Aasta Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Camarillo, Ventura County, California — state license #565850158, with a licensed capacity of 130, listed as closed, licensee initiated in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 79 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 25, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

252 homes in view

Aasta Assisted Living

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Licensee Initiated”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 130 residents · Camarillo, CA · Ventura County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #565850158, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
903 Carmen Drive · Camarillo, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 586-4191
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 130 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 130 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ARE 101-114. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 110 times and filed 79 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 25, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 25, 2026
Occupancy at the January 13, 2025 visit
82 of 130 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2023 to January 13, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (11), “Unsubstantiated” (14). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 66 of 79 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20267 state visits · 15 documents
Jun 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202514 state visits · 29 documents
Dec 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff is sleeping during NOC shift. Facility staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the above allegations. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 03/11/2024 by LPAs M. Arroyo and K. Dulek and a subsequent complaint visit was conducted on 01/02/2025 by LPA M. Arroyo. On today's visit, LPA Arroyo met with Executive Director (ED), Monica Reyes. Entrance interview. During the initial visit on 03/11/2024, LPAs Arroyo and Dulek interviewed the Administrator at 09:07am, toured the facility at 09:32am, reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation, interviewed staff at 10:45am, 10:48am and 1:24pm, residents at 10:42am and 10:53am, and reviewed medications beginning at 1:44pm. On 01/02/2025, LPA Arroyo conducted interviews with one staff and six residents between 12:55pm and 1:45pm and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240304113219
202410 state visits · 18 documents
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/lack of supervision leading to questionable death Neglect/lack of supervision: facility employees failed to properly supervise resident resulting in an unwitnessed fall and injuries to the resident Licensee did not meet resident’s ADL needs Licensee did not provide resident’s responsible party an updated care plan Licensee did not comply with reporting requirements

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Emily Peraldi conducted a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 01:56PM and initially met with facility staff. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes at 02:00PM. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 01/04/2024, LPA interviewed staff at 11:43AM, 01:09PM, and 01:25PM, interviewed ED at 11:55AM, toured the facility with ED at 12:15PM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. No immediate health and safety concerns were identified during that facility tour. ED was informed that the allegations were referred to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD)’s Investigation Branch (IB). IB Investigator Douglas Real obtained copies of Resident #1 (R1)’s medical records, interviewed staff, residents and other relevant parties both telephonically or in person othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240102113855
Oct 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is retaining a resident needing a higher level of care Licensee did not ensure resident's hygiene needs were met Licensee did not ensure resident's home health needs were met Licensee did not ensure resident's medical documents were complete

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs initially met with facility staff, then Resident Care Coordinator at 10:03AM and explained the reason for today’s visit. Executive Director/Administrator (ED) Monica Reyes arrived at 11:35AM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPAs interviewed ED at 11:35AM, during an initial complaint visit conducted on 09/15/2023, LPA Dulek interviewed Wellness Director at 11:30AM, ED at 12:20PM, toured Memory Care with ED at 12:40PM, reviewed medications for Resident #1 (R1) at 12:47PM, and staff between 01:32PM and 2:20PM. LPA also reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all pertinent documents and conducted additional interviews with relevant parties. The following was then detthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230908154939
Oct 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address a resident's behavior that posed a risk to other residents in care

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Valeria Conway and Kelly Dulek, conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to issue final findings of the allegation. Upon arrival, LPAs met with front desk staff. Administrator, Monica Reyes, was called via phone. At 11:35 a.m., Administrator arrived at the facility. Reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. On 08/12/2024, from 9:30 A.M. – 2:15 P.M., LPAs initiated an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. During the visit, LPAs toured the physical plant, interviewed staff, residents, resident Responsible Party (RP) and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. It was reported that “Staff did not address a resident's behavior that posed a risk to other residents in care” as it was alleged that staff did ensure to protect Resident #1 (R1) from another resident who was causing R1 distress. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240807114227
Oct 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facilty staff did not administer medications to resident as prescribed The licensee did not provide assistance needed to meet the resident's home health needs Licensee did not allow resident's chosen third-party provider to provide services to the resident Facility is understaffed

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs initially met with front desk staff. Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes was contacted and arrived at the facility at approximately 10:50AM. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 04/05/2023, LPA Dulek interviewed ED over the phone at 01:00PM, LPA interviewed staff at 01:14PM, 01:22PM, and 02:45PM, LPA reviewed medications for Resident #1 (R1) at 01:45PM, and LPA gathered copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed additional staff and reviewed copies of pertinent documents. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230330150348
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is left soiled for an extended period of time Resident has missed meals due to staff neglect Staff do not clean resident's room timely Staff do not put resident's call button in a place accessible to resident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPA initially met with front desk staff. Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes was contacted and arrived at the facility at approximately 10:50AM. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint inspection on 06/01/2023, LPA Dulek interviewed Licensee and ED at 12:35PM, LPA toured the facility along with ED at 12:51PM, interviewed staff between 1:09PM and 02:43PM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all pertinent documents, attempted to interview Resident #1 (R1) telephonically, and interviewed other relevant parties. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230524122929
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed Staff did not address a change in residents’ condition

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Valeria Conway and Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPA initially met with front desk staff. Executive Director, Monica Reyes, was contacted and arrived at the facility at approximately 10:50 A.M. and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 08/12/2024, from 9:30 A.M. – 3:15 P.M., LPAs initiated an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. During the visit, LPAs toured the physical plant, interviewed staff, residents, resident Responsible Party (RP) and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. It was reported that “Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed” as it was alleged that staff did not obtain the prescribed medication for Resident #1 (R1). Conitnued on LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240807114227
Sep 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff prohibiting resident from leaving the facility for visits Facility restricted visitation

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Valeria Conway and Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced 10-day visit complaint o the facility regarding the above noted allegations. LPAs met with Administrator Monica Reyes and explained the reason for the visit. During today's inspection, between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., the LPA briefly toured the facility with the administrator, interviewed the Administrator, residents, caregivers and ombudsman. Additionally, LPAs conducted a file review, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. It was alleged that the staff prohibited resident from leaving the facility for visits of their choosing, it is the concern of the reporting party that Resident #1’s (R1’s) personal rights are being violated. Interview with R1 revealed Administrator told R1 that R1 couldn’t leave the facility. Staff interviews revealed that Administrator stated that R1 can only leave the community with one specific family member. Continued on LIC 9099-C Substhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240909154531
Aug 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from wandering away from the facility Staff do not respond to residents call for assistance in a timely manner Staff do not ensure that residents are adequately fed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA met briefly with Administrator Monica Reyes but she had to leave for an appointment. LPA was assisted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) Esmeralda Elizarraraz. LPA explained the reason for the visit. During today's visit, 8/16/2024, LPA conducted interviews with nine (9) residents starting at 12:52 p.m. On 7/8/2024, LPA had conducted interviews with administrator starting at 10:42 a.m., interviews with multiple staff starting at 11:38 a.m., record review starting at 2:50 p.m., and interviewed one resident starting at 3:14 p.m. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not prevent residents from wandering away from the facility. The complaint indicated there were two elopements on Saturday, 6/29/2024. LPA interviewed staff who worked that day. Nobody was aware of any elopements. The staff in memory care denied that any memory (continued on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240701105839
May 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are making inappropriate comments towards residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegation. LPA met with Resident Care Coordiantor (RCC) Esmeralda Saucedo Elizarraraz and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator was out of the facility during LPA's visit. At 2:33 p.m. LPA conducted an interview with RCC. At 2:50 p.m. LPA conducted a telephone interview with Administrator Monica Reyes. At 3:00 p.m. LPA reviewed pertinent records. At 3:15 p.m. LPA conducted an interview with Resident 1 (R1). (continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240523090009
May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity or respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. LPA was greeted by the administrator Monica Reyes and LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 12:33 LPA interviewed the administrator. At 12:51 LPA reviewed records for resident 1 (R1). At 1:28 p.m. LPA interviewed R1. At 1:47 p.m. LPA interviewed staff 1 (S1). The complaint indicated R1 had gone to the front desk to have documents faxed but the staff treated R1 disrespecfully when the resident requested a fax confirmation sheet. However, R1 is not physically capable of going to the front dest on their own and chooses to stay in their room unless they must leave for an appointment. R1 takes all their meals in their room. R1 communicated to LPA that was not what happened. R1 stated it was "not a major issue" and did not wish to pursue this complaint. (continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240509154156
Mar 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision - the facility staff did not ensure Resident #1 (R1) had oxygen resulting in brain injury.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Martha Arroyo and Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPAs met with Administrator, Monica Reyes and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/25/2023, the Department received a complaint regarding an allegation of Neglect/Lack of Supervision. It was alleged that the facility staff did not ensure Resident #1 (R1) had oxygen resulting in brain injury. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Douglas Real. On 01/26/2023, from 1:30 p.m. to 3:45 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced initial complaint inspection for the allegation listed above. Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230125131322
Mar 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not assist resident with obtaining medical care Facility staff did not assist resident with administering medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Monica Reyes at 02:16PM. Entrance interview conducted. During the initial complaint visit conducted on 01/12/2023, LPA interviewed Administrator at 09:50AM and at various times throughout the visit, toured the facility with Administrator at 11:08AM, interviewed staff at 11:21AM, 12:42PM, and 01:04PM. LPA also gathered copies of pertinent documents. A referral was made to CCLD’s Investigations Branch (IB), was accepted for investigation, and assigned to IB investigator Douglas Real. Investigator Real received and reviewed a copy of Resident #1 (R1)’s hospital records and conducted either telephonic or in-person interviews with facility staff, residents and other pertinent parties on the following dates: 02/09/2023, 02/13/2023, 04/10/2023, and 04/11/2023. The following was then determined: Report Conthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230110153850
Mar 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that resident is provided with a comfortable mattress. Staff are not addressing resident's burn injury

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, the LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Monica Reyes, and was explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. During today's inspection, between 09:35 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., the LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff, resident #1, R1's hospice nurse, and R1's case manager, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report will continue on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 1, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240223083928
Jan 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide resident's records as requested

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes at 11:00 a.m. and explained the reason for the visit. On 1/24/2024, LPA Teresa Camara spoke with the complainant. The complainant confirmed the resident’s records they had requested were received on 1/23/2024 and the concern has been resolved. Therefore, the allegation "Licensee did not provide resident's records as requested" is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted and report issued to the ED. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240123211311
Jan 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident leaving the facility unsupervised.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 10:08AM and initially met with facility staff. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes at 11:00AM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed staff at 10:10AM, 10:20AM and between 12:26PM to 01:50PM, interviewed ED at 11:02AM, toured the facility with ED at 11:47AM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. The following was then determined: The complaint alleges that Resident #1 (R1) left the facility unassisted and was found in the community, was confused and had fallen. The Regional Office had also received an incident report on 01/16/2024 indicating that on 01/15/2024, R1 had left the facility and was found in the community. LPA sent an email to the ED requesting documents for R1, which were received on 01/18/2024. Record review indicated that R1 resides Repthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240118113952
Jan 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee issued an unlawful eviction notice to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 04:08PM and met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed ED at 04:10PM and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. The following was then determined: On 11/07/2023, LPA Dulek received an email from ED Reyes, which contained an eviction notice for Resident #1 (R1). On 11/08/2023, LPA reviewed the eviction notice and replied to the ED indicating the eviction notice did not contain all the requirements per regulation. LPA requested the ED make changes to the submitted eviction notice and resubmit to CCL for approval. ED acknowledged receipt of the email, however, to date has not sent a revised eviction notice for R1. Interviews revealed that R1 has resided at this location prior to Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231108105233
Sep 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not assist resident with self-administration of medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 11:25AM and met with Wellness Director Esmeralda Elizarraraz. Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes arrived at 12:20PM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed Wellness Director at 11:30AM, ED at 12:20PM, toured Memory Care with ED at 12:40PM, reviewed medications for Resident #1 (R1) at 12:47PM, and staff between 01:32PM and 2:20PM. LPA also reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. The following was then determined: During the medication review, R1's medication Mirtazipine 15mg bottle indicated there were 30 count and the medication was started on 08/03/2023. Mirtazipine is ordered once daily and administered in the morning. 36 days elapsed from the date the bottle was opened to the date R1 was hospitalized on 09/07/2023, however REPORT CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230908154939
Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure food of good quality is served to residents in care Staff does not ensure dietary restrictions are followed for residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek initiated an initial complaint visit for the above listed allegations. LPA arrived at 09:52AM and met with Wellness Director Esmeralda Elizarraraz at 10:00AM. Administrator was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 12:50PM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility with Wellness Director at 10:04AM, interviewed residents from 10:40AM to 11:18AM and at 11:24AM and 12:35PM, observed staff delivering lunch and observed lunch in the dining room at 11:22AM. LPA toured the kitchen and took photos of the food supply at 11:36AM Additionally, LPA interviewed staff from 11:33AM to 12:02PM. The following was then determined: It was alleged that the facility does not ensure the food is of good quality and that residents' dietary restrictions are not followed. Interviews revealed that the menu is posted, the kitchen staff prepare the food REPORT CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230828164902
Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations36typical 1
Type B citations21typical 1
Substantiated complaints64typical 2
Total complaints43typical 7
State visits on file110typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202671502025142902024101862023712520225602021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Aasta Assisted Living licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Aasta Assisted Living in Camarillo (Ventura County), California license #565850158, as “Closed, Licensee Initiated, formerly licensed for 130 residents. State records list 79 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 25, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Aasta Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Aasta Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 130 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN ARE 101-114. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.

How much does Aasta Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Aasta Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Aasta Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Aasta Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

82 of 130 beds occupied (63%) when the state visited on January 13, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Aasta Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 110 state visits and 79 dated documents since 2021 for Aasta Assisted Living; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 13, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff is sleeping during NOC shift. Facility staff do not treat residents with dignity and respect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the above allegations. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 03/11/2024 by LPAs M. Arroyo and K. Dulek and a subsequent complaint visit was conducted on 01/02/2025 by LPA M. Arroyo. On today's visit, LPA Arroyo met with Executive Director (ED), Monica Reyes. Entrance interview. During the initial visit on 03/11/2024, LPAs Arroyo and Dulek interviewed the Administrator at 09:07am, toured the facility at 09:32am, reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation, interviewed staff at 10:45am, 10:48am and 1:24pm, residents at 10:42am and 10:53am, and reviewed medications beginning at 1:44pm. On 01/02/2025, LPA Arroyo conducted interviews with one staff and six residents between 12:55pm and 1:45pm and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 13, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240304113219

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/lack of supervision leading to questionable death Neglect/lack of supervision: facility employees failed to properly supervise resident resulting in an unwitnessed fall and injuries to the resident Licensee did not meet resident’s ADL needs Licensee did not provide resident’s responsible party an updated care plan Licensee did not comply with reporting requirements
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Emily Peraldi conducted a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 01:56PM and initially met with facility staff. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes at 02:00PM. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 01/04/2024, LPA interviewed staff at 11:43AM, 01:09PM, and 01:25PM, interviewed ED at 11:55AM, toured the facility with ED at 12:15PM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. No immediate health and safety concerns were identified during that facility tour. ED was informed that the allegations were referred to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD)’s Investigation Branch (IB). IB Investigator Douglas Real obtained copies of Resident #1 (R1)’s medical records, interviewed staff, residents and other relevant parties both telephonically or in person oCDSS inspection report, November 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240102113855
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is retaining a resident needing a higher level of care Licensee did not ensure resident's hygiene needs were met Licensee did not ensure resident's home health needs were met Licensee did not ensure resident's medical documents were complete
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs initially met with facility staff, then Resident Care Coordinator at 10:03AM and explained the reason for today’s visit. Executive Director/Administrator (ED) Monica Reyes arrived at 11:35AM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPAs interviewed ED at 11:35AM, during an initial complaint visit conducted on 09/15/2023, LPA Dulek interviewed Wellness Director at 11:30AM, ED at 12:20PM, toured Memory Care with ED at 12:40PM, reviewed medications for Resident #1 (R1) at 12:47PM, and staff between 01:32PM and 2:20PM. LPA also reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all pertinent documents and conducted additional interviews with relevant parties. The following was then detCDSS inspection report, October 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230908154939
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not address a resident's behavior that posed a risk to other residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Valeria Conway and Kelly Dulek, conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to issue final findings of the allegation. Upon arrival, LPAs met with front desk staff. Administrator, Monica Reyes, was called via phone. At 11:35 a.m., Administrator arrived at the facility. Reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. On 08/12/2024, from 9:30 A.M. – 2:15 P.M., LPAs initiated an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. During the visit, LPAs toured the physical plant, interviewed staff, residents, resident Responsible Party (RP) and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. It was reported that “Staff did not address a resident's behavior that posed a risk to other residents in care” as it was alleged that staff did ensure to protect Resident #1 (R1) from another resident who was causing R1 distress. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240807114227
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacilty staff did not administer medications to resident as prescribed The licensee did not provide assistance needed to meet the resident's home health needs Licensee did not allow resident's chosen third-party provider to provide services to the resident Facility is understaffed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs initially met with front desk staff. Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes was contacted and arrived at the facility at approximately 10:50AM. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 04/05/2023, LPA Dulek interviewed ED over the phone at 01:00PM, LPA interviewed staff at 01:14PM, 01:22PM, and 02:45PM, LPA reviewed medications for Resident #1 (R1) at 01:45PM, and LPA gathered copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed additional staff and reviewed copies of pertinent documents. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230330150348
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is left soiled for an extended period of time Resident has missed meals due to staff neglect Staff do not clean resident's room timely Staff do not put resident's call button in a place accessible to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPA initially met with front desk staff. Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes was contacted and arrived at the facility at approximately 10:50AM. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint inspection on 06/01/2023, LPA Dulek interviewed Licensee and ED at 12:35PM, LPA toured the facility along with ED at 12:51PM, interviewed staff between 1:09PM and 02:43PM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all pertinent documents, attempted to interview Resident #1 (R1) telephonically, and interviewed other relevant parties. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230524122929
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not give resident medication as prescribed Staff did not address a change in residents’ condition
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Valeria Conway and Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPA initially met with front desk staff. Executive Director, Monica Reyes, was contacted and arrived at the facility at approximately 10:50 A.M. and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 08/12/2024, from 9:30 A.M. – 3:15 P.M., LPAs initiated an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. During the visit, LPAs toured the physical plant, interviewed staff, residents, resident Responsible Party (RP) and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. It was reported that “Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed” as it was alleged that staff did not obtain the prescribed medication for Resident #1 (R1). Conitnued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240807114227
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff prohibiting resident from leaving the facility for visits Facility restricted visitation
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Valeria Conway and Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced 10-day visit complaint o the facility regarding the above noted allegations. LPAs met with Administrator Monica Reyes and explained the reason for the visit. During today's inspection, between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., the LPA briefly toured the facility with the administrator, interviewed the Administrator, residents, caregivers and ombudsman. Additionally, LPAs conducted a file review, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. It was alleged that the staff prohibited resident from leaving the facility for visits of their choosing, it is the concern of the reporting party that Resident #1’s (R1’s) personal rights are being violated. Interview with R1 revealed Administrator told R1 that R1 couldn’t leave the facility. Staff interviews revealed that Administrator stated that R1 can only leave the community with one specific family member. Continued on LIC 9099-C SubsCDSS inspection report, September 11, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240909154531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent residents from wandering away from the facility Staff do not respond to residents call for assistance in a timely manner Staff do not ensure that residents are adequately fed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA met briefly with Administrator Monica Reyes but she had to leave for an appointment. LPA was assisted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) Esmeralda Elizarraraz. LPA explained the reason for the visit. During today's visit, 8/16/2024, LPA conducted interviews with nine (9) residents starting at 12:52 p.m. On 7/8/2024, LPA had conducted interviews with administrator starting at 10:42 a.m., interviews with multiple staff starting at 11:38 a.m., record review starting at 2:50 p.m., and interviewed one resident starting at 3:14 p.m. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not prevent residents from wandering away from the facility. The complaint indicated there were two elopements on Saturday, 6/29/2024. LPA interviewed staff who worked that day. Nobody was aware of any elopements. The staff in memory care denied that any memory (continued on LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 16, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240701105839
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are making inappropriate comments towards residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegation. LPA met with Resident Care Coordiantor (RCC) Esmeralda Saucedo Elizarraraz and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator was out of the facility during LPA's visit. At 2:33 p.m. LPA conducted an interview with RCC. At 2:50 p.m. LPA conducted a telephone interview with Administrator Monica Reyes. At 3:00 p.m. LPA reviewed pertinent records. At 3:15 p.m. LPA conducted an interview with Resident 1 (R1). (continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240523090009
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity or respect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. LPA was greeted by the administrator Monica Reyes and LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 12:33 LPA interviewed the administrator. At 12:51 LPA reviewed records for resident 1 (R1). At 1:28 p.m. LPA interviewed R1. At 1:47 p.m. LPA interviewed staff 1 (S1). The complaint indicated R1 had gone to the front desk to have documents faxed but the staff treated R1 disrespecfully when the resident requested a fax confirmation sheet. However, R1 is not physically capable of going to the front dest on their own and chooses to stay in their room unless they must leave for an appointment. R1 takes all their meals in their room. R1 communicated to LPA that was not what happened. R1 stated it was "not a major issue" and did not wish to pursue this complaint. (continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240509154156
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Care and Supervision - the facility staff did not ensure Resident #1 (R1) had oxygen resulting in brain injury.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Martha Arroyo and Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPAs met with Administrator, Monica Reyes and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/25/2023, the Department received a complaint regarding an allegation of Neglect/Lack of Supervision. It was alleged that the facility staff did not ensure Resident #1 (R1) had oxygen resulting in brain injury. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Douglas Real. On 01/26/2023, from 1:30 p.m. to 3:45 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced initial complaint inspection for the allegation listed above. Continued on LIC 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230125131322
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not assist resident with obtaining medical care Facility staff did not assist resident with administering medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek and Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Monica Reyes at 02:16PM. Entrance interview conducted. During the initial complaint visit conducted on 01/12/2023, LPA interviewed Administrator at 09:50AM and at various times throughout the visit, toured the facility with Administrator at 11:08AM, interviewed staff at 11:21AM, 12:42PM, and 01:04PM. LPA also gathered copies of pertinent documents. A referral was made to CCLD’s Investigations Branch (IB), was accepted for investigation, and assigned to IB investigator Douglas Real. Investigator Real received and reviewed a copy of Resident #1 (R1)’s hospital records and conducted either telephonic or in-person interviews with facility staff, residents and other pertinent parties on the following dates: 02/09/2023, 02/13/2023, 04/10/2023, and 04/11/2023. The following was then determined: Report ConCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230110153850
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring that resident is provided with a comfortable mattress. Staff are not addressing resident's burn injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, the LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Monica Reyes, and was explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. During today's inspection, between 09:35 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., the LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff, resident #1, R1's hospice nurse, and R1's case manager, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report will continue on LIC9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 1, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240223083928
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide resident's records as requested
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes at 11:00 a.m. and explained the reason for the visit. On 1/24/2024, LPA Teresa Camara spoke with the complainant. The complainant confirmed the resident’s records they had requested were received on 1/23/2024 and the concern has been resolved. Therefore, the allegation "Licensee did not provide resident's records as requested" is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted and report issued to the ED. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240123211311
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident leaving the facility unsupervised.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 10:08AM and initially met with facility staff. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes at 11:00AM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed staff at 10:10AM, 10:20AM and between 12:26PM to 01:50PM, interviewed ED at 11:02AM, toured the facility with ED at 11:47AM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. The following was then determined: The complaint alleges that Resident #1 (R1) left the facility unassisted and was found in the community, was confused and had fallen. The Regional Office had also received an incident report on 01/16/2024 indicating that on 01/15/2024, R1 had left the facility and was found in the community. LPA sent an email to the ED requesting documents for R1, which were received on 01/18/2024. Record review indicated that R1 resides RepCDSS inspection report, January 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240118113952

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee issued an unlawful eviction notice to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 04:08PM and met with Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed ED at 04:10PM and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. The following was then determined: On 11/07/2023, LPA Dulek received an email from ED Reyes, which contained an eviction notice for Resident #1 (R1). On 11/08/2023, LPA reviewed the eviction notice and replied to the ED indicating the eviction notice did not contain all the requirements per regulation. LPA requested the ED make changes to the submitted eviction notice and resubmit to CCL for approval. ED acknowledged receipt of the email, however, to date has not sent a revised eviction notice for R1. Interviews revealed that R1 has resided at this location prior to Report Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231108105233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not assist resident with self-administration of medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 11:25AM and met with Wellness Director Esmeralda Elizarraraz. Executive Director (ED) Monica Reyes arrived at 12:20PM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed Wellness Director at 11:30AM, ED at 12:20PM, toured Memory Care with ED at 12:40PM, reviewed medications for Resident #1 (R1) at 12:47PM, and staff between 01:32PM and 2:20PM. LPA also reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. The following was then determined: During the medication review, R1's medication Mirtazipine 15mg bottle indicated there were 30 count and the medication was started on 08/03/2023. Mirtazipine is ordered once daily and administered in the morning. 36 days elapsed from the date the bottle was opened to the date R1 was hospitalized on 09/07/2023, however REPORT CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230908154939
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure food of good quality is served to residents in care Staff does not ensure dietary restrictions are followed for residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek initiated an initial complaint visit for the above listed allegations. LPA arrived at 09:52AM and met with Wellness Director Esmeralda Elizarraraz at 10:00AM. Administrator was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 12:50PM. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility with Wellness Director at 10:04AM, interviewed residents from 10:40AM to 11:18AM and at 11:24AM and 12:35PM, observed staff delivering lunch and observed lunch in the dining room at 11:22AM. LPA toured the kitchen and took photos of the food supply at 11:36AM Additionally, LPA interviewed staff from 11:33AM to 12:02PM. The following was then determined: It was alleged that the facility does not ensure the food is of good quality and that residents' dietary restrictions are not followed. Interviews revealed that the menu is posted, the kitchen staff prepare the food REPORT CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230828164902
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not assist with resident's medication as prescribed Facility staff are not trained for the job assigned to them Insufficient staffing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint inspection with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above at 12:04PM. The LPA met with Administrator Monica Reyes and explained the reason for today's visit. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed residents from 02:33PM to 03:05PM. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 06/01/2022, LPA toured the facility including kitchen and all food service areas with Administrator at 12:40PM, conducted staff and resident interviews at 12:03PM, 12:47PM, and 1:52PM. LPA also gathered copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all pertinent documents and interviewed staff and residents during unrelated facility visits. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 14, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220523161429
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not administer resident's medications in a timely manner Food service is inadequate Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items Resident is not accorded privacy
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint inspection at the facility today. The LPA arrived at 10:23AM and met with Administrator Monica Reyes. The LPA informed Administrator of the reason for today's inspection. During today’s visit, LPA reviewed documents previously provided and interviewed staff and residents between 01:05PM and 03:21PM. During an initial complaint inspection conducted on 09/01/2021, LPA Dulek conducted a facility tour with Administrator Robert Gutierrez and Resident Care Coordinator at 11:22 AM, conducted staff interviews between 11:50AM and 12:51PM as well as between 1:29PM and 1:58PM, conducted a medication review at 1:06PM and gathered copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 17, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210823081259
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure resident's blood sugars were being monitored properly while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint inspection for the allegation listed above at 10:23AM. The LPA met with Administrator Monica Reyes and explained the reason for today's visit. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed staff at 11:20AM, conducted staff and resident interviews between 01:05PM and 03:21PM. During an initial complaint inspection at the facility on 01/26/2023, LPA interviewed Administrator at 01:30PM and at various times throughout the visit, LPA toured the facility with Administrator at 01:50PM, and gathered copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed pertinent documents and interviewed residents related to this complaint during unrelated facility visits. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 17, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230125094625
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility no longer has control of the property
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint inspection with the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegation. The LPA met with Administrator Monica Reyes. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 05/05/2022, LPA toured the facility with Administrator Robert Gutierrez at 1:33 PM, conducted Administrator interview at 12:48PM, and LPA gathered copies of pertinent documents. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed pertinent documents and conducted telephone interviews with relevant parties. The following was then determined: It was alleged that the licensee no longer had control of the property, as the lease agreement between the property owner and the licensee had a specification related to approval of a HUD loan, which was not Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 7, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220502122736
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to seek timely medical attention for resident in care Licensee did not allow resident(s) to select their own health care provider
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint inspection with the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. The LPA met with Administrator Monica Reyes. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 08/13/2021, LPA Dulek conducted an interview with Administrator at 12:16PM, conducted facility tour at 1:05PM, and gathered copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed copies of pertinent documents and conducted interviews with staff and residents regarding these allegations during unrelated facility visits. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 7, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210805085248
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not responding timely to residents’ alerts
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint inspection with the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegation. The LPA met with Administrator Monica Reyes. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 11/02/2022, LPA interviewed Facility Designee at 12:35PM, toured the facility, including kitchen and all food service areas with facility Designee at 12:50PM, took photos of relevant facility areas, and conducted a telephone call with Licensee at 01:50PM. LPA also gathered copies of pertinent documents. During a subsequent complaint visit conducted on 06/13/2023, LPA conducted interviews with staff between 12:52PM and 2:15PM, observed dinner service in the dining room, conducted resident interviews between 04:58PM and 05:45PM, and gathered copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed additional residents and stafCDSS inspection report, July 7, 2023 · control 29-AS-20221028153640

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 110 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
36
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
21
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
64
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
43
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
110
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 586-4191
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Aasta Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.