Regency Palms Oxnard is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Oxnard, Ventura County, California — state license #565850112, licensed for 127 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 39 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Regency Palms Oxnard

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 127 residents · Oxnard, CA · Ventura County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #565850112, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1020 Bismark Way · Oxnard, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 247-0227
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 30 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 97 AMBULATORY, 30 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 20 RESIDENTS. BEDRIDDEN ROOMS: 107,108,118,119,129,130,141,160,161,169,170,179,180, 189,190.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 56 times and filed 39 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 19, 2026
Occupancy at the August 28, 2025 visit
94 of 127 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 24 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 19, 2022 to August 28, 2025. 24 of the 24 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (10), “Unsubstantiated” (14). 24 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 24 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 36 of 39 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 10 documents
Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202512 state visits · 19 documents
Nov 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure infection control guidelines are being followed. Staff do not ensure care needs of resident are being met.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 10:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:35 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) Kenneth "Ken" Mahler and Wellness Director Gloria Morales met with the LPA. During the initial visit conducted on 08/22/2024 between 9:58 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, two (2) staff, and six (6) residents. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the Wellness Director, two (2) staff and one (1) resident. The LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents during both visits. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240814093937
Aug 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure that staff are trained.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 10:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:00 p.m., the LPA spoke with Executive Director (ED) Kenneth "Ken" Mahler telephonically, as the ED was unavailable to meet the LPA. During the initial visit conducted on 5/15/2025 between 9:49 a.m. and 3:45 p.m., the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, two (2) residents, and two (2) staff. The LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, between 11:11 a.m. and 2:20 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review of six (6) personnel files. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250514081250
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff do not report incidents to appropriate parties.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 10:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:00 p.m., the LPA spoke with Executive Director (ED) Kenneth "Ken" Mahler telephonically, as the ED was unavailable to meet the LPA. During the initial visit conducted on 5/15/2025 between 9:49 a.m. and 3:45 p.m., the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, two (2) residents, and two (2) staff. The LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a file review for Resident #1 (R1). Continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250509102647
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not shower resident per admission agreement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. The LPA met with Sales Director Ty Hanson, and and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Ken Mahler was unable to be present during today's visit. On 04/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 03/17/25, LPA Cortez, interviewed seven (7) staff, three (3) residents and observed activities and lunch in Memory Care. On 04/24/25, LPA Cortez interviewed one (1) staff, three (3) residents, three (3) resident's family members and/or their authorized person, observed dinner in Memory Care, conducted a file review and collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 04/29/25, LPA Cortez conducted two (2) staff, one (1) resident, and two (2) resident family members interviews, observed resident activities, lunch and dinner being served. On 05/12/25, LPA Cortez interviewed sithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240417093431
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medication to a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility. At 9:49 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:00 a.m., the Executive Director (ED), Kenneth “Ken” Mahler met with the LPA. At 10:00 a.m., the LPA conducted an interview with the ED. At 10:35 a.m., the LPA, along with the ED conducted a physical plant tour. Between 10:40 a.m. and 11:21 a.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for eight (8) residents. Starting at 10:51 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with two (2) staff and two (2) residents. At 11:45 a.m., the LPA requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents. At 12:00 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review Resident #1 (R1’s) records. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250514081250
May 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff not providing activities for residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA met with Kenneth Mahler, Administrator, and and explained the reason for the visit. On 04/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 03/17/25, LPA Cortez, interviewed seven (7) staff, three (3) residents and observed activities and lunch in Memory Care. On 04/24/25, LPA Cortez interviewed one (1) staff, three (3) residents, three (3) resident's family members and/or their authorized person, observed dinner in Memory Care, conducted a file review and collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 04/29/25, LPA Cortez conducted two (2) staff, one (1) resident, and two (2) resident family members interviews, observed resident activities, lunch and dinner being served. During today's visit the LPA interviwed six (6) staff, two (2) resident's family members, and observed lunthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240417093431
Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense medication to resident resulting in hospitalization. Facility staff did not supervise residents resulting in residents eloping. Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA met with Kenneth Mahler, Administrator, and and explained the reason for the visit. On 04/17/2024, the Woodland Hills North Adult and Senior Care office received a complaint regarding multiple allegations, one of them being of neglect/lack of supervision. The complaint alleged that the facility staff did not dispense Triamterene medication for Resident #1 (R1) which resulted in hospitalization. This allegation was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Edward Hector. All other allegations were investigated by LPA Cortez. On 04/18/2024, from 11:00am to 1:11pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to investigate the allegations listed above. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240417093431
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately supervise resident while in care.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Emily Peraldi and Angela Barutyan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 12:30 p.m., the LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Ken Mahler and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 3/21/2025 between 9:55 a.m. and 3:35 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, five (5) residents, and nine (9) staff. On 03/27/2025, LPA Peraldi conducted a telephonic interview with Resident’s (R1’s) family member. During today’s visit, between 12:40 p.m. and 1:55 p.m., the LPAs conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, and one (1) staff. During both visits, the LPAs obtained copies of pertinent documents. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250314160022
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility not providing a refund to authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Ken Mahler, and was explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 05/01/2024, between 10:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., the LPA interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. During today's visit the LPA interviewed two (2) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240425084305
Jan 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unqualified facility staff are providing wound care to residents. Facility staff are falsifying resident records.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 09:30 a.m., the LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Ken Mahler and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 12/18/2024 between 10:00 a.m. and 3:15 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, ten (10) residents, and three (3) staff. During the initial visit, the LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, between 09:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a physical plant tour, reviewed records and conducted interviews with three (3) staff. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241211134457
Jan 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not dispense medications as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility. At 10:00 a.m., the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Ken Mahler, and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:05 a.m., the LPA conducted an interview with the ED. Between 10:36 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for ten (10) residents. Starting at 10:22 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with three (3) staff. At 1:44 p.m., the LPA requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents. At 2:45 p.m., the LPA, along with the ED conducted a physical plant tour. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241211134457
Apr 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of care and supervision resulted in resident falling. Resident’s personal rights are being violated.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility for the above allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Kenneth Mahler, and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. This complaint was initiated on 09/14/2023. During the visit of 09/14/2023, LPA Camara conducted a joint interview with the ED and one staff at 9:10 a.m. and obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, LPA Arroyo conducted interviews with the ED, six staff members, and seven residents between 10:12 a.m. and 2:28 p.m. and obtained a copy of the resident roster and staff schedule. Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230908093134
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not acting appropriately while at work

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility. Upon arrival LPA met with Kenneth Mahler, Executive Director (ED) and the purpose of the visit was explained. On 07/14/2023, information was received that "staff are smoking marijuana while on duty in the facility common restroom". On 07/21/2023, during the initial visit, LPA met with former Wellness Director Meshyll Filipinas, and conducted a physical plant tour at 10:45AM; common areas of the facility, resident rooms and common restrooms were observed through-out the building. Also, eight (8) staff were interviewed from approximately 12PM-3:15pm. During todays visit, LPA toured the facility at approximately 3pm and interviewed six (6) random residents who reported that they have not seen any staff member smoking (marijuana or cigarettes) at the facility or acting inappropriately. Staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff did confirm that they have observed staff smoke cigarthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230714174612
Jan 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that a facility door was locked, resulting in resident leaving the facility unsupervised.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived announced to conduct a 10-day Complaint visit to the facility above. The LPA met with Administrator Kenneth Mahler and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPA requested Resident 1 (R1's) preplacement Appraisal, LIC.602A Physicians report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, staff roster, residents’ roster, and incident report. The LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, two (2) Staff and R1, and toured the memory care unit with staff between 9:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. On the allegation Staff did not ensure that a facility door was locked, resulting in resident leaving the facility unsupervised, it is the reporting party’s concern that a resident with dementia had run away from the facility and did not want to return. To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted interviews, and a file review. File review revealed that R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia and cannot leave the facility unassisted. Report will continue on LIC9099-the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231127163113
Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is refusing to give refund without a signed release

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an intitial complaint investigation visit. LPA met with executive director (ED) Kenneth Mahler and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:10 a.m. LPA conducted a joint interview with the ED and staff 1 (S1). Based on the complaint allegations the ED knew which resident this complaint was regarding. Resident 1 (R1) was at the facility for respite and was deemed mostly independent. The facility staff assisted R1 with medications and was available to R1 if any assistance was needed. At 9:20 a.m. S1 and ED gathered documents requested by LPA. R1's admission agreement showed the non-refundable fees paid by R1 totaled $1,900 ($500 community/assessment fee and $1,400 rent for seven days). R1 lived at the facility two days, had two falls and then transferred to a skilled nursing facility. The ED provided evidence to LPA that the total amount of $1,900 was electronically refunded to R1 on 9/14/2023. Based on this information, the above nthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230908093134
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations9typical 1
Type B citations12typical 1
Substantiated complaints22typical 2
Total complaints26typical 7
State visits on file56typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20266100202512194202455120237842022451
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 247-0227

Is Regency Palms Oxnard licensed?

Yes — Regency Palms Oxnard is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Oxnard (Ventura County): California license #565850112, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 127 residents. State records list 39 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Regency Palms Oxnard care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Regency Palms Oxnard with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 97 AMBULATORY, 30 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 20 RESIDENTS. BEDRIDDEN ROOMS: 107,108,118,119,129,130,141,160,161,169,170,179,180, 189,190.

How much does Regency Palms Oxnard cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Regency Palms Oxnard's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Regency Palms Oxnard accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Regency Palms Oxnard is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

94 of 127 beds occupied (74%) when the state visited on August 28, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Regency Palms Oxnard?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 56 state visits and 39 dated documents since 2022 for Regency Palms Oxnard; 24 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 28, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

24 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure infection control guidelines are being followed. Staff do not ensure care needs of resident are being met.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 10:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:35 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) Kenneth "Ken" Mahler and Wellness Director Gloria Morales met with the LPA. During the initial visit conducted on 08/22/2024 between 9:58 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, two (2) staff, and six (6) residents. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the Wellness Director, two (2) staff and one (1) resident. The LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents during both visits. Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240814093937
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not ensure that staff are trained.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 10:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:00 p.m., the LPA spoke with Executive Director (ED) Kenneth "Ken" Mahler telephonically, as the ED was unavailable to meet the LPA. During the initial visit conducted on 5/15/2025 between 9:49 a.m. and 3:45 p.m., the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, two (2) residents, and two (2) staff. The LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, between 11:11 a.m. and 2:20 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review of six (6) personnel files. Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250514081250
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff do not report incidents to appropriate parties.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 10:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:00 p.m., the LPA spoke with Executive Director (ED) Kenneth "Ken" Mahler telephonically, as the ED was unavailable to meet the LPA. During the initial visit conducted on 5/15/2025 between 9:49 a.m. and 3:45 p.m., the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, two (2) residents, and two (2) staff. The LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a file review for Resident #1 (R1). Continued on LIC 9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250509102647
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not shower resident per admission agreement.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. The LPA met with Sales Director Ty Hanson, and and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Ken Mahler was unable to be present during today's visit. On 04/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 03/17/25, LPA Cortez, interviewed seven (7) staff, three (3) residents and observed activities and lunch in Memory Care. On 04/24/25, LPA Cortez interviewed one (1) staff, three (3) residents, three (3) resident's family members and/or their authorized person, observed dinner in Memory Care, conducted a file review and collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 04/29/25, LPA Cortez conducted two (2) staff, one (1) resident, and two (2) resident family members interviews, observed resident activities, lunch and dinner being served. On 05/12/25, LPA Cortez interviewed siCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240417093431
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer medication to a resident in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility. At 9:49 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:00 a.m., the Executive Director (ED), Kenneth “Ken” Mahler met with the LPA. At 10:00 a.m., the LPA conducted an interview with the ED. At 10:35 a.m., the LPA, along with the ED conducted a physical plant tour. Between 10:40 a.m. and 11:21 a.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for eight (8) residents. Starting at 10:51 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with two (2) staff and two (2) residents. At 11:45 a.m., the LPA requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents. At 12:00 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review Resident #1 (R1’s) records. Continued on LIC 9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250514081250
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not providing activities for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA met with Kenneth Mahler, Administrator, and and explained the reason for the visit. On 04/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 03/17/25, LPA Cortez, interviewed seven (7) staff, three (3) residents and observed activities and lunch in Memory Care. On 04/24/25, LPA Cortez interviewed one (1) staff, three (3) residents, three (3) resident's family members and/or their authorized person, observed dinner in Memory Care, conducted a file review and collected pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 04/29/25, LPA Cortez conducted two (2) staff, one (1) resident, and two (2) resident family members interviews, observed resident activities, lunch and dinner being served. During today's visit the LPA interviwed six (6) staff, two (2) resident's family members, and observed lunCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240417093431
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not dispense medication to resident resulting in hospitalization. Facility staff did not supervise residents resulting in residents eloping. Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA met with Kenneth Mahler, Administrator, and and explained the reason for the visit. On 04/17/2024, the Woodland Hills North Adult and Senior Care office received a complaint regarding multiple allegations, one of them being of neglect/lack of supervision. The complaint alleged that the facility staff did not dispense Triamterene medication for Resident #1 (R1) which resulted in hospitalization. This allegation was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Edward Hector. All other allegations were investigated by LPA Cortez. On 04/18/2024, from 11:00am to 1:11pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to investigate the allegations listed above. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240417093431
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not adequately supervise resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Emily Peraldi and Angela Barutyan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 12:30 p.m., the LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Ken Mahler and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 3/21/2025 between 9:55 a.m. and 3:35 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, five (5) residents, and nine (9) staff. On 03/27/2025, LPA Peraldi conducted a telephonic interview with Resident’s (R1’s) family member. During today’s visit, between 12:40 p.m. and 1:55 p.m., the LPAs conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, and one (1) staff. During both visits, the LPAs obtained copies of pertinent documents. Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250314160022
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not providing a refund to authorized representative
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Ken Mahler, and was explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 05/01/2024, between 10:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., the LPA interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. During today's visit the LPA interviewed two (2) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 24, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240425084305
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified facility staff are providing wound care to residents. Facility staff are falsifying resident records.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 09:30 a.m., the LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Ken Mahler and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 12/18/2024 between 10:00 a.m. and 3:15 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a physical plant tour and interviews with the ED, ten (10) residents, and three (3) staff. During the initial visit, the LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, between 09:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., LPA Peraldi conducted a physical plant tour, reviewed records and conducted interviews with three (3) staff. Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241211134457

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not dispense medications as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility. At 10:00 a.m., the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Ken Mahler, and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:05 a.m., the LPA conducted an interview with the ED. Between 10:36 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for ten (10) residents. Starting at 10:22 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with three (3) staff. At 1:44 p.m., the LPA requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents. At 2:45 p.m., the LPA, along with the ED conducted a physical plant tour. Continued on LIC 9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 18, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241211134457
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of care and supervision resulted in resident falling. Resident’s personal rights are being violated.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility for the above allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Kenneth Mahler, and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. This complaint was initiated on 09/14/2023. During the visit of 09/14/2023, LPA Camara conducted a joint interview with the ED and one staff at 9:10 a.m. and obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, LPA Arroyo conducted interviews with the ED, six staff members, and seven residents between 10:12 a.m. and 2:28 p.m. and obtained a copy of the resident roster and staff schedule. Continued on LIC 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230908093134
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not acting appropriately while at work
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility. Upon arrival LPA met with Kenneth Mahler, Executive Director (ED) and the purpose of the visit was explained. On 07/14/2023, information was received that "staff are smoking marijuana while on duty in the facility common restroom". On 07/21/2023, during the initial visit, LPA met with former Wellness Director Meshyll Filipinas, and conducted a physical plant tour at 10:45AM; common areas of the facility, resident rooms and common restrooms were observed through-out the building. Also, eight (8) staff were interviewed from approximately 12PM-3:15pm. During todays visit, LPA toured the facility at approximately 3pm and interviewed six (6) random residents who reported that they have not seen any staff member smoking (marijuana or cigarettes) at the facility or acting inappropriately. Staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff did confirm that they have observed staff smoke cigarCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230714174612

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that a facility door was locked, resulting in resident leaving the facility unsupervised.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived announced to conduct a 10-day Complaint visit to the facility above. The LPA met with Administrator Kenneth Mahler and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPA requested Resident 1 (R1's) preplacement Appraisal, LIC.602A Physicians report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, staff roster, residents’ roster, and incident report. The LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, two (2) Staff and R1, and toured the memory care unit with staff between 9:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. On the allegation Staff did not ensure that a facility door was locked, resulting in resident leaving the facility unsupervised, it is the reporting party’s concern that a resident with dementia had run away from the facility and did not want to return. To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted interviews, and a file review. File review revealed that R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia and cannot leave the facility unassisted. Report will continue on LIC9099-CDSS inspection report, December 6, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231127163113
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is refusing to give refund without a signed release
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an intitial complaint investigation visit. LPA met with executive director (ED) Kenneth Mahler and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:10 a.m. LPA conducted a joint interview with the ED and staff 1 (S1). Based on the complaint allegations the ED knew which resident this complaint was regarding. Resident 1 (R1) was at the facility for respite and was deemed mostly independent. The facility staff assisted R1 with medications and was available to R1 if any assistance was needed. At 9:20 a.m. S1 and ED gathered documents requested by LPA. R1's admission agreement showed the non-refundable fees paid by R1 totaled $1,900 ($500 community/assessment fee and $1,400 rent for seven days). R1 lived at the facility two days, had two falls and then transferred to a skilled nursing facility. The ED provided evidence to LPA that the total amount of $1,900 was electronically refunded to R1 on 9/14/2023. Based on this information, the above nCDSS inspection report, September 14, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230908093134
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's apartment is a safety hazard
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a complaint visit to investigate above allegations. Upon arrival LPA was informed that Executive Director is off today. At approximately 10:20am, LPA met with Wellness Director Meshyll Filipinas and reason for the visit was explained. A copy of the staff and resident roster was requested. At approximate 10:45am LPA toured the facility with Ms. Filipinas. At 11:04am, Resident #1's (R1) room was toured and observed with multiple boxes of things all around; clutter of misalainious items all over the floor. There is no clear path to ambulate in this room which is a safety hazard. R1's bathroom is also cluttered with items all around with no clear path to ambulate. There was no clear path to go inside R1's room or bathroom. Based on the observation of R1's room during todays visit allegation "Resident's apartment is a safety hazard" is substantiated. The following deficiency was cited (See LIC 9099-D) from the California Code of RegulCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230714174612
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIncontinent residents are not being changed timely Residents are not being bathed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint inspection at the facility today regarding the above allegations. The LPA met with Administrator Ken Mahler and explained the reason for the inspection. On 03/14/2023, LPAs Martha Arroyo and Esther Cortez initiated the investigation. They toured the facility at 11:48 AM, and conducted interviews with the ED, one staff, and one resident between 11:30 AM and 1:12 PM. At 12:20 PM, the LPAs conducted a record review and obtained a copy of the resident roster, staff roster, staff schedule, Activity Calendar, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 06/20/2023, LPA Lopez conducted a subsequent visit. The LPA conducted a physical plant tour beginning at 11:13 AM, conducted three resident interviews and five staff interviews between 11:16 AM and 3:31 PM and reviewed facility records. Report continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230310122826
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in financial distress.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KaSandra Lopez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, LPA Lopez met with Administrator Ken Mahler and explained the reason for the visit. On 09/21/2022, the Department received a complaint regarding an allegation “Facility is in financial distress”. It was alleged that the facility had filed bankruptcy. The Reporting Party was concerned how the bankruptcy would affect the residents in care. On 10/20/2022, a Solvency Audit request was made to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Audit Section and assigned to Auditor Jorge Mojica to investigate the allegation. Today a scheduled meeting was held at the facility with Administrator Ken Mahler, and LPA Lopez along with Christine Hanna, Managing Member of Global Premier Regency Palms Oxnard LP, Sarang Tatimatla Chief Restructuring Officer, and CCLD General Auditor III Jorge Mojico via video call to discuss the audit findings. RepoCDSS inspection report, July 12, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220921132620
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not attend to resident in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation inspection at the facility today regarding the above allegations. The LPA met with Administrator Ken Mahler at and explained the reason today's inspection. On 04/14/2022 at 10:07 AM, LPA Lopez began the investigation and conducted an interview with the Administrator. At approximately 10:20 AM, the LPA reviewed facility records and obtained pertinent copies. Between 11:40 AM and 3:14 PM the LPA conducted interviews with six staff members and at 3:20 PM the LPA and Administrator tested the pull cord signal system and pendent for apartment 125 and both were observed to be operational. Report continued on LIC 9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 12, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220408113452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting the resident with medications correctly Resident did not receive medication timely Staff does not treat resident with dignity and respect Staff is not assisting resident with paying their bills
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint inspection at the facility regarding the above allegations. The LPA met with Wellness Director Meshyll Filipinas and explained the reason for the inspection. This complaint investigation was initiated on 03/10/2023. During the 03/10/2023 inspection, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour, reviewed medications for Resident #1 (R1), interviewed the Administrator, and interviewed one staff between 11:19 AM-12:19 PM. R1 was not present in the facility to be interviewed on this day. During today's inspection, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour beginning at 11:13 AM, conducted three resident interviews and five staff interviews between 11:16 AM and 3:31 PM. The LPA was advised that R1 no longer resides at the facility. Report continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230308120104
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not being provided with activities
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Martha Arroyo and Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, LPAs met with Executive Director (ED), Ken Mahler and the reason for visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, the LPAs toured the facility at 11:48am, conducted interviews with the ED, one staff, and one resident between 11:30am and 1:12pm. At 12:20 pm, the LPAs conducted a record review and obtained a copy of the resident roster, staff roster, staff schedule, Activity Calendar, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230310122826

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 56 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
9
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
12
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
22
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
26
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
56
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 247-0227
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Regency Palms Oxnard? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.