

On 10/19/2024 at 09:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melody Brown, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegations. LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee/Administrator Richie Garcia. The investigation of the two (2) allegations were conducted by Department staff. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates that facility staff sexually abused resident. Department staff interviewed Resident #1 (R1) who reported allegedly being sexual abused sometime last year but R1 could not provide any specific corresponding dates. Documents review indicated that R1 suffers from mental disorders. In addition, the Department noted that their interview with R1 was inconsistent of what occurred. Moreover, interview with R1’s family provided a pertinent history of R1’s mental condition and they stated that R1 was making a false claim due to R1 previous constant false claims of similar nature. **Continuation in LIC9099C*** Unsubstantiated Based on the evidence, there were no witnesses or documented reports corroborating that facility staff sexually abused R1. The second allegation indicates staff inappropriately touched resident. Interview with R1 indicated that Staff #2 (S2) inappropriately touched R1. During the Department investigation, it was reported that in 03/2024, R1 was assisting S2 on the computer and S2 thanked R1 by giving R1 a kiss on R1’s forehead. Staff interviews revealed that the kiss that S2 gave to R1 was merely an act of kindness and there was no bad or sexual intention behind this act. Interviews with staff and R1’s family indicated that R1 felt triggered by S2’s kiss and due to R1’s mental status, R1 added more false details regarding S2’s gesture. The Department noted that other staff was present and denied further allegation of S2 inappropriately touching R1. Due to insufficient evidence, the Department was not able to corroborate the allegation that staff inappropriately touched resident. The third allegation indicates staff does not ensure resident is provided personal privacy during meetings. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interviews with R1 on 10/19/2024 indicated that staffs at the facility are ensuring that they are providing R1 personal privacy during R1's meetings either with family or therapist both in person or via zoom. R1 added that staffs are closing R1's door during R1's meeting to give R1 personal privacy and R1 also showed LPA Brown that there's a sign that R1 puts on R1's door that indicates "In Therapy Session! Please do not disturb." Interview with R1 revealed that there's no incident that happened at the facility that a staff did not ensure that R1's provided personal privacy during R1's meetings. Eight (8) of eight (8) residents interviewed on 10/19/2024 reported to LPA Brown that staffs at the facility are ensuring that they are provided the personal privacy during their meetings with their family, their therapist, social worker or their doctor. Interviews with five (5) of five (5) staff on 10/19/2024 indicated that they are providing R1 personal privacy during R1's meetings either in person or via zoom. Staffs interviewed reported to LPA Brown that they are all ensuring that all their residents at the facility were provided their personal privacy during their meetings in person or via zoom. Interviews with five (5) of five (5) staff revealed that there's no incident that happened at the facility that they did not ensure that their residents at the facility were provided their personal privacy during their meetings. Therefore, based on the evidence obtained during the Department's investigation, there is insufficient evidence to prove that that facility staff sexually abused resident (Allegation #1), ***Cont. in LIC9099C*** staff inappropriately touched resident (allegation #2) and staff does not ensure resident is provided personal privacy during meetings (allegation #3) are unsubstantiated at this time. Although the allegation of facility staff sexually abused resident, staff inappropriately touched resident and staff does not ensure resident is provided personal privacy during meetings may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Richie Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240326155424
Mar 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to conduct a Health and Safety check of the clients in care at the facility. LPA Rico met with staff Rosario Dalusung explained the reason for the visit. The Health and Safety check included overall observation of the facility inside, and outside, including food supply, medications, physical plant, and the clients in care. LPA Rico did not observe any safety hazards. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Richie Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/15/2023 at 08:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Brown met with Administrator Richie Garcia, and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff present, and three (3) residents present. The facility is a eleven (11) bedroom, eight (8) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of fourteen (14) non-ambulatory residents and the current census is twelve (12) residents. LPA Brown was accompanied by Administrator Garcia to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. Resident #1 (R1) did not have lamp in their bedroom. The shower in Room #2, Room #3 and Room #8 did not have a non-slip mat on the shower floor. During the tour of the facility, LPA Brown observed that Resident #12 has a half bedrail and no written order from R12's physician indicating the need for the postural support maintained in R12's facility record. Also, LPA Brown observed the side gate secured and locked with padlock. This poses an immediate and potential health, safety risk to residents in care. Deficiencies will be issued for the lamp and the non-slip mat and for locking/securing the side gate with padlock. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 110 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a cabinet with the majority of the resident’s medications locked in the medication room. However, LPA Brown found residents medications pre-poured in a small container for the day, up to bedtime medication for each resident at the facility. The facility will be issued a deficiency for medication issue. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable and three (3) days perishable food supply observed at the facility. Care & Supervision: The facility has an administrator present in the facility. LPA Brown observed sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA reviewed six (6) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. The files were complete with updated physician’s reports, admissions agreements, and preadmissions appraisals. LPA reviewed six (6) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA found that six (6) of the six (6) staff have CPR training, staff are properly trained in medication, dementia care, and basic training required for an RCFE. Medications/Medication Administration Record (MAR) were audited and appeared to be dispensed appropriately by staff members. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, four (4) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D forms, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Administrator Richie Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Bernardino County