Skyline Place Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sonora, Tuolumne County, California — state license #552701305, licensed for 135 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated February 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2023, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 9, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 29, 2024 to February 9, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Feb 9, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in a resident harming another resident Unauthorized charge to resident's account
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA Lund met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. Census 107 Allegation: Lack of supervision resulted in a resident harming another resident. It was alleged that due to lack of supervision it resulted in a resident harming another resident. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was determined that on 12/11/2025, R1 and R2 were in an elevator traveling to dinner. R2 was using an assistive device while exiting the elevator, at which time R1 became impatient and pulled R2’s hair and struck R2 with a cane. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251212161459
Feb 9, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 9, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 1, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide adequate resident care.
On 10/1/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais, explained the purpose of the visit, and conducted an interview. Allegation: Staff does not provide adequate resident care. On 6/5/2025, LPA Arielle Pascua conducted the 10-day site visit and interviewed two staff. S1 stated that a resident’s family had recently been concerned about them, but S1 had explained to the family that the resident’s health was declining and that they were developing new behavioral expressions. S1 stated that no other issues had been brought to their attention. S2 stated that there were no complaints with any families regarding care at this time. On 9/8/2025 and 9/10/2025, LPA Lindstrom interviewed three family members and three staff members. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250530110109
Oct 1, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 15, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff leave residents in soiled diapers/linens for extended period of time.
On 9/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Lisa Rios arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint/deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPA interviewed three family members (F2, F4, and F5), who reported that they had had no issues with incontinence care at the facility. On 9/8/2025, LPA interviewed two staff (S6 and S8), who reported having observed residents receiving inadequate incontinence care. S6 stated that they had seen some residents in soaked briefs every day or every other day. S8 stated that they had observed bedbound residents left in soiled briefs and some residents with skin breakdown. (Continued on 9099-D) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820090538
Sep 15, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer residents' medications as prescribe. Staff providing care and supervision while impaired.
On 9/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Lisa Rios arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint/deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff did not administer residents' medication as prescribed On 9/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lindstrom reviewed the facility’s electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for all facility residents for the month of May 2025. The EMAR showed no pattern of missed medication administration in the resident population for both the morning and afternoon passes on any one day in May. LPA Lindstrom interviewed three family members (F2, F4, and F5) and three staff (S4, S6, and S8), all of whom stated that they had not observed any issues with medication administration. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820170659
Sep 15, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not report incident to appropriate parties in a timely manner
On 9/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint and deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. On 8/27/2025, LPA Lindstrom interviewed S1, who stated that a med tech noticed that a resident was missing from the facility about 10:30 AM on 8/23/2025. LPA Lindstrom received a phone call and voice mail from S1 at 11:41 AM on 8/23/2025 stating that a resident was missing from the facility, and a second call from S1 at 3:20 PM on 8/23/2025 stating that the resident was still missing, that the elopement had been reported to law enforcement, and that Search and Rescue were helping with the search. On 8/26/2025, S1 submitted an LIC624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report to the Department about R1’s rescue. On 8/29/2025, S1 submitted an additional LIC624 to the Department that documented R1’s elopement and the subsequent facility responthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825115709
Sep 15, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 27, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision, resulting in resident eloping from facility
On 8/27/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPAs interviewed Pais and reviewed two LIC 624s submitted by the facility about a resident elopement that occurred on Saturday 8/23/2025. Pais stated that on the morning of 8/23/2025, a med tech went to the resident’s room about 8:30 AM to pass medications. The resident’s spouse stated that she was sleeping. When the med tech returned about 9:30 AM to pass medications, the resident’s spouse stated that the resident was out walking their dog. When the med tech returned about 10:30 AM to pass medications, the resident’s spouse stated that the resident had not returned to their room. The med tech called the Administrator to report the resident’s absence and the facility began their elopement protocol. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825115709
Jun 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 6, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 6, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 26, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide timely medical care
On 02/26/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility to present findings regarding a Complaint. LPA Campbell met with Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide timely medical care, on 09/10/24, a complaint was filed with the Department alleging neglect/lack of care and supervision. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with staff and reviewed files for S4 and R1. When interviewed, staff reported that S4 did not check on R1 and other residents when requested due to COVID-19. Based on these findings, it was SUBSTANTIATED that staff did not provide timely medical care. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. This incident is currently under review and a civil penalty may apply based on 1569.49(f) H&S. Failure to correct the deficiencies may alsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241002164831
Feb 26, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is kept free of odors Staff does not ensure residents rooms are kept in clean, sanitary conditions Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner
On 02/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an investigation on a complaint that was submitted to the Department on 02/24/25. LPA Campbell met with Valerie Pais, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA Campbell observed rooms, hallways and stairwells, reviewed client and staff rosters and interviewed a random selection of residents. Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure the facility is kept free of odors, LPA Campbell observed odors in two of the six rooms selected for observation. The rooms were observed to be clean without obstructions but food was observed to have been left out in R2's room for a pet cat and R3 had been recently changed. Because residents prefer to keep their doors closed, LPA Campbell observed no odors in the facility hallways or common areas. Report continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250224103421
Jan 8, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 8, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 2, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff served unsafe food
On 12/2/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to open a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Jensen interviewed the Executive Director who advised that residents began presenting with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms on 11/26/24 in the PM. By 11/29/24 there were 26 residents and 13 staff members with GI symptoms. As of this date there are 33 residents with GI symptoms and 25 staff. Residents are returning from the hospital with discharges paperwork that states they have an unspecified gastrointestinal virus. In the presence of LPA the Executive Director contacted the Administrative Director of Acute Services with Adventist hospital who confirmed that stool samples were taken from some residents and a panel of testing was conducted to rule out food bourne illness. Tests to date have come back negative for food bourne illness. Cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241127112128
Nov 7, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 23, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure call signal system requests are answered in a timely manner
On 10/23/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue an investigation in to a complaint investigation related to the above listed allegations. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA Jensen reviewed care response logs and emails between the responsible party for resident 1 (R1) and facility staff. During the course of an interview with the Executive Director, LPA Jensen asked what a reasonable amount of time would be for staff to respond to a resident that activates their call pendant. The Executive Director responded that response times can vary depending on what else is happening in the facility such as a resident emergency for example but generally a call should be responded to within 15-20 minutes. LPA Jensen reviewed response logs for R1 for the week of 7/21/24 to 7/27/24. During that period of time R1 activated the call pendant 16 timesthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240807163148
Jul 2, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 29, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are being met. Facility is charging resident for services not provided.
On 4/29/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Aimee Jo Mattson and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation the Department conducted interviews with a Home Health Nurse, the facility Regional Nurse, the Executive Director and resident 1 (R1). The Department also reviewed documentation that includes an Admission Agreement, Needs and Service Plans, Home Health documentation, facility policy, in-service training records, and resident chart notes. Based on the facility bathing policy, "staff will ensure resident's participation to bathe or shower on a routine basis...Twice weekly and as needed will be scheduled." Based on LPA Jensen's review of the skin observation sheet R1 was bathed 6 times in ten weeks. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240208161140
Dec 28, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 12, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 31, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Skyline Place Senior Living licensed?
Yes — Skyline Place Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sonora (Tuolumne County): California license #552701305, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 135 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 9, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.
Can Skyline Place Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Skyline Place Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.135 NON-AMBULATORY,OF WHICH 35 MAY BE BERIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (12).
How much does Skyline Place Senior Living cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Skyline Place Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Tuolumne County typically runs $4,000–$8,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$7,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Skyline Place Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Skyline Place Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
107 of 135 beds occupied (79%) when the state visited on February 9, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Skyline Place Senior Living?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2023 for Skyline Place Senior Living; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 9, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(209) 288-4630Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Skyline Place Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.