Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Thousand Oaks, Ventura County, California — state license #565850072, licensed for 82 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

46 homes in view

Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 82 residents · Thousand Oaks, CA · Ventura County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careBedriddenHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #565850072, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
980 Warwick Ave · Thousand Oaks, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 307-7300
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 82 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 82 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPIEE WAIVER FOR 25.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 35 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 14, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 8, 2026
Occupancy at the April 30, 2025 visit
40 of 82 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 16, 2022 to April 30, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 21 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was hospitalized due to a urinary tract infection resulting from staff neglect Facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner Facility staff did not ensure resident had sufficient intake of food Facility staff did not answer resident’s calls for assistance Facility staff yelled at resident Facility staff did not provide records to resident’s responsible person

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 11:45AM, the LPA was greeted by front desk staff and LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 11:57AM, the Administrator Rob Babasanta met with the LPA. On 04/09/2024, A referral was made to Community Care Licensing Division's (CCLD) Investigation Branch (IB) and was accepted as an assignment to obtain medical records and home health records for Resident #1 (R1). During the initial visit conducted on 4/10/2024 between 10:04 a.m. and 12:15 p.m., LPA Teresa Camara conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed the Administrator and obtained pertinent documents. During a subsequent visit conducted on 03/25/2025, LPAs Peraldi, Dulek and Huynh conducted a physical plant tour and conducted interviews with the Administrator, six (6) staff and four (4) residents. The LPAs also requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents during the subsequent visit. Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240409091302
Mar 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/lack of care & supervision – Resident 1 (R1) caused severe injuries to Resident 2 (R2) that led to the death of R2 Facility did not provide basic services to resident(s) in care Facility did not reappraise resident(s) in care Facility retained a resident that required a higher level of care Facility staffing is inadequate

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek, Emily Peraldi, and Quoc Huynh conducted a subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the above listed allegations. LPAs met with Administrator Robloe (Rob) Babasanta at 10:00AM. Entrance interview conducted. On 11/01/2024, LPA Dulek received a telephone call/voicemail from Administrator Babasanta at 12:06PM indicating an incident had occurred between two (2) residents at the facility. LPA spoke to Administrator and Health Services Director (HSD) on the telephone at 02:30PM. LPA arrived at the facility at 03:10PM to conduct a Case Management visit related to the reported incident. During the visit, LPA interviewed HSD at 03:12PM, LPA conducted a health and safety check tour of the facility at 03:19PM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of relevant documents. LPA then received a complaint related to the reported incident and conducted an initial complaint visit on 11/06/2024. During the visit, LPA interviewed Adthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241105163045
Mar 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident care needs not met. Staff did not initiate meeting with resident's responsible person.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver investigation finding. LPA met with Executive Director and reason for the visit was stated. On 09/14/2023, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint with the above allegations. On 9/20/2023, investigation was initiated from approximately 10:30am – 2pm; records were reviewed; interview was conducted with potential witnesses, and staff; ten (10) random resident rooms and common areas were toured. Attempt was made to interview residents during the room inspection. Following is a summary of the investigation findings: Regarding allegations, “Resident care needs not met” and “Staff did not initiate meeting with resident's responsible person”– It was alleged that staff did not follow through in addressing R1’s change in condition. It was also reported that subsequent care plan meeting was never initiated by facility staff. (cont.to LIC9099c). Substhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230914154258
Nov 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are sleeping while on working hours

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose of delivering findings for the above noted allegation. LPA met with Director of Health Services Heather Hampel and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 08/23/2024, LPA interviewed Executive Director (ED) at 10:48AM and LPA conducted a health and safety check tour of the facility at 11:25AM. LPA interviewed staff at 01:20PM, 04:00PM, and 04:15PM and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed documents and interviewed staff telephonically. The following was then determined: It was alleged that staff are sleeping during the overnight (NOC) shift, however, no specific information was provided related to staff members involved nor a time frame indicated. LPA interviewed staff and Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240821111712
Aug 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Physical Abuse - Resident #1 (R1) was physically and emotionally injured by Staff #1 (S1) while under the care and supervision of the facility. Conduct Inimical - Staff #1 (S1) was arrested and charged with misdemeanor elder abuse and being under the influence of a controlled substance.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Rob Babasanta and explained the reason for the visit. On 02/28/2024, the Department received a complaint regarding allegations of physical abuse and conduct inimical. Resident #1 (R1) was physically and emotionally injured by Staff #1 (S1), while under the care and supervision of the facility; and S1 was arrested and charged with a misdemeanor elder abuse and being under the influence of a controlled substance. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Philippe Ryan Miles. (continued on LIC9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240228102452
Mar 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are prohibiting resident from receiving family's phone calls.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the findings pertaining to the allegation listed above. The LPA met with the Director of Healh services, Heather Hampel and explained the reason for the visit. On 02/12/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day visit to investigate allegations listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:50 a.m. the LPA requested records pertaining to the complaint, and interviewed the Administrator from 12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. The LPA interviewed the resident #1(R1) from 12:45 to 1:10 p.m. At the time of the R1’s interview, R1 appeared to be alert and oriented to questions during the interview. Continues on LIC 9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240206125039
Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide daily activities for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day visit to investigate allegation listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:30 a.m. the LPA requested records pertaining to the complaint, and interviewed the Administrator from 12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. The LPA interviewed the resident #1(R1) from 12:45 to 1:10 p.m. At the time of the R1’s interview, R1 appeared to be alert and oriented to questions during the interview. Staff do not provide daily activities for residents. On the allegation that staff are not providing daily activities for residents, the LPA interviewed the Administrator about the activities offered to residents. The Administrator provided a monthly calendar for activities available to residents. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240206125039
20235 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not refund fees according to the resident's admission agreement Staff are billing resident for services not provided

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elsie Campos arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. During today's visit, the LPA along with the ED conducted a tour of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety concerns, conducted an interview with the ED at 11:00 a.m., conducted a file review at 11:20 a.m., and obtained copies of the census, staff schedule, and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231213094351
Nov 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. Upon arrival LPA met with Administrator Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. At approx. 10:30am, LPA conducted physical plant, interviewed staff and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. It was reported that, Facility Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements as it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1)'s responsible party requested a written report pertaining to an incident that occurred on 10/29/2023. Interviews conducted and records review reflected that the facility had self-reported an incident to the Department on 10/30/2023, which stated that on 10/29/2023, R1 and Resident #2 (R2) were involved in a verbal altercation, and R1 stated that R2 had slapped them on the back of the head. Staff separated both R1 and R2 and no further incident or injuries were noted. The incident report athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 28, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231121120147
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately supervise residents, resulting in a resident hitting another resident while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint visit for the above allegation. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Sabrina Pegross and Director of Health Services (DHS) Heather Hampel and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, the LPA along with the ED and DHS conducted a tour of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety concerns at 12:20 p.m., conducted interviews with four staff and five residents between 12:35 p.m. and 2:50 p.m., conducted a file review at 11:45 a.m., and obtained copies of the census, staff schedule, and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. (Report Continued on LIC 9099C...) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231031082743
Oct 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations8typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints15typical 2
Total complaints12typical 7
State visits on file35typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020254512024993202388120225522021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 307-7300

Is Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc licensed?

Yes — Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Thousand Oaks (Ventura County): California license #565850072, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 82 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 14, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and bedridden; it does not list hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 82 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPIEE WAIVER FOR 25.

How much does Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

40 of 82 beds occupied (49%) when the state visited on April 30, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 35 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2021 for Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 30, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was hospitalized due to a urinary tract infection resulting from staff neglect Facility staff did not meet resident’s incontinence care needs Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner Facility staff did not ensure resident had sufficient intake of food Facility staff did not answer resident’s calls for assistance Facility staff yelled at resident Facility staff did not provide records to resident’s responsible person
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 11:45AM, the LPA was greeted by front desk staff and LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 11:57AM, the Administrator Rob Babasanta met with the LPA. On 04/09/2024, A referral was made to Community Care Licensing Division's (CCLD) Investigation Branch (IB) and was accepted as an assignment to obtain medical records and home health records for Resident #1 (R1). During the initial visit conducted on 4/10/2024 between 10:04 a.m. and 12:15 p.m., LPA Teresa Camara conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed the Administrator and obtained pertinent documents. During a subsequent visit conducted on 03/25/2025, LPAs Peraldi, Dulek and Huynh conducted a physical plant tour and conducted interviews with the Administrator, six (6) staff and four (4) residents. The LPAs also requested and obtained copies of pertinent documents during the subsequent visit. RCDSS inspection report, April 30, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240409091302
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/lack of care & supervision – Resident 1 (R1) caused severe injuries to Resident 2 (R2) that led to the death of R2 Facility did not provide basic services to resident(s) in care Facility did not reappraise resident(s) in care Facility retained a resident that required a higher level of care Facility staffing is inadequate
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kelly Dulek, Emily Peraldi, and Quoc Huynh conducted a subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the above listed allegations. LPAs met with Administrator Robloe (Rob) Babasanta at 10:00AM. Entrance interview conducted. On 11/01/2024, LPA Dulek received a telephone call/voicemail from Administrator Babasanta at 12:06PM indicating an incident had occurred between two (2) residents at the facility. LPA spoke to Administrator and Health Services Director (HSD) on the telephone at 02:30PM. LPA arrived at the facility at 03:10PM to conduct a Case Management visit related to the reported incident. During the visit, LPA interviewed HSD at 03:12PM, LPA conducted a health and safety check tour of the facility at 03:19PM, and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of relevant documents. LPA then received a complaint related to the reported incident and conducted an initial complaint visit on 11/06/2024. During the visit, LPA interviewed AdCDSS inspection report, March 25, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241105163045

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident care needs not met. Staff did not initiate meeting with resident's responsible person.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver investigation finding. LPA met with Executive Director and reason for the visit was stated. On 09/14/2023, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint with the above allegations. On 9/20/2023, investigation was initiated from approximately 10:30am – 2pm; records were reviewed; interview was conducted with potential witnesses, and staff; ten (10) random resident rooms and common areas were toured. Attempt was made to interview residents during the room inspection. Following is a summary of the investigation findings: Regarding allegations, “Resident care needs not met” and “Staff did not initiate meeting with resident's responsible person”– It was alleged that staff did not follow through in addressing R1’s change in condition. It was also reported that subsequent care plan meeting was never initiated by facility staff. (cont.to LIC9099c). SubsCDSS inspection report, December 23, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230914154258
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are sleeping while on working hours
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose of delivering findings for the above noted allegation. LPA met with Director of Health Services Heather Hampel and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit conducted on 08/23/2024, LPA interviewed Executive Director (ED) at 10:48AM and LPA conducted a health and safety check tour of the facility at 11:25AM. LPA interviewed staff at 01:20PM, 04:00PM, and 04:15PM and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed documents and interviewed staff telephonically. The following was then determined: It was alleged that staff are sleeping during the overnight (NOC) shift, however, no specific information was provided related to staff members involved nor a time frame indicated. LPA interviewed staff and Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240821111712
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPhysical Abuse - Resident #1 (R1) was physically and emotionally injured by Staff #1 (S1) while under the care and supervision of the facility. Conduct Inimical - Staff #1 (S1) was arrested and charged with misdemeanor elder abuse and being under the influence of a controlled substance.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Rob Babasanta and explained the reason for the visit. On 02/28/2024, the Department received a complaint regarding allegations of physical abuse and conduct inimical. Resident #1 (R1) was physically and emotionally injured by Staff #1 (S1), while under the care and supervision of the facility; and S1 was arrested and charged with a misdemeanor elder abuse and being under the influence of a controlled substance. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Philippe Ryan Miles. (continued on LIC9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240228102452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are prohibiting resident from receiving family's phone calls.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the findings pertaining to the allegation listed above. The LPA met with the Director of Healh services, Heather Hampel and explained the reason for the visit. On 02/12/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day visit to investigate allegations listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:50 a.m. the LPA requested records pertaining to the complaint, and interviewed the Administrator from 12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. The LPA interviewed the resident #1(R1) from 12:45 to 1:10 p.m. At the time of the R1’s interview, R1 appeared to be alert and oriented to questions during the interview. Continues on LIC 9099C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240206125039
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide daily activities for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day visit to investigate allegation listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:30 a.m. the LPA requested records pertaining to the complaint, and interviewed the Administrator from 12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. The LPA interviewed the resident #1(R1) from 12:45 to 1:10 p.m. At the time of the R1’s interview, R1 appeared to be alert and oriented to questions during the interview. Staff do not provide daily activities for residents. On the allegation that staff are not providing daily activities for residents, the LPA interviewed the Administrator about the activities offered to residents. The Administrator provided a monthly calendar for activities available to residents. Continues on LIC 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240206125039

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not refund fees according to the resident's admission agreement Staff are billing resident for services not provided
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elsie Campos arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. During today's visit, the LPA along with the ED conducted a tour of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety concerns, conducted an interview with the ED at 11:00 a.m., conducted a file review at 11:20 a.m., and obtained copies of the census, staff schedule, and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 19, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231213094351
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. Upon arrival LPA met with Administrator Sabrina Pegross and explained the reason for the visit. At approx. 10:30am, LPA conducted physical plant, interviewed staff and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. It was reported that, Facility Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements as it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1)'s responsible party requested a written report pertaining to an incident that occurred on 10/29/2023. Interviews conducted and records review reflected that the facility had self-reported an incident to the Department on 10/30/2023, which stated that on 10/29/2023, R1 and Resident #2 (R2) were involved in a verbal altercation, and R1 stated that R2 had slapped them on the back of the head. Staff separated both R1 and R2 and no further incident or injuries were noted. The incident report aCDSS inspection report, November 28, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231121120147
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not adequately supervise residents, resulting in a resident hitting another resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo arrived unannounced to conduct an initial complaint visit for the above allegation. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Sabrina Pegross and Director of Health Services (DHS) Heather Hampel and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, the LPA along with the ED and DHS conducted a tour of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety concerns at 12:20 p.m., conducted interviews with four staff and five residents between 12:35 p.m. and 2:50 p.m., conducted a file review at 11:45 a.m., and obtained copies of the census, staff schedule, and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. (Report Continued on LIC 9099C...) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231031082743

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 35 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
15
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
12
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
35
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 307-7300
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Silverado Thousand Oaks, Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.