Skyline Place Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sonora, Tuolumne County, California — state license #552701305, licensed for 135 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated February 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Skyline Place Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 135 residents · Sonora, CA · Tuolumne County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #552701305, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
12877 Sylva Lane · Sonora, Tuolumne County
Phone
(209) 288-4630
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 135 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.135 NON-AMBULATORY,OF WHICH 35 MAY BE BERIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (12).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 9, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
April 3, 2026
Occupancy at the February 9, 2026 visit
107 of 135 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 29, 2024 to February 9, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 25 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 3 documents
Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in a resident harming another resident Unauthorized charge to resident's account

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA Lund met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. Census 107 Allegation: Lack of supervision resulted in a resident harming another resident. It was alleged that due to lack of supervision it resulted in a resident harming another resident. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was determined that on 12/11/2025, R1 and R2 were in an elevator traveling to dinner. R2 was using an assistive device while exiting the elevator, at which time R1 became impatient and pulled R2’s hair and struck R2 with a cane. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251212161459
Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 14 documents
Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide adequate resident care.

On 10/1/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais, explained the purpose of the visit, and conducted an interview. Allegation: Staff does not provide adequate resident care. On 6/5/2025, LPA Arielle Pascua conducted the 10-day site visit and interviewed two staff. S1 stated that a resident’s family had recently been concerned about them, but S1 had explained to the family that the resident’s health was declining and that they were developing new behavioral expressions. S1 stated that no other issues had been brought to their attention. S2 stated that there were no complaints with any families regarding care at this time. On 9/8/2025 and 9/10/2025, LPA Lindstrom interviewed three family members and three staff members. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250530110109
Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff leave residents in soiled diapers/linens for extended period of time.

On 9/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Lisa Rios arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint/deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPA interviewed three family members (F2, F4, and F5), who reported that they had had no issues with incontinence care at the facility. On 9/8/2025, LPA interviewed two staff (S6 and S8), who reported having observed residents receiving inadequate incontinence care. S6 stated that they had seen some residents in soaked briefs every day or every other day. S8 stated that they had observed bedbound residents left in soiled briefs and some residents with skin breakdown. (Continued on 9099-D) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820090538
Sep 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer residents' medications as prescribe. Staff providing care and supervision while impaired.

On 9/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Lisa Rios arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint/deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff did not administer residents' medication as prescribed On 9/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lindstrom reviewed the facility’s electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for all facility residents for the month of May 2025. The EMAR showed no pattern of missed medication administration in the resident population for both the morning and afternoon passes on any one day in May. LPA Lindstrom interviewed three family members (F2, F4, and F5) and three staff (S4, S6, and S8), all of whom stated that they had not observed any issues with medication administration. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820170659
Sep 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not report incident to appropriate parties in a timely manner

On 9/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint and deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. On 8/27/2025, LPA Lindstrom interviewed S1, who stated that a med tech noticed that a resident was missing from the facility about 10:30 AM on 8/23/2025. LPA Lindstrom received a phone call and voice mail from S1 at 11:41 AM on 8/23/2025 stating that a resident was missing from the facility, and a second call from S1 at 3:20 PM on 8/23/2025 stating that the resident was still missing, that the elopement had been reported to law enforcement, and that Search and Rescue were helping with the search. On 8/26/2025, S1 submitted an LIC624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report to the Department about R1’s rescue. On 8/29/2025, S1 submitted an additional LIC624 to the Department that documented R1’s elopement and the subsequent facility responthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825115709
Sep 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision, resulting in resident eloping from facility

On 8/27/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPAs interviewed Pais and reviewed two LIC 624s submitted by the facility about a resident elopement that occurred on Saturday 8/23/2025. Pais stated that on the morning of 8/23/2025, a med tech went to the resident’s room about 8:30 AM to pass medications. The resident’s spouse stated that she was sleeping. When the med tech returned about 9:30 AM to pass medications, the resident’s spouse stated that the resident was out walking their dog. When the med tech returned about 10:30 AM to pass medications, the resident’s spouse stated that the resident had not returned to their room. The med tech called the Administrator to report the resident’s absence and the facility began their elopement protocol. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825115709
Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide timely medical care

On 02/26/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility to present findings regarding a Complaint. LPA Campbell met with Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide timely medical care, on 09/10/24, a complaint was filed with the Department alleging neglect/lack of care and supervision. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with staff and reviewed files for S4 and R1. When interviewed, staff reported that S4 did not check on R1 and other residents when requested due to COVID-19. Based on these findings, it was SUBSTANTIATED that staff did not provide timely medical care. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. This incident is currently under review and a civil penalty may apply based on 1569.49(f) H&S. Failure to correct the deficiencies may alsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241002164831
Feb 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is kept free of odors Staff does not ensure residents rooms are kept in clean, sanitary conditions Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner

On 02/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an investigation on a complaint that was submitted to the Department on 02/24/25. LPA Campbell met with Valerie Pais, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA Campbell observed rooms, hallways and stairwells, reviewed client and staff rosters and interviewed a random selection of residents. Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure the facility is kept free of odors, LPA Campbell observed odors in two of the six rooms selected for observation. The rooms were observed to be clean without obstructions but food was observed to have been left out in R2's room for a pet cat and R3 had been recently changed. Because residents prefer to keep their doors closed, LPA Campbell observed no odors in the facility hallways or common areas. Report continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250224103421
Jan 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff served unsafe food

On 12/2/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to open a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Jensen interviewed the Executive Director who advised that residents began presenting with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms on 11/26/24 in the PM. By 11/29/24 there were 26 residents and 13 staff members with GI symptoms. As of this date there are 33 residents with GI symptoms and 25 staff. Residents are returning from the hospital with discharges paperwork that states they have an unspecified gastrointestinal virus. In the presence of LPA the Executive Director contacted the Administrative Director of Acute Services with Adventist hospital who confirmed that stool samples were taken from some residents and a panel of testing was conducted to rule out food bourne illness. Tests to date have come back negative for food bourne illness. Cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241127112128
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure call signal system requests are answered in a timely manner

On 10/23/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue an investigation in to a complaint investigation related to the above listed allegations. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA Jensen reviewed care response logs and emails between the responsible party for resident 1 (R1) and facility staff. During the course of an interview with the Executive Director, LPA Jensen asked what a reasonable amount of time would be for staff to respond to a resident that activates their call pendant. The Executive Director responded that response times can vary depending on what else is happening in the facility such as a resident emergency for example but generally a call should be responded to within 15-20 minutes. LPA Jensen reviewed response logs for R1 for the week of 7/21/24 to 7/27/24. During that period of time R1 activated the call pendant 16 timesthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240807163148
Jul 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are being met. Facility is charging resident for services not provided.

On 4/29/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Aimee Jo Mattson and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation the Department conducted interviews with a Home Health Nurse, the facility Regional Nurse, the Executive Director and resident 1 (R1). The Department also reviewed documentation that includes an Admission Agreement, Needs and Service Plans, Home Health documentation, facility policy, in-service training records, and resident chart notes. Based on the facility bathing policy, "staff will ensure resident's participation to bathe or shower on a routine basis...Twice weekly and as needed will be scheduled." Based on LPA Jensen's review of the skin observation sheet R1 was bathed 6 times in ten weeks. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240208161140
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints8typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file30typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261312025714220245522023330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$8,000 /mo
our estimate — broad statewide California range, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 288-4630

Is Skyline Place Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Skyline Place Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sonora (Tuolumne County): California license #552701305, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 135 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 9, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Skyline Place Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Skyline Place Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.135 NON-AMBULATORY,OF WHICH 35 MAY BE BERIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (12).

How much does Skyline Place Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Skyline Place Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Tuolumne County typically runs $4,000–$8,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$7,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Skyline Place Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Skyline Place Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

107 of 135 beds occupied (79%) when the state visited on February 9, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Skyline Place Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2023 for Skyline Place Senior Living; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 9, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in a resident harming another resident Unauthorized charge to resident's account
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA Lund met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. Census 107 Allegation: Lack of supervision resulted in a resident harming another resident. It was alleged that due to lack of supervision it resulted in a resident harming another resident. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was determined that on 12/11/2025, R1 and R2 were in an elevator traveling to dinner. R2 was using an assistive device while exiting the elevator, at which time R1 became impatient and pulled R2’s hair and struck R2 with a cane. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251212161459

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide adequate resident care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/1/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais, explained the purpose of the visit, and conducted an interview. Allegation: Staff does not provide adequate resident care. On 6/5/2025, LPA Arielle Pascua conducted the 10-day site visit and interviewed two staff. S1 stated that a resident’s family had recently been concerned about them, but S1 had explained to the family that the resident’s health was declining and that they were developing new behavioral expressions. S1 stated that no other issues had been brought to their attention. S2 stated that there were no complaints with any families regarding care at this time. On 9/8/2025 and 9/10/2025, LPA Lindstrom interviewed three family members and three staff members. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250530110109
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff leave residents in soiled diapers/linens for extended period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Lisa Rios arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint/deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPA interviewed three family members (F2, F4, and F5), who reported that they had had no issues with incontinence care at the facility. On 9/8/2025, LPA interviewed two staff (S6 and S8), who reported having observed residents receiving inadequate incontinence care. S6 stated that they had seen some residents in soaked briefs every day or every other day. S8 stated that they had observed bedbound residents left in soiled briefs and some residents with skin breakdown. (Continued on 9099-D) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820090538
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer residents' medications as prescribe. Staff providing care and supervision while impaired.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Lisa Rios arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint/deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff did not administer residents' medication as prescribed On 9/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lindstrom reviewed the facility’s electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for all facility residents for the month of May 2025. The EMAR showed no pattern of missed medication administration in the resident population for both the morning and afternoon passes on any one day in May. LPA Lindstrom interviewed three family members (F2, F4, and F5) and three staff (S4, S6, and S8), all of whom stated that they had not observed any issues with medication administration. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820170659
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not report incident to appropriate parties in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived at the facility unannounced to follow-up on this complaint and deliver complaint findings. LPA Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. On 8/27/2025, LPA Lindstrom interviewed S1, who stated that a med tech noticed that a resident was missing from the facility about 10:30 AM on 8/23/2025. LPA Lindstrom received a phone call and voice mail from S1 at 11:41 AM on 8/23/2025 stating that a resident was missing from the facility, and a second call from S1 at 3:20 PM on 8/23/2025 stating that the resident was still missing, that the elopement had been reported to law enforcement, and that Search and Rescue were helping with the search. On 8/26/2025, S1 submitted an LIC624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report to the Department about R1’s rescue. On 8/29/2025, S1 submitted an additional LIC624 to the Department that documented R1’s elopement and the subsequent facility responCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825115709
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision, resulting in resident eloping from facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8/27/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Lindstrom met with Administrator Valarie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. The LPAs interviewed Pais and reviewed two LIC 624s submitted by the facility about a resident elopement that occurred on Saturday 8/23/2025. Pais stated that on the morning of 8/23/2025, a med tech went to the resident’s room about 8:30 AM to pass medications. The resident’s spouse stated that she was sleeping. When the med tech returned about 9:30 AM to pass medications, the resident’s spouse stated that the resident was out walking their dog. When the med tech returned about 10:30 AM to pass medications, the resident’s spouse stated that the resident had not returned to their room. The med tech called the Administrator to report the resident’s absence and the facility began their elopement protocol. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825115709
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide timely medical care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 02/26/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility to present findings regarding a Complaint. LPA Campbell met with Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide timely medical care, on 09/10/24, a complaint was filed with the Department alleging neglect/lack of care and supervision. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with staff and reviewed files for S4 and R1. When interviewed, staff reported that S4 did not check on R1 and other residents when requested due to COVID-19. Based on these findings, it was SUBSTANTIATED that staff did not provide timely medical care. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. This incident is currently under review and a civil penalty may apply based on 1569.49(f) H&S. Failure to correct the deficiencies may alsCDSS inspection report, February 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241002164831
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility is kept free of odors Staff does not ensure residents rooms are kept in clean, sanitary conditions Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an investigation on a complaint that was submitted to the Department on 02/24/25. LPA Campbell met with Valerie Pais, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA Campbell observed rooms, hallways and stairwells, reviewed client and staff rosters and interviewed a random selection of residents. Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure the facility is kept free of odors, LPA Campbell observed odors in two of the six rooms selected for observation. The rooms were observed to be clean without obstructions but food was observed to have been left out in R2's room for a pet cat and R3 had been recently changed. Because residents prefer to keep their doors closed, LPA Campbell observed no odors in the facility hallways or common areas. Report continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250224103421

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff served unsafe food
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 12/2/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to open a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Jensen interviewed the Executive Director who advised that residents began presenting with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms on 11/26/24 in the PM. By 11/29/24 there were 26 residents and 13 staff members with GI symptoms. As of this date there are 33 residents with GI symptoms and 25 staff. Residents are returning from the hospital with discharges paperwork that states they have an unspecified gastrointestinal virus. In the presence of LPA the Executive Director contacted the Administrative Director of Acute Services with Adventist hospital who confirmed that stool samples were taken from some residents and a panel of testing was conducted to rule out food bourne illness. Tests to date have come back negative for food bourne illness. CoCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241127112128
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure call signal system requests are answered in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/23/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue an investigation in to a complaint investigation related to the above listed allegations. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Valerie Pais and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA Jensen reviewed care response logs and emails between the responsible party for resident 1 (R1) and facility staff. During the course of an interview with the Executive Director, LPA Jensen asked what a reasonable amount of time would be for staff to respond to a resident that activates their call pendant. The Executive Director responded that response times can vary depending on what else is happening in the facility such as a resident emergency for example but generally a call should be responded to within 15-20 minutes. LPA Jensen reviewed response logs for R1 for the week of 7/21/24 to 7/27/24. During that period of time R1 activated the call pendant 16 timesCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240807163148
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are being met. Facility is charging resident for services not provided.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 4/29/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Executive Director Aimee Jo Mattson and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation the Department conducted interviews with a Home Health Nurse, the facility Regional Nurse, the Executive Director and resident 1 (R1). The Department also reviewed documentation that includes an Admission Agreement, Needs and Service Plans, Home Health documentation, facility policy, in-service training records, and resident chart notes. Based on the facility bathing policy, "staff will ensure resident's participation to bathe or shower on a routine basis...Twice weekly and as needed will be scheduled." Based on LPA Jensen's review of the skin observation sheet R1 was bathed 6 times in ten weeks. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240208161140

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
30
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 288-4630
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Skyline Place Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.