Elms Residential Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Ventura, Ventura County, California — state license #561703573, with a licensed capacity of 54, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 34 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated October 10, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

252 homes in view

Elms Residential Care

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 54 residents · Ventura, CA · Ventura County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #561703573, held since 1989 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
67 East Barnett · Ventura, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 643-2176
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 54 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
54 NON-AMBULATORY.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 42 times and filed 34 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on October 10, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
October 10, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
50 of 54 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 9, 2021 to October 10, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (11), “Unsubstantiated” (14). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 34 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent residents from using illegal drugs in the facility Staff are not mitigating the spread of illness Staff do not provide adequate food service Staff do not safeguard resident funds Staff do not ensure resident hygiene needs are met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Facility Designee Lesley Jamon and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint inspection on 08/14/2025, between 09:00AM and 02:00PM, LPA Esther Cortez toured the facility, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, three (3) residents, one (1) witness, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents. LPA Dulek conducted a subsequent visit on 09/18/2025; LPA interviewed facility designees and Administrator at 11:14AM, toured the facility at 12:11PM and interviewed two (2) staff and seven (7) residents from 12:23PM to 02:15PM. LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with staff and obtained additional relevant documents during an unrelated visit on 08/the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250813233409
Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced 24 hour complaint visit for the above allegation. Upon arrival, LPA met with Administrator, Veronica Pereyra and was explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. During today's inspection, between 09:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., the LPA toured the facility, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, three (3) residents, one (1) witness, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250813233409
Apr 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff verbally abuses and threatens residents. Staff do not provide adequate amount of food to residents. Staff did not prevent drug activity on the premises. Resident is being utilized as staff. Licensee is financially abusing residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations. LPA initially met with facility staff Neil Cotton and later met with the acting administrator Julie Anos. LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA started interviews at 1:30 p.m. LPA interviewed five staff and five residents. LPA reviewed P&I monies at 3:40 p.m. Regarding the allegation staff do not provide an adequate amount of food to residents: Staff stated residents are served three meals and three snacks a day. Residents can request second servings if they are still hungry after their initial serving. They also have a refrigerator where residents can store their own food. Residents confirmed they get three meals and three snacks per day. They can ask for seconds if they are still hungry. They can also request other options if they don't like what is being served. Based on these interviews this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this timethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240809141502
20245 state visits · 8 documents
Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal drug use at the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. On 12/21/2023, Community Care Licensing Division received a complaint alleging illegal drug use at the facility. It was reported that there is illegal drug use occurring at this facility and that “marijuana and worse drugs than pot are being used at this board and care”. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing (CCL) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Johnny Canto. On 12/22/2023, LPA Chochian conducted initial complaint visit to this facility for the above complaint allegation. LPA met with staff Marysol Magallanas and later with Administrator Fe Higgins. During the initial visit, at approximately 11am, LPA toured the facility with staff. At approximately 12pm, LPA reviewed records and obtained copies of available records. During the resident room tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231221134959
Jul 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not keep the facility free of bedbugs Staff did not provide emergency personnel resident records Staff did not keep the facility clean and sanitary

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. Regarding allegation “Staff did not keep the facility free of bedbugs” and “Staff did not keep the facility clean and sanitary”. On 1/22/2024, at approximately 3:25pm, LPA and the administrator conducted a tour of the facility and checked facility common areas and random resident rooms. The LPA also conducted random resident interviews during the resident room tours from approximately 3:30p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The LPA conducted an inspection of eight (8) resident rooms and spoke with residents in each room. The interview with residents revealed the following: eight (8) out of eight (8) residents expressed that they have experienced bedbugs in their room in the past and continue to have issues with bed bugs. Residents confirmed that an exterminator comes around every month or so to spray; howethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240119073807
Jul 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Facility staff did not notify resident's responsible person of injury to resident. Facility staff are not safeguarding confidential records. Facility staff do not clean bedroom floors.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. On 01/19/2024, Community Care Licensing Division received an allegation that “Facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident”. Per the Reporting Party (RP) it was discovered on 12/27/2023, that Resident #1 (R1) had injured R1s right foot. R1 was taken to the Emergency Room (ER), where it was discovered that R1 had broken R1’s leg in multiple places. The injury was noted to be old given the bruising. On 01/22/2024, this case was referred to the Investigations Branch and assigned to Investigator Veronica Padilla. On 01/22/2024, LPA Chochian conducted the initial complaint visit. LPA met with staff Marysol Magallanas and later with Administrator Fe Higgins. During the initial visit, at approximately 3:45pm, LPA toured the facility with staff. At approximately 5:30pm, LPA reviewedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240119160628
Jul 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. On 03/14/2024, Community Care Licensing Division received an allegation of “Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents”. It was reported that someone summonsed emergency personnel due to a resident observed unable to be woken and yellowish in color. Upon arrival of emergency personnel, the alleged resident was found sleeping deeply and was easily woken. It was reported that on this incident day no staff/employees could be found inside the facility; no historian of the alleged resident was available, and no one could be identified as the 911 caller. It was stated that the population of this facility is vulnerable at best and it appears many if not all of the residents have cognitive impairments of some kind and should not be left alone. On 03/20/2024, LPA Chochianthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240314113625
Jul 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have hot water Staff did not ensure there was enough food for residents in care Staff make residents clean the facility Staff are not properly cleaning residents' rooms

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a complaint visit to this facility for the above listed allegations. LPA met with facility staff Irina Zendejas and Licensee/Administrator Fe Higgins. Entrance interview conducted. LPA interviewed both Licensee/Administrator and facility staff at 11:15AM, toured the facility with Licensee at 11:55AM. LPA observed lunch being served and residents eating in the dining room during facility tour. LPA interviewed facility residents and staff from 12:15PM to 02:20PM. The following was then determined: Allegation: "Facility does not have hot water:" Interview revealed that on 06/21/2024, residents informed the facility staff that there was no hot water available in their restrooms. Facility staff then tested the water and confirmed the water was tepid and not heating properly. Maintenance staff responded promptly and discovered that the water heater/broiler was Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240624084221
Jun 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility electrical panel is malfunctioning

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a complaint visit to this facility for the above complaint allegation. LPA met with staff Irina Zendejas and reason for visit was discussed. Owner/Administrator Fe Higgins was unavailable to met with LPA during todays visit. LPA toured the facility with Maintenance staff Ariel Vargs. Mr. Vargas confirmed that the facility electrical panel was malfunctioning last week and he has since taken care of the issue which was causing the alarm panel to sound. According to Mr. Vargs the fire department suggested that the fire panel spare battery be replaced since it is malfunctioning. Mr. Vargas replaced the spare battery and the panel is operating properly now. Based on interviews and observation, allegation "Facility electrical panel is malfunctiong" is deemed substantiated at this time. Following deficiency was observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the CA Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and apthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240314113625
20234 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has a bedbug infestation.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day visit to investigate the allegation described above. The LPA met with Administrator Fe Higgins at 1:30 p.m. and explained the reason for the visit. At 1:45 the LPA and the administrator conducted a tour of the facility. The LPA conducted residents’ interviews from 1:50 p.m. to 2:54 p.m. At 3:15 p.m. the LPA requested records pertaining to the investigation. At 3:30 p.m. the LPA interviewed the administrator. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230925123938
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are not receiving their medications

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a 10-Day initial complaint visit to the facility at 10:50 a.m. The LPA was greeted by Administrator Fe Higgins and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA toured the physical plant with administrator Fe, and obtained pertinent documents at 11:35 a.m., and interviewed five (5) randomly chosen residents between 11:40 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. and interviewed the administrator throughout the visit. Report will Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230913095109
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents' medications.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a 10-Day initial complaint visit to the facility at 10:50 a.m. The LPA was greeted by Administrator Fe Higgins and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA toured the physical plant with administrator Fe, and obtained pertinent documents at 11:35 a.m., and interviewed five (5) randomly chosen residents between 11:40 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. and interviewed the administrator throughout the visit. Report will Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230907164110
Aug 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations10typical 1
Substantiated complaints17typical 2
Total complaints22typical 7
State visits on file42typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1989.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025441202458320231115420224512021352
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Elms Residential Care licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Elms Residential Care in Ventura (Ventura County), California license #561703573, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 54 residents. State records list 34 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated October 10, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Elms Residential Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Elms Residential Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record54 NON-AMBULATORY.

How much does Elms Residential Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Elms Residential Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Elms Residential Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Elms Residential Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

50 of 54 beds occupied (93%) when the state visited on October 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Elms Residential Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 42 state visits and 34 dated documents since 2021 for Elms Residential Care; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not prevent residents from using illegal drugs in the facility Staff are not mitigating the spread of illness Staff do not provide adequate food service Staff do not safeguard resident funds Staff do not ensure resident hygiene needs are met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Facility Designee Lesley Jamon and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint inspection on 08/14/2025, between 09:00AM and 02:00PM, LPA Esther Cortez toured the facility, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, three (3) residents, one (1) witness, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents. LPA Dulek conducted a subsequent visit on 09/18/2025; LPA interviewed facility designees and Administrator at 11:14AM, toured the facility at 12:11PM and interviewed two (2) staff and seven (7) residents from 12:23PM to 02:15PM. LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with staff and obtained additional relevant documents during an unrelated visit on 08/CDSS inspection report, October 10, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250813233409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not adequately trained
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced 24 hour complaint visit for the above allegation. Upon arrival, LPA met with Administrator, Veronica Pereyra and was explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. During today's inspection, between 09:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., the LPA toured the facility, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, three (3) residents, one (1) witness, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 14, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250813233409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff verbally abuses and threatens residents. Staff do not provide adequate amount of food to residents. Staff did not prevent drug activity on the premises. Resident is being utilized as staff. Licensee is financially abusing residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations. LPA initially met with facility staff Neil Cotton and later met with the acting administrator Julie Anos. LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA started interviews at 1:30 p.m. LPA interviewed five staff and five residents. LPA reviewed P&I monies at 3:40 p.m. Regarding the allegation staff do not provide an adequate amount of food to residents: Staff stated residents are served three meals and three snacks a day. Residents can request second servings if they are still hungry after their initial serving. They also have a refrigerator where residents can store their own food. Residents confirmed they get three meals and three snacks per day. They can ask for seconds if they are still hungry. They can also request other options if they don't like what is being served. Based on these interviews this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this timeCDSS inspection report, April 4, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240809141502

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal drug use at the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. On 12/21/2023, Community Care Licensing Division received a complaint alleging illegal drug use at the facility. It was reported that there is illegal drug use occurring at this facility and that “marijuana and worse drugs than pot are being used at this board and care”. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing (CCL) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Johnny Canto. On 12/22/2023, LPA Chochian conducted initial complaint visit to this facility for the above complaint allegation. LPA met with staff Marysol Magallanas and later with Administrator Fe Higgins. During the initial visit, at approximately 11am, LPA toured the facility with staff. At approximately 12pm, LPA reviewed records and obtained copies of available records. During the resident room toCDSS inspection report, July 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231221134959
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not keep the facility free of bedbugs Staff did not provide emergency personnel resident records Staff did not keep the facility clean and sanitary
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. Regarding allegation “Staff did not keep the facility free of bedbugs” and “Staff did not keep the facility clean and sanitary”. On 1/22/2024, at approximately 3:25pm, LPA and the administrator conducted a tour of the facility and checked facility common areas and random resident rooms. The LPA also conducted random resident interviews during the resident room tours from approximately 3:30p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The LPA conducted an inspection of eight (8) resident rooms and spoke with residents in each room. The interview with residents revealed the following: eight (8) out of eight (8) residents expressed that they have experienced bedbugs in their room in the past and continue to have issues with bed bugs. Residents confirmed that an exterminator comes around every month or so to spray; howeCDSS inspection report, July 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240119073807
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Facility staff did not notify resident's responsible person of injury to resident. Facility staff are not safeguarding confidential records. Facility staff do not clean bedroom floors.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. On 01/19/2024, Community Care Licensing Division received an allegation that “Facility staff did not seek medical attention for resident”. Per the Reporting Party (RP) it was discovered on 12/27/2023, that Resident #1 (R1) had injured R1s right foot. R1 was taken to the Emergency Room (ER), where it was discovered that R1 had broken R1’s leg in multiple places. The injury was noted to be old given the bruising. On 01/22/2024, this case was referred to the Investigations Branch and assigned to Investigator Veronica Padilla. On 01/22/2024, LPA Chochian conducted the initial complaint visit. LPA met with staff Marysol Magallanas and later with Administrator Fe Higgins. During the initial visit, at approximately 3:45pm, LPA toured the facility with staff. At approximately 5:30pm, LPA reviewedCDSS inspection report, July 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240119160628
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Irina Zendeja. The reason for the visit was explained. On 03/14/2024, Community Care Licensing Division received an allegation of “Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision of the residents”. It was reported that someone summonsed emergency personnel due to a resident observed unable to be woken and yellowish in color. Upon arrival of emergency personnel, the alleged resident was found sleeping deeply and was easily woken. It was reported that on this incident day no staff/employees could be found inside the facility; no historian of the alleged resident was available, and no one could be identified as the 911 caller. It was stated that the population of this facility is vulnerable at best and it appears many if not all of the residents have cognitive impairments of some kind and should not be left alone. On 03/20/2024, LPA ChochianCDSS inspection report, July 30, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240314113625
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have hot water Staff did not ensure there was enough food for residents in care Staff make residents clean the facility Staff are not properly cleaning residents' rooms
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a complaint visit to this facility for the above listed allegations. LPA met with facility staff Irina Zendejas and Licensee/Administrator Fe Higgins. Entrance interview conducted. LPA interviewed both Licensee/Administrator and facility staff at 11:15AM, toured the facility with Licensee at 11:55AM. LPA observed lunch being served and residents eating in the dining room during facility tour. LPA interviewed facility residents and staff from 12:15PM to 02:20PM. The following was then determined: Allegation: "Facility does not have hot water:" Interview revealed that on 06/21/2024, residents informed the facility staff that there was no hot water available in their restrooms. Facility staff then tested the water and confirmed the water was tepid and not heating properly. Maintenance staff responded promptly and discovered that the water heater/broiler was Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 1, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240624084221
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility electrical panel is malfunctioning
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a complaint visit to this facility for the above complaint allegation. LPA met with staff Irina Zendejas and reason for visit was discussed. Owner/Administrator Fe Higgins was unavailable to met with LPA during todays visit. LPA toured the facility with Maintenance staff Ariel Vargs. Mr. Vargas confirmed that the facility electrical panel was malfunctioning last week and he has since taken care of the issue which was causing the alarm panel to sound. According to Mr. Vargs the fire department suggested that the fire panel spare battery be replaced since it is malfunctioning. Mr. Vargas replaced the spare battery and the panel is operating properly now. Based on interviews and observation, allegation "Facility electrical panel is malfunctiong" is deemed substantiated at this time. Following deficiency was observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the CA Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and apCDSS inspection report, March 20, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240314113625

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has a bedbug infestation.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day visit to investigate the allegation described above. The LPA met with Administrator Fe Higgins at 1:30 p.m. and explained the reason for the visit. At 1:45 the LPA and the administrator conducted a tour of the facility. The LPA conducted residents’ interviews from 1:50 p.m. to 2:54 p.m. At 3:15 p.m. the LPA requested records pertaining to the investigation. At 3:30 p.m. the LPA interviewed the administrator. Continues on LIC 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230925123938
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not receiving their medications
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a 10-Day initial complaint visit to the facility at 10:50 a.m. The LPA was greeted by Administrator Fe Higgins and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA toured the physical plant with administrator Fe, and obtained pertinent documents at 11:35 a.m., and interviewed five (5) randomly chosen residents between 11:40 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. and interviewed the administrator throughout the visit. Report will Continue on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230913095109
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged residents' medications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a 10-Day initial complaint visit to the facility at 10:50 a.m. The LPA was greeted by Administrator Fe Higgins and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA toured the physical plant with administrator Fe, and obtained pertinent documents at 11:35 a.m., and interviewed five (5) randomly chosen residents between 11:40 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. and interviewed the administrator throughout the visit. Report will Continue on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230907164110
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing to met residents care needs Residents are used as substitutes for required staff Facility staff intimidate and retaliate against resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a 10-Day initial complaint visit to the facility at 7:45a.m. The administrator and four (4) staff were present when the LPA arrived. The LPA was greeted by Administrator Fe Higgins and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA toured the physical plant with administrator Fe, and obtained pertinent documents between 8:10 a.m. and 8:25 a.m., interviewed five (5) randomly chosen residents, four (4) staff between 08:30 a.m. and 09:30 a.m., had one phone interview at 10:04 a.m., and interviewed the administrator throughout the visit. Regarding the allegation Insufficient staffing to meet residents care needs: All of the residents interviewed stated there is sufficient staffing to meet their needs. They also indicated that they are independent and don’t need assistance from staff. In addition, resident interviews indicated that even if staff call in sick, there is always staff and/or the administrator at the facility to assist theCDSS inspection report, July 20, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230712152744
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has an infestation of bed bugs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to the facility at 01:00 p.m. The LPA met with Designee Percy Tabing and discussed the reason for the visit. Administrator Fe Higgings arrived shortly after and was informed of the reason for the visit. During today's visit the LPA toured the facility with designee Percy between 1:25 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. and requested copies of pertinent documents. During the tour the LPA interviewed ten (10) random residents and two (2) random staff. Report will continue on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 23, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230621094948
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not sufficiently staffed to meet the needs of residents in care. Facility staff do not ensure residents are taking their medications. Facility staff are not assisting residents with showers.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint visit regarding the above noted allegations. LPA met with licensee/administrator Fe Higgins and explained the reason for the visit. LPA interviewed ten (10) randomly chosen residents between 10:55 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. LPA interviewed administrator at 10:40 a.m. LPA interviewed three (3) staff between 11:35 a.m. and 12:46 p.m. Regarding the allegation facility is not sufficiently staffed to meet the needs of residents in care: All of the residents stated their needs are always met by facility staff and the administrator. They indicated sometimes staff do not show up to work and the administrator takes on those duties. However, even if staff call in sick, they still have all their needs met. Staff at the facility ensure they are fed, given their medications and assist them with their medical appointments. All of the staff who were interviewed stated they feel there (continued on 9099-C; page 2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 1, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230523161635
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff does not serve nutritious meals. Staff do not provide resident with basic laundry service
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility at 7:30 a.m. LPA was greeted by Night Supervisor Reynaldo Tabing and the reason for the visit was explained. LPA also met with Interim Administrative Assistant, Karena Higgins, and Assistant Manager, Angie Perez during the visit. LPA contacted facility administrator Fe Higgins who was unable to be present during today’s visit. On 4/12/2023, LPA toured the facility with Staff Angie Perez between 7:53AM – 8:05AM, after the tour LPA observed breakfast service been provided to the residents in the dining room. A tour of the laundry room was also conducted at 10:30AM. Additionally, LPA conducted a file review and requested copies of pertinent documents at 12:20 p.m. Between 8:12 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. LPA interviewed sixteen (16) random residents and four (4) random staff. Moreover, LPA observed lunch service been provided to the resident at 12:00 p.m. Report will continue on LIC9099-C SubstantiatCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230405151719
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate meal service to residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kasandra Lopez and Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an initial complaint visit at 2:29p.m. When the LPAs arrived, they met with staff member Angelina Perez and explained the reason for the visit. Met with Administrator Fe Higgins shortly after and explained the reason for the visit as well. During todays inspection, the LPAs and Administrator toured the Kitchen and food storage area between 2:30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m., obtained documents at 2:46 p.m., and the LPAs interviewed (7) seven residents between 2:47 p.m., and 3:14p.m. Report will continue on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 16, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230309082349
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect and lack of supervision resulted in a resident injuring another resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived unannounced for an initial 10-day visit. At 9:51 a.m., the LPA met with staff and the Administrator Fe Higgins and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:09 a.m., the LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator. At 10:14 a.m., the LPA along with staff toured the facility. Between 10:21 a.m. and 11:32 a.m., the LPA interviewed three (3) staff and seven (7) residents. At 12:00 p.m., the LPA obtained pertinent documents. At 2:39 p.m., the LPA interviewed the resident’s social worker. At 3:57 p.m., the LPA attempted to interview Individual #1 (I1). Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 6, 2023 · control 29-AS-20221230145649

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 42 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
10
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
17
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
22
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
42
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 643-2176
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Elms Residential Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.